organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Piperazine-1,4-diium di­acetate

aDepartment of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang 455000, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: ayithou@yahoo.com.cn

(Received 4 November 2011; accepted 9 November 2011; online 12 November 2011)

In the title salt, C4H12N22+·2C2H3O2, the piperazine-1,4-diium cation has 2/m symmetry with the NH2 unit located on a mirror plane and the acetate anion has m symmetry with all non-H atoms and one H atom located on a mirror plane. The piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. In the crystal, the cations are linked with the anions via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding into chains parallel to the c axis.

Related literature

For the synthesis and properties of related compounds, see: Blagden et al. (2008[Blagden, N., Berry, D. J., Parkin, A., Javed, H., Ibrahim, A., Gavan, P. T., De Matos, L. L. & Seaton, C. C. (2008). New J. Chem. 32, 1659-1672.]); Vishweshwar et al. (2006[Vishweshwar, P., McMahon, J. A., Bis, J. A. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2006). J. Pharm. Sci. 95, 499-516.]); Fu et al. (2009[Fu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994-997.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C4H12N22+·2C2H3O2

  • Mr = 206.24

  • Monoclinic, C 2/m

  • a = 13.1704 (1) Å

  • b = 7.1820 (2) Å

  • c = 5.7975 (5) Å

  • β = 101.904 (1)°

  • V = 536.59 (5) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm

Data collection
  • Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005[Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.]) Tmin = 0.90, Tmax = 0.99

  • 1396 measured reflections

  • 647 independent reflections

  • 582 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.018

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048

  • wR(F2) = 0.140

  • S = 1.11

  • 647 reflections

  • 40 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O2i 0.90 1.80 2.694 (2) 176
N1—H1B⋯O1 0.90 1.79 2.680 (2) 170
Symmetry code: (i) x, y, z-1.

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005[Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.]); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information


Comment top

The amino derivatives have found wide range of applications in material science, such as solid crystalline materials with special optical and dielectric behaviors (Fu et al. 2009). With the purpose of obtaining solid crystalline materials of amino compounds, various amines have been studied and a series of new salts with this organic molecules have elaborated (Blagden et al. 2008; Vishweshwar, et al. 2006). The synthesis of organic salts often relies on the acid-amide H-bonds interactions. Herein, we report the crystal structure of the title compound, piperazine-1,4-diium acetate.

The asymmetric unit is composed of a quarter piperazine-1,4-diium cation and half acetate anion (Fig.1). The amine N1 atom was protonated. And the carboxyl group was deprotonated to keep the charge balance. The whole anion and N1 atom were located on the ac plane. The geometric parameters of the title compound are in the normal range.

In the crystal structure, all the amino H atoms and hydroxy H atom are involved in intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds interactions with the carboxyl O atoms. These hydrogen bonds link the ionic units into a one-dimentional chain parallel to the c-axis (Table 1 and Fig.2).

Related literature top

For the synthesis and properties of related compounds, see: Blagden et al. (2008); Vishweshwar et al. (2006); Fu et al. (2009).

Experimental top

A mixture of piperazine (2.0 mmol) and acetic acid (2.0 mL) in 20 mL distilled water was refluxed for 5 h, then cooled and filtrated. The filtrate was evaporated slowly in the air. Colorless block crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained after one week.

Refinement top

All H atoms attached to C atoms were fixed geometrically and treated as riding with C—H = 0.97 Å (methylene) and C—H = 0.96 Å (methyl) with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(methylene) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(methyl). H atoms bonded to N atoms were located in difference Fourier map and restrained with the H—N1 = 0.90 (2)Å. In the last stage of refinement they were treated as riding on the N atom with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(N).

Structure description top

The amino derivatives have found wide range of applications in material science, such as solid crystalline materials with special optical and dielectric behaviors (Fu et al. 2009). With the purpose of obtaining solid crystalline materials of amino compounds, various amines have been studied and a series of new salts with this organic molecules have elaborated (Blagden et al. 2008; Vishweshwar, et al. 2006). The synthesis of organic salts often relies on the acid-amide H-bonds interactions. Herein, we report the crystal structure of the title compound, piperazine-1,4-diium acetate.

The asymmetric unit is composed of a quarter piperazine-1,4-diium cation and half acetate anion (Fig.1). The amine N1 atom was protonated. And the carboxyl group was deprotonated to keep the charge balance. The whole anion and N1 atom were located on the ac plane. The geometric parameters of the title compound are in the normal range.

In the crystal structure, all the amino H atoms and hydroxy H atom are involved in intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds interactions with the carboxyl O atoms. These hydrogen bonds link the ionic units into a one-dimentional chain parallel to the c-axis (Table 1 and Fig.2).

