organic compounds
Bis[(4-methylphenyl)ethynyl] telluride
aBioMat-Physics Department, Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, 17033-360 Bauru, SP, Brazil, bDepartment of Chemistry, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 13565-905 São Carlos, SP, Brazil, cDepartamento de Farmácia, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil, and dDepartment of Chemistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
*Correspondence e-mail: ignez@fc.unesp.br
The tellurium atom in the title bis-ethynyl telluride, Te(C9H7)2 or C18H14Te, is located on a crystallographic twofold axis, the C—Te—C angle being 92.23 (15)°. The dihedral angle between the rings is 87.27 (7)°. In the molecules are connected in chains parallel to the b axis and mediated by C—H⋯π interactions.
Related literature
For the synthesis of bis-ethynyl et al. (1992); Engman & Stern (1993). For background to the motivation of studies into tellurium chemistry, see: Petragnani & Stefani (2007); Zukerman-Schpector et al. (2008). For related structures, see: Jones & Ruthe (2006). For searching the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Bruno et al. (2002). For background to Te⋯π interactions, see: Tiekink & Zukerman-Schpector (2009); Zukerman-Schpector & Haiduc (2002).
see: GedridgeExperimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536810006264/hg2646sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810006264/hg2646Isup2.hkl
To a stirred solution of 1-ethynyl-4-methylbenzene (0.35 g, 3.0 mmol) in THF (10 ml), n-BuLi (1.2 ml, 2.5 M, 3.0 mmol) was added dropwise at 195 K. After 20 min., freshly crushed tellurium powder (0.38 g, 3.0 mmol) was added in one lot while a stream of argon was passed through the open flask. The cooling bath was then removed to bring the reaction medium to room temperature. When almost all the tellurium was consumed, the reaction mixture was again cooled to 195 K. Then a solution of bromine (0.48 g, 3.0 mmol) in dry benzene (5 ml) was added dropwise, and stirring was continued for 15 min. The reaction mixture was hydrolyzed at 195 K by addition of water (5 ml). Dilution with water (20 ml) at room temperature, extraction with dichloromethane (2 x 15 ml), drying (MgSO4), and flash
(1/4 dichloromethane/hexane) afforded 0.90 g (62% yield) of the title compound as yellow crystals, m.pt. 400–401 K.The H atoms were geometrically placed (C–H = 0.95–0.98 Å) and refined as riding with Uiso(H) = 1.2-1.5Ueq(C).
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).C18H14Te | F(000) = 696 |
Mr = 357.89 | Dx = 1.680 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Cell parameters from 4746 reflections |
a = 25.8462 (8) Å | θ = 2.2–27.7° |
b = 4.8902 (2) Å | µ = 2.09 mm−1 |
c = 11.3764 (3) Å | T = 100 K |
β = 100.316 (2)° | Block, pale-yellow |
V = 1414.65 (8) Å3 | 0.27 × 0.13 × 0.09 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker SMART APEXII diffractometer | 1443 independent reflections |
Radiation source: sealed tube | 1350 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.020 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 26.5°, θmin = 1.6° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −32→32 |
Tmin = 0.617, Tmax = 0.746 | k = −6→5 |
5433 measured reflections | l = −14→14 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.055 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.20 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.019P)2 + 5.1394P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1443 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
88 parameters | Δρmax = 0.74 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.72 e Å−3 |
C18H14Te | V = 1414.65 (8) Å3 |
Mr = 357.89 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 25.8462 (8) Å | µ = 2.09 mm−1 |
b = 4.8902 (2) Å | T = 100 K |
c = 11.3764 (3) Å | 0.27 × 0.13 × 0.09 mm |
β = 100.316 (2)° |
Bruker SMART APEXII diffractometer | 1443 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 1350 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.617, Tmax = 0.746 | Rint = 0.020 |
5433 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.055 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.20 | Δρmax = 0.74 e Å−3 |
1443 reflections | Δρmin = −0.72 e Å−3 |
88 parameters |
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Te | 0.0000 | 0.37974 (5) | 0.7500 | 0.01504 (9) | |
C1 | 0.04373 (10) | 0.6695 (6) | 0.8528 (2) | 0.0161 (5) | |
C2 | 0.07098 (10) | 0.8358 (6) | 0.9095 (2) | 0.0172 (6) | |
C3 | 0.10551 (10) | 1.0424 (6) | 0.9693 (2) | 0.0155 (5) | |
C4 | 0.14665 (10) | 1.1424 (6) | 0.9162 (2) | 0.0173 (6) | |
H4 | 0.1510 | 1.0759 | 0.8401 | 0.021* | |
C5 | 0.18087 (10) | 1.3374 (6) | 0.9737 (2) | 0.0172 (6) | |
H5 | 0.2086 | 1.4024 | 0.9365 | 0.021* | |
C6 | 0.17559 (10) | 1.4406 (6) | 1.0852 (2) | 0.0154 (6) | |
C7 | 0.13423 (10) | 1.3430 (6) | 1.1371 (2) | 0.0179 (6) | |
H7 | 0.1298 | 1.4119 | 1.2127 | 0.022* | |
C8 | 0.09947 (10) | 1.1478 (6) | 1.0810 (2) | 0.0170 (5) | |
H8 | 0.0715 | 1.0851 | 1.1181 | 0.020* | |
C9 | 0.21318 (10) | 1.6531 (6) | 1.1461 (2) | 0.0189 (6) | |
H9A | 0.1990 | 1.8358 | 1.1248 | 0.028* | |
H9B | 0.2472 | 1.6332 | 1.1202 | 0.028* | |
H9C | 0.2179 | 1.6286 | 1.2329 | 0.028* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Te | 0.01487 (13) | 0.01124 (14) | 0.01834 (14) | 0.000 | 0.00119 (9) | 0.000 |
C1 | 0.0156 (12) | 0.0148 (14) | 0.0177 (12) | 0.0001 (11) | 0.0023 (10) | 0.0042 (11) |
C2 | 0.0154 (12) | 0.0175 (15) | 0.0183 (12) | 0.0040 (11) | 0.0021 (10) | 0.0045 (12) |
C3 | 0.0151 (12) | 0.0123 (14) | 0.0175 (12) | 0.0018 (10) | −0.0013 (10) | 0.0008 (11) |
C4 | 0.0199 (12) | 0.0172 (15) | 0.0152 (12) | 0.0024 (11) | 0.0038 (10) | −0.0026 (12) |
C5 | 0.0179 (12) | 0.0163 (15) | 0.0179 (13) | −0.0021 (11) | 0.0049 (10) | 0.0027 (12) |
C6 | 0.0165 (12) | 0.0116 (14) | 0.0172 (12) | 0.0021 (10) | 0.0002 (10) | 0.0009 (11) |
C7 | 0.0204 (13) | 0.0168 (15) | 0.0168 (12) | 0.0004 (11) | 0.0037 (10) | −0.0020 (12) |
C8 | 0.0180 (12) | 0.0150 (14) | 0.0192 (13) | −0.0016 (11) | 0.0069 (10) | 0.0037 (12) |
C9 | 0.0182 (12) | 0.0177 (15) | 0.0199 (13) | −0.0015 (11) | 0.0006 (10) | 0.0035 (12) |
Te—C1 | 2.044 (3) | C6—C7 | 1.395 (4) |
C1—C2 | 1.188 (4) | C6—C9 | 1.504 (4) |
C2—C3 | 1.437 (4) | C7—C8 | 1.386 (4) |
C3—C4 | 1.402 (4) | C7—H7 | 0.9500 |
C3—C8 | 1.406 (4) | C8—H8 | 0.9500 |
C4—C5 | 1.383 (4) | C9—H9A | 0.9800 |
C4—H4 | 0.9500 | C9—H9B | 0.9800 |
C5—C6 | 1.394 (4) | C9—H9C | 0.9800 |
C5—H5 | 0.9500 | ||
C1—Te—C1i | 92.23 (15) | C7—C6—C9 | 121.5 (2) |
C2—C1—Te | 176.9 (2) | C8—C7—C6 | 121.6 (3) |
C1—C2—C3 | 175.3 (3) | C8—C7—H7 | 119.2 |
C4—C3—C8 | 118.5 (3) | C6—C7—H7 | 119.2 |
C4—C3—C2 | 119.7 (3) | C7—C8—C3 | 120.1 (3) |
C8—C3—C2 | 121.8 (3) | C7—C8—H8 | 120.0 |
C5—C4—C3 | 120.4 (3) | C3—C8—H8 | 120.0 |
C5—C4—H4 | 119.8 | C6—C9—H9A | 109.5 |
C3—C4—H4 | 119.8 | C6—C9—H9B | 109.5 |
C4—C5—C6 | 121.5 (3) | H9A—C9—H9B | 109.5 |
C4—C5—H5 | 119.3 | C6—C9—H9C | 109.5 |
C6—C5—H5 | 119.3 | H9A—C9—H9C | 109.5 |
C5—C6—C7 | 117.9 (3) | H9B—C9—H9C | 109.5 |
C5—C6—C9 | 120.6 (2) | ||
C8—C3—C4—C5 | 1.0 (4) | C5—C6—C7—C8 | 0.5 (4) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | −178.7 (3) | C9—C6—C7—C8 | 179.8 (3) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | −0.2 (4) | C6—C7—C8—C3 | 0.2 (4) |
C4—C5—C6—C7 | −0.6 (4) | C4—C3—C8—C7 | −1.0 (4) |
C4—C5—C6—C9 | −179.9 (3) | C2—C3—C8—C7 | 178.7 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, y, −z+3/2. |
Cg is the centroid of the C3–C8 ring. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C9—H9a···Cgii | 0.98 | 2.62 | 3.573 (3) | 163 |
Symmetry code: (ii) x, y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C18H14Te |
Mr | 357.89 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 100 |
a, b, c (Å) | 25.8462 (8), 4.8902 (2), 11.3764 (3) |
β (°) | 100.316 (2) |
V (Å3) | 1414.65 (8) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 2.09 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.27 × 0.13 × 0.09 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART APEXII diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.617, 0.746 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 5433, 1443, 1350 |
Rint | 0.020 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.628 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.019, 0.055, 1.20 |
No. of reflections | 1443 |
No. of parameters | 88 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.74, −0.72 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007), SAINT (Bruker, 2007), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Cg is the centroid of the C3–C8 ring. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C9—H9a···Cgi | 0.98 | 2.62 | 3.573 (3) | 163 |
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z. |
Acknowledgements
We thank FAPESP (07/59404–2 to HAS), CNPq (472237/2008–0 to IC, 300613/2007 to HAS, and 306532/2009–3 to JZ-S) and CAPES (808/2009 to JZ-S and IC) for financial support.
References
Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruker (2007). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389–397. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Engman, L. & Stern, D. (1993). Organometallics, 12, 1445–1448. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gedridge, R. W. Jr, Brandsma, L., Nissan, R. A., Verkruijsse, H. D., Harder, S., de Jong, R. L. P. & O'Connor, C. J. (1992). Organometallics, 11, 418–422. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Jones, P. G. & Ruthe, F. (2006). Private communication (refcode: CEPSUM). CCDC, Cambridge, England. Google Scholar
Petragnani, N. & Stefani, H. A. (2007). Tellurium in Organic Synthesis - Second, Updated and Enlarged Edition. 2nd ed. Netherlands: Academic Press/Elsevier. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tiekink, E. R. T. & Zukerman-Schpector, J. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 2701–2711. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zukerman-Schpector, J. & Haiduc, I. (2002). CrystEngComm, 4, 178–192. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zukerman-Schpector, J., Stefani, H. A., Guadagnin, R. C., Suganuma, C. A. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2008). Z. Kristallogr. 223, 536–541. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Carbon–carbon bond formation for the preparation of symmetrical and unsymmetrical 1,3-diyne compounds is one of the most useful and important tools in modern organic chemistry. The construction of 1,3-diynes can be achieved either by intermolecular or intramolecular coupling of two similar or dissimilar alkynylic functionalities in the presence of organometallic complexes. However, the synthesis and use of bis-ethynyl tellurides are scarcely described in the literature (Gedridge et al., 1992, Engman & Stern, 1993) and their use in the detelluration reaction to afford 1,3-diynes is unknown until now. As part of our ongoing research into tellurium chemistry (Petragnani & Stefani, 2007; Zukerman-Schpector et al., 2008), the title compound, (I), was synthesized and its crystal structure determined.
The C—Te—C in (I), Fig. 1, angle of 92.23 (15) ° is close to the smallest value found for related diorganotellurium compounds, i.e. 92.30 (14) ° for Te[C(H)═C(H)Ph]2 (Jones & Ruthe, 2006). A search in the CSD (Bruno et al. 2002) showed 225 hits for related compounds and a mean value of 96.0 ° for the C—Te(II)—C angle.
The molecules are linked in chains parallel to the b axis mediated in a large part through C–H···π interactions, Table 1 and Fig. 1. Short intermolecular Te–C interactions [e.g. Te···C2ii = 3.541 (3) Å for ii: x, -1+ y, z], indicative of Te···π interactions (Zukerman-Schpector & Haiduc, 2002; Tiekink & Zukerman-Schpector, 2009), are also noted as contributing to the stability of the chain.