{6-[(2-Anilinoeth­yl)imino­meth­yl]-2-eth­oxyphenolato}(thio­cyanato-κN)­copper(II)

Wang, C.-Y.; Li, J.-F.; Cao, F.

doi:10.1107/S1600536810010305

metal-organic compounds

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 66| Part 4| April 2010| Pages m445-m446

doi:10.1107/S1600536810010305

Open

access

{6-[(2-Anilinoethyl)iminomethyl]-2-ethoxyphenolato}(thiocyanato-κN)copper(II)

Chen-Yi Wang,^a ^* Jing-Fen Li ^a and Feng Cao ^a

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, People's Republic of China
^*Correspondence e-mail: chenyi_wang@163.com

(Received 18 March 2010; accepted 18 March 2010; online 24 March 2010)

In the title complex, [Cu(C₁₇H₁₉N₂O₂)(NCS)], the Cu^II atom is chelated by the phenolate O atom, the imine N atom and the amine N atom of the N,N′,O-tridentate 2-ethoxy-6-[(2-anilinoethyl)iminomethyl]phenolate ligand, and by the N atom of a thiocyanate anion, forming a distorted CuON₃ square-planar geometry. The dihedral angle between the aromatic rings of the ligand is 67.9 (4)°. In the crystal, inversion dimers linked by pairs of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds occur, generating R₂²(8) loops.

Related literature

For background to the structures and properties of copper complexes, see: Collinson & Fenton (1996 ); Hossain et al. (1996 ); Tarafder et al. (2002 ); Musie et al. (2003 ); García-Raso et al. (2003 ); Reddy et al. (2000 ); Ray et al. (2003 ); Arnold et al. (2003 ); Raptopoulou et al. (1998 ). For related structures, see: Wang et al. (2009a ,b ); Wang (2009 ); Hebbachi & Benali-Cherif (2005 ); Butcher et al. (2003 ); Elmali et al. (2000 ); Warda et al. (1997 ).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cu(C₁₇H₁₉N₂O₂)(NCS)]
M_r = 404.96
Orthorhombic, P b c n
a = 13.6786 (5) Å
b = 10.4938 (4) Å
c = 25.2618 (10) Å
V = 3626.1 (2) Å³
Z = 8
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 1.34 mm⁻¹
T = 298 K
0.30 × 0.27 × 0.27 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ) T_min = 0.690, T_max = 0.714
19741 measured reflections
3746 independent reflections
2041 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R_int = 0.069

Refinement

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.055
wR(F²) = 0.182
S = 1.03
3746 reflections
229 parameters
13 restraints
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max = 1.25 e Å⁻³
Δρ_min = −0.64 e Å⁻³

Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å)

Cu1—O1	1.914 (3)
Cu1—N1	1.926 (4)
Cu1—N3	1.941 (4)
Cu1—N2	2.076 (4)

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O1ⁱ	0.90 (1)	2.07 (3)	2.920 (6)	157 (5)
Symmetry code: (i) -x+2, -y, -z+1.

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998 ); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810010305/hb5365sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810010305/hb5365Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report

Comment top

Copper(II) complexes have been received much attention for their versatile biological activities and interesting structures (Collinson & Fenton, 1996; Hossain et al., 1996; Tarafder et al., 2002; Musie et al., 2003; García-Raso et al., 2003). Considerable effort has been made to construct a variety of copper(II) complexes in an attempt to model the physical and chemical behaviour of copper-containing enzymes (Reddy et al., 2000). The peculiarity of copper lies in its ability to form complexes with coordination number four, five, and six (Ray et al., 2003; Arnold et al., 2003; Raptopoulou et al., 1998).

As part of our onging investigations into urease inhibitors (Wang et al., 2009a,b; Wang, 2009), we have synthesized the title compound, (I), a new Cu^II complex, and its crystal structure is reported here. The Cu^II atom in the complex is chelated by the phenolate O atom, imine N atom, and the amine N atom of 2-ethoxy-6-[(2-phenylaminoethylimino)methyl]phenolate, and by the N atom of a thiocyanate ligand, giving a square planar geometry (Fig. 1). The coordinate bond lengths and angles (Table 1) are typical and are comparable with those observed in other related copper(II) complexes (Hebbachi & Benali-Cherif, 2005; Butcher et al., 2003; Elmali et al., 2000; Warda et al., 1997).

Related literature top

For background to the structures and properties of copper complexes, see: Collinson & Fenton (1996); Hossain et al. (1996); Tarafder et al. (2002); Musie et al. (2003); García-Raso et al. (2003); Reddy et al. (2000); Ray et al. (2003); Arnold et al. (2003); Raptopoulou et al. (1998). For related structures, see: Wang et al. (2009a,b); Wang (2009); Hebbachi & Benali-Cherif (2005); Butcher et al. (2003); Elmali et al. (2000); Warda et al. (1997).

Experimental top

3-Ethoxysalicylaldehyde (1.0 mmol, 166 mg), N-phenyl-1,2-diaminoethane (1.0 mmol, 136 mg), ammonium thiocyanate (1.0 mmol, 76 mg), and Cu(CH₃COO)₂.H₂O (1.0 mmol, 200 mg) were dissolved in methanol (80 ml). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for about 1 h to give a blue solution. After keeping the solution in air for a few days, blue blocks of (I) were formed.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008.

Figures top

Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), showing displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.

{6-[(2-Anilinoethyl)iminomethyl]-2-ethoxyphenolato}(thiocyanato- κN)copper(II) top

Crystal data top

[Cu(C₁₇H₁₉N₂O₂)(NCS)]	F(000) = 1672
M_r = 404.96	D_x = 1.484 Mg m⁻³
Orthorhombic, Pbcn	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2n 2ab	Cell parameters from 2506 reflections
a = 13.6786 (5) Å	θ = 2.4–24.9°
b = 10.4938 (4) Å	µ = 1.34 mm⁻¹
c = 25.2618 (10) Å	T = 298 K
V = 3626.1 (2) Å³	Block, blue
Z = 8	0.30 × 0.27 × 0.27 mm

Data collection top

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer	3746 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	2041 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.069
ω scan	θ_max = 26.5°, θ_min = 1.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)	h = −17→16
T_min = 0.690, T_max = 0.714	k = −13→12
19741 measured reflections	l = −26→31

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.055	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F²) = 0.182	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0843P)² + 3.6378P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
3746 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max = 0.001
229 parameters	Δρ_max = 1.25 e Å⁻³
13 restraints	Δρ_min = −0.64 e Å⁻³

Crystal data top

[Cu(C₁₇H₁₉N₂O₂)(NCS)]	V = 3626.1 (2) Å³
M_r = 404.96	Z = 8
Orthorhombic, Pbcn	Mo Kα radiation
a = 13.6786 (5) Å	µ = 1.34 mm⁻¹
b = 10.4938 (4) Å	T = 298 K
c = 25.2618 (10) Å	0.30 × 0.27 × 0.27 mm

Data collection top

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer	3746 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)	2041 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
T_min = 0.690, T_max = 0.714	R_int = 0.069
19741 measured reflections

Refinement top

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.055	13 restraints
wR(F²) = 0.182	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03	Δρ_max = 1.25 e Å⁻³
3746 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.64 e Å⁻³
229 parameters

