organic compounds
Malonamide: a tetragonal polymorph
aSchool of Natural Sciences (Chemistry), Bedson Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England
*Correspondence e-mail: w.clegg@ncl.ac.uk
A tetragonal polymorph of malonamide, C3H6N2O2, is reported. The unit-cell dimensions, and some aspects of the molecular geometry are significantly different from those of the known monoclinic form [Chieh et al. (1970). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 179–184]. An R33(12) hydrogen-bonding motif links molecules together into a three-dimensional network.
Comment
Crystals of malonamide, (I), were obtained from a reaction between 4,6-dihydroxypyrimidine and Na2CO3 in water. Data collected at 150 K showed that it had crystallized in P43212 with Z′ = 0.5 and Z = 4. It was only some time after structure solution that, by carrying out a search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.26; Allen, 2002), we realised a of malonamide had previously been reported (Chieh et al., 1970) in P21/c with two independent molecules in the and a final R = 0.05. This indicates either that the structure undergoes a above 150 K or that we had identified a second polymorph. However, by the time this was realized the original crystalline sample had been lost, although the original aqueous solution remained. In an attempt to answer this question we crystallized more of the product, with the intention of carrying out unit-cell determinations at 150 K and room temperature in order to show any What we actually determined was a further, orthorhombic, polymorph of (I), described in the following paper (Nichol & Clegg, 2005). This third polymorph did not undergo a between room temperature and 150 K and, based on this observation, we are satisfied that the structure presented here is probably a genuine polymorph and not the consequence of a from the previously reported form as a result of cooling.
The molecular structure of (I) is shown in Fig. 1. The consists of one half of the molecule, and the complete molecule is generated from the by a twofold axis which passes through C2. Bond lengths and angles are in good agreement with the mean values reported by Chieh et al. (1970); however, the torsion angle about the C1—C2 bond is significantly different. Fig. 2 shows a wireframe diagram of (I) with two mean planes fitted through O, N, C1 and C2 and through the respective symmetry equivalents. Both planes intersect at C2 and the angle between the two planes is 58.68 (4)°. This value is over 27° less than the angles reported by Chieh et al. (1970) for both independent molecules (84.8 and 85.3°).
Fig. 3 shows a packing diagram viewed along the b axis. What initially looks like a complicated network is actually the result of just two independent N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (one for each of the amino H atoms), with the O atom acting as a bifurcated acceptor. The result of this is a three-dimensional network of R33(12) hydrogen-bonding motifs, illustrated in Fig. 4 (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995).
Experimental
Equimolar amounts of 4,6-dihydroxypyrimidine and Na2CO3 were dissolved in 20 ml of hot distilled water, forming a pale-yellow solution. Large plate-shaped crystals of (I) were grown by slow evaporation of the cold solution on a watch glass over a period of approximately 5 d.
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
|
All H atoms were located in a difference map and their coordinates were refined freely, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N,C). The C—H bond length refined to 0.986 (19) Å and the two N—H bond lengths refined to 0.87 (2) and 0.79 (2) Å. Friedel pairs were merged during the final cycles due to the lack of significant the choice of P43212 rather than P41212 is arbitrary.
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell DIRAX (Duisenberg, 1992); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); molecular graphics: DIAMOND3 (Brandenburg & Putz, 2004) and MERCURY (Version 1.3; Bruno et al., 2002); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and local programs.
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536805030539/bt6745sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536805030539/bt6745Isup2.hkl
Equimolar amounts of 4,6-dihydroxypyrimidine and Na2CO3 were dissolved in 20 ml of hot distilled water, forming a pale-yellow solution. Large plate-shaped crystals of (I) were grown by slow evaporation of the cold solution on a watch glass over a period of approximately 5 d.
All H atoms were located in a difference map and their coordinates were refined freely, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N,C). The C—H bond length refined to 0.986 (19) Å and the two N—H bond lengths refined to 0.87 (2) and 0.79 (2) Å. Friedel pairs were merged during the final
cycles due to the lack of significant anomalous dispersion.Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell
DIRAX (Duisenberg, 1992); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); molecular graphics: DIAMOND3 (Brandenburg & Putz, 2004) and Mercury (Version 1.3; Bruno et al., 2002); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and local programs.C3H6N2O2 | Dx = 1.546 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 102.10 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Tetragonal, P43212 | Cell parameters from 54 reflections |
Hall symbol: P 4nw 2abw | θ = 2.5–27.5° |
a = 5.3140 (3) Å | µ = 0.13 mm−1 |
c = 15.5360 (12) Å | T = 150 K |
V = 438.71 (5) Å3 | Block, light yellow |
Z = 4 | 0.50 × 0.50 × 0.02 mm |
F(000) = 216 |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 340 independent reflections |
Radiation source: sealed tube | 324 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.018 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 5.3° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) | h = −6→6 |
Tmin = 0.902, Tmax = 0.997 | k = −5→6 |
6874 measured reflections | l = −20→20 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032 | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
wR(F2) = 0.082 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0509P)2 + 0.0691P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.23 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
340 reflections | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
43 parameters | Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.12 (3) |
C3H6N2O2 | Z = 4 |
Mr = 102.10 | Mo Kα radiation |
Tetragonal, P43212 | µ = 0.13 mm−1 |
a = 5.3140 (3) Å | T = 150 K |
c = 15.5360 (12) Å | 0.50 × 0.50 × 0.02 mm |
V = 438.71 (5) Å3 |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 340 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) | 324 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.902, Tmax = 0.997 | Rint = 0.018 |
6874 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.082 | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
S = 1.23 | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
340 reflections | Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 |
43 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O | 0.35135 (18) | 0.5410 (2) | 0.08252 (5) | 0.0193 (4) | |
N | −0.0616 (2) | 0.5402 (3) | 0.04955 (8) | 0.0182 (4) | |
H1N | −0.095 (4) | 0.675 (4) | 0.0800 (11) | 0.022* | |
H2N | −0.177 (4) | 0.469 (4) | 0.0277 (12) | 0.022* | |
C1 | 0.1676 (3) | 0.4422 (3) | 0.04704 (8) | 0.0134 (4) | |
C2 | 0.1932 (2) | 0.1932 (2) | 0.0000 | 0.0147 (4) | |
H2 | 0.166 (3) | 0.064 (4) | 0.0448 (10) | 0.018* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O | 0.0154 (6) | 0.0201 (6) | 0.0222 (5) | −0.0024 (4) | −0.0014 (4) | −0.0069 (4) |
N | 0.0137 (7) | 0.0158 (7) | 0.0252 (7) | 0.0002 (5) | −0.0013 (5) | −0.0063 (5) |
C1 | 0.0148 (7) | 0.0133 (7) | 0.0121 (5) | −0.0017 (5) | 0.0015 (5) | 0.0008 (5) |
C2 | 0.0130 (6) | 0.0130 (6) | 0.0180 (8) | −0.0020 (7) | 0.0020 (5) | −0.0020 (5) |
O—C1 | 1.2382 (17) | N—C1 | 1.3251 (19) |
N—H1N | 0.87 (2) | C1—C2 | 1.5176 (17) |
N—H2N | 0.79 (2) | C2—H2 | 0.986 (19) |
H1N—N—H2N | 117 (2) | N—C1—C2 | 116.07 (11) |
H1N—N—C1 | 121.7 (13) | C1—C2—C1i | 112.84 (16) |
H2N—N—C1 | 120.5 (15) | C1—C2—H2 | 104.6 (10) |
O—C1—N | 123.02 (13) | C1i—C2—H2 | 113.9 (11) |
O—C1—C2 | 120.88 (12) | ||
O—C1—C2—C1i | −36.66 (9) | N—C1—C2—C1i | 145.23 (12) |
Symmetry code: (i) y, x, −z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N—H1N···Oii | 0.87 (2) | 2.05 (2) | 2.9195 (16) | 170.8 (16) |
N—H2N···Oiii | 0.79 (2) | 2.36 (2) | 3.1112 (17) | 157.6 (19) |
Symmetry codes: (ii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1/4; (iii) y−1, x, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C3H6N2O2 |
Mr | 102.10 |
Crystal system, space group | Tetragonal, P43212 |
Temperature (K) | 150 |
a, c (Å) | 5.3140 (3), 15.5360 (12) |
V (Å3) | 438.71 (5) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.13 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.50 × 0.50 × 0.02 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.902, 0.997 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 6874, 340, 324 |
Rint | 0.018 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.650 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.032, 0.082, 1.23 |
No. of reflections | 340 |
No. of parameters | 43 |
H-atom treatment | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.19, −0.20 |
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), DIRAX (Duisenberg, 1992), EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003), SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001), DIAMOND3 (Brandenburg & Putz, 2004) and Mercury (Version 1.3; Bruno et al., 2002), SHELXTL and local programs.
