organic compounds
3-[(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)aminocarbonyl]propionic acid monohydrate
aDepartment of Chemistry, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri 574 199, Mangalore, India, and bInstitute of Materials Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Petersenstrasse 23, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: gowdabt@yahoo.com
In the 10H9Cl2NO3·H2O, the conformations of the amide O atom and the carbonyl O atom of the acid segment are anti to the H atoms of adjacent –CH2 groups. In the crystal, the molecules are linked into a three-dimensional network through N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O intermolecular hydrogen bonds.
of the title compound, CRelated literature
For related structures, see: Gowda et al. (2009a,b,c). For hydrogen bonds involving see: Jagannathan et al. (1994); Leiserowitz (1976). For the modeling of water H atoms, see: Nardelli (1999).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996); cell CAD-4-PC; data reduction: REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536809024519/ci2838sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809024519/ci2838Isup2.hkl
The solution of succinic anhydride (0.02 mol) in toluene (25 ml) was treated dropwise with the solution of 3,4-dichloroaniline (0.02 mol) also in toluene (20 ml) with constant stirring. The resulting mixture was stirred for about 1 h and set aside for an additional hour at room temperature for the completion of reaction. The mixture was then treated with dilute hydrochloric acid to remove the unreacted 3,4-dichloroaniline. The resultant solid N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-succinamic acid was filtered under suction and washed thoroughly with water to remove the unreacted succinic anhydride and succinic acid. It was recrystallized to constant melting point from ethanol. The purity of the compound was checked by elemental analysis and characterized by its infrared spectra. Single crystals used in X-ray diffraction studies were grown in an ethanol solution by slow evaporation at room temperature.
The O-bound and N-bound H atoms were located in a difference map. The positional parameters of the N-bound H atom were refined with N-H = 0.86 (4) Å and those of the O-bound (hydroxyl) H atom were refined with O-H distance restrained to 0.82 (4) Å. The positions of water H atoms were refined with restrained geometry (Nardelli, 1999) viz. O-H = 0.85 (4) Å and H···H = 1.365 (4) Å. The other H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry using a riding model [C-H = 0.93–0.97 Å]. The isotropic displacement parameters of all H atoms were set to 1.2 times of the Ueq of the parent atom.
Data collection: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996); cell
CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996); data reduction: REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).C10H9Cl2NO3·H2O | F(000) = 576 |
Mr = 280.10 | Dx = 1.558 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54180 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 25 reflections |
a = 9.5634 (9) Å | θ = 4.8–20.7° |
b = 7.4527 (7) Å | µ = 4.95 mm−1 |
c = 17.292 (2) Å | T = 299 K |
β = 104.35 (2)° | Prism, colourless |
V = 1194.0 (2) Å3 | 0.55 × 0.50 × 0.40 mm |
Z = 4 |
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer | 2052 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.072 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 67.0°, θmin = 4.8° |
ω/2θ scans | h = −11→1 |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | k = −8→0 |
Tmin = 0.098, Tmax = 0.138 | l = −19→20 |
2508 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 120 min |
2129 independent reflections | intensity decay: 1.0% |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.083 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.212 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1684P)2 + 0.6399P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.08 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.003 |
2129 reflections | Δρmax = 0.92 e Å−3 |
167 parameters | Δρmin = −0.69 e Å−3 |
5 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.014 (2) |
C10H9Cl2NO3·H2O | V = 1194.0 (2) Å3 |
Mr = 280.10 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Cu Kα radiation |
a = 9.5634 (9) Å | µ = 4.95 mm−1 |
b = 7.4527 (7) Å | T = 299 K |
c = 17.292 (2) Å | 0.55 × 0.50 × 0.40 mm |
β = 104.35 (2)° |
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer | 2052 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | Rint = 0.072 |
Tmin = 0.098, Tmax = 0.138 | 3 standard reflections every 120 min |
2508 measured reflections | intensity decay: 1.0% |
2129 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.083 | 5 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.212 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.08 | Δρmax = 0.92 e Å−3 |
2129 reflections | Δρmin = −0.69 e Å−3 |
167 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cl1 | −0.35278 (8) | 0.10598 (12) | 0.56662 (5) | 0.0441 (4) | |
Cl2 | −0.33021 (8) | 0.03602 (12) | 0.38996 (4) | 0.0449 (4) | |
O1 | 0.1190 (2) | 0.2952 (3) | 0.33626 (13) | 0.0417 (6) | |
O2 | 0.5845 (3) | 0.4233 (4) | 0.26373 (15) | 0.0534 (7) | |
H2O | 0.674 (4) | 0.448 (6) | 0.262 (3) | 0.064* | |
O3 | 0.6264 (3) | 0.5188 (4) | 0.38871 (15) | 0.0543 (7) | |
N1 | 0.1755 (3) | 0.3197 (3) | 0.47092 (15) | 0.0331 (6) | |
H1N | 0.240 (4) | 0.353 (5) | 0.511 (2) | 0.040* | |
C1 | 0.0452 (3) | 0.2667 (4) | 0.48923 (17) | 0.0301 (7) | |
C2 | 0.0368 (3) | 0.2923 (4) | 0.56697 (18) | 0.0345 (7) | |
H2 | 0.1138 | 0.3446 | 0.6036 | 0.041* | |
C3 | −0.0840 (3) | 0.2416 (4) | 0.59077 (18) | 0.0367 (7) | |
H3 | −0.0879 | 0.2582 | 0.6435 | 0.044* | |
C4 | −0.2005 (3) | 0.1652 (4) | 0.53626 (17) | 0.0319 (7) | |
C5 | −0.1905 (3) | 0.1364 (4) | 0.45895 (17) | 0.0315 (7) | |
C6 | −0.0693 (3) | 0.1877 (4) | 0.43433 (17) | 0.0325 (7) | |
H6 | −0.0646 | 0.1696 | 0.3818 | 0.039* | |
C7 | 0.2060 (3) | 0.3302 (4) | 0.39971 (17) | 0.0311 (7) | |
C8 | 0.3601 (3) | 0.3889 (4) | 0.40446 (18) | 0.0360 (7) | |
H8A | 0.3773 | 0.5034 | 0.4319 | 0.043* | |
H8B | 0.4260 | 0.3022 | 0.4359 | 0.043* | |
C9 | 0.3923 (4) | 0.4068 (7) | 0.3247 (2) | 0.0566 (11) | |
H9A | 0.3294 | 0.4973 | 0.2939 | 0.068* | |
H9B | 0.3717 | 0.2938 | 0.2963 | 0.068* | |
C10 | 0.5465 (3) | 0.4577 (5) | 0.33053 (19) | 0.0400 (8) | |
O4 | 0.1421 (3) | 0.9875 (5) | 0.23932 (16) | 0.0570 (8) | |
H41 | 0.070 (4) | 0.945 (6) | 0.209 (3) | 0.068* | |
H42 | 0.116 (5) | 1.059 (6) | 0.271 (3) | 0.068* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cl1 | 0.0340 (5) | 0.0587 (6) | 0.0425 (6) | −0.0077 (3) | 0.0149 (4) | 0.0020 (3) |
Cl2 | 0.0329 (5) | 0.0645 (7) | 0.0332 (6) | −0.0134 (3) | 0.0003 (4) | −0.0034 (3) |
O1 | 0.0306 (11) | 0.0668 (15) | 0.0259 (11) | −0.0049 (10) | 0.0035 (9) | −0.0020 (9) |
O2 | 0.0391 (13) | 0.0936 (19) | 0.0297 (13) | −0.0109 (13) | 0.0123 (10) | 0.0014 (12) |
O3 | 0.0375 (13) | 0.0839 (19) | 0.0395 (14) | −0.0159 (13) | 0.0058 (11) | −0.0119 (13) |
N1 | 0.0270 (12) | 0.0455 (14) | 0.0256 (13) | −0.0077 (10) | 0.0045 (10) | −0.0018 (10) |
C1 | 0.0263 (13) | 0.0343 (14) | 0.0291 (15) | 0.0006 (10) | 0.0057 (11) | 0.0034 (11) |
C2 | 0.0326 (15) | 0.0411 (15) | 0.0279 (15) | −0.0056 (12) | 0.0039 (12) | −0.0048 (11) |
