organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

N-(2-Bromo­phen­yl)propionamide

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland
*Correspondence e-mail: w.harrison@abdn.ac.uk

(Received 1 September 2005; accepted 6 September 2005; online 14 September 2005)

The title compound, C9H10BrNO, posseses normal geom­etrical parameters. The crystal packing is influenced by an N—H⋯O hydrogen bond.

Comment

The title compound, (I)[link] (Fig. 1[link]), was prepared as part of our ongoing studies of acetanilide derivatives (Ronaldson et al., 2005[Ronaldson, V., Storey, J. M. D. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o3156-o3158.]).

[Scheme 1]

The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the benzene ring (atoms C1–C6) and the N1/O1/C7/C8 side chain is 40.92 (10)°. This is very similar to the value [42.75 (14)°] in N-(2-bromo­phen­yl)acetamide, (II) (Ronaldson et al., 2005[Ronaldson, V., Storey, J. M. D. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o3156-o3158.]). The bond angle sum about N1 in (I)[link] is 360.0°, indicating that this atom is sp2 hybridized. The C6—N1 distance of 1.416 (3) Å in (I)[link] is almost identical to the equivalent distance [1.418 (4) Å] in (II). All the other geometrical parameters for (I)[link] lie within their expected ranges (Allen et al., 1995[Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1995). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. C, Section 9.5, pp. 685-706. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.]).

The crystal packing in (I)[link] is influenced by an N—H⋯O hydrogen bond (Table 1[link] and Fig. 2[link]) that links the mol­ecules into chains propagating in the [100] direction. There are no ππ inter­actions in (I)[link]. The unit-cell packing is shown in Fig. 3[link]; (I)[link] is essentially isostructural (same space group, similar unit-cell parameters) with (II), except that the unit cell for (I)[link] is slightly expanded in the c-axis direction to accommodate the more bulky terminal ethyl moiety.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
View of (I)[link], shown with 50% displacement ellipsoids. H atoms are drawn as small spheres of arbitrary radius.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Detail of (I)[link], showing how N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (dashed lines) link mol­ecules into a chain. The view direction is perpendicular to the mean plane of the benzene ring of the central mol­ecule, showing that no ππ stacking occurs. All H atoms except H1 have been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry codes: (i) x − 1, y, z; (ii) x + 1, y, z.]
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
The packing in (I)[link], viewed down [010], with all H atoms except H1 omitted for clarity.

Experimental

2-Bromo­aniline (3.44 g, 20.0 mmol) was added to a solution of propionyl chloride (2.22 g, 24.0 mmol) and DIPEA (N,N-diisopropyl­ethyl­amine) (3.12 g, 24.0 mmol) in dry tetra­hydro­furan (20 ml) at 273 K. The reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography and, when complete, the mixture was diluted with water (20 ml) and the product was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 ml). The organic phase was washed with water (2 × 20 ml) and brine (20 ml) then dried over MgSO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product which was recrystallized from CH2Cl2 to give 4.31 g (95% yield) of (I)[link] as colourless needles. M.p. 360–362 K; RF = 0.19 [hexa­ne/EtOAc (10:1)]; νmax (KBr disc)/cm−1: 3277 (NH), 2971–2932 (C—H), 1655 (C=O), 1573 (Ar C=C); δH (250 MHz, CDCl3) 1.27 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH3), 2.46 (2H, q, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2), 6.95 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H), 7.29 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, Ar—H), 7.51 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, Ar—H), 8.35 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H); δC (CDCl3) 9.6 (CH3), 31.1 (—CO–CH2—), 113.2, 121.9, 125.0, 128.4, 132.2 and 135.7 (Ar–C), 172.0 (C=O). [M+H]+ 226.994, C9H1079BrNO requires 226.995.

