inorganic compounds
Lithium cobalt(II) pyrophosphate, Li1.86CoP2O7, from synchrotron X-ray powder data
aChemistry and Materials, SUNY Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: stanwhit@gmail.com
Structure 1.865CoP2O7, which is also verified by the ICP measurement. Two Co sites exist in the structure: one is a CoO5 square pyramid and the other is a CoO6 octahedron. They share edges and are further interconnected through P2O7 groups, forming a three-dimensional framework, which exhibits different kinds of intersecting tunnels containing Li cations and could be of great interest in Li ion battery chemistry. The structure also exhibits cation disorder with 13.5% Co residing at the lithium (Li1) site. Co seems to have an average of 2.135, as obtained from the strutural stochiometry that closely supports the findings.
of high-resolution X-ray powder diffraction data of the title compound gave the composition LiRelated literature
For related structures, see: Adam et al. (2008); Nishimura et al. (2010); Zhou et al. (2011). For related materials with Na+ and K+ cations, see: Erragh et al. (1991); Sanz et al. (1999); Beaury et al. (2004); Gopalakrishna et al. (2005); Bih et al. (2006); Guesmi et al. (2007). For related structural frameworks, see: Beaury et al. (2004); Fagginani & Calvo (1976); Sandström et al. (2003); Etheredge & Hwu (1995); El Maadi et al. (1995); Huang & Hwa (1998); Sanz et al. (1999); Erragh et al. (1998). Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in Thompson et al. (1987) and Finger et al. (1994).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection: Advance Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory; cell GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000); data reduction: Powder4 (Dragoe, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: GSAS; program(s) used to refine structure: GSAS; molecular graphics: CrystalMaker (Palmer, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536811038451/br2175sup1.cif
contains datablock I. DOI:Rietveld powder data: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536811038451/br2175Isup2.rtv
The powder sample was synthesized through a "wet" method based on mixing stoichiometric aqueous solutions of the precursors followed by thermal treatments. The general procedure involves the mixing of soluble precursors in distilled water followed by a slow evaporation through continuous stirring to dryness before annealing the resultant solids. The precursors for the synthesis were Li(CH3COO),Co(CH3COO)2. 4H2O,and NH4H2PO4, which were dissolved in 100 ml distilled water in a molar ratio of 2:1:2 (1.32 g, 2.49 g and 2.3 g respectively) to give a 0.02 molar lithium solution. The self-adjusted pH of all the solutions were found to be around 4.5. The solution was stirred and evaporated on a hot-plate in the hood followed by vacuum oven drying overnight at 363 K. The resulting solid was preheated in a H2/He (8.5°/91.5° by volume) atmosphere at 673 K for 4h to decompose the precursors followed by reheating under the same atmosphere up to 873 K for 16h with intermittent grinding to obtain the pink colored powder as final product. The sample was also analyzed with a Perkin-Elmer ICP-OES Optima 7000 DV for the elemental content. The average result of 3 analyses showed that the ratio of Li: Co: P is 1.85: 0.996:2. In addition, the SQUID magnetic study on the sample using a Quantum Design MPMS XL SQUID magnetometer showed that the effective
of it is 5.23mBwhich is typical divalent Co.During structural
occupancy factor for Li1 and Co3 were refined using constrains for atomic coordinate, atomic displacement parameter, and keeping the sum of occupancy facter equals to unity, which later were fixed to their close refined values as 0.73 and 0.27 respectively. Occupancy for Co1 was also observed to be deficient and fixed to it's closely refined value of 0.739 to 0.73, in final cycles.A2MP2O7 is a large family, in which various frameworks are encountered consisting of MO6 octahedra (Fagginani et al., 1976; Sandström et.al., 2003) and MO4 polyhedra (Etheredge et al., 1995; Erragh et al., 1998; Sanz et al., 1999) interconnected through P2O7 groups (Fig. 1). Dimeric M2O10 units, built up of two edge-sharing MO6 octahedra, are only observed for some A2MP2O7 pyrophosphates (El Maadi et al. 1995; Huang et al. 1998) and dimeric M2O11 units(corner-shared MO6) seem to be much more rare, just observed for Na2CoP2O7 (Erragh et al. 1991). Two forms of structures were found for Na2CoP2O7 by Erragh et al. 1991: one is triclinic and another one is orthorhombic. The tetragonal structure of Na2CoP2O7 was reported by Sanz et al. 1999 and they found that the tetragonal form could be a derivative of the orthorhombic form, with a higher
for the former. In addition, the tetragonal structured Na2CoP2O7 was described by Guesmi et al. 2007. To our knowledge, the A2CoP2O7 with Li as cation has never been reported.Here, we report a new Li containing solid with a three-dimensional framework (Fig. 2) crystallizing in the monoclinic ∞ layers. A 3-D framework results from the interconnection between metal oxide and pyrophosphate groups, and the lithium cations are located in the tunnels thus formed (Fig 2). The structure of the related Fe-compound has been studied by us (Zhou et al. 2011) and Nishimura et al. (2010), as well as the electrochemical properties, which showed that it is a good candidate for the cathode material of lithium-ion batteries. The title compound also has the potential to work as the cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. We present here its as determined and refined from synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction data (Fig. 3).
P21/a. Its structure is similar to the recently reported Li2MnP2O7 (Adam et al. 2008), a new member of the A2MP2O7 family: original M2O9 units, built up of one MO5 trigonal bipyramid sharing one edge with one MO6 octahedron, sharing corners with P2O7 pyrophosphate groups to form undulating (M4P8O32)For related structures, see: Adam et al. (2008); Nishimura et al. (2010); Zhou et al. (2011). For related materials with Na and K cations, see: Erragh et al. (1991); Sanz et al. (1999); Beaury et al. (2004); Gopalakrishna et al. (2005); Bih et al. (2006); Guesmi et al. (2007). For related structural frameworks, see: Beaury et al. (2004); Fagginani & Calvo (1976); Sandström et al. (2003); Etheredge & Hwu (1995); El Maadi et al. (1995); Huang et al. (1998); Sanz et al. (1999); Erragh et al. (1998);
Data collection: Advance Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory; cell
GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000); data reduction: Powder4 (Dragoe, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000); program(s) used to refine structure: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000); molecular graphics: publCIF (Westrip, 2010); software used to prepare material for publication: CrystalMaker (Palmer, 2005).CoLi1.865O7P2 | F(000) = 948.7 |
Mr = 245.82 | Dx = 3.214 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/a | Melting point: 1023 K |
Hall symbol: -P 2yab | Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.413988 Å |
a = 9.76453 (4) Å | µ = 0.89 mm−1 |
b = 9.69622 (4) Å | T = 297 K |
c = 10.95952 (4) Å | Particle morphology: block |
β = 101.7664 (2)° | pink |
V = 1015.83 (1) Å3 | irregular, 15 × 13 mm |
Z = 8 | Specimen preparation: Prepared at 873 K and 101.325 kPa |
Advanced Photon Source diffractometer | Specimen mounting: kapton capillary |
Radiation source: Synchrotron | Data collection mode: transmission |
Si monochromator | Scan method: continuous |
Least-squares matrix: full | Excluded region(s): Reflections exceeding 2-theta 30 were omitted for the ease of refinement. |
Rp = 0.057 | Profile function: CW Profile function number 3 with 19 terms Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in Thompson et al., (1987) and Finger et al. (1994). #1(GU) = 6.454 #2(GV) = -0.998 #3(GW) = 0.075 #4(GP) = 0.000 #5(LX) = 0.327 #6(LY) = 0.000 #7(S/L) = 0.0011 #8(H/L) = 0.0014 #9(trns) = 0.00 #10(shft)= 0.0000 #11(stec)= 0.00 #12(ptec)= 0.00 #13(sfec)= 0.00 #14(L11) = 0.067 #15(L22) = 0.070 #16(L33) = 0.058 #17(L12) = 0.010 #18(L13) = 0.010 #19(L23) = -0.004 Peak tails are ignored where the intensity is below 0.0010 times the peak Aniso. broadening axis 0.0 0.0 1.0 |
Rwp = 0.080 | 269 parameters |
Rexp = 0.049 | 0 restraints |
