organic compounds
cis-9,10-Bis(bromomethyl)-1,4,5,8-tetraoxadecalin
aDepartment of Chemistry, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: djones@uncc.edu, metzkorn@uncc.edu
The title compound, C8H12Br2O4, is a bicyclic ketal in which the two six-membered rings are cis to one another and assume a double-chair conformation. A crystallographic twofold axis bisects the molecule.
Related literature
A determination of this structure has been previously attempted (Fuchs et al., 1972), but the authors did not publish or deposit any atomic coordinates. The same paper gives detailed information for a related structure which has H atoms in place of the bromomethyl groups of the title compound. A search of the Cambridge Structural Database [Version 5.29; (Allen, 2002); CONQUEST (Bruno et al., 2002)] did not yield any other closely related structures. See also: Fuchs (1970).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection
Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: DIRDIF (Beurskens et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536808015377/fj2094sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808015377/fj2094Isup2.hkl
The title compound 3 has been described as the major reaction product in the acid-catalyzed reaction of diketone 1 with ethylene glycol (Fuchs, 1970). Since the dispiro derivative 2 was needed for one of our projects, literature procedures (Fuchs et al., 1972) were followed to yield a product mixture from which only the bicyclic title compound 3 could be isolated, as colorless crystals. The NMR data obtained for 3 deviated from the published data (Fuchs, 1970), and the X-ray structure was therefore determined to ultimately confirm the formation of 3.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 4.14 (mc, 4H), 3.75 (mc, 4H), 3.69 (s, 4H) p.p.m..
13C NMR (CDCl3, 125.7 MHz): δ = 92.3, 61.1, 31.6 p.p.m..
All H atoms were constrained using a riding model. C — H bond lengths were fixed at 0.97 Å, with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq. (C).
Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell
CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: DIRDIF (Beurskens et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).Fig. 1. View of the title compound, 3, with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. [Symmetry code: (') -x + 1/2, -y + 1, z.] | |
Fig. 2. Schematic representations of compounds 1–4. |
C8H12Br2O4 | F(000) = 648 |
Mr = 332 | Dx = 2.065 Mg m−3 |
Orthorhombic, Pnca | Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2a 2n | Cell parameters from 23 reflections |
a = 8.5314 (14) Å | θ = 9.7–23.5° |
b = 9.5295 (7) Å | µ = 9.57 mm−1 |
c = 13.1348 (13) Å | T = 295 K |
V = 1067.9 (2) Å3 | Irregular, colorless |
Z = 4 | 0.5 × 0.3 × 0.15 mm |
Enra–Nonius CAD4 diffractometer | 915 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.063 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 67.6°, θmin = 5.7° |
Non–profiled ω/2θ scans | h = −10→10 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (Blessing, 1995) | k = −11→0 |
Tmin = 0.039, Tmax = 0.486 | l = −15→15 |
4584 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 67 reflections |
968 independent reflections | intensity decay: 3% |
Refinement on F2 | H-atom parameters constrained |
Least-squares matrix: full | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0428P)2 + 0.7055P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
wR(F2) = 0.101 | Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 |
S = 1.10 | Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 |
968 reflections | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
65 parameters | Extinction coefficient: 0.0045 (3) |
0 restraints |
C8H12Br2O4 | V = 1067.9 (2) Å3 |
Mr = 332 | Z = 4 |
Orthorhombic, Pnca | Cu Kα radiation |
a = 8.5314 (14) Å | µ = 9.57 mm−1 |
b = 9.5295 (7) Å | T = 295 K |
c = 13.1348 (13) Å | 0.5 × 0.3 × 0.15 mm |
Enra–Nonius CAD4 diffractometer | 915 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (Blessing, 1995) | Rint = 0.063 |
Tmin = 0.039, Tmax = 0.486 | 3 standard reflections every 67 reflections |
4584 measured reflections | intensity decay: 3% |
968 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.101 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.10 | Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 |
968 reflections | Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 |
65 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Br | 0.12607 (5) | 0.16873 (4) | 0.02778 (4) | 0.0766 (3) | |
O2 | 0.0390 (2) | 0.4700 (2) | 0.13501 (17) | 0.0603 (6) | |
O1 | 0.2328 (3) | 0.3492 (2) | 0.21071 (17) | 0.0605 (6) | |
C4 | 0.2152 (4) | 0.3552 (3) | 0.0252 (2) | 0.0588 (8) | |
H4A | 0.3256 | 0.3483 | 0.0083 | 0.071* | |
H4B | 0.1644 | 0.4092 | −0.028 | 0.071* | |
C3 | 0.0090 (4) | 0.5542 (4) | 0.2241 (3) | 0.0672 (9) | |
H3A | 0.0354 | 0.5012 | 0.2848 | 0.081* | |
H3B | −0.1015 | 0.5779 | 0.2273 | 0.081* | |
C1 | 0.1982 (3) | 0.4327 (3) | 0.1255 (2) | 0.0545 (7) | |
C2 | 0.3958 (4) | 0.3150 (4) | 0.2203 (3) | 0.0680 (10) | |
H2A | 0.4284 | 0.2583 | 0.1628 | 0.082* | |
H2B | 0.4125 | 0.2609 | 0.2819 | 0.082* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Br | 0.0951 (5) | 0.0623 (4) | 0.0725 (4) | −0.00632 (17) | −0.00192 (18) | −0.00707 (17) |
O2 | 0.0530 (11) | 0.0674 (14) | 0.0606 (12) | 0.0026 (10) | 0.0035 (10) | −0.0047 (11) |
O1 | 0.0656 (13) | 0.0620 (13) | 0.0539 (12) | 0.0008 (10) | −0.0008 (11) | 0.0060 (10) |
C4 | 0.0597 (18) | 0.0570 (18) | 0.060 (2) | 0.0007 (14) | 0.0019 (14) | −0.0019 (14) |
C3 | 0.0648 (19) | 0.073 (2) | 0.064 (2) | 0.0056 (16) | 0.0107 (17) | −0.0070 (17) |
C1 | 0.0510 (15) | 0.0600 (19) | 0.0525 (17) | 0.0049 (13) | 0.0015 (13) | −0.0006 (13) |
C2 | 0.072 (2) | 0.069 (2) | 0.063 (2) | 0.0096 (16) | −0.0108 (17) | 0.0074 (17) |
Br—C4 | 1.933 (3) | C4—H4B | 0.97 |
O2—C1 | 1.409 (4) | C3—C2i | 1.489 (5) |
O2—C3 | 1.442 (4) | C3—H3A | 0.97 |
O1—C1 | 1.404 (4) | C3—H3B | 0.97 |
O1—C2 | 1.434 (4) | C1—C1i | 1.558 (6) |
C4—C1 | 1.518 (4) | C2—H2A | 0.97 |
C4—H4A | 0.97 | C2—H2B | 0.97 |
C1—O2—C3 | 112.5 (2) | H3A—C3—H3B | 108.2 |
C1—O1—C2 | 113.7 (3) | O1—C1—O2 | 105.9 (2) |
C1—C4—Br | 113.2 (2) | O1—C1—C4 | 113.3 (3) |
C1—C4—H4A | 108.9 | O2—C1—C4 | 107.0 (3) |
Br—C4—H4A | 108.9 | O1—C1—C1i | 110.3 (2) |
C1—C4—H4B | 108.9 | O2—C1—C1i | 109.8 (3) |
Br—C4—H4B | 108.9 | C4—C1—C1i | 110.3 (2) |
H4A—C4—H4B | 107.7 | O1—C2—C3i | 110.0 (3) |
O2—C3—C2i | 110.0 (3) | O1—C2—H2A | 109.7 |
O2—C3—H3A | 109.7 | C3i—C2—H2A | 109.7 |
C2i—C3—H3A | 109.7 | O1—C2—H2B | 109.7 |
O2—C3—H3B | 109.7 | C3i—C2—H2B | 109.7 |
C2i—C3—H3B | 109.7 | H2A—C2—H2B | 108.2 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C8H12Br2O4 |
Mr | 332 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Pnca |
Temperature (K) | 295 |
a, b, c (Å) | 8.5314 (14), 9.5295 (7), 13.1348 (13) |
V (Å3) | 1067.9 (2) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Cu Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 9.57 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.5 × 0.3 × 0.15 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Enra–Nonius CAD4 diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (Blessing, 1995) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.039, 0.486 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 4584, 968, 915 |
Rint | 0.063 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.600 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.036, 0.101, 1.10 |
No. of reflections | 968 |
No. of parameters | 65 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.45, −0.43 |
Computer programs: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994), XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995), DIRDIF (Beurskens et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by funds provided by the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
References
Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Beurskens, P. T., Beurskens, G., de Gelder, R., Garciía-Granda, S., Gould, R. O., Israel, R. & Smits, J. M. M. (1999). The DIRDIF99 program system. Technical Report of the Crystallography Laboratory, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389–397. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Enraf–Nonius (1994). CAD-4 EXPRESS. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fuchs, B. (1970). Tetrahedron Lett. 20, 1747–1750. CrossRef Google Scholar
Fuchs, B., Goldberg, I. & Shmueli, U. (1972). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 357–365. CrossRef Google Scholar
Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4. University of Marburg, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The title compound is a bicyclic ketal in which the two six-membered rings are cis to one another and assume a doublechair conformation. A crystallographic twofold axis relates one of the fused rings to the other.
A determination of this structure has been previously attempted (Fuchs et al., 1972), but the authors did not publish or deposit any atomic coordinates. They halted their study after three cycles of isotropic refinement because "···the accuracy of the atomic parameters was relatively low." They did present the Fourier map resulting from the isotropic refinement, and it shows an overall structure in agreement with that presented here. The space group and unit-cell parameters which they obtained are also in agreement with those of the present study.
The authors of this prior study attributed the "relatively low" accuracy of their atomic parameters to the domination of the scattering by the Br atoms. Our present study suggests that the importance of absorption corrections probably played a part as well.
The same paper (Fuchs et al., 1972) gives detailed structural information for a related compound which has hydrogen atoms in place of the bromomethyl groups of the title compound. That structure is similar to the one reported here, in that the two six-membered rings are cis to one another and assume a doublechair conformation.