metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Bis(2,2′-bi-1H-imidazole-κ2N3,N3′)bis­­(di­methyl sulfoxide-κO)copper(II) bis­­(tetra­fluoridoborate)

aDepartment of Chemistry, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, People's Republic of China, and bBeijing Key Laboratory for Terahertz Spectroscopy and Imaging, Key Laboratory of Terahertz Optoelectronics, Ministry of Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: jinqh204@163.com

(Received 18 July 2010; accepted 9 August 2010; online 18 August 2010)

In the title copper(II) salt, [Cu(C6H6N4)2(C2H6OS)2](BF4)2, the Jahn–Teller distorted octa­hedral coordination sphere of copper is formed from four 2,2′-bi-1H-imidazole N atoms and two dimethyl sulfoxide O atoms. The Cu atom lies on a center of inversion. N—H⋯O and N—H⋯F hydrogen bonds give rise to a one-dimensional structure. The BF4 anion is disordered over two sites in a 0.671 (10):0.329 (10) ratio.

Related literature

Supra­molecular complexes containing H2biim (H2biim = 2,2′-biimidazole) have been applied widely in mol­ecular catalysis, photoelectric conversion materials and mol­ecular recognition, see: Ding et al. (2005[Ding, B. B., Weng, Y. Q., Mao, Z. W., Lam, C. K., Chen, X. M. & Ye, B. H. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 8836-8845.]). For the effect of the coordination bonds, inter­molecular hydrogen bonds and ππ packing inter­actions on the mol­ecular arrangement, see: Burrows (2004[Burrows, A. D. (2004). Struct. Bond. 108, 55-96.]); Dai et al. (2009[Dai, Y. C., Zhou, L. L., Zhang, Y. Y. & Jin, Q. H. (2009). Chin. Inorg. Chem. 25, 2202-2206.]). For related structures, see: Jin et al. (2010[Jin, Q. H., Zhou, L. L., Xu, L. J., Zhang, Y.-Y. & Lu, X. M. (2010). Polyhedron, 29, 317-327.]); Aminou et al. (2004[Aminou, M., Gerard, A. A. & Willem, L. D. (2004). Polyhedron, 23, 1969-1973.]); Gruia et al. (2007[Gruia, L. M., Rochon, F. D. & Beauchamp, A. L. (2007). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 360, 1825-1840.]); Yang et al. (2008[Yang, L. N., Li, J., Liu, J. J., Jiao, H. & Zhang, P. X. (2008). J. Baoji Univ. Arts Sci. (Natur. Sci.), 28, 28-32.]). For Cu—O coordination bond lengths, see: Tao et al. (2002[Tao, J., Zhang, Y. & Chen, X. M. (2002). Chem. Commun. pp. 1342-1343.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • [Cu(C6H6N4)2(C2H6OS)2](BF4)2

  • Mr = 661.71

  • Triclinic, [P \overline 1]

  • a = 7.059 (1) Å

  • b = 10.0721 (13) Å

  • c = 10.3669 (15) Å

  • α = 113.436 (2)°

  • β = 96.860 (1)°

  • γ = 92.000 (1)°

  • V = 668.68 (16) Å3

  • Z = 1

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.06 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.36 × 0.32 × 0.20 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.701, Tmax = 0.816

  • 3418 measured reflections

  • 2293 independent reflections

  • 1885 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.023

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040

  • wR(F2) = 0.111

  • S = 1.03

  • 2293 reflections

  • 209 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.34 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3

Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å)

Cu1—N1 2.016 (2)
Cu1—N3 2.016 (2)
Cu1—O1 2.678 (2)

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O1ii 0.86 1.94 2.745 (4) 155
N4—H4⋯F1iii 0.86 2.26 2.874 (4) 128
N4—H4⋯O1ii 0.86 2.40 3.127 (4) 142
Symmetry codes: (ii) -x, -y+1, -z+1; (iii) x-1, y, z.

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information


Comment top

Supramolecular complexes containing H2biim have been applied widely in molecular catalysis, photoelectric conversion materials and molecular recognition (Ding et al., 2005) The ligand of H2biim has been widely studied and applied because of the diversity of their coordination and the strong ability to form hydrogen bonds as a multi-proton donor. The utilization of the coordination bonds of a transition metal ion, intermolecular hydrogen bonds and πi-πi packing interactions help to control the molecular arrangement (Burrows, 2004; Dai et al., 2009). We focus on the synthesis of the biimidazole-metal complexes. Here we report a new complex [Cu(H2biim)2(DMSO)2](BF4)2 (1). Similar complexes {[Cu(H2biim)2(H2O)](SiF6)}.H2O (2), [Cu(H2biim)2](ClO4)2.2DMSO (Jin et al.,2010) and [Cd(H2biim)3](SiF6)(BF4)2.6EtOH (Gruia et al.,2007) will be compared here.

The title complex is composed of [Cu(H2biim)2(DMSO)2]2+ and two free BF4- anions. Cu(II) atom is in the center of Jahn-Teller elongated octahedron. The equatorial positions are occupied by four nitrogen atoms of two bidentate H2biim molecules, while the axial positions are occupied by O atoms from two DMSO (Fig. 1). The [Cu(H2biim)2(DMSO)2]2+ unit stacks along the b axis to form a step-shaped infinite chain structure through πi-πi stacking and H-bonds(Fig.2).

The two identical distances Cu ··· O(DMSO) of 2.678 (2)Å are in the range of Cu—O coordination bond (from 2.522Å to 2.724 Å) (Tao et al., 2002). The two identical Cu—N distances of 2.016 (2)Å are slightly shorter than those in [Cu(H2biim)2](ClO4)2.2DMSO [2.021 (2)Å and 2.018 (2) Å]. In the title complex there exist two types of hydrogen bonds, one is N—H···O formed between N—H group of the H2biim and oxygen atom of DMSO, the other is N—H···F formed between N—H group of H2biim and fluorine atom of BF4-. The DMSO molecule and BF4- anion are located at both sides of the cation to form hydrogen bonds mentioned above. The face-to-face distance between the immidazole rings is 3.43Å with the dihedral angle of 3.718°, which suggests the existence of significant πi-πi interactions between them. There is a weak interaction Cu···SDMSO(3.458 Å) in complex (1).

The solvent plays an important role in the reaction of metal salt with 2,2'-bimidazole. Not only the configuration of the anions but also the coordination geometry of the cations are affected by the solvent. Complex 1 was prepared in the mixed solvent of ethanol and DMSO by the reaction of 2,2'- bimidazole with copper tetrafluoroborate with molar ratio 3:1. However, the ratio of ligand and metal in the cation [Cu(H2biim)2(DMSO)2]2+ of complex 1 is not consistent with the raw molar ratio, which may be related to the selectivity of solvent DMSO. Complex 2, {[Cu(H2biim)2(H2O)]SiF6}.H2O, was prepared by the similar method of preparing (1) except using solvent water (Jin et al.,2010). Due to the different solvents, both the cation and the anion in complex (1) and complex (2) are different. It is noted that in complex (1) the anion BF4- was coming from starting material Cu(BF4)2 while in complex (2) the anion SiF62- was not, but was formed by the reaction of BF4- with glass container in water. The complex [Cd(H2biim)3](SiF6)(BF4)2.6EtOH(Gruia et al.,2007) contains mixed cations SiF6 2-and BF4-, which is related to the mixed solvent water and enthanol used in the reaction system.

The title complex is also similar to the following complexes: [Cu(H2biim)2](ClO4)2 (Aminou et al.,2004), [Cu(H2biim)2]Br2(Yang et al.,2008) and [Cu(H2biim)2](ClO4)2.2DMSO (Jin et al.,2010).

Related literature top

Supramolecular complexes containing H2biim have been applied widely in molecular catalysis, photoelectric conversion materials and molecular recognition, see: Ding et al. (2005). For the effect of the coordination bonds, intermolecular hydrogen bonds and πi–πi packing interactions on the molecular arrangement, see: Burrows (2004); Dai et al. (2009). For related structures, see: Jin et al. (2010); Aminou et al. (2004); Gruia et al. (2007); Yang et al. (2008). or Cu—O coordination bond lengths, see: Tao et al. (2002).

Experimental top

Cu(BF4)2.6H2O (0.1726 g, 1 mmol)dissolved in C2H5OH (5 ml) was added to a solution of H2biim (0.2010 g, 3 mmol) in C2H5OH (5 ml). The mixture was refluxed for 0.5 h, then 1 ml DMSO was added, stirring for another hour at room temperature, then filtered. Subsequent slow evaporation of the filtrate resulted in the formation of green crystals of the title complex after four weeks. Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were selected directly from the sample as prepared. Analysis found(percentage): C 38.08, H 3.83, N 22.19; calculated:C 37.71, H 3.90, N 21.86.

Refinement top

Metal atom centers were located from the E-maps and other non-hydrogen atoms were located in successive difference Fourier syntheses. The final refinements were performed by full matrix least-squares methods with anisotropic thermal parameters for non-hydrogen atoms on F2.

The final refinements were performed with isotropic thermal parameters. All hydrogen atoms were located in the calculated sites and included in the final refinement in the riding model approximation with displacement parameters derived from the parent atoms to which they were bonded.

Structure description top

Supramolecular complexes containing H2biim have been applied widely in molecular catalysis, photoelectric conversion materials and molecular recognition (Ding et al., 2005) The ligand of H2biim has been widely studied and applied because of the diversity of their coordination and the strong ability to form hydrogen bonds as a multi-proton donor. The utilization of the coordination bonds of a transition metal ion, intermolecular hydrogen bonds and πi-πi packing interactions help to control the molecular arrangement (Burrows, 2004; Dai et al., 2009). We focus on the synthesis of the biimidazole-metal complexes. Here we report a new complex [Cu(H2biim)2(DMSO)2](BF4)2 (1). Similar complexes {[Cu(H2biim)2(H2O)](SiF6)}.H2O (2), [Cu(H2biim)2](ClO4)2.2DMSO (Jin et al.,2010) and [Cd(H2biim)3](SiF6)(BF4)2.6EtOH (Gruia et al.,2007) will be compared here.

The title complex is composed of [Cu(H2biim)2(DMSO)2]2+ and two free BF4- anions. Cu(II) atom is in the center of Jahn-Teller elongated octahedron. The equatorial positions are occupied by four nitrogen atoms of two bidentate H2biim molecules, while the axial positions are occupied by O atoms from two DMSO (Fig. 1). The [Cu(H2biim)2(DMSO)2]2+ unit stacks along the b axis to form a step-shaped infinite chain structure through πi-πi stacking and H-bonds(Fig.2).

The two identical distances Cu ··· O(DMSO) of 2.678 (2)Å are in the range of Cu—O coordination bond (from 2.522Å to 2.724 Å) (Tao et al., 2002). The two identical Cu—N distances of 2.016 (2)Å are slightly shorter than those in [Cu(H2biim)2](ClO4)2.2DMSO [2.021 (2)Å and 2.018 (2) Å]. In the title complex there exist two types of hydrogen bonds, one is N—H···O formed between N—H group of the H2biim and oxygen atom of DMSO, the other is N—H···F formed between N—H group of H2biim and fluorine atom of BF4-. The DMSO molecule and BF4- anion are located at both sides of the cation to form hydrogen bonds mentioned above. The face-to-face distance between the immidazole rings is 3.43Å with the dihedral angle of 3.718°, which suggests the existence of significant πi-πi interactions between them. There is a weak interaction Cu···SDMSO(3.458 Å) in complex (1).

The solvent plays an important role in the reaction of metal salt with 2,2'-bimidazole. Not only the configuration of the anions but also the coordination geometry of the cations are affected by the solvent. Complex 1 was prepared in the mixed solvent of ethanol and DMSO by the reaction of 2,2'- bimidazole with copper tetrafluoroborate with molar ratio 3:1. However, the ratio of ligand and metal in the cation [Cu(H2biim)2(DMSO)2]2+ of complex 1 is not consistent with the raw molar ratio, which may be related to the selectivity of solvent DMSO. Complex 2, {[Cu(H2biim)2(H2O)]SiF6}.H2O, was prepared by the similar method of preparing (1) except using solvent water (Jin et al.,2010). Due to the different solvents, both the cation and the anion in complex (1) and complex (2) are different. It is noted that in complex (1) the anion BF4- was coming from starting material Cu(BF4)2 while in complex (2) the anion SiF62- was not, but was formed by the reaction of BF4- with glass container in water. The complex [Cd(H2biim)3](SiF6)(BF4)2.6EtOH(Gruia et al.,2007) contains mixed cations SiF6 2-and BF4-, which is related to the mixed solvent water and enthanol used in the reaction system.

The title complex is also similar to the following complexes: [Cu(H2biim)2](ClO4)2 (Aminou et al.,2004), [Cu(H2biim)2]Br2(Yang et al.,2008) and [Cu(H2biim)2](ClO4)2.2DMSO (Jin et al.,2010).

Supramolecular complexes containing H2biim have been applied widely in molecular catalysis, photoelectric conversion materials and molecular recognition, see: Ding et al. (2005). For the effect of the coordination bonds, intermolecular hydrogen bonds and πi–πi packing interactions on the molecular arrangement, see: Burrows (2004); Dai et al. (2009). For related structures, see: Jin et al. (2010); Aminou et al. (2004); Gruia et al. (2007); Yang et al. (2008). or Cu—O coordination bond lengths, see: Tao et al. (2002).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Perspective view of a basic unit of the title complex. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Atoms are displayed as elliposoids at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Step-like chain of [Cu(H2biim)2(DMSO)2]2+ (BF4)2 unit along b axis.
Bis(2,2'-bi-1H-imidazole-κ2N3,N3')bis(dimethyl sulfoxide-κO)copper(II) bis(tetrafluoridoborate) top
Crystal data top
[Cu(C6H6N4)2(C2H6OS)2](BF4)2Z = 1
Mr = 661.71F(000) = 335
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.643 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.059 (1) ÅCell parameters from 2039 reflections
b = 10.0721 (13) Åθ = 2.2–27.1°
c = 10.3669 (15) ŵ = 1.06 mm1
α = 113.436 (2)°T = 298 K
β = 96.860 (1)°Block, green
γ = 92.000 (1)°0.36 × 0.32 × 0.20 mm
V = 668.68 (16) Å3
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2293 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1885 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.023
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
SADABS
h = 88
Tmin = 0.701, Tmax = 0.816k = 1111
3418 measured reflectionsl = 1211
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.111 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0545P)2 + 0.5099P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2293 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.34 e Å3
209 parametersΔρmin = 0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.048 (5)
Crystal data top
[Cu(C6H6N4)2(C2H6OS)2](BF4)2γ = 92.000 (1)°
Mr = 661.71V = 668.68 (16) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 1
a = 7.059 (1) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 10.0721 (13) ŵ = 1.06 mm1
c = 10.3669 (15) ÅT = 298 K
α = 113.436 (2)°0.36 × 0.32 × 0.20 mm
β = 96.860 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2293 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
SADABS
1885 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.701, Tmax = 0.816Rint = 0.023
3418 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0400 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.111H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.34 e Å3
2293 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.32 e Å3
209 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Cu10.50000.50000.50000.0390 (2)
F10.7595 (5)0.2780 (3)0.7673 (4)0.1074 (11)
F20.7494 (11)0.2364 (7)0.9569 (6)0.133 (3)0.671 (10)
F30.8593 (16)0.0735 (12)0.7739 (12)0.131 (5)0.671 (10)
F40.5500 (11)0.1020 (9)0.7667 (9)0.111 (3)0.671 (10)
F2'0.676 (3)0.0585 (13)0.6485 (15)0.153 (7)0.329 (10)
F3'0.577 (2)0.1641 (18)0.8495 (19)0.114 (7)0.329 (10)
F4'0.873 (3)0.121 (3)0.844 (3)0.137 (10)0.329 (10)
N10.3310 (3)0.6573 (3)0.5939 (3)0.0400 (6)
N20.0728 (4)0.7101 (3)0.6960 (3)0.0487 (7)
H20.02970.70020.72970.058*
N30.3261 (3)0.3835 (3)0.5650 (3)0.0392 (6)
N40.0623 (4)0.3776 (3)0.6562 (3)0.0472 (7)
H40.03920.40470.69430.057*
O10.2552 (3)0.4077 (3)0.2573 (2)0.0501 (6)
S10.37073 (11)0.34825 (10)0.13515 (8)0.0454 (3)
B20.7268 (7)0.1654 (5)0.8039 (6)0.0657 (13)
C10.1883 (4)0.6060 (4)0.6387 (3)0.0378 (7)
C20.1466 (5)0.8336 (4)0.6911 (4)0.0585 (10)
H2A0.09720.92350.72520.070*
C30.3060 (5)0.8018 (4)0.6273 (4)0.0526 (9)
H30.38490.86630.60930.063*
C40.1839 (4)0.4588 (4)0.6222 (3)0.0377 (7)
C50.1283 (5)0.2444 (5)0.6198 (4)0.0579 (10)
H50.07200.16510.63030.069*
C60.2919 (5)0.2493 (4)0.5652 (4)0.0516 (9)
H60.36910.17320.53290.062*
C70.2567 (7)0.3869 (5)0.0058 (4)0.0692 (11)
H7A0.12240.35620.02260.104*
H7B0.31210.33600.09020.104*
H7C0.27350.48950.01890.104*
C80.3115 (7)0.1570 (5)0.0606 (5)0.0762 (13)
H8B0.35050.11930.13040.114*
H8C0.37650.11220.02020.114*
H8A0.17560.13630.03140.114*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0288 (3)0.0399 (4)0.0538 (4)0.0093 (2)0.0220 (2)0.0197 (3)
F10.110 (2)0.0760 (19)0.165 (3)0.0132 (16)0.069 (2)0.066 (2)
F20.163 (6)0.137 (5)0.080 (4)0.018 (4)0.039 (4)0.020 (3)
F30.130 (10)0.099 (7)0.197 (12)0.083 (7)0.096 (10)0.067 (7)
F40.084 (4)0.102 (6)0.142 (7)0.037 (4)0.005 (5)0.053 (5)
F2'0.180 (15)0.096 (9)0.129 (11)0.004 (8)0.030 (10)0.013 (7)
F3'0.095 (13)0.124 (13)0.143 (16)0.020 (10)0.085 (13)0.056 (11)
F4'0.098 (13)0.120 (17)0.18 (2)0.012 (11)0.044 (14)0.060 (15)
N10.0305 (13)0.0407 (15)0.0455 (15)0.0044 (11)0.0131 (11)0.0119 (12)
N20.0365 (14)0.0599 (19)0.0431 (16)0.0132 (13)0.0190 (12)0.0095 (14)
N30.0332 (13)0.0446 (15)0.0454 (15)0.0063 (11)0.0135 (11)0.0217 (12)
N40.0333 (14)0.066 (2)0.0450 (16)0.0008 (13)0.0155 (12)0.0237 (14)
O10.0525 (14)0.0504 (14)0.0450 (13)0.0066 (11)0.0263 (11)0.0113 (11)
S10.0382 (5)0.0576 (6)0.0371 (5)0.0021 (4)0.0142 (3)0.0134 (4)
B20.051 (3)0.052 (3)0.105 (4)0.009 (2)0.034 (3)0.037 (3)
C10.0261 (14)0.0506 (19)0.0314 (15)0.0073 (13)0.0100 (12)0.0092 (14)
C20.056 (2)0.048 (2)0.059 (2)0.0190 (18)0.0190 (18)0.0050 (18)
C30.050 (2)0.042 (2)0.064 (2)0.0095 (15)0.0198 (17)0.0154 (17)
C40.0261 (14)0.056 (2)0.0328 (16)0.0029 (13)0.0103 (12)0.0181 (14)
C50.055 (2)0.065 (3)0.065 (2)0.0041 (19)0.0159 (18)0.037 (2)
C60.050 (2)0.051 (2)0.063 (2)0.0090 (16)0.0183 (17)0.0298 (18)
C70.089 (3)0.070 (3)0.053 (2)0.015 (2)0.015 (2)0.026 (2)
C80.100 (3)0.054 (3)0.075 (3)0.020 (2)0.037 (3)0.018 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N12.016 (2)N4—H40.8600
Cu1—N1i2.016 (2)N4—C41.335 (4)
Cu1—N3i2.016 (2)N4—C51.357 (5)
Cu1—N32.016 (2)O1—S11.519 (2)
Cu1—O12.678 (2)S1—C71.769 (4)
F1—B21.351 (5)S1—C81.779 (4)
F2—B21.443 (8)C1—C41.422 (5)
F3—B21.316 (9)C2—H2A0.9300
F4—B21.322 (8)C2—C31.356 (5)
F2'—B21.529 (14)C3—H30.9300
F3'—B21.213 (13)C5—H50.9300
F4'—B21.23 (2)C5—C61.353 (5)
N1—C11.328 (4)C6—H60.9300
N1—C31.378 (4)C7—H7A0.9600
N2—H20.8600C7—H7B0.9600
N2—C11.340 (4)C7—H7C0.9600
N2—C21.353 (5)C8—H8B0.9600
N3—C41.331 (4)C8—H8C0.9600
N3—C61.365 (4)C8—H8A0.9600
F1—B2—F2102.1 (5)N3—C6—H6125.3
F1—B2—F2'92.2 (7)N4—C4—C1132.0 (3)
F2—B2—F2'165.0 (7)N4—C5—H5126.6
F3—B2—F1113.0 (7)O1—S1—C7107.35 (18)
F3—B2—F2106.0 (7)O1—S1—C8104.93 (18)
F3—B2—F4113.7 (8)S1—O1—Cu1107.75 (12)
F3—B2—F2'71.8 (8)S1—C7—H7A109.5
F4—B2—F1115.9 (6)S1—C7—H7B109.5
F4—B2—F2104.4 (6)S1—C7—H7C109.5
F4—B2—F2'64.6 (8)S1—C8—H8B109.5
F3'—B2—F1114.3 (9)S1—C8—H8C109.5
F3'—B2—F267.7 (10)S1—C8—H8A109.5
F3'—B2—F3132.6 (11)C1—N1—Cu1111.0 (2)
F3'—B2—F437.9 (7)C1—N1—C3106.2 (3)
F3'—B2—F2'102.4 (11)C1—N2—H2126.1
F3'—B2—F4'123.6 (18)C1—N2—C2107.7 (3)
F4'—B2—F1114.2 (15)C2—N2—H2126.1
F4'—B2—F275.5 (12)C2—C3—N1108.3 (3)
F4'—B2—F331.1 (11)C2—C3—H3125.9
F4'—B2—F4128.6 (14)C3—N1—Cu1142.8 (2)
F4'—B2—F2'102.9 (11)C3—C2—H2A126.3
N1—Cu1—N1i180.00 (16)C4—N3—Cu1111.3 (2)
N1i—Cu1—N3i82.24 (10)C4—N3—C6105.6 (3)
N1i—Cu1—N397.76 (10)C4—N4—H4126.3
N1—Cu1—N3i97.76 (10)C4—N4—C5107.5 (3)
N1—Cu1—N382.24 (10)C5—N4—H4126.3
N1—Cu1—O190.17 (9)C5—C6—N3109.4 (3)
N1i—Cu1—O189.83 (9)C5—C6—H6125.3
N1—C1—N2110.5 (3)C6—N3—Cu1143.0 (2)
N1—C1—C4118.0 (3)C6—C5—N4106.7 (3)
N1—C3—H3125.9C6—C5—H5126.6
N2—C1—C4131.6 (3)C7—S1—C898.8 (2)
N2—C2—H2A126.3H7A—C7—H7B109.5
N2—C2—C3107.3 (3)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
N3i—Cu1—N3180.0H7B—C7—H7C109.5
N3—Cu1—O187.32 (9)H8B—C8—H8C109.5
N3i—Cu1—O192.68 (9)H8B—C8—H8A109.5
N3—C4—N4110.9 (3)H8C—C8—H8A109.5
N3—C4—C1117.1 (3)
Cu1—N1—C1—N2177.6 (2)N3—Cu1—N1—C3176.9 (4)
Cu1—N1—C1—C43.6 (3)N3i—Cu1—N1—C33.1 (4)
Cu1—N1—C3—C2177.8 (3)N3i—Cu1—N3—C468 (100)
Cu1—N3—C4—N4175.87 (19)N3i—Cu1—N3—C6107 (100)
Cu1—N3—C4—C15.3 (3)N3—Cu1—O1—S1129.93 (14)
Cu1—N3—C6—C5173.6 (3)N3i—Cu1—O1—S150.07 (14)
Cu1—O1—S1—C7146.23 (18)N4—C5—C6—N31.1 (4)
Cu1—O1—S1—C8109.39 (19)O1—Cu1—N1—C182.3 (2)
N1i—Cu1—N1—C1142 (100)O1—Cu1—N1—C395.8 (4)
N1i—Cu1—N1—C340 (100)O1—Cu1—N3—C485.0 (2)
N1i—Cu1—N3—C4174.5 (2)O1—Cu1—N3—C689.6 (4)
N1—Cu1—N3—C45.5 (2)C1—N1—C3—C20.4 (4)
N1i—Cu1—N3—C60.1 (4)C1—N2—C2—C31.3 (4)
N1—Cu1—N3—C6179.9 (4)C2—N2—C1—N11.6 (4)
N1—Cu1—O1—S1147.85 (14)C2—N2—C1—C4177.0 (3)
N1i—Cu1—O1—S132.15 (14)C3—N1—C1—N21.2 (4)
N1—C1—C4—N31.2 (4)C3—N1—C1—C4177.6 (3)
N1—C1—C4—N4179.7 (3)C4—N3—C6—C51.2 (4)
N2—C1—C4—N3177.3 (3)C4—N4—C5—C60.7 (4)
N2—C1—C4—N41.3 (6)C5—N4—C4—N30.0 (4)
N2—C2—C3—N10.5 (4)C5—N4—C4—C1178.6 (3)
N3i—Cu1—N1—C1175.1 (2)C6—N3—C4—N40.7 (4)
N3—Cu1—N1—C14.9 (2)C6—N3—C4—C1178.1 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O1ii0.861.942.745 (4)155
N4—H4···F1iii0.862.262.874 (4)128
N4—H4···O1ii0.862.403.127 (4)142
Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y+1, z+1; (iii) x1, y, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu(C6H6N4)2(C2H6OS)2](BF4)2
Mr661.71
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)7.059 (1), 10.0721 (13), 10.3669 (15)
α, β, γ (°)113.436 (2), 96.860 (1), 92.000 (1)
V3)668.68 (16)
Z1
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.06
Crystal size (mm)0.36 × 0.32 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
SADABS
Tmin, Tmax0.701, 0.816
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3418, 2293, 1885
Rint0.023
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.594
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.040, 0.111, 1.03
No. of reflections2293
No. of parameters209
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.34, 0.32

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2007), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N12.016 (2)Cu1—N32.016 (2)
Cu1—N1i2.016 (2)Cu1—O12.678 (2)
Cu1—N3i2.016 (2)
N1—Cu1—N1i180.00 (16)N1—Cu1—N382.24 (10)
N1i—Cu1—N3i82.24 (10)N1—Cu1—O190.17 (9)
N1i—Cu1—N397.76 (10)N1i—Cu1—O189.83 (9)
N1—Cu1—N3i97.76 (10)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O1ii0.861.942.745 (4)154.5
N4—H4···F1iii0.862.262.874 (4)128.1
N4—H4···O1ii0.862.403.127 (4)142.2
Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y+1, z+1; (iii) x1, y, z.
 

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Keystone Basic Research Program (973 Program) under grant No. 2007CB310408, No. 2006CB302901 and the Funding Project for Academic Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning Under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality. It was also supported by the State Key Laboratory of Functional Materials for Informatics, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

References

First citationAminou, M., Gerard, A. A. & Willem, L. D. (2004). Polyhedron, 23, 1969–1973.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2007). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationBurrows, A. D. (2004). Struct. Bond. 108, 55–96.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDai, Y. C., Zhou, L. L., Zhang, Y. Y. & Jin, Q. H. (2009). Chin. Inorg. Chem. 25, 2202–2206.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationDing, B. B., Weng, Y. Q., Mao, Z. W., Lam, C. K., Chen, X. M. & Ye, B. H. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 8836–8845.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationGruia, L. M., Rochon, F. D. & Beauchamp, A. L. (2007). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 360, 1825–1840.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationJin, Q. H., Zhou, L. L., Xu, L. J., Zhang, Y.-Y. & Lu, X. M. (2010). Polyhedron, 29, 317–327.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationTao, J., Zhang, Y. & Chen, X. M. (2002). Chem. Commun. pp. 1342–1343.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationYang, L. N., Li, J., Liu, J. J., Jiao, H. & Zhang, P. X. (2008). J. Baoji Univ. Arts Sci. (Natur. Sci.), 28, 28–32.  Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds