organic compounds
4-Acetylpyridine–fumaric acid (2/1)
aDepartment of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, People's Republic of China, and bDepartment of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: xudj@mail.hz.zj.cn
In the 7H7NO·C4H4O4, the complete fumaric acid molecule is generated by a crystallographic inversion centre. The two components of the cocrystal are linked by an O—H⋯N hydrogen bond.
of the title cocrystal, 2CRelated literature
For biological and medicinal applications of 4-acetylpyridine and fumaric acid, see: Fidler et al. (2003); Thomas et al. (2007). For molecular complexes of neutral pyridine derivatives and neutral fumaric acid, see: Bowes et al. (2003); Aakeroy et al. (2002, 2006, 2007); Haynes et al. (2006); Bu et al. (2007). For literature on C—O bond distances in fumaric acid, see: Liu et al. (2003). For metal complexes of 4-acetylpyridine, see: Steffen & Palenik (1977); Pang et al. (1994). For a 4-acetylpyridinium salt, see: Kochel (2005).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection
|
Refinement
|
|
Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); cell PROCESS-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536809020480/ng2588sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809020480/ng2588Isup2.hkl
Reagents and solvent were used as purchased without further purification. 4-Acetylpyridine (2 mmol) and fumaric acid (1 mmol) were dissolved in water–ethanol (6 ml, 1:5) at room temperature. The single crystals were obtained from the solution after 3 d.
The carboxyl H atom was located in a difference Fourier map and refined isotropically. Methyl H atoms were placed in calculated positions with C—H = 0.96 Å and the torsion angle was refined to fit the electron density, Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C). Other H atoms were placed in calculated positions with C—H = 0.93 Å and refined in riding mode with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).
Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); cell
PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with 40% probability displacement (arbitrary spheres for H atoms). Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonding. |
2C7H7NO·C4H4O4 | Z = 1 |
Mr = 358.34 | F(000) = 188 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.351 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -P 1 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 3.9062 (5) Å | Cell parameters from 2308 reflections |
b = 8.6809 (13) Å | θ = 3.2–24.6° |
c = 13.0909 (18) Å | µ = 0.10 mm−1 |
α = 87.925 (4)° | T = 294 K |
β = 89.941 (3)° | Needle, colourless |
γ = 83.141 (4)° | 0.30 × 0.11 × 0.08 mm |
V = 440.44 (11) Å3 |
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID IP diffractometer | 798 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.030 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 25.2°, θmin = 3.1° |
ω scans | h = −4→4 |
3600 measured reflections | k = −10→10 |
1589 independent reflections | l = −15→15 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.143 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0527P)2 + 0.048P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.18 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
1589 reflections | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
124 parameters | Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.032 (8) |
2C7H7NO·C4H4O4 | γ = 83.141 (4)° |
Mr = 358.34 | V = 440.44 (11) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 1 |
a = 3.9062 (5) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 8.6809 (13) Å | µ = 0.10 mm−1 |
c = 13.0909 (18) Å | T = 294 K |
α = 87.925 (4)° | 0.30 × 0.11 × 0.08 mm |
β = 89.941 (3)° |
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID IP diffractometer | 798 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
3600 measured reflections | Rint = 0.030 |
1589 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.143 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.18 | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
1589 reflections | Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 |
124 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
N1 | 0.4491 (6) | 0.4588 (3) | 0.69775 (18) | 0.0630 (7) | |
O1 | 0.8832 (6) | 0.7499 (3) | 0.98158 (16) | 0.0900 (8) | |
O2 | 0.1660 (6) | 0.1037 (2) | 0.67034 (15) | 0.0775 (7) | |
O3 | 0.2584 (6) | 0.2870 (3) | 0.55473 (16) | 0.0764 (7) | |
C1 | 0.5832 (8) | 0.4178 (4) | 0.7899 (2) | 0.0733 (9) | |
H1 | 0.6122 | 0.3130 | 0.8097 | 0.088* | |
C2 | 0.6807 (7) | 0.5230 (3) | 0.8573 (2) | 0.0651 (9) | |
H2 | 0.7765 | 0.4894 | 0.9204 | 0.078* | |
C3 | 0.6342 (6) | 0.6786 (3) | 0.82954 (19) | 0.0494 (7) | |
C4 | 0.4891 (6) | 0.7228 (3) | 0.73526 (19) | 0.0546 (7) | |
H4 | 0.4508 | 0.8270 | 0.7145 | 0.065* | |
C5 | 0.4019 (7) | 0.6088 (4) | 0.6724 (2) | 0.0612 (8) | |
H5 | 0.3048 | 0.6391 | 0.6089 | 0.073* | |
C6 | 0.7453 (7) | 0.7954 (3) | 0.9018 (2) | 0.0562 (8) | |
C7 | 0.6902 (7) | 0.9624 (3) | 0.8712 (2) | 0.0653 (9) | |
H7A | 0.7914 | 1.0212 | 0.9215 | 0.098* | |
H7B | 0.4474 | 0.9961 | 0.8664 | 0.098* | |
H7C | 0.7961 | 0.9784 | 0.8061 | 0.098* | |
C8 | 0.1658 (7) | 0.1535 (3) | 0.5833 (2) | 0.0539 (7) | |
C9 | 0.0643 (7) | 0.0651 (3) | 0.4951 (2) | 0.0561 (8) | |
H9 | 0.0951 | 0.1057 | 0.4295 | 0.067* | |
H3A | 0.335 (9) | 0.337 (5) | 0.615 (3) | 0.131 (14)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
N1 | 0.0771 (16) | 0.0500 (17) | 0.0641 (16) | −0.0142 (12) | −0.0009 (13) | −0.0083 (13) |
O1 | 0.1244 (18) | 0.0731 (17) | 0.0703 (14) | −0.0004 (13) | −0.0407 (14) | −0.0077 (12) |
O2 | 0.1167 (18) | 0.0640 (15) | 0.0548 (13) | −0.0234 (12) | −0.0138 (12) | 0.0004 (11) |
O3 | 0.1198 (18) | 0.0541 (15) | 0.0607 (13) | −0.0313 (13) | −0.0048 (12) | −0.0076 (11) |
C1 | 0.096 (2) | 0.046 (2) | 0.077 (2) | −0.0096 (17) | −0.0064 (19) | 0.0019 (17) |
C2 | 0.082 (2) | 0.052 (2) | 0.0610 (19) | −0.0053 (15) | −0.0123 (16) | 0.0030 (15) |
C3 | 0.0523 (15) | 0.0448 (18) | 0.0513 (16) | −0.0058 (12) | −0.0004 (13) | −0.0030 (13) |
C4 | 0.0682 (17) | 0.0451 (17) | 0.0512 (16) | −0.0100 (13) | −0.0046 (14) | −0.0014 (13) |
C5 | 0.0704 (18) | 0.057 (2) | 0.0566 (18) | −0.0100 (15) | −0.0086 (15) | −0.0024 (15) |
C6 | 0.0577 (16) | 0.057 (2) | 0.0541 (18) | −0.0048 (13) | −0.0047 (14) | −0.0051 (14) |
C7 | 0.0738 (19) | 0.054 (2) | 0.070 (2) | −0.0163 (15) | −0.0083 (16) | −0.0077 (16) |
C8 | 0.0604 (16) | 0.0446 (18) | 0.0567 (18) | −0.0048 (13) | −0.0084 (14) | −0.0063 (14) |
C9 | 0.0680 (17) | 0.0469 (18) | 0.0534 (16) | −0.0063 (13) | −0.0072 (14) | −0.0016 (14) |
N1—C5 | 1.323 (4) | C3—C6 | 1.512 (4) |
N1—C1 | 1.335 (4) | C4—C5 | 1.383 (4) |
O1—C6 | 1.207 (3) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
O2—C8 | 1.204 (3) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
O3—C8 | 1.297 (3) | C6—C7 | 1.481 (4) |
O3—H3A | 0.97 (4) | C7—H7A | 0.9600 |
C1—C2 | 1.378 (4) | C7—H7B | 0.9600 |
C1—H1 | 0.9300 | C7—H7C | 0.9600 |
C2—C3 | 1.377 (4) | C8—C9 | 1.488 (4) |
C2—H2 | 0.9300 | C9—C9i | 1.293 (5) |
C3—C4 | 1.381 (3) | C9—H9 | 0.9300 |
C5—N1—C1 | 117.3 (3) | C4—C5—H5 | 118.2 |
C8—O3—H3A | 108 (2) | O1—C6—C7 | 121.8 (3) |
N1—C1—C2 | 123.2 (3) | O1—C6—C3 | 119.3 (3) |
N1—C1—H1 | 118.4 | C7—C6—C3 | 118.9 (2) |
C2—C1—H1 | 118.4 | C6—C7—H7A | 109.5 |
C3—C2—C1 | 118.9 (3) | C6—C7—H7B | 109.5 |
C3—C2—H2 | 120.5 | H7A—C7—H7B | 109.5 |
C1—C2—H2 | 120.5 | C6—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
C2—C3—C4 | 118.4 (2) | H7A—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
C2—C3—C6 | 119.6 (2) | H7B—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
C4—C3—C6 | 122.0 (3) | O2—C8—O3 | 124.8 (3) |
C3—C4—C5 | 118.6 (3) | O2—C8—C9 | 123.1 (3) |
C3—C4—H4 | 120.7 | O3—C8—C9 | 112.2 (3) |
C5—C4—H4 | 120.7 | C9i—C9—C8 | 123.6 (3) |
N1—C5—C4 | 123.5 (3) | C9i—C9—H9 | 118.2 |
N1—C5—H5 | 118.2 | C8—C9—H9 | 118.2 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O3—H3A···N1 | 0.98 (4) | 1.64 (4) | 2.599 (3) | 166 (4) |
C4—H4···O2ii | 0.93 | 2.57 | 3.471 (3) | 164 |
C7—H7C···O2iii | 0.96 | 2.58 | 3.489 (3) | 158 |
Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) x+1, y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | 2C7H7NO·C4H4O4 |
Mr | 358.34 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 294 |
a, b, c (Å) | 3.9062 (5), 8.6809 (13), 13.0909 (18) |
α, β, γ (°) | 87.925 (4), 89.941 (3), 83.141 (4) |
V (Å3) | 440.44 (11) |
Z | 1 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.10 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.30 × 0.11 × 0.08 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID IP diffractometer |
Absorption correction | – |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3600, 1589, 798 |
Rint | 0.030 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.599 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.040, 0.143, 1.18 |
No. of reflections | 1589 |
No. of parameters | 124 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.19, −0.20 |
Computer programs: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998), CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2002), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O3—H3A···N1 | 0.98 (4) | 1.64 (4) | 2.599 (3) | 166 (4) |
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by the Scientific Foundation of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province, China (grant No. Y200700867).
References
Aakeroy, C. B., Beatty, A. M. & Helfrich, B. A. (2002). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 14425–14432. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Aakeroy, C. B., Hussain, I. & Desper, J. (2006). Cryst. Growth Des. 6, 474–480. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Aakeroy, C. B., Hussain, I., Forbes, S. & Desper, J. (2007). CrystEngComm, 9, 46–54. CAS Google Scholar
Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C. & Guagliardi, A. (1993). J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 343–350. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bowes, K. F., Ferguson, G., Lough, A. J. & Glidewell, C. (2003). Acta Cryst. B59, 100–117. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bu, T.-J., Li, B. & Wu, L.-X. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o3466. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fidler, M. C., Davidsson, L., Zeder, C., Walczyk, T. & Hurrell, R. F. (2003). Br. J. Nutr. 90, 1081–1085. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Haynes, D. A., Jones, W. & Motherwell, W. D. S. (2006). CrystEngComm, 8, 830–840. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kochel, A. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o926–o927. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Xu, D.-J. & Hung, C.-H. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, m297–m299. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Pang, L., Whitehead, M. A., Bermardinelli, G. & Lucken, E. A. C. (1994). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 24, 203–211. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Rigaku (1998). PROCESS-AUTO. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar
Rigaku/MSC (2002). CrystalStructure. Rigaku/MSC, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Steffen, W. L. & Palenik, G. L. (1977). Inorg. Chem. 16, 1119–1128. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Thomas, J. S., Muharrem, A. K. & Ulrich, M. (2007). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15, 333–342. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The fumaric acid and acetylpyridine have been widely used in the biological and medicine fileds (Thomas et al. 2007; Fidler et al. 2003). In the medicine composition the carboxyl group of the fumaric acid is usually deprotonated while the pyridine derivatives are protonated. But some crystal structure determinations showed the neutral pyridine derivatives and fumaric acid in the crystal structures, i.e. the pyridine derivatives are not protonated while the fumaric acid is also not deprotonated in these crystal structures (Bowes et al. 2003; Aakeroy et al., 2002, 2006, 2007; Haynes et al. 2006; Bu et al. 2007). Herein we report the crystal structure of the new compound containing pyridine derivative and fumaric acid components.
The crystal structure of the title compond consists of fumaric acid and 4-acetylpyridine molecules (Fig. 1). The planar fumaric acid molecule is centrosymmetric with the mid-point of the C═C double bond located at an inversion center. The C8—O2 bond distance of 1.204 (3) Å is much shorter than the C8—O3 bond distance of 1.297 (3) Å, it suggests that the carboxyl group is not deprotonated in the crystal structure (Liu et al. 2003).
The acetylpyridine molecule is not protonated in the crystal structure, which contrasts with that found in the crystal structure of the 4-acetylpyridinium chloride (Kochel, 2005). The geometry data of the acetylpyridine is consistent with those found in metal complexes of acetylpyridine (Steffen & Palenik, 1977; Pang et al., 1994). The planar acetylpyridine molecule is twisted to the fumaric acid with a dihedral angle of 25.97 (11)° in the crystal structure.
The intermolecular classic O—H···N hydrogen bonding and weak C—H···O hydrogen bonding help to stabilize the crystal structure (Table 1).