Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 65| Part 9| September 2009| Pages o2092-o2093
doi:10.1107/S1600536809030487

2-(2-Hy­droxy­ethyl)-3-[(2-hy­droxy­ethyl)imino]isoindolin-1-one

Jiří Urban,a Jiří Ludvík,a Jan Fábry,b* Michal Dušekb and Karla Fejfarováb

aJ. Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Dolejškova 3, 182 23 Praha 8, Czech Republic, and bInstitute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 2, 182 21 Praha 8, Czech Republic
*Correspondence e-mail: fabry@fzu.cz

(Received 14 July 2009; accepted 31 July 2009; online 8 August 2009)

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C12H14N2O3, mol­ecules are packed into layers parallel to (100). Each layer contains centrosymmetric dimers formed by a pair of strong O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds with an R22(10) motif, while strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds forming C(10) chains connect mol­ecules into a two-dimensional network. Additional stabilization is supplied by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and weak π–π stacking inter­actions with centroid–centroid distances in the range 3.4220 (7)–3.9616 (7) Å.

Related literature

For background to the chemical and electrochemical properties of aromatic dicarbonyl compounds, see: Zuman (2004[Zuman, P. (2004). Chem. Rev. 104, 3217-3238.]). For the use of reactions between phthalaldehyde and nucleophiles for the fluorimetric determination of amino acids, see: Roth (1971[Roth, M. (1971). Anal. Chem. 43, 880-882.]); For other structures isolated from systems in which kolamine was reacted with phthalaldehyde, see: Urban (2007a[Urban, J., Fábry, J., Zuman, P., Ludvík, J. & Císařová, I. (2007a). Acta Cryst. E63, o4137-o4138.], 2007b[Urban, J., Fábry, J., Zuman, P., Ludvík, J. & Císařová, I. (2007b). Acta Cryst. E63, o4139-o4140.]). For hydrogen bonding and graph-set motifs, see: Desiraju & Steiner (1999[Desiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology, p. 13. International Union of Crystallography Monographs on Crystallography. New York: Oxford Science Publications and Oxford University Press.]); Etter et al. (1990[Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256-262.]). For the extinction correction, see: Becker & Coppens (1974[Becker, P. J. & Coppens, P. (1974). Acta Cryst. A30, 129-147.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C12H14N2O3

  • Mr = 234.3

  • Orthorhombic, P c c n

  • a = 19.04539 (11) Å

  • b = 7.14668 (5) Å

  • c = 15.71068 (9) Å

  • V = 2138.40 (5) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.88 mm−1

  • T = 120 K

  • 0.64 × 0.11 × 0.05 mm
Data collection

  • Oxford Diffraction Gemini diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2005[Oxford Diffraction (2005). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.]) Tmin = 0.547, Tmax = 0.916

  • 40508 measured reflections

  • 1829 independent reflections

  • 1676 reflections with I > 3σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.032
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029

  • wR(F2) = 0.088

  • S = 3.44

  • 1829 reflections

  • 161 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O3—H1O3⋯N2i 0.85 (2) 1.97 (2) 2.8145 (12) 176 (2)
O2—H1O2⋯O3ii 0.86 (2) 1.94 (2) 2.7903 (12) 173 (2)
C9—H2C9⋯O3i 0.97 2.60 3.4074 (14) 141
C4—H1C4⋯O1iii 0.93 2.37 3.2553 (15) 159
C5—H1C5⋯O2iii 0.93 2.51 3.4239 (15) 167
Symmetry codes: (i) -x, -y+1, -z+1; (ii) [x, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, z-{\script{1\over 2}}]; (iii) [-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, y, z+{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2005[Oxford Diffraction (2005). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2005[Oxford Diffraction (2005). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.]); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1997[Altomare, A., Cascarano, C., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G., Camalli, M. & Spagna, R. (1997). SIR97. University of Bari, Italy.]); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006[Petříček, V., Dušek, M. & Palatinus, L. (2006). JANA2006. Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic.]); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2006.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030487/lh2865sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030487/lh2865Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report


Comment top

In the course of the authors' investigations on the chemical and electrochemical properties of aromatic dicarbonyl compounds (Zuman, 2004) the reactivity of phthalaldehyde with nucleophiles has been studied. The reaction between phthalaldehyde and nucleophiles is important because namely the reaction of phthalaldehyde with amino acids is used for the fluorimetric determination of the latter substances. The fluorescence is substantially enhanced if another, stronger nucleophile is added in excess to phthalaldehyde prior to its reaction with an amino acid (Roth, 1971). Despite of the practical application of this reaction the chemical mechanism of this a rather complex process is still not fully understood. In order to elucidate the reaction steps we started to study the reactions between phthalaldehyde and a stronger nucleophile [2-aminoethanol (kolamine)] before adding an amino acid.

The interaction between phthalaldehyde and a nucleophile seems to be crucial because it is strongly dependent on a medium, on the sequence of the added chemicals (kolamine prior to phthalaldehyde or vice versa) as well as on the way, e.g. its speed, of their mixing as follows from our preliminary studies (Urban et al., 2007a,b). The aim of this study is to investigate the reaction pathway by isolation of some intermediate products before adding an amino acid.

As the first studied nucleophile we have used 2-aminoethanol (kolamine). A previously applied procedure (Urban et al. 2007a,b) involving the addition reaction in non-aqueous acetonitrile when kolamine was added dropwise led to the isolation of two products. In contrast to these previous studies the reaction presented here proceeded in 0.1 M HCl and yielded the title compound that is different from those described by Urban et al. (2007a,b; see Fig. 5). The study that aims to explain this difference in the reactions paths in various evironments is under progress as well as the study of the detailed reaction pathway of the subsequent reaction with an amino acid.

The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. In the crystal structure, the most important intermolecular interactions between the molecules are strong (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999) O—H···N and O—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1). The O3—H3···N2i [symmetry codes as in Table 1] hydrogen bonds are involved in the formation of dimers with the graph set motif R22(10) (Etter et al., 1990; Fig. 2, Fig. 3). These dimers are located on crystallographic inversion centers. Each such a dimer is interconnected to another one displaced by 0, 1/2, 1/2 via O—H···O hydrogen bond with the motif C(10) (Fig. 3). These chains together with the above mentioned dimers are interconnected by other symmetry-equivalent O—H···O hydrogen bonds and form a two- dimensional pattern (Fig. 4) that is parallel to (100). There are also week C—H···O hydrogen bonds and it is interesting that the carbonyl oxygen O1 is involved in a weak C—H···O hydrogen bonding.

There are also π–π stacking interactions between the aromatic rings of the title molecule as indicates their stacking along the b axes in the approximate distance b/2=3.57334 (3) Å. Specifically, the distances between the centroids of the pyrrole rings equal to 3.4220 (7) and 3.8779 (7) Å for the rings displaced by 1/2 - x, 3/2 - y, z and 1/2 - x,1/2 - y, z, respectively. The distances between the centroids of the pyrrole and benzene rings equal to 3.8705 (7) and 3.9616 (7) Å for the benzene rings displaced by 1/2 - x, 3/2 - y, z and 1/2 - x, 1/2 - y, z, respectively.

The attempts at crystallizations of other isolated compounds failed and therefore their molecular structures were assigned by 1H and 13C NMR spectrometry (Fig. 5). The spectra were taken on the NMR spectrometer Varian 300 MHz at frequencies 229.970 and 75.434 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively.

Related literature top

For background to the chemical and electrochemical properties of aromatic dicarbonyl compounds, see: Zuman (2004). For the use of reactions between phthalaldehyde and nucleophiles for the fluorimetric determination of amino acids, see: Roth (1971); For other structures isolated from systems in which kolamine was reacted with phthalaldehyde, see: Urban (2007a, 2007b). For hydrogen bonding and graph-set motifs, see: Desiraju & Steiner (1999); Etter et al. (1990). For the extinction correction, see: Becker & Coppens (1974).

Experimental top

3 ml (50 mmol) of 2-aminoethanol was dissolved in 247.5 ml of 0.1 M HCl. This solution was poured to other solution of of phthalaldehyde (660 mg, 4.9 mmol) in 15 ml of ethanol. The mixture was stirred for 4 h. Then it was filtered and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in CHCl3, the solution was washed with water, dried and evaporated to dryness. The residue (870 mg) was chromatographed on a column of 110 g of silica gel in CHCl3-ethanol (9:1 v/v). The column chromatography afforded 123 mg of the title compound (I) (see Fig. 5) and 192 mg of the compound (II) among other compounds in undefinable mixtures. The title compound was dissolved in about 4 ml of warm CHCl3 and the same volume of toluene was added. After one week light-brown, 2–3 mm long needle crystals were separated. The attempts to obtain single crystals of (II) was not successful despite of all efforts. (From the mixtures of chloroform - ethanol (1:1 v/v) as well as chloroform - toluene- n-hexane (2:1:1 v/v) microcrystallne form has been obtained at best. The structure of (II) was inferred from the NMR spectra 1H and 13C. The isolated compound (II) is not stable, it decomposes, especially in acid medium (pH~4), into the compound (I) and 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[c]pyrrol-1-one (III) - see Scheme 2. The NMR spectrum of (III) is the same as that of 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[c]pyrrol-1-one the crystal structure of which has already been determined (Urban, 1997a).

Refinement top

All the hydrogen atoms could be distinguished in the electron-density difference maps. Furthermore, all the hydrogen atoms could have been refined yielding good geometry. Nevertheless, all the H atoms attached to the carbon atoms have been constrained in the riding motion approximation while the coordination parameters of the hydroxyl H atoms that are involved in the strong hydrogen bonds have been freely refined. The values of the constraints are: Caryl—H=0.93, Cmethylene—H=0.97 Å. UisoH=1.2UeqCaryl/Cmethylene/Ohydroxyl.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2005); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2005); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The title molecule with the atomic numbering scheme. The displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Part of the crystal structure showing a R22(10) motif (Etter et al., 1990) involving the O—H···N hydrogen bonds (dashed lines) forming centrosymmetric dimers.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Part of the crystal structure viewed along the axis b showing the R22(10) and C(10) hydrogen-bond motifs formed by O—H···N and O—H···O hydrogen bonds (dashed lines), respectively. The arrows point to the centre of the ring R22(10) and to the extremal atoms of the chain C(10). Only those atoms that are relevant to the hydrogen bonded graph sets are shown.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. Part of the crystal structure showing the O—H···O hydrogen-bonds which interconnect the structure in the b axis direction. Only those atoms that are relevant to the graph sets formation are showm.
[Figure 5] Fig. 5. The suggested reaction scheme of the title compound. (II): 1-(2-Hydroxyethyl)imino-2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-hydroxy -3-(2'-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2',3'-dihydro-1'H-benzo[c]pyrrol- 1'-one-3-yl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[c]pyrrole (III): 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[c] pyrrol-1-one (Urban et al., 1997a)
2-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-3-[(2-hydroxyethyl)imino]isoindolin-1-one top
Crystal data top
C12H14N2O3Dx = 1.455 Mg m−3
Mr = 234.3Melting point = 373–375 K
Orthorhombic, PccnCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ab 2acCell parameters from 26197 reflections
a = 19.04539 (11) Åθ = 2.8–65.3°
b = 7.14668 (5) ŵ = 0.88 mm−1
c = 15.71068 (9) ÅT = 120 K
V = 2138.40 (5) Å3Needle, brown
Z = 80.64 × 0.11 × 0.05 mm
F(000) = 992
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini
diffractometer		1829 independent reflections
Radiation source: Ultra (Cu) X-ray Source1676 reflections with I > 3σ(I)
Mirror monochromatorRint = 0.032
Detector resolution: 10.3784 pixels mm-1θmax = 65.4°, θmin = 2.8°
ω scansh = −21→22
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2005)		k = −7→8
Tmin = 0.547, Tmax = 0.916l = −18→18
40508 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.088H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 3.44Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s w = 1/[σ2(I) + 0.0004I2]
1829 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
161 parametersΔρmax = 0.21 e Å−3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.19 e Å−3
50 constraintsExtinction correction: B–C type 1 Lorentzian isotropic (Becker & Coppens, 1974)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 3600 (400)
Crystal data top
C12H14N2O3V = 2138.40 (5) Å3
Mr = 234.3Z = 8
Orthorhombic, PccnCu Kα radiation
a = 19.04539 (11) ŵ = 0.88 mm−1
b = 7.14668 (5) ÅT = 120 K
c = 15.71068 (9) Å0.64 × 0.11 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini
diffractometer		1829 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2005)		1676 reflections with I > 3σ(I)
Tmin = 0.547, Tmax = 0.916Rint = 0.032
40508 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0290 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.088H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 3.44Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3
1829 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.19 e Å−3
161 parameters
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O30.01643 (4)0.37865 (12)0.58348 (5)0.0249 (3)
O20.02777 (4)0.42770 (13)0.19272 (5)0.0254 (3)
N20.12251 (5)0.53455 (13)0.46306 (6)0.0189 (3)
N10.17906 (5)0.53362 (14)0.33037 (6)0.0195 (3)
O10.26033 (5)0.52000 (13)0.22084 (5)0.0295 (3)
C80.17913 (6)0.52397 (15)0.41996 (7)0.0167 (4)
C100.08334 (6)0.38375 (17)0.24969 (7)0.0217 (3)
C30.25448 (7)0.50383 (14)0.44476 (7)0.0168 (3)
C20.29391 (7)0.50185 (15)0.36982 (7)0.0182 (4)
C60.40008 (7)0.47776 (16)0.44756 (8)0.0228 (4)
C90.11818 (6)0.56558 (17)0.27593 (7)0.0209 (4)
C40.28841 (6)0.49167 (15)0.52267 (8)0.0202 (4)
C120.05695 (6)0.54373 (18)0.59873 (7)0.0229 (4)
C110.12770 (6)0.52705 (16)0.55650 (7)0.0198 (4)
C70.36643 (6)0.49080 (15)0.36957 (8)0.0208 (4)
C50.36134 (7)0.47820 (16)0.52273 (8)0.0228 (4)
C10.24599 (6)0.51820 (16)0.29654 (7)0.0202 (4)
H1c100.1173230.304690.221040.026*
H2c100.0644040.3219050.2996330.026*
H1c90.1325490.6339580.2255210.0251*
H2c90.0844680.6434880.3056940.0251*
H1c120.0632130.5605060.6595240.0275*
H2c120.0323340.6515880.5760510.0275*
H1c110.1580480.6269550.5763230.0238*
H2c110.1496750.4103910.5734080.0238*
H1c60.4487640.4686860.449470.0273*
H1c40.2630620.4925170.5732560.0243*
H1c70.3916120.4920810.3188540.025*
H1c50.3848490.4692560.574460.0273*
H1o3−0.0255 (9)0.409 (2)0.5715 (10)0.0373*
H1o20.0205 (8)0.335 (2)0.1590 (10)0.0381*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O30.0162 (5)0.0353 (5)0.0231 (4)0.0000 (4)−0.0010 (3)0.0066 (3)
O20.0200 (4)0.0346 (5)0.0217 (4)0.0008 (4)−0.0064 (3)−0.0041 (4)
N20.0179 (5)0.0237 (5)0.0150 (5)0.0000 (4)0.0003 (4)0.0005 (4)
N10.0172 (5)0.0284 (6)0.0128 (5)0.0002 (4)−0.0020 (4)0.0000 (4)
O10.0266 (5)0.0491 (6)0.0130 (4)0.0007 (4)0.0017 (3)−0.0006 (3)
C80.0195 (6)0.0183 (6)0.0123 (6)−0.0009 (4)−0.0015 (5)0.0000 (4)
C100.0191 (6)0.0295 (7)0.0163 (6)0.0012 (5)−0.0023 (4)0.0000 (4)
C30.0184 (6)0.0168 (6)0.0152 (6)−0.0005 (4)0.0009 (5)−0.0003 (4)
C20.0201 (7)0.0186 (6)0.0159 (6)0.0005 (4)0.0000 (4)−0.0010 (4)
C60.0179 (7)0.0268 (7)0.0235 (7)0.0024 (5)−0.0006 (5)−0.0006 (5)
C90.0195 (6)0.0293 (7)0.0140 (6)0.0014 (5)−0.0030 (4)0.0022 (5)
C40.0205 (7)0.0242 (6)0.0161 (6)0.0005 (4)0.0001 (5)0.0005 (4)
C120.0221 (6)0.0302 (7)0.0163 (6)0.0018 (5)0.0012 (5)0.0003 (4)
C110.0194 (6)0.0264 (7)0.0137 (6)−0.0005 (4)0.0001 (4)0.0016 (4)
C70.0202 (7)0.0228 (6)0.0194 (7)0.0013 (4)0.0034 (5)−0.0015 (4)
C50.0227 (7)0.0271 (7)0.0185 (6)0.0009 (5)−0.0036 (5)0.0011 (4)
C10.0220 (6)0.0243 (6)0.0143 (6)−0.0007 (5)0.0003 (5)−0.0010 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O3—C121.4300 (15)C4—C51.3923 (18)
O2—C101.4213 (13)C12—C111.5067 (16)
N2—C81.2756 (15)O3—H1o30.848 (17)
N2—C111.4724 (15)O2—H1o20.859 (16)
N1—C81.4092 (15)C10—H1c100.9700
N1—C91.4587 (14)C10—H2c100.9700
N1—C11.3856 (15)C6—H1c60.9300
O1—C11.2204 (14)C9—H1c90.9700
C8—C31.4940 (17)C9—H2c90.9700
C10—C91.5163 (17)C4—H1c40.9300
C3—C21.3966 (16)C12—H1c120.9700
C3—C41.3867 (17)C12—H2c120.9700
C2—C71.3833 (17)C11—H1c110.9700
C2—C11.4737 (16)C11—H2c110.9700
C6—C71.3860 (17)C7—H1c70.9300
C6—C51.3925 (17)C5—H1c50.9300
C8—N2—C11118.06 (10)O2—C10—H2c10109.47
C8—N1—C9126.45 (9)C9—C10—H1c10109.47
C8—N1—C1112.22 (9)C9—C10—H2c10109.47
C9—N1—C1121.26 (9)H1c10—C10—H2c10110.98
N2—C8—N1121.76 (10)N1—C9—H1c9109.47
N2—C8—C3132.79 (10)N1—C9—H2c9109.47
N1—C8—C3105.44 (9)C10—C9—H1c9109.47
O2—C10—C9107.92 (9)C10—C9—H2c9109.47
C8—C3—C2107.31 (10)H1c9—C9—H2c9106.93
C8—C3—C4133.15 (11)O3—C12—H1c12109.47
C2—C3—C4119.53 (11)O3—C12—H2c12109.47
C3—C2—C7122.67 (11)C11—C12—H1c12109.47
C3—C2—C1108.95 (10)C11—C12—H2c12109.47
C7—C2—C1128.36 (11)H1c12—C12—H2c12108.84
C7—C6—C5120.31 (12)N2—C11—H1c11109.47
N1—C9—C10111.90 (10)N2—C11—H2c11109.47
C3—C4—C5118.03 (11)C12—C11—H1c11109.47
O3—C12—C11110.10 (9)C12—C11—H2c11109.47
N2—C11—C12112.09 (9)H1c11—C11—H2c11106.72
C2—C7—C6117.58 (11)C3—C4—H1c4120.79
C6—C5—C4121.87 (11)C5—C4—H1c4121.18
N1—C1—O1125.37 (11)C6—C5—H1c5119.07
N1—C1—C2106.05 (9)C4—C5—H1c5119.06
O1—C1—C2128.58 (11)C7—C6—H1c6119.61
C12—O3—H1o3109.5 (10)C5—C6—H1c6120.07
C10—O2—H1o2109.8 (10)C2—C7—H1c7121.12
O2—C10—H1c10109.47C6—C7—H1c7121.30
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H1O3···N2i0.85 (2)1.97 (2)2.8145 (12)176 (2)
O2—H1O2···O3ii0.86 (2)1.94 (2)2.7903 (12)173 (2)
C9—H2C9···O3i0.972.603.4074 (14)141
C4—H1C4···O1iii0.932.373.2553 (15)159
C5—H1C5···O2iii0.932.513.4239 (15)167
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+1/2, y, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H14N2O3
Mr234.3
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pccn
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)19.04539 (11), 7.14668 (5), 15.71068 (9)
V (Å3)2138.40 (5)
Z8
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm−1)0.88
Crystal size (mm)0.64 × 0.11 × 0.05
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Gemini
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2005)
Tmin, Tmax0.547, 0.916
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 3σ(I)] reflections		40508, 1829, 1676
Rint0.032
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.590
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.088, 3.44
No. of reflections1829
No. of parameters161
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.21, −0.19

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2005), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2005), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1997), JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006), PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H1O3···N2i0.849 (17)1.968 (17)2.8145 (12)175.8 (16)
O2—H1O2···O3ii0.860 (15)1.935 (15)2.7903 (12)173.0 (15)
C9—H2C9···O3i0.972.603.4074 (14)141
C4—H1C4···O1iii0.932.373.2553 (15)159
C5—H1C5···O2iii0.932.513.4239 (15)167
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+1/2, y, z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic for support of this study (grant No. ME 09002). The institutional research plan No. AVOZ10100521 of the Institute of Physics is also acknowledged.

References

First citationAltomare, A., Cascarano, C., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G., Camalli, M. & Spagna, R. (1997). SIR97. University of Bari, Italy.  Google Scholar
 First citationBecker, P. J. & Coppens, P. (1974). Acta Cryst. A30, 129–147.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationDesiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology, p. 13. International Union of Crystallography Monographs on Crystallography. New York: Oxford Science Publications and Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
 First citationEtter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationOxford Diffraction (2005). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.  Google Scholar
 First citationPetříček, V., Dušek, M. & Palatinus, L. (2006). JANA2006. Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic.  Google Scholar
 First citationRoth, M. (1971). Anal. Chem. 43, 880–882.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationUrban, J., Fábry, J., Zuman, P., Ludvík, J. & Císařová, I. (2007a). Acta Cryst. E63, o4137–o4138.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationUrban, J., Fábry, J., Zuman, P., Ludvík, J. & Císařová, I. (2007b). Acta Cryst. E63, o4139–o4140.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationZuman, P. (2004). Chem. Rev. 104, 3217–3238.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 65| Part 9| September 2009| Pages o2092-o2093
doi:10.1107/S1600536809030487
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS