organic compounds
1,4-Bis(1,1-dimethylpropyl)-2,5-dimethoxybenzene
aDepartment of Science Education, Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University, 1-1-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi–Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: kamimo@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
The title compound, C18H30O2, was prepared by Friedel–Crafts alkylation of 1,4-dimethoxybenzene with 2-methyl-2-butanol. The complete molecule is generated by the application of a crystallographic centre of inversion. The two methoxy groups are oriented in the same plane of the aromatic ring [C—C—O—C torsion angle = 9.14 (16)°]. While one methyl group of the tert-pentyl substituent is coplanar with the benzene ring [C—C—C—C = 0.45 (15)°] and lies towards the less-hindered H atom, the other methyl and ethyl groups are directed to either side of the benzene ring [C—C—C—C torsion angles = 118.78 (12) and 59.11 (14)°, respectively]. In the crystal, the hydrophobic molecules pack to form a brick-wall-like architecture.
Related literature
For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Polito et al. (2010) and for the synthesis of the analogous compound, 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene, see: Williamson et al. (2006). For the unique crystal growth of 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene, see: Blatchly & Hartshorne (1966). For the of 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene, see: Rosokha & Kochi (2007).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053681103772X/tk2787sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053681103772X/tk2787Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053681103772X/tk2787Isup3.cml
In a 50-ml Erlenmeyer flask were placed 690 mg (5 mmol) of 1,4-dimethoxybenzene, 1.3 g (1.5 mmol) of 2-methyl-2-butanol, and 1.5 ml of glacial acetic acid. The Erlenmeyer flask was immersed in an ice-water bath to cool the solution below 278 K. Concentrated sulfuric acid (5 ml) was added dropwise into the vigorously stirred reaction mixture so as not to exceed the temperature of 283 K. When all the sulfuric acid was added, the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 minutes. The Erlenmeyer flask was immersed again in an ice-water bath, and then a sufficient amount of ice-cold water was added into the reaction mixture to quench the reaction and isolate the product. The white solid was filtered off on a small Büchner funnel and washed with a small amount of ice-cold ethanol. Single crystals were obtained by recrystallization from its ethanol solution; M.pt. 382–383 K. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):δ 6.72 (s, 2 H), 3.76 (s, 6 H), 1.77 (q, 4 H), 1.29 (s, 12 H), 0.62 (q, 6 H) p.p.m. IR (KBr): 2962, 2933, 2868, 1506, 1481, 1392, 1369, 1209, 1128, 1041, 865 cm-1. APCI-MS: m/z [M—H]+ = 277.21621.
Electrophilic aromatic substitution is one of the key reactions in organic chemistry. The Friedel-Crafts alkylation of 1,4-dimethoxybenzene with tert-butyl alcohol is a popular introductory organic laboratory experiment to illustrate the features of electrophilic aromatic substitution (Williamson et al., 2006). The product, 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene, (I), has also been reported to exhibit a dramatic change of shape during crystal growth (Blatchly and Hartshorne, 1966). Recently, a synthesis involving electrophilic aromatic substitution coupled with a Wagner-Meerwein rearrangement using 1,4-dimethoxybenzene with 2-methyl-2-butanol was reported (Polito et al., 2010). However, the product, 1,4-bis(1,1-dimethylpropyl)-2,5-dimethoxybenzene (II), has no dramatic crystal growth behaviour. To obtain the perspectives on both development of sophisticated laboratory activity in organic chemistry and the relationship between crystal growth and molecular structure, the X-ray
of the title compound (II) was performed, and the structural features of (I) and (II) discussed in this article. The of (I) has already been reported (Rosokha and Kochi, 2007).Compound (I) crystallizes in the monoclinic π-plane is 3.47 (1) Å. The crystal packing exhibits a herringbone structure. Compound (II) crystallizes in the triclinic P1 (Fig. 1). The of (II) contains half a molecule with the complete molecule being generated by a centre of inversion located in the benzene ring. In contrast to (I), the methoxy groups lie on almost the same plane as the benzene ring, where the dihedral angle is 4.9 (1) °. The ethyl chains of two tert-pentyl groups stand to one side of the benzene plane in an anti-orientation, where the dihedral angle is 83.8 (2) °. Since the ethyl chain and methyl group of tert-pentyl group and methoxy group are aggregated by hydrophobic interactions, each molecule is closely arranged in the brick-wall fashion (Fig. 2). Compared to (II) the packing mode of (I) seems to be relatively loose, resulting the expression of dynamic crystal growth of (I).
P21/c. The methoxy groups are inclined at 33.9 (1) ° to the benzene plane. The methyl C—H of the methoxy group points to the adjacent benzene ring in a face-on-edge manner, in which the distance between the methyl carbon and theFor the synthesis and an educational use of the title compound, see: Polito et al. (2010). For the synthesis and an educational use of the analogous compound, 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene, see: Williamson et al. (2006). For the unique crystal growth of 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene, see: Blatchly & Hartshorne (1966). For the
of 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene, see: Rosokha & Kochi (2007).Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).C18H30O2 | Z = 1 |
Mr = 278.42 | F(000) = 154 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.123 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -P 1 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å |
a = 6.456 (5) Å | Cell parameters from 1654 reflections |
b = 6.551 (5) Å | θ = 3.3–28.8° |
c = 10.800 (5) Å | µ = 0.07 mm−1 |
α = 93.120 (5)° | T = 90 K |
β = 105.950 (5)° | Plate, colourless |
γ = 108.460 (5)° | 0.4 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm |
V = 411.5 (5) Å3 |
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1888 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1698 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.013 |
Detector resolution: 8.333 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 29.0°, θmin = 2.0° |
φ and ω scan | h = −8→5 |
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements) (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)' | k = −8→8 |
Tmin = 0.972, Tmax = 0.993 | l = −12→14 |
2473 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.114 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.10 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0566P)2 + 0.1363P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1888 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
151 parameters | Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3 |
C18H30O2 | γ = 108.460 (5)° |
Mr = 278.42 | V = 411.5 (5) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 1 |
a = 6.456 (5) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 6.551 (5) Å | µ = 0.07 mm−1 |
c = 10.800 (5) Å | T = 90 K |
α = 93.120 (5)° | 0.4 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm |
β = 105.950 (5)° |
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1888 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements) (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)' | 1698 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.972, Tmax = 0.993 | Rint = 0.013 |
2473 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.114 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.10 | Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3 |
1888 reflections | Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3 |
151 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.66045 (17) | 0.40800 (16) | 0.56010 (10) | 0.0142 (2) | |
C2 | 0.54020 (18) | 0.34722 (16) | 0.42749 (10) | 0.0146 (2) | |
C3 | 0.37620 (17) | 0.43475 (16) | 0.36311 (10) | 0.0134 (2) | |
C4 | 0.24450 (18) | 0.36052 (16) | 0.21713 (10) | 0.0149 (2) | |
C5 | 0.28316 (19) | 0.55446 (18) | 0.13993 (10) | 0.0186 (2) | |
C6 | 0.5309 (2) | 0.7013 (2) | 0.16805 (13) | 0.0273 (3) | |
C7 | 0.3162 (2) | 0.18507 (18) | 0.15790 (11) | 0.0199 (3) | |
C8 | −0.01503 (19) | 0.25829 (19) | 0.19763 (11) | 0.0203 (3) | |
C9 | 0.8811 (2) | 0.17879 (18) | 0.54390 (11) | 0.0191 (2) | |
O1 | 0.81796 (14) | 0.31572 (13) | 0.62220 (7) | 0.0203 (2) | |
H2 | 0.574 (3) | 0.240 (2) | 0.3790 (14) | 0.025 (4)* | |
H5A | 0.215 (3) | 0.492 (2) | 0.0462 (15) | 0.023 (4)* | |
H5B | 0.196 (2) | 0.646 (2) | 0.1572 (14) | 0.021 (3)* | |
H6A | 0.599 (3) | 0.782 (3) | 0.2639 (17) | 0.036 (4)* | |
H6B | 0.635 (3) | 0.615 (3) | 0.1542 (17) | 0.037 (4)* | |
H6C | 0.544 (3) | 0.819 (3) | 0.1069 (16) | 0.034 (4)* | |
H7A | 0.226 (3) | 0.138 (2) | 0.0662 (15) | 0.025 (4)* | |
H7B | 0.479 (3) | 0.238 (3) | 0.1626 (16) | 0.030 (4)* | |
H7C | 0.286 (2) | 0.050 (2) | 0.2014 (14) | 0.023 (3)* | |
H8A | −0.073 (3) | 0.360 (2) | 0.2338 (14) | 0.021 (3)* | |
H8B | −0.046 (3) | 0.123 (3) | 0.2390 (15) | 0.028 (4)* | |
H8C | −0.097 (3) | 0.216 (2) | 0.1031 (15) | 0.024 (4)* | |
H9A | 0.744 (3) | 0.043 (2) | 0.5000 (14) | 0.024 (4)* | |
H9B | 1.000 (3) | 0.144 (2) | 0.6036 (15) | 0.027 (4)* | |
H9C | 0.940 (2) | 0.256 (2) | 0.4774 (14) | 0.021 (3)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0147 (5) | 0.0146 (5) | 0.0137 (5) | 0.0060 (4) | 0.0038 (4) | 0.0032 (4) |
C2 | 0.0169 (5) | 0.0136 (5) | 0.0134 (5) | 0.0052 (4) | 0.0052 (4) | 0.0005 (4) |
C3 | 0.0140 (5) | 0.0128 (5) | 0.0117 (5) | 0.0025 (4) | 0.0039 (4) | 0.0012 (3) |
C4 | 0.0161 (5) | 0.0155 (5) | 0.0113 (5) | 0.0049 (4) | 0.0027 (4) | 0.0001 (4) |
C5 | 0.0227 (6) | 0.0191 (5) | 0.0127 (5) | 0.0061 (4) | 0.0046 (4) | 0.0025 (4) |
C6 | 0.0246 (6) | 0.0294 (6) | 0.0248 (6) | 0.0034 (5) | 0.0089 (5) | 0.0072 (5) |
C7 | 0.0241 (6) | 0.0199 (5) | 0.0138 (5) | 0.0087 (4) | 0.0024 (4) | −0.0029 (4) |
C8 | 0.0168 (5) | 0.0222 (6) | 0.0166 (5) | 0.0028 (4) | 0.0020 (4) | 0.0005 (4) |
C9 | 0.0215 (5) | 0.0214 (5) | 0.0179 (5) | 0.0129 (4) | 0.0056 (4) | 0.0021 (4) |
O1 | 0.0255 (4) | 0.0258 (4) | 0.0137 (4) | 0.0173 (3) | 0.0028 (3) | 0.0007 (3) |
C1—O1 | 1.3812 (14) | C6—H6A | 1.043 (17) |
C1—C2 | 1.3941 (15) | C6—H6B | 1.037 (17) |
C1—C3i | 1.4051 (15) | C6—H6C | 1.038 (18) |
C2—C3 | 1.3988 (16) | C7—H7A | 0.976 (15) |
C2—H2 | 0.963 (15) | C7—H7B | 0.984 (17) |
C3—C1i | 1.4051 (15) | C7—H7C | 1.012 (16) |
C3—C4 | 1.5371 (15) | C8—H8A | 0.973 (15) |
C4—C7 | 1.5376 (16) | C8—H8B | 1.003 (17) |
C4—C8 | 1.5428 (19) | C8—H8C | 0.990 (15) |
C4—C5 | 1.5494 (17) | C9—O1 | 1.4229 (14) |
C5—C6 | 1.5172 (19) | C9—H9A | 1.014 (16) |
C5—H5A | 0.991 (15) | C9—H9B | 0.955 (16) |
C5—H5B | 0.985 (15) | C9—H9C | 0.992 (15) |
O1—C1—C2 | 121.95 (10) | H6A—C6—H6B | 107.7 (13) |
O1—C1—C3i | 117.05 (9) | C5—C6—H6C | 110.9 (9) |
C2—C1—C3i | 121.00 (10) | H6A—C6—H6C | 107.8 (13) |
C1—C2—C3 | 122.99 (10) | H6B—C6—H6C | 107.0 (13) |
C1—C2—H2 | 117.7 (9) | C4—C7—H7A | 109.6 (9) |
C3—C2—H2 | 119.3 (9) | C4—C7—H7B | 112.6 (9) |
C2—C3—C1i | 116.02 (10) | H7A—C7—H7B | 107.7 (13) |
C2—C3—C4 | 121.35 (9) | C4—C7—H7C | 112.1 (8) |
C1i—C3—C4 | 122.63 (9) | H7A—C7—H7C | 106.2 (12) |
C3—C4—C7 | 111.63 (9) | H7B—C7—H7C | 108.4 (12) |
C3—C4—C8 | 109.87 (9) | C4—C8—H8A | 111.4 (9) |
C7—C4—C8 | 106.83 (9) | C4—C8—H8B | 109.7 (9) |
C3—C4—C5 | 111.30 (9) | H8A—C8—H8B | 110.2 (13) |
C7—C4—C5 | 108.72 (10) | C4—C8—H8C | 108.6 (9) |
C8—C4—C5 | 108.33 (9) | H8A—C8—H8C | 108.9 (12) |
C6—C5—C4 | 115.63 (10) | H8B—C8—H8C | 107.9 (13) |
C6—C5—H5A | 110.5 (9) | O1—C9—H9A | 109.7 (9) |
C4—C5—H5A | 106.6 (9) | O1—C9—H9B | 104.8 (9) |
C6—C5—H5B | 107.9 (9) | H9A—C9—H9B | 111.0 (12) |
C4—C5—H5B | 109.7 (9) | O1—C9—H9C | 111.1 (8) |
H5A—C5—H5B | 106.2 (12) | H9A—C9—H9C | 110.1 (12) |
C5—C6—H6A | 111.1 (10) | H9B—C9—H9C | 110.1 (13) |
C5—C6—H6B | 112.1 (10) | C1—O1—C9 | 118.00 (9) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C18H30O2 |
Mr | 278.42 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 90 |
a, b, c (Å) | 6.456 (5), 6.551 (5), 10.800 (5) |
α, β, γ (°) | 93.120 (5), 105.950 (5), 108.460 (5) |
V (Å3) | 411.5 (5) |
Z | 1 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.07 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.4 × 0.2 × 0.1 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector |
Absorption correction | Empirical (using intensity measurements) (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)' |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.972, 0.993 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2473, 1888, 1698 |
Rint | 0.013 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.682 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.042, 0.114, 1.10 |
No. of reflections | 1888 |
No. of parameters | 151 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.40, −0.22 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009), SAINT (Bruker, 2009), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (grant No. 23700956) and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (grant No. 22300272) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). The measurements of X-ray crystallographic, 1H NMR and APCI-MS data were performed at the Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development (N-BARD), Hiroshima University.
References
Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Blatchly, J. M. & Hartshorne, N. H. (1966). Trans. Faraday Soc. 62, 512–518. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bruker (2009). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Polito, V., Hamann, C. S. & Rhile, I. J. (2010). J. Chem. Educ. 87, 969–967. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rosokha, S. V. & Kochi, J. K. (2007). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 3683–3697. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Williamson, K. L., Minard, R. & Masters, K. M. (2006). Macroscale and Microscale Organic Experiments, 5th ed., ch. 29, pp. 436–450. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Electrophilic aromatic substitution is one of the key reactions in organic chemistry. The Friedel-Crafts alkylation of 1,4-dimethoxybenzene with tert-butyl alcohol is a popular introductory organic laboratory experiment to illustrate the features of electrophilic aromatic substitution (Williamson et al., 2006). The product, 1,4-di-tert-butyl-2,5-dimethoxybenzene, (I), has also been reported to exhibit a dramatic change of shape during crystal growth (Blatchly and Hartshorne, 1966). Recently, a synthesis involving electrophilic aromatic substitution coupled with a Wagner-Meerwein rearrangement using 1,4-dimethoxybenzene with 2-methyl-2-butanol was reported (Polito et al., 2010). However, the product, 1,4-bis(1,1-dimethylpropyl)-2,5-dimethoxybenzene (II), has no dramatic crystal growth behaviour. To obtain the perspectives on both development of sophisticated laboratory activity in organic chemistry and the relationship between crystal growth and molecular structure, the X-ray diffraction analysis of the title compound (II) was performed, and the structural features of (I) and (II) discussed in this article. The crystal structure of (I) has already been reported (Rosokha and Kochi, 2007).
Compound (I) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c. The methoxy groups are inclined at 33.9 (1) ° to the benzene plane. The methyl C—H of the methoxy group points to the adjacent benzene ring in a face-on-edge manner, in which the distance between the methyl carbon and the π-plane is 3.47 (1) Å. The crystal packing exhibits a herringbone structure. Compound (II) crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (Fig. 1). The asymmetric unit of (II) contains half a molecule with the complete molecule being generated by a centre of inversion located in the benzene ring. In contrast to (I), the methoxy groups lie on almost the same plane as the benzene ring, where the dihedral angle is 4.9 (1) °. The ethyl chains of two tert-pentyl groups stand to one side of the benzene plane in an anti-orientation, where the dihedral angle is 83.8 (2) °. Since the ethyl chain and methyl group of tert-pentyl group and methoxy group are aggregated by hydrophobic interactions, each molecule is closely arranged in the brick-wall fashion (Fig. 2). Compared to (II) the packing mode of (I) seems to be relatively loose, resulting the expression of dynamic crystal growth of (I).