inorganic compounds
(Ga0.71B0.29)PO4 with a high-cristobalite-type structure refined from powder data
aDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People's Republic of China, and bChinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai 200050, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: yaxihuang@xmu.edu.cn
Gallium boron phosphate, (Ga0.71B0.29)PO4, was synthesized by a high-temperature solid-state reaction method. The is isostructural with the tetragonal high-cristobalite structure with P which is built from alternating Ga(B)O4 and PO4 tetrahedra interconnected by sharing the common O-atom vertices, resulting in a three-dimensional structure with two-dimensional six-membered-ring tunnels running along the a and b axes.
Related literature
For information on cristobalite structures, see: Achary et al. (2003). For borophosphate structures, see: Ewald et al. (2007); Mi et al. (1999); Schmidt et al. (2004); Schulze (1934); Dachille & Glasser (1959); Mackenzie et al. (1959). For the catalytic properties of BPO4, see: Moffat (1978); Moffat & Schmidtmeyer (1986); Mooney (1956); Morey et al. (1983); Tada et al. (1987); Tartarelli et al. (1970). For crystallographic background, see: Finger et al. (1994)); Thompson et al. (1987).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection
|
Refinement
|
Cell GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004); data reduction: GSAS; program(s) used to refine structure: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: GSAS.
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810000358/br2131sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Rietveld powder data: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810000358/br2131Isup2.rtv
The title compound has been synthesized via high temperature solid state reaction method and the structure refined from X-ray powder diffraction data. A mixture of H3BO3, NH4H2PO4, and Ga2O3 with molar ratio of B:Ga:P = 12:3:4 was well ground and reacted first at 973 K for 4 h, then cooled down to room temperature and reground again, pressed into pellets and reacted at 1373 K for 8 h, at last shut down the furnace and cooled down to room temperature. The extra B2O3 in the products were washed out by hot water.
The cell parameters were obtained by least-square fits of the powder diffractometer data using silicon (a = 5.4308 Å) as an internal standard. Although the powder pattern and cell parameters are quite different from BPO4, the starting atomic positional parameters can still be derived from the prototype BPO4 (Schmidt et al., 2004). During the initial
the unreasonable negative thermal parameters for the B position are indicative of partial substitutions by Ga. The boron position then were assumed to be occupied by two kinds of atoms and the occupacies were allowed to vary during the subsequent refinements. Because it is difficult to refine both the occupation numbers and atomic displacement parameters at the same time, a two-step process was applied to refine the occupancy numbers and atomic displacement parameters. At the begining, all the atomic displacement parameters were set to one value to refine the occupancy number, then fixed the occupany number to refine the displacement parameters. Both processes were performed alternately several times till reasonable values for both atomic occupancies and displacement parameters were obtained. Due to the individual the standard deviations given by the program are much too small to be a realistic estimate of the uncertainty.The high-cristobalite boron phosphate has long been used as an effective catalyst for various organic reactions such as hydration, dehydration,
(Moffat, 1978; Moffat & Schmidtmeyer, 1986; Morey et al., 1983; Tada et al., 1987; Tartarelli et al., 1970). The catalytic activities depend on the ratio of P/B and surface area. In the case of excess B content, BPO4 catalysts consist predominately of sites, and show catalytic efficiencies for the dehydration. In contrast, in a region consisting of excess phosphorus P content, BPO4 catalysts have more Brønsted acid sites and exhibit catalytic activities for hydration. Applying trivalent cations to partially substitute boron may vary the ratio of P/B and modify the catalytic property. The possibility of modifying the catalytic properties by varieties of P/B ratio and searching for new phases in the borophosphate system intrigue us to investigate systems containing larger trivalent metal cations. In our previous investigations, a series of compounds with boron partially substituted by transition metals, such as Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu, has been characterized with low cristobalite type structure (Mi et al., 1999). When we applied a smaller trivalent element Ga to modify the BPO4, the occupancy of Ga is more than 50%, while less than 50% for transition metal compounds (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu). In consequence, the structure of (Ga0.71B0.29)PO4 are high-cristobalite structure instead of low-cristobalite type structure.The 4 which is built from alternating (Ga, B)O4 and PO4 tetrahedra interconnected by sharing the common O-vertices, resulting in a three dimensional network with two dimensional 6-membered ring tunnels running along the a- and b-axis, respectively. Every TO4 (T = Ga(B), P) tetrahedron connects to four neighboring TO4 tetrahedra. There are three types of positions for T-atoms. (Ga, B)1 and (Ga, B)2 sit at 1c and 1b, while P at 2g. The long (Schläfli) notation for (Ga, B) nodes is 62.62.62.62.62.62, while 62.62.62.62.62.62 for the P nodes, giving the net symbol (62.62.62.62.62.62)3 which can be represented by the short symbol (66)3.