C3 | 0.0392 (16) | 0.0438 (16) | 0.0281 (15) | −0.0024 (12) | 0.0103 (12) | −0.0045 (12) |
C4 | 0.0273 (14) | 0.0380 (14) | 0.0310 (14) | −0.0010 (11) | 0.0085 (11) | 0.0037 (11) |
C5 | 0.0265 (14) | 0.0372 (14) | 0.0272 (14) | −0.0027 (11) | −0.0001 (11) | 0.0022 (11) |
C6 | 0.0313 (14) | 0.0417 (16) | 0.0237 (14) | −0.0022 (11) | 0.0055 (11) | 0.0017 (11) |
C7 | 0.0255 (14) | 0.0359 (14) | 0.0301 (14) | 0.0002 (11) | 0.0039 (11) | 0.0017 (11) |
C8 | 0.0299 (15) | 0.0489 (17) | 0.0288 (16) | −0.0071 (12) | 0.0063 (12) | 0.0003 (12) |
C9 | 0.0322 (18) | 0.110 (3) | 0.0274 (17) | −0.0167 (18) | 0.0062 (13) | −0.0016 (17) |
C10 | 0.0315 (16) | 0.060 (2) | 0.0281 (15) | −0.0061 (13) | 0.0071 (12) | 0.0040 (13) |
O4 | 0.0364 (13) | 0.094 (2) | 0.0387 (14) | −0.0004 (13) | 0.0064 (11) | −0.0163 (14) |
Cl1—C4 | 1.723 (3) | C3—H3 | 0.93 |
Cl2—C5 | 1.726 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.381 (4) |
O1—C7 | 1.229 (4) | C5—C6 | 1.384 (4) |
O2—C10 | 1.319 (4) | C6—H6 | 0.93 |
O2—H2O | 0.88 (3) | C7—C8 | 1.520 (4) |
O3—C10 | 1.193 (4) | C8—C9 | 1.492 (5) |
N1—C7 | 1.337 (4) | C8—H8A | 0.97 |
N1—C1 | 1.415 (4) | C8—H8B | 0.97 |
N1—H1N | 0.84 (3) | C9—C10 | 1.501 (4) |
C1—C2 | 1.380 (4) | C9—H9A | 0.97 |
C1—C6 | 1.390 (4) | C9—H9B | 0.97 |
C2—C3 | 1.372 (4) | O4—H41 | 0.82 (3) |
C2—H2 | 0.93 | O4—H42 | 0.84 (3) |
C3—C4 | 1.390 (4) | ||
C10—O2—H2O | 118 (3) | C1—C6—H6 | 120.5 |
C7—N1—C1 | 128.9 (2) | O1—C7—N1 | 123.8 (3) |
C7—N1—H1N | 117 (3) | O1—C7—C8 | 122.8 (3) |
C1—N1—H1N | 114 (3) | N1—C7—C8 | 113.4 (3) |
C2—C1—C6 | 119.8 (3) | C9—C8—C7 | 113.3 (3) |
C2—C1—N1 | 116.5 (3) | C9—C8—H8A | 108.9 |
C6—C1—N1 | 123.6 (3) | C7—C8—H8A | 108.9 |
C3—C2—C1 | 120.7 (3) | C9—C8—H8B | 108.9 |
C3—C2—H2 | 119.6 | C7—C8—H8B | 108.9 |
C1—C2—H2 | 119.6 | H8A—C8—H8B | 107.7 |
C2—C3—C4 | 120.2 (3) | C8—C9—C10 | 112.6 (3) |
C2—C3—H3 | 119.9 | C8—C9—H9A | 109.1 |
C4—C3—H3 | 119.9 | C10—C9—H9A | 109.1 |
C5—C4—C3 | 118.9 (3) | C8—C9—H9B | 109.1 |
C5—C4—Cl1 | 121.4 (2) | C10—C9—H9B | 109.1 |
C3—C4—Cl1 | 119.6 (2) | H9A—C9—H9B | 107.8 |
C4—C5—C6 | 121.3 (3) | O3—C10—O2 | 123.7 (3) |
C4—C5—Cl2 | 120.6 (2) | O3—C10—C9 | 124.5 (3) |
C6—C5—Cl2 | 118.1 (2) | O2—C10—C9 | 111.8 (3) |
C5—C6—C1 | 119.0 (3) | H41—O4—H42 | 109 (4) |
C5—C6—H6 | 120.5 | ||
C7—N1—C1—C2 | −171.2 (3) | C4—C5—C6—C1 | 1.2 (4) |
C7—N1—C1—C6 | 10.6 (5) | Cl2—C5—C6—C1 | −179.2 (2) |
C6—C1—C2—C3 | −0.3 (5) | C2—C1—C6—C5 | 0.1 (4) |
N1—C1—C2—C3 | −178.6 (3) | N1—C1—C6—C5 | 178.3 (3) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | −0.8 (5) | C1—N1—C7—O1 | 1.1 (5) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | 2.1 (5) | C1—N1—C7—C8 | −178.6 (3) |
C2—C3—C4—Cl1 | −178.8 (3) | O1—C7—C8—C9 | 2.4 (5) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | −2.3 (4) | N1—C7—C8—C9 | −177.9 (3) |
Cl1—C4—C5—C6 | 178.6 (2) | C7—C8—C9—C10 | −177.7 (3) |
C3—C4—C5—Cl2 | 178.1 (2) | C8—C9—C10—O3 | −16.9 (6) |
Cl1—C4—C5—Cl2 | −1.0 (4) | C8—C9—C10—O2 | 161.8 (3) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O2—H2O···O4i | 0.88 (3) | 1.79 (3) | 2.672 (4) | 177 (5) |
N1—H1N···O3ii | 0.84 (3) | 2.11 (3) | 2.941 (4) | 168 (4) |
O4—H41···O1iii | 0.82 (3) | 2.11 (4) | 2.894 (4) | 162 (5) |
O4—H42···O1iv | 0.84 (3) | 2.09 (3) | 2.881 (4) | 156 (5) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x, y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C10H9Cl2NO3·H2O |
Mr | 280.10 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 299 |
a, b, c (Å) | 9.5634 (9), 7.4527 (7), 17.292 (2) |
β (°) | 104.35 (2) |
V (Å3) | 1194.0 (2) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Cu Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 4.95 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.55 × 0.50 × 0.40 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer |
Absorption correction | ψ scan (North et al., 1968) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.098, 0.138 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2508, 2129, 2052 |
Rint | 0.072 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.597 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.083, 0.212, 1.08 |
No. of reflections | 2129 |
No. of parameters | 167 |
No. of restraints | 5 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.92, −0.69 |
Computer programs: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996), REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2009).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O2—H2O···O4i | 0.88 (3) | 1.79 (3) | 2.672 (4) | 177 (5) |
N1—H1N···O3ii | 0.84 (3) | 2.11 (3) | 2.941 (4) | 168 (4) |
O4—H41···O1iii | 0.82 (3) | 2.11 (4) | 2.894 (4) | 162 (5) |
O4—H42···O1iv | 0.84 (3) | 2.09 (3) | 2.881 (4) | 156 (5) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x, y+1, z. |
Acknowledgements
BTG thanks the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Bonn, Germany, for extensions of his research fellowship.
References
Enraf–Nonius (1996). CAD-4-PC. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Gowda, B. T., Foro, S., Saraswathi, B. S., Terao, H. & Fuess, H. (2009a). Acta Cryst. E65, o399. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gowda, B. T., Foro, S., Saraswathi, B. S., Terao, H. & Fuess, H. (2009b). Acta Cryst. E65, o466. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gowda, B. T., Foro, S., Saraswathi, B. S., Terao, H. & Fuess, H. (2009c). Acta Cryst. E65, o873. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Jagannathan, N. R., Rajan, S. S. & Subramanian, E. (1994). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 24, 75–78. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, L. (1976). Acta Cryst. B32, 775–802. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Nardelli, M. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 563–571. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (1987). REDU4. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
As a part of studying the effect of ring and side chain substitutions on the structures of aromatic amides (Gowda et al., 2009a,b,c), the crystal structure of N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)succinamic acid monohydrate (I), systematic name: 3-[(3,4-dichloro)-aminocarbonyl]propionic acid monohydrate has been determined. The conformation of the N—H bond is anti to both the 3-chloro substituent in the aromatic ring and the C═O bond in the amide segment of the structure. Further, the amide O atom and the carbonyl O atom of the acid segment are anti to each other and are also anti to H atoms attached to the adjacent C atoms (Fig.1). Further, C═O and O—H bonds of the acid group are syn to each other, contrary to the anti position observed in 3-[(3,5-dichloro)-aminocarbonyl]propionic acid (Gowda et al., 2009c). The observed anti position with the latter may be due to the hydrogen bond donated to the amide carbonyl group by the acid segment, which is prevented in the present structure due to the H-bonding effect of hydration. The N—H···O and O—H···O intermolecular hydrogen bonds link the molecules into a three-dimensional network (Table 1 and Fig.2).
The modes of interlinking carboxylic acids by hydrogen bonds is described elsewhere (Leiserowitz, 1976). The packing of molecules involving dimeric hydrogen-bonded association of each carboxyl group with a centrosymmetrically related neighbor has also been observed (Jagannathan et al., 1994).