organic compounds
5-Amino-3-carboxy-1H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ium nitrate monohydrate
aLaboratoire de Chimie Appliquée et Technologie des Matériaux LCATM, Université Larbi Ben M'Hidi, 04000 Oum El Bouaghi, Algeria, bUnité de Recherche de Chimie de l'Environnement et Moléculaire Structurale, CHEMS, Faculté des Sciences Exactes, Université Mentouri Constantine 25000, Algeria, and cCentre de difractométrie X, UMR 6226 CNRS Unité Sciences Chimiques de Rennes, Université de Rennes I, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes, France
*Correspondence e-mail: fadilaber@yahoo.fr
The two-dimensional crystal packing of the title compound, C3H5N4O2+·NO2−·H2O, results from the stacking of well separated layers (i.e. with nothing between the layers) parallel to the (-113) plane in which adjacent cations adopt a head-to-head arrangement such that two –COOH groups are linked via two water molecules (the water O atom behaves simultaneously as donor and acceptor of hydrogen bonds) and two –NH2 groups are linked through two nitrate anions. This arrangement leads to alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic zones in which O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, respectively, are observed.
Related literature
For properties of 1,2,4-triazoles, see: Ouakkaf et al. (2011). For related structures, see: Fernandes et al. (2011); Berrah et al. (2011a,b); Jebas et al. (2006).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2005); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536812011154/pv2522sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812011154/pv2522Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812011154/pv2522Isup3.cml
Colourless crystals of the title compound were grown by slow evaporation of water-methanol (1:1) solution of 5-amino-1,2,4-triazol-1H-3-carboxylic acid hydrate and nitric acid in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio.
The H atoms of the water molecule were located from a difference Fourier map and were refined with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O). The remaining H atoms were located from differnce Fourier maps but introduced in calculated positions and treated as riding on their parent atoms with O—H = 0.82 Å and N—H = 0.86 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N) and 1.5Ueq(O).
Following our on-going interest on crystal structures of hybrid compounds established by hydrogen bonds and in attempts to clarify anion substitution influence upon hydrogen bonding patterns, we have undertaken synthesis of new compounds using 1,2,4-triazol derivatives and various inorganic acids (Ouakkaf et al., 2011). In this article, we report the preparations and
of the title compound.The ≐C3 ≐N2), and two long distances 1.3698 (19) and 1.3779 (18) Å related to the single bonds C2—N2 and N3—N4, respectively.
of the title compound contains a cation, an anion and a water molecule linked by O—H···O and N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Fig.1.) The geometry of the triazole planar ring is similar to that seen in related compounds (Fernandes et al., 2011; Ouakkaf et al., 2011); it exhibits a short distance of 1.3023 (19) Å showing the double-bond formed between atoms C2 and N3, two intermediat bonds (1.3443 (18) and 1.3529 (19) Å) associated with a delocalized double bond (N4The two-dimensional network of the title compound results from the stacking of well separated planar layers parallel to (-113) plane (Fig. 2); analogous networks have been observed in other nitrate compounds (Berrah et al., 2011a,b; Jebas et al., 2006). In each layer, the adjacent cations are oriented in a head to head configuration in such a manner that two –COOH groups are linked via two water molecules (H2O behaves simultaneously as donor and acceptor of hydrogen bonds) and two –NH2groups are linked through two nitrate anions (Fig. 3 and Table 1). This arrangement leads to an alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic zones where O—H···O and N—H···O H-bonds are observed, respectively.
For background information, see: Ouakkaf et al. (2011). For related structures, see: Fernandes et al. (2011); Berrah et al. (2011a,b); Jebas et al. (2006).
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2005); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).Fig. 1. An asymmetric unit of the title compound with the atomic labelling scheme. Displacement are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. | |
Fig. 2. A two-dimensional network of the title compound viewed along the [1–10] direction. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. | |
Fig. 3. A view of the title compound parallel to the (-113 ) plane of the planar infinite layer showing alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic zones involving O—H···O and N—H···O hydrogen bonds, respectively; hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. |
C3H5N4O2+·NO3−·H2O | Z = 2 |
Mr = 209.14 | F(000) = 216 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.729 Mg m−3 |
a = 4.9934 (13) Å | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
b = 6.7454 (17) Å | Cell parameters from 1584 reflections |
c = 12.446 (3) Å | θ = 3.4–27.4° |
α = 97.572 (12)° | µ = 0.17 mm−1 |
β = 100.524 (13)° | T = 150 K |
γ = 98.933 (13)° | Stick, colourless |
V = 401.60 (18) Å3 | 0.42 × 0.2 × 0.11 mm |
Bruker APEXII diffractometer | 1563 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.040 |
CCD rotation images, thin slices scans | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) | h = −6→6 |
Tmin = 0.863, Tmax = 0.982 | k = −6→8 |
4012 measured reflections | l = −16→15 |
1821 independent reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.109 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.03 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0535P)2 + 0.0973P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1821 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
134 parameters | Δρmax = 0.35 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 |
C3H5N4O2+·NO3−·H2O | γ = 98.933 (13)° |
Mr = 209.14 | V = 401.60 (18) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 2 |
a = 4.9934 (13) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 6.7454 (17) Å | µ = 0.17 mm−1 |
c = 12.446 (3) Å | T = 150 K |
α = 97.572 (12)° | 0.42 × 0.2 × 0.11 mm |
β = 100.524 (13)° |
Bruker APEXII diffractometer | 1821 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) | 1563 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.863, Tmax = 0.982 | Rint = 0.040 |
4012 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.109 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.03 | Δρmax = 0.35 e Å−3 |
1821 reflections | Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 |
134 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O1 | −0.1877 (2) | −0.15602 (16) | 0.31865 (9) | 0.0218 (3) | |
N3 | −0.0716 (3) | 0.32704 (19) | 0.20042 (11) | 0.0174 (3) | |
O4 | 0.2001 (2) | 0.80430 (17) | 0.13489 (10) | 0.0241 (3) | |
O5 | −0.2192 (2) | 0.59982 (18) | 0.06811 (10) | 0.0234 (3) | |
H5 | −0.2505 | 0.6888 | 0.0311 | 0.035* | |
O1W | −0.3752 (3) | 0.82557 (19) | −0.06786 (10) | 0.0272 (3) | |
H2W | −0.319 (5) | 0.946 (4) | −0.0762 (18) | 0.041* | |
H1W | −0.544 (5) | 0.791 (3) | −0.1043 (19) | 0.041* | |
N5 | 0.5272 (3) | 0.2985 (2) | 0.39298 (11) | 0.0219 (3) | |
H5A | 0.4999 | 0.185 | 0.4172 | 0.026* | |
H5B | 0.6829 | 0.3811 | 0.4162 | 0.026* | |
O2 | −0.0623 (2) | −0.34292 (17) | 0.44188 (10) | 0.0284 (3) | |
O3 | 0.2143 (2) | −0.06970 (17) | 0.43144 (10) | 0.0262 (3) | |
N2 | 0.3435 (2) | 0.51522 (18) | 0.27273 (10) | 0.0158 (3) | |
H2 | 0.4806 | 0.6154 | 0.2854 | 0.019* | |
N4 | 0.0781 (3) | 0.23345 (19) | 0.27646 (10) | 0.0167 (3) | |
H4 | 0.0176 | 0.1178 | 0.2937 | 0.02* | |
N1 | −0.0104 (3) | −0.18948 (19) | 0.39831 (10) | 0.0171 (3) | |
C3 | 0.3308 (3) | 0.3458 (2) | 0.32034 (12) | 0.0155 (3) | |
C2 | 0.0952 (3) | 0.4958 (2) | 0.20038 (12) | 0.0165 (3) | |
C1 | 0.0296 (3) | 0.6523 (2) | 0.12995 (13) | 0.0175 (3) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O1 | 0.0199 (5) | 0.0212 (6) | 0.0216 (6) | 0.0009 (4) | −0.0034 (4) | 0.0088 (5) |
N3 | 0.0166 (6) | 0.0160 (6) | 0.0191 (7) | 0.0023 (5) | −0.0004 (5) | 0.0077 (5) |
O4 | 0.0237 (6) | 0.0185 (6) | 0.0289 (6) | −0.0007 (5) | 0.0009 (5) | 0.0109 (5) |
O5 | 0.0219 (6) | 0.0198 (6) | 0.0261 (6) | 0.0013 (5) | −0.0043 (5) | 0.0114 (5) |
O1W | 0.0219 (6) | 0.0221 (6) | 0.0343 (7) | −0.0020 (5) | −0.0057 (5) | 0.0159 (5) |
N5 | 0.0150 (6) | 0.0186 (7) | 0.0293 (8) | −0.0034 (5) | −0.0034 (5) | 0.0123 (6) |
O2 | 0.0274 (6) | 0.0189 (6) | 0.0339 (7) | −0.0075 (5) | −0.0047 (5) | 0.0156 (5) |
O3 | 0.0183 (6) | 0.0212 (6) | 0.0334 (7) | −0.0073 (5) | −0.0039 (5) | 0.0105 (5) |
N2 | 0.0135 (6) | 0.0134 (6) | 0.0190 (6) | −0.0007 (5) | 0.0002 (5) | 0.0060 (5) |
N4 | 0.0149 (6) | 0.0150 (6) | 0.0195 (6) | 0.0004 (5) | −0.0011 (5) | 0.0095 (5) |
N1 | 0.0166 (6) | 0.0139 (6) | 0.0195 (7) | −0.0002 (5) | 0.0015 (5) | 0.0047 (5) |
C3 | 0.0153 (7) | 0.0134 (7) | 0.0177 (7) | 0.0016 (5) | 0.0023 (6) | 0.0045 (6) |
C2 | 0.0151 (7) | 0.0153 (7) | 0.0182 (7) | 0.0021 (5) | 0.0008 (6) | 0.0042 (6) |
C1 | 0.0201 (7) | 0.0136 (7) | 0.0187 (7) | 0.0022 (6) | 0.0031 (6) | 0.0053 (6) |
O1—N1 | 1.2720 (16) | N5—H5B | 0.86 |
N3—C2 | 1.3023 (19) | O2—N1 | 1.2443 (16) |
N3—N4 | 1.3779 (18) | O3—N1 | 1.2426 (16) |
O4—C1 | 1.2139 (18) | N2—C3 | 1.3529 (19) |
O5—C1 | 1.3051 (19) | N2—C2 | 1.3698 (19) |
O5—H5 | 0.82 | N2—H2 | 0.86 |
O1W—H2W | 0.84 (3) | N4—C3 | 1.3443 (18) |
O1W—H1W | 0.86 (2) | N4—H4 | 0.86 |
N5—C3 | 1.3155 (19) | C2—C1 | 1.495 (2) |
N5—H5A | 0.86 | ||
C2—N3—N4 | 103.98 (12) | O3—N1—O2 | 120.44 (13) |
C1—O5—H5 | 109.5 | O3—N1—O1 | 119.79 (12) |
H2W—O1W—H1W | 107 (2) | O2—N1—O1 | 119.77 (12) |
C3—N5—H5A | 120 | N5—C3—N4 | 126.95 (13) |
C3—N5—H5B | 120 | N5—C3—N2 | 127.13 (13) |
H5A—N5—H5B | 120 | N4—C3—N2 | 105.91 (12) |
C3—N2—C2 | 106.57 (12) | N3—C2—N2 | 112.16 (13) |
C3—N2—H2 | 126.7 | N3—C2—C1 | 124.96 (14) |
C2—N2—H2 | 126.7 | N2—C2—C1 | 122.89 (13) |
C3—N4—N3 | 111.38 (12) | O4—C1—O5 | 128.33 (15) |
C3—N4—H4 | 124.3 | O4—C1—C2 | 120.16 (14) |
N3—N4—H4 | 124.3 | O5—C1—C2 | 111.50 (13) |
C2—N3—N4—C3 | −0.23 (16) | C3—N2—C2—N3 | 0.52 (17) |
N3—N4—C3—N5 | −178.18 (15) | C3—N2—C2—C1 | −179.10 (13) |
N3—N4—C3—N2 | 0.55 (16) | N3—C2—C1—O4 | −179.23 (15) |
C2—N2—C3—N5 | 178.10 (15) | N2—C2—C1—O4 | 0.3 (2) |
C2—N2—C3—N4 | −0.62 (15) | N3—C2—C1—O5 | 0.5 (2) |
N4—N3—C2—N2 | −0.18 (16) | N2—C2—C1—O5 | −179.93 (13) |
N4—N3—C2—C1 | 179.43 (14) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O5—H5···O1W | 0.82 | 1.72 | 2.5210 (17) | 166 |
O1W—H2W···O4i | 0.84 (3) | 1.97 (3) | 2.7985 (18) | 166 (2) |
O1W—H1W···N3ii | 0.86 (2) | 2.05 (3) | 2.9011 (19) | 172 (2) |
N5—H5A···O3 | 0.86 | 2.1 | 2.8672 (18) | 148 |
N5—H5A···O3iii | 0.86 | 2.44 | 3.0498 (19) | 129 |
N5—H5B···O2iv | 0.86 | 2.04 | 2.8352 (18) | 154 |
N5—H5B···O2iii | 0.86 | 2.41 | 3.0060 (18) | 127 |
N2—H2···O1iv | 0.86 | 2.02 | 2.8790 (17) | 178 |
N4—H4···O1 | 0.86 | 2.06 | 2.9112 (18) | 171 |
N4—H4···O3 | 0.86 | 2.42 | 3.0590 (18) | 132 |
N4—H4···N1 | 0.86 | 2.59 | 3.4099 (19) | 160 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+2, −z; (ii) −x−1, −y+1, −z; (iii) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iv) x+1, y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C3H5N4O2+·NO3−·H2O |
Mr | 209.14 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 150 |
a, b, c (Å) | 4.9934 (13), 6.7454 (17), 12.446 (3) |
α, β, γ (°) | 97.572 (12), 100.524 (13), 98.933 (13) |
V (Å3) | 401.60 (18) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.17 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.42 × 0.2 × 0.11 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.863, 0.982 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 4012, 1821, 1563 |
Rint | 0.040 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.649 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.040, 0.109, 1.03 |
No. of reflections | 1821 |
No. of parameters | 134 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.35, −0.29 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006), SAINT (Bruker, 2006), SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2005), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 2001), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O5—H5···O1W | 0.82 | 1.72 | 2.5210 (17) | 165.6 |
O1W—H2W···O4i | 0.84 (3) | 1.97 (3) | 2.7985 (18) | 166 (2) |
O1W—H1W···N3ii | 0.86 (2) | 2.05 (3) | 2.9011 (19) | 172 (2) |
N5—H5B···O2iii | 0.86 | 2.04 | 2.8352 (18) | 154.3 |
N2—H2···O1iii | 0.86 | 2.02 | 2.8790 (17) | 177.7 |
N4—H4···O1 | 0.86 | 2.06 | 2.9112 (18) | 170.7 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+2, −z; (ii) −x−1, −y+1, −z; (iii) x+1, y+1, z. |
Footnotes
‡Département Sciences de la Matière, Faculté des Sciences Exactes et Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université Larbi Ben M'hidi, 04000 Oum El Bouaghi, Algeria
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the LCATM laboratory, Université Larbi Ben M'Hidi, Oum El Bouaghi, Algeria, for financial support.
References
Berrah, F., Bouacida, S. & Roisnel, T. (2011a). Acta Cryst. E67, o2057–o2058. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Berrah, F., Ouakkaf, A., Bouacida, S. & Roisnel, T. (2011b). Acta Cryst. E67, o525–o526. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. & Berndt, M. (2001). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruker (2006). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Burla, M. C., Caliandro, R., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., De Caro, L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (2005). J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 381–388. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fernandes, J. A., Liu, B., Tomé, J. C., Cunha-Silva, L. & Almeida Paz, F. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o2073–o2074. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Jebas, S. R., Balasubramanian, T. & Light, M. E. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o3481–o3482. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ouakkaf, A., Berrah, F., Bouacida, S. & Roisnel, T. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1171–o1172. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2002). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Following our on-going interest on crystal structures of hybrid compounds established by hydrogen bonds and in attempts to clarify anion substitution influence upon hydrogen bonding patterns, we have undertaken synthesis of new compounds using 1,2,4-triazol derivatives and various inorganic acids (Ouakkaf et al., 2011). In this article, we report the preparations and crystal structure of the title compound.
The asymmetric unit of the title compound contains a cation, an anion and a water molecule linked by O—H···O and N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Fig.1.) The geometry of the triazole planar ring is similar to that seen in related compounds (Fernandes et al., 2011; Ouakkaf et al., 2011); it exhibits a short distance of 1.3023 (19) Å showing the double-bond formed between atoms C2 and N3, two intermediat bonds (1.3443 (18) and 1.3529 (19) Å) associated with a delocalized double bond (N4 ≐C3 ≐N2), and two long distances 1.3698 (19) and 1.3779 (18) Å related to the single bonds C2—N2 and N3—N4, respectively.
The two-dimensional network of the title compound results from the stacking of well separated planar layers parallel to (-113) plane (Fig. 2); analogous networks have been observed in other nitrate compounds (Berrah et al., 2011a,b; Jebas et al., 2006). In each layer, the adjacent cations are oriented in a head to head configuration in such a manner that two –COOH groups are linked via two water molecules (H2O behaves simultaneously as donor and acceptor of hydrogen bonds) and two –NH2groups are linked through two nitrate anions (Fig. 3 and Table 1). This arrangement leads to an alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic zones where O—H···O and N—H···O H-bonds are observed, respectively.