metal-organic compounds
The monoclinic polymorph of dimethylarsinic acid
aNelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Summerstrand Campus, Department of Chemistry, University Way, Summerstrand, PO Box 77000, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa
*Correspondence e-mail: richard.betz@webmail.co.za
The title compound, C2H7AsO2 or [As(CH3)2O(OH)], is an organic derivative of arsinic acid, and is also known by its cacodylic acid. In contrast to the first polymorph (triclinic, P, Z = 2), the current study revealed monoclinic symmetry (space group C2/c, Z = 8) for the second polymorph. The configuration of the tetrahedral molecule shows approximate Cs symmetry. Strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds connect the molecules to infinite zigzag chains along [010], which are further connected by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O contacts into a three-dimensional network.
Related literature
For the ). For graph-set analysis of hydrogen bonds, see: Etter et al. (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995).
of the triclinic polymorph of the title compound, see: Trotter & Zobel (1965Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2010); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536811025505/wm2504sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811025505/wm2504Isup2.cdx
Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811025505/wm2504Isup3.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811025505/wm2504Isup4.cml
The compound was obtained commercially (KEK). Crystals suitable for the X-ray diffraction study were taken directly from the provided product.
The H atoms of the methyl groups were allowed to rotate with a fixed angle around the C—As bonds to best fit the experimental electron density (HFIX 137 in the SHELX program suite (Sheldrick, 2008)), with U(H) set to 1.5Ueq(C). The H atom of the hydroxyl group was found from a difference Fourier map and allowed to rotate with a fixed angle around the O—As bond to best fit the experimental electron density (HFIX 147 in the SHELX program suite (Sheldrick, 2008)), its U(H) set to 1.5Ueq(O).
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2010); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2010); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).[As(CH3)2O(OH)] | F(000) = 544 |
Mr = 138.00 | Dx = 1.955 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Melting point = 468–469 K |
Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å |
a = 15.764 (9) Å | Cell parameters from 6920 reflections |
b = 6.494 (5) Å | θ = 2.2–28.4° |
c = 11.302 (4) Å | µ = 7.09 mm−1 |
β = 125.86 (3)° | T = 200 K |
V = 937.7 (10) Å3 | Block, colourless |
Z = 8 | 0.49 × 0.42 × 0.39 mm |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 1166 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1117 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.040 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 28.4°, θmin = 3.5° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008) | h = −20→20 |
Tmin = 0.608, Tmax = 1.000 | k = −8→7 |
7792 measured reflections | l = −15→15 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.020 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.055 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.20 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0242P)2 + 1.2973P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1166 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
49 parameters | Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.80 e Å−3 |
[As(CH3)2O(OH)] | V = 937.7 (10) Å3 |
Mr = 138.00 | Z = 8 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 15.764 (9) Å | µ = 7.09 mm−1 |
b = 6.494 (5) Å | T = 200 K |
c = 11.302 (4) Å | 0.49 × 0.42 × 0.39 mm |
β = 125.86 (3)° |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 1166 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008) | 1117 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.608, Tmax = 1.000 | Rint = 0.040 |
7792 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.020 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.055 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.20 | Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 |
1166 reflections | Δρmin = −0.80 e Å−3 |
49 parameters |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
As1 | 0.338221 (14) | 0.33757 (3) | 0.373791 (19) | 0.01723 (9) | |
O1 | 0.37470 (13) | 0.5820 (2) | 0.44526 (17) | 0.0268 (3) | |
H1 | 0.3510 | 0.6676 | 0.3770 | 0.040* | |
O2 | 0.20889 (12) | 0.3139 (2) | 0.27582 (18) | 0.0260 (3) | |
C1 | 0.4078 (2) | 0.1666 (3) | 0.5414 (3) | 0.0293 (5) | |
H1A | 0.3803 | 0.1934 | 0.5985 | 0.044* | |
H1B | 0.4830 | 0.1961 | 0.6013 | 0.044* | |
H1C | 0.3961 | 0.0218 | 0.5113 | 0.044* | |
C2 | 0.38735 (18) | 0.2918 (4) | 0.2580 (2) | 0.0270 (4) | |
H2A | 0.3738 | 0.1485 | 0.2243 | 0.041* | |
H2B | 0.4628 | 0.3188 | 0.3162 | 0.041* | |
H2C | 0.3509 | 0.3843 | 0.1734 | 0.041* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
As1 | 0.01664 (13) | 0.01855 (13) | 0.01733 (13) | 0.00089 (6) | 0.01041 (10) | −0.00034 (6) |
O1 | 0.0276 (8) | 0.0202 (7) | 0.0229 (7) | −0.0003 (6) | 0.0092 (6) | −0.0043 (6) |
O2 | 0.0164 (7) | 0.0298 (8) | 0.0314 (8) | −0.0006 (6) | 0.0137 (7) | −0.0059 (6) |
C1 | 0.0327 (12) | 0.0311 (12) | 0.0269 (11) | 0.0066 (9) | 0.0189 (10) | 0.0092 (8) |
C2 | 0.0269 (11) | 0.0353 (11) | 0.0279 (10) | −0.0045 (9) | 0.0211 (9) | −0.0053 (9) |
As1—O2 | 1.6617 (19) | C1—H1B | 0.9800 |
As1—O1 | 1.7201 (19) | C1—H1C | 0.9800 |
As1—C2 | 1.895 (2) | C2—H2A | 0.9800 |
As1—C1 | 1.895 (2) | C2—H2B | 0.9800 |
O1—H1 | 0.8400 | C2—H2C | 0.9800 |
C1—H1A | 0.9800 | ||
O2—As1—O1 | 109.90 (8) | As1—C1—H1C | 109.5 |
O2—As1—C2 | 111.32 (10) | H1A—C1—H1C | 109.5 |
O1—As1—C2 | 108.04 (9) | H1B—C1—H1C | 109.5 |
O2—As1—C1 | 112.19 (10) | As1—C2—H2A | 109.5 |
O1—As1—C1 | 103.46 (10) | As1—C2—H2B | 109.5 |
C2—As1—C1 | 111.56 (11) | H2A—C2—H2B | 109.5 |
As1—O1—H1 | 109.5 | As1—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
As1—C1—H1A | 109.5 | H2A—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
As1—C1—H1B | 109.5 | H2B—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
H1A—C1—H1B | 109.5 |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···O2i | 0.84 | 1.69 | 2.528 (2) | 172 |
C1—H1A···O2ii | 0.98 | 2.52 | 3.481 (3) | 167 |
C2—H2B···O1iii | 0.98 | 2.48 | 3.354 (3) | 148 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [As(CH3)2O(OH)] |
Mr | 138.00 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 200 |
a, b, c (Å) | 15.764 (9), 6.494 (5), 11.302 (4) |
β (°) | 125.86 (3) |
V (Å3) | 937.7 (10) |
Z | 8 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 7.09 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.49 × 0.42 × 0.39 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.608, 1.000 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 7792, 1166, 1117 |
Rint | 0.040 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.668 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.020, 0.055, 1.20 |
No. of reflections | 1166 |
No. of parameters | 49 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.31, −0.80 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010), SAINT (Bruker, 2010), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···O2i | 0.84 | 1.69 | 2.528 (2) | 172 |
C1—H1A···O2ii | 0.98 | 2.52 | 3.481 (3) | 167 |
C2—H2B···O1iii | 0.98 | 2.48 | 3.354 (3) | 148 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mr Eric Bashman for helpful discussions.
References
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bruker (2008). SADABS. Bruker Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bruker (2010). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Trotter, J. & Zobel, T. (1965). J. Chem. Soc. pp. 4466–4471. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The precipitation of amines from their respective organic synthesis mixtures as the ammonium salts of inorganic acids is a common practice for obtaining and purifying the desired products. However, for a couple of higher-alkylated amines, the viability of this class of compounds as phase-transfer catalysts becomes troublesome with respect to their persistent solubility which is detrimental for achieving quantitative yields following this simple synthetic protocol. Decreasing the solubility of a protonated amine can be done upon variation of the counterion which may allow for a better packing and more pronounced intermolecular interactions in the solid state. Since we intended to perform a comprehensive study involving a variety of higher-alkylated amines, we set out to optimize the yield of several established synthesis procedures by variation of the acid used for precipitation. To allow for a rationalization and tailoring of the counterions to be preferred, we determined the crystal structure of the title compound to enable comparative studies in isolated, crystalline precipitates. The crystal structure of the title compound has been determined previously (Trotter & Zobel (1965)). However, a different crystal system (triclinic, space group P1, Z = 2) was reported, suggesting that the title compound is polymorphic. Moreover, hydrogen atoms were not included in the previous refinement procedure.
The length of the As–O-bonds show a marked difference with the formal As–O-double bond being shorter by about 0.06 Å than the corresponding single bond. A projection of both methyl groups along the C—C-axis shows their hydrogen atoms to adopt an ecliptic conformation (Fig. 1).
In the crystal structure, O—H···O hydrogen bonds as well as intermolecular C—H···O contacts, whose range falls by about 0.2 Å below the sum of the van-der-Waals radii of the atoms participating, are present. The hydrogen bonds are formed between the H atom of the hydroxyl group as donor and the formally double-bonded oxygen atom and connect the molecules to zigzag chains along [010]. The C—H···O contacts are supported by one hydrogen atom per methyl group each as the donor atom. While for one methyl group the double bonded O atom acts as acceptor and gives rise to the formation of centrosymmetric cacodylic acid dimers, the oxygen atom of the hydroxyl group acts as acceptor for the other methyl group. In this case, too, the formation of centrosymmetric cacodylic acid dimers can be observed. In total, the molecules are connected to a three-dimensional network in the crystal structure. In terms of graph-set analysis (Etter et al. (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995)), the descriptor for the classical hydrogen bonds is C11(4) on the unitary level while both C—H···O contacts necessitate a R22(8) descriptor on the same level (Fig. 2).
The packing of the title compound in the crystal structure is shown in Figure 3.