Crystal data
  • C9H10BrNO

  • Mr = 228.09

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /n

  • a = 4.8701 (1) Å

  • b = 11.8048 (4) Å

  • c = 15.9296 (5) Å

  • β = 93.964 (2)°

  • V = 913.61 (5) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Dx = 1.658 Mg m−3

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • Cell parameters from 2165 reflections

  • θ = 2.9–27.5°

  • μ = 4.45 mm−1

  • T = 120 (2) K

  • Needle, colourless

  • 0.36 × 0.05 × 0.02 mm

Data collection
  • Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • ω and φ scans

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.])Tmin = 0.297, Tmax = 0.916

  • 13742 measured reflections

  • 2092 independent reflections

  • 1822 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.043

  • θmax = 27.5°

  • h = −6 → 6

  • k = −15 → 15

  • l = −20 → 20

Refinement
  • Refinement on F2

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027

  • wR(F2) = 0.065

  • S = 1.07

  • 2092 reflections

  • 114 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0226P)2 + 0.9463P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

  • (Δ/σ)max = 0.001

  • Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3

  • Extinction correction: SHELXL97

  • Extinction coefficient: 0.0039 (9)

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O1i 0.85 (3) 2.06 (3) 2.889 (2) 164 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x-1, y, z.

All C-bound H atoms were placed in idealized positions (C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å) and refined as riding on their carriers with the constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(methyl C) applied. The methyl group was allowed to rotate about the C9—C8 bond as a rigid group. The N-bound H atom was located in a difference map and its position was freely refned with the constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N).

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998[Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]); data reduction: SCALEPACK and DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]), and SORTAV (Blessing, 1995[Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33-38.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP3 (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

The title compound, (I) (Fig. 1), was prepared as part of our ongoing studies of acetanilide derivatives (Ronaldson et al., 2005).

The dihedral angle between the best planes of the benzene ring (atoms C1–C6) and the N1/O1/C7/C8 side chain is 40.92 (10)°. This is very similar to the value [42.75 (14)°] in N-(2-bromophenyl)acetamide, (II) (Ronaldson et al., 2005). The bond angle sum about N1 in (I) is 360.0°, indicating that this atom is sp2 hybridized. The C6—N1 distance of 1.416 (3) Å in (I) is almost identical to the equivalent distance [1.418 (4) Å] in (II). All the other geometrical parameters for (I) lie within their expected ranges (Allen et al., 1995).

The crystal packing in (I) is infludenced by an N—H···O hydrogen bond (Table 1 and Fig. 2) that links the molecules into chains propagating in the [100] direction. There are no ππ interactions in (I). The unit-cell packing is shown in Fig. 3; (I) is essentially isostructural (same space group, similar unit-cell parameters) with (II), except that the unit cell for (I) is slightly expanded in the c axis direction to accommodate the more bulky terminal ethyl moiety.

Experimental top

2-Bromoaniline (3.44 g, 20.0 mmol) was added to a solution of propionyl chloride (2.22 g, 24.0 mmol) and DIPEA (N,N-diisopropylethylamine) (3.12 g, 24.0 mmol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (20 ml) at 273 K. The reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography and when complete, the mixture was diluted with water (20 ml) and the product was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 ml). The organic phase was then washed with water (2 × 20 ml) and brine (20 ml) then dried over MgSO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product which was recrystallized from CH2Cl2 to give 4.31 g (95% yield) of (I) as colourless needles. M.p. 360–362 K; RF = 0.19 [hexane/EtOAc (10:1)]; νmax (KBr disc)/cm−1: 3277 (NH), 2971–2932 (C—H), 1655 (CO), 1573 (Ar CC); δH (250 MHz, CDCl3) 1.27 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH3), 2.46 (2H, q, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2), 6.95 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H), 7.29 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, Ar—H), 7.51 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, Ar—H), 8.35 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H); δC (CDCl3) 9.6 (CH3), 31.1 (—CO–CH2—), 113.2, 121.9, 125.0, 128.4, 132.2 and 135.7 (Ar–C), 172.0 (CO). [M+H]+ 226.994, C9H1079BrNO requires 226.995.

Refinement top

All C-bound H atoms were placed in idealized positions (C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å) and refined as riding on their carriers with the constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(methyl C) applied. The methyl group was allowed to rotate about the C9—C8 bond as a rigid group. The N-bound H atom was located in a difference map and its position was freely refned with the constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N).

