organic compounds
Redetermination of 5,5-dihydroxybarbituric acid trihydrate (alloxan tetrahydrate)
aDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AJ, England
*Correspondence e-mail: d.a.tocher@ucl.ac.uk
The low temperature redetermination of 5,5-dihydroxybarbituric acid trihydrate, C4H4N2O5·3H2O, (historically misnamed alloxan tetrahydrate) is reported here. The organic molecule has crystallographic mirror symmetry, as does one of the water molecules.
Comment
The ). In that original room-temperature study, only three of the six H atoms in the could be located by means of difference Fourier syntheses, and the structure refined to a final R value of 0.097. We have redetermined this at 150 K, with a final R value of 0.028, to gain more accurate data for our theoretical modelling studies. The low-temperature redetermination located all the H atoms, which were refined isotropically. The precision of the unit-cell dimensions was improved by an order of magnitude. The unit-cell volume decreased by ca. 27 Å3, consistent with the determination at low temperature. In general, the molecular geometric parameters are not significantly different, the exception being the C6—O6 bond length, which is shorter in the low-temperature structure, while C2—O2 is actually longer in the low-temperature structure, both by ca. 0.1 Å.
of 5,5-dihydroxybarbituric acid trihydrate, (I) (originally misnamed alloxan tetrahydrate) was determined by Mootz & Jeffrey (1965Compound (I) crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/m, with the organic molecule on a mirror plane plus one water molecule in a general position and a second on a mirror plane (Fig. 1). The crystallographic plane is normal to the pyrimidine ring, passing through atoms O2, C2, C5, O7 and O8. The hydroxyl H atoms attached to the ring are disordered across the mirror plane. The water molecule O2W, in a general position, is disordered with one of the H atoms refined over two positions. The third water of solvation lies on the mirror plane at (0, y, 1), with the mirror bisecting the H—O—H angle.
The C—N bond lengths in the ring range from 1.3666 (11) to 1.3752 (9) Å, and the C5—C6 bond length is 1.5272 (10) Å. The packing (Fig. 2) consists of centrosymmetric dimers hydrogen-bonded to form a chain, with the water molecules lying between these chains, forming a buckled sheet structure. The water molecules in general positions form O—H⋯O bonds to the organic hydroxyl groups, whilst the water molecules on the mirror plane bond to the unique hydrogen-bond carbonyl acceptor on the organic molecules (Fig. 3). The water molecules on the mirror planes and in general positions also hydrogen-bond to each other in the sheet. The D⋯A distance within the bonded chains of molecules is 2.8580 (6) Å, whilst the O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds range from 2.7217 (11) to 2.9343 (9) Å. All potential donors and acceptors are used in the hydrogen bonding.
Experimental
To complement the results from an experimental polymorph search on alloxan, 5,5-dihydroxybarbituric acid trihydrate was obtained from Aldrich as colourless plate-like crystals of alloxan tetrahydrate (Fig. 4). These crystals were very sensitive and decompose rapidly in air.
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
The non-H atoms were refined freely with anisotropic displacement parameters, with the H atoms refined independently with an isotropic model.
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: MERCURY (Bruno et al., 2002) and SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536804022019/bt6507sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536804022019/bt6507Isup2.hkl
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: Mercury (Bruno et al., 2002) and SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.C4H4N2O5·3H2O | F(000) = 448 |
Mr = 214.14 | Dx = 1.688 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/m | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 9.4614 (8) Å | Cell parameters from 3125 reflections |
b = 12.2095 (10) Å | θ = 2.7–28.2° |
c = 7.2973 (6) Å | µ = 0.17 mm−1 |
β = 91.465 (1)° | T = 150 K |
V = 842.70 (12) Å3 | Plate, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.72 × 0.62 × 0.11 mm |
Bruker SMART APEX diffractometer | 1036 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1019 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.015 |
ω rotation with narrow frames scans | θmax = 28.2°, θmin = 2.7° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −12→12 |
Tmin = 0.889, Tmax = 0.982 | k = −15→15 |
3701 measured reflections | l = −9→9 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.078 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.12 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0445P)2 + 0.3397P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1036 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
100 parameters | Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
O2 | 0.07576 (10) | 0.0000 | 0.71087 (12) | 0.0213 (2) | |
O6 | 0.37126 (7) | 0.19208 (5) | 0.35604 (9) | 0.02282 (19) | |
O7 | 0.28600 (10) | 0.0000 | 0.13202 (12) | 0.0194 (2) | |
O8 | 0.50741 (9) | 0.0000 | 0.28277 (13) | 0.0178 (2) | |
O1W | 0.0000 | 0.15469 (8) | 1.0000 | 0.0266 (2) | |
O2W | 0.15495 (8) | 0.33927 (6) | 0.11287 (12) | 0.0282 (2) | |
N1 | 0.21286 (7) | 0.09635 (6) | 0.51944 (9) | 0.01624 (19) | |
C2 | 0.16226 (12) | 0.0000 | 0.59004 (16) | 0.0154 (2) | |
C5 | 0.36230 (12) | 0.0000 | 0.29895 (16) | 0.0151 (2) | |
C6 | 0.31848 (9) | 0.10501 (7) | 0.39599 (11) | 0.0157 (2) | |
H1 | 0.1840 (14) | 0.1584 (11) | 0.574 (2) | 0.032 (3)* | |
H7 | 0.303 (3) | 0.058 (2) | 0.076 (5) | 0.040 (8)* | 0.50 |
H8 | 0.535 (3) | −0.056 (2) | 0.244 (4) | 0.034 (7)* | 0.50 |
H9 | 0.0322 (19) | 0.1122 (16) | 0.915 (2) | 0.055 (5)* | |
H10 | 0.1164 (17) | 0.2799 (16) | 0.078 (2) | 0.051 (4)* | |
H11A | 0.181 (3) | 0.373 (3) | 0.031 (5) | 0.036 (8)* | 0.50 |
H11B | 0.090 (3) | 0.373 (3) | 0.160 (4) | 0.027 (6)* | 0.50 |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O2 | 0.0226 (4) | 0.0201 (5) | 0.0216 (5) | 0.000 | 0.0089 (3) | 0.000 |
O6 | 0.0270 (4) | 0.0156 (3) | 0.0263 (4) | −0.0019 (2) | 0.0091 (3) | 0.0007 (2) |
O7 | 0.0256 (5) | 0.0181 (5) | 0.0145 (4) | 0.000 | −0.0013 (3) | 0.000 |
O8 | 0.0157 (4) | 0.0151 (4) | 0.0229 (4) | 0.000 | 0.0058 (3) | 0.000 |
O1W | 0.0331 (5) | 0.0177 (5) | 0.0296 (5) | 0.000 | 0.0112 (4) | 0.000 |
O2W | 0.0274 (4) | 0.0198 (4) | 0.0369 (4) | 0.0010 (3) | −0.0067 (3) | −0.0012 (3) |
N1 | 0.0183 (3) | 0.0130 (4) | 0.0177 (4) | 0.0003 (2) | 0.0041 (3) | −0.0011 (3) |
C2 | 0.0152 (5) | 0.0158 (5) | 0.0153 (5) | 0.000 | 0.0008 (4) | 0.000 |
C5 | 0.0162 (5) | 0.0153 (5) | 0.0141 (5) | 0.000 | 0.0026 (4) | 0.000 |
C6 | 0.0171 (4) | 0.0153 (4) | 0.0146 (4) | 0.0001 (3) | 0.0005 (3) | 0.0006 (3) |
O2—C2 | 1.2183 (15) | O2W—H11A | 0.77 (4) |
O6—C6 | 1.2132 (11) | O2W—H11B | 0.82 (3) |
O7—C5 | 1.4000 (14) | N1—C6 | 1.3666 (11) |
O7—H7 | 0.83 (3) | N1—C2 | 1.3752 (9) |
O8—C5 | 1.3810 (14) | N1—H1 | 0.901 (14) |
O8—H8 | 0.78 (3) | C2—N1i | 1.3752 (9) |
O1W—H9 | 0.868 (18) | C5—C6 | 1.5272 (10) |
O2W—H10 | 0.85 (2) | C5—C6i | 1.5272 (10) |
C5—O7—H7 | 109 (2) | N1—C2—N1i | 117.62 (10) |
C5—O8—H8 | 112 (2) | O8—C5—O7 | 114.66 (10) |
H10—O2W—H11A | 111 (3) | O8—C5—C6 | 108.78 (6) |
H10—O2W—H11B | 104 (2) | O7—C5—C6 | 105.27 (6) |
H11A—O2W—H11B | 108 (3) | O8—C5—C6i | 108.78 (6) |
C6—N1—C2 | 125.49 (8) | O7—C5—C6i | 105.27 (6) |
C6—N1—H1 | 117.5 (8) | C6—C5—C6i | 114.19 (9) |
C2—N1—H1 | 116.2 (9) | O6—C6—N1 | 122.59 (8) |
O2—C2—N1 | 121.19 (5) | O6—C6—C5 | 120.40 (7) |
O2—C2—N1i | 121.19 (5) | N1—C6—C5 | 116.90 (7) |
C6—N1—C2—O2 | 173.91 (10) | O7—C5—C6—O6 | −80.59 (10) |
C6—N1—C2—N1i | −6.06 (16) | C6i—C5—C6—O6 | 164.45 (6) |
C2—N1—C6—O6 | −170.32 (9) | O8—C5—C6—N1 | −140.99 (8) |
C2—N1—C6—C5 | 13.52 (13) | O7—C5—C6—N1 | 95.66 (9) |
O8—C5—C6—O6 | 42.76 (12) | C6i—C5—C6—N1 | −19.30 (13) |
Symmetry code: (i) x, −y, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1···O6ii | 0.901 (14) | 1.970 (14) | 2.8580 (10) | 168.1 (13) |
O7—H7···O2Wiii | 0.83 (3) | 1.92 (3) | 2.7217 (11) | 163 (3) |
O8—H8···O2Wiv | 0.78 (3) | 1.98 (3) | 2.7250 (10) | 160 (3) |
O1W—H9···O2 | 0.868 (18) | 2.075 (19) | 2.9343 (9) | 170.6 (16) |
O2W—H10···O1Wv | 0.85 (2) | 1.96 (2) | 2.8009 (11) | 171.3 (15) |
O2W—H11A···O7iii | 0.77 (4) | 1.99 (4) | 2.7217 (11) | 160 (3) |
O2W—H11B···O8vi | 0.82 (3) | 1.96 (3) | 2.7250 (10) | 154 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z; (iv) x+1/2, y−1/2, z; (v) x, y, z−1; (vi) x−1/2, y+1/2, z. |
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the EPSRC in funding a studentship for TCL. The authors acknowledge the Research Councils UK Basic Technology Programme for supporting `Control and Prediction of the Organic Solid State'. For more information on this work, please visit https://www.chem.ucl.ac.uk/basictechorg/.
References
Bruker (2000). SMART, SAINT and SHELXTL. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M. K., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389–397. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Mootz, D., Jeffrey, G. A. (1965). Acta Cryst. 19, 717–725. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1990). Acta Cryst. A46, 467–473. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.