Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 65| Part 9| September 2009| Pages o2120-o2121
doi:10.1107/S1600536809030815

tert-Butyl N-[1-diazo­acetyl-3-(methyl­sulfan­yl)prop­yl]carbamate

Tahir Mehmood,a Javid H. Zaidia* and Peter G. Jonesb

aDepartment of Chemistry, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan, and bInstitut für Anorganische und Analytische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hagenring 30, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: javid_zaidi@qau.edu.pk

(Received 2 August 2009; accepted 3 August 2009; online 8 August 2009)

In the enanti­omerically pure title compound, C11H19N3O3S, the chain C—N—C(O)—O—C—C (from the asymmetric carbon to a methyl of the tert-butyl group) displays an extended conformation. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked into chains parallel to the c axis by classical N—H⋯Odiazo­carbon­yl hydrogen bonding and an unusual inter­molecular three-centre inter­action involving the amino acid (aa) carbonyl Oaa and the diazo­carbonyl grouping C(O)—CH—N≡N, with H⋯Oaa = 2.51 Å and N⋯Oaa = 2.8141 (14) Å.

Related literature

For the applications of α-diazo­carbonyl compounds in organic and, especially, natural product synthesis, see: Padwa & Weingarten (1996[Padwa, A. & Weingarten, M. (1996). Chem. Rev. 96, 223-269.]). The ready availability, relative stability and facile decomposition of these compounds under various conditions make them useful inter­mediates, see: Doyle et al. (1998[Doyle, M. P., McKervey, M. & Ye, T. (1998). In Modern Catalytic Methods for Organic Synthesis with Diazo compounds from Cyclopropanone to Ylides. New York: Wiley-Interscience.]). α-Diazo­ketones undergo a variety of transformations, see: Ye & McKervey (1994[Ye, T. & McKervey, M. A. (1994). Chem. Rev. 94, 1091-1160.]). Asymmetric versions of diazo­carbonyl reactions have been reported to produce enanti­omerically pure compounds, see: Doyle & McKervey (1997[Doyle, M. P. & McKervey, M. A. (1997). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. pp. 983-989.]). The Arndt-Eistert synthesis, which consists of conversion of activated carboxylic acids to diazo­ketones by the action of diazo­methane followed by Wolf rearrangement, has become widely used in recent years for the synthesis of β-peptides and β-amino acid derivatives from appropriately protected α-amino acids, see: Müller et al. (1998[Müller, A., Vogt, C. & Sewald, N. (1998). Synthesis, pp. 837-841.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C11H19N3O3S

  • Mr = 273.35

  • Trigonal, P 31

  • a = 9.7915 (3) Å

  • c = 13.8581 (5) Å

  • V = 1150.62 (6) Å3

  • Z = 3

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.93 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm
Data collection

  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Nova A diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis Pro; Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis Pro. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.]) Tmin = 0.717, Tmax = 1.000 (expected range = 0.537–0.749)

  • 16152 measured reflections

  • 3073 independent reflections

  • 3051 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.032
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023

  • wR(F2) = 0.060

  • S = 1.05

  • 3073 reflections

  • 171 parameters

  • 1 restraint

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.15 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.14 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881.]), 1474 Freidel pairs

  • Flack parameter: 0.023 (10)

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N1—H01⋯O3i 0.842 (16) 2.027 (16) 2.8465 (14) 164.1 (14)
C8—H8⋯O2i 0.95 2.51 2.9686 (16) 110
C11—H11B⋯O2ii 0.98 2.52 3.457 (2) 160
C3—H3B⋯O3iii 0.98 2.67 3.5693 (17) 152
C1—H1C⋯Siv 0.98 2.95 3.9281 (16) 177
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+y+1, -x+1, z-{\script{1\over 3}}]; (ii) [-x+y, -x, z-{\script{1\over 3}}]; (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) x+1, y+1, z.

Data collection: CrysAlis Pro (Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis Pro. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis Pro; data reduction: CrysAlis Pro; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: XP (Siemens, 1994[Siemens (1994). XP. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030815/at2855sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030815/at2855Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report


Comment top

α-Diazocarbonyl compounds find widespread applications in organic and, especially, natural product synthesis (Padwa & Weingarten, 1996). The ready availability, relative stability and facile decomposition of these compounds under various conditions (e.g. thermal, photochemical; acid-, base- and transition-metal-catalysis) make them useful intermediates (Doyle et al. 1998). Furthermore, α-diazoketones undergo a variety of transformations such as cyclopropanation, aziridine formation, ylide formation, C–H or C–X insertion reactions and cyclization reactions (Ye & McKervey, 1994). These reactions are chemoselective, and promote the formation of new carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bonds under mild conditions. Asymmetric versions of diazocarbonyl reactions have been reported to produce enantiomerically pure compounds (Doyle & McKervey, 1997). One such method is the Arndt-Eistert synthesis, which consists of conversion of activated carboxylic acids to diazoketones by the action of diazomethane, followed by Wolf rearrangement. The method has become widely used in recent years for the synthesis of β-peptides and β-amino acid derivatives from appropriately protected α-amino acids (Müller et al. 1998). Here we present the structure of an α-diazocarbonyl compound based on methionine.

The structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. Molecular dimensions may be regarded as normal. The two essentially planar groupings N1,O1,O2,C2,4,5,6 and N2,N3,O3,C6,7,8 (r.m.s. deviations 0.04, 0.02 Å) subtend an interplanar angle of 84.75 (3)°. The atom chain C2 to C6 displays an extended conformation (minimum absolute torsion angle 170°).

The main feature of the molecular packing is the classical H bond N1—H1···O3, which links the molecules via the 31 screw operator to form chains parallel to the z axis (Fig. 2). Within the chains, an unusual three-centre interaction is also observed, whereby the carbonyl oxygen O2 is involved in short contacts to H8 and N2 of the diazocarbonyl group of a neighbouring molecule. The former is far from linear (angle 110°) but this is not unusual for three-centre interactions. The latter may be interpreted as a dipole-dipole interaction [dimensions: N2···O2 2.8141 (14) Å, C8—N2···O2 73.5 (1)°]. The remaining "weak" C—H···O interactions (Table 1) link neighbouring chains; H3B···O3 is implicit between the chains of Fig. 2 but is omitted for clarity.

Related literature top

For the applications of α-diazocarbonyl compounds in organic and, especially, natural product synthesis, see: Padwa & Weingarten (1996). The ready availability, relative stability and facile decomposition of these compounds under various conditions make them useful intermediates, see: Doyle et al. (1998). α-Diazoketones undergo a variety of transformations, see: Ye & McKervey (1994). Asymmetric versions of diazocarbonyl reactions have been reported to produce enantiomerically pure compounds, see: Doyle & McKervey (1997). The Arndt-Eistert synthesis, which consists of conversion of activated carboxylic acids to diazoketones by the action of diazomethane followed by Wolf rearrangement, has become widely used in recent years for the synthesis of β-peptides and β-amino acid derivatives from appropriately protected α-amino acids, see: Müller et al. (1998).

Experimental top

10 mmol of BOC-protected methionine was dissolved in 50 ml of dry distilled THF under inert conditions. To maintain basic conditions 12 mmol (1.66 ml) of triethylamine was added. Then 10 mmol (0.95 ml) of ethyl chloroformate was added, and the mixture stirred for 15 min at 248 K. 13 mmol of diazomethane were then added at 268 K and the mixture was further stirred for 30 min. After this temperature was allowed to rise to room temperature over 3 h. The reaction was then quenched with 3–4 drops of glacial acetic acid. The solvent was evaporated under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate, extracted with aq. solutions of NaHCO3 and NH4Cl and dried over anhydrous MgSO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (yield 85%; m.p.326-328 K).

Refinement top

The NH hydrogen was refined freely. Methyl H atoms were identified in difference syntheses, idealized and refined as rigid groups with C—H 0.98 Å and H—C—H angles 109.5°, allowed to rotate but not tip. Other H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined using a riding model with C—H 0.98 Å (methylene) or 0.99 Å (methine); hydrogen U values were fixed at 1.5 × U(eq) of the parent atom for methyl H and 1.2 × U(eq) of the parent atom for other C—H. Data are 100% complete to 2θ 145°. The absolute configuration S at C6 (and thus the space group P31 rather than its enantiomer P32) was determined by the Flack (1983) parameter, which refined to 0.023 (10).

Structure description top

α-Diazocarbonyl compounds find widespread applications in organic and, especially, natural product synthesis (Padwa & Weingarten, 1996). The ready availability, relative stability and facile decomposition of these compounds under various conditions (e.g. thermal, photochemical; acid-, base- and transition-metal-catalysis) make them useful intermediates (Doyle et al. 1998). Furthermore, α-diazoketones undergo a variety of transformations such as cyclopropanation, aziridine formation, ylide formation, C–H or C–X insertion reactions and cyclization reactions (Ye & McKervey, 1994). These reactions are chemoselective, and promote the formation of new carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bonds under mild conditions. Asymmetric versions of diazocarbonyl reactions have been reported to produce enantiomerically pure compounds (Doyle & McKervey, 1997). One such method is the Arndt-Eistert synthesis, which consists of conversion of activated carboxylic acids to diazoketones by the action of diazomethane, followed by Wolf rearrangement. The method has become widely used in recent years for the synthesis of β-peptides and β-amino acid derivatives from appropriately protected α-amino acids (Müller et al. 1998). Here we present the structure of an α-diazocarbonyl compound based on methionine.

The structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. Molecular dimensions may be regarded as normal. The two essentially planar groupings N1,O1,O2,C2,4,5,6 and N2,N3,O3,C6,7,8 (r.m.s. deviations 0.04, 0.02 Å) subtend an interplanar angle of 84.75 (3)°. The atom chain C2 to C6 displays an extended conformation (minimum absolute torsion angle 170°).

The main feature of the molecular packing is the classical H bond N1—H1···O3, which links the molecules via the 31 screw operator to form chains parallel to the z axis (Fig. 2). Within the chains, an unusual three-centre interaction is also observed, whereby the carbonyl oxygen O2 is involved in short contacts to H8 and N2 of the diazocarbonyl group of a neighbouring molecule. The former is far from linear (angle 110°) but this is not unusual for three-centre interactions. The latter may be interpreted as a dipole-dipole interaction [dimensions: N2···O2 2.8141 (14) Å, C8—N2···O2 73.5 (1)°]. The remaining "weak" C—H···O interactions (Table 1) link neighbouring chains; H3B···O3 is implicit between the chains of Fig. 2 but is omitted for clarity.

For the applications of α-diazocarbonyl compounds in organic and, especially, natural product synthesis, see: Padwa & Weingarten (1996). The ready availability, relative stability and facile decomposition of these compounds under various conditions make them useful intermediates, see: Doyle et al. (1998). α-Diazoketones undergo a variety of transformations, see: Ye & McKervey (1994). Asymmetric versions of diazocarbonyl reactions have been reported to produce enantiomerically pure compounds, see: Doyle & McKervey (1997). The Arndt-Eistert synthesis, which consists of conversion of activated carboxylic acids to diazoketones by the action of diazomethane followed by Wolf rearrangement, has become widely used in recent years for the synthesis of β-peptides and β-amino acid derivatives from appropriately protected α-amino acids, see: Müller et al. (1998).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XP (Siemens, 1994); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecule of the title compound in the crystal. Ellipsoids correspond to 50% probability levels.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram of the title compound viewed perpendicular to the yz plane. Classical H bonds are represented by thick dashed lines, and the three-centre interaction (see text) by thin dashed lines. H atoms not involved in H bonding are omitted for clarity.
tert-Butyl N-[1-diazoacetyl-3-(methylsulfanyl)propyl]carbamate top
Crystal data top
C11H19N3O3SDx = 1.183 Mg m−3
Mr = 273.35Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
Trigonal, P31Cell parameters from 14422 reflections
Hall symbol: P 31θ = 3.2–75.7°
a = 9.7915 (3) ŵ = 1.93 mm−1
c = 13.8581 (5) ÅT = 100 K
V = 1150.62 (6) Å3Tablet, colourless
Z = 30.20 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm
F(000) = 438
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Nova A
diffractometer		3073 independent reflections
Radiation source: Nova (Cu) X-ray Source3051 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromatorRint = 0.032
Detector resolution: 10.3543 pixels mm-1θmax = 75.6°, θmin = 5.2°
ω scansh = −12→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)		k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.717, Tmax = 1.000l = −17→15
16152 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.060 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0342P)2 + 0.1663P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3073 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.15 e Å−3
171 parametersΔρmin = −0.14 e Å−3
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1474 Freidel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.023 (10)
Crystal data top
C11H19N3O3SZ = 3
Mr = 273.35Cu Kα radiation
Trigonal, P31µ = 1.93 mm−1
a = 9.7915 (3) ÅT = 100 K
c = 13.8581 (5) Å0.20 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm
V = 1150.62 (6) Å3
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Nova A
diffractometer		3073 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)		3051 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.717, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.032
16152 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.060Δρmax = 0.15 e Å−3
S = 1.05Δρmin = −0.14 e Å−3
3073 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1474 Freidel pairs
171 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.023 (10)
1 restraint
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Short contact: 2.8141 (14) N2 - O2_$1; 73.5 (1) C8 - N2 - O2_$1; Operator $1 - x + y+1, -x + 1, z - 1/3

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S0.08692 (4)−0.10432 (4)0.14682 (2)0.03648 (9)
O10.57182 (11)0.62115 (10)0.24352 (6)0.02868 (19)
O20.57776 (11)0.51506 (10)0.38885 (6)0.02855 (19)
O30.66256 (11)0.16891 (11)0.38136 (6)0.02857 (19)
N10.49938 (13)0.36907 (12)0.25188 (8)0.0259 (2)
H010.4999 (17)0.3757 (17)0.1913 (12)0.021 (3)*
N20.88980 (14)0.31145 (15)0.24685 (9)0.0340 (3)
N31.00277 (17)0.3112 (2)0.25596 (10)0.0492 (4)
C10.76526 (17)0.85794 (16)0.33133 (11)0.0350 (3)
H1A0.76320.79910.38900.052*
H1B0.79070.96470.34990.052*
H1C0.84550.86400.28650.052*
C20.60734 (19)0.86229 (16)0.19163 (11)0.0369 (3)
H2A0.68870.86850.14770.055*
H2B0.63070.96900.20850.055*
H2C0.50420.80590.16000.055*
C30.47294 (18)0.75163 (17)0.35029 (12)0.0364 (3)
H3A0.37140.69140.31720.055*
H3B0.48830.85480.36930.055*
H3C0.47390.69400.40790.055*
C40.60502 (15)0.77449 (14)0.28283 (10)0.0278 (3)
C50.55262 (14)0.50412 (13)0.30286 (9)0.0244 (2)
C60.48307 (14)0.22893 (14)0.29774 (9)0.0240 (2)
H60.43290.21730.36240.029*
C70.64131 (14)0.23513 (13)0.31215 (9)0.0234 (2)
C80.75513 (15)0.31186 (15)0.23793 (10)0.0288 (3)
H80.73560.36090.18470.035*
C90.37572 (14)0.08310 (13)0.23693 (9)0.0257 (2)
H9A0.42200.09570.17180.031*
H9B0.3707−0.01100.26700.031*
C100.20871 (15)0.05652 (15)0.22743 (10)0.0300 (3)
H10A0.21440.15440.20320.036*
H10B0.15880.03390.29200.036*
C110.0623 (2)−0.26955 (18)0.21754 (14)0.0502 (4)
H11A0.1660−0.25590.23310.075*
H11B0.0012−0.36710.18060.075*
H11C0.0062−0.27550.27740.075*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S0.03136 (16)0.03576 (17)0.03360 (17)0.01025 (14)−0.00604 (13)−0.00369 (14)
O10.0426 (5)0.0199 (4)0.0260 (4)0.0176 (4)−0.0038 (4)−0.0017 (3)
O20.0390 (5)0.0245 (4)0.0246 (5)0.0177 (4)−0.0050 (3)−0.0027 (3)
O30.0319 (4)0.0295 (4)0.0243 (4)0.0153 (4)0.0004 (3)0.0041 (3)
N10.0384 (6)0.0196 (5)0.0208 (5)0.0154 (4)−0.0023 (4)−0.0016 (4)
N20.0324 (6)0.0379 (6)0.0292 (6)0.0157 (5)0.0058 (4)0.0081 (4)
N30.0392 (7)0.0717 (10)0.0426 (8)0.0320 (7)0.0095 (6)0.0198 (7)
C10.0336 (7)0.0248 (6)0.0424 (8)0.0115 (5)−0.0030 (6)−0.0028 (5)
C20.0521 (8)0.0249 (6)0.0381 (8)0.0224 (6)−0.0028 (6)0.0013 (5)
C30.0400 (8)0.0309 (7)0.0456 (8)0.0230 (6)0.0044 (6)0.0018 (6)
C40.0334 (6)0.0184 (5)0.0335 (7)0.0145 (5)−0.0017 (5)−0.0019 (5)
C50.0271 (6)0.0203 (5)0.0282 (6)0.0137 (5)−0.0001 (4)−0.0001 (4)
C60.0293 (6)0.0198 (5)0.0239 (6)0.0131 (5)0.0010 (4)0.0005 (4)
C70.0275 (6)0.0170 (5)0.0228 (6)0.0091 (4)−0.0009 (4)−0.0021 (4)
C80.0289 (6)0.0277 (6)0.0289 (6)0.0135 (5)0.0024 (5)0.0051 (5)
C90.0273 (6)0.0199 (5)0.0289 (6)0.0110 (5)−0.0003 (5)−0.0015 (4)
C100.0274 (6)0.0261 (6)0.0356 (7)0.0126 (5)−0.0017 (5)−0.0014 (5)
C110.0479 (9)0.0284 (7)0.0653 (11)0.0124 (7)−0.0165 (8)−0.0071 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S—C111.8015 (17)C1—H1A0.9800
S—C101.8089 (13)C1—H1B0.9800
O1—C51.3450 (14)C1—H1C0.9800
O1—C41.4727 (14)C2—H2A0.9800
O2—C51.2107 (16)C2—H2B0.9800
O3—C71.2323 (15)C2—H2C0.9800
N1—C51.3528 (15)C3—H3A0.9800
N1—C61.4468 (15)C3—H3B0.9800
N2—N31.1145 (18)C3—H3C0.9800
N2—C81.3264 (18)C6—H61.0000
C1—C41.5163 (19)C8—H80.9500
C2—C41.5223 (19)C9—H9A0.9900
C3—C41.5189 (19)C9—H9B0.9900
C6—C71.5330 (17)C10—H10A0.9900
C6—C91.5340 (16)C10—H10B0.9900
C7—C81.4237 (17)C11—H11A0.9800
C9—C101.5276 (17)C11—H11B0.9800
N1—H010.842 (16)C11—H11C0.9800
C11—S—C10100.36 (7)H2A—C2—H2B109.5
C5—O1—C4120.53 (10)C4—C2—H2C109.5
C5—N1—C6120.23 (11)H2A—C2—H2C109.5
N3—N2—C8178.84 (15)H2B—C2—H2C109.5
O1—C4—C1110.78 (10)C4—C3—H3A109.5
O1—C4—C3109.87 (10)C4—C3—H3B109.5
C1—C4—C3112.46 (12)H3A—C3—H3B109.5
O1—C4—C2101.65 (10)C4—C3—H3C109.5
C1—C4—C2110.15 (11)H3A—C3—H3C109.5
C3—C4—C2111.43 (11)H3B—C3—H3C109.5
O2—C5—O1126.21 (10)N1—C6—H6108.5
O2—C5—N1124.23 (11)C7—C6—H6108.5
O1—C5—N1109.57 (11)C9—C6—H6108.5
N1—C6—C7112.93 (10)N2—C8—H8121.7
N1—C6—C9109.93 (10)C7—C8—H8121.7
C7—C6—C9108.48 (9)C10—C9—H9A109.1
O3—C7—C8123.12 (12)C6—C9—H9A109.1
O3—C7—C6120.91 (11)C10—C9—H9B109.1
C8—C7—C6115.84 (11)C6—C9—H9B109.1
N2—C8—C7116.62 (12)H9A—C9—H9B107.8
C10—C9—C6112.51 (10)C9—C10—H10A109.1
C9—C10—S112.65 (9)S—C10—H10A109.1
C5—N1—H01117.4 (10)C9—C10—H10B109.1
C6—N1—H01120.3 (10)S—C10—H10B109.1
C4—C1—H1A109.5H10A—C10—H10B107.8
C4—C1—H1B109.5S—C11—H11A109.5
H1A—C1—H1B109.5S—C11—H11B109.5
C4—C1—H1C109.5H11A—C11—H11B109.5
H1A—C1—H1C109.5S—C11—H11C109.5
H1B—C1—H1C109.5H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C4—C2—H2A109.5H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C4—C2—H2B109.5
C5—O1—C4—C166.13 (15)C9—C6—C7—O3−89.46 (13)
C5—O1—C4—C3−58.74 (14)N1—C6—C7—C8−35.64 (15)
C5—O1—C4—C2−176.85 (11)C9—C6—C7—C886.47 (12)
C4—O1—C5—O2−9.28 (19)O3—C7—C8—N2−0.93 (19)
C4—O1—C5—N1170.45 (10)C6—C7—C8—N2−176.76 (11)
C6—N1—C5—O2−5.96 (19)N1—C6—C9—C10−62.16 (13)
C6—N1—C5—O1174.30 (10)C7—C6—C9—C10173.92 (10)
C5—N1—C6—C7−76.13 (14)C6—C9—C10—S174.67 (9)
C5—N1—C6—C9162.57 (10)C11—S—C10—C969.91 (11)
N1—C6—C7—O3148.43 (11)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H01···O3i0.842 (16)2.027 (16)2.8465 (14)164.1 (14)
C8—H8···O2i0.952.512.9686 (16)110
C11—H11B···O2ii0.982.523.457 (2)160
C3—H3B···O3iii0.982.673.5693 (17)152
C1—H1C···Siv0.982.953.9281 (16)177
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y+1, −x+1, z−1/3; (ii) −x+y, −x, z−1/3; (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) x+1, y+1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC11H19N3O3S
Mr273.35
Crystal system, space groupTrigonal, P31
Temperature (K)100
a, c (Å)9.7915 (3), 13.8581 (5)
V (Å3)1150.62 (6)
Z3
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm−1)1.93
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.20 × 0.15
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur Nova A
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
Tmin, Tmax0.717, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections		16152, 3073, 3051
Rint0.032
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.628
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.023, 0.060, 1.05
No. of reflections3073
No. of parameters171
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.15, −0.14
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 1474 Freidel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.023 (10)

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), XP (Siemens, 1994).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H01···O3i0.842 (16)2.027 (16)2.8465 (14)164.1 (14)
C8—H8···O2i0.952.512.9686 (16)110.0
C11—H11B···O2ii0.982.523.457 (2)159.6
C3—H3B···O3iii0.982.673.5693 (17)152.0
C1—H1C···Siv0.982.953.9281 (16)177.2
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y+1, −x+1, z−1/3; (ii) −x+y, −x, z−1/3; (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) x+1, y+1, z.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Department of Chemistry, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan, and the Institute for Inorganic Chemistry, University of Frankfurt, Germany, for providing laboratory and analytical facilities.

References

First citationDoyle, M. P. & McKervey, M. A. (1997). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. pp. 983–989.  Google Scholar
 First citationDoyle, M. P., McKervey, M. & Ye, T. (1998). In Modern Catalytic Methods for Organic Synthesis with Diazo compounds from Cyclopropanone to Ylides. New York: Wiley-Interscience.  Google Scholar
 First citationFlack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationMüller, A., Vogt, C. & Sewald, N. (1998). Synthesis, pp. 837–841.  Google Scholar
 First citationOxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis Pro. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
 First citationPadwa, A. & Weingarten, M. (1996). Chem. Rev. 96, 223–269.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSiemens (1994). XP. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationYe, T. & McKervey, M. A. (1994). Chem. Rev. 94, 1091–1160.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 65| Part 9| September 2009| Pages o2120-o2121
doi:10.1107/S1600536809030815
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS