metal-organic compounds
Poly[[tetrakis(μ2-pyrazine N,N′-dioxide-κ2O:O′)neodymium(III)] tris(perchlorate)]
aAllegheny College, 520 North Main St., Meadville, PA 16335, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: jknaust@allegheny.edu
The title three-dimensional coordination network, {[Nd(C4H4N2O2)4](ClO4)3}n, is isostructural to that of other lanthanides. The Nd+3 cation lies on a fourfold roto-inversion axis. It is coordinated in a distorted square-antiprismatic fashion by eight O atoms from bridging pyrazine N,N′-dioxide ligands. There are two unique pyrazine N,N′-dioxide ligands. One ring is located around an inversion center, and there is a twofold rotation axis at the center of the other ring. There are also two unique perchlorate anions. One is centered on a twofold rotation axis and the other on a fourfold roto-inversion axis. The perchlorate anions are located in channels that run perpendicular to (001) and (110) and interact with the coordination network through C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.
Related literature
For the isostructural La, Ce, Pr, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb and Y coordination networks, see: Sun et al. (2004). For the isostructural Dy, Ho, Er coordination networks, see: Quinn-Elmore et al. (2010); Buchner et al. (2010a,b), respectively. For a lanthanum 4,4′-bipyridine N,N′-dioxide coordination network of similar topology, see: Long et al. (2001). For additional discussions on Ln3+ (Ln = lanthanide) coordination networks with aromatic N,N′-dioxide ligands, see: Cardoso et al. (2001); Hill et al. (2005). For background information on the applications of coordination networks, see: Roswell & Yaghi (2004); Rosi et al. (2003); Seo et al. (2000).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007); cell SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: X-SEED.
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810031818/zl2298sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810031818/zl2298Isup2.hkl
Pyrazine N,N'-dioxide (0.025 g, 0.223 mmol) was dissolved in deionized water (1.5 ml) and methanol (1.5 ml). An aqueous solution of Nd(ClO4)3 (0.240 ml of a 0.1167 M solution, 0.028 mmol) was diluted with methanol (0.760 ml) and CH2Cl2 (2.5 ml). The pyrazine N,N'-dioxide solution was layered over the Nd(ClO4)3 solution, and the two solutions were allowed to slowly mix. Rose colored block-like crystals formed upon the slow evaporation of the resultant solution.
All H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model with C—H = 0.95 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2 times Ueq(C).
The synthesis of lanthanide coordination networks has been of recent interest due to the potential of the flexible coordination sphere of the Ln+3 metal ions to produce coordination networks with new, unusual, or high connectivity topologies (Hill et al. 2005, Long et al. 2001, and Sun et al. 2004). Coordination networks with both a high connectivity topology and an open framework have potential for applications in areas such as absorption, ion exchange, or catalysis (Roswell et al. 2004, Rosi et al. 2003, and Seo et al. 2000). Aromatic N,N'-dioxide ligands have been attractive candidates for use with Ln+3 cations as the O-donor atoms of the ligand are complementary to the hard acid character of the lanthanide cations (Cardoso et al. 2001, Hill et al. 2005, Long et al. 2001, and Sun et al. 2004).
The description of the structure of the title compound is part of a series of consecutive papers on three-dimensional coordination networks of the type {[Ln(C4H4N2O2)4](ClO4)3}n, with Ln = Nd (this publication), Dy (Quinn-Elmore et al. 2010), Ho (Buchner et al. 2010a) and Er (Buchner et al. 2010b), respectively. All four compounds are also isostructural to the previously reported La, Ce, Pr, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb and Y coordination networks (Sun et al. 2004).
The
of the title compound contains one quarter of a Nd+3 cation, half of two coordinated pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands, a quarter of one perchlorate anion, and a half of another perchlorate anion (Figure 1). The Nd+3 cation lies on a fourfold roto-inversion axis. One ligand (O1, N1, C1, C2) is located around an inversion center, and there is a twofold rotation axis at the center of the other (O2, N2, C3, C4). Both chlorine atoms of the perchlorate anions lie on special positions. Cl1 lies on a fourfold roto-inversion axis, and Cl2 is located on a twofold rotation axis. The high atomic displacement parameters for O4 and O5 bonded to Cl2, and the residual electron density around Cl2 indicate that this perchlorate anion is disordered; however, the disorder does not appear discreet. Only O4 and O5 are easily found in positions that agree with the of the anion, therefore only one position was modeled.The Nd+3 cation is coordinated in a distorted square anti-prismatic fashion by eight O atoms from bridging pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands forming a three-dimensional coordination network. The network topology is similar to that which is seen in {[La(4,4'-bipyridine N,N'-dioxide)4](CF3SO3)3 .4.2CH3OH}n in that in can be considered as being composed of two sets of intersecting (4,4) nets (Long et al. 2001). The nets are perpendicular to one another, but they are canted. One set of nets lies parallel to the (1 0 0) plane, and the other set lies parallel to the (0 1 0) plane (Figure 2).
The title compound forms five unique C—H···O hydrogen bonds (Figure 3). There are two unique hydrogen bonds between pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands and another three hydrogen bonds between the perchlorate anions and pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands. The non-disordered perchlorate anion (Cl1 and O3) forms two unique hydrogen bonds with pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands resulting in a total of eight hydrogen bonds per ion with the network, but the disordered perchlorate (Cl2, O4, and O5) forms only one unique hydrogen bond with pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands resulting in a total of only two hydrogen bonds per ion with the network. As seen in the packing diagrams, the perchlorate anions are located in two sets of channels (Figures 4 and 5). In channels that run perpendicular to the (0 0 1) plane only anions containing Cl2 are present. (Figure 4), but in the channels that run perpendiclar to the (1 1 0) plane the anions containing Cl1 and Cl2 alternate (Figure 5).
For the isostructural La, Ce, Pr, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb and Y coordination networks, see: Sun et al. (2004). For the isostructural Dy, Ho, Er coordination networks, see: Quinn-Elmore et al. (2010); Buchner et al. (2010a,b), respectively. For a lanthanum 4,4'-bipyridine N,N'-dioxide coordination network of similar topology, see: Long et al. (2001). For additional discussions on Ln+3 coordination networks with aromatic N,N'-dioxide ligands, see: Cardoso et al. (2001); Hill et al. (2005). For background information on the applications of coordination networks, see: Roswell et al. (2004); Rosi et al. (2003); Seo et al. (2000).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007); cell
SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001).[Nd(C4H4N2O2)4](ClO4)3 | Dx = 2.177 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 890.96 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Tetragonal, I41/acd | Cell parameters from 15053 reflections |
Hall symbol: -I 4bd 2c | θ = 2.6–30.5° |
a = 15.3804 (4) Å | µ = 2.32 mm−1 |
c = 22.9843 (12) Å | T = 100 K |
V = 5437.1 (3) Å3 | Block, rose |
Z = 8 | 0.23 × 0.23 × 0.18 mm |
F(000) = 3512 |
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer | 2086 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1842 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.024 |
ω scans | θmax = 30.5°, θmin = 2.6° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001) | h = −21→21 |
Tmin = 0.593, Tmax = 0.659 | k = −21→21 |
30711 measured reflections | l = −32→32 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.106 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.10 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0535P)2 + 38.356P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2086 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
110 parameters | Δρmax = 2.27 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −1.95 e Å−3 |
[Nd(C4H4N2O2)4](ClO4)3 | Z = 8 |
Mr = 890.96 | Mo Kα radiation |
Tetragonal, I41/acd | µ = 2.32 mm−1 |
a = 15.3804 (4) Å | T = 100 K |
c = 22.9843 (12) Å | 0.23 × 0.23 × 0.18 mm |
V = 5437.1 (3) Å3 |
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer | 2086 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001) | 1842 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.593, Tmax = 0.659 | Rint = 0.024 |
30711 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.106 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.10 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0535P)2 + 38.356P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2086 reflections | Δρmax = 2.27 e Å−3 |
110 parameters | Δρmin = −1.95 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Nd1 | 0.5000 | 0.2500 | 0.3750 | 0.00589 (11) | |
Cl1 | 0.5000 | 0.2500 | 0.1250 | 0.0119 (3) | |
Cl2 | 0.72544 (6) | −0.02456 (6) | 0.1250 | 0.0319 (3) | |
O1 | 0.59191 (12) | 0.21965 (14) | 0.29303 (8) | 0.0171 (4) | |
O2 | 0.53338 (14) | 0.39686 (12) | 0.34324 (8) | 0.0168 (4) | |
O3 | 0.57573 (16) | 0.24613 (16) | 0.16135 (10) | 0.0277 (5) | |
O4 | 0.6477 (5) | −0.0172 (6) | 0.1497 (5) | 0.191 (4) | |
O5 | 0.7895 (5) | −0.0023 (6) | 0.1623 (5) | 0.180 (5) | |
N1 | 0.66963 (15) | 0.23449 (15) | 0.27293 (10) | 0.0141 (4) | |
N2 | 0.52833 (15) | 0.44642 (14) | 0.29745 (9) | 0.0129 (4) | |
C1 | 0.70832 (17) | 0.17377 (17) | 0.23897 (11) | 0.0154 (5) | |
H1 | 0.6797 | 0.1202 | 0.2315 | 0.018* | |
C2 | 0.78886 (16) | 0.18959 (17) | 0.21540 (11) | 0.0152 (5) | |
H2 | 0.8155 | 0.1475 | 0.1910 | 0.018* | |
C3 | 0.52715 (18) | 0.41238 (16) | 0.24314 (11) | 0.0148 (5) | |
H3 | 0.5264 | 0.3511 | 0.2380 | 0.018* | |
C4 | 0.52702 (18) | 0.46617 (16) | 0.19547 (11) | 0.0147 (5) | |
H4 | 0.5260 | 0.4420 | 0.1574 | 0.018* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Nd1 | 0.00627 (13) | 0.00627 (13) | 0.00511 (16) | −0.00034 (7) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Cl1 | 0.0146 (4) | 0.0146 (4) | 0.0065 (6) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Cl2 | 0.0304 (4) | 0.0304 (4) | 0.0349 (6) | −0.0118 (5) | 0.0035 (3) | −0.0035 (3) |
O1 | 0.0112 (8) | 0.0256 (10) | 0.0146 (8) | −0.0032 (7) | 0.0052 (7) | −0.0036 (7) |
O2 | 0.0283 (10) | 0.0114 (8) | 0.0107 (8) | −0.0031 (7) | −0.0038 (7) | 0.0049 (6) |
O3 | 0.0195 (11) | 0.0479 (15) | 0.0156 (10) | 0.0057 (9) | −0.0054 (8) | −0.0033 (8) |
O4 | 0.085 (5) | 0.154 (7) | 0.335 (12) | −0.015 (4) | 0.138 (7) | −0.028 (7) |
O5 | 0.091 (5) | 0.130 (6) | 0.317 (15) | 0.007 (4) | −0.066 (7) | −0.135 (8) |
N1 | 0.0116 (10) | 0.0198 (10) | 0.0110 (9) | −0.0011 (8) | 0.0022 (8) | −0.0013 (8) |
N2 | 0.0160 (10) | 0.0117 (9) | 0.0111 (9) | 0.0000 (8) | −0.0017 (7) | 0.0028 (7) |
C1 | 0.0149 (11) | 0.0172 (11) | 0.0140 (11) | −0.0008 (9) | 0.0023 (8) | −0.0029 (9) |
C2 | 0.0135 (11) | 0.0188 (12) | 0.0132 (10) | 0.0000 (9) | 0.0013 (8) | −0.0027 (9) |
C3 | 0.0206 (12) | 0.0104 (10) | 0.0134 (11) | −0.0018 (9) | −0.0019 (9) | 0.0006 (8) |
C4 | 0.0209 (12) | 0.0114 (10) | 0.0118 (10) | −0.0002 (9) | −0.0002 (9) | 0.0006 (8) |
Nd1—O1i | 2.4012 (18) | Cl2—O5vi | 1.350 (7) |
Nd1—O1ii | 2.4012 (18) | O1—N1 | 1.302 (3) |
Nd1—O1 | 2.4012 (18) | O2—N2 | 1.302 (3) |
Nd1—O1iii | 2.4012 (18) | N1—C1 | 1.355 (3) |
Nd1—O2i | 2.4286 (18) | N1—C2vii | 1.358 (3) |
Nd1—O2ii | 2.4286 (18) | N2—C3 | 1.354 (3) |
Nd1—O2 | 2.4286 (18) | N2—C4viii | 1.354 (3) |
Nd1—O2iii | 2.4287 (18) | C1—C2 | 1.374 (3) |
Cl1—O3 | 1.435 (2) | C1—H1 | 0.9500 |
Cl1—O3iv | 1.435 (2) | C2—N1vii | 1.358 (3) |
Cl1—O3iii | 1.435 (2) | C2—H2 | 0.9500 |
Cl1—O3v | 1.435 (2) | C3—C4 | 1.373 (3) |
Cl2—O4vi | 1.328 (5) | C3—H3 | 0.9500 |
Cl2—O4 | 1.328 (5) | C4—N2viii | 1.354 (3) |
Cl2—O5 | 1.350 (7) | C4—H4 | 0.9500 |
O1i—Nd1—O1ii | 76.62 (10) | O3iv—Cl1—O3iii | 109.83 (10) |
O1i—Nd1—O1 | 147.62 (10) | O3—Cl1—O3v | 109.83 (10) |
O1ii—Nd1—O1 | 112.75 (10) | O3iv—Cl1—O3v | 108.76 (19) |
O1i—Nd1—O1iii | 112.75 (10) | O3iii—Cl1—O3v | 109.83 (10) |
O1ii—Nd1—O1iii | 147.62 (10) | O4vi—Cl2—O4 | 109.6 (8) |
O1—Nd1—O1iii | 76.63 (10) | O4vi—Cl2—O5 | 115.9 (6) |
O1i—Nd1—O2i | 79.66 (7) | O4—Cl2—O5 | 111.4 (7) |
O1ii—Nd1—O2i | 73.01 (7) | O4vi—Cl2—O5vi | 111.4 (7) |
O1—Nd1—O2i | 74.30 (6) | O4—Cl2—O5vi | 115.9 (6) |
O1iii—Nd1—O2i | 137.92 (6) | O5—Cl2—O5vi | 91.8 (11) |
O1i—Nd1—O2ii | 73.01 (7) | N1—O1—Nd1 | 141.71 (16) |
O1ii—Nd1—O2ii | 79.66 (7) | N2—O2—Nd1 | 140.80 (15) |
O1—Nd1—O2ii | 137.92 (6) | O1—N1—C1 | 119.1 (2) |
O1iii—Nd1—O2ii | 74.30 (6) | O1—N1—C2vii | 120.8 (2) |
O2i—Nd1—O2ii | 145.02 (9) | C1—N1—C2vii | 120.0 (2) |
O1i—Nd1—O2 | 74.30 (6) | O2—N2—C3 | 121.3 (2) |
O1ii—Nd1—O2 | 137.92 (6) | O2—N2—C4viii | 119.0 (2) |
O1—Nd1—O2 | 79.66 (7) | C3—N2—C4viii | 119.7 (2) |
O1iii—Nd1—O2 | 73.01 (7) | N1—C1—C2 | 120.1 (2) |
O2i—Nd1—O2 | 72.37 (10) | N1—C1—H1 | 120.0 |
O2ii—Nd1—O2 | 118.92 (10) | C2—C1—H1 | 120.0 |
O1i—Nd1—O2iii | 137.92 (6) | N1vii—C2—C1 | 119.9 (2) |
O1ii—Nd1—O2iii | 74.30 (6) | N1vii—C2—H2 | 120.1 |
O1—Nd1—O2iii | 73.01 (7) | C1—C2—H2 | 120.1 |
O1iii—Nd1—O2iii | 79.66 (7) | N2—C3—C4 | 120.2 (2) |
O2i—Nd1—O2iii | 118.92 (10) | N2—C3—H3 | 119.9 |
O2ii—Nd1—O2iii | 72.37 (10) | C4—C3—H3 | 119.9 |
O2—Nd1—O2iii | 145.02 (9) | N2viii—C4—C3 | 120.1 (2) |
O3—Cl1—O3iv | 109.83 (10) | N2viii—C4—H4 | 119.9 |
O3—Cl1—O3iii | 108.76 (19) | C3—C4—H4 | 119.9 |
Symmetry codes: (i) y+1/4, x−1/4, −z+3/4; (ii) −y+3/4, −x+3/4, −z+3/4; (iii) −x+1, −y+1/2, z; (iv) −y+3/4, x−1/4, −z+1/4; (v) y+1/4, −x+3/4, −z+1/4; (vi) y+3/4, x−3/4, −z+1/4; (vii) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, −z+1/2; (viii) x, −y+1, −z+1/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C2—H2···O2vii | 0.95 | 2.55 | 3.326 (3) | 139 |
C2—H2···O5 | 0.95 | 2.43 | 3.194 (7) | 137 |
C3—H3···O1 | 0.95 | 2.59 | 3.331 (3) | 135 |
C3—H3···O3 | 0.95 | 2.51 | 3.260 (3) | 136 |
C4—H4···O3iv | 0.95 | 2.41 | 3.289 (3) | 154 |
Symmetry codes: (iv) −y+3/4, x−1/4, −z+1/4; (vii) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, −z+1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Nd(C4H4N2O2)4](ClO4)3 |
Mr | 890.96 |
Crystal system, space group | Tetragonal, I41/acd |
Temperature (K) | 100 |
a, c (Å) | 15.3804 (4), 22.9843 (12) |
V (Å3) | 5437.1 (3) |
Z | 8 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 2.32 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.23 × 0.23 × 0.18 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART APEX CCD |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.593, 0.659 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 30711, 2086, 1842 |
Rint | 0.024 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.715 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.038, 0.106, 1.10 |
No. of reflections | 2086 |
No. of parameters | 110 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0535P)2 + 38.356P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 | |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 2.27, −1.95 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2007), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), X-SEED (Barbour, 2001).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C2—H2···O2i | 0.95 | 2.55 | 3.326 (3) | 139.3 |
C2—H2···O5 | 0.95 | 2.43 | 3.194 (7) | 137.4 |
C3—H3···O1 | 0.95 | 2.59 | 3.331 (3) | 135.2 |
C3—H3···O3 | 0.95 | 2.51 | 3.260 (3) | 136.3 |
C4—H4···O3ii | 0.95 | 2.41 | 3.289 (3) | 153.6 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −y+3/4, x−1/4, −z+1/4. |
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Allegheny College for providing funding in support of this research. The diffractometer was funded by the NSF (grant No. 0087210), the Ohio Board of Regents (grant No. CAP-491) and by Youngstown State University. The authors would like to acknowledge Youngstown State University and the STaRBURSTT CyberInstrumentation Consortium for assistance with the crystallography.
References
Barbour, L. J. (2001). J. Supramol. Chem. 1, 189–191. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bruker (2001). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bruker (2007). SMART and SAINT-Plus. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Buchner, J. D., Quinn-Elmore, B. G., Beach, K. B. & Knaust, J. M. (2010a). Acta Cryst. E66, m1108–m1109. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Buchner, J. D., Quinn-Elmore, B. G., Beach, K. B. & Knaust, J. M. (2010b). Acta Cryst. E66, m1110–m1111. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Cardoso, M. C. C., Zinner, L. B., Zukerman-Scheptor, J., Araújo Melo, D. M. & Vincentini, G. J. (2001). J. Alloys Compd, 323–324, 22–25. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hill, R. J., Long, D. L., Champness, N. R., Hubberstry, P. & Schröder, M. (2005). Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 335–348. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Long, D. L., Blake, A. J., Champness, N. R., Wilson, C. & Schröder, M. (2001). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 2444–2447. CAS Google Scholar
Quinn-Elmore, B. G., Buchner, J. D., Beach, K. B. & Knaust, J. M. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m1106–m1107. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rosi, N. L., Eckert, J., Eddaoudi, M., Vodak, D. T., Kim, J., O'Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. (2003). Science, 300, 1127–1129. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Roswell, J. L. C. & Yaghi, O. M. (2004). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 73, 3–14. Google Scholar
Seo, J. S., Whang, D., Lee, H., un, S. I., Oh, J., Jin Jeon, Y. J. & Kim, K. (2000). Nature (London), 404, 982–986. PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sun, H. L., Gao, S., Ma, B. Q., Chang, F. & Fu, W. F. (2004). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 73, 89–95. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The synthesis of lanthanide coordination networks has been of recent interest due to the potential of the flexible coordination sphere of the Ln+3 metal ions to produce coordination networks with new, unusual, or high connectivity topologies (Hill et al. 2005, Long et al. 2001, and Sun et al. 2004). Coordination networks with both a high connectivity topology and an open framework have potential for applications in areas such as absorption, ion exchange, or catalysis (Roswell et al. 2004, Rosi et al. 2003, and Seo et al. 2000). Aromatic N,N'-dioxide ligands have been attractive candidates for use with Ln+3 cations as the O-donor atoms of the ligand are complementary to the hard acid character of the lanthanide cations (Cardoso et al. 2001, Hill et al. 2005, Long et al. 2001, and Sun et al. 2004).
The description of the structure of the title compound is part of a series of consecutive papers on three-dimensional coordination networks of the type {[Ln(C4H4N2O2)4](ClO4)3}n, with Ln = Nd (this publication), Dy (Quinn-Elmore et al. 2010), Ho (Buchner et al. 2010a) and Er (Buchner et al. 2010b), respectively. All four compounds are also isostructural to the previously reported La, Ce, Pr, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb and Y coordination networks (Sun et al. 2004).
The asymmetric unit of the title compound contains one quarter of a Nd+3 cation, half of two coordinated pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands, a quarter of one perchlorate anion, and a half of another perchlorate anion (Figure 1). The Nd+3 cation lies on a fourfold roto-inversion axis. One ligand (O1, N1, C1, C2) is located around an inversion center, and there is a twofold rotation axis at the center of the other (O2, N2, C3, C4). Both chlorine atoms of the perchlorate anions lie on special positions. Cl1 lies on a fourfold roto-inversion axis, and Cl2 is located on a twofold rotation axis. The high atomic displacement parameters for O4 and O5 bonded to Cl2, and the residual electron density around Cl2 indicate that this perchlorate anion is disordered; however, the disorder does not appear discreet. Only O4 and O5 are easily found in positions that agree with the site symmetry of the anion, therefore only one position was modeled.
The Nd+3 cation is coordinated in a distorted square anti-prismatic fashion by eight O atoms from bridging pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands forming a three-dimensional coordination network. The network topology is similar to that which is seen in {[La(4,4'-bipyridine N,N'-dioxide)4](CF3SO3)3 .4.2CH3OH}n in that in can be considered as being composed of two sets of intersecting (4,4) nets (Long et al. 2001). The nets are perpendicular to one another, but they are canted. One set of nets lies parallel to the (1 0 0) plane, and the other set lies parallel to the (0 1 0) plane (Figure 2).
The title compound forms five unique C—H···O hydrogen bonds (Figure 3). There are two unique hydrogen bonds between pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands and another three hydrogen bonds between the perchlorate anions and pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands. The non-disordered perchlorate anion (Cl1 and O3) forms two unique hydrogen bonds with pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands resulting in a total of eight hydrogen bonds per ion with the network, but the disordered perchlorate (Cl2, O4, and O5) forms only one unique hydrogen bond with pyrazine N,N'-dioxide ligands resulting in a total of only two hydrogen bonds per ion with the network. As seen in the packing diagrams, the perchlorate anions are located in two sets of channels (Figures 4 and 5). In channels that run perpendicular to the (0 0 1) plane only anions containing Cl2 are present. (Figure 4), but in the channels that run perpendiclar to the (1 1 0) plane the anions containing Cl1 and Cl2 alternate (Figure 5).