O—C1 | 1.2382 (17) | C1—C2 | 1.5176 (17) |
N—C1 | 1.3251 (19) | ||
O—C1—C2—C1i | −36.66 (9) | N—C1—C2—C1i | 145.23 (12) |
Symmetry code: (i) y, x, −z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N—H1N···Oii | 0.87 (2) | 2.05 (2) | 2.9195 (16) | 170.8 (16) |
N—H2N···Oiii | 0.79 (2) | 2.36 (2) | 3.1112 (17) | 157.6 (19) |
Symmetry codes: (ii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1/4; (iii) y−1, x, −z. |
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the EPSRC for funding.
References
Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2004). DIAMOND3. University of Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389–397. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. J. (2003). Appl. Cryst. 36, 1103. CrossRef Google Scholar
Chieh, P. C., Subramanian, E. & Trotter, J. (1970). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 179–184. CrossRef Google Scholar
Duisenberg, A. J. M. (1992). J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 92–96. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Duisenberg, A. J. M., Kroon-Batenburg, L. M. J. & Schreurs, A. M. M. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 220–229. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120–126. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Nichol, G. S. & Clegg, W. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o3427–o3429. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2001). SHELXTL. Version 6. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.
Crystals of malonamide, (I), were obtained from a reaction between 4,6-dihydroxypyrimidine and Na2CO3 in water. Data collected at 150 K showed that it had crystallized in space group P43212 with Z' = 0.5 and Z = 4. It was only some time after structure solution that, by carrying out a search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.26; Allen, 2002), we realised a crystal structure of malonamide had previously been reported (Chieh et al., 1970) in space group P21/c with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit and a final R = 0.05. This indicates either that the structure undergoes a phase transition above 150 K or that we had identified a second polymorph. However, by the time this was realised the original crystalline sample had been lost, although the original aqueous solution remained. In an attempt to answer this question we crystallized more of the product, with the intention of carrying out unit-cell determinations at 150 K and room temperature in order to show any phase transition. What we actually determined was a further, orthorhombic, polymorph of (I), described in the following paper (Nichol & Clegg, 2005). This third polymorph did not undergo a phase transition between room temperature and 150 K and, based on this observation, we are satisfied that the structure presented here is probably a genuine polymorph and not the consequence of a phase transition from the previously reported form as a result of cooling.
The molecular structure of (I) is shown in Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit consists of one half of the molecule, and the complete molecule is generated from the asymmetric unit by a twofold axis which passes through C2. Bond lengths and angles are in good agreement with the mean values reported by Chieh et al. (1970); however, the torsion angle about the C1—C2 bond is significantly different. Fig. 2 shows a wireframe diagram of (I) with two mean planes fitted through O, N, C1 and C2 and through the respective symmetry equivalents. Both planes intersect at C2 and the angle between the two planes is 58.68 (4)°. This value is over 27° less than the angles reported by Chieh et al. (1970) for both independent molecules (84.8 and 85.3°).
Fig. 3 shows a packing diagram viewed along the b axis. What initially looks like a complicated network is actually the result of just two independent N—H···O hydrogen bonds (one for each of the amino H atoms), with the O atom acting as a bifurcated acceptor. The result of this is a three-dimensional network of R33(12) hydrogen-bonding motifs, illustrated in Fig. 4 (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995).