For the synthesis and properties of related compounds, see: Blagden et al. (2008); Vishweshwar et al. (2006); Fu et al. (2009).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular view of the title compound with the atomic numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The crystal packing of the title compound viewed along the b axis showing the one-dimensionnal hydrogen bondings chain (dashed line).
Piperazine-1,4-diium diacetate top
Crystal data top
C4H12N22+·2C2H3O2F(000) = 224
Mr = 206.24Dx = 1.276 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yCell parameters from 647 reflections
a = 13.1704 (1) Åθ = 3.6–27.5°
b = 7.1820 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 5.7975 (5) ÅT = 298 K
β = 101.904 (1)°Block, colorless
V = 536.59 (5) Å30.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
647 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube582 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.018
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.6°
CCD profile fitting scansh = 1616
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
k = 95
Tmin = 0.90, Tmax = 0.99l = 76
1396 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.140H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0713P)2 + 0.3322P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
647 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
40 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
2 restraintsΔρmin = 0.26 e Å3
Crystal data top
C4H12N22+·2C2H3O2V = 536.59 (5) Å3
Mr = 206.24Z = 2
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation
a = 13.1704 (1) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 7.1820 (2) ÅT = 298 K
c = 5.7975 (5) Å0.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm
β = 101.904 (1)°
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
647 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
582 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.90, Tmax = 0.99Rint = 0.018
1396 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0482 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.140H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.29 e Å3
647 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.26 e Å3
40 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.89057 (12)0.50000.4836 (3)0.0360 (5)
H1A0.86970.50000.32560.054*
H1B0.83940.50000.56530.054*
C30.95255 (11)0.3303 (2)0.5542 (3)0.0381 (4)
H3A0.91080.22100.50250.046*
H3B0.97360.32570.72460.046*
O10.72210 (11)0.50000.6756 (2)0.0462 (5)
O20.83814 (11)0.50001.0091 (3)0.0448 (5)
C10.74651 (15)0.50000.8955 (3)0.0301 (5)
C20.65942 (18)0.50001.0283 (4)0.0456 (6)
H2A0.59360.50000.92000.068*
H2B0.66490.39091.12570.068*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0222 (8)0.0626 (12)0.0242 (8)0.0000.0072 (6)0.000
C30.0406 (9)0.0424 (8)0.0330 (8)0.0084 (6)0.0113 (6)0.0009 (6)
O10.0296 (8)0.0834 (13)0.0263 (8)0.0000.0075 (6)0.000
O20.0319 (8)0.0746 (12)0.0277 (8)0.0000.0054 (6)0.000
C10.0295 (10)0.0355 (10)0.0270 (9)0.0000.0093 (7)0.000
C20.0397 (12)0.0618 (15)0.0410 (12)0.0000.0210 (10)0.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C3i1.4770 (18)C3—H3B0.9700
N1—C31.4770 (18)O1—C11.249 (2)
N1—H1A0.9001O2—C11.250 (2)
N1—H1B0.9000C1—C21.507 (3)
C3—C3ii1.511 (3)C2—H2A0.9599
C3—H3A0.9700C2—H2B0.9600
C3i—N1—C3111.21 (15)N1—C3—H3B109.7
C3i—N1—H1A108.5C3ii—C3—H3B109.7
C3—N1—H1A108.5H3A—C3—H3B108.2
C3i—N1—H1B106.6O1—C1—O2123.71 (18)
C3—N1—H1B106.6O1—C1—C2117.29 (18)
H1A—N1—H1B115.5O2—C1—C2119.00 (17)
N1—C3—C3ii110.00 (10)C1—C2—H2A110.2
N1—C3—H3A109.7C1—C2—H2B109.1
C3ii—C3—H3A109.7H2A—C2—H2B109.5
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) x+2, y, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O2iii0.901.802.694 (2)176
N1—H1B···O10.901.792.680 (2)170
Symmetry code: (iii) x, y, z1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC4H12N22+·2C2H3O2
Mr206.24
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/m
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)13.1704 (1), 7.1820 (2), 5.7975 (5)
β (°) 101.904 (1)
V3)536.59 (5)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.25 × 0.15
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku Mercury2
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
Tmin, Tmax0.90, 0.99
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
1396, 647, 582
Rint0.018
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.048, 0.140, 1.11
No. of reflections647
No. of parameters40
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.29, 0.26

Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O2i0.901.802.694 (2)175.7
N1—H1B···O10.901.792.680 (2)169.5
Symmetry code: (i) x, y, z1.
 

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the start-up fund of Anyang Institute of Technology, China.

References

First citationBlagden, N., Berry, D. J., Parkin, A., Javed, H., Ibrahim, A., Gavan, P. T., De Matos, L. L. & Seaton, C. C. (2008). New J. Chem. 32, 1659–1672.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationFu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994–997.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationVishweshwar, P., McMahon, J. A., Bis, J. A. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2006). J. Pharm. Sci. 95, 499–516.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds