organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

N,N′-Bis(3-methyl­phen­yl)succinamide dihydrate

aDepartment of Chemistry, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri 574 199, Mangalore, India, and bInstitute of Materials Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Petersenstrasse 23, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: gowdabt@yahoo.com

(Received 23 May 2011; accepted 31 May 2011; online 4 June 2011)

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C18H20N2O2·2H2O, contains half a mol­ecule with a center of symmetry at the mid-point of the central C—C bond. The N—H bonds in the amide fragments are anti to the meta-methyl groups in the adjacent benzene rings. The dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the NH—C(O)—CH2 segment in the two halves of the mol­ecule is 5.6 (4)°. In the crystal, the packing of mol­ecules through O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions leads to the formation of layers parallel to the bc plane. The methyl group is disordered with respect to the 3- and 5-positions of the benzene ring, with site-occupation factors of 0.910 (8) and 0.090 (8).

Related literature

For the study of the effect of substituents on the structures of N-(ar­yl)-amides, see: Gowda et al. (2000[Gowda, B. T., Paulus, H. & Fuess, H. (2000). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A, 55, 779-790.]); Saraswathi et al. (2011a[Saraswathi, B. S., Foro, S. & Gowda, B. T. (2011a). Acta Cryst. E67, o607.],b[Saraswathi, B. S., Foro, S. & Gowda, B. T. (2011b). Acta Cryst. E67, o966.]). For the effect of substituents on the structures of N-(ar­yl)methane­sulfonamides, see: Gowda et al. (2007[Gowda, B. T., Foro, S. & Fuess, H. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o2570.]). For similar structures, see: Pierrot et al. (1984[Pierrot, M., Baldy, A., Maire, J. C., Mehrotra, R. C., Kapoor, T. S. & Bachlas, B. P. (1984). Acta Cryst. C40, 1931-1934.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C18H20N2O2·2H2O

  • Mr = 332.39

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 13.401 (4) Å

  • b = 4.937 (2) Å

  • c = 14.446 (4) Å

  • β = 108.67 (3)°

  • V = 905.5 (5) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.09 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.48 × 0.12 × 0.04 mm

Data collection
  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.]) Tmin = 0.960, Tmax = 0.997

  • 2857 measured reflections

  • 1679 independent reflections

  • 797 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.064

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.126

  • wR(F2) = 0.159

  • S = 1.23

  • 1679 reflections

  • 123 parameters

  • 10 restraints

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯O2i 0.86 2.10 2.946 (6) 169
O2—H21⋯O2ii 0.82 2.08 2.836 (4) 153
O2—H22⋯O1 0.84 1.87 2.713 (5) 178
Symmetry codes: (i) [x, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (ii) [-x, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.]); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

The amide and sulfonamide moieties are important constituents of many biologically significant compounds. As a part of studying the substituent effects on the structures of this class of compounds (Gowda et al., 2000, 2007; Saraswathi et al., 2011a, b), in the present work, the structure of N,N-bis(3-methylphenyl)-succinamide dihydrate, (I), has been determined (Fig.1). The asymmetric unit of (I) contains half a molecule with a center of symmetry at the mid-point of the central C—C bond, similar to that observed in bis(2-chlorophenylaminocarbonylmethyl)disulfide, (II), (Pierrot et al., 1984), N,N-bis(2-methylphenyl)- succinamide, (III), (Saraswathi et al., 2011a) N,N- bis(3-chlorophenyl)-succinamide (IV) (Saraswathi et al., 2011b).

In the C—NH—C(O)—C segment, the amide O atom is anti to the H atoms attached to the adjacent C atom. The N—H bonds in the amide fragments are also anti to the meta-methyl groups in the adjacent benzene rings, similar to that observed with respect to the ortho-methyl groups in (III) and the meta-chloro groups in (IV).

The dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the NH—C(O)—CH2 segment in the two halves of the molecule is 5.6 (4)°, compared to the values of 62.1 (2)° in (III) and 32.8 (1)° in (IV). The striking difference may be due to the fact that the title compound is the dihydrate, i.e. is composed of the amide and lattice water molecules, which, unlike in other compounds, influence the molecular conformation through hydrogen bonding interactions.

The torsion angles of N1–C7–C8–C8a and O1–C7–C8–C8a in (I) are 175.9 (6)° and -5.3 (9)°, compared to the values of 150.9 (3)° and -30.5 (4)° in (III) and -175.4 (2)° and 5.9 (4)° in (IV). The differences in the torsion angles may be due to the steric hindrances caused by the different substituents.

Similarly, the torsion angles of C2—C1—N1—C7 and C6—C1—N1—C7 are 5.4 (9)° and -173.6 (6)°, compared to the values of -64.0 (4)° and 117.6 (3)° in (III) and -35.0 (3)° and 147.5 (2)° in (IV).

The crystal packing of (I), through N1—H1N···O2, O2—H21···O2 and O2—H22···O1 hydrogen bonding (Table 1), leads to the formation of layers parallel to the bc plane and is shown in Fig. 2.

Related literature top

For the study of the effect of substituents on the structures of N-(aryl)-amides, see: Gowda et al. (2000); Saraswathi et al. (2011a,b). For the effect of substituents on the structures of N-(aryl)-methanesulfonamides, see: Gowda et al. (2007). For similar structures, see: Pierrot et al. (1984).

Experimental top

Succinic anhydride (0.01 mol) in toluene (25 ml) was treated dropwise with m-toluidine (0.01 mol) also in toluene (20 ml) with constant stirring. The resulting mixture was stirred for one hour and set aside for an additional hour at room temperature for completion of the reaction. The mixture was then treated with dilute hydrochloric acid to remove unreacted m-toluidine. The resultant N-(3-methylphenyl)succinamic acid was filtered under suction and washed thoroughly with water to remove the unreacted succinic anhydride and succinic acid. The compound was recrystallized to a constant melting point from ethanol. The purity of the compound was checked by elemental analysis and characterized by its infrared and NMR spectra.

The N-(3-methylphenyl)succinamic acid obtained was then treated with phosphorous oxychloride and excess of m-toluidine at room temperature with constant stirring. The resultant mixture was stirred for 4 h, kept aside for additional 6 h for completion of the reaction and poured slowly into crushed ice with constant stirring. It was kept aside for a day. The resultant solid, N,N-bis(3-methylphenyl)-succinamide dihydrate, was filtered under sucction, washed thoroughly with water, dilute sodium hydroxide solution and finally with water. It was recrystallized to a constant melting point from a mixture of acetone and chloroform. The purity of the compound was checked by elemental analysis, and characterized by its infrared and NMR spectra.

Needle-like colorless single crystals used in the X-ray diffraction studies were grown in a mixture of acetone and chloroform at room temperature.

Refinement top

The H atom of the NH group was located in a difference map and later restrained to the distance N—H = 0.86 (2) Å. The stucture was modelled with stoichiometric chemical composition applying an approximation of full occupancy of H5 and no corresponding partly occupied hydrogen atom at C3. The C9'H3 group in an alternative orientation was idealized and refined using a AFIX 3 (positional optimization of the entire group only by translation, no rotations) in SHELXL. The Uij components of C9' were assumed to be identical with that of C5 (EADP C5 C9') and were restrained to approximate isotropic behaviour. Atom C9 was refined using a split model. The corresponding site-occupation factors were refined so that their sum was unity [0.910 (8) and 0.090 (8)]. A DELU restraint was used for all Uij. The water molecule was refined as a rigid group with respect to x,y,z and its orientation (AFIX 6). The other H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry using a riding model with the aromatic C—H = 0.93 Å, the methyl C—H = 0.96 Å and the methylene C—H = 0.97 Å. Uiso(H) values of the methyl group and the water molecule were set at 1.5 Ueq of the parent atom. The other H atoms were refined with isotropic displacement parameters (set to 1.2 times of the Ueq of the parent atom).

The crystals available for X-ray studies were of rather poor quality and weak scatterers at high theta value resulting in relatively high R values.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. The disordered methyl group at the 3 and 5 positions of the phenyl ring is shown with both orientations.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Molecular packing of the title compound with hydrogen bonding shown as dashed lines.
N,N'-Bis(3-methylphenyl)butane-1,4-diamide dihydrate top
Crystal data top
C18H20N2O2·2H2OF(000) = 356
Mr = 332.39Dx = 1.219 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 433 reflections
a = 13.401 (4) Åθ = 2.9–28.2°
b = 4.937 (2) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 14.446 (4) ÅT = 293 K
β = 108.67 (3)°Needle, colourless
V = 905.5 (5) Å30.48 × 0.12 × 0.04 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur
diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector
1679 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube797 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.064
Rotation method data acquisition using ω scansθmax = 25.7°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
h = 1016
Tmin = 0.960, Tmax = 0.997k = 64
2857 measured reflectionsl = 1717
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.126Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.159H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.23 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.P)2 + 1.5559P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1679 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.008
123 parametersΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
10 restraintsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
Crystal data top
C18H20N2O2·2H2OV = 905.5 (5) Å3
Mr = 332.39Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 13.401 (4) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
b = 4.937 (2) ÅT = 293 K
c = 14.446 (4) Å0.48 × 0.12 × 0.04 mm
β = 108.67 (3)°
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur
diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector
1679 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
797 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.960, Tmax = 0.997Rint = 0.064
2857 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.12610 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.159H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.23Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
1679 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
123 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
O10.1286 (3)0.1598 (8)0.4781 (2)0.0590 (12)
N10.1521 (3)0.1149 (9)0.6385 (3)0.0471 (13)
H1N0.13130.17910.68460.056*
C10.2292 (4)0.0896 (12)0.6675 (4)0.0467 (15)
C20.2784 (4)0.2019 (13)0.6062 (4)0.0582 (17)
H20.26140.14120.54210.070*
C30.3535 (5)0.4063 (13)0.6396 (6)0.0668 (19)
C40.3776 (5)0.4944 (14)0.7340 (6)0.076 (2)
H40.42810.62880.75720.091*
C50.3280 (5)0.3861 (15)0.7938 (6)0.081 (2)
H50.34390.45100.85740.098*
C60.2547 (5)0.1828 (13)0.7627 (4)0.0625 (18)
H60.22260.10860.80510.075*
C70.1061 (4)0.2251 (11)0.5504 (4)0.0408 (14)
C80.0227 (4)0.4323 (11)0.5484 (3)0.0407 (14)
H8A0.03370.34410.56550.049*
H8B0.05300.56910.59750.049*
C90.4042 (6)0.5247 (16)0.5729 (5)0.098 (3)0.910 (8)
H9A0.45380.39790.56240.147*0.910 (8)
H9B0.35160.56610.51160.147*0.910 (8)
H9C0.44030.68780.60100.147*0.910 (8)
C9'0.367 (4)0.529 (11)0.878 (4)0.041 (18)0.090 (8)
H9'A0.42000.65660.87500.061*0.090 (8)
H9'B0.39560.40780.93170.061*0.090 (8)
H9'C0.30800.62410.88610.061*0.090 (8)
O20.0524 (3)0.1884 (9)0.2803 (2)0.0583 (12)
H210.00460.30060.26190.087*
H220.07560.17470.34150.087*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.071 (3)0.067 (3)0.038 (2)0.022 (2)0.016 (2)0.002 (2)
N10.054 (3)0.047 (3)0.040 (3)0.010 (3)0.015 (2)0.002 (2)
C10.038 (3)0.038 (4)0.057 (4)0.006 (3)0.006 (3)0.005 (3)
C20.052 (4)0.055 (4)0.067 (4)0.000 (4)0.018 (3)0.002 (4)
C30.043 (4)0.053 (5)0.101 (6)0.005 (4)0.018 (4)0.003 (4)
C40.057 (5)0.056 (5)0.098 (6)0.010 (4)0.001 (4)0.020 (5)
C50.080 (6)0.070 (6)0.080 (5)0.009 (5)0.006 (4)0.023 (5)
C60.067 (4)0.058 (5)0.054 (4)0.007 (4)0.007 (3)0.009 (4)
C70.046 (4)0.035 (4)0.037 (3)0.004 (3)0.007 (3)0.000 (3)
C80.051 (3)0.035 (4)0.036 (3)0.006 (3)0.014 (3)0.001 (3)
C90.086 (6)0.099 (7)0.121 (7)0.037 (5)0.051 (5)0.005 (6)
C9'0.041 (18)0.040 (19)0.040 (18)0.000 (5)0.013 (7)0.001 (5)
O20.079 (3)0.062 (3)0.037 (2)0.012 (2)0.023 (2)0.008 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C71.219 (5)C6—H60.9300
N1—C71.340 (6)C7—C81.509 (6)
N1—C11.409 (6)C8—C8i1.492 (8)
N1—H1N0.8600C8—H8A0.9700
C1—C21.378 (7)C8—H8B0.9700
C1—C61.385 (7)C9—H9A0.9600
C2—C31.398 (8)C9—H9B0.9600
C2—H20.9300C9—H9C0.9600
C3—C41.368 (8)C9'—H9'A0.9600
C3—C91.466 (8)C9'—H9'B0.9600
C4—C51.358 (8)C9'—H9'C0.9600
C4—H40.9300O2—H210.8235
C5—C61.375 (8)O2—H220.8398
C5—H50.9300
C7—N1—C1130.1 (5)C1—C6—H6120.3
C7—N1—H1N115.0O1—C7—N1122.8 (5)
C1—N1—H1N115.0O1—C7—C8123.2 (5)
C2—C1—C6119.1 (6)N1—C7—C8114.0 (5)
C2—C1—N1123.6 (5)C8i—C8—C7113.5 (5)
C6—C1—N1117.2 (5)C8i—C8—H8A108.9
C1—C2—C3120.6 (6)C7—C8—H8A108.9
C1—C2—H2119.7C8i—C8—H8B108.9
C3—C2—H2119.7C7—C8—H8B108.9
C4—C3—C2119.2 (6)H8A—C8—H8B107.7
C4—C3—C9121.1 (7)C3—C9—H9A109.5
C2—C3—C9119.7 (7)C3—C9—H9B109.5
C5—C4—C3120.1 (7)H9A—C9—H9B109.5
C5—C4—H4119.9C3—C9—H9C109.5
C3—C4—H4119.9H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C4—C5—C6121.5 (7)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C4—C5—H5119.2H9'A—C9'—H9'B109.5
C6—C5—H5119.2H9'A—C9'—H9'C109.5
C5—C6—C1119.4 (6)H9'B—C9'—H9'C109.5
C5—C6—H6120.3H21—O2—H22112.4
C7—N1—C1—C25.4 (9)C3—C4—C5—C61.5 (11)
C7—N1—C1—C6173.6 (5)C4—C5—C6—C11.3 (10)
C6—C1—C2—C30.3 (8)C2—C1—C6—C50.4 (9)
N1—C1—C2—C3179.4 (5)N1—C1—C6—C5178.7 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C40.1 (9)C1—N1—C7—O11.5 (9)
C1—C2—C3—C9179.4 (6)C1—N1—C7—C8177.3 (5)
C2—C3—C4—C50.8 (10)O1—C7—C8—C8i5.3 (9)
C9—C3—C4—C5178.5 (7)N1—C7—C8—C8i175.9 (6)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O2ii0.862.102.946 (6)169
O2—H21···O2iii0.822.082.836 (4)153
O2—H22···O10.841.872.713 (5)178
Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC18H20N2O2·2H2O
Mr332.39
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)13.401 (4), 4.937 (2), 14.446 (4)
β (°) 108.67 (3)
V3)905.5 (5)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.48 × 0.12 × 0.04
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur
diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
Tmin, Tmax0.960, 0.997
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2857, 1679, 797
Rint0.064
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.609
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.126, 0.159, 1.23
No. of reflections1679
No. of parameters123
No. of restraints10
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.23, 0.23

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O2i0.862.102.946 (6)169.1
O2—H21···O2ii0.822.082.836 (4)152.7
O2—H22···O10.841.872.713 (5)177.6
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

BSS thanks the University Grants Commission, Government of India, New Delhi, for the award of a research fellowship under its faculty improvement program.

References

First citationGowda, B. T., Foro, S. & Fuess, H. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o2570.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGowda, B. T., Paulus, H. & Fuess, H. (2000). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A, 55, 779–790.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationOxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.  Google Scholar
First citationPierrot, M., Baldy, A., Maire, J. C., Mehrotra, R. C., Kapoor, T. S. & Bachlas, B. P. (1984). Acta Cryst. C40, 1931–1934.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSaraswathi, B. S., Foro, S. & Gowda, B. T. (2011a). Acta Cryst. E67, o607.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSaraswathi, B. S., Foro, S. & Gowda, B. T. (2011b). Acta Cryst. E67, o966.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds