N′-(3-Methoxy­benzyl­idene)aceto­hydrazide

Lv, L.-P.; Yu, T.-M.; Yu, W.-B.; Li, W.-W.; Hu, X.-C.

doi:10.1107/S1600536809028864

organic compounds

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 65| Part 8| August 2009| Page o1990

doi:10.1107/S1600536809028864

Open

access

N′-(3-Methoxybenzylidene)acetohydrazide

Lu-Ping Lv,^a Tie-Ming Yu,^a Wen-Bo Yu,^a Wei-Wei Li ^a and Xian-Chao Hu ^b ^*

^aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Vocational and Technical College, Hangzhou 310018, People's Republic of China, and ^bResearch Center of Analysis and Measurement, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, People's Republic of China
^*Correspondence e-mail: zgdhxc@126.com

(Received 20 July 2009; accepted 21 July 2009; online 25 July 2009)

In the title molecule, C₁₀H₁₂N₂O₂, the acetohydrazide group is planar within 0.012 (1) Å and forms a dihedral angle of 5.25 (8)° with the benzene ring. The methoxy group is coplanar with the attached benzene ring [C—O—C—C = 0.1 (2)°]. The molecule adopts a trans configuration with respect to the C=N double bond. In the crystal, molecules are linked into centrosymmetric dimers by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and these dimers are linked into a ribbon-like structure along [110] by C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In addition, an intermolecular C—H⋯π interaction is observed.

Related literature

For general background to the analytical applications of Schiff bases, see: Cimerman et al. (1997 ). For their mild bacteriostatic activity and potential use as oral iron-chelating drugs for genetic disorders such as thalassemia, see: Offe et al. (1952 ); Richardson et al. (1988 ). For related structures, see: Li & Jian (2008 ); Tamboura et al. (2009 ).

Experimental

Crystal data

C₁₀H₁₂N₂O₂
M_r = 192.22
Monoclinic, P 2₁ /c
a = 12.394 (4) Å
b = 5.7278 (19) Å
c = 15.017 (5) Å
β = 107.126 (4)°
V = 1018.8 (6) Å³
Z = 4
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 0.09 mm⁻¹
T = 223 K
0.23 × 0.22 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2002 ) T_min = 0.982, T_max = 0.985
4871 measured reflections
1768 independent reflections
1502 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R_int = 0.025

Refinement

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.040
wR(F²) = 0.116
S = 1.07
1768 reflections
130 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max = 0.14 e Å⁻³
Δρ_min = −0.15 e Å⁻³

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O2ⁱ	0.86	2.04	2.8846 (19)	169
C1—H1B⋯O2ⁱⁱ	0.96	2.49	3.350 (2)	148
C3—H3⋯Cg1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.93	2.83	3.544 (2)	134
Symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y-1, -z+1; (ii) x+1, y+1, z; (iii) $[-x, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ . Cg1 is the centroid of the C2-C7 ring.

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809028864/ci2861sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809028864/ci2861Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report

Comment top

Schiff bases have attracted much attention due to the possibility of their analytical applications (Cimerman et al., 1997). They are also important ligands, which have been reported to have mild bacteriostatic activity and are used as potential oral iron-chelating drugs for genetic disorders such as thalassemia (Offe et al., 1952; Richardson et al., 1988). Metal complexes based on Schiff bases have received considerable attention because they can be utilized as model compounds of active centres in various complexes (Tamboura et al., 2009). We report here the crystal structure of the title compound (Fig. 1).

The acetohydrazide group is planar and it forms a dihedral angle of 5.25 (8)° with the benzene ring. The methoxy group is coplanar with the attached benzene ring [C1—O1—C2—C3 = 0.1 (2)°]. The molecule adopts a trans configuration with respect to the C═N bond. Bond lengths and angles are comparable to those observed for N'-[1-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethylidene]acetohydrazide (Li & Jian, 2008).

The molecules are linked by N—H···O hydrogen bonds into a centrosymmetric dimer. These dimers are linked into a ribbon-like structure along the [110] by C—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1 and Fig.2). In addition, an intermolecular C—H···π interaction is observed

Related literature top

For general background to the analytical applications of Schiff bases, see: Cimerman et al. (1997). For their mild bacteriostatic activity and potential use as oral iron-chelating drugs for genetic disorders such as thalassemia, see: Offe et al. (1952); Richardson et al. (1988). For related structures, see: Li & Jian (2008); Tamboura et al. (2009). Cg1 is the centroid of the C2-C7 ring.

Experimental top

3-Methoxybenzaldehyde (1.36 g, 0.01 mol) and acetohydrazide (0.74 g, 0.01 mol) were dissolved in stirred methanol (20 ml) and left for 2.5 h at room temperature. The resulting solid was filtered off and recrystallized from ethanol to give the title compound in 83% yield. Single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanol solution at room temperature (m.p. 485–487 K).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top

	Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% probability level.
	Fig. 2. Part of the crystal packing of the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

N'-(3-Methoxybenzylidene)acetohydrazide top

Crystal data top

C₁₀H₁₂N₂O₂	F(000) = 408
M_r = 192.22	D_x = 1.253 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, P2₁/c	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc	Cell parameters from 1768 reflections
a = 12.394 (4) Å	θ = 1.7–25.0°
b = 5.7278 (19) Å	µ = 0.09 mm⁻¹
c = 15.017 (5) Å	T = 223 K
β = 107.126 (4)°	Block, colourless
V = 1018.8 (6) Å³	0.23 × 0.22 × 0.18 mm
Z = 4

Data collection top

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer	1768 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	1502 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.025
ϕ and ω scans	θ_max = 25.0°, θ_min = 1.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2002)	h = −13→14
T_min = 0.982, T_max = 0.985	k = −6→6
4871 measured reflections	l = −17→17

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.040	H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F²) = 0.116	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0591P)² + 0.1504P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
S = 1.07	(Δ/σ)_max = 0.001
1768 reflections	Δρ_max = 0.14 e Å⁻³
130 parameters	Δρ_min = −0.15 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc^*=kFc[1+0.001xFc²λ³/sin(2θ)]^-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods	Extinction coefficient: 0.013 (3)

Crystal data top

C₁₀H₁₂N₂O₂	V = 1018.8 (6) Å³
M_r = 192.22	Z = 4
Monoclinic, P2₁/c	Mo Kα radiation
a = 12.394 (4) Å	µ = 0.09 mm⁻¹
b = 5.7278 (19) Å	T = 223 K
c = 15.017 (5) Å	0.23 × 0.22 × 0.18 mm
β = 107.126 (4)°

Data collection top

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer	1768 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2002)	1502 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
T_min = 0.982, T_max = 0.985	R_int = 0.025
4871 measured reflections

Refinement top

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.040	0 restraints
wR(F²) = 0.116	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07	Δρ_max = 0.14 e Å⁻³
1768 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.15 e Å⁻³
130 parameters

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > 2sigma(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
C1	1.15806 (15)	0.4646 (4)	0.61337 (12)	0.0650 (5)
H1A	1.1261	0.6149	0.5928	0.097*
H1B	1.2183	0.4331	0.5869	0.097*
H1C	1.1870	0.4637	0.6801	0.097*
C2	0.97784 (11)	0.3121 (3)	0.61264 (9)	0.0406 (4)
C3	0.96000 (13)	0.4924 (3)	0.66739 (10)	0.0450 (4)
H3	1.0137	0.6094	0.6876	0.054*
C4	0.86019 (12)	0.4960 (3)	0.69187 (11)	0.0479 (4)
H4	0.8475	0.6175	0.7286	0.057*
C5	0.77987 (12)	0.3247 (3)	0.66313 (10)	0.0449 (4)
H5	0.7136	0.3308	0.6801	0.054*
C6	0.79857 (11)	0.1412 (2)	0.60826 (9)	0.0376 (4)
C7	0.89771 (11)	0.1359 (3)	0.58332 (9)	0.0403 (4)
H7	0.9108	0.0142	0.5468	0.048*
C8	0.71693 (11)	−0.0482 (3)	0.57784 (10)	0.0407 (4)
H8	0.7291	−0.1619	0.5376	0.049*
C9	0.46526 (12)	−0.2813 (3)	0.59895 (10)	0.0466 (4)
C10	0.43657 (15)	−0.1051 (3)	0.66193 (13)	0.0635 (5)
H10A	0.3628	−0.1375	0.6674	0.095*
H10B	0.4375	0.0484	0.6365	0.095*
H10C	0.4911	−0.1132	0.7224	0.095*
N1	0.62907 (10)	−0.0599 (2)	0.60576 (8)	0.0427 (3)
N2	0.55938 (10)	−0.2483 (2)	0.57366 (8)	0.0465 (4)
H2	0.5765	−0.3466	0.5367	0.056*
O1	1.07271 (9)	0.2889 (2)	0.58390 (7)	0.0574 (4)
O2	0.40548 (9)	−0.4534 (2)	0.57006 (8)	0.0591 (4)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
C1	0.0562 (10)	0.0801 (13)	0.0614 (10)	−0.0309 (9)	0.0216 (8)	−0.0073 (9)
C2	0.0391 (8)	0.0426 (9)	0.0388 (8)	−0.0071 (6)	0.0093 (6)	0.0021 (6)
C3	0.0440 (8)	0.0366 (8)	0.0478 (8)	−0.0091 (7)	0.0031 (6)	−0.0001 (6)
C4	0.0470 (9)	0.0380 (9)	0.0542 (9)	0.0020 (7)	0.0081 (7)	−0.0084 (7)
C5	0.0377 (8)	0.0437 (9)	0.0514 (9)	0.0026 (7)	0.0100 (6)	−0.0012 (7)
C6	0.0360 (7)	0.0351 (8)	0.0378 (7)	−0.0017 (6)	0.0048 (5)	0.0032 (6)
C7	0.0435 (8)	0.0387 (8)	0.0379 (7)	−0.0055 (6)	0.0108 (6)	−0.0030 (6)
C8	0.0386 (8)	0.0383 (8)	0.0422 (8)	−0.0028 (6)	0.0075 (6)	−0.0007 (6)
C9	0.0398 (8)	0.0500 (9)	0.0491 (9)	−0.0076 (7)	0.0117 (6)	0.0014 (7)
C10	0.0608 (10)	0.0665 (12)	0.0693 (11)	−0.0092 (9)	0.0285 (8)	−0.0101 (9)
N1	0.0372 (7)	0.0398 (7)	0.0481 (7)	−0.0070 (5)	0.0076 (5)	0.0003 (5)
N2	0.0399 (7)	0.0439 (8)	0.0555 (8)	−0.0116 (6)	0.0139 (5)	−0.0073 (6)
O1	0.0510 (7)	0.0670 (8)	0.0596 (7)	−0.0240 (6)	0.0249 (5)	−0.0157 (6)
O2	0.0502 (7)	0.0620 (8)	0.0693 (7)	−0.0217 (6)	0.0241 (5)	−0.0108 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

C1—O1	1.4326 (19)	C6—C7	1.3863 (19)
C1—H1A	0.96	C6—C8	1.4623 (19)
C1—H1B	0.96	C7—H7	0.93
C1—H1C	0.96	C8—N1	1.2786 (19)
C2—O1	1.3730 (17)	C8—H8	0.93
C2—C3	1.378 (2)	C9—O2	1.2328 (18)
C2—C7	1.3929 (19)	C9—N2	1.3423 (19)
C3—C4	1.391 (2)	C9—C10	1.496 (2)
C3—H3	0.93	C10—H10A	0.96
C4—C5	1.374 (2)	C10—H10B	0.96
C4—H4	0.93	C10—H10C	0.96
C5—C6	1.396 (2)	N1—N2	1.3774 (17)
C5—H5	0.93	N2—H2	0.86

O1—C1—H1A	109.5	C6—C7—C2	120.32 (13)
O1—C1—H1B	109.5	C6—C7—H7	119.8
H1A—C1—H1B	109.5	C2—C7—H7	119.8
O1—C1—H1C	109.5	N1—C8—C6	120.94 (13)
H1A—C1—H1C	109.5	N1—C8—H8	119.5
H1B—C1—H1C	109.5	C6—C8—H8	119.5
O1—C2—C3	124.24 (13)	O2—C9—N2	119.69 (14)
O1—C2—C7	115.31 (13)	O2—C9—C10	122.14 (14)
C3—C2—C7	120.45 (13)	N2—C9—C10	118.17 (14)
C2—C3—C4	118.71 (13)	C9—C10—H10A	109.5
C2—C3—H3	120.6	C9—C10—H10B	109.5
C4—C3—H3	120.6	H10A—C10—H10B	109.5
C5—C4—C3	121.68 (14)	C9—C10—H10C	109.5
C5—C4—H4	119.2	H10A—C10—H10C	109.5
C3—C4—H4	119.2	H10B—C10—H10C	109.5
C4—C5—C6	119.47 (14)	C8—N1—N2	115.66 (12)
C4—C5—H5	120.3	C9—N2—N1	121.26 (13)
C6—C5—H5	120.3	C9—N2—H2	119.4
C7—C6—C5	119.36 (13)	N1—N2—H2	119.4
C7—C6—C8	119.09 (13)	C2—O1—C1	117.24 (13)
C5—C6—C8	121.54 (13)

O1—C2—C3—C4	−179.97 (13)	C3—C2—C7—C6	0.6 (2)
C7—C2—C3—C4	−0.6 (2)	C7—C6—C8—N1	174.14 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C5	0.2 (2)	C5—C6—C8—N1	−4.7 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6	0.3 (2)	C6—C8—N1—N2	−178.96 (11)
C4—C5—C6—C7	−0.3 (2)	O2—C9—N2—N1	−178.98 (13)
C4—C5—C6—C8	178.48 (13)	C10—C9—N2—N1	1.1 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C2	−0.1 (2)	C8—N1—N2—C9	179.20 (12)
C8—C6—C7—C2	−178.92 (12)	C3—C2—O1—C1	0.1 (2)
O1—C2—C7—C6	179.96 (12)	C7—C2—O1—C1	−179.27 (13)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N2—H2···O2ⁱ	0.86	2.04	2.8846 (19)	169
C1—H1B···O2ⁱⁱ	0.96	2.49	3.350 (2)	148
C3—H3···Cg1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.93	2.83	3.544 (2)	134

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y−1, −z+1; (ii) x+1, y+1, z; (iii) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₁₀H₁₂N₂O₂
M_r	192.22
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, P2₁/c
Temperature (K)	223
a, b, c (Å)	12.394 (4), 5.7278 (19), 15.017 (5)
β (°)	107.126 (4)
V (Å³)	1018.8 (6)
Z	4
Radiation type	Mo Kα
µ (mm⁻¹)	0.09
Crystal size (mm)	0.23 × 0.22 × 0.18

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2002)
T_min, T_max	0.982, 0.985
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	4871, 1768, 1502
R_int	0.025
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.595

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.040, 0.116, 1.07
No. of reflections	1768
No. of parameters	130
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.14, −0.15

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2002), SAINT (Bruker, 2002), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N2—H2···O2ⁱ	0.86	2.04	2.8846 (19)	169
C1—H1B···O2ⁱⁱ	0.96	2.49	3.350 (2)	148
C3—H3···Cg1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.93	2.83	3.544 (2)	134

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y−1, −z+1; (ii) x+1, y+1, z; (iii) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (grant No. 2007 F70077) and Hangzhou Vocational and Technical College for financial support.

References

Bruker (2002). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Cimerman, Z., Galic, N. & Bosner, B. (1997). Anal. Chim. Acta, 343, 145–153. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Li, Y.-F. & Jian, F.-F. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o2409. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Offe, H. A., Siefen, W. & Domagk, G. (1952). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 7, 446–447. Google Scholar
Richardson, D., Baker, E., Ponka, P., Wilairat, P., Vitolo, M. L. & Webb, J. (1988). Thalassemia: Pathophysiology and Management, Part B, p. 81. New York: Alan R. Liss. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tamboura, F. B., Gaye, M., Sall, A. S., Barry, A. H. & Bah, Y. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, m160–m161. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar