metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Poly[[μ10-2,3-bis­(carboxymethyl)butanedioato]disodium]

aState Key Laboratory Base of Novel Functional Materials and Preparation Science, Center of Applied Solid State Chemistry Research, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315211, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: Zhuhonglin1@nbu.edu.cn

(Received 8 October 2010; accepted 12 October 2010; online 20 October 2010)

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [Na2(C8H8O8)]n, contains one Na+ ion and half of a 2,3-bis(carboxymethyl)butanedioate (H2BTC2−) dianion, which lies on a center of symmetry. The dianion exhibits a μ10-bridging mode. Each Na atom lies in a NaO6 octa­hedron defined by six O atoms from five dianions. Adjacent NaO6 octa­hedra share a common O—O edge, generating a biocta­hedron; adjacent biocta­hedra are O—O edge-connected to one another, building up a chain along [001]. The chains are connected by adjacent H2BTC2− anions into a three-dimensional framework. The structure is further stabilized by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Related literature

For related structures, see: Delgado et al. (2007[Delgado, L. C., Fabelo, O., Pasàn, J., Delgado, F. S., Lloret, F., Julve, M. & Ruiz-Pérez, C. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 7458-7465.]); Liu et al. (2008[Liu, Y. Y., Ma, J. F., Yang, J., Ma, J. C. & Su, Z. M. (2008). CrystEngComm, 10, 894-904.]); Wang et al. (2005[Wang, M. S., Guo, G. C., Fu, M. L., Xu, L., Cai, L. Z. & Huang, J. S. (2005). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 2899-2907.]); Zheng et al. (2004[Zheng, Y. Q., Lin, J. L. & Kong, Z. P. (2004). Inorg. Chem. 43, 2590-2596.]); Zhu & Zheng (2010[Zhu, H. L. & Zheng, Y. Q. (2010). J. Mol. Struct. 970, 27-35.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • [Na2(C8H8O8)]

  • Mr = 278.12

  • Orthorhombic, P b c n

  • a = 8.9053 (18) Å

  • b = 8.6395 (17) Å

  • c = 12.527 (3) Å

  • V = 963.8 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.24 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.44 × 0.36 × 0.32 mm

Data collection
  • Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995[Higashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.]) Tmin = 0.900, Tmax = 0.925

  • 8610 measured reflections

  • 1097 independent reflections

  • 1000 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.021

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038

  • wR(F2) = 0.111

  • S = 1.10

  • 1097 reflections

  • 86 parameters

  • 1 restraint

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.43 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2C⋯O4i 0.85 (2) 1.67 (3) 2.5097 (18) 177 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) [-x+{\script{5\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, z+{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998[Rigaku (1998). RAPID-AUTO. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.]); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004[Rigaku/MSC (2004). CrystalStructure. Rigaku/MSC Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

Recently, the aliphatic multi-carboxylic acids have attractived considerable attention due to both its conformational flexibility and a variety of coordination fashions (Wang et al., 2005; Zheng et al., 2004).The butane-1,2,3,4-tetracarboxylic acid (H4BTC) ligand possesses four ionizable protons that can be removed gradually to form a series of deprotonated anions such as H3BTC-, H2BTC2-, HBTC3-, BTC4-, which have allowed the preparation of a variety of complexes with differents metals (Delgado et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2008; Zhu et al., 2010). In this contribution, we report the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound.

The asymmetric unit of the title compound contains one Na+ ion and half a H2BTC2- anion(Figure 1). The H2BTC2-ligand is diprotonated, which is crystallographically imposed by symmetry of center with inversion centers at the midpoints of the central C3—C3i bond with the Wyckoff 4b site. Each H2BTC2- anions coordinate ten sodium ions through eight carboxyl oxygen atoms. The carboxylate group and carboxylic group all coordinates to two metal atoms in a syn/anti µ2η2 bridging fashion, and two seven-membered chelating rings are concomitantly formed. Each Na atom is in a distorted octahedra NaO6 gemetry defined by six O atoms from five H2BTC2- ligands, the Na—O contact distances are all within the normal ranges. The adjacent two NaO6 octahedra are fused via common edge O1—O1 and O3—O3, generating a one-dimensional sodium-oxide chains (Figure 2), and the resulting chains are further interlinked by H2BTC2- anions into three-dimensional frameworks (Figure 3).

Related literature top

For related structures, see: Delgado et al. (2007); Liu et al. (2008); Wang et al. (2005); Zheng et al. (2004); Zhu & Zheng (2010).

Experimental top

All chemicals were obtained from commerical sources and were used as obtained. NaOH (0.079 g, 1.98 mmol) was added to a stirred mixture solution of butane-1,2,3,4-tetracarboxylic acid (0.1173 g, 0.50 mmol) in 10 ml H2O and 10 ml me thanol, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 5 min. Colorless crystals were obtained from the solution (pH = 7.13) after standing at room temperature for five weeks.

Refinement top

H atoms bonded to C atoms were palced in geometrically calculated position and were refined using a riding model, with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C). H atoms attached to O atoms were found in a difference Fourier synthesis and refined with the O—H distance restranied to 0.83 (1) Å.

Structure description top

Recently, the aliphatic multi-carboxylic acids have attractived considerable attention due to both its conformational flexibility and a variety of coordination fashions (Wang et al., 2005; Zheng et al., 2004).The butane-1,2,3,4-tetracarboxylic acid (H4BTC) ligand possesses four ionizable protons that can be removed gradually to form a series of deprotonated anions such as H3BTC-, H2BTC2-, HBTC3-, BTC4-, which have allowed the preparation of a variety of complexes with differents metals (Delgado et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2008; Zhu et al., 2010). In this contribution, we report the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound.

The asymmetric unit of the title compound contains one Na+ ion and half a H2BTC2- anion(Figure 1). The H2BTC2-ligand is diprotonated, which is crystallographically imposed by symmetry of center with inversion centers at the midpoints of the central C3—C3i bond with the Wyckoff 4b site. Each H2BTC2- anions coordinate ten sodium ions through eight carboxyl oxygen atoms. The carboxylate group and carboxylic group all coordinates to two metal atoms in a syn/anti µ2η2 bridging fashion, and two seven-membered chelating rings are concomitantly formed. Each Na atom is in a distorted octahedra NaO6 gemetry defined by six O atoms from five H2BTC2- ligands, the Na—O contact distances are all within the normal ranges. The adjacent two NaO6 octahedra are fused via common edge O1—O1 and O3—O3, generating a one-dimensional sodium-oxide chains (Figure 2), and the resulting chains are further interlinked by H2BTC2- anions into three-dimensional frameworks (Figure 3).

For related structures, see: Delgado et al. (2007); Liu et al. (2008); Wang et al. (2005); Zheng et al. (2004); Zhu & Zheng (2010).

Computing details top

Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The content of asymmetric unit showing the atomic numbering and 45% probability dispalcement ellipsoids.[Symmetry codes: (i) -x + 2, -y + 1, -z + 1. (ii) -x + 2, -y, -z + 1. (iii) -x + 2, y, -z + 1.5. (iv) x - 1/2,y - 1/2, -z + 1.5. (v) x - 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 1.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The one-dimensional sodium-oxide chains with the common edges O1—O1 and O3—O3.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The three-dimensional metal-organic framework in the title compound.
Poly[[µ10-2,3-bis(carboxymethyl)butanedioato]disodium] top
Crystal data top
[Na2(C8H8O8)]F(000) = 568
Mr = 278.12Dx = 1.917 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcnMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2n 2abCell parameters from 7116 reflections
a = 8.9053 (18) Åθ = 3.3–27.4°
b = 8.6395 (17) ŵ = 0.24 mm1
c = 12.527 (3) ÅT = 293 K
V = 963.8 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.44 × 0.36 × 0.32 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID
diffractometer
1097 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1000 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 3.3°
ω scanh = 1111
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)
k = 1111
Tmin = 0.900, Tmax = 0.925l = 1616
8610 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.111H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0658P)2 + 0.5154P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1097 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
86 parametersΔρmax = 0.43 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = 0.22 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Na2(C8H8O8)]V = 963.8 (3) Å3
Mr = 278.12Z = 4
Orthorhombic, PbcnMo Kα radiation
a = 8.9053 (18) ŵ = 0.24 mm1
b = 8.6395 (17) ÅT = 293 K
c = 12.527 (3) Å0.44 × 0.36 × 0.32 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID
diffractometer
1097 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)
1000 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.900, Tmax = 0.925Rint = 0.021
8610 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0381 restraint
wR(F2) = 0.111H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.43 e Å3
1097 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.22 e Å3
86 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Na0.91916 (8)0.06655 (8)0.62976 (5)0.0292 (2)
O11.12521 (17)0.21959 (14)0.69249 (10)0.0391 (4)
O21.30500 (16)0.37558 (13)0.75029 (10)0.0325 (3)
C11.19167 (19)0.34236 (18)0.68752 (12)0.0243 (3)
C21.15019 (18)0.46906 (17)0.61037 (11)0.0219 (3)
H2A1.23860.49630.56920.026*
H2B1.12070.55980.65080.026*
C31.02287 (16)0.42768 (14)0.53277 (10)0.0161 (3)
H3A0.93580.39270.57410.019*
C41.07185 (16)0.29671 (16)0.45770 (11)0.0177 (3)
O31.01257 (15)0.16760 (12)0.46431 (9)0.0300 (3)
O41.17325 (15)0.33112 (14)0.39020 (10)0.0300 (3)
H2C1.310 (4)0.308 (3)0.7989 (19)0.088 (11)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Na0.0336 (4)0.0244 (4)0.0296 (4)0.0038 (3)0.0023 (3)0.0031 (2)
O10.0481 (8)0.0278 (7)0.0415 (7)0.0062 (6)0.0172 (6)0.0104 (5)
O20.0432 (7)0.0262 (6)0.0282 (6)0.0011 (5)0.0177 (5)0.0041 (5)
C10.0305 (8)0.0216 (7)0.0208 (7)0.0046 (6)0.0054 (6)0.0007 (5)
C20.0278 (7)0.0185 (7)0.0194 (7)0.0020 (6)0.0054 (6)0.0003 (5)
C30.0208 (7)0.0137 (6)0.0138 (6)0.0032 (5)0.0005 (5)0.0002 (5)
C40.0212 (7)0.0160 (6)0.0159 (6)0.0039 (5)0.0012 (5)0.0008 (5)
O30.0448 (7)0.0166 (5)0.0286 (6)0.0050 (5)0.0081 (5)0.0041 (4)
O40.0340 (6)0.0247 (6)0.0314 (6)0.0026 (5)0.0148 (5)0.0082 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Na—O4i2.3748 (15)O2—H2C0.843 (10)
Na—O12.3943 (15)C1—C21.506 (2)
Na—O32.3978 (13)C2—C31.536 (2)
Na—O3ii2.4188 (13)C2—H2A0.9700
Na—O2iii2.4522 (14)C2—H2B0.9700
Na—O1iv2.6196 (15)C3—C41.5346 (18)
Na—Naiv3.3388 (14)C3—C3vi1.550 (2)
Na—Naii3.7369 (14)C3—H3A0.9800
O1—C11.216 (2)C4—O31.2368 (18)
O1—Naiv2.6196 (15)C4—O41.2723 (19)
O2—C11.311 (2)O3—Naii2.4188 (13)
O2—Nav2.4522 (14)O4—Navii2.3748 (15)
O4i—Na—O1122.39 (5)C1—O1—Na146.90 (11)
O4i—Na—O395.36 (5)C1—O1—Naiv123.86 (11)
O1—Na—O379.44 (5)Na—O1—Naiv83.38 (5)
O4i—Na—O3ii119.46 (5)C1—O2—Nav146.49 (11)
O1—Na—O3ii115.41 (6)C1—O2—H2C109 (2)
O3—Na—O3ii78.24 (5)Nav—O2—H2C90 (2)
O4i—Na—O2iii86.14 (5)O1—C1—O2122.32 (14)
O1—Na—O2iii119.22 (5)O1—C1—C2123.18 (14)
O3—Na—O2iii156.69 (5)O2—C1—C2114.49 (14)
O3ii—Na—O2iii80.80 (5)C1—C2—C3114.71 (13)
O4i—Na—O1iv76.26 (5)C1—C2—H2A108.6
O1—Na—O1iv63.76 (7)C3—C2—H2A108.6
O3—Na—O1iv127.10 (5)C1—C2—H2B108.6
O3ii—Na—O1iv150.95 (5)C3—C2—H2B108.6
O2iii—Na—O1iv75.89 (5)H2A—C2—H2B107.6
O4i—Na—Naiv119.52 (4)C4—C3—C2110.47 (11)
O1—Na—Naiv51.20 (4)C4—C3—C3vi110.16 (13)
O3—Na—Naiv129.07 (5)C2—C3—C3vi109.98 (14)
O3ii—Na—Naiv109.34 (4)C4—C3—H3A108.7
O2iii—Na—Naiv68.03 (4)C2—C3—H3A108.7
O1iv—Na—Naiv45.42 (3)C3vi—C3—H3A108.7
O4i—Na—Naii112.22 (4)O3—C4—O4123.93 (13)
O1—Na—Naii99.22 (5)O3—C4—C3120.17 (12)
O3—Na—Naii39.32 (3)O4—C4—C3115.89 (12)
O3ii—Na—Naii38.92 (3)C4—O3—Na122.30 (9)
O2iii—Na—Naii119.06 (4)C4—O3—Naii127.90 (10)
O1iv—Na—Naii162.35 (5)Na—O3—Naii101.76 (5)
Naiv—Na—Naii128.23 (4)C4—O4—Navii144.24 (11)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (ii) x+2, y, z+1; (iii) x1/2, y1/2, z+3/2; (iv) x+2, y, z+3/2; (v) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (vi) x+2, y+1, z+1; (vii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2C···O4viii0.85 (2)1.67 (3)2.5097 (18)177 (2)
Symmetry code: (viii) x+5/2, y+1/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Na2(C8H8O8)]
Mr278.12
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pbcn
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)8.9053 (18), 8.6395 (17), 12.527 (3)
V3)963.8 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.24
Crystal size (mm)0.44 × 0.36 × 0.32
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku R-AXIS RAPID
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)
Tmin, Tmax0.900, 0.925
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
8610, 1097, 1000
Rint0.021
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.648
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.038, 0.111, 1.10
No. of reflections1097
No. of parameters86
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.43, 0.22

Computer programs: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998), CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2C···O4i0.85 (2)1.67 (3)2.5097 (18)177 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x+5/2, y+1/2, z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 20072022), the Expert Project of Key Basic Research of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grant No. 2003CCA00800), the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (grant No. 2006 C21105) and the Education Department of Zhejiang Province. Thanks are also extended to the K. C. Wong Magna Fund of Ningbo University.

References

First citationDelgado, L. C., Fabelo, O., Pasàn, J., Delgado, F. S., Lloret, F., Julve, M. & Ruiz-Pérez, C. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 7458–7465.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
First citationHigashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.  Google Scholar
First citationLiu, Y. Y., Ma, J. F., Yang, J., Ma, J. C. & Su, Z. M. (2008). CrystEngComm, 10, 894–904.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRigaku (1998). RAPID-AUTO. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.  Google Scholar
First citationRigaku/MSC (2004). CrystalStructure. Rigaku/MSC Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWang, M. S., Guo, G. C., Fu, M. L., Xu, L., Cai, L. Z. & Huang, J. S. (2005). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 2899–2907.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationZheng, Y. Q., Lin, J. L. & Kong, Z. P. (2004). Inorg. Chem. 43, 2590–2596.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationZhu, H. L. & Zheng, Y. Q. (2010). J. Mol. Struct. 970, 27–35.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds