organic compounds
1-Methyl-6-nitro-1H-benzimidazole
aFaculty of Food and Chemical Technology, Slovak Technical University, Radlinskeho 9, SK-81237 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, and bFaculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University, Odbojarov 10, SK-83232 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
*Correspondence e-mail: kettmann@fpharm.uniba.sk
The title compound, C8H7N3O2, a potential antitumour drug and an antioxidant agent, was studied in order to give more insight into structure–function relationships. The 1-methylbenzimidazole unit of the molecule was found to be exactly planar and the nitro group is inclined at an angle of 10.4 (2)° to the plane of the heterocycle. The bond lengths in the present derivative were analyzed in details and compared with those of the parent unsubstituted analogues in the Cambridge Structural Database. The results have shown that the additional nitro group is not involved in conjugation with the adjacent π-system and hence has no effect on the charge distribution of the heterocyclic ring.
Related literature
For related literature on related crystal structures, see for example: Türktekin et al., (2004) as retrieved from the Cambridge Structural Database (Version of 2007; Allen, 2002). For the synthesis, see: Ellis & Jones (1974). For the length of the pure Csp2—Nsp2 single bond, see: Adler et al. (1976). For related literature on biological aspects of the benzimidazole derivatives in general, see: Alpan et al. (2007); Kettmann et al. (2004); Le et al. (2004); Nguyen et al. (2004); Statkova-Abeghe et al. (2005). Antioxidant properties of the compound are discussed by Hanus et al. (2004); Katuščák (2003).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection
|
Refinement
|
|
Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1991); cell XSCANS; data reduction: XSCANS; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536808005886/nc2091sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808005886/nc2091Isup2.hkl
The synthesis of the title compound, (I), was described earlier (Ellis & Jones, 1974). In short, a solution of formaldehyde (4 g, 0.133 mol) in absolute ethanol (40 ml) was heated under reflux for 30 min with commercially available 4-nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine (7.1 g, 0.046 mol) and concentrated hydrochloric acid (3 ml). On basification with ammonia, (I) was obtained as yellow crystals (25% yield; m.p. 454–456 K).
H atoms were visible in difference maps but were placed in calculated positions and were refined isotropic (Uiso of the H atoms were set to 1.2 (1.5 for the methyl H atoms) times Ueq of the parent atom) using a riding model with C—H = 0.93 Å (CHarom) and 0.96 Å (CH3).
Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1991); cell
XSCANS (Siemens, 1991); data reduction: XSCANS (Siemens, 1991); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).Fig. 1. Displacement ellipsoid plot of the title molecule with the labelling scheme for the non-H atoms, which are drawn as 35% probability ellipsoids. |
C8H7N3O2 | Dx = 1.470 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 177.17 | Melting point: 455 K |
Orthorhombic, Pbca | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2ab | Cell parameters from 20 reflections |
a = 12.852 (3) Å | θ = 7–19° |
b = 7.043 (2) Å | µ = 0.11 mm−1 |
c = 17.690 (4) Å | T = 296 K |
V = 1601.2 (7) Å3 | Prism, yellow |
Z = 8 | 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm |
F(000) = 736 |
Siemens P4 diffractometer | Rint = 0.035 |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 2.3° |
Graphite monochromator | h = −1→18 |
ω/2θ scans | k = −1→9 |
3027 measured reflections | l = −24→1 |
2325 independent reflections | 3 standard reflections every 97 reflections |
1493 reflections with I > 2σ(I) | intensity decay: none |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.130 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.96 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0722P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2325 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.002 |
119 parameters | Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 |
C8H7N3O2 | V = 1601.2 (7) Å3 |
Mr = 177.17 | Z = 8 |
Orthorhombic, Pbca | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 12.852 (3) Å | µ = 0.11 mm−1 |
b = 7.043 (2) Å | T = 296 K |
c = 17.690 (4) Å | 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm |
Siemens P4 diffractometer | Rint = 0.035 |
3027 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 97 reflections |
2325 independent reflections | intensity decay: none |
1493 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.130 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.96 | Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3 |
2325 reflections | Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 |
119 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
N1 | 0.42194 (9) | 0.26257 (16) | 0.47003 (6) | 0.0416 (3) | |
C2 | 0.52515 (10) | 0.2941 (2) | 0.45973 (9) | 0.0497 (4) | |
H2 | 0.5525 | 0.3360 | 0.4140 | 0.060* | |
N3 | 0.58338 (9) | 0.26080 (19) | 0.51910 (7) | 0.0532 (3) | |
C4 | 0.53023 (11) | 0.1419 (2) | 0.64798 (8) | 0.0553 (4) | |
H4 | 0.5968 | 0.1419 | 0.6686 | 0.066* | |
C5 | 0.44659 (12) | 0.0845 (2) | 0.68983 (8) | 0.0544 (4) | |
H5 | 0.4561 | 0.0432 | 0.7393 | 0.065* | |
C6 | 0.34599 (10) | 0.08772 (19) | 0.65813 (7) | 0.0425 (3) | |
C7 | 0.32568 (9) | 0.14664 (19) | 0.58497 (7) | 0.0390 (3) | |
H7 | 0.2587 | 0.1496 | 0.5650 | 0.047* | |
C8 | 0.41167 (10) | 0.20061 (17) | 0.54376 (7) | 0.0374 (3) | |
C9 | 0.51357 (10) | 0.20067 (19) | 0.57335 (8) | 0.0444 (3) | |
C10 | 0.33948 (11) | 0.2912 (3) | 0.41540 (9) | 0.0555 (4) | |
H10A | 0.3428 | 0.4185 | 0.3962 | 0.083* | |
H10B | 0.2733 | 0.2711 | 0.4393 | 0.083* | |
H10C | 0.3476 | 0.2029 | 0.3745 | 0.083* | |
N4 | 0.25815 (11) | 0.03037 (18) | 0.70486 (7) | 0.0499 (3) | |
O1 | 0.16986 (9) | 0.0586 (2) | 0.68211 (6) | 0.0653 (3) | |
O2 | 0.27589 (11) | −0.0462 (2) | 0.76606 (6) | 0.0721 (4) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
N1 | 0.0348 (5) | 0.0474 (6) | 0.0425 (6) | −0.0030 (4) | −0.0002 (4) | 0.0008 (5) |
C2 | 0.0376 (7) | 0.0532 (8) | 0.0583 (8) | −0.0041 (6) | 0.0085 (6) | −0.0036 (7) |
N3 | 0.0334 (6) | 0.0599 (8) | 0.0663 (8) | −0.0019 (5) | 0.0008 (5) | −0.0071 (6) |
C4 | 0.0428 (7) | 0.0662 (9) | 0.0570 (8) | 0.0084 (7) | −0.0178 (6) | −0.0072 (8) |
C5 | 0.0592 (9) | 0.0607 (9) | 0.0434 (7) | 0.0103 (7) | −0.0138 (7) | −0.0029 (7) |
C6 | 0.0460 (7) | 0.0436 (7) | 0.0379 (6) | 0.0027 (6) | −0.0017 (5) | −0.0048 (5) |
C7 | 0.0350 (6) | 0.0417 (6) | 0.0404 (6) | 0.0007 (5) | −0.0039 (5) | −0.0044 (6) |
C8 | 0.0349 (6) | 0.0376 (6) | 0.0398 (6) | 0.0011 (5) | −0.0036 (5) | −0.0046 (5) |
C9 | 0.0348 (6) | 0.0450 (7) | 0.0535 (8) | 0.0029 (5) | −0.0055 (6) | −0.0089 (6) |
C10 | 0.0477 (8) | 0.0748 (10) | 0.0441 (7) | −0.0036 (7) | −0.0071 (6) | 0.0084 (7) |
N4 | 0.0605 (8) | 0.0515 (7) | 0.0377 (6) | −0.0001 (6) | 0.0029 (5) | −0.0052 (5) |
O1 | 0.0503 (6) | 0.0928 (9) | 0.0527 (6) | −0.0051 (6) | 0.0055 (5) | 0.0053 (6) |
O2 | 0.0891 (10) | 0.0851 (9) | 0.0420 (6) | 0.0051 (7) | 0.0043 (6) | 0.0149 (6) |
N1—C2 | 1.3571 (17) | C6—C7 | 1.3840 (19) |
N1—C8 | 1.3817 (17) | C6—N4 | 1.4563 (18) |
N1—C10 | 1.4483 (18) | C7—C8 | 1.3775 (18) |
C2—N3 | 1.3107 (19) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
C2—H2 | 0.9300 | C8—C9 | 1.4104 (17) |
N3—C9 | 1.3803 (18) | C10—H10A | 0.9600 |
C4—C5 | 1.366 (2) | C10—H10B | 0.9600 |
C4—C9 | 1.4001 (19) | C10—H10C | 0.9600 |
C4—H4 | 0.9300 | N4—O1 | 1.2202 (16) |
C5—C6 | 1.4095 (19) | N4—O2 | 1.2308 (16) |
C5—H5 | 0.9300 | ||
C2—N1—C8 | 105.76 (11) | C8—C7—H7 | 122.4 |
C2—N1—C10 | 127.08 (12) | C6—C7—H7 | 122.4 |
C8—N1—C10 | 127.15 (11) | C7—C8—N1 | 131.56 (12) |
N3—C2—N1 | 114.93 (13) | C7—C8—C9 | 123.28 (12) |
N3—C2—H2 | 122.5 | N1—C8—C9 | 105.17 (11) |
N1—C2—H2 | 122.5 | N3—C9—C4 | 130.31 (13) |
C2—N3—C9 | 103.93 (12) | N3—C9—C8 | 110.22 (12) |
C5—C4—C9 | 118.57 (13) | C4—C9—C8 | 119.46 (13) |
C5—C4—H4 | 120.7 | N1—C10—H10A | 109.5 |
C9—C4—H4 | 120.7 | N1—C10—H10B | 109.5 |
C4—C5—C6 | 120.08 (13) | H10A—C10—H10B | 109.5 |
C4—C5—H5 | 120.0 | N1—C10—H10C | 109.5 |
C6—C5—H5 | 120.0 | H10A—C10—H10C | 109.5 |
C7—C6—C5 | 123.36 (13) | H10B—C10—H10C | 109.5 |
C7—C6—N4 | 117.89 (12) | O1—N4—O2 | 122.26 (14) |
C5—C6—N4 | 118.74 (12) | O1—N4—C6 | 119.23 (12) |
C8—C7—C6 | 115.24 (11) | O2—N4—C6 | 118.50 (13) |
C8—N1—C2—N3 | −0.55 (16) | C10—N1—C8—C9 | −178.72 (13) |
C10—N1—C2—N3 | 178.49 (14) | C2—N3—C9—C4 | 178.82 (15) |
N1—C2—N3—C9 | 0.52 (16) | C2—N3—C9—C8 | −0.29 (15) |
C9—C4—C5—C6 | −0.9 (2) | C5—C4—C9—N3 | −178.51 (14) |
C4—C5—C6—C7 | 0.2 (2) | C5—C4—C9—C8 | 0.5 (2) |
C4—C5—C6—N4 | −178.40 (14) | C7—C8—C9—N3 | 179.82 (12) |
C5—C6—C7—C8 | 0.9 (2) | N1—C8—C9—N3 | −0.02 (15) |
N4—C6—C7—C8 | 179.47 (11) | C7—C8—C9—C4 | 0.6 (2) |
C6—C7—C8—N1 | 178.54 (13) | N1—C8—C9—C4 | −179.25 (12) |
C6—C7—C8—C9 | −1.26 (19) | C7—C6—N4—O1 | −9.28 (19) |
C2—N1—C8—C7 | −179.50 (14) | C5—C6—N4—O1 | 169.38 (13) |
C10—N1—C8—C7 | 1.5 (2) | C7—C6—N4—O2 | 170.32 (13) |
C2—N1—C8—C9 | 0.32 (14) | C5—C6—N4—O2 | −11.02 (19) |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C8H7N3O2 |
Mr | 177.17 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Pbca |
Temperature (K) | 296 |
a, b, c (Å) | 12.852 (3), 7.043 (2), 17.690 (4) |
V (Å3) | 1601.2 (7) |
Z | 8 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.11 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.15 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Siemens P4 diffractometer |
Absorption correction | – |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3027, 2325, 1493 |
Rint | 0.035 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.703 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.045, 0.130, 0.96 |
No. of reflections | 2325 |
No. of parameters | 119 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.18, −0.15 |
Computer programs: XSCANS (Siemens, 1991), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2003).
N1—C2 | 1.3571 (17) | C5—C6 | 1.4095 (19) |
N1—C8 | 1.3817 (17) | C6—C7 | 1.3840 (19) |
C2—N3 | 1.3107 (19) | C6—N4 | 1.4563 (18) |
N3—C9 | 1.3803 (18) | C7—C8 | 1.3775 (18) |
C4—C5 | 1.366 (2) | C8—C9 | 1.4104 (17) |
C4—C9 | 1.4001 (19) |
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic (project Nos. 1/4298/07 and 1/0225/08) as well as by the Science and Technology Assistance Agency (APVV-20–007304). The authors also thank the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic (contract No. 2003SP200280301).
References
Adler, R. W., Goode, N. C., King, T. S., Mellor, J. M. & Miller, B. W. (1976). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. pp. 173–174. Google Scholar
Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst, B58, 380–388. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Alpan, A. S., Gunesi, H. S. & Topcu, Z. (2007). Acta Biochim. Pol. 54, 561–565. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ellis, G. P. & Jones, R. T. (1974). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, pp. 903–909. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Hanus, J., Katuščák, S., Katuščák, D., Bukovský, V. & Rychlý, J. (2004). Proceedings of the International Conference on Durability of Paper and Writing, Ljubljana, Slovenia, p. 86. Google Scholar
Katuščák, S. (2003). Chemical Technology of Wood, Pulp and Paper in Culture, Education and Industry, edited by G. Baudin, J. Fellegi, B. Gollerstedt, S. Katuščák, I. Pikulik & J. Paris, pp. 27–34. Bratislava: Slovak Technical University. Google Scholar
Kettmann, V., Košťálová, D. & Holtje, H.-D. (2004). J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 18, 785–797. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Le, H. T., Lemaire, I. B., Gilbert, A. K., Jolicoeur, F., Yang, L., Leduc, N. & Lemaire, S. (2004). J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 309, 146–155. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Nguyen, D. M., Schrump, W. D., Chen, G. A., Tsal, W., Nguyen, P., Trepel, J. B. & Schrump, D. S. (2004). Clin. Cancer Res. 10,1813–1825. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Siemens (1991). XSCANS. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7–13. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Statkova-Abeghe, S., Ivanova, I., Daskalova, S. & Dzhambazov, B. (2005). Med. Chem. Res. 14, 429–439. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Türktekin, S., Akkurt, M., Şireci, N., Küçükbay, H. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, o817–o819. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Benzimidazole derivatives are known to possess a variety of biological properties (Le et al., 2004), the anti-cancer activity being one of the most important (Nguyen et al., 2004). Recently, it has been reported that the cytotoxic activity of 1H-benzimidazoles is related to inhibition of the DNA-topoisomerase binary complex and is potentiated by introduction to the 6-position of a small substituent containing an oxygen atom able to accept a hydrogen bond (e.g. nitro, acetyl, amide) (Alpan et al., 2007; Statkova-Abeghe et al., 2005). It was, however, unclear whether the influence of the substituents reflects their effect on the charge distribution of the heterocycle or results from interaction of the substituents with additional DNA or enzyme functionalities. Consequently, we prepared a series of 6-substituted 1-methylbenzimidazoles and determined and compared their molecular and electronic structures by using theoretical and experimental techniques. In this communication we report the crystal structure of the 6-nitro derivative, (I). Another point of interest in (I) stems from its use in paper processing as an antioxidant agent (Katuščák, 2003; Hanus et al., 2004), a property which is also dependent on the molecular and electronic structures of the compound.
As expected, the 1-methylbenzimidazole substructure is planar to within experimental error and the nitro group is rotated by 10.4 (2)° from the plane of the heterocycle (Fig.1).
As mentioned above, the main purpose of this work was to compare precise molecular dimensions in the present derivative, (I), with those of the unsubstituted 1-methylbenzimidazole. As the latter compound has no entry in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version of 2007; Allen & Kennard, 1983), the CSD was searched for compounds possessing the benzimidazole nucleus and just 1-substituent with methylene group in the α-position; 42 such compounds [hereafter (II)] were found. The comparison have shown that the corresponding bond lengths in the benzimidazole heterocycle in (I) and in the molecules of (II) are equal within the limits of experimental error. This, along with the single-bond character of C6—N4 (Adler et al., 1976) indicates that the nitro group is deconjugated with the benzimidazole ring. This implies that the large difference in cytotoxic activities between (I) and (II) lies in the interaction of the 6-substituent with additional DNA intercalation component or enzyme amino acid residues which surrounds the intercalation site (Kettmann et al., 2004). These results will serve as a basis for subsequent molecular-modelling studies of the DNA-enzyme-ligand interactions.