organic compounds
Butane-1,4-diammonium bis(perchlorate)
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa
*Correspondence e-mail: carderne@uj.ac.za
The butane-1,4-diammonium cation of the title compound, C4H14N22+·2ClO4−, lies on a special position of 2/m, whereas the perchlorate anion is located on a crystallographic mirror plane. An intricate three-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network exists in the with each H atom of the ammonium group exhibiting bifurcated interactions to the perchlorate anion. Complex hydrogen-bonded ring and chain motifs are also evident, in particular a 50-membered ring with graph-set notation R1010(50) is identified.
Related literature
For related structural studies of butane-1,4-diammonium salts, see: van Blerk & Kruger (2007); Lemmerer & Billing (2006); Gabro et al. (2009). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2008; data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536811012025/bt5503sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811012025/bt5503Isup2.hkl
The title compound was prepared by adding butane-1,4-diamine (0.50 g, 5.67 mmol) to 30% perchloric acid (HClO4, 2 ml, 9.138 mmol, Merck) in a sample vial. The mixture was then refluxed at 363 K for 2 h. The solution was cooled at 2 K h-1 to room temperature. Colourless crystals of butane-1,4-diammonium diperchlorate were collected and a suitable single-crystal was selected for the X-ray diffraction study.
Hydrogen atoms could be identified from the difference Fourier map but once these atoms were refined, their distances from the parent atoms were found to be significantly shorter than the ideal distances for C—H and N—H respectively. The H-atoms were therefore geometrically positioned and refined in the riding-model approximation, with C—H = 0.97 Å, N—H = 0.89 Å, and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(N). The highest peak in the final difference map is 0.69Å from O2 and the deepest hole is 0.69Å from Cl1.
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2008; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2008; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006).; software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).C4H14N22+·2ClO4− | F(000) = 300 |
Mr = 289.07 | Dx = 1.653 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/m | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2y | Cell parameters from 1622 reflections |
a = 19.4755 (10) Å | θ = 3.8–28.2° |
b = 5.6210 (3) Å | µ = 0.59 mm−1 |
c = 5.3470 (2) Å | T = 296 K |
β = 97.222 (3)° | Block, colourless |
V = 580.70 (5) Å3 | 0.50 × 0.34 × 0.16 mm |
Z = 2 |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 793 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 694 reflections with I > 2s(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.028 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 3.8° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (AX-Scale; Bruker, 2008) | h = −23→25 |
Tmin = 0.757, Tmax = 0.912 | k = −7→7 |
3067 measured reflections | l = −6→7 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.155 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.17 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0955P)2 + 0.3477P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
793 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
46 parameters | Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.44 e Å−3 |
C4H14N22+·2ClO4− | V = 580.70 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 289.07 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, C2/m | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 19.4755 (10) Å | µ = 0.59 mm−1 |
b = 5.6210 (3) Å | T = 296 K |
c = 5.3470 (2) Å | 0.50 × 0.34 × 0.16 mm |
β = 97.222 (3)° |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 793 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (AX-Scale; Bruker, 2008) | 694 reflections with I > 2s(I) |
Tmin = 0.757, Tmax = 0.912 | Rint = 0.028 |
3067 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.155 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.17 | Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3 |
793 reflections | Δρmin = −0.44 e Å−3 |
46 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.57860 (17) | 0.0000 | 0.7538 (6) | 0.0466 (8) | |
H1 | 0.5661 | 0.1394 | 0.8450 | 0.056* | |
C2 | 0.53822 (16) | 0.0000 | 0.4976 (6) | 0.0467 (8) | |
H2 | 0.5508 | −0.1394 | 0.4065 | 0.056* | |
Cl1 | 0.65841 (4) | 0.5000 | 0.27016 (13) | 0.0403 (3) | |
N1 | 0.65459 (14) | 0.0000 | 0.7476 (5) | 0.0450 (7) | |
H1N | 0.6762 | 0.0000 | 0.9045 | 0.068* | |
H2N | 0.6666 | 0.1293 | 0.6673 | 0.068* | |
O1 | 0.69616 (13) | 0.2898 (5) | 0.2214 (5) | 0.0755 (7) | |
O2 | 0.59205 (16) | 0.5000 | 0.1238 (6) | 0.0698 (9) | |
O3 | 0.65031 (17) | 0.5000 | 0.5341 (5) | 0.0633 (8) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0461 (18) | 0.061 (2) | 0.0321 (15) | 0.000 | 0.0021 (12) | 0.000 |
C2 | 0.0403 (18) | 0.068 (2) | 0.0315 (15) | 0.000 | 0.0028 (12) | 0.000 |
Cl1 | 0.0480 (5) | 0.0380 (5) | 0.0344 (5) | 0.000 | 0.0031 (3) | 0.000 |
N1 | 0.0425 (15) | 0.0501 (17) | 0.0398 (14) | 0.000 | −0.0049 (11) | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0818 (14) | 0.0697 (16) | 0.0730 (14) | 0.0253 (12) | 0.0014 (11) | −0.0236 (11) |
O2 | 0.0619 (18) | 0.069 (2) | 0.071 (2) | 0.000 | −0.0187 (14) | 0.000 |