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > σ(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Cu1	0.88473 (4)	0.07765 (5)	0.49939 (2)	0.0424 (2)
O1	0.9189 (3)	0.0617 (3)	0.57256 (13)	0.0498 (9)
O2	0.9226 (4)	−0.0030 (7)	0.67464 (19)	0.0976 (17)
S1	0.82168 (12)	−0.35452 (14)	0.52360 (11)	0.1050 (8)
N1	0.9061 (3)	0.2590 (4)	0.50007 (17)	0.0454 (10)
N2	0.9049 (3)	0.0938 (4)	0.41821 (16)	0.0468 (10)
N3	0.8557 (4)	−0.1032 (4)	0.49588 (17)	0.0568 (12)
C1	0.9081 (4)	0.2849 (6)	0.5943 (2)	0.0625 (15)
C2	0.9123 (4)	0.1538 (6)	0.6078 (2)	0.0528 (14)
C3	0.9115 (5)	0.1206 (8)	0.6623 (2)	0.0731 (18)
C4	0.9057 (6)	0.2158 (12)	0.7003 (3)	0.108 (3)
H4	0.9043	0.1930	0.7358	0.130*
C5	0.9020 (7)	0.3417 (12)	0.6870 (4)	0.123 (4)
H5	0.8990	0.4034	0.7134	0.148*
C6	0.9027 (5)	0.3772 (8)	0.6348 (4)	0.094 (3)
H6	0.8995	0.4631	0.6260	0.113*
C7	0.9110 (4)	0.3275 (5)	0.5412 (3)	0.0585 (15)
H7	0.9172	0.4149	0.5360	0.070*
C8	0.9046 (4)	0.3177 (5)	0.4472 (2)	0.0597 (16)
H8A	0.9436	0.3948	0.4471	0.072*
H8B	0.8382	0.3397	0.4374	0.072*
C9	0.9458 (4)	0.2233 (5)	0.4086 (2)	0.0567 (14)
H9A	0.9303	0.2500	0.3728	0.068*
H9B	1.0163	0.2207	0.4121	0.068*
C10	0.8236 (4)	0.0581 (6)	0.3843 (2)	0.0529 (14)
C11	0.7402 (5)	0.1237 (8)	0.3838 (3)	0.110 (3)
H11	0.7344	0.1955	0.4052	0.132*
C12	0.6615 (6)	0.0878 (10)	0.3522 (5)	0.124 (3)
H12	0.6035	0.1339	0.3538	0.149*
C13	0.6683 (6)	−0.0091 (11)	0.3208 (3)	0.092 (3)
H13	0.6174	−0.0291	0.2978	0.110*
C14	0.7499 (7)	−0.0807 (10)	0.3217 (3)	0.117 (3)
H14	0.7538	−0.1532	0.3006	0.141*
C15	0.8299 (6)	−0.0466 (9)	0.3544 (3)	0.105 (3)
H15	0.8861	−0.0964	0.3551	0.126*
C16	0.8566 (12)	−0.0681 (15)	0.6821 (7)	0.215 (7)
H16A	0.8254	−0.0841	0.6483	0.258*
H16B	0.8102	−0.0210	0.7036	0.258*
C17	0.8735 (8)	−0.1978 (12)	0.7090 (4)	0.154 (4)
H17A	0.8550	−0.2650	0.6853	0.232*
H17B	0.8348	−0.2029	0.7406	0.232*
H17C	0.9414	−0.2065	0.7180	0.232*
C18	0.8418 (4)	−0.2070 (5)	0.5072 (2)	0.0523 (13)
H2	0.952 (3)	0.035 (4)	0.413 (2)	0.080*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Cu1	0.0542 (4)	0.0294 (3)	0.0437 (4)	−0.0002 (2)	−0.0047 (3)	0.0060 (3)
O1	0.058 (2)	0.048 (2)	0.0435 (19)	0.0116 (17)	−0.0025 (16)	0.0050 (16)
O2	0.076 (3)	0.147 (5)	0.069 (3)	0.005 (4)	0.018 (3)	0.042 (3)
S1	0.0524 (9)	0.0341 (8)	0.228 (2)	−0.0038 (7)	−0.0174 (12)	0.0304 (11)
N1	0.042 (2)	0.033 (2)	0.061 (3)	0.0013 (16)	0.000 (2)	0.006 (2)
N2	0.047 (3)	0.051 (3)	0.042 (2)	0.003 (2)	−0.0037 (19)	0.006 (2)
N3	0.074 (3)	0.034 (2)	0.063 (3)	−0.002 (2)	−0.006 (2)	0.004 (2)
C1	0.053 (4)	0.065 (4)	0.069 (4)	0.000 (3)	0.006 (3)	−0.018 (3)
C2	0.047 (3)	0.065 (4)	0.047 (3)	0.001 (3)	0.002 (2)	−0.005 (3)
C3	0.063 (4)	0.102 (5)	0.054 (4)	0.001 (4)	0.004 (3)	0.006 (4)
C4	0.087 (6)	0.182 (10)	0.056 (4)	−0.012 (7)	0.016 (4)	−0.040 (6)
C5	0.115 (8)	0.140 (9)	0.115 (8)	−0.022 (7)	0.028 (6)	−0.067 (8)
C6	0.092 (6)	0.083 (5)	0.106 (6)	−0.011 (4)	0.028 (5)	−0.049 (5)
C7	0.054 (3)	0.036 (3)	0.086 (5)	0.003 (2)	0.005 (3)	−0.007 (3)
C8	0.058 (4)	0.043 (3)	0.078 (4)	0.001 (3)	0.004 (3)	0.028 (3)
C9	0.045 (3)	0.064 (4)	0.061 (3)	0.000 (3)	0.003 (3)	0.022 (3)
C10	0.045 (3)	0.072 (4)	0.042 (3)	−0.003 (3)	−0.003 (2)	0.012 (3)
C11	0.062 (5)	0.122 (7)	0.146 (7)	0.022 (5)	−0.032 (5)	−0.036 (6)
C12	0.068 (6)	0.140 (9)	0.164 (9)	0.010 (5)	−0.048 (6)	−0.012 (7)
C13	0.068 (5)	0.152 (8)	0.056 (4)	−0.039 (6)	−0.019 (4)	0.032 (5)
C14	0.092 (6)	0.166 (9)	0.095 (6)	−0.021 (6)	−0.019 (5)	−0.057 (6)
C15	0.067 (5)	0.140 (8)	0.108 (6)	0.007 (5)	−0.015 (4)	−0.053 (6)
C16	0.199 (10)	0.184 (10)	0.261 (11)	0.002 (8)	0.075 (8)	−0.001 (8)
C17	0.148 (7)	0.157 (8)	0.158 (7)	−0.017 (6)	0.054 (6)	0.036 (6)
C18	0.046 (3)	0.034 (3)	0.077 (4)	0.001 (2)	−0.007 (3)	0.004 (3)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Cu1—O1	1.914 (3)	C7—H7	0.9300
Cu1—N1	1.926 (4)	C8—C9	1.499 (8)
Cu1—N3	1.941 (4)	C8—H8A	0.9700
Cu1—N2	2.076 (4)	C8—H8B	0.9700
O1—C2	1.316 (6)	C9—H9A	0.9700
O2—C16	1.148 (15)	C9—H9B	0.9700
O2—C3	1.342 (9)	C10—C11	1.332 (9)
S1—C18	1.627 (5)	C10—C15	1.336 (9)
N1—C7	1.265 (7)	C11—C12	1.392 (11)
N1—C8	1.470 (6)	C11—H11	0.9300
N2—C10	1.452 (7)	C12—C13	1.294 (12)
N2—C9	1.489 (7)	C12—H12	0.9300
N2—H2	0.901 (10)	C13—C14	1.346 (12)
N3—C18	1.142 (7)	C13—H13	0.9300
C1—C6	1.411 (9)	C14—C15	1.419 (10)
C1—C7	1.414 (8)	C14—H14	0.9300
C1—C2	1.419 (8)	C15—H15	0.9300
C2—C3	1.420 (8)	C16—C17	1.538 (17)
C3—C4	1.388 (11)	C16—H16A	0.9700
C4—C5	1.364 (13)	C16—H16B	0.9700
C4—H4	0.9300	C17—H17A	0.9600
C5—C6	1.371 (13)	C17—H17B	0.9600
C5—H5	0.9300	C17—H17C	0.9600
C6—H6	0.9300

O1—Cu1—N1	92.33 (17)	C9—C8—H8A	110.1
O1—Cu1—N3	90.50 (16)	N1—C8—H8B	110.1
N1—Cu1—N3	176.25 (19)	C9—C8—H8B	110.1
O1—Cu1—N2	158.24 (17)	H8A—C8—H8B	108.4
N1—Cu1—N2	84.73 (18)	N2—C9—C8	110.9 (4)
N3—Cu1—N2	93.54 (17)	N2—C9—H9A	109.5
C2—O1—Cu1	124.9 (3)	C8—C9—H9A	109.5
C16—O2—C3	121.6 (10)	N2—C9—H9B	109.5
C7—N1—C8	120.6 (5)	C8—C9—H9B	109.5
C7—N1—Cu1	125.2 (4)	H9A—C9—H9B	108.1
C8—N1—Cu1	113.8 (3)	C11—C10—C15	118.3 (6)
C10—N2—C9	115.3 (4)	C11—C10—N2	121.9 (6)
C10—N2—Cu1	117.4 (3)	C15—C10—N2	119.7 (6)
C9—N2—Cu1	106.5 (3)	C10—C11—C12	121.9 (8)
C10—N2—H2	107 (4)	C10—C11—H11	119.0
C9—N2—H2	109 (4)	C12—C11—H11	119.0
Cu1—N2—H2	100 (4)	C13—C12—C11	120.6 (9)
C18—N3—Cu1	162.8 (5)	C13—C12—H12	119.7
C6—C1—C7	118.2 (7)	C11—C12—H12	119.7
C6—C1—C2	119.6 (7)	C12—C13—C14	119.2 (7)
C7—C1—C2	122.2 (5)	C12—C13—H13	120.4
O1—C2—C1	123.5 (5)	C14—C13—H13	120.4
O1—C2—C3	118.4 (6)	C13—C14—C15	120.6 (8)
C1—C2—C3	118.1 (6)	C13—C14—H14	119.7
O2—C3—C4	122.7 (7)	C15—C14—H14	119.7
O2—C3—C2	117.5 (6)	C10—C15—C14	119.2 (8)
C4—C3—C2	119.6 (8)	C10—C15—H15	120.4
C5—C4—C3	122.0 (9)	C14—C15—H15	120.4
C5—C4—H4	119.0	O2—C16—C17	118.8 (15)
C3—C4—H4	119.0	O2—C16—H16A	107.6
C4—C5—C6	119.9 (9)	C17—C16—H16A	107.6
C4—C5—H5	120.0	O2—C16—H16B	107.6
C6—C5—H5	120.0	C17—C16—H16B	107.6
C5—C6—C1	120.8 (9)	H16A—C16—H16B	107.1
C5—C6—H6	119.6	C16—C17—H17A	109.5
C1—C6—H6	119.6	C16—C17—H17B	109.5
N1—C7—C1	126.7 (5)	H17A—C17—H17B	109.5
N1—C7—H7	116.7	C16—C17—H17C	109.5
C1—C7—H7	116.7	H17A—C17—H17C	109.5
N1—C8—C9	108.0 (4)	H17B—C17—H17C	109.5
N1—C8—H8A	110.1	N3—C18—S1	179.6 (6)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N2—H2···O1ⁱ	0.90 (1)	2.07 (3)	2.920 (6)	157 (5)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y, −z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	[Cu(C₁₇H₁₉N₂O₂)(NCS)]
M_r	404.96
Crystal system, space group	Orthorhombic, Pbcn
Temperature (K)	298
a, b, c (Å)	13.6786 (5), 10.4938 (4), 25.2618 (10)
V (Å³)	3626.1 (2)
Z	8
Radiation type	Mo Kα
µ (mm⁻¹)	1.34
Crystal size (mm)	0.30 × 0.27 × 0.27

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
T_min, T_max	0.690, 0.714
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	19741, 3746, 2041
R_int	0.069
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.627

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.055, 0.182, 1.03
No. of reflections	3746
No. of parameters	229
No. of restraints	13
H-atom treatment	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	1.25, −0.64

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 1998), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008.

Selected bond lengths (Å) top

Cu1—O1	1.914 (3)	Cu1—N3	1.941 (4)
Cu1—N1	1.926 (4)	Cu1—N2	2.076 (4)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N2—H2···O1ⁱ	0.901 (10)	2.07 (3)	2.920 (6)	157 (5)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y, −z+1.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 30771696), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant No. Y407318) and the Science and Technology Plan of Huzhou (grant No. 2009 GG06).

References

Arnold, P. J., Davies, S. C., Durrant, M. C., Griffiths, D. V., Hughes, D. L. & Sharpe, P. C. (2003). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 348, 143–149. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bruker (1998). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Butcher, R. J., Mockler, G. M. & McKern, O. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, m1104–m1106. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Collinson, S. R. & Fenton, D. E. (1996). Coord. Chem. Rev. 148, 19–40. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Elmali, A., Zeyrek, C. T., Elerman, Y. & Svoboda, I. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 1302–1304. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
García-Raso, Á., Fiol, J. J., López-Zafra, A., Castro, J. A., Cabrero, A., Mata, I. & Molins, E. (2003). Polyhedron, 22, 403–409. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Hebbachi, R. & Benali-Cherif, N. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, m1188–m1190. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hossain, M. E., Alam, M. N., Begum, J., Ali, M. A., Nazimuddin, M., Smith, F. E. & Hynes, R. C. (1996). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 249, 207–213. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Musie, G. T., Li, X. & Powell, D. R. (2003). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 348, 69–74. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Raptopoulou, C. P., Papadopoulos, A. N., Malamatari, D. A., Ioannidis, E., Moisidis, G., Terzis, A. & Kessissoglou, D. P. (1998). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 272, 283–290. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ray, M. S., Bhattacharya, R. B., Chaudhuri, S., Righi, L., Bocelli, G., Mukhopadhyay, G. & Ghosh, A. (2003). Polyhedron 22, 617–624. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Reddy, P. A. N., Datta, R. & Chakravarty, A. R. (2000). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 3, 322–324. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tarafder, M. T. H., Jin, K. T., Crouse, K. A., Ali, A. M., Yamin, B. M. & Fun, H.-K. (2002). Polyhedron, 21, 2547–2554. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y. (2009). J. Coord. Chem. 62, 2860–2868. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y., Wu, X., Tu, S.-J. & Jiang, B. (2009a). Synth. React. Inorg. Met. Org. Nano Met. Chem. 39, 78–82. CAS Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y., Ye, J.-Y., Lv, C.-Y., Lan, W.-Z. & Zhou, J.-B. (2009b). J. Coord. Chem. 62, 2164–2171. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Warda, S. A., Friebel, C., Sivý, J., Plesch, G. & Bláhová, M. (1997). Acta Cryst. C53, 50–54. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 66| Part 4| April 2010| Pages m445-m446

doi:10.1107/S1600536810010305

Open

access

Format		BIBTeX
		EndNote
		RefMan
		Refer
		Medline
		CIF
		SGML
		Plain Text

Format		BIBTeX
		EndNote
		RefMan
		Refer
		Medline
		CIF
		SGML
		Plain Text

Search IUCr Journals		doi		Advanced search
Author		volume	page

metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

{6-[(2-Anilinoeth­yl)imino­meth­yl]-2-eth­oxyphenolato}(thio­cyanato-κN)­copper(II)

Related literature

Experimental

Crystal data

Data collection

Refinement

Supporting information

Acknowledgements

References

metal-organic compounds

{6-[(2-Anilinoethyl)iminomethyl]-2-ethoxyphenolato}(thiocyanato-κN)copper(II)