of (Ga0.71B0.29)PO4 is isostructural with the tetragonal high-cristobalite structure (Schulze, 1934; Schmidt et al., 2004) with PThe (Ga, B)1–O and (Ga, B)2–O bond distances are 1.7079 (5) Å and 1.6979 (5) Å in the (Ga, B)O4 tetrahedra which are significantly larger than the B–O bond value of 1.463 Å in BPO4 (Schmidt et al., 2004), but smaller than the bond values of 1.829 Å for Ga–O bond in GaPO4 (Achary et al., 2003), indicating that boron and gallium occupy the same position. After refining both the atomic occupation number and displacement parameters, it results in the ratio of Ga:B = 0.71:0.29. In turn, the Ga:P is 1.42:2, which is quite good agreement with that (Ga:P = 3:4) in the reactants for obtaining the pure phase. The introduction of gallium in the compound led to the deformation of all the tetrahedra and quite anisotropic expansion of the structure which results in lowering symmetry from 4 of BPO4 to P4 for the new compound.
IFor information on cristobalite structures, see: Achary et al. (2003). For borophosphate structures, see: Ewald et al. (2007); Mi et al. (1999); Schmidt et al. (2004); Schulze (1934). For the catalytic properties of BPO4, see: Moffat (1978); Moffat & Schmidtmeyer (1986); Mooney (1956); Morey et al. (1983); Tada et al. (1987); Tartarelli et al. (1970). For related literature, see: Dachille & Glasser (1959); Mackenzie et al. (1959).For crystallographic background, see: Finger et al. (1994); Thompson et al. (1987).
Data collection: PLEASE SUPPLY; cell
PLEASE SUPPLY; data reduction: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: PLEASE SUPPLY; program(s) used to refine structure: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: PLEASE SUPPLY.(Ga0.71B0.29)PO4 | Z = 2 |
Mr = 147.61 | F(000) = 140.4 |
Tetragonal, P4 | Dx = 3.084 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: P -4 | Cu Kα1, Cu Kα2 radiation, λ = 1.540500, 1.544300 Å |
a = 4.7343 (1) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 7.0896 (4) Å | white |
V = 158.90 (1) Å3 | flat sheet, 10 × 10 mm |
Rigaku-D/max automatic powder diffractometer | Data collection mode: reflection |
Graphite monochromator | Scan method: step |
Specimen mounting: packed powder pellet | 2θmin = 15.026°, 2θmax = 100.016°, 2θstep = 0.01° |
Least-squares matrix: full | Profile function: Thompson et al. (1987); Finger et al. (1994); Stephens et al. (1999) |
Rp = 0.076 | 35 parameters |
Rwp = 0.129 | 2 restraints |
Rexp = 0.072 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
R(F2) = 0.07586 | Background function: The background function is a cosine Fourier series with a leading constant term. Ib= B1+ΣBjcos[P*(j-1)] (j=2-9), here P = 2θ, Bj (j = 1-9) values are given below: 1: 935.903 2: -1634.98 3: 1422.47 4: -1094.93 5: 681.394 6: -358.046 7: 116.953 8: -17.2104 9: -22.9558 |
8500 data points |
(Ga0.71B0.29)PO4 | V = 158.90 (1) Å3 |
Mr = 147.61 | Z = 2 |
Tetragonal, P4 | Cu Kα1, Cu Kα2 radiation, λ = 1.540500, 1.544300 Å |
a = 4.7343 (1) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 7.0896 (4) Å | flat sheet, 10 × 10 mm |
Rigaku-D/max automatic powder diffractometer | Scan method: step |
Specimen mounting: packed powder pellet | 2θmin = 15.026°, 2θmax = 100.016°, 2θstep = 0.01° |
Data collection mode: reflection |
Rp = 0.076 | 8500 data points |
Rwp = 0.129 | 35 parameters |
Rexp = 0.072 | 2 restraints |
R(F2) = 0.07586 |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Ga1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0347 (12)* | 0.7002 (4) |
Ga2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0406 (11)* | 0.7179 (3) |
P1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.7456 (5) | 0.0447 (12)* | |
O1 | 0.7299 (3) | 0.1326 (3) | 0.6304 (5) | 0.0493 (15)* | |
O2 | 0.6286 (3) | 0.7718 (4) | 0.8669 (5) | 0.0511 (16)* | |
B1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0347 (12)* | 0.2998 (4) |
B2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0406 (11)* | 0.2821 (3) |
(Ga/B)1—P1i | 2.9759 (8) | (Ga/B)2—O1ix | 1.6979 (5) |
(Ga/B)1—P1ii | 2.9759 (8) | (Ga/B)2—O1x | 1.6979 (5) |
(Ga/B)1—P1iii | 2.9759 (8) | P1—O1 | 1.499 (3) |
(Ga/B)1—P1iv | 2.9759 (8) | P1—O1ix | 1.499 (3) |
(Ga/B)1—O2i | 1.7079 (5) | P1—O2xi | 1.509 (3) |
(Ga/B)1—O2iii | 1.7079 (5) | P1—O2xii | 1.509 (3) |
(Ga/B)1—O2v | 1.7079 (5) | B1—O2i | 1.7079 (5) |
(Ga/B)1—O2vi | 1.7079 (5) | B1—O2iii | 1.7079 (5) |
(Ga/B)2—P1vii | 2.9386 (8) | B1—O2v | 1.7079 (5) |
(Ga/B)2—P1 | 2.9386 (8) | B1—O2vi | 1.7079 (5) |
(Ga/B)2—P1viii | 2.9386 (8) | B2—O1vii | 1.6979 (5) |
(Ga/B)2—P1iii | 2.9386 (8) | B2—O1iii | 1.6979 (5) |
(Ga/B)2—O1vii | 1.6979 (5) | B2—O1ix | 1.6979 (5) |
(Ga/B)2—O1iii | 1.6979 (5) | B2—O1x | 1.6979 (5) |
O2i—(Ga/B)1—O2iii | 107.765 (2) | O2xi—P1—O2xii | 110.502 (4) |
O2i—(Ga/B)1—O2v | 112.941 (3) | (Ga/B)2xiii—O1—P1 | 133.541 (1) |
O2i—(Ga/B)1—O2vi | 107.765 (2) | P1—O1—B2xiii | 133.541 (1) |
O2iii—(Ga/B)1—O2v | 107.765 (2) | (Ga/B)1xiv—O2—P1xv | 135.267 (1) |
O2iii—(Ga/B)1—O2vi | 112.941 (3) | P1xv—O2—B1xiv | 135.267 (1) |
O2v—(Ga/B)1—O2vi | 107.765 (2) | O2i—B1—O2iii | 107.765 (2) |
O1vii—(Ga/B)2—O1iii | 107.239 (2) | O2i—B1—O2v | 112.941 (3) |
O1vii—(Ga/B)2—O1ix | 114.035 (3) | O2i—B1—O2vi | 107.765 (2) |
O1vii—(Ga/B)2—O1x | 107.239 (2) | O2iii—B1—O2v | 107.765 (2) |
O1iii—(Ga/B)2—O1ix | 107.239 (2) | O2iii—B1—O2vi | 112.941 (3) |
O1iii—(Ga/B)2—O1x | 114.035 (3) | O2v—B1—O2vi | 107.765 (2) |
O1ix—(Ga/B)2—O1x | 107.239 (2) | O1vii—B2—O1iii | 107.239 (2) |
O1—P1—O1ix | 113.942 (3) | O1vii—B2—O1ix | 114.035 (3) |
O1—P1—O2xi | 108.506 (2) | O1vii—B2—O1x | 107.239 (2) |
O1—P1—O2xii | 107.696 (2) | O1iii—B2—O1ix | 107.239 (2) |
O1ix—P1—O2xi | 107.696 (2) | O1iii—B2—O1x | 114.035 (3) |
O1ix—P1—O2xii | 108.506 (2) | O1ix—B2—O1x | 107.239 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z−1; (ii) x, y+1, z−1; (iii) y, −x+1, −z+1; (iv) y+1, −x+1, −z+1; (v) −x+1, −y+1, z−1; (vi) −y+1, x, −z+1; (vii) x−1, y, z; (viii) y, −x, −z+1; (ix) −x+1, −y, z; (x) −y, x−1, −z+1; (xi) x, y−1, z; (xii) −x+1, −y+1, z; (xiii) x+1, y, z; (xiv) x, y, z+1; (xv) x, y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | (Ga0.71B0.29)PO4 |
Mr | 147.61 |
Crystal system, space group | Tetragonal, P4 |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, c (Å) | 4.7343 (1), 7.0896 (4) |
V (Å3) | 158.90 (1) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Cu Kα1, Cu Kα2, λ = 1.540500, 1.544300 Å |
Specimen shape, size (mm) | Flat sheet, 10 × 10 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Rigaku-D/max automatic powder diffractometer |
Specimen mounting | Packed powder pellet |
Data collection mode | Reflection |
Scan method | Step |
2θ values (°) | 2θmin = 15.026 2θmax = 100.016 2θstep = 0.01 |
Refinement | |
R factors and goodness of fit | Rp = 0.076, Rwp = 0.129, Rexp = 0.072, R(F2) = 0.07586, χ2 = 3.204 |
No. of parameters | 35 |
No. of restraints | 2 |
Computer programs: PLEASE SUPPLY, GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005).
(Ga/B)1—O2i | 1.7079 (5) | P1—O1 | 1.499 (3) |
(Ga/B)2—O1ii | 1.6979 (5) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z−1; (ii) x−1, y, z. |
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40972035) and State `973' project (No. 2007CB936704).
References
Achary, S. N., Jayakumar, O. D., Tyagi, A. K. & Kulshreshtha, S. K. (2003). J. Solid State Chem. 176, 37–46. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (2005). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Dachille, F. & Glasser, L. S. D. (1959). Acta Cryst. 12, 820–821. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Ewald, B., Huang, Y.-X. & Kniep, R. (2007). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 633, 1517–1540. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Finger, L. W., Cox, D. E. & Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 892–900. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2004). General Structure Analysis System (GSAS). Report LAUR, 86-748. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA. Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. D., Roth, W. L. & Wentorf, R. H. (1959). Acta Cryst. 12, 79. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Mi, J.-X., Mao, S.-Y., Chen, Z.-H., Huang, Z.-L. & Zhao, J.-T. (1999). Chin. Chem. Lett. 10, 707–708. CAS Google Scholar
Moffat, J. B. (1978). Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 18, 199–258. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Moffat, J. B. & Schmidtmeyer, A. (1986). Appl. Catal. 28, 161–168. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mooney, R. C. L. (1956). Acta Cryst. 9, 728–734. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Morey, J., Marinas, J. M. & Sinisterra, J. V. (1983). React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 22, 175–180. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Ewald, B., Prots, Yu., Cardoso-Gil, R., Armbrüster, M., Loa, I., Zhang, L., Huang, Y.-X., Schwarz, U. & Kniep, R. (2004). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 630, 655–662. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Schulze, G. E. R. (1934). Z. Phys. Chem. 24, 215–240. Google Scholar
Stephens, P. W. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 281–289. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tada, A., Suzuka, H. & Imizu, Y. (1987). Chem. Lett. 2, 423–424. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Tartarelli, R., Giorgini, M., Lucchesi, A., Stoppato, G. & Moreli, F. (1970). J. Catal. 17, 41–45. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Thompson, P., Cox, D. E. & Hastings, J. B. (1987). J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 79–83. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The high-cristobalite boron phosphate has long been used as an effective catalyst for various organic reactions such as hydration, dehydration, oligomerization (Moffat, 1978; Moffat & Schmidtmeyer, 1986; Morey et al., 1983; Tada et al., 1987; Tartarelli et al., 1970). The catalytic activities depend on the ratio of P/B and surface area. In the case of excess B content, BPO4 catalysts consist predominately of Lewis acid sites, and show catalytic efficiencies for the dehydration. In contrast, in a region consisting of excess phosphorus P content, BPO4 catalysts have more Brønsted acid sites and exhibit catalytic activities for hydration. Applying trivalent cations to partially substitute boron may vary the ratio of P/B and modify the catalytic property. The possibility of modifying the catalytic properties by varieties of P/B ratio and searching for new phases in the borophosphate system intrigue us to investigate systems containing larger trivalent metal cations. In our previous investigations, a series of compounds with boron partially substituted by transition metals, such as Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu, has been characterized with low cristobalite type structure (Mi et al., 1999). When we applied a smaller trivalent element Ga to modify the BPO4, the occupancy of Ga is more than 50%, while less than 50% for transition metal compounds (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu). In consequence, the structure of (Ga0.71B0.29)PO4 are high-cristobalite structure instead of low-cristobalite type structure.
The crystal structure of (Ga0.71B0.29)PO4 is isostructural with the tetragonal high-cristobalite structure (Schulze, 1934; Schmidt et al., 2004) with space group P4 which is built from alternating (Ga, B)O4 and PO4 tetrahedra interconnected by sharing the common O-vertices, resulting in a three dimensional network with two dimensional 6-membered ring tunnels running along the a- and b-axis, respectively. Every TO4 (T = Ga(B), P) tetrahedron connects to four neighboring TO4 tetrahedra. There are three types of positions for T-atoms. (Ga, B)1 and (Ga, B)2 sit at 1c and 1b, while P at 2g. The long (Schläfli) notation for (Ga, B) nodes is 62.62.62.62.62.62, while 62.62.62.62.62.62 for the P nodes, giving the net symbol (62.62.62.62.62.62)3 which can be represented by the short symbol (66)3.
The (Ga, B)1–O and (Ga, B)2–O bond distances are 1.7079 (5) Å and 1.6979 (5) Å in the (Ga, B)O4 tetrahedra which are significantly larger than the B–O bond value of 1.463 Å in BPO4 (Schmidt et al., 2004), but smaller than the bond values of 1.829 Å for Ga–O bond in GaPO4 (Achary et al., 2003), indicating that boron and gallium occupy the same position. After refining both the atomic occupation number and displacement parameters, it results in the ratio of Ga:B = 0.71:0.29. In turn, the Ga:P is 1.42:2, which is quite good agreement with that (Ga:P = 3:4) in the reactants for obtaining the pure phase. The introduction of gallium in the compound led to the deformation of all the tetrahedra and quite anisotropic expansion of the structure which results in lowering symmetry from space group I4 of BPO4 to P4 for the new compound.