Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 65| Part 8| August 2009| Pages o1965-o1966
doi:10.1107/S1600536809028517

A second polymorph of (2E)-1-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-3-(3,4,5-tri­meth­oxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one

Jerry P. Jasinski,a Ray J. Butcher,b* K. Veena,c B. Narayanac and H. S. Yathirajand

aDepartment of Chemistry, Keene State College, 229 Main Street, Keene, NH 03435-2001, USA, bDepartment of Chemistry, Howard University, 525 College Street NW, Washington DC 20059, USA, cDepartment of Studies in Chemistry, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri 574 199, India, and dDepartment of Studies in Chemistry, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore 570 006, India
*Correspondence e-mail: rbutcher99@yahoo.com

(Received 11 June 2009; accepted 19 July 2009; online 25 July 2009)

The crystal structure of the title compound, C18H17FO4, reported here is a polymorph of the structure first reported by Patil et al. [Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Sci. Technol. Sect. A (2007), 461, 123–130]. It is a chalcone analog and consists of substituted phenyl rings bonded at the opposite ends of a propenone group, the biologically active region. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the aromatic rings within the 4-fluoro­phenyl and trimethoxy­phenyl groups is 28.7 (1)° compared to 20.8 (6)° in the published structure. The angles between the mean plane of the prop-2-ene-1-one group and the mean plane of aromatic rings within the 4-fluoro­phenyl and trimethoxy­phenyl groups are 30.3 (4) and 7.4 (7)°, respectively, in contast to 10.7 (3) and 12.36° for the polymorph. While the two 3-meth­oxy groups are in the plane of the trimeth­oxy-substituted ring, the 4-meth­oxy group is in a synclinical [−sc = −78.1 (2)°] or anti­clinical [+ac = 104.0 (4)°] position, compared to a +sc [53.0 (4)°] or −ac [−132.4 (7)°] position. While no classical hydrogen bonds are present, weak inter­molecular C—H⋯π-ring inter­actions are observed which contribute to the stability of the crystal packing. The two polymorphs crystallize in the same space group, P21/c, but have different cell parameters for the a, b and c axes and the β angle. A comparison of the mol­ecular geometries of both polymorphs to a geometry optimized density functional theory (DFT) calculation at the B3-LYP/6–311+G(d,p) level for each structure provides additional support to these observations.

Related literature

For general background to the biological activity of similar compounds, see: Dimmock et al. (1999[Dimmock, J. R., Elias, D. W., Beazely, M. A. & Kandepu, N. M. (1999). Curr. Med. Chem. 6, 1125-1149.]); Lin et al. (2002[Lin, Y. M., Zhou, Y., Flavin, M. T., Zhou, L. M., Nie, W. & Chen, F. C. (2002). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10, 2795-2802.]); Nakamura et al. (2002[Nakamura, C., Kawasaki, N., Miyataka, H., Jayachandran, E., Kim, I., Kirk, K. L., Taguchi, T., Takeuchi, Y., Hori, H. & Satoh, T. (2002). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10, 699-706.]); Nowakowska (2007[Nowakowska, Z. (2007). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 42, 125-137.]); Opletalova & Sedivy (1999[Opletalova, V. & Sedivy, D. (1999). Ceska Slov. Farm. 48, 252-255.]). For related structures, see: Butcher et al. (2006[Butcher, R. J., Yathirajan, H. S., Anilkumar, H. G., Sarojini, B. K. & Narayana, B. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o1633-o1635.], 2007[Butcher, R. J., Jasinski, J. P., Yathirajan, H. S., Narayana, B. & Veena, K. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o3833.]); Chopra et al. (2007[Chopra, D., Mohan, T. P., Vishalakshi, B. & Guru Row, T. N. (2007). Acta Cryst. C63, o704-o710.]); Fun et al. (2008[Fun, H.-K., Jebas, S. R., Patil, P. S., D'Silva, E. D. & Dharmaprakash, S. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o935.]); Jasinski et al. (2009[Jasinski, J. P., Butcher, R. J., Mayekar, A. N., Yathirajan, H. S. & Narayana, B. (2009). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 39, 157-162.]); Patil et al. (2007[Patil, P. S., Shettigar, V., Dharmaprakash, S. M., Naveen, S., Sridhar, M. A. & Prasad, J. S. (2007). Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Sci. Technol. Sect. A, 461, 123-130.]); Qiu et al. (2006[Qiu, X.-Y., Luo, Z.-G., Yang, S.-L. & Liu, W.-S. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o3525-o3526.]); Teh et al. (2007[Teh, J. B.-J., Patil, P. S., Fun, H.-K., Razak, I. A. & Dharmaprakash, S. M. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o54-o56.]). For density functional theory (DFT), see: Becke (1988[Becke, A. D. (1988). Phys. Rev. A38, 3098-100.], 1993[Becke, A. D. (1993). J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648-5652.]); Hehre et al. (1986[Hehre, W. J., Random, L., Schleyer, P. & Pople, J. A. (1986). Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory. New York: Wiley.]); Lee et al. (1988[Lee, C., Yang, W. & Parr, R. G. (1988). Phys. Rev. B, 37, 785-789.]); Schmidt & Polik (2007[Schmidt, J. R. & Polik, W. F. (2007). WebMO Pro. WebMO, LLC: Holland, MI, USA; available from http://www.webmo.net.]). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002[Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380-388.]). For the GAUSSIAN03 program package, see: Frisch et al. (2004[Frisch, M. J., et al. (2004). GAUSSIAN03. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C18H17FO4

  • Mr = 316.32

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 12.4250 (2) Å

  • b = 8.6280 (1) Å

  • c = 14.9038 (2) Å

  • β = 98.3217 (12)°

  • V = 1580.91 (4) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.85 mm−1

  • T = 295 K

  • 0.47 × 0.40 × 0.22 mm
Data collection

  • Oxford Diffraction Gemini R diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007[Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlisPro and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.]) Tmin = 0.557, Tmax = 0.830

  • 8137 measured reflections

  • 3216 independent reflections

  • 2396 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.018
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040

  • wR(F2) = 0.126

  • S = 1.10

  • 3216 reflections

  • 211 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.13 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
C3—H3A⋯Cg2i 0.93 2.91 3.6571 (19) 138
Symmetry code: (i) [x, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, z-{\script{1\over 2}}]. Cg2 is the centroid of the C10–C15 ring.

Data collection: CrysAlis Pro (Oxford Diffraction, 2007[Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlisPro and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007[Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlisPro and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.]); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809028517/sj2632sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809028517/sj2632Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report


Comment top

Chalcones are unique molecules with significant biological activity (Dimmock et al. 1999). Chalcones and their analogs have been shown to have potential antifungal (Opletalova & Sedivy, 1999), anti-tuberculosis (Lin et al. 2002), anti-infective and anti-inflammatory properties (Nowakowska, 2007). The synthesis and biological activity of some fluorinated chalcone derivatives have also been reported (Nakamura et al. 2002). Structures of a series of substituted (2E)-3-(2-fluoro-4-phenoxyphenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ones have also been reported. (Chopra et al. 2007). As a continuation of our work on chalcones (Jasinski et al. 2009) and in view of the importance of fluoro-chalcones, this paper describes a new polymorphic form of (I), C18H17FO4, (2E)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one, first reported by Patil et al. (2007). Substantial changes in the cell parameters provides solid support for the recognition of this new polymorphic form for (I).

The title compound,(I), is a chalcone analog and consists of substituted phenyl rings bonded at the opposite ends of a propenone moiety, the biologically active region (Fig. 1). The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the phenyl rings with the 4-fluorophenyl and trimethoxyphenyl substituents is 28.7 (1)° compared to 20.8 (6)° in the polymorph. The angles between the mean plane of the prop-2-ene-1-one group and those of the 4-fluorophenyl and trimethoxyphenyl rings are 30.3 (4)° and 7.4 (7)°, respectively, compared to 10.7 (3)° and 12.36° as reported by Patil et al (2007). While the two meta -methoxy groups are in the plane of the trimethoxy substituted phenyl ring, the para -methoxy group is in a synclinical (-sc) (torsion angle C(12)-C(13)-C(17)-O(3) = -78.1 (2)°) or anticlinical (+ac) (torsion angle C(14)-C(13)-C(17)-O(3) = 104.0 (4)°) orientation, compared to the (+sc) (torsion angle C(12)-C(13)-C(17)-O(3) = 53.0 (4)°) or -ac (torsion angle C(14)-C(13)-C(17)-O(3) =-132.4 (7)°) orientation as reported by Patil et al. (2007). While no classical hydrogen bonds are present, weak C(3)-H(3A)···Cg2 [C(3)-H(3A)···Cg2 = 138°; C(3)···Cg2 = 3.6571 (19) Å; x,3/2-y, -1/2+z; where Cg2 = C(10)-C(15)] C—H···π-ring intermolecular interactions are observed which contribute to the stability of the crystal packing (Fig. 2). The two polymorphs crystallize in the same space group,P21/c, but have different cell parameters for the a [12.4250 (2)Å vs 7.693 (0)Å], b [8.62800 (10)Å vs 15.232 (1)Å], c [14.9038 (2)Å vs 14.128 (1)Å] axes and β angle [98.3217 (12)° vs 106.60 (0)°].

A geometry optimized density functional theory (DFT) calculation (Schmidt & Polik, 2007) was performed for each of the two polymorphs, with the GAUSSIAN03 program package (Frisch et al. 2004) employing the B3-LYP (Becke three parameter Lee-Yang-Parr) exchange correlation functional, which combines the hybrid exchange functional of Becke (Becke, 1988,1993) with the gradient-correlation functional of Lee, Yang and Parr (Lee et al. 1988) and the 6–311+G(d,p) basis set (Hehre et al. 1986). Starting geometries were taken from X-ray refinement data for (I) and from coordinates from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) (Allen, 2002) for the Patil et al. (2007) structure (SIRDUT). Interestingly, both structures converged to nearly the same geometric state. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the phenyl rings within the 4-fluorophenyl and trimethoxyphenyl groups became 18.0 (9)° compared to 19.3 (6)° (SIRDUT). The angle between the mean plane of the prop-2-ene-1-one group and the mean plane of phenyl rings within the 4-fluorophenyl and trimethoxyphenyl groups became 14.0 (3)° and 5.2 (3)°, respectively, versus 14.4 (9)° and 5.2 (5)° (SIRDUT), significantly different from that observed in the crystalline state for each polymorph. In addition, the para methoxy group became synclinical (-sc) (torsion angle C(12)—C(13)—C(17)—O(3) = -77.8 (2)°) or anticlinical (+ac) (torsion angle C(14)—C(13)—C(17)—O(3) = 106.2 (8)°) in (I), compared to a (+sc) (torsion angle C(12)—C(13)—C(17)—O(3) = 79.2 (4)°°) or -ac (torsion angle C(14)—C(13)—C(17)—O(3) = -104.9 (5)°) in SIRDUT. It is clear that each polymeric form adjusted itself in different ways to achieve the DFT calculated geometric state. Bond distances and bond angles are relatively unchanged between the DFT calculated values and the observed values in (I) and SIRDUT with the exception of the para methoxy group as described earlier.

Related literature top

For general background to the biological activity of similar compounds, see: Dimmock et al. (1999); Lin et al. (2002); Nakamura et al. (2002); Nowakowska (2007); Opletalova & Sedivy (1999). For related structures, see: Butcher et al. (2006, 2007); Chopra et al. (2007); Fun et al. (2008); Jasinski et al. (2009); Patil et al. (2007); Qiu et al. (2006); Teh et al. (2007). For density functional theory (DFT), see: Becke (1988, 1993); et al. (2004); Hehre et al. (1986); Lee et al. (1988); Schmidt & Polik (2007). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002). For the GAUSSIAN03 program package, see: Frisch et al. (2004).Cg2 is the centroid of the C10–C15 ring.

Experimental top

The title compound was synthesized by the reported procedure (Patil et al., 2007). The solid product obtained was filtered and recrystallized from ethanol. X-ray quality crystals were grown from ethyl acetate solution by slow evaporation (m.p.: 362-364 K). Analysis for C18H17FO4: Found (calculated): C: 68.27 (68.35%); H:5.36 (5.42%).

