organic compounds
L-Serine methyl ester hydrochloride
aBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Crystal and Structural Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
*Correspondence e-mail: m.lutz@uu.nl
In the enantiopure crystal of the title compound, C4H10NO3+·Cl−, intermolecular O—H⋯Cl and N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds link the molecules into layers parallel to (001).
Related literature
Esterification of the carboxyl group of amino acids plays an important role in the synthesis of ). For related structures, see: Bryndal et al. (2006); Görbitz (1989). For the determination of the see: Flack & Bernardinelli (2000); Flack & Shmueli (2007); Hooft et al. (2008).
especially due to the increased solubility in non-aquous organic solvents, see: Bodanszky (1993Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); cell PEAKREF (Schreurs, 2005); data reduction: EVAL15 (Xian et al., 2006) and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON.
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536809046480/vm2012sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809046480/vm2012Isup2.hkl
0.4 g of L-serine methyl ester hydrochloride (obtained commercially from Aldrich) was dissolved in 10 ml absolute ethanol followed by slow evaporation at room temperature. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained after a final seeding step by adding a tiny amount of solid starting material.
All H atoms were located in difference Fourier maps. H atoms bonded to N and O atoms were refined freely with isotropic displacement parameters. H(C) atoms were refined using a riding model (including
of the methyl substituents), with C—H = 0.95–1.00 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2 (1.5 for methyl groups) times Ueq(C).Friedel pairs were kept separate during the
and the was included in the least-squares matrix using TWIN/BASF instructions in SHELXL97. This has been shown to reduce the uncertainty of the compared to the hole-in-one algorithm (Flack & Bernardinelli, 2000).Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); cell
PEAKREF (Schreurs, 2005); data reduction: EVAL15 (Xian et al., 2006) and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009).Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I), with atom labels and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms. | |
Fig. 2. The packing of (I), viewed down the b axis, showing sheets running parallel to (001) with molecules connected by O—H···Cl and N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds (dashed lines). H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity. |
C4H10NO3+·Cl− | F(000) = 164 |
Mr = 155.58 | Dx = 1.328 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: P 2yb | Cell parameters from 14244 reflections |
a = 5.22645 (9) Å | θ = 1.8–35.0° |
b = 6.39388 (14) Å | µ = 0.44 mm−1 |
c = 11.6420 (4) Å | T = 150 K |
β = 90.090 (1)° | Irregular plate, colourless |
V = 389.04 (2) Å3 | 0.38 × 0.33 × 0.15 mm |
Z = 2 |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 3449 independent reflections |
Radiation source: rotating anode | 3242 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.030 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 35.0°, θmin = 1.8° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) | h = −8→8 |
Tmin = 0.78, Tmax = 0.93 | k = −10→10 |
15456 measured reflections | l = −18→18 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.058 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0329P)2 + 0.0147P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.07 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.002 |
3449 reflections | Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3 |
100 parameters | Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 |
1 restraint | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1600 Friedel pairs |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: 0.00 (3) |
C4H10NO3+·Cl− | V = 389.04 (2) Å3 |
Mr = 155.58 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21 | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 5.22645 (9) Å | µ = 0.44 mm−1 |
b = 6.39388 (14) Å | T = 150 K |
c = 11.6420 (4) Å | 0.38 × 0.33 × 0.15 mm |
β = 90.090 (1)° |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 3449 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) | 3242 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.78, Tmax = 0.93 | Rint = 0.030 |
15456 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.058 | Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3 |
S = 1.07 | Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 |
3449 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1600 Friedel pairs |
100 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: 0.00 (3) |
1 restraint |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O1 | 0.19488 (14) | 0.39944 (12) | 0.93010 (6) | 0.03194 (14) | |
O2 | 0.32242 (18) | 0.69384 (13) | 0.84254 (7) | 0.04120 (18) | |
O3 | 0.57878 (12) | 0.22667 (10) | 0.72179 (7) | 0.02923 (13) | |
H3 | 0.644 (3) | 0.119 (3) | 0.6913 (14) | 0.045 (4)* | |
N1 | 0.25944 (14) | 0.54258 (11) | 0.63222 (7) | 0.02279 (12) | |
H1A | 0.411 (3) | 0.597 (3) | 0.6391 (12) | 0.037 (4)* | |
H1B | 0.254 (3) | 0.473 (3) | 0.5725 (15) | 0.045 (4)* | |
H1C | 0.149 (2) | 0.643 (2) | 0.6261 (11) | 0.029 (3)* | |
C1 | 0.24364 (16) | 0.51767 (14) | 0.83958 (7) | 0.02379 (14) | |
C2 | 0.18095 (14) | 0.40362 (12) | 0.72813 (7) | 0.02175 (13) | |
H2 | −0.0084 | 0.3827 | 0.7239 | 0.026* | |
C3 | 0.31005 (16) | 0.19224 (13) | 0.71800 (8) | 0.02470 (14) | |
H3A | 0.2571 | 0.1003 | 0.7821 | 0.030* | |
H3B | 0.2616 | 0.1242 | 0.6447 | 0.030* | |
C4 | 0.2501 (2) | 0.49492 (19) | 1.04131 (9) | 0.0378 (2) | |
H4A | 0.4322 | 0.5307 | 1.0456 | 0.057* | |
H4B | 0.2079 | 0.3961 | 1.1028 | 0.057* | |
H4C | 0.1473 | 0.6220 | 1.0502 | 0.057* | |
Cl1 | 0.77391 (3) | 0.81723 (3) | 0.608559 (15) | 0.02488 (4) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O1 | 0.0416 (3) | 0.0290 (3) | 0.0252 (3) | −0.0042 (3) | 0.0023 (2) | 0.0007 (2) |
O2 | 0.0668 (5) | 0.0250 (3) | 0.0317 (3) | −0.0129 (4) | −0.0020 (3) | −0.0044 (3) |
O3 | 0.0229 (3) | 0.0219 (3) | 0.0429 (4) | 0.0033 (2) | −0.0034 (2) | −0.0061 (2) |
N1 | 0.0220 (3) | 0.0201 (3) | 0.0263 (3) | 0.0021 (2) | −0.0026 (2) | −0.0013 (2) |
C1 | 0.0236 (3) | 0.0218 (3) | 0.0260 (3) | 0.0014 (3) | 0.0001 (3) | −0.0023 (3) |
C2 | 0.0187 (3) | 0.0196 (3) | 0.0270 (3) | −0.0016 (3) | −0.0014 (2) | −0.0012 (3) |
C3 | 0.0250 (3) | 0.0168 (3) | 0.0323 (4) | −0.0016 (3) | −0.0027 (3) | −0.0025 (3) |
C4 | 0.0485 (6) | 0.0403 (5) | 0.0248 (4) | 0.0096 (4) | 0.0003 (4) | −0.0030 (4) |
Cl1 | 0.02321 (7) | 0.02180 (7) | 0.02965 (8) | 0.00378 (7) | 0.00166 (5) | 0.00182 (8) |
O1—C1 | 1.3221 (11) | C1—C2 | 1.5235 (12) |
O1—C4 | 1.4598 (13) | C2—C3 | 1.5153 (12) |
O2—C1 | 1.1998 (11) | C2—H2 | 1.0000 |
O3—C3 | 1.4223 (10) | C3—H3A | 0.9900 |
O3—H3 | 0.847 (18) | C3—H3B | 0.9900 |
N1—C2 | 1.4852 (11) | C4—H4A | 0.9800 |
N1—H1A | 0.867 (16) | C4—H4B | 0.9800 |
N1—H1B | 0.825 (18) | C4—H4C | 0.9800 |
N1—H1C | 0.865 (14) | ||
C1—O1—C4 | 115.45 (8) | C3—C2—H2 | 108.5 |
C3—O3—H3 | 104.9 (11) | C1—C2—H2 | 108.5 |
C2—N1—H1A | 115.1 (10) | O3—C3—C2 | 107.42 (6) |
C2—N1—H1B | 107.6 (12) | O3—C3—H3A | 110.2 |
H1A—N1—H1B | 108.9 (14) | C2—C3—H3A | 110.2 |
C2—N1—H1C | 108.6 (9) | O3—C3—H3B | 110.2 |
H1A—N1—H1C | 108.6 (14) | C2—C3—H3B | 110.2 |
H1B—N1—H1C | 107.7 (14) | H3A—C3—H3B | 108.5 |
O2—C1—O1 | 125.48 (9) | O1—C4—H4A | 109.5 |
O2—C1—C2 | 123.17 (8) | O1—C4—H4B | 109.5 |
O1—C1—C2 | 111.33 (7) | H4A—C4—H4B | 109.5 |
N1—C2—C3 | 110.58 (7) | O1—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
N1—C2—C1 | 107.14 (6) | H4A—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
C3—C2—C1 | 113.45 (7) | H4B—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
N1—C2—H2 | 108.5 | ||
C4—O1—C1—O2 | −1.64 (14) | O2—C1—C2—C3 | 127.65 (10) |
C4—O1—C1—C2 | 179.72 (7) | O1—C1—C2—C3 | −53.67 (9) |
O2—C1—C2—N1 | 5.33 (11) | N1—C2—C3—O3 | 59.87 (9) |
O1—C1—C2—N1 | −175.99 (7) | C1—C2—C3—O3 | −60.53 (9) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1A···Cl1 | 0.867 (16) | 2.390 (16) | 3.2237 (8) | 161.2 (14) |
N1—H1B···Cl1i | 0.825 (18) | 2.336 (18) | 3.1563 (8) | 172.7 (16) |
N1—H1C···Cl1ii | 0.865 (14) | 2.264 (14) | 3.0979 (7) | 161.9 (12) |
O3—H3···Cl1iii | 0.847 (18) | 2.261 (18) | 3.1041 (7) | 173.9 (15) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1; (ii) x−1, y, z; (iii) x, y−1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C4H10NO3+·Cl− |
Mr | 155.58 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21 |
Temperature (K) | 150 |
a, b, c (Å) | 5.22645 (9), 6.39388 (14), 11.6420 (4) |
β (°) | 90.090 (1) |
V (Å3) | 389.04 (2) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.44 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.38 × 0.33 × 0.15 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.78, 0.93 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 15456, 3449, 3242 |
Rint | 0.030 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.807 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.022, 0.058, 1.07 |
No. of reflections | 3449 |
No. of parameters | 100 |
No. of restraints | 1 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.25, −0.17 |
Absolute structure | Flack (1983), 1600 Friedel pairs |
Absolute structure parameter | 0.00 (3) |
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999), PEAKREF (Schreurs, 2005), EVAL15 (Xian et al., 2006) and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2002), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2009).
O1—C1 | 1.3221 (11) | N1—C2 | 1.4852 (11) |
O1—C4 | 1.4598 (13) | C1—C2 | 1.5235 (12) |
O2—C1 | 1.1998 (11) | C2—C3 | 1.5153 (12) |
O3—C3 | 1.4223 (10) | ||
C1—O1—C4 | 115.45 (8) | N1—C2—C3 | 110.58 (7) |
C3—O3—H3 | 104.9 (11) | N1—C2—C1 | 107.14 (6) |
O2—C1—O1 | 125.48 (9) | C3—C2—C1 | 113.45 (7) |
O2—C1—C2 | 123.17 (8) | O3—C3—C2 | 107.42 (6) |
O1—C1—C2 | 111.33 (7) | ||
C4—O1—C1—O2 | −1.64 (14) | O2—C1—C2—C3 | 127.65 (10) |
C4—O1—C1—C2 | 179.72 (7) | O1—C1—C2—C3 | −53.67 (9) |
O2—C1—C2—N1 | 5.33 (11) | N1—C2—C3—O3 | 59.87 (9) |
O1—C1—C2—N1 | −175.99 (7) | C1—C2—C3—O3 | −60.53 (9) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1A···Cl1 | 0.867 (16) | 2.390 (16) | 3.2237 (8) | 161.2 (14) |
N1—H1B···Cl1i | 0.825 (18) | 2.336 (18) | 3.1563 (8) | 172.7 (16) |
N1—H1C···Cl1ii | 0.865 (14) | 2.264 (14) | 3.0979 (7) | 161.9 (12) |
O3—H3···Cl1iii | 0.847 (18) | 2.261 (18) | 3.1041 (7) | 173.9 (15) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1; (ii) x−1, y, z; (iii) x, y−1, z. |
Acknowledgements
Financial assistance for this project was provided by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research, Chemical Sciences (NWO-CW).
References
Bodanszky, M. (1993). Principles of Peptide Synthesis, 2nd ed., pp. 74–86. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Bryndal, I., Jaremko, M., Jaremko, L. & Lis, T. (2006). Acta Cryst. C62, o111–o114. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Flack, H. D. & Bernardinelli, G. (2000). J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 1143–1148. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Flack, H. D. & Shmueli, U. (2007). Acta Cryst. A63, 257–265. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Görbitz, C. H. (1989). Acta Chem. Scand. 43, 871–875. Google Scholar
Hooft, R. W. W., Straver, L. H. & Spek, A. L. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 96–103. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nonius (1999). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Schreurs, A. M. M. (2005). PEAKREF. Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2002). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Xian, X., Schreurs, A. M. M. & Kroon-Batenburg, L. M. J. (2006). Acta Cryst. A62, s92. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Esterification of the carboxyl group of amino acids plays an important role in the synthesis of peptides, especially due to the increased solubility in non-aquous organic solvents (Bodanszky, 1993). The synthesis of methyl esters is straightforward and can be performed by the reaction of HCl gas with a suspension of the amino acid in methanol. In this reaction the hydrochloride of the amino acid methyl ester is obtained, which is the subject of the present study.
A molecular plot of the title compound (I) is shown in Fig. 1. As a consequence of the protection of the carboxyl group, only the amino group is available as protonation site. The O1—C1—C2—N1 and C4—O1—C1—C2 torsion angles of -175.99 (7) and 179.72 (7) ° indicate an extended structure of the backbone. Nevertheless, we do not see a stabilization of this extended structure by an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the ammonium group and O2. Such a stabilization would require a N—H bond in the plane of O2—C1—C2—N1, which is not the case here. Similar extended structures are also found in the methyl ester hydrochlorides of L-cysteine (Görbitz, 1989) and L-tyrosine (Bryndal et al., 2006). Bond lengths and angles in (I) are as expected (Table 1).
With three H-atoms at N1 and one H-atom at O3 the molecule has four hydrogen bond donors. Three oxygen atoms and the chloride anion could act as hydrogen bond acceptors. In fact, only the chloride is used as a hydrogen bond acceptor, here (Table 2). This results in an infinite two-dimensional hydrogen bonding network parallel to the ab plane, as shown in Fig. 2. In the c direction the hydrogen-bonded planes are separated by hydrophobic OCH3 groups. Interestingly, the two-dimensional motif is also reflected in the morphology of the crystal, where (001) has the smallest dimension.
Despite a β-angle of 90.090 (1)° there is no orthorhombic symmetry in this crystal structure. The Rint value for Laue-symmetry mmm is 31% compared to 2% for 2/m. We also did not find indications for pseudo-orthorhombic twinning. The reflections in the diffraction images were not split, and an analysis of the Fo/Fc listing with the TWINROTMAT routine of PLATON (Spek, 2009) did not suggest the presence of twinning.
Because (I) is derived from enantiopure L-serine, the absolute configuration was known in advance. Nevertheless, the presence of chloride provides enough enantiomorph distinguishing power (Friedif = 123, Flack & Shmueli, 2007) to allow a reliable experimental confirmation of the absolute structure. This was done using the Flack parameter (Flack, 1983), which resulted in x = 0.00 (3), and the Hooft parameter (Hooft et al., 2008), which resulted in y = 0.005 (15). As expected, the standard uncertainty of the Hooft parameter is significantly lower than in the Flack parameter, but both parameters confirm the correct absolute structure of (I).