Disodium zinc bis­(sulfate) tetra­hydrate (zinc astrakanite) revisited

Díaz de Vivar, M.E.; Baggio, S.; Ibáñez, A.; Baggio, R.

doi:10.1107/S1600536808009719

inorganic compounds

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 64| Part 6| June 2008| Pages i30-i31

doi:10.1107/S1600536808009719

Open

access

Disodium zinc bis(sulfate) tetrahydrate (zinc astrakanite) revisited

M. Enriqueta Díaz de Vivar,^a ^* Sergio Baggio,^a Andrés Ibáñez ^b and Ricardo Baggio ^c

^aUniversidad Nacional de la Patagonia, Sede Puerto Madryn, and CenPat, CONICET, 9120 Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina, ^bDepartamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile, and CIMAT, Casilla 487-3, Santiago de Chile, Chile, and ^cDepartamento de Física, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
^*Correspondence e-mail: undiaz@cenpat.edu.ar

(Received 7 March 2008; accepted 8 April 2008; online 7 May 2008)

We present a new low-temperature refinement of disodium zinc bis(sulfate) tetrahydrate {systematic name: poly[tetra-μ-aqua-di-μ-sulfato-zinc(II)disodium(I)]}, [Na₂Zn(SO₄)₂(H₂O)₄]_n or Zn astrakanite, which is an upgrade of previously reported data [Bukin & Nozik (1974 ). Zh. Strukt. Khim. 15, 712–716]. The compound is part of an isostructural family containing the Mg (the original astrakanite mineral), Co and Ni species. The very regular ZnO(aqua)₄O(sulfate)₂ octahedra lie on centres of symmetry, while the rather distorted NaO(aqua)₂O(sulfate)₄ octahedra appear at general positions, linked into a three-dimensional network by the bridging water molecules and the fully coordinated sulfate groups.

Related literature

For related literature, see: Rumanova (1958 ); Giglio (1958 ); Bukin & Nozik (1974, 1975 ); Díaz de Vivar et al. (2006 ).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Na₂Zn(SO₄)₂(H₂O)₄]
M_r = 375.53
Monoclinic, P 2₁ /c
a = 5.5075 (2) Å
b = 8.2127 (3) Å
c = 11.0559 (4) Å
β = 99.958 (10)°
V = 492.54 (3) Å³
Z = 2
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 3.07 mm⁻¹
T = 170 (2) K
0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ) T_min = 0.452, T_max = 0.728
3533 measured reflections
1080 independent reflections
1062 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R_int = 0.012

Refinement

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.017
wR(F²) = 0.054
S = 1.00
1080 reflections
96 parameters
6 restraints
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max = 0.29 e Å⁻³
Δρ_min = −0.53 e Å⁻³

Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å)

Zn1—O1W	2.0636 (11)
Zn1—O3	2.0952 (11)
Zn1—O2W	2.1285 (11)
Na1—O2ⁱ	2.3603 (12)
Na1—O4ⁱⁱ	2.3786 (12)
Na1—O1	2.4016 (12)
Na1—O1W	2.4017 (12)
Na1—O2ⁱⁱⁱ	2.4224 (13)
Na1—O2W^iv	2.5694 (13)
Symmetry codes: (i) $[x, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (ii) $[-x+1, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (iii) $[-x, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (iv) $[-x, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ .

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
O1W—H1WA⋯O1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.800 (17)	1.916 (17)	2.6977 (17)	165 (3)
O1W—H1WB⋯O4^v	0.832 (16)	1.901 (16)	2.7288 (17)	173 (2)
O2W—H2WA⋯O1ⁱⁱ	0.826 (16)	2.051 (18)	2.8468 (16)	162 (2)
O2W—H2WB⋯O4^vi	0.805 (16)	2.15 (2)	2.8779 (16)	151 (3)
Symmetry codes: (ii) $[-x+1, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (iii) $[-x, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (v) x-1, y, z; (vi) -x+1, -y, -z.

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001 ); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2003 ).

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808009719/fi2061sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808009719/fi2061Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report

Comment top

The original mineral astrakanite [Na₂M(SO₄)₂(H₂O)₄], M = Mg, structurally characterized almost 50 years ago (Rumanova, 1958), gave its name to a whole isostructural family, of which some members have been known for a long while (M = Zn, Giglio, 1958; Bukin & Nozik, 1974; M = Co, Bukin & Nozik, 1975), while the Ni analogue has been only recently reported, (Díaz de Vivar et al., 2006). We present herein an improved, low temperature data refinement of the zinc member of the group, Na₂Zn(SO₄)₂(H₂O)₄ (I), unwittingly obtained as a byproduct while looking for something else (See experimental section).

Fig. 1 shows the asymmetric unit of (I) as well as part of its close environment, and Table 1 presents some selected bond distances. The structure consists of ZnO(aqua)₄O(sulf)₂ and NaO(aqua)₂O(sulf)₄ octahedra in a 1:2 ratio, linked through two bridging water molecules (O1W, O2W) and the fully coordinated sulfato groups.

Zn cations lay on centers of symmetry and their coordination polyhedra defined by O3, O1w, O2w and their respective centrosymmetric counterparts are quite regular, possibly due to the large number of geometrically unconstrained aqua molecules (Parameters range: Zn—O,2.0636 (11)–2.1285 (11) Å; (O—Zn—O)_cis, 87.38 (5)–92.62 (5)°; (O—Zn—O)_trans, 180.°, fixed by symmetry). Na cations, instead, occupy general positions and, contrasting the former, their O(sulf)-rich coordination octahedra appear as quite irregular (Parameters range: Na—O,2.3603 (12)–2.5694 (13) Å; (O—Na—O)_cis, 74.93 (4)–112.94 (4)°; (O—Na—O)_trans, 155.87 (5)–162.11 (5)°).

The geometry of the sulfate anion is rather regular, with S—O distances in the range 1.4619 (11) to 1.4878 (11) Å and angles from 107.38 (5) to 110.89 (7)°. The group exhibits a complex µ₅-κ⁴-O:O':O'':O''' coordination, binding in a monocoordinated fashion to Zn through O3 and to Na through O1 and O4, while bridging two Na cations through O2. The result of this intricate interconnectivity is the formation of broad two-dimensional structures parallel to (100) containing both types of polyhedra (Fig.1) and internally linked by the two bridging aqua and O atoms O1, O2 and O3 from the sulfate anion.

These "planes", in turn, are interconnected along a single "strong" interaction, the O4—Na1 bonds between sulfate O4 atoms from a given layer and Na1 cations from their neighbours (Fig. 2).

Also H-bonding interactions (Table 2) contribute to the intraplane (via O1W, entries 1 and 2) and interplane (via O2W, entries 3 and 4) cohesion.

It is worth noting that O1 and O4 act as the only (double) acceptors for H-bonding. In analyzing the S—O bond lengths, it appears that S1—O1 and S1—O4 present precisely the longest distances suggesting a slight weakening effect on the S—O covalent link due to the oxygen involvement in H interactions.

Even though the isostructural character of (I) with the rest of the strakanite family is obvious by inspection, the low precision with which the Mn and Co members have been reported leaves comparison with the Ni moiety as the only relevant one. In this respect, both structures are almost undistinguishable, as proved by the least squares fit of the extended group shown in Fig. 3, where the maximum departure amounts for less than 0.05Å for atom O2W.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Rumanova (1958); Giglio (1958); Bukin & Nozik (1974, 1975); Díaz de Vivar et al. (2006).

Experimental top

The compound was obtained an an unintended product in a synthesis of Zn(II) complexes. Recently prepared anysaldehyde bisulfitic derivative (60 mg) were dissolved in 5 ml of water and mixed with an aqueous solution of Zn acetate (112 mg/5 ml). The aqueous mixture was left in a methanol atmosphere, until colourless cubic crystals were obtained.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Figures top

	Fig. 1. A (100) view of the structure with the independent atoms drawn in full 50% displacemenet ellipsoids and full bonds. The symmetry related part, in open ellipsoids and hollow bonds. Hydrogen interactions drawn in broken lines. Symmetry codes: (i) x, -y + 1/2, z + 1/2; (ii) -x + 1, y - 1/2, -z + 1/2; (iii) -x, y - 1/2, -z + 1/2; (iv) -x, y + 1/2, -z + 1/2. (v) x - 1, y, z; (vi) -x + 1, -y, -z; (vii) -x, -y, -z.
	Fig. 2. Packing view down the <010> direction showing a side view of the planar structures, and the way they interact through the O4—Na1 bonds along [100]. H-bonds omited in this view, for clarity.
	Fig. 3. Least squares fit of an extended atomic group in (I), in full lining, and its Ni counterpart (Díaz de Vivar et al., 2006), in dashed lining. Note the almost perfect overlap of both structures.

poly[tetra-µ-aqua-di-µ–sulfato-zinc(II)disodium(I)] top

Crystal data top

[Na₂Zn(SO₄)₂(H₂O)₄]	F(000) = 376
M_r = 375.53	D_x = 2.539 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, P2₁/c	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc	Cell parameters from 3942 reflections
a = 5.5075 (2) Å	θ = 3.8–26.7°
b = 8.2127 (3) Å	µ = 3.07 mm⁻¹
c = 11.0559 (4) Å	T = 170 K
β = 99.958 (1)°	Prism, colourless
V = 492.54 (3) Å³	0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 2

Data collection top

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer	1080 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	1062 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.012
ϕ and ω scans	θ_max = 27.9°, θ_min = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)	h = −6→7
T_min = 0.452, T_max = 0.728	k = −10→10
3533 measured reflections	l = −13→14

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.017	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F²) = 0.054	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0408P)² + 0.265P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
S = 1.00	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
1080 reflections	Δρ_max = 0.29 e Å⁻³
96 parameters	Δρ_min = −0.53 e Å⁻³
6 restraints	Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc^*=kFc[1+0.001xFc²λ³/sin(2θ)]^-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods	Extinction coefficient: 0.080 (4)

Crystal data top

[Na₂Zn(SO₄)₂(H₂O)₄]	V = 492.54 (3) Å³
M_r = 375.53	Z = 2
Monoclinic, P2₁/c	Mo Kα radiation
a = 5.5075 (2) Å	µ = 3.07 mm⁻¹
b = 8.2127 (3) Å	T = 170 K
c = 11.0559 (4) Å	0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
β = 99.958 (1)°

Data collection top

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer	1080 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)	1062 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
T_min = 0.452, T_max = 0.728	R_int = 0.012
3533 measured reflections

Refinement top

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.017	6 restraints
wR(F²) = 0.054	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.00	Δρ_max = 0.29 e Å⁻³
1080 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.53 e Å⁻³
96 parameters

Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Zn1	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.00887 (13)
Na1	0.12607 (11)	0.07173 (8)	0.36217 (5)	0.01231 (17)
S1	0.37405 (6)	0.28842 (4)	0.13609 (3)	0.00821 (14)
O1	0.3516 (2)	0.27120 (14)	0.26765 (10)	0.0127 (2)
O2	0.2085 (2)	0.41630 (14)	0.07871 (10)	0.0136 (3)
O3	0.3186 (2)	0.13129 (14)	0.07174 (10)	0.0134 (2)
O4	0.63500 (19)	0.32955 (13)	0.13056 (10)	0.0127 (2)
O1W	−0.1247 (2)	0.03807 (16)	0.16331 (10)	0.0110 (2)
O2W	0.1753 (2)	−0.21442 (13)	0.08065 (10)	0.0115 (2)
H1WA	−0.215 (5)	−0.032 (3)	0.179 (2)	0.028 (7)*
H1WB	−0.207 (4)	0.123 (2)	0.156 (2)	0.023 (6)*
H2WA	0.299 (4)	−0.203 (3)	0.1341 (18)	0.021 (6)*
H2WB	0.213 (5)	−0.278 (3)	0.032 (2)	0.034 (7)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Zn1	0.01021 (18)	0.00753 (17)	0.00909 (17)	−0.00024 (7)	0.00231 (11)	−0.00054 (7)
Na1	0.0133 (3)	0.0116 (3)	0.0118 (3)	−0.0002 (2)	0.0015 (2)	0.0005 (2)
S1	0.0083 (2)	0.0075 (2)	0.0089 (2)	0.00016 (12)	0.00150 (13)	−0.00049 (12)
O1	0.0156 (6)	0.0130 (5)	0.0101 (5)	0.0014 (4)	0.0034 (4)	0.0013 (4)
O2	0.0149 (5)	0.0139 (6)	0.0119 (5)	0.0051 (4)	0.0017 (4)	0.0017 (4)
O3	0.0111 (5)	0.0109 (5)	0.0179 (5)	−0.0016 (4)	0.0022 (4)	−0.0054 (4)
O4	0.0103 (5)	0.0110 (5)	0.0176 (5)	−0.0021 (4)	0.0042 (4)	−0.0016 (4)
O1W	0.0114 (5)	0.0098 (5)	0.0122 (5)	0.0000 (4)	0.0035 (4)	0.0002 (4)
O2W	0.0120 (5)	0.0100 (5)	0.0118 (5)	0.0007 (4)	−0.0002 (4)	−0.0017 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Zn1—O1Wⁱ	2.0636 (11)	Na1—O2W^v	2.5694 (13)
Zn1—O1W	2.0636 (11)	Na1—Na1^vi	3.7507 (12)
Zn1—O3	2.0952 (11)	S1—O2	1.4619 (11)
Zn1—O3ⁱ	2.0952 (11)	S1—O3	1.4797 (11)
Zn1—O2W	2.1285 (11)	S1—O1	1.4876 (11)
Zn1—O2Wⁱ	2.1285 (11)	S1—O4	1.4878 (11)
Na1—O2ⁱⁱ	2.3603 (12)	O1W—H1WA	0.800 (17)
Na1—O4ⁱⁱⁱ	2.3786 (12)	O1W—H1WB	0.832 (16)
Na1—O1	2.4016 (12)	O2W—H2WA	0.826 (16)
Na1—O1W	2.4017 (12)	O2W—H2WB	0.805 (16)
Na1—O2^iv	2.4224 (13)

O1Wⁱ—Zn1—O1W	180.00 (9)	O1—Na1—O2W^v	92.61 (4)
O1Wⁱ—Zn1—O3	91.46 (4)	O1W—Na1—O2W^v	90.58 (4)
O1W—Zn1—O3	88.54 (4)	O2^iv—Na1—O2W^v	74.93 (4)
O1Wⁱ—Zn1—O3ⁱ	88.54 (4)	O2—S1—O3	110.89 (7)
O1W—Zn1—O3ⁱ	91.46 (4)	O2—S1—O1	109.97 (6)
O3—Zn1—O3ⁱ	180.00 (8)	O3—S1—O1	110.00 (7)
O1Wⁱ—Zn1—O2W	92.62 (5)	O2—S1—O4	110.71 (7)
O1W—Zn1—O2W	87.38 (5)	O3—S1—O4	107.38 (6)
O3—Zn1—O2W	88.72 (4)	O1—S1—O4	107.81 (7)
O3ⁱ—Zn1—O2W	91.28 (4)	S1—O1—Na1	128.83 (7)
O1Wⁱ—Zn1—O2Wⁱ	87.38 (5)	S1—O2—Na1^vii	117.79 (6)
O1W—Zn1—O2Wⁱ	92.62 (5)	S1—O2—Na1^v	135.07 (7)
O3—Zn1—O2Wⁱ	91.28 (4)	Na1^vii—O2—Na1^v	103.29 (4)
O3ⁱ—Zn1—O2Wⁱ	88.72 (4)	S1—O3—Zn1	136.09 (7)
O2W—Zn1—O2Wⁱ	180.00 (7)	S1—O4—Na1^viii	136.15 (7)
O2ⁱⁱ—Na1—O4ⁱⁱⁱ	89.56 (4)	Zn1—O1W—Na1	126.34 (5)
O2ⁱⁱ—Na1—O1	112.94 (4)	Zn1—O1W—H1WA	113 (2)
O4ⁱⁱⁱ—Na1—O1	105.09 (4)	Na1—O1W—H1WA	99.6 (19)
O2ⁱⁱ—Na1—O1W	155.87 (5)	Zn1—O1W—H1WB	107.7 (17)
O4ⁱⁱⁱ—Na1—O1W	99.32 (5)	Na1—O1W—H1WB	102.0 (17)
O1—Na1—O1W	86.50 (4)	H1WA—O1W—H1WB	106 (2)
O2ⁱⁱ—Na1—O2^iv	76.71 (4)	Zn1—O2W—Na1^iv	113.77 (5)
O4ⁱⁱⁱ—Na1—O2^iv	89.57 (4)	Zn1—O2W—H2WA	117.7 (16)
O1—Na1—O2^iv	162.11 (5)	Na1^iv—O2W—H2WA	112.8 (17)
O1W—Na1—O2^iv	80.94 (4)	Zn1—O2W—H2WB	114.1 (18)
O2ⁱⁱ—Na1—O2W^v	75.00 (4)	Na1^iv—O2W—H2WB	89 (2)
O4ⁱⁱⁱ—Na1—O2W^v	160.12 (5)	H2WA—O2W—H2WB	106 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (iii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (v) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (vi) −x, −y, −z+1; (vii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (viii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
O1W—H1WA···O1^iv	0.80 (2)	1.92 (2)	2.6977 (17)	165 (3)
O1W—H1WB···O4^ix	0.83 (2)	1.90 (2)	2.7288 (17)	173 (2)
O2W—H2WA···O1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.83 (2)	2.05 (2)	2.8468 (16)	162 (2)
O2W—H2WB···O4^x	0.81 (2)	2.15 (2)	2.8779 (16)	151 (3)

Symmetry codes: (iii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ix) x−1, y, z; (x) −x+1, −y, −z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	[Na₂Zn(SO₄)₂(H₂O)₄]
M_r	375.53
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, P2₁/c
Temperature (K)	170
a, b, c (Å)	5.5075 (2), 8.2127 (3), 11.0559 (4)
β (°)	99.958 (1)
V (Å³)	492.54 (3)
Z	2
Radiation type	Mo Kα
µ (mm⁻¹)	3.07
Crystal size (mm)	0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
T_min, T_max	0.452, 0.728
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	3533, 1080, 1062
R_int	0.012
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.658

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.017, 0.054, 1.00
No. of reflections	1080
No. of parameters	96
No. of restraints	6
H-atom treatment	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.29, −0.53

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2001), SAINT (Bruker, 2001), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Selected bond lengths (Å) top

Zn1—O1W	2.0636 (11)	Na1—O1	2.4016 (12)
Zn1—O3	2.0952 (11)	Na1—O1W	2.4017 (12)
Zn1—O2W	2.1285 (11)	Na1—O2ⁱⁱⁱ	2.4224 (13)
Na1—O2ⁱ	2.3603 (12)	Na1—O2W^iv	2.5694 (13)
Na1—O4ⁱⁱ	2.3786 (12)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
O1W—H1WA···O1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.800 (17)	1.916 (17)	2.6977 (17)	165 (3)
O1W—H1WB···O4^v	0.832 (16)	1.901 (16)	2.7288 (17)	173 (2)
O2W—H2WA···O1ⁱⁱ	0.826 (16)	2.051 (18)	2.8468 (16)	162 (2)
O2W—H2WB···O4^vi	0.805 (16)	2.15 (2)	2.8779 (16)	151 (3)

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (v) x−1, y, z; (vi) −x+1, −y, −z.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Spanish Research Council (CSIC) for providing a free-of-charge licence to the Cambridge Structural Database (Allen, 2002 ).

References

Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bruker (2001). SMART and SAINT for Windows NT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bukin, V. I. & Nozik, Yu. Z. (1974). Zh. Strukt. Khim. 15, 712–716. CAS Google Scholar
Bukin, V. I. & Nozik, Yu. Z. (1975). Kristallografiya, 20, 293–296. CAS Google Scholar
Díaz de Vivar, M. E. de, Baggio, S., Garland, M. T. & Baggio, R. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, i196–i198. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Giglio, M. (1958). Naturwissenschaften, 45, 82–83. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rumanova, I. M. (1958). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 118, 84–87. CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7–13. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar