organic compounds
Dimethyl 2-(aminomethylene)malonate
aInstitute of Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology, Radlinského 9, SK-812 37 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, and bInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Catalysis and Petrochemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology, Radlinského 9, Bratislava 81237, Slovak Republic
*Correspondence e-mail: martin.grof@stuba.sk
In the title compound, C6H9NO4, which is an example of a push–pull alkene, N—H⋯O interactions stabilize the crystal structure.
Related literature
For related literature, see: Bouzard (1990); Chemla & Zyss (1987); Cook (1969); Freeman (1981); Nalwa et al. (1997); Shmueli et al. (1973).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); cell CrysAlis CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1998); software used to prepare material for publication: enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004).
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536808012762/bt2703sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808012762/bt2703Isup2.hkl
To dimethyl 3-methoxymethylenemalonate (1.74 g, 10 mmol) in methanol (10 ml), an aqueous solution of ammonia (12 mmol) was added dropwise (amount according to concentration and density) over a period of 30 min with stirring. The slightly warmed mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then briefly heated to reflux (ca. 20 min). After ensuring that no starting derivative remained (thin-layer
Silufol 254, Kavalier Czechoslovakia; chloroform-methanol 10:1 v/v, detection UV light 254 nm), the reaction mixture was evaporated on a vacuum evaporator and chromatographed on silica gel (eluent dichloromethane-methanol 10:1 v/v). Obtained product was recrystallized from minimal amount of chloroform and n-hexane mixture in refrigerator.The solid phase mid-IR vibrational spectrum was recorded with a Nicolet model NEXUS 470 FTIR spectrometer at room temperature. The measurement was performed after mixing the powdered sample with KBr into a pellet.
The mid-IR vibrational frequencies of aminomethylene-malonic acid dimethyl ester are (in cm-1): 3460 w; 3358 s; 3296 vw; 3271 vw; 3222 s; 3135 w, sh; 3025 m; 3017 vw, sh; 2993 vw; 2962 m; 2924 vw; 2907 vw; 1683 vs; 1658 vs; 1637 vs; 1576 vw, sh; 1534 m; 1507 s; 1499 s; 1474 vw, sh; 1461 w, sh; 1440 s; 1433 w, sh; 1373 s; 1331 s; 1293 w; 1286 s; 1221 s; 1193 m; 1176 w, sh; 1150 w, sh; 1141 s; 1070 s, b; 1033 w; 982 m; 942 w; 828 w; 822 m; 783 s; 772 w; 750 vw; 715 s, b; 669 w; 649 w, b; 617 m, sh, b; 589 s; 480 s; 440 m.
All H atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their corresponding parent atoms at distances of Cmethyl-H = 0.96Å, Caromatic-H = 0.93Å and N-H =0.86 Å, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C,N) or Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(Cmethyl). Methyl groups were allowed to rotate but not to tip.
Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); cell
CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1998); software used to prepare material for publication: enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004).C6H9NO4 | F(000) = 336 |
Mr = 159.14 | Dx = 1.411 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 2135 reflections |
a = 9.3410 (19) Å | θ = 3.4–29.6° |
b = 6.9000 (14) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
c = 11.725 (2) Å | T = 100 K |
β = 97.58 (3)° | Block, colorless |
V = 749.1 (3) Å3 | 0.43 × 0.27 × 0.06 mm |
Z = 4 |
Oxford Diffraction GEMINI R diffractometer | 1368 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 841 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.089 |
Rotation method data acquisition using ω and ϕ scans | θmax = 25.3°, θmin = 4.2° |
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006) | h = −10→11 |
Tmin = 0.892, Tmax = 0.998 | k = −8→8 |
14185 measured reflections | l = −14→14 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.091 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.261 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.99 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1927P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1368 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.005 |
102 parameters | Δρmax = 0.62 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.38 e Å−3 |
C6H9NO4 | V = 749.1 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 159.14 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 9.3410 (19) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
b = 6.9000 (14) Å | T = 100 K |
c = 11.725 (2) Å | 0.43 × 0.27 × 0.06 mm |
β = 97.58 (3)° |
Oxford Diffraction GEMINI R diffractometer | 1368 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006) | 841 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.892, Tmax = 0.998 | Rint = 0.089 |
14185 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.091 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.261 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.99 | Δρmax = 0.62 e Å−3 |
1368 reflections | Δρmin = −0.38 e Å−3 |
102 parameters |
Experimental. face-indexed (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006) |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O4 | 0.9175 (3) | 0.2420 (3) | 0.85543 (19) | 0.0639 (9) | |
O2 | 0.8250 (3) | −0.0207 (4) | 0.92664 (19) | 0.0657 (9) | |
C3 | 0.8357 (3) | 0.1536 (5) | 0.9256 (3) | 0.0475 (9) | |
N1 | 0.7287 (3) | 0.6345 (4) | 1.0263 (3) | 0.0648 (10) | |
H1B | 0.6717 | 0.6127 | 1.0768 | 0.078* | |
H1A | 0.7486 | 0.7517 | 1.0089 | 0.078* | |
C2 | 0.7644 (3) | 0.2942 (5) | 0.9935 (3) | 0.0460 (9) | |
C4 | 0.7847 (4) | 0.4902 (5) | 0.9761 (3) | 0.0511 (9) | |
H4A | 0.8455 | 0.5225 | 0.9222 | 0.061* | |
C5 | 0.9912 (5) | 0.1154 (5) | 0.7845 (3) | 0.0685 (12) | |
H5C | 1.0455 | 0.1916 | 0.7368 | 0.082* | |
H5B | 0.9216 | 0.0384 | 0.7368 | 0.082* | |
H5A | 1.0555 | 0.0319 | 0.8327 | 0.082* | |
O1 | 0.6120 (3) | 0.3524 (4) | 1.1347 (2) | 0.0773 (10) | |
O3 | 0.6559 (3) | 0.0457 (3) | 1.0934 (2) | 0.0594 (8) | |
C1 | 0.6714 (4) | 0.2365 (5) | 1.0780 (3) | 0.0515 (10) | |
C6 | 0.5661 (4) | −0.0100 (6) | 1.1793 (3) | 0.0705 (12) | |
H6C | 0.5600 | −0.1487 | 1.1824 | 0.085* | |
H6B | 0.4711 | 0.0433 | 1.1596 | 0.085* | |
H6A | 0.6075 | 0.0385 | 1.2531 | 0.085* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O4 | 0.0949 (19) | 0.0289 (14) | 0.0785 (17) | −0.0010 (12) | 0.0514 (14) | −0.0019 (11) |
O2 | 0.094 (2) | 0.0233 (15) | 0.0884 (18) | −0.0009 (11) | 0.0449 (15) | 0.0022 (11) |
C3 | 0.065 (2) | 0.027 (2) | 0.0544 (18) | −0.0036 (14) | 0.0236 (16) | 0.0017 (13) |
N1 | 0.090 (2) | 0.0235 (17) | 0.088 (2) | −0.0033 (14) | 0.0392 (18) | −0.0022 (14) |
C2 | 0.057 (2) | 0.0255 (17) | 0.0580 (18) | −0.0039 (14) | 0.0172 (16) | 0.0018 (14) |
C4 | 0.067 (2) | 0.0299 (19) | 0.0601 (18) | −0.0043 (15) | 0.0210 (17) | 0.0008 (15) |
C5 | 0.099 (3) | 0.037 (2) | 0.079 (2) | 0.0036 (19) | 0.049 (2) | 0.0008 (18) |
O1 | 0.111 (2) | 0.0312 (15) | 0.104 (2) | −0.0012 (13) | 0.0689 (17) | −0.0028 (13) |
O3 | 0.0900 (18) | 0.0217 (14) | 0.0756 (15) | −0.0054 (10) | 0.0445 (13) | 0.0026 (10) |
C1 | 0.062 (2) | 0.030 (2) | 0.066 (2) | −0.0002 (14) | 0.0221 (17) | −0.0043 (14) |
C6 | 0.101 (3) | 0.039 (2) | 0.081 (2) | −0.012 (2) | 0.047 (2) | 0.0024 (19) |
O4—C3 | 1.342 (4) | C5—H5C | 0.9600 |
O4—C5 | 1.442 (4) | C5—H5B | 0.9600 |
O2—C3 | 1.206 (4) | C5—H5A | 0.9600 |
C3—C2 | 1.470 (4) | O1—C1 | 1.219 (4) |
N1—C4 | 1.301 (4) | O3—C1 | 1.340 (4) |
N1—H1B | 0.8600 | O3—C6 | 1.445 (4) |
N1—H1A | 0.8600 | C6—H6C | 0.9600 |
C2—C4 | 1.385 (5) | C6—H6B | 0.9600 |
C2—C1 | 1.456 (5) | C6—H6A | 0.9600 |
C4—H4A | 0.9300 | ||
C3—O4—C5 | 115.6 (3) | H5C—C5—H5B | 109.5 |
O2—C3—O4 | 120.9 (3) | O4—C5—H5A | 109.5 |
O2—C3—C2 | 127.5 (3) | H5C—C5—H5A | 109.5 |
O4—C3—C2 | 111.6 (3) | H5B—C5—H5A | 109.5 |
C4—N1—H1B | 120.0 | C1—O3—C6 | 116.0 (3) |
C4—N1—H1A | 120.0 | O1—C1—O3 | 120.4 (3) |
H1B—N1—H1A | 120.0 | O1—C1—C2 | 123.1 (3) |
C4—C2—C1 | 118.3 (3) | O3—C1—C2 | 116.5 (3) |
C4—C2—C3 | 119.0 (3) | O3—C6—H6C | 109.5 |
C1—C2—C3 | 122.8 (3) | O3—C6—H6B | 109.5 |
N1—C4—C2 | 127.6 (3) | H6C—C6—H6B | 109.5 |
N1—C4—H4A | 116.2 | O3—C6—H6A | 109.5 |
C2—C4—H4A | 116.2 | H6C—C6—H6A | 109.5 |
O4—C5—H5C | 109.5 | H6B—C6—H6A | 109.5 |
O4—C5—H5B | 109.5 | ||
C5—O4—C3—O2 | −0.8 (5) | C3—C2—C4—N1 | 178.6 (3) |
C5—O4—C3—C2 | −179.6 (3) | C6—O3—C1—O1 | 0.1 (5) |
O2—C3—C2—C4 | −176.8 (3) | C6—O3—C1—C2 | 178.6 (3) |
O4—C3—C2—C4 | 1.9 (4) | C4—C2—C1—O1 | −0.8 (5) |
O2—C3—C2—C1 | 2.5 (5) | C3—C2—C1—O1 | 180.0 (3) |
O4—C3—C2—C1 | −178.8 (3) | C4—C2—C1—O3 | −179.2 (3) |
C1—C2—C4—N1 | −0.7 (6) | C3—C2—C1—O3 | 1.5 (5) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1B···O1 | 0.86 | 2.03 | 2.638 (2) | 128 |
N1—H1A···O2i | 0.86 | 2.02 | 2.848 (2) | 161 |
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C6H9NO4 |
Mr | 159.14 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 100 |
a, b, c (Å) | 9.3410 (19), 6.9000 (14), 11.725 (2) |
β (°) | 97.58 (3) |
V (Å3) | 749.1 (3) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.12 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.43 × 0.27 × 0.06 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Oxford Diffraction GEMINI R diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Analytical (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.892, 0.998 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 14185, 1368, 841 |
Rint | 0.089 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.602 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.091, 0.261, 0.99 |
No. of reflections | 1368 |
No. of parameters | 102 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.62, −0.38 |
Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1998), enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1B···O1 | 0.86 | 2.025 | 2.638 (2) | 127.5 |
N1—H1A···O2i | 0.86 | 2.022 | 2.848 (2) | 160.8 |
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z. |
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic, grant Nos. APVT-20–007304 and VEGA 1/0817/08, for support.
References
Allen, F. H., Johnson, O., Shields, G. P., Smith, B. R. & Towler, M. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 335–338. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bouzard, D. (1990). Recent Progress in the Chemical Synthesis of Antibiotics, p. 249. München: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (1998). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Chemla, D. & Zyss, J. (1987). Optical Properties of Organic Molecules and Crystals, Vol. 1, pp. 23–187. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Cook, A. G. (1969). Enamines: Syntheses, Structure and Reactions. New York: Marcel Dekker. Google Scholar
Freeman, F. (1981). LONZA Reaction of Malononitrile Derivatives, p. 925. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag. Google Scholar
Nalwa, H. S., Watanabe, T. & Miyata, S. (1997). Nonlinear Optics of Organic Molecules and Polymers, pp. 87–329. Boca Ranton: CRC Press. Google Scholar
Oxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Shmueli, U., Shanan-Atidi, H., Horwitz, H. & Shvo, Y. (1973). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 657–662. CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The title compound (I), aminomethylene-malonic acid dimethyl ester belongs to the family of so-called push-pull ethylenes. Push-pull ethylenes with the general formula R1X—CR2=CR3R4 are highly reactive organic compounds with electron donor groups at one end and strong electron acceptor groups at the other end of ethylenic C=C double bond. Very often R2 = H and for X = NH or NR1 and X = O as the electron donor groups R1 can be hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl or hetero(aryl) groups. On the other side as the electron acceptors R3, R4 are groups such as –CN, –COR, –COOR, –SO2CH3, and –NO2. Mainly enamines (X = NH, NR1) are frequently used as reactants or intermediates in chemical syntheses of drugs, polymers and dyes (Bouzard et al., 1990, Cook et al., 1969). But also alkoxymethylenes (X = O) are often used in organic synthesis (Freeman et al., 1981).
Due to the opposite character of the substituents, the olefinic C=C double bond order is reduced and accompanied by increased bond orders of bonds between the olefinic carbon atoms and their electron donor and electron acceptor groups. This leads to the substantial decrease of the rotational barrier about the C=C double bond and to the increase of an analogues barrier about the adjacent bonds. These changes are connected with the separation of positive and negative charges and electron delocalization within the π-electron system. Such compounds belong to the most developed structures in the search for new compounds with non-linear optics responses (Nalwa et al., 1997, Chemla et al., 1987).
The study of a similar compound, dimethyl-(dimethylaminomethylene)-malonate, has been done (Shmueli et al., 1973). This study revealed that dimethyl-(dimethylaminomethylene)-malonate exists in solid phase as ZE conformer (Z denotes towards to C=C double bond orientation of the carbonyl oxygen in trans position; E denotes away from C=C double bond orientation of the carbonyl oxygen in cis position). The study of aminomethylene-malonic acid dimethyl ester revealed that this compound exists in solid phase as EZ conformer. The =C—N bond length of 1.301 (4)Å in the title compound is somewhat shorter than in the case of dimethyl-(dimethylaminomethylene)-malonate (1.337 Å). The C=C bond length of 1.385 (5)Å is slightly longer than in the case of dimethyl-(dimethylaminomethylene)-malonate (1.380 Å). The =C—C trans and cis bond lengths are 1.470 (4)/1.456 (5)Å, respectively in the title compound and 1.442/1.488 Å in dimethyl-(dimethylaminomethylene)-malonate.