Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 66| Part 5| May 2010| Page o1118
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810013565

(R)-1-Phenyl­ethyl­ammonium tri­fluoro­acetate

María-Guadalupe Hernández Linares,a Gabriel Guerrero Lunaa and Sylvain Bernèsb*

aEscuela de Ingeniería Química, Universidad del Istmo, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 70760 Sto. Domingo Tehuantepec, Oax., Mexico, and bDEP Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, UANL, Guerrero y Progreso S/N, Col. Treviño, 64570 Monterrey, NL, Mexico
*Correspondence e-mail: sylvain_bernes@Hotmail.com

(Received 10 March 2010; accepted 13 April 2010; online 21 April 2010)

In the crystal structure of the title salt, C8H12N+·C2F3O2−, all of the ammonium H atoms serve as donors for hydrogen bonds to carboxyl­ate O atoms, forming an R43(10) ring motif based on two cations and two anions. Since both cations and anions act as inter-ion bridging groups, R(10) rings aggregate in a one-dimensional supra­molecular network by sharing the strongest N—H⋯O bond. Edge-sharing motifs lie on the twofold screw axis parallel to [010], and anti­parallel packing of these 21-column structural units results in the crystal structure. This arrangement is one of the most commonly occurring in conglomerates of chiral 1-phenyl­ethyl­amine with achiral monocarboxylic acids, confirming that these ionic salts are particularly robust supra­molecular heterosynthons useful in crystal engineering.

Related literature

For graph-set analysis, see: Etter (1990[Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120-126.]); Bernstein et al. (1995[Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555-1573.]). For characteristic structural patterns found in crystal salts of 1-phenyl­ethyl­amine and monocarboxylic acids, see: Kinbara, Hashimoto et al. (1996[Kinbara, K., Hashimoto, Y., Sukegawa, M., Nohira, H. & Saigo, K. (1996). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 3441-3449.]); Kinbara, Kai et al. (1996[Kinbara, K., Kai, A., Maekawa, Y., Hashimoto, Y., Naruse, S., Hasegawa, M. & Saigo, K. (1996). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans 2, pp. 247-253.]); Lemmerer et al. (2008[Lemmerer, A., Bourne, S. A. & Fernandes, M. A. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 1106-1109.]). For related chiral salt structures, see: Johansen et al. (1998[Johansen, T. N., Ebert, B., Bräuner-Osborne, H., Didriksen, M., Christensen, I. T., Søby, K. K., Madsen, U., Krogsgaard-Larsen, P. & Brehm, L. (1998). J. Med. Chem. 41, 930-939.]); Boussac et al. (2002[Boussac, H., Crassous, J., Dutasta, J.-P., Grosvalet, L. & Thozet, A. (2002). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 13, 975-981.]); Lemmerer et al. (2008[Lemmerer, A., Bourne, S. A. & Fernandes, M. A. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 1106-1109.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C8H12N+·C2F3O2−

  • Mr = 235.21

  • Orthorhombic, P 21 21 21

  • a = 6.7821 (5) Å

  • b = 6.9887 (8) Å

  • c = 24.378 (2) Å

  • V = 1155.49 (19) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.13 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.60 × 0.44 × 0.40 mm
Data collection

  • Siemens P4 diffractometer

  • 3079 measured reflections

  • 1808 independent reflections

  • 1288 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.020

  • 3 standard reflections every 97 reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041

  • wR(F2) = 0.112

  • S = 1.03

  • 1808 reflections

  • 156 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.13 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1 0.90 (3) 1.92 (3) 2.812 (3) 171 (3)
N1—H1B⋯O2i 0.92 (3) 1.97 (3) 2.818 (3) 154 (3)
N1—H1C⋯O2ii 0.90 (3) 1.92 (3) 2.816 (2) 175 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y-1, z; (ii) [-x+2, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996[Siemens (1996). XSCANS. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996[Siemens (1996). XSCANS. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL-Plus; molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008[Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466-470.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL-Plus.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810013565/pb2025sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810013565/pb2025Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report


Comment top

In their works about optical resolution of conglomerates, Kinbara et al. noted that characteristic hydrogen-bond networks were formed in the salt crystals of 1-phenylethylamine and 1-(4-isopropylphenyl)ethylamine with cinnamic acid (Kinbara, Kai et al., 1996). They suggested that "the pattern of hydrogen bonds plays a significant role in the formation of conglomerates" (Kinbara, Hashimoto et al., 1996). In the specific case of salts of chiral 1-phenylethylamine with achiral monocarboxylic acids, a number of structural determinations indeed showed that two predominant supramolecular arrangements are favored by the charge assisted N—H···O hydrogen bonds, which result in crystals belonging to P21 or P212121 space groups (Lemmerer et al., 2008): cations and anions associate through quite strong hydrogen bonds to form C21(4)C22(6)[R43(10)] motifs (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995). This basic unit has hydrogen bonds with translational units, forming an infinite columnar structure, which generates a screw axis in the crystal structure (invariably a 21 axis). This supramolecular structure, referred as '21–column' in the Kinbara's reports, may be arranged in a parallel packing in the crystal, which then belongs to P21 space group, or in an antiparallel fashion, generating P212121 crystals.

The chiral title salt (Fig. 1) clearly falls in the latter category. Both the cation and anion are placed in general positions in an orthorhombic unit cell. All ammonium H atoms form hydrogen bonds with carboxylate O atoms, giving a ring motif R43(10), as shown in Fig. 2. The strongest hydrogen bond, N1—H1C···O2ii is common to two rings motifs. The repetition of the motif in the [010] direction generates homochiral (R)–21–columns. This 1D supramolecular network includes larger ring motifs, which appear if shared contacts are omitted. The sequence of sub-rings nest is R43(10) → R65(16) → R87(22) → R109(28) → ··· → R2n2n-1(6n-2) [with n > 1]. The shortest contact between neighboring 21–columns is N1—H1B···F2i, which should be regarded as a van der Waals contact rather than as an actual hydrogen bond. As a consequence, an antiparallel arrangement of 21–columns is favored (Fig. 2, inset), which is, in turn, reflected in the P212121 space group. Such crystal structures were obtained for numerous 1-phenylethylamine salts including different anions, e.g. bromofluoroacetate (Boussac et al., 2002), m-iodobenzoate (Lemmerer et al., 2008) or more complex, bulky carboxylate derivatives (Johansen et al., 1998).

The above description is thus in line with expectations from previous reported structures, and confirms that salts based on chiral 1-phenylethylamine and achiral monocarboxylic acids are robust heterosynthons, useful for crystal engineering and crystal structure prediction. The feature should however not been transferred to other salts (or worse, to cocrystals) of 1-phenylethylamine, which stabilize different supramolecular motifs, if any.

Related literature top

For graph-set analysis, see: Etter (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995). For characteristic structural patterns found in crystal salts of 1-phenylethylamine and monocarboxylic acids, see: Kinbara, Hashimoto et al. (1996); Kinbara, Kai et al. (1996); Lemmerer et al. (2008). For related chiral salt structures, see: Johansen et al. (1998); Boussac et al. (2002); Lemmerer et al. (2008).

Experimental top

The title salt crystallized when attempting to synthesize a diimine organic ligand. A mixture of (S)-6-acetyloxy-5-methyl-2,3-hexanedione (1 g, 5.37 mmol) and Na2SO4 (4 g) in chloroform (10 ml) was stirred for 5 min. A catalytic amount of trifluoroacetic acid and 2 equiv. of (R)-(+)-α-phenylethylamine (10.6 mmol) were added and the mixture was refluxed (ca. 353 K) under inert atmosphere, until starting materials were not detected by TLC (ca. 2 h). After evaporation under reduced pressure, the crude was recrystallized from CH2Cl2 at 298 K, affording, among other products, the title salt.

Refinement top

As no heavy atoms are present in the crystal and data were measured at room-temperature using Mo Kα radiation, no absorption correction was applied to the raw data. Because of insufficient anomalous scattering effects, the Flack parameter could not be reliably determined, and measured Friedel pairs (796) were merged. Absolute configuration was assigned by reference to the chiral amine used as starting material, assuming that no inversion occurred during crystallization. Ammonium H atoms were refined with free coordinates, in order to get accurate dimensions for hydrogen bonds. Other H atoms were placed in idealized positions and refined as riding to their carrier atoms, with bond lengths fixed to 0.93 (aromatic CH), 0.96 (methyl CH3) or 0.98 Å (methine CH). Isotropic displacement parameters for H atoms were calculated as Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) for aromatic CH groups and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C, N) for other groups. The methyl group was considered as a rigid group free to rotate about its C—C bond.

Structure description top

In their works about optical resolution of conglomerates, Kinbara et al. noted that characteristic hydrogen-bond networks were formed in the salt crystals of 1-phenylethylamine and 1-(4-isopropylphenyl)ethylamine with cinnamic acid (Kinbara, Kai et al., 1996). They suggested that "the pattern of hydrogen bonds plays a significant role in the formation of conglomerates" (Kinbara, Hashimoto et al., 1996). In the specific case of salts of chiral 1-phenylethylamine with achiral monocarboxylic acids, a number of structural determinations indeed showed that two predominant supramolecular arrangements are favored by the charge assisted N—H···O hydrogen bonds, which result in crystals belonging to P21 or P212121 space groups (Lemmerer et al., 2008): cations and anions associate through quite strong hydrogen bonds to form C21(4)C22(6)[R43(10)] motifs (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995). This basic unit has hydrogen bonds with translational units, forming an infinite columnar structure, which generates a screw axis in the crystal structure (invariably a 21 axis). This supramolecular structure, referred as '21–column' in the Kinbara's reports, may be arranged in a parallel packing in the crystal, which then belongs to P21 space group, or in an antiparallel fashion, generating P212121 crystals.

The chiral title salt (Fig. 1) clearly falls in the latter category. Both the cation and anion are placed in general positions in an orthorhombic unit cell. All ammonium H atoms form hydrogen bonds with carboxylate O atoms, giving a ring motif R43(10), as shown in Fig. 2. The strongest hydrogen bond, N1—H1C···O2ii is common to two rings motifs. The repetition of the motif in the [010] direction generates homochiral (R)–21–columns. This 1D supramolecular network includes larger ring motifs, which appear if shared contacts are omitted. The sequence of sub-rings nest is R43(10) → R65(16) → R87(22) → R109(28) → ··· → R2n2n-1(6n-2) [with n > 1]. The shortest contact between neighboring 21–columns is N1—H1B···F2i, which should be regarded as a van der Waals contact rather than as an actual hydrogen bond. As a consequence, an antiparallel arrangement of 21–columns is favored (Fig. 2, inset), which is, in turn, reflected in the P212121 space group. Such crystal structures were obtained for numerous 1-phenylethylamine salts including different anions, e.g. bromofluoroacetate (Boussac et al., 2002), m-iodobenzoate (Lemmerer et al., 2008) or more complex, bulky carboxylate derivatives (Johansen et al., 1998).

The above description is thus in line with expectations from previous reported structures, and confirms that salts based on chiral 1-phenylethylamine and achiral monocarboxylic acids are robust heterosynthons, useful for crystal engineering and crystal structure prediction. The feature should however not been transferred to other salts (or worse, to cocrystals) of 1-phenylethylamine, which stabilize different supramolecular motifs, if any.

For graph-set analysis, see: Etter (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995). For characteristic structural patterns found in crystal salts of 1-phenylethylamine and monocarboxylic acids, see: Kinbara, Hashimoto et al. (1996); Kinbara, Kai et al. (1996); Lemmerer et al. (2008). For related chiral salt structures, see: Johansen et al. (1998); Boussac et al. (2002); Lemmerer et al. (2008).

Computing details top

Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996); data reduction: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of the title compound, with displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level for non-H atoms.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The hydrogen-bonding network in the title compound (hydrogen bonds are dashed). The inset represent the packing structure viewed down the axis of the 21–column (b axis). H atoms have been omitted for clarity. In both figures, cations are green and anions blue.
(R)-1-Phenylethylammonium trifluoroacetate top
Crystal data top
C8H12N+·C2F3O2−F(000) = 488
Mr = 235.21Dx = 1.352 Mg m−3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 70 reflections
a = 6.7821 (5) Åθ = 4.5–12.5°
b = 6.9887 (8) ŵ = 0.13 mm−1
c = 24.378 (2) ÅT = 298 K
V = 1155.49 (19) Å3Prism, colorless
Z = 40.60 × 0.44 × 0.40 mm
Data collection top
Siemens P4
diffractometer		Rint = 0.020
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeθmax = 29.0°, θmin = 1.7°
Graphite monochromatorh = −9→4
2θ/ω scansk = −9→1
3079 measured reflectionsl = −33→1
1808 independent reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
1288 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: 1%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.112 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0464P)2 + 0.1579P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1808 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.16 e Å−3
156 parametersΔρmin = −0.13 e Å−3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 constraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.045 (4)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Crystal data top
C8H12N+·C2F3O2−V = 1155.49 (19) Å3
Mr = 235.21Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 6.7821 (5) ŵ = 0.13 mm−1
b = 6.9887 (8) ÅT = 298 K
c = 24.378 (2) Å0.60 × 0.44 × 0.40 mm
Data collection top
Siemens P4
diffractometer		Rint = 0.020
3079 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
1808 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
1288 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0410 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.112H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3
1808 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.13 e Å−3
156 parameters
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.9254 (3)0.1712 (3)0.19995 (7)0.0480 (4)
H1C1.002 (5)0.206 (4)0.2286 (11)0.072*
H1B0.853 (5)0.062 (5)0.2039 (11)0.072*
H1A0.840 (5)0.268 (5)0.1966 (11)0.072*
C11.0532 (3)0.1429 (4)0.15044 (8)0.0513 (5)
H11.13770.03160.15710.062*
C21.1846 (5)0.3153 (5)0.14290 (11)0.0818 (9)
H2C1.26170.30000.11020.123*
H2B1.27090.32730.17390.123*
H2A1.10490.42830.13980.123*
C30.9260 (3)0.1001 (4)0.10055 (8)0.0502 (5)
C40.9482 (5)−0.0721 (4)0.07311 (11)0.0706 (7)
H41.0390−0.16160.08570.085*
C50.8359 (6)−0.1118 (5)0.02695 (12)0.0893 (10)
H50.8526−0.22720.00860.107*
C60.7020 (5)0.0165 (5)0.00854 (11)0.0819 (10)
H60.6265−0.0114−0.02230.098*
C70.6776 (4)0.1863 (5)0.03497 (10)0.0743 (8)
H70.58590.27440.02210.089*
C80.7891 (4)0.2282 (4)0.08117 (9)0.0633 (7)
H80.77100.34420.09920.076*
C90.6937 (4)0.6770 (3)0.19540 (9)0.0482 (5)
O10.6911 (4)0.5019 (3)0.19191 (10)0.0921 (7)
O20.8190 (3)0.7849 (3)0.21505 (7)0.0620 (5)
C100.5086 (4)0.7725 (4)0.17224 (11)0.0613 (6)
F10.4723 (3)0.7214 (4)0.12145 (7)0.1175 (8)
F20.5178 (3)0.9610 (2)0.17221 (11)0.1065 (8)
F30.3482 (2)0.7254 (3)0.20053 (8)0.0914 (6)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0484 (10)0.0459 (9)0.0498 (9)−0.0030 (9)−0.0118 (9)0.0002 (9)
C10.0420 (10)0.0574 (13)0.0545 (11)0.0045 (11)−0.0077 (10)−0.0010 (10)
C20.0655 (16)0.105 (2)0.0744 (16)−0.029 (2)−0.0104 (14)0.0154 (17)
C30.0429 (11)0.0622 (13)0.0455 (10)0.0012 (12)−0.0017 (9)0.0003 (10)
C40.0760 (17)0.0669 (16)0.0689 (14)0.0113 (16)−0.0136 (15)−0.0104 (13)
C50.116 (3)0.082 (2)0.0699 (15)−0.003 (2)−0.0199 (18)−0.0186 (16)
C60.085 (2)0.106 (3)0.0544 (13)−0.022 (2)−0.0162 (15)−0.0043 (16)
C70.0650 (16)0.099 (2)0.0585 (13)0.0027 (18)−0.0157 (13)0.0114 (15)
C80.0618 (14)0.0706 (16)0.0576 (12)0.0107 (14)−0.0108 (12)−0.0038 (12)
C90.0487 (12)0.0465 (12)0.0495 (10)0.0049 (10)−0.0017 (10)−0.0005 (9)
O10.0946 (16)0.0488 (11)0.1330 (18)0.0160 (11)−0.0199 (16)−0.0080 (11)
O20.0575 (10)0.0609 (10)0.0677 (9)−0.0061 (9)−0.0241 (8)0.0114 (8)
C100.0477 (13)0.0611 (14)0.0753 (14)−0.0048 (13)−0.0089 (12)0.0110 (13)
F10.1021 (14)0.173 (2)0.0768 (10)−0.0089 (18)−0.0389 (10)0.0115 (13)
F20.0614 (10)0.0583 (10)0.200 (2)0.0064 (9)−0.0258 (13)0.0349 (11)
F30.0526 (8)0.0911 (13)0.1303 (14)−0.0024 (10)0.0155 (9)0.0106 (12)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C11.499 (3)C5—C61.352 (5)
N1—H1C0.90 (3)C5—H50.9300
N1—H1B0.92 (3)C6—C71.361 (4)
N1—H1A0.90 (3)C6—H60.9300
C1—C21.510 (4)C7—C81.388 (3)
C1—C31.521 (3)C7—H70.9300
C1—H10.9800C8—H80.9300
C2—H2C0.9600C9—O11.227 (3)
C2—H2B0.9600C9—O21.233 (3)
C2—H2A0.9600C9—C101.530 (3)
C3—C81.374 (3)C10—F11.312 (3)
C3—C41.385 (3)C10—F21.319 (3)
C4—C51.387 (4)C10—F31.329 (3)
C4—H40.9300
C1—N1—H1C109.1 (18)C5—C4—H4119.8
C1—N1—H1B106.6 (18)C6—C5—C4120.4 (3)
H1C—N1—H1B117 (2)C6—C5—H5119.8
C1—N1—H1A113.5 (18)C4—C5—H5119.8
H1C—N1—H1A104 (2)C5—C6—C7120.2 (3)
H1B—N1—H1A107 (2)C5—C6—H6119.9
N1—C1—C2109.5 (2)C7—C6—H6119.9
N1—C1—C3109.99 (17)C6—C7—C8120.1 (3)
C2—C1—C3113.23 (19)C6—C7—H7119.9
N1—C1—H1108.0C8—C7—H7119.9
C2—C1—H1108.0C3—C8—C7120.7 (3)
C3—C1—H1108.0C3—C8—H8119.7
C1—C2—H2C109.5C7—C8—H8119.7
C1—C2—H2B109.5O1—C9—O2130.3 (3)
H2C—C2—H2B109.5O1—C9—C10113.4 (2)
C1—C2—H2A109.5O2—C9—C10116.2 (2)
H2C—C2—H2A109.5F1—C10—F2106.3 (2)
H2B—C2—H2A109.5F1—C10—F3105.6 (2)
C8—C3—C4118.3 (2)F2—C10—F3106.6 (3)
C8—C3—C1122.0 (2)F1—C10—C9112.6 (2)
C4—C3—C1119.7 (2)F2—C10—C9113.4 (2)
C3—C4—C5120.4 (3)F3—C10—C9111.85 (19)
C3—C4—H4119.8
N1—C1—C3—C861.4 (3)C4—C3—C8—C7−0.6 (4)
C2—C1—C3—C8−61.5 (3)C1—C3—C8—C7178.9 (2)
N1—C1—C3—C4−119.1 (2)C6—C7—C8—C30.4 (4)
C2—C1—C3—C4118.0 (3)O1—C9—C10—F1−54.5 (3)
C8—C3—C4—C50.7 (4)O2—C9—C10—F1126.5 (2)
C1—C3—C4—C5−178.8 (3)O1—C9—C10—F2−175.2 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.7 (5)O2—C9—C10—F25.8 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C70.5 (5)O1—C9—C10—F364.2 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C8−0.4 (5)O2—C9—C10—F3−114.8 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O10.90 (3)1.92 (3)2.812 (3)171 (3)
N1—H1B···O2i0.92 (3)1.97 (3)2.818 (3)154 (3)
N1—H1C···O2ii0.90 (3)1.92 (3)2.816 (2)175 (3)
N1—H1B···F2i0.92 (3)2.50 (3)3.202 (3)134 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y−1, z; (ii) −x+2, y−1/2, −z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H12N+·C2F3O2−
Mr235.21
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)6.7821 (5), 6.9887 (8), 24.378 (2)
V (Å3)1155.49 (19)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm−1)0.13
Crystal size (mm)0.60 × 0.44 × 0.40
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens P4
Absorption correction–
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections		3079, 1808, 1288
Rint0.020
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.682
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.041, 0.112, 1.03
No. of reflections1808
No. of parameters156
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.16, −0.13

Computer programs: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996), SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O10.90 (3)1.92 (3)2.812 (3)171 (3)
N1—H1B···O2i0.92 (3)1.97 (3)2.818 (3)154 (3)
N1—H1C···O2ii0.90 (3)1.92 (3)2.816 (2)175 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y−1, z; (ii) −x+2, y−1/2, −z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by CONACyT (grant 83049).

References

First citationBernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationBoussac, H., Crassous, J., Dutasta, J.-P., Grosvalet, L. & Thozet, A. (2002). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 13, 975–981.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationEtter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120–126.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationJohansen, T. N., Ebert, B., Bräuner-Osborne, H., Didriksen, M., Christensen, I. T., Søby, K. K., Madsen, U., Krogsgaard-Larsen, P. & Brehm, L. (1998). J. Med. Chem. 41, 930–939.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
 First citationKinbara, K., Hashimoto, Y., Sukegawa, M., Nohira, H. & Saigo, K. (1996). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 3441–3449.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationKinbara, K., Kai, A., Maekawa, Y., Hashimoto, Y., Naruse, S., Hasegawa, M. & Saigo, K. (1996). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans 2, pp. 247–253.  CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationLemmerer, A., Bourne, S. A. & Fernandes, M. A. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 1106–1109.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationMacrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSiemens (1996). XSCANS. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 66| Part 5| May 2010| Page o1118
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810013565
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS