inorganic compounds
Redetermination of Fe2[BP3O12]
aDepartment of Physics and Chemistry, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: lifeifei@hpu.edu.cn
Explorations of phases in the quaternary FeIII–BIII–PV–O system prepared by the high temperature solution growth (HTSG) method led to single-crystal growth of anhydrous diiron(III) borotriphosphate, Fe2[BP3O12]. This phase has been synthesized previously as a microcrystalline material and its structure refined in P3 from powder X-ray diffraction data using the [Chen et al. (2004). J. Inorg. Mater. 19, 429-432]. In the current single-crystal study, it was shown that the correct is P63/m. The three-dimensional structure of the title compound is built up from FeO6 octahedra (3.. symmetry), trigonal–planar BO3 groups ( symmetry) and PO4 tetrahedra (m.. symmetry). Two FeO6 octahedra form Fe2O9 dimers via face-sharing, while the anionic BO3 and PO4 groups are connected via corner-sharing to build up the [BP3O12]6− anion. Both units are interconnected via corner-sharing.
Related literature
Reviews on the crystal chemistry of borophosphates were given by Kniep et al. (1998) and Ewald et al. (2007). For the previous powder study of Fe2[BP3O12], see: Chen et al. (2004). For the structure of a related borophosphate, see: Zhao et al. (2009). Meisel et al. (2004) have reported the structure of V2[BP3O12] and Mi et al. (2000) that of Cr2[BP3O12].
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004); cell CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2004); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810029818/wm2377sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810029818/wm2377Isup2.hkl
Single crystals of Fe2[BP3O12] have been prepared by the high temperature solution growth (HTSG) method in air. A powder mixture of Fe2O3, B2O3 and NaPO3 at the molar ratio of Fe: B: Na: P = 1:5:10:10 was first ground in an agate mortar and then transferred to a platinum crucible. The sample was gradually heated in air at 1173 K for 24 h. In this stage, the reagents were completely melted. After that, the intermediate product was slowly cooled to 673 K at the rate of 2 K h-1 and then quenched to room temperature. The obtained crystals were light-red and of prismatic shape. The dimensions of the used sample were typical for the grown crystals in this batch.
Chen et al. (2004) have refined the structure of Fe2[BP3O12] using the Rietved method from powder X-ray data and determined the 3 (7.16), P63 (7.56), P63/m (1.75). So we selected the latter to solve the structure. The final converged with satisfactory results (R1(gt) = 0.0348). Furthermore, the final refined model was checked with the ADDSYM algorithm using the program PLATON (Spek, 2009), and no higher symmetry was found. Hence, our final structure model is considered to be reasonable and corrects the previous model by Chen et al. (2004).
to be P3, in analogy with the chromium compound Cr2[BP3012] (Mi et al., 2000). However, in our study we determined the structure from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data in the centrosymmetric P63/m. In the progress of the determination using XPREP (Sheldrick, 2008), the mean |E*E-1| statistics gave a value of 0.948 revealing that the structure is centrosymmetric; the CFOM (combined figure-of-merit) value for each determination were P3 (16.06), PThe highest peak in the difference
is located at a distance of 1.41 Å from the Fe1 site while the deepest hole is at a distance of 0.83 Å from the same site.The systematic development of borophosphates has led to a broad spectrum of new borophosphate compounds with quite different anionic partial structures, such as oligomeric units, chains, ribbons, layers, and three-dimensional frameworks. (Kniep et al., 1998; Ewald et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2009).
Most of the borophosphate compounds were synthesized under hydrothermal conditions; hence, their structures usually incorporate water molecules, hydroxy groups or organic templates. There are considerably less anhydrous borophosphate compounds known, which might have better chemical and thermal stability than the hydrous or templated phases to ensure the feasibility of industrial applications. Herein, we report the redetermined structure of the anhydrous diiron(III) borotriphosphate, Fe2[BP3O12].
The basic building units of the three-dimensional structure of the title compound are FeO6 octahedra (3.. symmetry), trigonal-planar BO3 groups (6 symmetry) and PO4 tetrahedra (m.. symmetry) (Fig. 1). Two neighboring FeO6 octahedra are connected via their faces to form Fe2O9 dimers. Trigonal-planar BO3 units and PO4 tetrahedra are isolated. Each BO3 triangle connects three PO4 tetrahedra via corner-sharing O atoms and each PO4 connects three Fe2O9 groups and one BO3 group also via corner sharing. As shown in Fig. 2, the aforementioned groups are interconnected to form the three-dimensional framework of the title compound. Chen et al. (2004) have previously refined the structure of Fe2[BP3O12] in P3 using the The analogous chromium compound Cr2[BP3O12] (Mi et al., 2000) is isotypic to this structure model. The differences between the previous and the current model are discussed in the Section. The three-dimensional frameworks of Cr2[BP3O12] (space group P3) and our model of Fe2[BP3O12] (space group P63/m) are very similar, and the differences mainly lie in the distortion of the MO6 octahedra (M = Cr, Fe). The of Cr2[BP3O12] consists of four Cr atoms, and the Cr–O bond distances range from 1.88 (2) to 2.07 (2) Å, while there is only one Fe site in the of Fe2[BP3O12] with Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.929 (2) to 2.103 (2) Å. Based on the current findings, a change from P3 to P63/m seems to be most likely for the Cr compound but has to be evidenced experimentally. Meisel et al. (2004) have reported the analogous vanadium(III) compound V2[BP3O12] in P63/m, but with a tripled (a of the V compound ≈ 31/2 × a of the Fe and Cr compounds). However, a comparison of the three structures shows very similar frameworks.
Reviews on the crystal chemistry of borophosphates were given by Kniep et al. (1998) and Ewald et al. (2007). For the previous powder study of Fe2[BP3O12], see: Chen et al. (2004). For the structure of a related borophosphate, see: Zhao et al. (2009). Meisel et al. (2004) have reported the structure of V2[BP3O12] and Mi et al. (2000) that of Cr2[BP3O12].
Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004); cell
CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2004); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).Fe2[BP3O12] | Dx = 3.263 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 407.42 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hexagonal, P63/m | Cell parameters from 1049 reflections |
Hall symbol: -P 6c | θ = 4.0–27.4° |
a = 8.0347 (8) Å | µ = 4.15 mm−1 |
c = 7.4163 (13) Å | T = 293 K |
V = 414.63 (9) Å3 | Prism, light-red |
Z = 2 | 0.15 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm |
F(000) = 396 |
Rigaku Mercury70 CCD diffractometer | 345 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 338 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite Monochromator monochromator | Rint = 0.042 |
Detector resolution: 14.6306 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 2.9° |
ω scans | h = −10→10 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) | k = −10→10 |
Tmin = 0.575, Tmax = 0.819 | l = −9→6 |
3247 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | 0 restraints |
Least-squares matrix: full | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
wR(F2) = 0.072 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0168P)2 + 3.P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.07 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
345 reflections | Δρmax = 0.58 e Å−3 |
33 parameters | Δρmin = −0.78 e Å−3 |
Fe2[BP3O12] | Z = 2 |
Mr = 407.42 | Mo Kα radiation |
Hexagonal, P63/m | µ = 4.15 mm−1 |
a = 8.0347 (8) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 7.4163 (13) Å | 0.15 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm |
V = 414.63 (9) Å3 |
Rigaku Mercury70 CCD diffractometer | 345 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) | 338 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.575, Tmax = 0.819 | Rint = 0.042 |
3247 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035 | 33 parameters |
wR(F2) = 0.072 | 0 restraints |
S = 1.07 | Δρmax = 0.58 e Å−3 |
345 reflections | Δρmin = −0.78 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Fe1 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | 0.45190 (12) | 0.0072 (3) | |
P1 | 1.04513 (17) | 0.68473 (17) | 0.2500 | 0.0064 (3) | |
O2 | 0.8735 (5) | 0.4782 (5) | 0.2500 | 0.0080 (7) | |
O1 | 0.9428 (5) | 0.8099 (5) | 0.2500 | 0.0097 (8) | |
B1 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.2500 | 0.0101 (19) | |
O3 | 1.1626 (3) | 0.7289 (3) | 0.4200 (4) | 0.0115 (6) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Fe1 | 0.0076 (3) | 0.0076 (3) | 0.0063 (5) | 0.00381 (15) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
P1 | 0.0055 (6) | 0.0057 (6) | 0.0077 (7) | 0.0025 (5) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O2 | 0.0067 (15) | 0.0059 (16) | 0.0099 (19) | 0.0021 (13) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0060 (16) | 0.0056 (16) | 0.017 (2) | 0.0022 (13) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
B1 | 0.008 (2) | 0.008 (2) | 0.014 (5) | 0.0040 (12) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O3 | 0.0116 (12) | 0.0115 (12) | 0.0127 (15) | 0.0066 (10) | −0.0045 (11) | −0.0019 (10) |
Fe1—O3i | 1.929 (2) | P1—O2 | 1.538 (3) |
Fe1—O3ii | 1.929 (2) | P1—O1 | 1.586 (3) |
Fe1—O3iii | 1.929 (2) | O2—Fe1iv | 2.103 (2) |
Fe1—O2iv | 2.103 (2) | O1—B1 | 1.357 (3) |
Fe1—O2 | 2.103 (2) | B1—O1vii | 1.357 (3) |
Fe1—O2v | 2.103 (2) | B1—O1viii | 1.357 (3) |
P1—O3 | 1.507 (3) | O3—Fe1i | 1.929 (2) |
P1—O3vi | 1.507 (3) | ||
O3i—Fe1—O3ii | 97.83 (11) | O3—P1—O3vi | 113.6 (2) |
O3i—Fe1—O3iii | 97.83 (11) | O3—P1—O2 | 111.85 (12) |
O3ii—Fe1—O3iii | 97.83 (11) | O3vi—P1—O2 | 111.85 (12) |
O3i—Fe1—O2iv | 93.65 (11) | O3—P1—O1 | 108.24 (12) |
O3ii—Fe1—O2iv | 91.53 (11) | O3vi—P1—O1 | 108.24 (12) |
O3iii—Fe1—O2iv | 164.04 (11) | O2—P1—O1 | 102.37 (18) |
O3i—Fe1—O2 | 91.53 (11) | P1—O2—Fe1 | 129.13 (10) |
O3ii—Fe1—O2 | 164.04 (11) | P1—O2—Fe1iv | 129.14 (10) |
O3iii—Fe1—O2 | 93.65 (11) | Fe1—O2—Fe1iv | 90.78 (13) |
O2iv—Fe1—O2 | 74.92 (10) | B1—O1—P1 | 136.3 (3) |
O3i—Fe1—O2v | 164.04 (11) | O1vii—B1—O1viii | 120.000 (1) |
O3ii—Fe1—O2v | 93.65 (11) | O1vii—B1—O1 | 120.000 (1) |
O3iii—Fe1—O2v | 91.53 (11) | O1viii—B1—O1 | 120.000 (1) |
O2iv—Fe1—O2v | 74.92 (10) | P1—O3—Fe1i | 142.54 (17) |
O2—Fe1—O2v | 74.92 (10) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x−y, x−1, −z+1; (iii) y, −x+y+1, −z+1; (iv) −x+y+1, −x+1, −z+1/2; (v) −y+1, x−y, z; (vi) x, y, −z+1/2; (vii) −y+2, x−y+1, z; (viii) −x+y+1, −x+2, −z+1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | Fe2[BP3O12] |
Mr | 407.42 |
Crystal system, space group | Hexagonal, P63/m |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, c (Å) | 8.0347 (8), 7.4163 (13) |
V (Å3) | 414.63 (9) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 4.15 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.15 × 0.05 × 0.05 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Rigaku Mercury70 CCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.575, 0.819 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3247, 345, 338 |
Rint | 0.042 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.648 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.035, 0.072, 1.07 |
No. of reflections | 345 |
No. of parameters | 33 |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.58, −0.78 |
Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2004), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
Fe1—O3i | 1.929 (2) | P1—O2 | 1.538 (3) |
Fe1—O2 | 2.103 (2) | P1—O1 | 1.586 (3) |
P1—O3 | 1.507 (3) | O1—B1 | 1.357 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1. |
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Doctoral Foundation of Henan Polytechnic University (B648174).