Refinement top

All of the H atoms were placed in their calculated positions and then refined using the riding model with C—H = 0.93–0.96 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.18–1.50 Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of C18H17FO4 showing the atom labeling scheme and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram of the title compound, (I), viewed down the a axis.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The formation of the title compound.
(2E)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one top
Crystal data top
C18H17FO4F(000) = 664
Mr = 316.32Dx = 1.329 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 4493 reflections
a = 12.4250 (2) Åθ = 4.3–77.3°
b = 8.6280 (1) ŵ = 0.85 mm−1
c = 14.9038 (2) ÅT = 295 K
β = 98.3217 (12)°Prism, colorless
V = 1580.91 (4) Å30.47 × 0.40 × 0.22 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini R
diffractometer		3216 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2396 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.018
Detector resolution: 10.5081 pixels mm-1θmax = 77.9°, θmin = 5.9°
ϕ and ω scansh = −14→15
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)		k = −10→9
Tmin = 0.557, Tmax = 0.830l = −18→18
8137 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.126H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0683P)2 + 0.1035P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3216 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
211 parametersΔρmax = 0.13 e Å−3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.18 e Å−3
Crystal data top
C18H17FO4V = 1580.91 (4) Å3
Mr = 316.32Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα radiation
a = 12.4250 (2) ŵ = 0.85 mm−1
b = 8.6280 (1) ÅT = 295 K
c = 14.9038 (2) Å0.47 × 0.40 × 0.22 mm
β = 98.3217 (12)°
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini R
diffractometer		3216 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)		2396 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.557, Tmax = 0.830Rint = 0.018
8137 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0400 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.126H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.13 e Å−3
3216 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.18 e Å−3
211 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O40.54332 (9)0.78663 (17)0.56646 (8)0.0813 (4)
F0.12194 (11)0.38071 (16)−0.04098 (8)0.0982 (4)
O10.01131 (9)0.41222 (15)0.35678 (8)0.0737 (3)
O20.33800 (9)0.64264 (16)0.79007 (7)0.0751 (3)
O30.51516 (9)0.76879 (15)0.74012 (8)0.0716 (3)
C10.10184 (11)0.43862 (16)0.22896 (11)0.0576 (3)
C20.16144 (13)0.54012 (19)0.18363 (12)0.0684 (4)
H2A0.19800.62190.21520.082*
C30.16769 (15)0.5225 (2)0.09261 (12)0.0745 (4)
H3A0.20710.59200.06250.089*
C40.11452 (13)0.4002 (2)0.04776 (12)0.0698 (4)
C50.05441 (14)0.2970 (2)0.08954 (14)0.0765 (5)
H5A0.01890.21490.05740.092*
C60.04768 (13)0.31760 (19)0.17996 (13)0.0695 (4)
H6A0.00610.24930.20900.083*
C70.09279 (11)0.45582 (16)0.32705 (11)0.0591 (3)
C80.18590 (12)0.52523 (19)0.38636 (11)0.0633 (4)
H8A0.24410.56430.36050.076*
C90.18866 (11)0.53327 (18)0.47527 (11)0.0612 (4)
H9A0.12750.49640.49780.073*
C100.27643 (11)0.59319 (17)0.54241 (10)0.0572 (3)
C110.26418 (11)0.58419 (18)0.63367 (10)0.0605 (4)
H11A0.20190.53980.65050.073*
C120.34453 (11)0.64123 (18)0.69953 (10)0.0587 (3)
C130.43756 (12)0.70811 (18)0.67455 (10)0.0591 (3)
C140.44971 (11)0.71778 (19)0.58304 (10)0.0611 (4)
C150.36992 (12)0.66065 (19)0.51690 (10)0.0611 (4)
H15A0.37830.66700.45600.073*
C160.25626 (17)0.5508 (3)0.82150 (13)0.0855 (5)
H16A0.18580.58750.79500.128*
H16B0.26300.55810.88630.128*
H16C0.26470.44480.80440.128*
C170.60831 (14)0.6733 (3)0.75995 (13)0.0836 (5)
H17A0.58740.57460.78170.125*
H17B0.65970.72190.80560.125*
H17C0.64100.65860.70600.125*
C180.56292 (15)0.7943 (3)0.47481 (13)0.0864 (6)
H18A0.56080.69180.44960.130*
H18B0.63320.83920.47270.130*
H18C0.50800.85710.44030.130*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O40.0623 (7)0.1152 (10)0.0677 (7)−0.0271 (7)0.0134 (5)−0.0012 (6)
F0.1049 (8)0.1062 (9)0.0868 (7)−0.0161 (7)0.0246 (6)−0.0256 (6)
O10.0523 (6)0.0813 (8)0.0886 (8)−0.0117 (5)0.0137 (5)0.0053 (6)
O20.0684 (7)0.0970 (8)0.0630 (6)−0.0017 (6)0.0201 (5)0.0015 (6)
O30.0601 (6)0.0861 (8)0.0679 (6)−0.0012 (5)0.0075 (5)−0.0097 (5)
C10.0414 (6)0.0491 (7)0.0814 (9)−0.0007 (6)0.0063 (6)−0.0042 (6)
C20.0646 (9)0.0594 (9)0.0810 (10)−0.0177 (7)0.0099 (7)−0.0098 (7)
C30.0732 (10)0.0666 (10)0.0854 (11)−0.0157 (8)0.0173 (8)−0.0035 (8)
C40.0600 (8)0.0715 (10)0.0785 (10)−0.0014 (7)0.0121 (7)−0.0144 (8)
C50.0625 (9)0.0657 (10)0.1020 (13)−0.0142 (8)0.0148 (8)−0.0260 (9)
C60.0559 (8)0.0569 (8)0.0981 (12)−0.0121 (7)0.0188 (8)−0.0114 (8)
C70.0456 (7)0.0498 (7)0.0817 (9)0.0004 (6)0.0092 (6)0.0014 (6)
C80.0479 (7)0.0645 (9)0.0787 (10)−0.0036 (6)0.0135 (6)−0.0061 (7)
C90.0474 (7)0.0602 (8)0.0763 (9)0.0007 (6)0.0098 (6)0.0070 (7)
C100.0474 (7)0.0563 (8)0.0683 (8)0.0046 (6)0.0094 (6)0.0031 (6)
C110.0493 (7)0.0617 (8)0.0728 (9)0.0039 (6)0.0167 (6)0.0076 (7)
C120.0522 (7)0.0622 (8)0.0633 (8)0.0106 (6)0.0137 (6)0.0038 (6)
C130.0511 (7)0.0624 (8)0.0645 (8)0.0053 (6)0.0103 (6)−0.0023 (6)
C140.0486 (7)0.0690 (9)0.0670 (9)−0.0016 (6)0.0128 (6)0.0014 (7)
C150.0527 (7)0.0716 (9)0.0600 (8)0.0002 (7)0.0113 (6)0.0022 (7)
C160.0891 (12)0.0958 (13)0.0777 (11)−0.0033 (10)0.0325 (9)0.0095 (9)
C170.0593 (9)0.1147 (15)0.0747 (11)0.0075 (10)0.0026 (8)−0.0003 (10)
C180.0681 (10)0.1196 (16)0.0749 (11)−0.0239 (11)0.0224 (8)0.0043 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O4—C141.3602 (18)C8—H8A0.9300
O4—C181.423 (2)C9—C101.463 (2)
F—C41.350 (2)C9—H9A0.9300
O1—C71.2218 (18)C10—C111.393 (2)
O2—C121.3635 (18)C10—C151.400 (2)
O2—C161.420 (2)C11—C121.385 (2)
O3—C131.3734 (19)C11—H11A0.9300
O3—C171.417 (2)C12—C131.390 (2)
C1—C21.384 (2)C13—C141.396 (2)
C1—C61.391 (2)C14—C151.384 (2)
C1—C71.490 (2)C15—H15A0.9300
C2—C31.378 (2)C16—H16A0.9600
C2—H2A0.9300C16—H16B0.9600
C3—C41.367 (2)C16—H16C0.9600
C3—H3A0.9300C17—H17A0.9600
C4—C51.368 (3)C17—H17B0.9600
C5—C61.374 (3)C17—H17C0.9600
C5—H5A0.9300C18—H18A0.9600
C6—H6A0.9300C18—H18B0.9600
C7—C81.477 (2)C18—H18C0.9600
C8—C91.322 (2)
C14—O4—C18117.66 (13)C12—C11—C10120.19 (13)
C12—O2—C16117.99 (14)C12—C11—H11A119.9
C13—O3—C17113.25 (13)C10—C11—H11A119.9
C2—C1—C6118.10 (15)O2—C12—C11124.36 (13)
C2—C1—C7122.51 (13)O2—C12—C13115.61 (13)
C6—C1—C7119.38 (13)C11—C12—C13119.98 (13)
C3—C2—C1121.37 (15)O3—C13—C12119.54 (13)
C3—C2—H2A119.3O3—C13—C14120.55 (13)
C1—C2—H2A119.3C12—C13—C14119.88 (14)
C4—C3—C2118.33 (16)O4—C14—C15124.71 (14)
C4—C3—H3A120.8O4—C14—C13114.82 (13)
C2—C3—H3A120.8C15—C14—C13120.47 (13)
F—C4—C3118.60 (16)C14—C15—C10119.45 (14)
F—C4—C5118.96 (15)C14—C15—H15A120.3
C3—C4—C5122.45 (16)C10—C15—H15A120.3
C4—C5—C6118.50 (15)O2—C16—H16A109.5
C4—C5—H5A120.8O2—C16—H16B109.5
C6—C5—H5A120.8H16A—C16—H16B109.5
C5—C6—C1121.24 (15)O2—C16—H16C109.5
C5—C6—H6A119.4H16A—C16—H16C109.5
C1—C6—H6A119.4H16B—C16—H16C109.5
O1—C7—C8121.74 (15)O3—C17—H17A109.5
O1—C7—C1120.62 (13)O3—C17—H17B109.5
C8—C7—C1117.64 (12)H17A—C17—H17B109.5
C9—C8—C7121.69 (14)O3—C17—H17C109.5
C9—C8—H8A119.2H17A—C17—H17C109.5
C7—C8—H8A119.2H17B—C17—H17C109.5
C8—C9—C10127.76 (14)O4—C18—H18A109.5
C8—C9—H9A116.1O4—C18—H18B109.5
C10—C9—H9A116.1H18A—C18—H18B109.5
C11—C10—C15120.04 (13)O4—C18—H18C109.5
C11—C10—C9118.17 (13)H18A—C18—H18C109.5
C15—C10—C9121.77 (13)H18B—C18—H18C109.5
C6—C1—C2—C3−0.2 (2)C16—O2—C12—C1114.4 (2)
C7—C1—C2—C3−179.40 (14)C16—O2—C12—C13−168.15 (15)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.9 (3)C10—C11—C12—O2177.51 (14)
C2—C3—C4—F−178.84 (16)C10—C11—C12—C130.2 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C51.0 (3)C17—O3—C13—C12104.04 (17)
F—C4—C5—C6179.78 (15)C17—O3—C13—C14−78.13 (19)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.1 (3)O2—C12—C13—O30.4 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C1−1.0 (3)C11—C12—C13—O3177.92 (13)
C2—C1—C6—C51.2 (2)O2—C12—C13—C14−177.47 (13)
C7—C1—C6—C5−179.61 (15)C11—C12—C13—C140.1 (2)
C2—C1—C7—O1149.90 (16)C18—O4—C14—C15−2.9 (3)
C6—C1—C7—O1−29.3 (2)C18—O4—C14—C13177.40 (16)
C2—C1—C7—C8−30.8 (2)O3—C13—C14—O41.6 (2)
C6—C1—C7—C8150.00 (14)C12—C13—C14—O4179.41 (14)
O1—C7—C8—C94.9 (2)O3—C13—C14—C15−178.09 (15)
C1—C7—C8—C9−174.35 (14)C12—C13—C14—C15−0.3 (2)
C7—C8—C9—C10177.60 (14)O4—C14—C15—C10−179.47 (15)
C8—C9—C10—C11−177.15 (15)C13—C14—C15—C100.2 (2)
C8—C9—C10—C154.0 (2)C11—C10—C15—C140.1 (2)
C15—C10—C11—C12−0.3 (2)C9—C10—C15—C14178.96 (14)
C9—C10—C11—C12−179.18 (14)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3A···Cg2i0.932.913.6571 (19)138
Symmetry code: (i) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC18H17FO4
Mr316.32
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)295
a, b, c (Å)12.4250 (2), 8.6280 (1), 14.9038 (2)
β (°) 98.3217 (12)
V (Å3)1580.91 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm−1)0.85
Crystal size (mm)0.47 × 0.40 × 0.22
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Gemini R
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)
Tmin, Tmax0.557, 0.830
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections		8137, 3216, 2396
Rint0.018
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.634
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.040, 0.126, 1.10
No. of reflections3216
No. of parameters211
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.13, −0.18

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3A···Cg2i0.932.913.6571 (19)138.0
Symmetry code: (i) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

KV thanks the UGC-SAP for the award of a Junior Research Fellowship. RJB acknowledges the NSF MRI program (grant No. CHE-0619278) for funds to purchase an X-ray diffractometer.

References

First citationAllen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationBecke, A. D. (1988). Phys. Rev. A38, 3098–100.  CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationBecke, A. D. (1993). J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationButcher, R. J., Jasinski, J. P., Yathirajan, H. S., Narayana, B. & Veena, K. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o3833.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationButcher, R. J., Yathirajan, H. S., Anilkumar, H. G., Sarojini, B. K. & Narayana, B. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o1633–o1635.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationChopra, D., Mohan, T. P., Vishalakshi, B. & Guru Row, T. N. (2007). Acta Cryst. C63, o704–o710.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationDimmock, J. R., Elias, D. W., Beazely, M. A. & Kandepu, N. M. (1999). Curr. Med. Chem. 6, 1125–1149.  Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationFrisch, M. J., et al. (2004). GAUSSIAN03. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationFun, H.-K., Jebas, S. R., Patil, P. S., D'Silva, E. D. & Dharmaprakash, S. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o935.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationHehre, W. J., Random, L., Schleyer, P. & Pople, J. A. (1986). Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory. New York: Wiley.  Google Scholar
 First citationJasinski, J. P., Butcher, R. J., Mayekar, A. N., Yathirajan, H. S. & Narayana, B. (2009). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 39, 157–162.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationLee, C., Yang, W. & Parr, R. G. (1988). Phys. Rev. B, 37, 785–789.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationLin, Y. M., Zhou, Y., Flavin, M. T., Zhou, L. M., Nie, W. & Chen, F. C. (2002). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10, 2795–2802.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationNakamura, C., Kawasaki, N., Miyataka, H., Jayachandran, E., Kim, I., Kirk, K. L., Taguchi, T., Takeuchi, Y., Hori, H. & Satoh, T. (2002). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10, 699–706.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationNowakowska, Z. (2007). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 42, 125–137.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationOpletalova, V. & Sedivy, D. (1999). Ceska Slov. Farm. 48, 252–255.  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationOxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlisPro and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.  Google Scholar
 First citationPatil, P. S., Shettigar, V., Dharmaprakash, S. M., Naveen, S., Sridhar, M. A. & Prasad, J. S. (2007). Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. Sci. Technol. Sect. A, 461, 123–130.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationQiu, X.-Y., Luo, Z.-G., Yang, S.-L. & Liu, W.-S. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o3525–o3526.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSchmidt, J. R. & Polik, W. F. (2007). WebMO Pro. WebMO, LLC: Holland, MI, USA; available from http://www.webmo.net.  Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationTeh, J. B.-J., Patil, P. S., Fun, H.-K., Razak, I. A. & Dharmaprakash, S. M. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o54–o56.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 65| Part 8| August 2009| Pages o1965-o1966
doi:10.1107/S1600536809028517
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS