organic compounds
5-Chloropyrimidin-2-amine
aCollege of Food Science and Light Industry, Nanjing University of Technology, Xinmofan Road No. 5 Nanjing, Nanjing 210009, People's Republic of China, and bCollege of Science, Nanjing University of Technology, Xinmofan Road No. 5 Nanjing, Nanjing 210009, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: wanghaibo@njut.edu.cn
The complete molecule of the title compound, C4H3ClN3, is generated by crystallographic mirror symmetry, with the Cl atom, one N atom and two C atoms lying on the reflecting plane. In the intermolecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the molecules into chains propagating in [100].
Related literature
For general background, see: Hannouta & Johnson (1982). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009).
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536809043645/hb5158sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536809043645/hb5158Isup2.hkl
Guanidine (20 g) and 2-chloromalonaldehyde (16 g) were added to concentrated H2SO4 (50g) with cooling; the mixture was allowed to stand for two hours at room temperature, the product poured into ice water, neutralized with NH4OH, the precipitated filtered, made strongly alkaline with NH4OH, and the precipitate was recrystallized from alcohol or sublimed to give the title compound. Colourless blocks of (I) were obtained by slow evaporation of an methanol solution.
H atoms were positioned geometrically (N—H = 0.86 Å, C—H = 0.93–0.98Å) and refined as riding with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C,N) or 1.5Ueq(methyl C).
For general background, see: Hannouta & Johnson (1982). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987).
Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell
CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009).C4H4ClN3 | Dx = 1.602 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 129.55 | Melting point: 506 K |
Orthorhombic, Cmca | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2bc 2 | Cell parameters from 25 reflections |
a = 7.6380 (15) Å | θ = 10–13° |
b = 8.2240 (16) Å | µ = 0.59 mm−1 |
c = 17.100 (3) Å | T = 293 K |
V = 1074.1 (4) Å3 | Block, colourless |
Z = 8 | 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm |
F(000) = 528 |
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer | 462 reflections with I > 2˘I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.020 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 25.3°, θmin = 2.4° |
ω/2θ scans | h = 0→9 |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | k = 0→9 |
Tmin = 0.844, Tmax = 0.944 | l = −20→20 |
1047 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections |
534 independent reflections | intensity decay: 1% |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.116 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1P)2 + 0.2P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 0.92 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
534 reflections | Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 |
44 parameters | Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.025 (4) |
C4H4ClN3 | V = 1074.1 (4) Å3 |
Mr = 129.55 | Z = 8 |
Orthorhombic, Cmca | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 7.6380 (15) Å | µ = 0.59 mm−1 |
b = 8.2240 (16) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 17.100 (3) Å | 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm |
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer | 462 reflections with I > 2˘I) |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | Rint = 0.020 |
Tmin = 0.844, Tmax = 0.944 | 3 standard reflections every 200 reflections |
1047 measured reflections | intensity decay: 1% |
534 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.116 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.92 | Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 |
534 reflections | Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3 |
44 parameters |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cl | 0.5000 | 0.22728 (9) | 0.27440 (4) | 0.0527 (4) | |
N1 | 0.65713 (16) | −0.11849 (18) | 0.41923 (8) | 0.0360 (5) | |
C3 | 0.5000 | −0.1761 (3) | 0.44284 (14) | 0.0319 (6) | |
N2 | 0.5000 | −0.3014 (3) | 0.49308 (15) | 0.0432 (7) | |
H2A | 0.6021 | −0.3434 | 0.5099 | 0.052* | |
C2 | 0.6542 (2) | 0.0027 (2) | 0.36821 (10) | 0.0364 (5) | |
H2C | 0.7598 | 0.0457 | 0.3507 | 0.044* | |
C1 | 0.5000 | 0.0674 (3) | 0.34019 (13) | 0.0347 (6) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cl | 0.0488 (6) | 0.0514 (6) | 0.0580 (6) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.0225 (3) |
N1 | 0.0258 (9) | 0.0398 (9) | 0.0424 (9) | −0.0007 (6) | 0.0004 (5) | 0.0045 (6) |
C3 | 0.0278 (12) | 0.0325 (13) | 0.0354 (12) | 0.000 | 0.000 | −0.0039 (11) |
N2 | 0.0288 (11) | 0.0450 (13) | 0.0559 (14) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.0179 (11) |
C2 | 0.0296 (10) | 0.0379 (10) | 0.0418 (9) | −0.0033 (7) | 0.0032 (7) | 0.0013 (7) |
C1 | 0.0353 (13) | 0.0328 (13) | 0.0359 (13) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.0026 (10) |
Cl—C1 | 1.730 (2) | N2—H2A | 0.9000 |
N1—C2 | 1.325 (2) | C2—C1 | 1.378 (2) |
N1—C3 | 1.3519 (18) | C2—H2C | 0.9300 |
C3—N2 | 1.341 (4) | C1—C2i | 1.378 (2) |
C3—N1i | 1.3519 (18) | ||
C2—N1—C3 | 116.44 (14) | N1—C2—H2C | 118.9 |
N2—C3—N1i | 117.41 (11) | C1—C2—H2C | 118.9 |
N2—C3—N1 | 117.41 (11) | C2—C1—C2i | 117.4 (2) |
N1i—C3—N1 | 125.2 (2) | C2—C1—Cl | 121.28 (11) |
C3—N2—H2A | 120.0 | C2i—C1—Cl | 121.28 (11) |
N1—C2—C1 | 122.25 (15) | ||
C2—N1—C3—N2 | 178.5 (2) | N1—C2—C1—C2i | 1.0 (4) |
C2—N1—C3—N1i | −0.8 (4) | N1—C2—C1—Cl | 179.28 (14) |
C3—N1—C2—C1 | −0.1 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H2A···N1ii | 0.90 | 2.22 | 3.087 (2) | 161 |
Symmetry code: (ii) −x+3/2, −y−1/2, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C4H4ClN3 |
Mr | 129.55 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Cmca |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 7.6380 (15), 8.2240 (16), 17.100 (3) |
V (Å3) | 1074.1 (4) |
Z | 8 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.59 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 |
Absorption correction | ψ scan (North et al., 1968) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.844, 0.944 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2˘I)] reflections | 1047, 534, 462 |
Rint | 0.020 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.600 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.033, 0.116, 0.92 |
No. of reflections | 534 |
No. of parameters | 44 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.20, −0.22 |
Computer programs: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994), XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2009).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H2A···N1i | 0.90 | 2.22 | 3.087 (2) | 161 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+3/2, −y−1/2, −z+1. |
References
Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19. CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Enraf–Nonius (1994). CAD-4 EXPRESS. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Hannouta, I. B. & Johnson, A. (1982). Dyes Pigments, 3, 173–182. Google Scholar
Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4. University of Marburg, Germany. Google Scholar
North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.