R(F2) = 0.04534 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.03 |
24500 data points | Background function: GSAS Background function number 1 with 36 terms. Shifted Chebyshev function of 1st kind 1: 165.338 2: -31.4210 3: -8.19118 4: 6.28432 5: -10.8524 6: 14.3842 7: -8.22810 8: -0.949190 9: 13.3092 10: -14.8044 11: 4.75285 12: -1.09442 13: -0.739293 14: 5.47743 15: -2.87265 16: 1.05489 17: -3.22764 18: 1.21714 19: 0.537209 20: -3.25962 21: 2.18736 22: -1.12437 23: -2.15219 24: 3.41374 25: -3.88852 26: 1.14500 27: 3.06741 28: -3.05038 29: 0.529274 30: 0.298855 31: -4.06399 32: 1.50867 33: 1.15056 34: -2.20673 35: 0.550944 36: 5.540140E-02 |
CoLi1.865O7P2 | V = 1015.83 (1) Å3 |
Mr = 245.82 | Z = 8 |
Monoclinic, P21/a | Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.413988 Å |
a = 9.76453 (4) Å | µ = 0.89 mm−1 |
b = 9.69622 (4) Å | T = 297 K |
c = 10.95952 (4) Å | irregular, 15 × 13 mm |
β = 101.7664 (2)° |
Advanced Photon Source diffractometer | Data collection mode: transmission |
Specimen mounting: kapton capillary | Scan method: continuous |
Rp = 0.057 | 24500 data points |
Rwp = 0.080 | 269 parameters |
Rexp = 0.049 | 0 restraints |
R(F2) = 0.04534 |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Co1 | 0.25281 (15) | 0.71550 (15) | 0.18010 (14) | 0.0137 (4)* | 0.73 |
Co2 | 0.30165 (11) | 0.43043 (11) | 0.32719 (10) | 0.0095 (3)* | |
P1 | 0.3790 (2) | 0.6536 (2) | 0.5771 (2) | 0.0078 (5)* | |
P2 | 0.0613 (2) | 0.9265 (2) | 0.24116 (18) | 0.0089 (5)* | |
P3 | 0.0210 (2) | 0.4551 (2) | 0.75861 (19) | 0.0103 (5)* | |
P4 | 0.6144 (2) | 0.7956 (2) | −0.1113 (2) | 0.0117 (6)* | |
O1 | 0.1615 (5) | 0.8210 (5) | 0.3113 (5) | 0.0130 (14)* | |
O2 | 0.4709 (5) | 0.7806 (5) | −0.0792 (4) | 0.0106 (12)* | |
O3 | 0.3911 (5) | 0.8599 (4) | 0.1472 (5) | 0.0107 (13)* | |
O4 | 0.0302 (5) | 0.8437 (5) | 0.5592 (4) | 0.0116 (14)* | |
O5 | 0.4330 (5) | 0.4292 (5) | −0.1033 (4) | 0.0168 (13)* | |
O6 | 0.1790 (5) | 0.8356 (5) | −0.1511 (4) | 0.0115 (13)* | |
O7 | 0.0189 (5) | 0.4120 (4) | 0.6224 (4) | 0.0087 (13)* | |
O8 | 0.1866 (5) | 0.2976 (4) | 0.4146 (4) | 0.0047 (12)* | |
O9 | 0.1013 (5) | 0.6017 (4) | 0.7747 (4) | 0.0116 (13)* | |
O10 | 0.3827 (5) | 0.5734 (5) | 0.7087 (4) | 0.0061 (12)* | |
O11 | 0.4152 (5) | 0.5900 (4) | 0.2661 (4) | 0.0085 (13)* | |
O12 | 0.2775 (5) | 0.5646 (5) | 0.4803 (4) | 0.0134 (13)* | |
O13 | 0.3713 (5) | 1.0314 (5) | −0.2124 (5) | 0.0205 (15)* | |
O14 | 0.2204 (5) | 0.6299 (5) | −0.0018 (4) | 0.0094 (13)* | |
Li1 | 1.3433 (3) | 0.9255 (3) | −0.0397 (3) | 0.0087 (7)* | 0.73 |
Li2 | 0.0807 (17) | 0.1083 (15) | 0.0261 (15) | 0.009 (4)* | |
Li3 | 0.6728 (15) | 0.0711 (14) | 0.5465 (14) | 0.029 (4)* | |
Li4 | 0.400 (2) | 0.246 (2) | 0.5725 (17) | 0.065 (7)* | |
Co3 | 1.3433 (3) | 0.9255 (3) | −0.0397 (3) | 0.0087 (7)* | 0.27 |
Co1—O1 | 2.105 (5) | P2—O5v | 1.524 (4) |
Co1—O3 | 2.028 (4) | P2—O10iv | 1.584 (5) |
Co1—O11 | 2.067 (4) | P2—O11vi | 1.516 (5) |
Co1—O13i | 2.226 (5) | P3—O3ii | 1.514 (5) |
Co1—O14 | 2.123 (5) | P3—O7 | 1.546 (5) |
Co2—O4ii | 2.030 (5) | P3—O9 | 1.616 (4) |
Co2—O6i | 2.180 (5) | P3—O13vii | 1.563 (5) |
Co2—O8 | 2.068 (4) | P4—O2 | 1.519 (5) |
Co2—O11 | 2.091 (4) | P4—O6iii | 1.524 (4) |
Co2—O12 | 2.173 (4) | P4—O9viii | 1.582 (5) |
Co2—O13i | 2.128 (5) | P4—O14iii | 1.589 (5) |
P1—O4iii | 1.529 (5) | Co3—O2ix | 1.983 (5) |
P1—O8iv | 1.547 (4) | Co3—O3ix | 2.104 (6) |
P1—O10 | 1.633 (5) | Co3—O6ix | 2.006 (6) |
P1—O12 | 1.556 (4) | Co3—O13ix | 2.220 (5) |
P2—O1 | 1.512 (5) | Co3—O14x | 2.154 (5) |
O1—Co1—O3 | 100.14 (19) | O8—Co2—O11 | 169.24 (17) |
O1—Co1—O11 | 111.53 (19) | O8—Co2—O13i | 96.85 (19) |
O1—Co1—O14 | 145.9 (2) | O11—Co2—O13i | 83.05 (18) |
O3—Co1—O11 | 90.63 (18) | O8iv—P1—O10 | 108.2 (3) |
O3—Co1—O14 | 94.6 (2) | O8iv—P1—O12 | 109.1 (3) |
O11—Co1—O14 | 98.73 (18) | O10—P1—O12 | 103.6 (3) |
O4ii—Co2—O8 | 84.60 (18) | O1—P2—O5v | 111.4 (3) |
O4ii—Co2—O11 | 95.03 (18) | O1—P2—O10iv | 106.9 (3) |
O4ii—Co2—O13i | 177.0 (2) | O5v—P2—O10iv | 104.4 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z; (ii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1; (iii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z; (iv) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1; (v) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z; (vi) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z; (vii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z+1; (viii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z−1; (ix) x+1, y, z; (x) −x+3/2, y+1/2, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | CoLi1.865O7P2 |
Mr | 245.82 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/a |
Temperature (K) | 297 |
a, b, c (Å) | 9.76453 (4), 9.69622 (4), 10.95952 (4) |
β (°) | 101.7664 (2) |
V (Å3) | 1015.83 (1) |
Z | 8 |
Radiation type | Synchrotron, λ = 0.413988 Å |
µ (mm−1) | 0.89 |
Specimen shape, size (mm) | Irregular, 15 × 13 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Advanced Photon Source |
Specimen mounting | Kapton capillary |
Data collection mode | Transmission |
Scan method | Continuous |
2θ values (°) | 2θmin = ? 2θmax = ? 2θstep = ? |
Refinement | |
R factors and goodness of fit | Rp = 0.057, Rwp = 0.080, Rexp = 0.049, R(F2) = 0.04534, χ2 = 2.624 |
No. of parameters | 269 |
Computer programs: Advance Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory, GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000), Powder4 (Dragoe, 2001), publCIF (Westrip, 2010), CrystalMaker (Palmer, 2005).
Acknowledgements
Use of the Advanced Photon Source at the Argonne National Laboratory was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE–AC02-06CH11357. The research at Binghamton was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE–AC02-05CH11231, under the Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Program subcontract
6807148.References
Adam, L., Guesdon, A. & Raveau, B. (2008). J. Solid State Chem. 181, 3110–3115. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Beaury, L., Derouet, J., Binet, J., Sanz, F. & Ruiz-Valero, C. (2004). J. Solid State Chem. 177, 1437–1443. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bih, H., Saadoune, I. & Mansori, M. (2006). Moroc. J. Condens. Matter, 7, 74–76. Google Scholar
Dragoe, N. (2001). J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 535. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
El Maadi, A., Boukhari, A. & Holt, E. M. (1995). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 25, 531–536. CAS Google Scholar
Erragh, F., Boukhari, A., Elouadi, B. & Holt, E. M. (1991). J. Cryst. Spect. Res. 21, 321–326. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Erragh, F., Boukhari, A., Sadel, A. & Holt, E. M. (1998). Acta Cryst. C54, 1373–1376. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Etheredge, K. M. S. & Hwu, S. J. (1995). Inorg. Chem. 34, 1495–1499. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Fagginani, R. & Calvo, C. (1976). Can. J. Chem., 54, 3319–3324. Google Scholar
Finger, L. W., Cox, D. E. & Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 892–900. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gopalakrishna, G. S., Mahesh, M. J., Ashamanjari, K. G. & Shashidharaprasad, J. (2005). J. Cryst. Growth, 281, 604–610. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Guesmi, A., Ouerfelli, N., Mazza, D. & Driss, A. (2007). Acta Cryst. A63, s277–s278. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Huang, Q. & Hwu, S. J. (1998). Inorg. Chem. 37, 5869–5874. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2000). GSAS. Report LAUR 86-748. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA. Google Scholar
Nishimura, S., Nakamura, M., Natsui, R. & Yamada, A. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 13596–13597. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Palmer, D. (2005). CrystalMaker. CrystalMaker Software Ltd, Yarnton, England. Google Scholar
Sandström, M., Fischer, A. & Boström, D. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, i139–i141. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sanz, F., Parada, C., Rojo, J. M., Reuiz-Valero, C. & Saez-Puche, R. (1999). J. Solid State Chem. 145, 604–611. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Thompson, P., Cox, D. E. & Hastings, J. B. (1987). J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 79–83. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zhou, H., Upreti, S., Chernova, N., Hautier, G., Ceder, G. & Whittingham, M. S. (2011). Chem. Mater. 23,293–300. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
A2MP2O7 is a large family, in which various frameworks are encountered consisting of MO6 octahedra (Fagginani et al., 1976; Sandström et.al., 2003) and MO4 polyhedra (Etheredge et al., 1995; Erragh et al., 1998; Sanz et al., 1999) interconnected through P2O7 groups (Fig. 1). Dimeric M2O10 units, built up of two edge-sharing MO6 octahedra, are only observed for some A2MP2O7 pyrophosphates (El Maadi et al. 1995; Huang et al. 1998) and dimeric M2O11 units(corner-shared MO6) seem to be much more rare, just observed for Na2CoP2O7 (Erragh et al. 1991). Two forms of structures were found for Na2CoP2O7 by Erragh et al. 1991: one is triclinic and another one is orthorhombic. The tetragonal structure of Na2CoP2O7 was reported by Sanz et al. 1999 and they found that the tetragonal form could be a derivative of the orthorhombic form, with a higher point symmetry for the former. In addition, the tetragonal structured Na2CoP2O7 was described by Guesmi et al. 2007. To our knowledge, the A2CoP2O7 with Li as cation has never been reported.
Here, we report a new Li containing solid with a three-dimensional framework (Fig. 2) crystallizing in the monoclinic space group P21/a. Its structure is similar to the recently reported Li2MnP2O7 (Adam et al. 2008), a new member of the A2MP2O7 family: original M2O9 units, built up of one MO5 trigonal bipyramid sharing one edge with one MO6 octahedron, sharing corners with P2O7 pyrophosphate groups to form undulating (M4P8O32)∞ layers. A 3-D framework results from the interconnection between metal oxide and pyrophosphate groups, and the lithium cations are located in the tunnels thus formed (Fig 2). The structure of the related Fe-compound has been studied by us (Zhou et al. 2011) and Nishimura et al. (2010), as well as the electrochemical properties, which showed that it is a good candidate for the cathode material of lithium-ion batteries. The title compound also has the potential to work as the cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. We present here its crystal structure, as determined and refined from synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction data (Fig. 3).