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: SCALEPACK and DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), and SORTAV (Blessing, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. View of (I), shown with 50% displacement ellipsoids. H atoms are drawn as small spheres of arbitrary radius.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Detail of (I), showing how N—H···O hydrogen bonds (dashed lines) link molecules into a chain. The view direction is perpendicular to the best plane of the benzene ring of the central molecule, showing that no ππ stacking occurs. All H atoms except H1 have been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry codes: (i) x − 1, y, z; (ii) x + 1, y, z.]
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Unit-cell packing in (I), viewed down [010], with all H atoms except H1 omitted for clarity.
N-(2-Bromophenyl)propionamide top
Crystal data top
C9H10BrNOF(000) = 456
Mr = 228.09Dx = 1.658 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2165 reflections
a = 4.8701 (1) Åθ = 2.9–27.5°
b = 11.8048 (4) ŵ = 4.45 mm1
c = 15.9296 (5) ÅT = 120 K
β = 93.964 (2)°Needle, colourless
V = 913.61 (5) Å30.36 × 0.05 × 0.02 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2092 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1822 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.043
ω and ϕ scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
h = 66
Tmin = 0.297, Tmax = 0.916k = 1515
13742 measured reflectionsl = 2020
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.065 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0226P)2 + 0.9463P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2092 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.38 e Å3
114 parametersΔρmin = 0.37 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0039 (9)
Crystal data top
C9H10BrNOV = 913.61 (5) Å3
Mr = 228.09Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 4.8701 (1) ŵ = 4.45 mm1
b = 11.8048 (4) ÅT = 120 K
c = 15.9296 (5) Å0.36 × 0.05 × 0.02 mm
β = 93.964 (2)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2092 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
1822 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.297, Tmax = 0.916Rint = 0.043
13742 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0270 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.065H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.38 e Å3
2092 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.37 e Å3
114 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.4616 (5)0.54914 (19)0.20494 (14)0.0194 (5)
C20.5180 (5)0.6609 (2)0.22655 (15)0.0237 (5)
H20.43420.69490.27240.028*
C30.6975 (5)0.7226 (2)0.18071 (16)0.0273 (5)
H30.74170.79850.19600.033*
C40.8129 (5)0.6731 (2)0.11218 (16)0.0260 (5)
H40.93700.71530.08090.031*
C50.7481 (5)0.5631 (2)0.08939 (15)0.0236 (5)
H50.82280.53110.04120.028*
C60.5740 (4)0.4983 (2)0.13620 (14)0.0186 (5)
C70.6917 (4)0.3057 (2)0.09094 (13)0.0186 (5)
C80.5718 (5)0.1890 (2)0.07664 (16)0.0238 (5)
H8A0.40530.19500.03760.029*
H8B0.51390.15940.13080.029*
C90.7679 (5)0.1053 (2)0.04102 (19)0.0334 (6)
H9A0.69080.02880.04350.050*
H9B0.94510.10800.07410.050*
H9C0.79490.12490.01760.050*
N10.5104 (4)0.38443 (17)0.11491 (12)0.0199 (4)
H10.342 (6)0.367 (2)0.1167 (16)0.024*
O10.9361 (3)0.32624 (14)0.08417 (11)0.0241 (4)
Br10.23270 (5)0.46366 (2)0.273034 (14)0.02474 (11)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0135 (10)0.0232 (12)0.0217 (11)0.0002 (9)0.0026 (8)0.0011 (9)
C20.0237 (12)0.0234 (12)0.0243 (12)0.0024 (9)0.0030 (9)0.0022 (10)
C30.0258 (13)0.0202 (12)0.0357 (14)0.0008 (10)0.0011 (10)0.0007 (11)
C40.0195 (12)0.0277 (13)0.0311 (13)0.0039 (10)0.0034 (10)0.0064 (10)
C50.0195 (12)0.0279 (13)0.0242 (12)0.0007 (9)0.0064 (9)0.0003 (10)
C60.0138 (10)0.0211 (11)0.0205 (11)0.0014 (9)0.0008 (9)0.0013 (9)
C70.0162 (11)0.0244 (12)0.0152 (10)0.0014 (9)0.0017 (8)0.0003 (9)
C80.0149 (11)0.0229 (12)0.0336 (13)0.0034 (9)0.0019 (9)0.0025 (10)
C90.0265 (13)0.0269 (13)0.0472 (16)0.0046 (11)0.0046 (12)0.0115 (12)
N10.0119 (9)0.0239 (10)0.0242 (10)0.0033 (8)0.0038 (7)0.0028 (8)
O10.0142 (8)0.0249 (9)0.0334 (9)0.0022 (6)0.0043 (7)0.0052 (7)
Br10.02460 (16)0.02600 (15)0.02478 (16)0.00150 (9)0.01004 (10)0.00078 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.386 (3)C6—N11.416 (3)
C1—C61.393 (3)C7—O11.227 (3)
C1—Br11.899 (2)C7—N11.355 (3)
C2—C31.384 (3)C7—C81.507 (3)
C2—H20.9500C8—C91.512 (3)
C3—C41.390 (4)C8—H8A0.9900
C3—H30.9500C8—H8B0.9900
C4—C51.379 (3)C9—H9A0.9800
C4—H40.9500C9—H9B0.9800
C5—C61.395 (3)C9—H9C0.9800
C5—H50.9500N1—H10.85 (3)
C2—C1—C6121.5 (2)O1—C7—N1122.9 (2)
C2—C1—Br1118.57 (17)O1—C7—C8122.4 (2)
C6—C1—Br1119.90 (17)N1—C7—C8114.60 (19)
C3—C2—C1119.4 (2)C7—C8—C9113.92 (19)
C3—C2—H2120.3C7—C8—H8A108.8
C1—C2—H2120.3C9—C8—H8A108.8
C2—C3—C4119.9 (2)C7—C8—H8B108.8
C2—C3—H3120.1C9—C8—H8B108.8
C4—C3—H3120.1H8A—C8—H8B107.7
C5—C4—C3120.3 (2)C8—C9—H9A109.5
C5—C4—H4119.9C8—C9—H9B109.5
C3—C4—H4119.9H9A—C9—H9B109.5
C4—C5—C6120.8 (2)C8—C9—H9C109.5
C4—C5—H5119.6H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C6—C5—H5119.6H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C1—C6—C5118.1 (2)C7—N1—C6125.68 (19)
C1—C6—N1120.4 (2)C7—N1—H1119.4 (18)
C5—C6—N1121.6 (2)C6—N1—H1114.9 (18)
C6—C1—C2—C32.3 (4)C4—C5—C6—C11.9 (4)
Br1—C1—C2—C3176.17 (18)C4—C5—C6—N1178.5 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C41.9 (4)O1—C7—C8—C98.7 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C50.4 (4)N1—C7—C8—C9173.8 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C62.3 (4)O1—C7—N1—C60.9 (4)
C2—C1—C6—C50.4 (4)C8—C7—N1—C6176.7 (2)
Br1—C1—C6—C5178.01 (17)C1—C6—N1—C7138.0 (2)
C2—C1—C6—N1179.3 (2)C5—C6—N1—C742.4 (3)
Br1—C1—C6—N12.3 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.85 (3)2.06 (3)2.889 (2)164 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H10BrNO
Mr228.09
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)4.8701 (1), 11.8048 (4), 15.9296 (5)
β (°) 93.964 (2)
V3)913.61 (5)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)4.45
Crystal size (mm)0.36 × 0.05 × 0.02
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
Tmin, Tmax0.297, 0.916
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
13742, 2092, 1822
Rint0.043
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.651
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.027, 0.065, 1.07
No. of reflections2092
No. of parameters114
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.38, 0.37

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SCALEPACK and DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), and SORTAV (Blessing, 1995), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997), SHELXL97.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.85 (3)2.06 (3)2.889 (2)164 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y, z.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Service (University of Swansea) and the EPSRC National Crystallography Service (University of Southampton) for data collections.

References

First citationAllen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1995). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. C, Section 9.5, pp. 685–706. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.  Google Scholar
First citationBlessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2003). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationNonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
First citationRonaldson, V., Storey, J. M. D. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o3156–o3158.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds