organic compounds
5-Amino-1-naphthol
aFaculty of Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University, 60-780 Poznań, Poland
*Correspondence e-mail: magdan@amu.edu.pl
In the title compound, C10H9NO, the amino and the hydroxy groups act both as a single donor and a single acceptor in hydrogen bonding. In the crystal, molecules are connected via chains of intermolecular ⋯N—H⋯O—H⋯ interactions, forming a two-dimensional polymeric structure resembling the hydrogen-bonded molecular assembly found in the of naphthalene-1,5-diol. Within this layer, molecules related by a translation along the a axis are arranged into slipped stacks via π–π stacking interactions [interplanar distance = 3.450 (4) Å]. The amino N atom shows sp3 and the two attached H atoms are located on the same side of the aromatic ring.
Related literature
For the et al. (1990). For amino-hydroxy group recognition and packing motifs of aminols, see: Ermer & Eling (1994); Hanessian et al. (1994); Allen et al. (1997); Dey et al. (2005).
of 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene, see: BelskiiExperimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); cell CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536809045152/su2154sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536809045152/su2154Isup2.hkl
Single crystals of the commercially available 5-amino-1-naphthol (Aldrich) were obtained from chloroform solution by slow evaporation.
In the absence of significant
effects, Friedel pairs were averaged. All H-atoms were located in electron-density difference maps. The H-atoms of the OH and NH groups were freely refined: O-H = 0.94 (3) Å, N-H = 0.95 (3)- 0.96 (3) Å. The C-bound H-atoms were placed at calculated positions, with C—H = 0.93 Å, and refined as riding on their carrier C-atom, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). .Amino-hydroxy group recognition has been at the focus of crystal engineering since Ermer & Eling (1994) and Hanessian et al. (1994) noticed the complementarity of hydroxy and amino groups as regards hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors. Shortly after it was demonstrated with simple 1,2- and 1,3-aminophenols that molecular features, such as functional groups, do not necessarily result in a single manner of the molecular arrangement, and that strong N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonding is frequently unable to exclude other factors from controlling the crystal packing (Allen et al., 1997; Dey et al. 2005). Here we report on the
of a simple aminonaphthol which, as regards the substitution pattern, can be considered as an analogue of 1,4-aminophenol.The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1, and the geometrical parameters are available in the archived
Whereas 1,4-aminophenol forms a tetrahedral network, via N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonds (Ermer & Eling, 1994), in the title compound the molecules are connected via chains of ···N—H···O—H··· interactions to form a two-dimensional polymeric structure (Fig. 2, Table 1). The two-dimensional assembly of the molecules joined by hydrogen bonding resembles that formed by 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene (Belskii et al., 1990). One amino H-atom is not involved in hydrogen bonding and does not take part in any other specific interactions.For the
of 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene, see: Belskii et al. (1990). For amino-hydroxy group recognition and packing motifs of aminols, see: Ermer & Eling (1994); Hanessian et al. (1994); Allen et al. (1997); Dey et al. (2005).Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); cell
CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).C10H9NO | Dx = 1.353 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 159.18 | Melting point: 461 K |
Orthorhombic, P212121 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab | Cell parameters from 2383 reflections |
a = 4.8607 (2) Å | θ = 4–27° |
b = 12.3175 (6) Å | µ = 0.09 mm−1 |
c = 13.0565 (5) Å | T = 130 K |
V = 781.71 (6) Å3 | Plate, pale pink |
Z = 4 | 0.30 × 0.15 × 0.02 mm |
F(000) = 336 |
Kuma KM-4-CCD κ-geometry diffractometer | 726 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.037 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 4.5° |
ω scans | h = −6→5 |
8484 measured reflections | k = −15→15 |
963 independent reflections | l = −16→16 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.091 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.06 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0554P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
963 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
121 parameters | Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 |
C10H9NO | V = 781.71 (6) Å3 |
Mr = 159.18 | Z = 4 |
Orthorhombic, P212121 | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 4.8607 (2) Å | µ = 0.09 mm−1 |
b = 12.3175 (6) Å | T = 130 K |
c = 13.0565 (5) Å | 0.30 × 0.15 × 0.02 mm |
Kuma KM-4-CCD κ-geometry diffractometer | 726 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
8484 measured reflections | Rint = 0.037 |
963 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.091 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.06 | Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 |
963 reflections | Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 |
121 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.2605 (5) | 0.48405 (18) | 0.50574 (15) | 0.0232 (5) | |
C2 | 0.1125 (5) | 0.57846 (19) | 0.51109 (17) | 0.0269 (6) | |
H2 | −0.0135 | 0.5887 | 0.5638 | 0.032* | |
C3 | 0.1504 (5) | 0.65964 (19) | 0.43738 (17) | 0.0268 (6) | |
H3 | 0.0466 | 0.7230 | 0.4409 | 0.032* | |
C4 | 0.3386 (5) | 0.64703 (19) | 0.35998 (17) | 0.0248 (6) | |
H4 | 0.3630 | 0.7022 | 0.3122 | 0.030* | |
C5 | 0.6956 (5) | 0.53275 (18) | 0.27339 (16) | 0.0239 (6) | |
C6 | 0.8417 (5) | 0.43775 (19) | 0.26935 (17) | 0.0265 (6) | |
H6 | 0.9701 | 0.4269 | 0.2175 | 0.032* | |
C7 | 0.7983 (5) | 0.35673 (19) | 0.34304 (17) | 0.0283 (6) | |
H7 | 0.9009 | 0.2931 | 0.3399 | 0.034* | |
C8 | 0.6085 (5) | 0.36936 (19) | 0.41937 (17) | 0.0256 (6) | |
H8 | 0.5795 | 0.3141 | 0.4667 | 0.031* | |
C9 | 0.4571 (5) | 0.46670 (19) | 0.42580 (16) | 0.0215 (5) | |
C10 | 0.4964 (5) | 0.55036 (18) | 0.35220 (16) | 0.0215 (5) | |
O11 | 0.2370 (4) | 0.40173 (13) | 0.57550 (11) | 0.0289 (4) | |
H11O | 0.067 (7) | 0.404 (2) | 0.609 (2) | 0.058 (10)* | |
N12 | 0.7265 (5) | 0.61211 (18) | 0.19544 (14) | 0.0275 (5) | |
H12A | 0.699 (6) | 0.685 (2) | 0.2155 (18) | 0.044 (8)* | |
H12B | 0.899 (6) | 0.601 (2) | 0.1610 (19) | 0.038 (8)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0231 (12) | 0.0279 (13) | 0.0186 (10) | −0.0035 (12) | −0.0020 (11) | 0.0014 (10) |
C2 | 0.0250 (13) | 0.0332 (14) | 0.0226 (11) | −0.0002 (12) | 0.0011 (11) | −0.0024 (11) |
C3 | 0.0261 (13) | 0.0255 (13) | 0.0288 (12) | 0.0028 (12) | −0.0008 (11) | −0.0047 (11) |
C4 | 0.0250 (13) | 0.0272 (13) | 0.0223 (11) | −0.0030 (11) | −0.0017 (11) | 0.0001 (10) |
C5 | 0.0244 (14) | 0.0283 (13) | 0.0192 (10) | −0.0070 (11) | −0.0053 (10) | −0.0014 (10) |
C6 | 0.0232 (13) | 0.0334 (13) | 0.0229 (11) | 0.0006 (12) | 0.0024 (10) | −0.0056 (11) |
C7 | 0.0294 (15) | 0.0244 (13) | 0.0311 (12) | 0.0055 (12) | −0.0022 (11) | −0.0044 (11) |
C8 | 0.0273 (13) | 0.0278 (13) | 0.0216 (11) | −0.0011 (11) | −0.0013 (11) | −0.0004 (10) |
C9 | 0.0187 (12) | 0.0263 (13) | 0.0194 (10) | −0.0006 (11) | −0.0030 (10) | −0.0036 (10) |
C10 | 0.0204 (12) | 0.0249 (13) | 0.0191 (10) | −0.0044 (11) | −0.0044 (10) | −0.0006 (10) |
O11 | 0.0269 (9) | 0.0356 (10) | 0.0243 (8) | −0.0003 (9) | 0.0036 (8) | 0.0061 (8) |
N12 | 0.0271 (12) | 0.0316 (13) | 0.0237 (10) | −0.0025 (12) | 0.0005 (10) | 0.0016 (9) |
C1—O11 | 1.368 (2) | C5—C10 | 1.430 (3) |
C1—C2 | 1.369 (3) | C6—C7 | 1.402 (3) |
C1—C9 | 1.431 (3) | C6—H6 | 0.9300 |
C2—C3 | 1.400 (3) | C7—C8 | 1.367 (3) |
C2—H2 | 0.9300 | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
C3—C4 | 1.372 (3) | C8—C9 | 1.409 (3) |
C3—H3 | 0.9300 | C8—H8 | 0.9300 |
C4—C10 | 1.420 (3) | C9—C10 | 1.422 (3) |
C4—H4 | 0.9300 | O11—H11O | 0.94 (3) |
C5—C6 | 1.370 (3) | N12—H12A | 0.95 (3) |
C5—N12 | 1.419 (3) | N12—H12B | 0.96 (3) |
O11—C1—C2 | 123.5 (2) | C7—C6—H6 | 119.9 |
O11—C1—C9 | 115.5 (2) | C8—C7—C6 | 121.4 (2) |
C2—C1—C9 | 120.99 (19) | C8—C7—H7 | 119.3 |
C1—C2—C3 | 120.2 (2) | C6—C7—H7 | 119.3 |
C1—C2—H2 | 119.9 | C7—C8—C9 | 119.5 (2) |
C3—C2—H2 | 119.9 | C7—C8—H8 | 120.2 |
C4—C3—C2 | 120.9 (2) | C9—C8—H8 | 120.2 |
C4—C3—H3 | 119.6 | C8—C9—C10 | 120.4 (2) |
C2—C3—H3 | 119.6 | C8—C9—C1 | 121.3 (2) |
C3—C4—C10 | 120.5 (2) | C10—C9—C1 | 118.3 (2) |
C3—C4—H4 | 119.7 | C4—C10—C9 | 119.1 (2) |
C10—C4—H4 | 119.7 | C4—C10—C5 | 123.0 (2) |
C6—C5—N12 | 120.4 (2) | C9—C10—C5 | 117.9 (2) |
C6—C5—C10 | 120.6 (2) | C1—O11—H11O | 111.6 (18) |
N12—C5—C10 | 118.9 (2) | C5—N12—H12A | 116.2 (15) |
C5—C6—C7 | 120.2 (2) | C5—N12—H12B | 109.1 (15) |
C5—C6—H6 | 119.9 | H12A—N12—H12B | 113 (2) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O11—H11O···N12i | 0.94 (3) | 1.83 (3) | 2.749 (3) | 167 (3) |
N12—H12B···O11ii | 0.96 (3) | 2.09 (3) | 3.046 (3) | 171 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (ii) −x+3/2, −y+1, z−1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C10H9NO |
Mr | 159.18 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, P212121 |
Temperature (K) | 130 |
a, b, c (Å) | 4.8607 (2), 12.3175 (6), 13.0565 (5) |
V (Å3) | 781.71 (6) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.09 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.30 × 0.15 × 0.02 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Kuma KM-4-CCD κ-geometry |
Absorption correction | – |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 8484, 963, 726 |
Rint | 0.037 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.625 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.036, 0.091, 1.06 |
No. of reflections | 963 |
No. of parameters | 121 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.17, −0.21 |
Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2007), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O11—H11O···N12i | 0.94 (3) | 1.83 (3) | 2.749 (3) | 167 (3) |
N12—H12B···O11ii | 0.96 (3) | 2.09 (3) | 3.046 (3) | 171 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (ii) −x+3/2, −y+1, z−1/2. |
References
Allen, F. H., Hoy, V. J., Howard, J. A. K., Thalladi, V. R., Desiraju, G. R., Wilson, C. C. & McIntyre, G. J. (1997). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 3477–3480. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Belskii, V. K., Kharchenko, E. V., Sobolev, A. N., Zavodnik, V. E., Kolomiets, N. A., Prober, G. S. & Oleksenko, L. P. (1990). Zh. Strukt. Khim. 31, 116–121. CAS Google Scholar
Dey, A., Kirchner, M. T., Vangala, V. R., Desiraju, G. R., Mondal, R. & Howard, J. A. K. (2005). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 10545–10559. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ermer, O. & Eling, A. J. (1994). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 925–944. CrossRef Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hanessian, S., Gomtsyan, A., Simard, M. & Roelens, S. (1994). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 4495–4496. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction, Abingdon, England. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Amino-hydroxy group recognition has been at the focus of crystal engineering since Ermer & Eling (1994) and Hanessian et al. (1994) noticed the complementarity of hydroxy and amino groups as regards hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors. Shortly after it was demonstrated with simple 1,2- and 1,3-aminophenols that molecular features, such as functional groups, do not necessarily result in a single manner of the molecular arrangement, and that strong N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonding is frequently unable to exclude other factors from controlling the crystal packing (Allen et al., 1997; Dey et al. 2005). Here we report on the crystal structure of a simple aminonaphthol which, as regards the substitution pattern, can be considered as an analogue of 1,4-aminophenol.
The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1, and the geometrical parameters are available in the archived CIF. Whereas 1,4-aminophenol forms a tetrahedral network, via N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonds (Ermer & Eling, 1994), in the title compound the molecules are connected via chains of ···N—H···O—H··· interactions to form a two-dimensional polymeric structure (Fig. 2, Table 1). The two-dimensional assembly of the molecules joined by hydrogen bonding resembles that formed by 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene (Belskii et al., 1990). One amino H-atom is not involved in hydrogen bonding and does not take part in any other specific interactions.