O3 | 0.095 (2) | 0.0596 (17) | 0.0377 (14) | 0.000 | 0.0171 (13) | 0.000 |
C1—N1 | 1.484 (4) | Cl1—O1 | 1.433 (2) |
C1—C2 | 1.492 (4) | Cl1—O1ii | 1.433 (2) |
C1—H1 | 0.9700 | Cl1—O3 | 1.440 (3) |
C2—C2i | 1.492 (6) | N1—H1N | 0.8900 |
C2—H2 | 0.9700 | N1—H2N | 0.8900 |
Cl1—O2 | 1.424 (3) | ||
N1—C1—C2 | 113.0 (3) | O2—Cl1—O1ii | 110.54 (12) |
N1—C1—H1 | 109.0 | O1—Cl1—O1ii | 111.1 (2) |
C2—C1—H1 | 109.0 | O2—Cl1—O3 | 109.6 (2) |
H1—C1—H1iii | 107.8 | O1—Cl1—O3 | 107.48 (13) |
C1—C2—C2i | 113.3 (3) | O1ii—Cl1—O3 | 107.48 (13) |
C1—C2—H2 | 108.9 | C1—N1—H1N | 109.5 |
C2i—C2—H2 | 108.9 | C1—N1—H2N | 109.5 |
H2—C2—H2iii | 107.7 | H1N—N1—H2N | 109.5 |
O2—Cl1—O1 | 110.54 (12) | ||
N1—C1—C2—C2i | 180.0 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (ii) x, −y+1, z; (iii) x, −y, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1N···O1iv | 0.89 | 2.35 | 3.035 (3) | 134 |
N1—H1N···O1v | 0.89 | 2.35 | 3.035 (3) | 134 |
N1—H2N···O1 | 0.89 | 2.68 | 3.435 (4) | 143 |
N1—H2N···O3 | 0.89 | 2.21 | 3.0308 (14) | 153 |
Symmetry codes: (iv) x, y, z+1; (v) x, −y, z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C4H14N22+·2ClO4− |
Mr | 289.07 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/m |
Temperature (K) | 296 |
a, b, c (Å) | 19.4755 (10), 5.6210 (3), 5.3470 (2) |
β (°) | 97.222 (3) |
V (Å3) | 580.70 (5) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.59 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.50 × 0.34 × 0.16 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (AX-Scale; Bruker, 2008) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.757, 0.912 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2s(I)] reflections | 3067, 793, 694 |
Rint | 0.028 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.668 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.056, 0.155, 1.17 |
No. of reflections | 793 |
No. of parameters | 46 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.47, −0.44 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008), SAINT (Bruker, 2008, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), X-SEED (Barbour, 2001) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006)., publCIF (Westrip, 2010) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1N···O1i | 0.89 | 2.35 | 3.035 (3) | 134 |
N1—H1N···O1ii | 0.89 | 2.35 | 3.035 (3) | 134 |
N1—H2N···O1 | 0.89 | 2.68 | 3.435 (4) | 143 |
N1—H2N···O3 | 0.89 | 2.21 | 3.0308 (14) | 153 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) x, −y, z+1. |
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the National Research Foundation Thuthuka programme (GUN 66314) and the University of Johannesburg for funding and facilities for this study.
References
Barbour, L. J. (2001). J. Supramol. Chem. 1, 189–191. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Blerk, C. van & Kruger, G. J. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o342–o344. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bruker (2008). AXScale, APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Gabro, M., Lalancette, R. A. & Bernal, I. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o1352. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lemmerer, A. & Billing, D. G. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o1954–o1956. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The crystal structure of the title compound (I) adds to our current ongoing studies of long-chained diammonium mineral acid salts. Colourless rectangular crystals of butane-1,4-diammonium diperchlorate were synthesized and formed part of our structural chemistry study of the inorganic mineral acid salts of butane-1,4-diamine.
The butane-1,4-diammonium cation lies over an inversion centre and a twofold rotation axis. It also straddles a crystallographic mirror plane. The asymmetric unit contains one-half of a perchlorate anion and one-half of the butane-1,4-diammonium cation. The hydrocarbon chain is also fully extended and is of necessity completely planar as it lies in the crystallographic mirror plane. The molecular structure of (I) is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 2 illustrates the packing arrangement of the title compound (I). Single stacked layers of cations pack together with perchlorate anions inserted between the cation chains in line with the ammonium groups showing a distinct inorganic - organic layering effect that is a common feature of these long-chained diammonium salts. An extensive three-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network is formed.
A close-up view of the hydrogen bonding interactions can be viewed in Figure 3 where very clear evidence of bifurcated interactions can be seen on each hydrogen atom of both ammonium groups. The hydrogen bond distances and angles for (I) can be found in Table 2.
Since the hydrogen bonding network is extremely intricate and complex, we focus on one particularly interesting hydrogen-bonding ring motif in the structure. Figure 4 shows a view of five diammonium cations and five perchlorate anions (viewed down the a axis) that are hydrogen bonded together to form a large, level 2, 50-membered ring motif with graph set notation R1010(50). Numerous other ring and chain motifs were identified with Mercury (Macrae et al.), but since the one in Figure 4 is the highest level motif obtainable in the structure, the other motifs of lower level are not depicted here.