organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
RETRACTED ARTICLE

This article has been retracted. To view the retraction notice, click here.

Retracted: Oxonium picrate

aTianmu College, ZheJiang A & F University, Lin'An 311300, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: jingaoyf@yahoo.cn

(Received 18 May 2011; accepted 10 June 2011; online 18 June 2011)

The title compound, H3O+·C6H2N3O7, consists of one picrate anion and one oxonium cation. The oxonium cation is located on a crystallographic twofold axis and both its H atoms are disordered, each over two symmetry-equivalent positions with occupancy ratios of 0.75. The picrate anions are also located on twofold axes bis­ecting the phenolate and p-nitro groups. ππ inter­actions between the rings of the picrates [centroid-to-centroid distances of 3.324 (2) Å] connect the anions to form stacks along the a-axis direction. The stacks are further joined together by the protonated water mol­ecules through hydrogen bonds to form two-dimensional sheets extending parallel to the ab plane. The sheets are stacked on top of each other along the c-axis direction and connected through C—H⋯O inter­actions between the CH groups of the benzene rings and the picrate nitro groups, with C⋯O distances of 3.450 (2) Å.

Related literature

For general background to organic salts of picric acid, see Jin et al. (2010[Jin, S. W., Zhang, W. B., Liu, L., Gao, H. F., Wang, D. Q., Chen, R. P. & Xu, X. L. (2010). J. Mol. Struct. 975, 128-136.]); Harrison et al. (2007[Harrison, W. T. A., Swamy, M. T., Nagaraja, P., Yathirajan, H. S. & Narayana, B. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o3892.]); Muthamizhchelvan et al. (2005[Muthamizhchelvan, C., Saminathan, K., Fraanje, J., Peschar, R. & Sivakamar, K. (2005). Anal. Sci. 21, x61-x62.]); Smith et al. (2004[Smith, G., Wermuth, U. D. & Healy, P. C. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, o1800-o1803.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • H3O+·C6H2N3O7

  • Mr = 247.13

  • Orthorhombic, I b c a

  • a = 7.1510 (6) Å

  • b = 19.80820 (18) Å

  • c = 13.50610 (12) Å

  • V = 1913.12 (16) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.16 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.45 × 0.34 × 0.31 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2002[Bruker (2002). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.936, Tmax = 0.951

  • 3842 measured reflections

  • 848 independent reflections

  • 654 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.044

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044

  • wR(F2) = 0.140

  • S = 1.12

  • 848 reflections

  • 89 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.41 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O5—H5B⋯O2i 0.91 (2) 2.17 (2) 3.061 (3) 166 (5)
O5—H5A⋯O1 0.92 (2) 1.93 (2) 2.848 (2) 172 (5)
C3—H3⋯O3ii 0.93 2.52 3.450 (2) 175
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (ii) [x, -y, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002[Bruker (2002). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002[Bruker (2002). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information


Comment top

It is well known that picric acid is used primarily to prepare explosives, and as an intermediate to manufacture dyes. As a strong organic acid, picric acid forms salts with many N-containing organic bases (Smith et al., 2004; Harrison et al., 2007; Muthamizhchelvan et al., 2005). As an extension of our study concerning organic salts based on picric acid (Jin et al., 2010), we herein report the crystal structure of oxonium picrate.

The single crystal of the title compound (Fig. 1) with the formula C6H5N3O8 was obtained by recrystallization of picric acid and 2-chloropyridine from a methanol solution. However the 2-chloropyridine molecules do not appear in the title compound. X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that in the title compound there are one protonated water molecule, and one picrate. The OH group of the picric acid is ionized and the proton is transferred to the water molecule. In the title compound all of the bond distances and angles are in the normal range. The oxonium cation is located on a crystallographic two-fold axis and both its H atoms are disordered over each two symmetry equivalent positions with occupancy rates of 0.75 each. The benzene ring of the picrate is almost planar. The ortho-nitro groups (N1—O2—O3, and N1A—O2A—O3A) deviate from the benzene ring plane and have a dihedral angle of 25.6 (2)° with the benzene plane, whereas the para-nitro group lies almost in the benzene plane [with a dihedral angle of 2.0 (1)° between the N2—O4—O4A group and the benzene ring]. These structural data are similar to those in other structurally described picrates (Muthamizhchelvan et al., 2005).

ππ Interactions between the phenyl rings of the picrates (with Cg–Cg distances of 3.324 (2) Å) connect the picrate anions to form stacks along the a axis direction. Within one stack molecules alternate and are arranged in an antiparallel fashion. The one-dimensional picrate stacks are further linked together by the oxonium ions to form a two-dimensional sheet structure when it is viewed from the c axis direction (Fig. 2). The sheets are further stacked along the c axis direction through CH—O interactions between CH of the benzene rings and the nitro groups of the picrates with C—O distances of 3.450 (2) Å to form a three-dimensional structure.

Related literature top

For general background on organic salts of picric acid, see Jin et al. (2010); Harrison et al. (2007); Muthamizhchelvan et al. (2005); Smith et al. (2004).

Experimental top

Crystals of oxonium picrate were formed by slow evaporation of its methanol solution at room temperature. Picric acid (23 mg, 0.10 mmol) was dissolved in 4 ml of methanol, and 2-chloropyridine (11 mg, 0.10 mmol) was added to the methanol solution. The solution was then filtered into a test tube and left standing at room temperature. After about one week yellow block crystals were obtained.

Refinement top

H atoms H5A and H5B bonded to the oxonium O atom were located in a difference Fourier map and refined isotropically. The oxonium cation is located on a crystallographic two-fold axis and both H5A and H5B are disordered over each two symmetry equivalent positions, and both have an occupancy of 0.75. Other H atoms were positioned geometrically with C—H = 0.93 Å for aromatic H atoms, and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of the title compound, showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. Symmetry code: (i) -x + 1/2, y, -z.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Two-dimensional sheet structure formed through hydrogen bonds which is viewed along the c axis direction. The blue dashed lines represent O—H···O and ππ interactions.
Oxonium 2,4,6-trinitrophenolate top
Crystal data top
H3O+·C6H2N3O7Dx = 1.716 Mg m3
Mr = 247.13Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, IbcaCell parameters from 1867 reflections
a = 7.1510 (6) Åθ = 1.5–25.0°
b = 19.80820 (18) ŵ = 0.16 mm1
c = 13.50610 (12) ÅT = 298 K
V = 1913.12 (16) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 80.45 × 0.34 × 0.31 mm
F(000) = 1008
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
848 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube654 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.044
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2002)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.936, Tmax = 0.951k = 2223
3842 measured reflectionsl = 166
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.140 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0677P)2 + 3.1011P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.12(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
848 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
89 parametersΔρmin = 0.41 e Å3
2 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.039 (4)
Crystal data top
H3O+·C6H2N3O7V = 1913.12 (16) Å3
Mr = 247.13Z = 8
Orthorhombic, IbcaMo Kα radiation
a = 7.1510 (6) ŵ = 0.16 mm1
b = 19.80820 (18) ÅT = 298 K
c = 13.50610 (12) Å0.45 × 0.34 × 0.31 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
848 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2002)
654 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.936, Tmax = 0.951Rint = 0.044
3842 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0442 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.140H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.12Δρmax = 0.21 e Å3
848 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.41 e Å3
89 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
N10.3838 (3)0.11353 (11)0.17214 (16)0.0328 (7)
N20.25000.09568 (15)0.00000.0361 (8)
O10.25000.18513 (12)0.00000.0369 (8)
O20.3327 (3)0.17048 (10)0.19325 (15)0.0502 (7)
O30.4947 (3)0.08131 (11)0.22328 (15)0.0497 (7)
O40.3100 (4)0.12491 (10)0.07276 (19)0.0630 (8)
O50.00000.25000.1338 (2)0.0489 (9)
H5A0.089 (6)0.233 (3)0.091 (3)0.073*0.75
H5B0.052 (7)0.279 (2)0.177 (3)0.073*0.75
C10.25000.12179 (17)0.00000.0270 (8)
C20.3107 (4)0.08102 (13)0.08289 (17)0.0270 (7)
C30.3134 (4)0.01147 (13)0.08305 (17)0.0286 (7)
H30.35690.01220.13780.034*
C40.25000.02233 (17)0.00000.0282 (8)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0376 (14)0.0358 (13)0.0250 (12)0.0067 (10)0.0014 (10)0.0001 (9)
N20.0350 (19)0.0269 (16)0.046 (2)0.0000.0059 (15)0.000
O10.0587 (19)0.0226 (13)0.0295 (14)0.0000.0085 (13)0.000
O20.0748 (17)0.0372 (12)0.0387 (12)0.0047 (10)0.0128 (11)0.0126 (9)
O30.0569 (15)0.0538 (13)0.0385 (12)0.0006 (11)0.0193 (10)0.0019 (9)
O40.096 (2)0.0300 (12)0.0629 (15)0.0117 (11)0.0140 (14)0.0089 (10)
O50.061 (2)0.0414 (17)0.0443 (18)0.0008 (15)0.0000.000
C10.0273 (19)0.0275 (18)0.0260 (18)0.0000.0050 (14)0.000
C20.0287 (14)0.0305 (14)0.0217 (13)0.0032 (10)0.0009 (10)0.0014 (9)
C30.0279 (14)0.0303 (14)0.0275 (13)0.0010 (11)0.0001 (11)0.0051 (10)
C40.0262 (19)0.0248 (17)0.0337 (19)0.0000.0041 (15)0.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—O21.220 (3)O5—H5B0.91 (2)
N1—O31.230 (3)C1—C21.447 (3)
N1—C21.463 (3)C1—C2i1.447 (3)
N2—O41.219 (3)C2—C31.378 (4)
N2—O4i1.219 (3)C3—C41.383 (3)
N2—C41.453 (5)C3—H30.9300
O1—C11.255 (4)C4—C3i1.383 (3)
O5—H5A0.92 (2)
O2—N1—O3122.8 (2)C3—C2—C1124.3 (2)
O2—N1—C2119.5 (2)C3—C2—N1115.7 (2)
O3—N1—C2117.7 (2)C1—C2—N1119.9 (2)
O4—N2—O4i123.3 (3)C2—C3—C4118.6 (2)
O4—N2—C4118.37 (17)C2—C3—H3120.7
O4i—N2—C4118.37 (17)C4—C3—H3120.7
H5A—O5—H5B111 (5)C3i—C4—C3122.1 (3)
O1—C1—C2123.92 (15)C3i—C4—N2118.97 (16)
O1—C1—C2i123.92 (15)C3—C4—N2118.97 (16)
C2—C1—C2i112.2 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C3179.13 (18)C1—C2—C3—C41.7 (3)
C2i—C1—C2—C30.87 (18)N1—C2—C3—C4178.59 (19)
O1—C1—C2—N12.4 (3)C2—C3—C4—C3i0.81 (17)
C2i—C1—C2—N1177.6 (3)C2—C3—C4—N2179.19 (17)
O2—N1—C2—C3155.8 (3)O4—N2—C4—C3i178.42 (19)
O3—N1—C2—C323.8 (3)O4i—N2—C4—C3i1.58 (19)
O2—N1—C2—C127.2 (3)O4—N2—C4—C31.58 (19)
O3—N1—C2—C1153.3 (2)O4i—N2—C4—C3178.42 (19)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O5—H5B···O2ii0.91 (2)2.17 (2)3.061 (3)166 (5)
O5—H5A···O10.92 (2)1.93 (2)2.848 (2)172 (5)
C3—H3···O3iii0.932.523.450 (2)175
Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x, y, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaH3O+·C6H2N3O7
Mr247.13
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Ibca
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)7.1510 (6), 19.80820 (18), 13.50610 (12)
V3)1913.12 (16)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.16
Crystal size (mm)0.45 × 0.34 × 0.31
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2002)
Tmin, Tmax0.936, 0.951
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3842, 848, 654
Rint0.044
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.044, 0.140, 1.12
No. of reflections848
No. of parameters89
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.21, 0.41

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2002), SAINT (Bruker, 2002), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O5—H5B···O2i0.91 (2)2.17 (2)3.061 (3)166 (5)
O5—H5A···O10.92 (2)1.93 (2)2.848 (2)172 (5)
C3—H3···O3ii0.932.523.450 (2)175
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y, z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Education Office Foundation of Zhejiang Province (project No. Y201017321) and from the Innovation Project of Zhejiang A & F University.

References

First citationBruker (2002). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationHarrison, W. T. A., Swamy, M. T., Nagaraja, P., Yathirajan, H. S. & Narayana, B. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o3892.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationJin, S. W., Zhang, W. B., Liu, L., Gao, H. F., Wang, D. Q., Chen, R. P. & Xu, X. L. (2010). J. Mol. Struct. 975, 128–136.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMuthamizhchelvan, C., Saminathan, K., Fraanje, J., Peschar, R. & Sivakamar, K. (2005). Anal. Sci. 21, x61–x62.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSmith, G., Wermuth, U. D. & Healy, P. C. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, o1800–o1803.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds