metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Bis{2-[(2-cyano­phen­yl)imino­meth­yl]phenolato}copper(II)

aOrdered Matter Science Research Center, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: xuhj@seu.edu.cn

(Received 5 August 2008; accepted 20 October 2008; online 13 November 2008)

In the title mononuclear copper(II) complex, [Cu(C14H9N2O)2], the CuII atom, situated on an inversion centre, shows a slightly distorted square-planar geometry and is coordinated by the N and O atoms from two deprotonated symmetry-related Schiff base ligands. The Cu—N and Cu—O bond lengths are 2.009 (2) and 1.888 (2) Å, respectively. The dihedral angle between the cyano­phenyl rings and phenolate rings is 42.28 (13)°.

Related literature

For Schiff base complexes with copper(II) and nickel(II), see: Gong et al. (2008[Gong, X.-X., Xia, R. & Xu, H.-J. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, m494.]); Kitaura et al. (2004[Kitaura, R., Onoyama, G., Sakamoto, H., Matsuda, R., Noro, S. & Kitagawa, S. (2004). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 2684-2687.]); Marganian et al. (1995[Marganian, C. A., Vazir, H., Baidya, N., Olmstead, M. M. & Mascharak, P. K. (1995). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 1584-1594.]). For bond-length data, see: Jian et al. (2004[Jian, F.-F., Li, L., Sun, P.-P. & Xiao, H.-L. (2004). Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 20, 1295-1298.]); Ünver (2002[Ünver, H. (2002). J. Mol. Struct. 641, 35-40.]). For a related structure, see: Xia et al. (2008[Xia, R., Xu, H.-J. & Gong, X.-X. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o1047.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • [Cu(C14H9N2O)2]

  • Mr = 506.00

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 9.698 (3) Å

  • b = 11.403 (3) Å

  • c = 10.889 (3) Å

  • β = 107.570 (11)°

  • V = 1148.0 (6) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.99 mm−1

  • T = 293 (2) K

  • 0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm

Data collection
  • Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005[Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.]) Tmin = 0.909, Tmax = 1.000 (expected range = 0.824–0.906)

  • 11307 measured reflections

  • 2629 independent reflections

  • 1952 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.057

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050

  • wR(F2) = 0.125

  • S = 1.09

  • 2629 reflections

  • 160 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005[Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.]); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

Metal derivatives of Schiff bases have been studied extensively, and copper(II) and nickel(II) complexes play an important role in both synthetic and structural research. These complexes have received much attention in recent years (Marganian et al., 1995; Kitaura et al. 2004). We have reported previously the crystal structures of monomeric Schiff base complexes of NiII (Gong et al., 2008). As an a continuation of our research on the synthesis and structure of transition metal complexesof Schiff base compounds, we here report the results of the reaction of copper(II) with the didentate ligand 2-(2-cyanophenyliminomethyl)phenol, forming the title compound (I).

Fig.1 shows the molecular structure of the title compound. The copper(II) is coordinated by the two imine N and two phenolate O atoms of the two Schiff base ligands in a slightly distorted square-planar geometry in a trans arrangement. 2-(2-cyanophenyliminomethyl)phenol loses a proton form the hydroxyl group and acts as a singlely charged bidentate ligand coordinating to Copper(II) through the phenolate O and imine N atoms. The dihedral angle between the C1—C6 and C8—C13 benzene rings is 42.28 (0.13)°. The N1—Cu1—O1 bond angles is 90.78 (9)°. The two equivalent Cu–N and Cu–O distances are 2.009 (2)Å and 1.888 (2) Å, respectively. All these parameters conform to values in other square-planar-coordinated copper(II) compounds(Jian et al., 2004; Ünver 2002).

Related literature top

For Schiff base complexes with copper(II) and nickel(II), see: Gong et al. (2008); Kitaura et al. (2004); Marganian et al. (1995). For bond-length data, see: Jian et al. (2004); Ünver (2002). For a related structure, see: Xia et al. (2008).

Experimental top

2-(2-Cyanophenyliminomethyl)phenol was prepared according to the literature(Xia et al., 2008).CuCl2.2H2O(17. mg, 0.1 mmol) in methanol (5 ml) was added to the solution of 2-(2-cyanophenyliminomethyl)phenol (22.2 mg, 0.1 mmol)in the methanol (5 ml), pH of themixture was adjusted to 8–9 and stirred for 4 h. The filtrate was kept at room temperature for about two weeks, and green block crystals of (I) for X-ray single-crystal investigation were obtained.

Refinement top

All H atoms attached to C atoms were fixed geometrically and treated as riding with C—H = 0.93 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular view of the title compound with the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii. [Symmetry code: (i) 2 - x, 1 - y, -z]
Bis{2-[(2-cyanophenyl)iminomethyl]phenolato}copper(II) top
Crystal data top
[Cu(C14H9N2O)2]F(000) = 518
Mr = 506.00Dx = 1.464 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2373 reflections
a = 9.698 (3) Åθ = 3.1–27.4°
b = 11.403 (3) ŵ = 0.99 mm1
c = 10.889 (3) ÅT = 293 K
β = 107.570 (11)°Block, red
V = 1148.0 (6) Å30.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
2629 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1952 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.057
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scansh = 1212
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
k = 1414
Tmin = 0.909, Tmax = 1.000l = 1414
11307 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.125H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0516P)2 + 0.2943P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2629 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
160 parametersΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Cu(C14H9N2O)2]V = 1148.0 (6) Å3
Mr = 506.00Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 9.698 (3) ŵ = 0.99 mm1
b = 11.403 (3) ÅT = 293 K
c = 10.889 (3) Å0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
β = 107.570 (11)°
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
2629 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
1952 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.909, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.057
11307 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0500 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.125H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09Δρmax = 0.26 e Å3
2629 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
160 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu11.00000.50000.00000.03878 (18)
N10.9612 (2)0.6674 (2)0.0368 (2)0.0383 (5)
O11.0810 (2)0.46983 (18)0.1778 (2)0.0469 (5)
C80.8569 (3)0.7359 (3)0.0563 (3)0.0400 (6)
C11.1420 (3)0.6686 (3)0.2473 (3)0.0416 (7)
C71.0377 (3)0.7214 (3)0.1397 (3)0.0416 (7)
H7A1.02340.80180.14390.050*
C90.7154 (3)0.6925 (3)0.1043 (3)0.0469 (7)
C21.1568 (3)0.5450 (3)0.2631 (3)0.0403 (7)
C41.3310 (4)0.5785 (3)0.4717 (3)0.0587 (9)
H4A1.39380.54790.54710.070*
C61.2221 (3)0.7432 (3)0.3469 (3)0.0535 (8)
H6A1.20980.82390.33730.064*
C130.8922 (4)0.8413 (3)0.1019 (3)0.0507 (8)
H13A0.98520.87150.06980.061*
C140.6811 (3)0.5801 (3)0.0602 (3)0.0539 (8)
C100.6108 (4)0.7564 (4)0.1967 (3)0.0624 (10)
H10A0.51620.72910.22700.075*
C120.7880 (5)0.9012 (3)0.1957 (4)0.0670 (10)
H12A0.81260.97110.22800.080*
C51.3176 (4)0.6996 (3)0.4574 (3)0.0601 (9)
H5A1.37200.74960.52110.072*
C31.2547 (4)0.5035 (3)0.3782 (3)0.0507 (8)
H3A1.26780.42310.39090.061*
N20.6591 (4)0.4905 (3)0.0242 (4)0.0716 (9)
C110.6491 (5)0.8599 (4)0.2422 (4)0.0729 (12)
H11A0.58050.90210.30490.087*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0424 (3)0.0348 (3)0.0347 (3)0.0037 (2)0.0050 (2)0.0003 (2)
N10.0399 (13)0.0373 (13)0.0349 (12)0.0036 (10)0.0069 (10)0.0010 (10)
O10.0581 (14)0.0381 (12)0.0378 (12)0.0047 (9)0.0046 (10)0.0004 (8)
C80.0428 (16)0.0400 (16)0.0340 (15)0.0077 (12)0.0066 (12)0.0006 (12)
C10.0385 (16)0.0445 (17)0.0373 (16)0.0018 (12)0.0044 (12)0.0004 (12)
C70.0445 (17)0.0332 (15)0.0433 (16)0.0020 (12)0.0074 (13)0.0001 (12)
C90.0429 (18)0.0526 (19)0.0407 (17)0.0068 (14)0.0059 (13)0.0004 (14)
C20.0407 (17)0.0443 (16)0.0349 (15)0.0040 (13)0.0098 (13)0.0009 (12)
C40.050 (2)0.073 (3)0.0432 (19)0.0075 (17)0.0005 (15)0.0027 (16)
C60.058 (2)0.0493 (19)0.0458 (19)0.0028 (15)0.0038 (15)0.0048 (14)
C130.057 (2)0.0476 (18)0.0479 (19)0.0047 (15)0.0162 (15)0.0054 (14)
C140.0386 (18)0.071 (2)0.0456 (19)0.0032 (16)0.0030 (14)0.0054 (17)
C100.046 (2)0.081 (3)0.050 (2)0.0174 (18)0.0011 (16)0.0000 (18)
C120.092 (3)0.051 (2)0.055 (2)0.0172 (19)0.018 (2)0.0155 (16)
C50.061 (2)0.065 (2)0.0416 (19)0.0074 (17)0.0045 (16)0.0060 (16)
C30.056 (2)0.0516 (19)0.0402 (17)0.0096 (15)0.0080 (14)0.0061 (14)
N20.064 (2)0.067 (2)0.077 (2)0.0158 (16)0.0115 (17)0.0050 (17)
C110.079 (3)0.073 (3)0.055 (2)0.036 (2)0.003 (2)0.0149 (19)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O1i1.888 (2)C4—C31.364 (4)
Cu1—O11.888 (2)C4—C51.391 (5)
Cu1—N1i2.009 (2)C4—H4A0.9300
Cu1—N12.009 (2)C6—C51.371 (4)
N1—C71.298 (3)C6—H6A0.9300
N1—C81.429 (3)C13—C121.381 (4)
O1—C21.313 (4)C13—H13A0.9300
C8—C131.382 (4)C14—N21.137 (4)
C8—C91.403 (4)C10—C111.374 (5)
C1—C21.421 (4)C10—H10A0.9300
C1—C61.413 (4)C12—C111.372 (5)
C1—C71.429 (4)C12—H12A0.9300
C7—H7A0.9300C5—H5A0.9300
C9—C101.398 (4)C3—H3A0.9300
C9—C141.443 (5)C11—H11A0.9300
C2—C31.407 (4)
O1i—Cu1—O1180.00 (12)C3—C4—C5121.9 (3)
O1i—Cu1—N1i90.78 (9)C3—C4—H4A119.1
O1—Cu1—N1i89.22 (9)C5—C4—H4A119.1
O1i—Cu1—N189.22 (9)C5—C6—C1121.7 (3)
O1—Cu1—N190.78 (9)C5—C6—H6A119.2
N1i—Cu1—N1180.00 (13)C1—C6—H6A119.2
C7—N1—C8116.8 (2)C8—C13—C12119.4 (3)
C7—N1—Cu1122.03 (19)C8—C13—H13A120.3
C8—N1—Cu1120.84 (18)C12—C13—H13A120.3
C2—O1—Cu1125.24 (19)N2—C14—C9177.6 (4)
C13—C8—C9119.5 (3)C11—C10—C9119.4 (3)
C13—C8—N1122.1 (3)C11—C10—H10A120.3
C9—C8—N1118.4 (3)C9—C10—H10A120.3
C2—C1—C6119.5 (3)C11—C12—C13121.3 (4)
C2—C1—C7122.5 (3)C11—C12—H12A119.3
C6—C1—C7117.7 (3)C13—C12—H12A119.3
N1—C7—C1125.9 (3)C6—C5—C4118.3 (3)
N1—C7—H7A117.1C6—C5—H5A120.9
C1—C7—H7A117.1C4—C5—H5A120.9
C8—C9—C10120.0 (3)C4—C3—C2121.5 (3)
C8—C9—C14119.1 (3)C4—C3—H3A119.3
C10—C9—C14120.8 (3)C2—C3—H3A119.3
O1—C2—C3119.6 (3)C12—C11—C10120.3 (3)
O1—C2—C1123.2 (3)C12—C11—H11A119.9
C3—C2—C1117.2 (3)C10—C11—H11A119.9
Symmetry code: (i) x+2, y+1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu(C14H9N2O)2]
Mr506.00
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)9.698 (3), 11.403 (3), 10.889 (3)
β (°) 107.570 (11)
V3)1148.0 (6)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.99
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
Tmin, Tmax0.909, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
11307, 2629, 1952
Rint0.057
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.650
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.050, 0.125, 1.09
No. of reflections2629
No. of parameters160
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.26, 0.43

Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

 

Acknowledgements

HJX acknowledges a start-up grant from Southeast University, People's Republic of China

References

First citationGong, X.-X., Xia, R. & Xu, H.-J. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, m494.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationJian, F.-F., Li, L., Sun, P.-P. & Xiao, H.-L. (2004). Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 20, 1295–1298.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationKitaura, R., Onoyama, G., Sakamoto, H., Matsuda, R., Noro, S. & Kitagawa, S. (2004). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 2684–2687.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMarganian, C. A., Vazir, H., Baidya, N., Olmstead, M. M. & Mascharak, P. K. (1995). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 1584–1594.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationRigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationÜnver, H. (2002). J. Mol. Struct. 641, 35–40.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationXia, R., Xu, H.-J. & Gong, X.-X. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o1047.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds