metal-organic compounds
Dichloridobis(N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylthiourea-κS)mercury(II)
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan, and bDepartment of Chemistry, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
*Correspondence e-mail: saeed_a786@hotmail.com
In the title compound, [HgCl2(C5H12N2S)2], the HgII atom is located on a twofold rotation axis and is bonded in a distorted tetrahedral coordination mode to two chloride ions and to two tetramethylthiourea (tmtu) molecules through their S atoms. The is stabilized by C—H⋯N and C—H⋯S hydrogen bonds.
Related literature
For background to Hg(II) complexes with thiourea ligands, see: Ahmad et al. (2009); Chieh (1977); Lobana et al. (2008); Popovic et al. (2000, 2002). The structure of the title compound is isotypic with [Cd(tmtu)2Br2] (Nawaz et al., 2010a) and [Cd(tmtu)2I2] (Nawaz et al., 2010b).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
|
|
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2008); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810028138/wm2376sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810028138/wm2376Isup2.hkl
To 0.27 g (1.0 mmol) mercury(II) chloride in 10 ml methanol was added two equivalents of tetramethylthiourea in 15 ml methanol. A clear solution was obtained that was stirred for 30 minutes. The colorless solution was filtered and the filtrate was kept at room temperature for crystallization. As a result, a white crystalline product was obtained, that was finally washed with methanol and dried.
H atoms were placed in calculated positions with a C—H distance of 0.96 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.5 Ueq(C).
The coordination chemistry of mercury(II) complexes with thiourea type ligands has been the subject of several recent studies because of the importance of such systems as structural models in biology (Popovic et al., 2000; 2002). Mercury(II) is known form a wide variety of 1:1 and 1:2 complexes of the types LHgX2 (Popovic et al., 2002) and L2HgX2 (Ahmad et al., 2009; Chieh, 1977: Lobana et al., 2008), where X is a halide or pseudohalide, having structural arrangements entirely based on tetrahedral or pseudo-tetrahedral environments. We have recently reported the
of a Hg(CN)2 complex of N,N'-dibutylthiourea (dbtu) (Ahmad et al., 2009). Herein we report on the of a mercury(II) chloride complex of tetramethylthiourea (tmtu), [Hg(C5H12N2S2)2Cl2], (I) .The
of (I) consists of discrete molecular species in which the mercury atom is located on a twofold rotation axis (Fig. 1) and is bonded in a distorted tetrahedral coordination mode to two chloride ions and to two tetramethylthiourea (tmtu) molecules. The Hg—S and Hg—Cl bond lengths are 2.5329 (7) and 2.5028 (8) Å, respectively. The bond angles around Hg are in the range expected for a tetrahedral coordination, with the S—Hg—S angle (120.75 (4)°) having the largest deviation from the ideal value. The main cause of this deviation is the steric interaction between the —CH3 groups. The SCN2— moiety of Tmtu is essentially planar with the C—N and C—S bond lengths corresponding to the values intermediate between single and double bonds.The structure of the title compound is isotypic with [Cd(tmtu)2Br2] (Nawaz et al., 2010a) and [Cd(tmtu)2I2] (Nawaz et al., 2010b).
For a more detailed description of the structure, see: Nawaz et al. (2010a).
For background to Hg(II) complexes with thiourea ligands, see: Ahmad et al. (2009); Chieh (1977); Lobana et al. (2008); Popovic et al. (2000, 2002). The structure of the title compound is isotypic with [Cd(tmtu)2Br2] (Nawaz et al., 2010a) and [Cd(tmtu)2I2] (Nawaz et al., 2010b).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2008); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).Fig. 1. The molecular structure of title compound with atomic numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. H-atoms were omitted for clarity. |
[HgCl2(C5H12N2S)2] | F(000) = 1032 |
Mr = 535.94 | Dx = 1.936 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Cell parameters from 12167 reflections |
a = 18.7418 (12) Å | θ = 2.6–28.3° |
b = 9.5920 (6) Å | µ = 8.88 mm−1 |
c = 13.5177 (9) Å | T = 293 K |
β = 130.834 (1)° | Colourless, plate |
V = 1838.6 (2) Å3 | 0.29 × 0.24 × 0.11 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker SMART APEX area detector diffractometer | 2281 independent reflections |
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube | 2103 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.031 |
ω scans | θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.6° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −24→24 |
Tmin = 0.183, Tmax = 0.442 | k = −12→12 |
12167 measured reflections | l = −18→18 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.020 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.040 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0109P)2 + 2.5249P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.07 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.002 |
2281 reflections | Δρmax = 0.72 e Å−3 |
92 parameters | Δρmin = −0.79 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.00244 (8) |
[HgCl2(C5H12N2S)2] | V = 1838.6 (2) Å3 |
Mr = 535.94 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 18.7418 (12) Å | µ = 8.88 mm−1 |
b = 9.5920 (6) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 13.5177 (9) Å | 0.29 × 0.24 × 0.11 mm |
β = 130.834 (1)° |
Bruker SMART APEX area detector diffractometer | 2281 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 2103 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.183, Tmax = 0.442 | Rint = 0.031 |
12167 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.020 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.040 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.07 | Δρmax = 0.72 e Å−3 |
2281 reflections | Δρmin = −0.79 e Å−3 |
92 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Hg1 | 1.0000 | 0.703186 (17) | 0.2500 | 0.04539 (7) | |
Cl1 | 1.14323 (5) | 0.55933 (9) | 0.34397 (8) | 0.0591 (2) | |
S1 | 1.02994 (5) | 0.83371 (9) | 0.43697 (7) | 0.04983 (18) | |
N1 | 0.91286 (18) | 0.7622 (3) | 0.4747 (3) | 0.0482 (6) | |
N2 | 0.84430 (16) | 0.8798 (3) | 0.2830 (2) | 0.0488 (6) | |
C1 | 0.92029 (18) | 0.8240 (3) | 0.3933 (3) | 0.0367 (5) | |
C2 | 0.8466 (3) | 0.8103 (4) | 0.4900 (4) | 0.0704 (10) | |
H2A | 0.8192 | 0.8971 | 0.4446 | 0.106* | |
H2B | 0.8793 | 0.8232 | 0.5812 | 0.106* | |
H2C | 0.7977 | 0.7421 | 0.4542 | 0.106* | |
C3 | 0.9842 (3) | 0.6647 (4) | 0.5756 (4) | 0.0769 (11) | |
H3A | 1.0131 | 0.6182 | 0.5468 | 0.115* | |
H3B | 0.9549 | 0.5970 | 0.5914 | 0.115* | |
H3C | 1.0313 | 0.7149 | 0.6548 | 0.115* | |
C4 | 0.7491 (2) | 0.8240 (5) | 0.2114 (4) | 0.0802 (12) | |
H4A | 0.7531 | 0.7329 | 0.2441 | 0.120* | |
H4B | 0.7174 | 0.8179 | 0.1200 | 0.120* | |
H4C | 0.7144 | 0.8847 | 0.2231 | 0.120* | |
C5 | 0.8518 (3) | 0.9798 (4) | 0.2094 (4) | 0.0774 (11) | |
H5A | 0.9121 | 1.0250 | 0.2669 | 0.116* | |
H5B | 0.8027 | 1.0483 | 0.1711 | 0.116* | |
H5C | 0.8454 | 0.9323 | 0.1414 | 0.116* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Hg1 | 0.05014 (10) | 0.04849 (10) | 0.05259 (11) | 0.000 | 0.04018 (9) | 0.000 |
Cl1 | 0.0519 (4) | 0.0599 (5) | 0.0652 (5) | 0.0126 (3) | 0.0381 (4) | 0.0065 (4) |
S1 | 0.0386 (3) | 0.0716 (5) | 0.0453 (4) | −0.0091 (3) | 0.0300 (3) | −0.0142 (3) |
N1 | 0.0611 (15) | 0.0488 (13) | 0.0566 (14) | 0.0005 (11) | 0.0480 (13) | 0.0002 (11) |
N2 | 0.0439 (13) | 0.0560 (15) | 0.0465 (13) | 0.0051 (11) | 0.0295 (11) | 0.0020 (11) |
C1 | 0.0415 (13) | 0.0364 (13) | 0.0415 (13) | −0.0023 (10) | 0.0312 (12) | −0.0061 (10) |
C2 | 0.085 (2) | 0.081 (3) | 0.092 (3) | −0.011 (2) | 0.078 (2) | −0.014 (2) |
C3 | 0.098 (3) | 0.070 (2) | 0.076 (2) | 0.015 (2) | 0.063 (2) | 0.024 (2) |
C4 | 0.0387 (17) | 0.116 (3) | 0.070 (2) | −0.0013 (18) | 0.0292 (17) | −0.015 (2) |
C5 | 0.088 (3) | 0.081 (3) | 0.069 (2) | 0.027 (2) | 0.054 (2) | 0.029 (2) |
Hg1—Cl1i | 2.5028 (8) | C2—H2B | 0.9600 |
Hg1—Cl1 | 2.5028 (8) | C2—H2C | 0.9600 |
Hg1—S1 | 2.5329 (7) | C3—H3A | 0.9600 |
Hg1—S1i | 2.5329 (7) | C3—H3B | 0.9600 |
S1—C1 | 1.730 (3) | C3—H3C | 0.9600 |
N1—C1 | 1.336 (3) | C4—H4A | 0.9600 |
N1—C2 | 1.460 (4) | C4—H4B | 0.9600 |
N1—C3 | 1.461 (4) | C4—H4C | 0.9600 |
N2—C1 | 1.327 (3) | C5—H5A | 0.9600 |
N2—C5 | 1.453 (4) | C5—H5B | 0.9600 |
N2—C4 | 1.466 (4) | C5—H5C | 0.9600 |
C2—H2A | 0.9600 | ||
Cl1i—Hg1—Cl1 | 113.08 (4) | H2A—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
Cl1i—Hg1—S1 | 104.08 (3) | H2B—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
Cl1—Hg1—S1 | 107.56 (3) | N1—C3—H3A | 109.5 |
Cl1i—Hg1—S1i | 107.56 (3) | N1—C3—H3B | 109.5 |
Cl1—Hg1—S1i | 104.08 (3) | H3A—C3—H3B | 109.5 |
S1—Hg1—S1i | 120.75 (4) | N1—C3—H3C | 109.5 |
C1—S1—Hg1 | 101.20 (9) | H3A—C3—H3C | 109.5 |
C1—N1—C2 | 122.2 (3) | H3B—C3—H3C | 109.5 |
C1—N1—C3 | 121.9 (3) | N2—C4—H4A | 109.5 |
C2—N1—C3 | 114.4 (3) | N2—C4—H4B | 109.5 |
C1—N2—C5 | 121.5 (3) | H4A—C4—H4B | 109.5 |
C1—N2—C4 | 122.9 (3) | N2—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
C5—N2—C4 | 114.2 (3) | H4A—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
N2—C1—N1 | 119.5 (2) | H4B—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
N2—C1—S1 | 121.6 (2) | N2—C5—H5A | 109.5 |
N1—C1—S1 | 118.9 (2) | N2—C5—H5B | 109.5 |
N1—C2—H2A | 109.5 | H5A—C5—H5B | 109.5 |
N1—C2—H2B | 109.5 | N2—C5—H5C | 109.5 |
H2A—C2—H2B | 109.5 | H5A—C5—H5C | 109.5 |
N1—C2—H2C | 109.5 | H5B—C5—H5C | 109.5 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, y, −z+1/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C2—H2A···N2 | 0.96 | 2.52 | 2.849 (6) | 100 |
C3—H3A···S1 | 0.96 | 2.68 | 2.996 (6) | 100 |
C5—H5A···S1 | 0.96 | 2.62 | 3.024 (5) | 105 |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [HgCl2(C5H12N2S)2] |
Mr | 535.94 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 18.7418 (12), 9.5920 (6), 13.5177 (9) |
β (°) | 130.834 (1) |
V (Å3) | 1838.6 (2) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 8.88 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.29 × 0.24 × 0.11 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART APEX area detector |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.183, 0.442 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 12167, 2281, 2103 |
Rint | 0.031 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.667 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.020, 0.040, 1.07 |
No. of reflections | 2281 |
No. of parameters | 92 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.72, −0.79 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2008), SAINT (Bruker, 2008), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C2—H2A···N2 | 0.96 | 2.52 | 2.849 (6) | 100 |
C3—H3A···S1 | 0.96 | 2.68 | 2.996 (6) | 100 |
C5—H5A···S1 | 0.96 | 2.62 | 3.024 (5) | 105 |
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, for providing the X-ray facility.
References
Ahmad, S., Sadaf, H., Akkurt, M., Sharif, S. & Khan, I. U. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, m1191–m1192. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bruker (2008). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Chieh, C. (1977). Can. J. Chem. 55, 1583-1587. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Lobana, T. S., Sharma, R., Sharma, R., Sultana, R. & Butcher, R. J. (2008). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 634, 718–723. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nawaz, S., Sadaf, S., Fettouhi, M., Fazal, A. & Ahmad, S. (2010a). Acta Cryst. E66, m950. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nawaz, S., Sadaf, S., Fettouhi, M., Fazal, A. & Ahmad, S. (2010b). Acta Cryst. E66, m951. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Popovic, Z., Pavlovic, G., Matkovic-Calogovic, D., Soldin, Z., Rajic, M., Vikic-Topic, D. & Kovacek, D. (2000). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 306, 142–152. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Popovic, Z., Soldin, Z. G., Pavlovic, G., Matkovic-Calogovic, D., Mrvos-Sermek, D. & Rajic, M. (2002). Struct. Chem. 13, 425–436. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The coordination chemistry of mercury(II) complexes with thiourea type ligands has been the subject of several recent studies because of the importance of such systems as structural models in biology (Popovic et al., 2000; 2002). Mercury(II) is known form a wide variety of 1:1 and 1:2 complexes of the types LHgX2 (Popovic et al., 2002) and L2HgX2 (Ahmad et al., 2009; Chieh, 1977: Lobana et al., 2008), where X is a halide or pseudohalide, having structural arrangements entirely based on tetrahedral or pseudo-tetrahedral environments. We have recently reported the crystal structure of a Hg(CN)2 complex of N,N'-dibutylthiourea (dbtu) (Ahmad et al., 2009). Herein we report on the crystal structure of a mercury(II) chloride complex of tetramethylthiourea (tmtu), [Hg(C5H12N2S2)2Cl2], (I) .
The crystal structure of (I) consists of discrete molecular species in which the mercury atom is located on a twofold rotation axis (Fig. 1) and is bonded in a distorted tetrahedral coordination mode to two chloride ions and to two tetramethylthiourea (tmtu) molecules. The Hg—S and Hg—Cl bond lengths are 2.5329 (7) and 2.5028 (8) Å, respectively. The bond angles around Hg are in the range expected for a tetrahedral coordination, with the S—Hg—S angle (120.75 (4)°) having the largest deviation from the ideal value. The main cause of this deviation is the steric interaction between the —CH3 groups. The SCN2— moiety of Tmtu is essentially planar with the C—N and C—S bond lengths corresponding to the values intermediate between single and double bonds.
The structure of the title compound is isotypic with [Cd(tmtu)2Br2] (Nawaz et al., 2010a) and [Cd(tmtu)2I2] (Nawaz et al., 2010b).
For a more detailed description of the structure, see: Nawaz et al. (2010a).