Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 64| Part 1| January 2008| Page m172
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807065841

(Croconato-κ2O,O′)bis­­(1,10-phenanthroline-κ2N,N′)manganese(II)

Hong-Feng Chen,a Hong-Yu Chen,b Xia Chen,a Andrei S. Batsanovc and Qi Fanga*

aState Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China, bFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Taishan Medical University, Taian 271000, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China, and cDepartment of Chemistry, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, England
*Correspondence e-mail: fangqi@sdu.edu.cn

(Received 20 November 2007; accepted 5 December 2007; online 12 December 2007)

The title complex, [Mn(C5O5)(C12H8N2)2], lies across a crystallographic twofold axis which passes through the Mn atom and bisects the croconate ligand. The two 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) ligands are arranged in a propeller manner and the local mol­ecular geometry of the MnN4O2 unit is severely distorted octa­hedral. This may be inter­preted as a structural perturbation of the MnN4 square by the croconate ligand. In the crystal structure, the dipole moments of the mol­ecules are arranged alternately along the +b and −b directions. All the phen ligands are involved in π stacking inter­actions, alternately along the [110] and [[\overline{1}]10] directions. The alternate spacings between the neighbouring phen planes in the one-dimensional π stacks are 3.361 (2) and 3.526 (2) Å.

Related literature

For related literature, see: Chen et al. (2005[Chen, H.-Y., Fang, Q., Xue, G. & Yu, W.-T. (2005). Acta Cryst. C61, m535-m537.], 2007[Chen, X., Chen, H.-F., Xue, G., Chen, H.-Y., Yu, W.-T. & Fang, Q. (2007). Acta Cryst. C63, m166-m168.]); Coronado et al. (2007[Coronado, E., Curreli, S., Giménez-Saiz, C., Gómez-García, C.-J., Deplano, P., Mercuri, M.-L., Serpe, A., Pilia, L., Faulmann, C. & Canadell, E. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 4446-4457.]); Maji et al. (2003[Maji, T. K., Konar, S., Mostafa, G., Zangrando, E., Lu, T.-H. & Chaudhuri, N. R. (2003). Dalton Trans. pp. 171-175.]); Sletten et al. (1998[Sletten, J., Daraghmeh, H., Lloret, F. & Julve, M. (1998). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 279, 127-135.]); Wang et al. (2002[Wang, C. C., Yang, C.-H. & Lee, G.-H. (2002). Inorg. Chem. 41, 1015-1018.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Mn(C5O5)(C12H8N2)2]

  • Mr = 555.40

  • Monoclinic, C 2/c

  • a = 14.9185 (6) Å

  • b = 10.3749 (4) Å

  • c = 16.0859 (6) Å

  • β = 109.885 (1)°

  • V = 2341.30 (16) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.62 mm−1

  • T = 120 (2) K

  • 0.44 × 0.33 × 0.22 mm
Data collection

  • Siemens SMART 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006[Bruker (2006). SADABS. Version 2006/1. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.617, Tmax = 0.746 (expected range = 0.722–0.873)

  • 16256 measured reflections

  • 3356 independent reflections

  • 3214 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.020
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026

  • wR(F2) = 0.081

  • S = 1.06

  • 3356 reflections

  • 210 parameters

  • All H-atom parameters refined

  • Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1997[Bruker (1997). SMART (Version 5.054) and SHELXTL (Version 5.10). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1999[Bruker (1999). SAINT. Version 6.01. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997[Bruker (1997). SMART (Version 5.054) and SHELXTL (Version 5.10). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807065841/fj2088sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807065841/fj2088Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report


Comment top

The croconate C5O52- anion has attracted increasing attention in recent years because this polydentate ligand gave rise to a variety of interesting complexes (Coronado et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2005; Maji et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2002; Sletten et al., 1998). Typically, the C5O52- anion can serve as a terminal bidentate ligand and a bridging ligand utilizing more than two O atoms for coordination. By comparison, the coordination chemistry of the neutral 1,10-phenanthroline bidentate ligand has been well studied.

Recently, we reported three mixed-ligand complexes [M(phen)2(C5O5)] (M=Co, Ni, Cu) (Chen et al., 2007), which have both croconate and 1,10-phenanthroline ligands. In this study, we report a new member of this family: [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] which is isostructural to [Cu(phen)2(C5O5)].

[Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] shows following common features with other three known [M(phen)2(C5O5)] complexes: the molecule lies across twofold axis which is along the direction of the molecular dipole moment. Around the molecular axis, two phen ligands are arranged in a chiral propeller manner. The C—O bond lengths involving coordinated O atoms are longer than those of other C—O bonds.

The mean M—N bond lengths in [M(phen)2(C5O5)] series are 2.2515 (9), 2.124 (2), 2.080 (3), and 2.065 (2) Å for the Mn, Co, Ni, and Cu complexes respectively, showing monotonous shortening with increasing the atomic number. The M—O lengths in [M(phen)2(C5O5)] are 2.2163 (8), 2.120 (2), 2.098 (3), and 2.303 (2) Å for the Mn, Co, Ni, and Cu complexes respectively, showing a similar shortening tendency except for Cu complex which has the longest M—O length.

The molecular conformation of [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] is close to [Cu(phen)2(C5O5)] while different from [Co(phen)2(C5O5)] and [Ni(phen)2(C5O5)]. The dihedral angles between the two phen planes for the Mn, Co, Ni, and Cu complexes are 46.5 (1), 85.7 (1), 86.0 (1), and 40.7 (1)°, respectively. In fact, the local polyhedral CoN4O2 and NiN4O2 in [M(phen)2(C5O5)] is close to the octahedral while MnN4O2 and CuN4O2 in their complexes is severely distorted from the octahedral. We can suppose that the Mn(II)(Cu(II)) ion intially combines two phen ligands forming a MnN4 (CuN4) square, and then this square is distorted by adding the croconato ligand. This supposition may be supported by the relatively longest Mn—O and Cu—O bond length mentioned above in these complexes.

As shown in Fig.2, the dipole moments of [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] molecules are arranged alternatively along +b and-b directions. All phen ligands are parallel packed with the π-stacks being alternatively along the [110] and [-110] directions. The spacings between the neighboring phen planes in this kind of 1-D π-stacks are 3.361 (2) and 3.526 (2) Å (alternatively spaced).

Both in the molecular view and in the crystal view, four [M(phen)2(C5O5)] members can be classified into two groups: the octahedral and Pbcn symmetric isostructural pair of [Co(phen)2(C5O5)] and [Ni(phen)2(C5O5)]; the non-octahedral and C2/c symmetric isostructural pair of [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] and [Cu(phen)2(C5O5)]. The similarity between Mn and Cu complexes here may be related to the fact that the d-shell is half-filled for Mn(II) and almost full-filled for Cu(II) ions.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Chen et al. (2005, 2007); Coronado et al. (2007); Maji et al. (2003); Sletten et al. (1998); Wang et al. (2002).

Experimental top

[K2(C5O5)] (0.10 g) and MnCl2.4H2O (0.09 g) were dissolved in mixed solvent of water (15 ml) and dimethylformamide (10 ml). Then 1,10-phenanthroline (0.15 g) was added. The mixture was heated to 340–350 K under continuous stirring for 20 min and then filtered. The green prisms crystals were obtained by slow evaporation at 313 K.

Refinement top

All the H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined in the isotropic approximation.

Structure description top

The croconate C5O52- anion has attracted increasing attention in recent years because this polydentate ligand gave rise to a variety of interesting complexes (Coronado et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2005; Maji et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2002; Sletten et al., 1998). Typically, the C5O52- anion can serve as a terminal bidentate ligand and a bridging ligand utilizing more than two O atoms for coordination. By comparison, the coordination chemistry of the neutral 1,10-phenanthroline bidentate ligand has been well studied.

Recently, we reported three mixed-ligand complexes [M(phen)2(C5O5)] (M=Co, Ni, Cu) (Chen et al., 2007), which have both croconate and 1,10-phenanthroline ligands. In this study, we report a new member of this family: [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] which is isostructural to [Cu(phen)2(C5O5)].

[Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] shows following common features with other three known [M(phen)2(C5O5)] complexes: the molecule lies across twofold axis which is along the direction of the molecular dipole moment. Around the molecular axis, two phen ligands are arranged in a chiral propeller manner. The C—O bond lengths involving coordinated O atoms are longer than those of other C—O bonds.

The mean M—N bond lengths in [M(phen)2(C5O5)] series are 2.2515 (9), 2.124 (2), 2.080 (3), and 2.065 (2) Å for the Mn, Co, Ni, and Cu complexes respectively, showing monotonous shortening with increasing the atomic number. The M—O lengths in [M(phen)2(C5O5)] are 2.2163 (8), 2.120 (2), 2.098 (3), and 2.303 (2) Å for the Mn, Co, Ni, and Cu complexes respectively, showing a similar shortening tendency except for Cu complex which has the longest M—O length.

The molecular conformation of [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] is close to [Cu(phen)2(C5O5)] while different from [Co(phen)2(C5O5)] and [Ni(phen)2(C5O5)]. The dihedral angles between the two phen planes for the Mn, Co, Ni, and Cu complexes are 46.5 (1), 85.7 (1), 86.0 (1), and 40.7 (1)°, respectively. In fact, the local polyhedral CoN4O2 and NiN4O2 in [M(phen)2(C5O5)] is close to the octahedral while MnN4O2 and CuN4O2 in their complexes is severely distorted from the octahedral. We can suppose that the Mn(II)(Cu(II)) ion intially combines two phen ligands forming a MnN4 (CuN4) square, and then this square is distorted by adding the croconato ligand. This supposition may be supported by the relatively longest Mn—O and Cu—O bond length mentioned above in these complexes.

As shown in Fig.2, the dipole moments of [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] molecules are arranged alternatively along +b and-b directions. All phen ligands are parallel packed with the π-stacks being alternatively along the [110] and [-110] directions. The spacings between the neighboring phen planes in this kind of 1-D π-stacks are 3.361 (2) and 3.526 (2) Å (alternatively spaced).

Both in the molecular view and in the crystal view, four [M(phen)2(C5O5)] members can be classified into two groups: the octahedral and Pbcn symmetric isostructural pair of [Co(phen)2(C5O5)] and [Ni(phen)2(C5O5)]; the non-octahedral and C2/c symmetric isostructural pair of [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)] and [Cu(phen)2(C5O5)]. The similarity between Mn and Cu complexes here may be related to the fact that the d-shell is half-filled for Mn(II) and almost full-filled for Cu(II) ions.

For related literature, see: Chen et al. (2005, 2007); Coronado et al. (2007); Maji et al. (2003); Sletten et al. (1998); Wang et al. (2002).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1997); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 1997); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)]. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level and H atoms have been omitted. [symmetry code: (i) -x, y, -z + 1/2.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A packing plot of [Mn(phen)2(C5O5)].
(Croconato-κ2O,O')bis(1,10-phenanthroline-κ2N,N')manganese(II) top
Crystal data top
[Mn(C5O5)(C12H8N2)2]F(000) = 1132
Mr = 555.40Dx = 1.576 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 6761 reflections
a = 14.9185 (6) Åθ = 2.4–30.0°
b = 10.3749 (4) ŵ = 0.62 mm−1
c = 16.0859 (6) ÅT = 120 K
β = 109.885 (1)°Parallelepiped, green
V = 2341.30 (16) Å30.44 × 0.33 × 0.22 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Siemens SMART 1K CCD area-detector
diffractometer		3356 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3214 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.020
Detector resolution: 8 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 2.4°
φ and ω scansh = −20→20
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2006)		k = −14→14
Tmin = 0.617, Tmax = 0.746l = −22→22
16256 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.081All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0494P)2 + 1.5339P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3356 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
210 parametersΔρmax = 0.50 e Å−3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.22 e Å−3
Crystal data top
[Mn(C5O5)(C12H8N2)2]V = 2341.30 (16) Å3
Mr = 555.40Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 14.9185 (6) ŵ = 0.62 mm−1
b = 10.3749 (4) ÅT = 120 K
c = 16.0859 (6) Å0.44 × 0.33 × 0.22 mm
β = 109.885 (1)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART 1K CCD area-detector
diffractometer		3356 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2006)		3214 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.617, Tmax = 0.746Rint = 0.020
16256 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0260 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.081All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.50 e Å−3
3356 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.22 e Å−3
210 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mn10.50000.26400 (2)0.25000.01622 (7)
O10.59885 (5)0.43062 (7)0.28042 (5)0.02103 (16)
O20.67021 (6)0.70377 (9)0.30364 (6)0.02748 (18)
O30.50000.87022 (11)0.25000.0219 (2)
N10.62594 (6)0.15684 (8)0.34684 (6)0.01795 (16)
N20.46304 (6)0.23245 (8)0.37113 (6)0.01674 (17)
C10.70739 (7)0.12417 (11)0.33554 (7)0.0215 (2)
H10.7115 (10)0.1353 (15)0.2787 (10)0.025 (4)*
C20.78638 (8)0.07591 (11)0.40428 (8)0.0236 (2)
H20.8456 (12)0.0555 (17)0.3931 (11)0.035 (4)*
C30.78032 (7)0.05937 (10)0.48675 (8)0.0216 (2)
H30.8314 (10)0.0290 (15)0.5356 (10)0.023 (3)*
C100.69459 (7)0.09129 (10)0.50113 (7)0.01780 (18)
C90.61971 (7)0.14089 (9)0.42867 (6)0.01610 (18)
C110.53204 (6)0.17845 (9)0.44123 (6)0.01574 (18)
C120.52078 (7)0.15896 (10)0.52374 (6)0.01709 (18)
C50.59808 (7)0.10556 (10)0.59570 (7)0.01991 (19)
H50.5877 (11)0.0922 (15)0.6492 (11)0.030 (4)*
C40.68188 (7)0.07441 (10)0.58486 (7)0.02041 (19)
H40.7324 (11)0.0420 (15)0.6319 (10)0.023 (3)*
C60.43206 (7)0.19283 (10)0.53119 (7)0.01892 (19)
H60.4204 (11)0.1750 (15)0.5844 (11)0.027 (4)*
C70.36277 (8)0.24697 (10)0.45998 (7)0.0194 (2)
H70.3036 (12)0.2722 (14)0.4624 (11)0.025 (4)*
C80.38134 (7)0.26697 (10)0.38121 (7)0.01831 (19)
H80.3372 (10)0.3074 (14)0.3314 (10)0.020 (3)*
C130.55136 (6)0.53447 (10)0.26577 (6)0.01663 (18)
C140.58663 (7)0.66724 (10)0.27693 (6)0.01791 (18)
C150.50000.75179 (14)0.25000.0172 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mn10.01278 (11)0.02053 (12)0.01434 (11)0.0000.00330 (8)0.000
O10.0128 (3)0.0224 (4)0.0243 (4)0.0014 (3)0.0017 (3)−0.0019 (3)
O20.0147 (3)0.0294 (4)0.0350 (4)−0.0044 (3)0.0041 (3)−0.0040 (3)
O30.0248 (5)0.0215 (5)0.0198 (5)0.0000.0083 (4)0.000
N10.0156 (4)0.0193 (4)0.0190 (4)0.0014 (3)0.0061 (3)0.0006 (3)
N20.0132 (4)0.0201 (4)0.0156 (4)0.0011 (3)0.0031 (3)0.0006 (3)
C10.0192 (5)0.0234 (5)0.0236 (5)0.0032 (4)0.0094 (4)0.0018 (4)
C20.0167 (4)0.0249 (5)0.0301 (5)0.0047 (4)0.0090 (4)0.0017 (4)
C30.0147 (4)0.0218 (5)0.0256 (5)0.0033 (3)0.0034 (4)0.0011 (4)
C100.0144 (4)0.0173 (4)0.0193 (4)0.0003 (3)0.0025 (3)−0.0004 (3)
C90.0136 (4)0.0160 (4)0.0175 (4)−0.0001 (3)0.0037 (3)−0.0007 (3)
C110.0130 (4)0.0167 (4)0.0160 (4)−0.0004 (3)0.0030 (3)−0.0010 (3)
C120.0155 (4)0.0186 (4)0.0155 (4)−0.0010 (3)0.0032 (3)−0.0021 (3)
C50.0198 (4)0.0228 (5)0.0147 (4)0.0001 (4)0.0027 (3)−0.0005 (3)
C40.0174 (4)0.0219 (5)0.0176 (4)0.0012 (3)0.0003 (3)0.0003 (3)
C60.0179 (4)0.0228 (5)0.0161 (4)−0.0019 (4)0.0060 (3)−0.0030 (4)
C70.0150 (4)0.0239 (5)0.0196 (5)0.0005 (3)0.0064 (4)−0.0022 (3)
C80.0138 (4)0.0220 (5)0.0181 (5)0.0012 (3)0.0040 (3)0.0002 (3)
C130.0119 (4)0.0230 (4)0.0134 (4)−0.0001 (3)0.0023 (3)−0.0011 (3)
C140.0139 (4)0.0232 (5)0.0157 (4)−0.0009 (3)0.0040 (3)−0.0018 (3)
C150.0150 (6)0.0234 (6)0.0130 (6)0.0000.0046 (5)0.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Mn1—O12.2163 (8)C10—C91.4091 (13)
Mn1—O1i2.2163 (8)C10—C41.4333 (15)
Mn1—N22.2222 (9)C9—C111.4433 (13)
Mn1—N2i2.2222 (9)C11—C121.4080 (13)
Mn1—N1i2.2807 (9)C12—C61.4134 (13)
Mn1—N12.2807 (9)C12—C51.4383 (13)
O1—C131.2668 (12)C5—C41.3587 (15)
O2—C141.2323 (12)C5—H50.934 (17)
O3—C151.2287 (18)C4—H40.931 (15)
N1—C11.3322 (13)C6—C71.3750 (15)
N1—C91.3607 (13)C6—H60.947 (16)
N2—C81.3321 (13)C7—C81.4015 (15)
N2—C111.3621 (12)C7—H70.934 (17)
C1—C21.4055 (15)C8—H80.945 (14)
C1—H10.944 (16)C13—C13i1.4412 (18)
C2—C31.3709 (16)C13—C141.4637 (14)
C2—H20.982 (17)C14—C151.4989 (13)
C3—C101.4143 (14)C15—C14i1.4989 (13)
C3—H30.943 (15)
O1—Mn1—O1i77.48 (4)N1—C9—C10123.29 (9)
O1—Mn1—N2105.44 (3)N1—C9—C11117.77 (8)
O1i—Mn1—N287.91 (3)C10—C9—C11118.94 (9)
O1—Mn1—N2i87.91 (3)N2—C11—C12122.72 (9)
O1i—Mn1—N2i105.44 (3)N2—C11—C9117.44 (9)
N2—Mn1—N2i163.06 (5)C12—C11—C9119.84 (8)
O1—Mn1—N1i149.62 (3)C11—C12—C6117.37 (9)
O1i—Mn1—N1i84.13 (3)C11—C12—C5119.60 (9)
N2—Mn1—N1i97.74 (3)C6—C12—C5123.03 (9)
N2i—Mn1—N1i73.85 (3)C4—C5—C12120.61 (9)
O1—Mn1—N184.13 (3)C4—C5—H5122.0 (10)
O1i—Mn1—N1149.62 (3)C12—C5—H5117.3 (10)
N2—Mn1—N173.85 (3)C5—C4—C10120.87 (9)
N2i—Mn1—N197.74 (3)C5—C4—H4120.5 (9)
N1i—Mn1—N1121.66 (5)C10—C4—H4118.6 (9)
C13—O1—Mn1109.53 (6)C7—C6—C12119.42 (9)
C1—N1—C9117.82 (9)C7—C6—H6121.0 (9)
C1—N1—Mn1127.48 (7)C12—C6—H6119.5 (9)
C9—N1—Mn1114.11 (6)C6—C7—C8119.34 (10)
C8—N2—C11118.35 (9)C6—C7—H7122.2 (10)
C8—N2—Mn1125.26 (7)C8—C7—H7118.5 (10)
C11—N2—Mn1116.32 (7)N2—C8—C7122.73 (10)
N1—C1—C2122.87 (10)N2—C8—H8114.7 (9)
N1—C1—H1117.6 (9)C7—C8—H8122.5 (9)
C2—C1—H1119.5 (9)O1—C13—C13i121.73 (5)
C3—C2—C1119.50 (10)O1—C13—C14128.51 (8)
C3—C2—H2120.6 (10)C13i—C13—C14109.76 (5)
C1—C2—H2119.9 (10)O2—C14—C13127.67 (10)
C2—C3—C10119.33 (9)O2—C14—C15126.27 (10)
C2—C3—H3123.1 (9)C13—C14—C15106.06 (8)
C10—C3—H3117.5 (9)O3—C15—C14i125.82 (6)
C9—C10—C3117.18 (9)O3—C15—C14125.82 (6)
C9—C10—C4120.06 (9)C14i—C15—C14108.36 (12)
C3—C10—C4122.76 (9)
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Mn(C5O5)(C12H8N2)2]
Mr555.40
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)14.9185 (6), 10.3749 (4), 16.0859 (6)
β (°) 109.885 (1)
V (Å3)2341.30 (16)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm−1)0.62
Crystal size (mm)0.44 × 0.33 × 0.22
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens SMART 1K CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2006)
Tmin, Tmax0.617, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections		16256, 3356, 3214
Rint0.020
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.703
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.026, 0.081, 1.06
No. of reflections3356
No. of parameters210
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.50, −0.22

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1997), SAINT (Bruker, 1999), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997).

 

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 50673054 and 20472044).

References

First citationBruker (1997). SMART (Version 5.054) and SHELXTL (Version 5.10). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationBruker (1999). SAINT. Version 6.01. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationBruker (2006). SADABS. Version 2006/1. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationChen, X., Chen, H.-F., Xue, G., Chen, H.-Y., Yu, W.-T. & Fang, Q. (2007). Acta Cryst. C63, m166–m168.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationChen, H.-Y., Fang, Q., Xue, G. & Yu, W.-T. (2005). Acta Cryst. C61, m535–m537.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationCoronado, E., Curreli, S., Giménez-Saiz, C., Gómez-García, C.-J., Deplano, P., Mercuri, M.-L., Serpe, A., Pilia, L., Faulmann, C. & Canadell, E. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 4446–4457.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationMaji, T. K., Konar, S., Mostafa, G., Zangrando, E., Lu, T.-H. & Chaudhuri, N. R. (2003). Dalton Trans. pp. 171–175.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar
 First citationSletten, J., Daraghmeh, H., Lloret, F. & Julve, M. (1998). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 279, 127–135.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationWang, C. C., Yang, C.-H. & Lee, G.-H. (2002). Inorg. Chem. 41, 1015–1018.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 64| Part 1| January 2008| Page m172
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807065841
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS