organic compounds
Ethylenediammonium dichloride
aCarl A. Olson Memorial Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: rogerlal@andromeda.rutgers.edu
The title ionic compound, C2H10N22+·2Cl−, crystallizes with a center of symmetry within the cation. Each of the positively charged ammonium ends of the molecule is trigonally hydrogen bonded to three different chloride counter-ions, while each of the chloride ions is trigonally hydrogen bonded to three different ethylenediammonium cations. The hydrogen-bonding network leads to stabilization of the structure.
Related literature
For the applications of ethylenediamine, see: Kotti et al. (2006); Warner (1912).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); cell APEX2; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536809018327/lh2823sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018327/lh2823Isup2.hkl
Compound (I) was prepared by mixing 2.5 ml of ethylenediamine with 62 ml of water. Then 7.5 ml of 12 M HCl were added and this mixture was stirred in an ice bath at 273K until a white precipitate formed. The white precipitate was filtered and washed 3 times with methyl alcohol. The product was dissolved in water and then 12 M HCl was added until precipitation just began; a small quantity of water was then added to redissolve the precipitate. This mixture was allowed to evaporate slowly and large colorless needles of (I) formed, which were used directly for X-ray analyis.
All H atoms for (I) were found in electron density difference maps. The ammonium and methylene Hs' fractional coordinates were allowed to refine, but their isotropic thermal parameters were set at Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(N) and 1.2Ueq(C).
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); cell
APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).C2H10N22+·2Cl− | F(000) = 140 |
Mr = 133.02 | Dx = 1.479 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 1684 reflections |
a = 4.3807 (3) Å | θ = 4.5–67.4° |
b = 6.8569 (4) Å | µ = 8.71 mm−1 |
c = 9.9464 (5) Å | T = 100 K |
β = 91.192 (2)° | Parallelepiped, colourless |
V = 298.71 (3) Å3 | 0.45 × 0.30 × 0.29 mm |
Z = 2 |
Bruker SMART CCD APEXII area-detector diffractometer | 521 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 520 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.022 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 67.8°, θmin = 7.9° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001) | h = −5→4 |
Tmin = 0.085, Tmax = 0.090 | k = −8→8 |
1654 measured reflections | l = −11→11 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
wR(F2) = 0.070 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0415P)2 + 0.1865P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.15 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
521 reflections | Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3 |
44 parameters | Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.066 (5) |
C2H10N22+·2Cl− | V = 298.71 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 133.02 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Cu Kα radiation |
a = 4.3807 (3) Å | µ = 8.71 mm−1 |
b = 6.8569 (4) Å | T = 100 K |
c = 9.9464 (5) Å | 0.45 × 0.30 × 0.29 mm |
β = 91.192 (2)° |
Bruker SMART CCD APEXII area-detector diffractometer | 521 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001) | 520 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.085, Tmax = 0.090 | Rint = 0.022 |
1654 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.070 | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
S = 1.15 | Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3 |
521 reflections | Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3 |
44 parameters |
Experimental. crystal mounted on cryoloop using Paratone-N |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cl1 | 0.91302 (8) | 0.07997 (5) | 0.67014 (3) | 0.0043 (3) | |
C1 | 0.3856 (4) | 0.0762 (2) | 0.97532 (18) | 0.0037 (4) | |
H1A | 0.254 (5) | 0.019 (3) | 0.903 (2) | 0.004* | |
H1B | 0.269 (5) | 0.131 (3) | 1.047 (2) | 0.004* | |
N1 | 0.5508 (3) | 0.2442 (2) | 0.91610 (14) | 0.0044 (4) | |
H1C | 0.660 (5) | 0.305 (3) | 0.983 (2) | 0.007* | |
H1D | 0.444 (5) | 0.328 (4) | 0.885 (2) | 0.007* | |
H1E | 0.654 (5) | 0.206 (3) | 0.845 (2) | 0.007* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cl1 | 0.0057 (3) | 0.0048 (3) | 0.0023 (3) | −0.00036 (11) | −0.00138 (18) | −0.00050 (11) |
C1 | 0.0017 (8) | 0.0051 (9) | 0.0041 (8) | −0.0003 (6) | −0.0013 (7) | 0.0001 (5) |
N1 | 0.0067 (7) | 0.0032 (7) | 0.0031 (7) | 0.0013 (6) | −0.0015 (6) | 0.0009 (5) |
C1—N1 | 1.488 (2) | N1—H1C | 0.91 (2) |
C1—C1i | 1.522 (3) | N1—H1D | 0.80 (3) |
C1—H1A | 0.99 (2) | N1—H1E | 0.89 (2) |
C1—H1B | 0.96 (2) | ||
N1—C1—C1i | 109.68 (18) | C1—N1—H1C | 108.8 (13) |
N1—C1—H1A | 107.3 (12) | C1—N1—H1D | 114.8 (16) |
C1i—C1—H1A | 109.4 (13) | H1C—N1—H1D | 104 (2) |
N1—C1—H1B | 105.1 (13) | C1—N1—H1E | 110.4 (15) |
C1i—C1—H1B | 112.8 (13) | H1C—N1—H1E | 116 (2) |
H1A—C1—H1B | 112.3 (17) | H1D—N1—H1E | 102 (2) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1E···Cl1 | 0.89 (2) | 2.27 (2) | 3.1514 (15) | 175 (2) |
N1—H1D···Cl1ii | 0.80 (3) | 2.39 (3) | 3.1770 (15) | 170 (2) |
N1—H1C···Cl1iii | 0.91 (2) | 2.29 (2) | 3.1922 (15) | 171 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (iii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C2H10N22+·2Cl− |
Mr | 133.02 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 100 |
a, b, c (Å) | 4.3807 (3), 6.8569 (4), 9.9464 (5) |
β (°) | 91.192 (2) |
V (Å3) | 298.71 (3) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Cu Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 8.71 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.45 × 0.30 × 0.29 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART CCD APEXII area-detector diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.085, 0.090 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 1654, 521, 520 |
Rint | 0.022 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.600 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.028, 0.070, 1.15 |
No. of reflections | 521 |
No. of parameters | 44 |
H-atom treatment | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.41, −0.31 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006), SAINT (Bruker, 2005), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1E···Cl1 | 0.89 (2) | 2.27 (2) | 3.1514 (15) | 175 (2) |
N1—H1D···Cl1i | 0.80 (3) | 2.39 (3) | 3.1770 (15) | 170 (2) |
N1—H1C···Cl1ii | 0.91 (2) | 2.29 (2) | 3.1922 (15) | 171 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2. |
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge support by the NSF-CRIF (grant No. 0443538).
References
Bruker (2005). SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bruker (2006). APEX2. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Kotti, S. R. S. S., Timmons, C. & Li, G. (2006). Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 67, 101–114. PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2001). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Warner, A. (1912). Chem. Ber. 45, 121–130. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Ethylenediamine has been used for approximately one century in the preparation of many metal coordination complexes, such as tris(ethylenediamine)cobalt(III) chloride (Warner, 1912). This is an important precursor to many polymers, chelating agents and pharmaceuticals, including drug design (Kotti, et al., 2006). Since it is a widely used building block in the synthesis of many materials, its structure is of interest. However, it exists as a liquid at room temperature, with a melting point of 282K. We report herein the crystal structure of the dichloride salt of ethylenediamine.
Ethylenediammonium dichloride (I) crystallizes with a center of symmetry in the ethylene moiety. Fig. 1 shows the dication with one chloride counterion hydrogen bonded at each terminal nitrogen atom; however, there are three such chloride ions surrounding each N atom. The angles around both N1 and C1 are essentially tetrahedral, with the N1—C1—C1[1 - x,1/2 + y,2.5 - z] angle = 109.68 (18)°, and the angles around N1 range from 102 (2) to 115 (2) °.
Fig. 2 illustrates the packing of (I). Each of the chloride counterions is trigonally H bonded to three different ethylenediammonium cations with N···Cl bond distances of 3.1516 (15), 3.1931 (16) & 3.1749 (16) Å and angles N—H···Cl of 175 (2), 170 (2) & 173 (2) ° (see Table 1). Protonation occurs at both ammonium sites in the molecule (the 2nd is centrosymmetrically related); as a result, each nitrogen is also trigonally H bonded to three symmetry-related chlorides. This H bonding fixes both the chloride anions and the organic dication very rigidly in the lattice. Therefore, through symmetry, there exist six N—H···Cl bonds for each molecule, which leads to a great degree of stabilization in the structure.