organic compounds
Piperazine-1,4-diium diacetate
aDepartment of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang 455000, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: ayithou@yahoo.com.cn
In the title salt, C4H12N22+·2C2H3O2−, the piperazine-1,4-diium cation has 2/m symmetry with the NH2 unit located on a mirror plane and the acetate anion has m symmetry with all non-H atoms and one H atom located on a mirror plane. The piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. In the crystal, the cations are linked with the anions via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding into chains parallel to the c axis.
Related literature
For the synthesis and properties of related compounds, see: Blagden et al. (2008); Vishweshwar et al. (2006); Fu et al. (2009).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536811047441/xu5380sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536811047441/xu5380Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536811047441/xu5380Isup3.cml
A mixture of piperazine (2.0 mmol) and acetic acid (2.0 mL) in 20 mL distilled water was refluxed for 5 h, then cooled and filtrated. The filtrate was evaporated slowly in the air. Colorless block crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained after one week.
All H atoms attached to C atoms were fixed geometrically and treated as riding with C—H = 0.97 Å (methylene) and C—H = 0.96 Å (methyl) with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(methylene) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(methyl). H atoms bonded to N atoms were located in difference Fourier map and restrained with the H—N1 = 0.90 (2)Å. In the last stage of
they were treated as riding on the N atom with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(N).The amino derivatives have found wide range of applications in material science, such as solid crystalline materials with special optical and dielectric behaviors (Fu et al. 2009). With the purpose of obtaining solid crystalline materials of amino compounds, various
have been studied and a series of new salts with this organic molecules have elaborated (Blagden et al. 2008; Vishweshwar, et al. 2006). The synthesis of organic salts often relies on the acid-amide H-bonds interactions. Herein, we report the of the title compound, piperazine-1,4-diium acetate.The
is composed of a quarter piperazine-1,4-diium cation and half acetate anion (Fig.1). The amine N1 atom was protonated. And the carboxyl group was deprotonated to keep the charge balance. The whole anion and N1 atom were located on the ac plane. The geometric parameters of the title compound are in the normal range.In the
all the amino H atoms and hydroxy H atom are involved in intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds interactions with the carboxyl O atoms. These hydrogen bonds link the ionic units into a one-dimentional chain parallel to the c-axis (Table 1 and Fig.2).For the synthesis and properties of related compounds, see: Blagden et al. (2008); Vishweshwar et al. (2006); Fu et al. (2009).
Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell
CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).C4H12N22+·2C2H3O2− | F(000) = 224 |
Mr = 206.24 | Dx = 1.276 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/m | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2y | Cell parameters from 647 reflections |
a = 13.1704 (1) Å | θ = 3.6–27.5° |
b = 7.1820 (2) Å | µ = 0.10 mm−1 |
c = 5.7975 (5) Å | T = 298 K |
β = 101.904 (1)° | Block, colorless |
V = 536.59 (5) Å3 | 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm |
Z = 2 |
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer | 647 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 582 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.018 |
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.6° |
CCD profile fitting scans | h = −16→16 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) | k = −9→5 |
Tmin = 0.90, Tmax = 0.99 | l = −7→6 |
1396 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.140 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.11 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0713P)2 + 0.3322P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
647 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
40 parameters | Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 |
2 restraints | Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3 |
C4H12N22+·2C2H3O2− | V = 536.59 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 206.24 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, C2/m | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 13.1704 (1) Å | µ = 0.10 mm−1 |
b = 7.1820 (2) Å | T = 298 K |
c = 5.7975 (5) Å | 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm |
β = 101.904 (1)° |
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer | 647 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) | 582 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.90, Tmax = 0.99 | Rint = 0.018 |
1396 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048 | 2 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.140 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.11 | Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 |
647 reflections | Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3 |
40 parameters |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
N1 | 0.89057 (12) | 0.5000 | 0.4836 (3) | 0.0360 (5) | |
H1A | 0.8697 | 0.5000 | 0.3256 | 0.054* | |
H1B | 0.8394 | 0.5000 | 0.5653 | 0.054* | |
C3 | 0.95255 (11) | 0.3303 (2) | 0.5542 (3) | 0.0381 (4) | |
H3A | 0.9108 | 0.2210 | 0.5025 | 0.046* | |
H3B | 0.9736 | 0.3257 | 0.7246 | 0.046* | |
O1 | 0.72210 (11) | 0.5000 | 0.6756 (2) | 0.0462 (5) | |
O2 | 0.83814 (11) | 0.5000 | 1.0091 (3) | 0.0448 (5) | |
C1 | 0.74651 (15) | 0.5000 | 0.8955 (3) | 0.0301 (5) | |
C2 | 0.65942 (18) | 0.5000 | 1.0283 (4) | 0.0456 (6) | |
H2A | 0.5936 | 0.5000 | 0.9200 | 0.068* | |
H2B | 0.6649 | 0.3909 | 1.1257 | 0.068* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
N1 | 0.0222 (8) | 0.0626 (12) | 0.0242 (8) | 0.000 | 0.0072 (6) | 0.000 |
C3 | 0.0406 (9) | 0.0424 (8) | 0.0330 (8) | −0.0084 (6) | 0.0113 (6) | 0.0009 (6) |
O1 | 0.0296 (8) | 0.0834 (13) | 0.0263 (8) | 0.000 | 0.0075 (6) | 0.000 |
O2 | 0.0319 (8) | 0.0746 (12) | 0.0277 (8) | 0.000 | 0.0054 (6) | 0.000 |
C1 | 0.0295 (10) | 0.0355 (10) | 0.0270 (9) | 0.000 | 0.0093 (7) | 0.000 |
C2 | 0.0397 (12) | 0.0618 (15) | 0.0410 (12) | 0.000 | 0.0210 (10) | 0.000 |
N1—C3i | 1.4770 (18) | C3—H3B | 0.9700 |
N1—C3 | 1.4770 (18) | O1—C1 | 1.249 (2) |
N1—H1A | 0.9001 | O2—C1 | 1.250 (2) |
N1—H1B | 0.9000 | C1—C2 | 1.507 (3) |
C3—C3ii | 1.511 (3) | C2—H2A | 0.9599 |
C3—H3A | 0.9700 | C2—H2B | 0.9600 |
C3i—N1—C3 | 111.21 (15) | N1—C3—H3B | 109.7 |
C3i—N1—H1A | 108.5 | C3ii—C3—H3B | 109.7 |
C3—N1—H1A | 108.5 | H3A—C3—H3B | 108.2 |
C3i—N1—H1B | 106.6 | O1—C1—O2 | 123.71 (18) |
C3—N1—H1B | 106.6 | O1—C1—C2 | 117.29 (18) |
H1A—N1—H1B | 115.5 | O2—C1—C2 | 119.00 (17) |
N1—C3—C3ii | 110.00 (10) | C1—C2—H2A | 110.2 |
N1—C3—H3A | 109.7 | C1—C2—H2B | 109.1 |
C3ii—C3—H3A | 109.7 | H2A—C2—H2B | 109.5 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1, z; (ii) −x+2, y, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1A···O2iii | 0.90 | 1.80 | 2.694 (2) | 176 |
N1—H1B···O1 | 0.90 | 1.79 | 2.680 (2) | 170 |
Symmetry code: (iii) x, y, z−1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C4H12N22+·2C2H3O2− |
Mr | 206.24 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/m |
Temperature (K) | 298 |
a, b, c (Å) | 13.1704 (1), 7.1820 (2), 5.7975 (5) |
β (°) | 101.904 (1) |
V (Å3) | 536.59 (5) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.10 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Rigaku Mercury2 |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.90, 0.99 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 1396, 647, 582 |
Rint | 0.018 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.649 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.048, 0.140, 1.11 |
No. of reflections | 647 |
No. of parameters | 40 |
No. of restraints | 2 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.29, −0.26 |
Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1A···O2i | 0.90 | 1.80 | 2.694 (2) | 175.7 |
N1—H1B···O1 | 0.90 | 1.79 | 2.680 (2) | 169.5 |
Symmetry code: (i) x, y, z−1. |
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the start-up fund of Anyang Institute of Technology, China.
References
Blagden, N., Berry, D. J., Parkin, A., Javed, H., Ibrahim, A., Gavan, P. T., De Matos, L. L. & Seaton, C. C. (2008). New J. Chem. 32, 1659–1672. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Fu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994–997. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Vishweshwar, P., McMahon, J. A., Bis, J. A. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2006). J. Pharm. Sci. 95, 499–516. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The amino derivatives have found wide range of applications in material science, such as solid crystalline materials with special optical and dielectric behaviors (Fu et al. 2009). With the purpose of obtaining solid crystalline materials of amino compounds, various amines have been studied and a series of new salts with this organic molecules have elaborated (Blagden et al. 2008; Vishweshwar, et al. 2006). The synthesis of organic salts often relies on the acid-amide H-bonds interactions. Herein, we report the crystal structure of the title compound, piperazine-1,4-diium acetate.
The asymmetric unit is composed of a quarter piperazine-1,4-diium cation and half acetate anion (Fig.1). The amine N1 atom was protonated. And the carboxyl group was deprotonated to keep the charge balance. The whole anion and N1 atom were located on the ac plane. The geometric parameters of the title compound are in the normal range.
In the crystal structure, all the amino H atoms and hydroxy H atom are involved in intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds interactions with the carboxyl O atoms. These hydrogen bonds link the ionic units into a one-dimentional chain parallel to the c-axis (Table 1 and Fig.2).