References
Brandenburg, K. (2004). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Chen, H. H., Ge, M. H., Yang, X. X., Mi, J. X. & Zhao, J. T. (2004). J. Inorg. Mater. 19, 429–432. CAS Google Scholar
Ewald, B., Huang, Y. X. & Kniep, R. (2007). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 633, 1517–1540. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Higashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar
Kniep, R., Engelhardt, H. & Hauf, C. (1998). Chem. Mater. 10, 2930–2934. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Meisel, M., Päch, M., Wilde, L. & Wulff-Molder, D. (2004). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 630, 983–985. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mi, J. X., Zhao, J. T., Mao, S. Y., Huang, Y. X., Engelhardt, H. & Kniep, R. (2000). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 215, 201–202. CAS Google Scholar
Rigaku (2004). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zhao, D., Cheng, W. D., Zhang, H., Huang, S. P., Xie, Z., Zhang, W. L. & Yang, S. L. (2009). Inorg. Chem. 48, 6623–6629. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The systematic development of borophosphates has led to a broad spectrum of new borophosphate compounds with quite different anionic partial structures, such as oligomeric units, chains, ribbons, layers, and three-dimensional frameworks. (Kniep et al., 1998; Ewald et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2009).
Most of the borophosphate compounds were synthesized under hydrothermal conditions; hence, their structures usually incorporate water molecules, hydroxy groups or organic templates. There are considerably less anhydrous borophosphate compounds known, which might have better chemical and thermal stability than the hydrous or templated phases to ensure the feasibility of industrial applications. Herein, we report the redetermined structure of the anhydrous diiron(III) borotriphosphate, Fe2[BP3O12].
The basic building units of the three-dimensional structure of the title compound are FeO6 octahedra (3.. symmetry), trigonal-planar BO3 groups (6 symmetry) and PO4 tetrahedra (m.. symmetry) (Fig. 1). Two neighboring FeO6 octahedra are connected via their faces to form Fe2O9 dimers. Trigonal-planar BO3 units and PO4 tetrahedra are isolated. Each BO3 triangle connects three PO4 tetrahedra via corner-sharing O atoms and each PO4 connects three Fe2O9 groups and one BO3 group also via corner sharing. As shown in Fig. 2, the aforementioned groups are interconnected to form the three-dimensional framework of the title compound. Chen et al. (2004) have previously refined the structure of Fe2[BP3O12] in space group P3 using the Rietveld method. The analogous chromium compound Cr2[BP3O12] (Mi et al., 2000) is isotypic to this structure model. The differences between the previous and the current model are discussed in the Refinement Section. The three-dimensional frameworks of Cr2[BP3O12] (space group P3) and our model of Fe2[BP3O12] (space group P63/m) are very similar, and the differences mainly lie in the distortion of the MO6 octahedra (M = Cr, Fe). The asymmetric unit of Cr2[BP3O12] consists of four Cr atoms, and the Cr–O bond distances range from 1.88 (2) to 2.07 (2) Å, while there is only one Fe site in the asymmetric unit of Fe2[BP3O12] with Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.929 (2) to 2.103 (2) Å. Based on the current findings, a space group change from P3 to P63/m seems to be most likely for the Cr compound but has to be evidenced experimentally. Meisel et al. (2004) have reported the analogous vanadium(III) compound V2[BP3O12] in space group P63/m, but with a tripled unit cell (a of the V compound ≈ 31/2 × a of the Fe and Cr compounds). However, a comparison of the three structures shows very similar frameworks.