Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 68| Part 4| April 2012| Pages m469-m470
doi:10.1107/S1600536812009919

Bis(methacrylato-κO)bis­­(2,4,6-tri­methyl­pyridine-κN)copper(II)

Ejaz,a Islam Ullah Khan,a* Alina Murtazaa and William T. A. Harrisonb

aMaterials Chemistry Laboratry, Department of Chemistry, GC University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan, and bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland
*Correspondence e-mail: iuklodhi@yahoo.com

(Received 30 September 2011; accepted 6 March 2012; online 24 March 2012)

In the monomeric title complex, [Cu(C4H5O2)2(C8H11N)2], the CuII atom lies on a centre of inversion. Its coordination by two substituted pyridine ligands and two carboxyl­ate anions leads to a slightly distorted trans-CuN2O2 square-planar geometry. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the pyridine (py) ring and the carboxyl­ate group is 74.71 (7)°. The dihedral angles between the planar CuN2O2 core and the py ring and carboxyl­ate plane are 67.72 (5) and 89.95 (5)°, respectively. Based on the refined C=C and C—C bond lengths, the terminal =CH2 and –CH3 groups of the carboxyl­ate anion may be disordered, but the disorder could not be resolved in the present experiment. Several intra­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions occur. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, generating chains propagating in [100].

Related literature

For the crystal structures of related monomeric complexes containing a trans-CuN2O2 core, see: Borel et al. (1981[Borel, M. M., Busnot, A., Busnot, F., Leclaire, A. & Bernard, M. A. (1981). Rev. Chem. Mineral. 18, 74-82.]); Heimer & Ahmed (1982[Heimer, N. E. & Ahmed, I. V. (1982). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 65, L65-L66.]); Jedrzejas et al. (1994[Jedrzejas, M. J., Towns, R. L. R., Baker, R. J., Duraj, S. A. & Hepp, A. F. (1994). Acta Cryst. C50, 1442-1443.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(C4H5O2)2(C8H11N)2]

  • Mr = 476.06

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /n

  • a = 8.2295 (2) Å

  • b = 17.0921 (6) Å

  • c = 9.1683 (3) Å

  • β = 109.220 (1)°

  • V = 1217.73 (7) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.93 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.08 × 0.06 × 0.06 mm
Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.930, Tmax = 0.947

  • 11795 measured reflections

  • 3017 independent reflections

  • 2439 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.030
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032

  • wR(F2) = 0.098

  • S = 1.05

  • 3017 reflections

  • 146 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.24 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu1—O2 1.9406 (12)
Cu1—N1 2.0404 (14)
O2—Cu1—N1 91.73 (6)

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
C4—H4⋯O1i 0.93 2.45 3.338 (2) 161
C6—H6A⋯O1 0.96 2.49 3.369 (3) 153
C6—H6C⋯O2ii 0.96 2.48 3.139 (3) 126
C8—H8A⋯O1ii 0.96 2.49 3.357 (3) 150
C8—H8C⋯O2 0.96 2.51 3.124 (2) 122
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) -x+1, -y+1, -z+1.

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812009919/rn2095sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812009919/rn2095Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report


Comment top

The title compound, (I), is a centrosymmetric neutral monomeric copper(II) complex (Fig. 1). Related structures containing a copper(II) ion bonded to a pair of susbtituted pyridine ligands and a pair of monodentate carboxylate anions have been described previously (Borel et al., 1981; Heimer & Ahmed, 1982; Jedrzejas et al., 1994).

The Cu ion in (I) lies on an inversion centre, resulting in a slightly distorted trans-CuN2O2 square planar geometry for the metal ion (Table 1). If a very long contact between Cu1 and O1 [2.8229 (17)Å] is considered to have any significance as a bond, a grossly disorted trans-CuN2O4 octahedron results. The mean planes of the pyridine ring (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0099Å) and the carboxylate group (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0003Å) are roughly perpendicular [dihedral angle = 74.71 (7)°], which presumably minimises steric interactions between the ligands. The dihedral angles between the planar CuN2O2 core and the py ring and carboxylate plane are are 67.72 (5) and 89.95 (5)°, respectively. The Cu ion is displaced by 0.256 (3)Å from the py ring plane and by 0.252 (3)Å from the carboxylate plane. The carboxylate C—O bond lengths of 1.222 (2)Å for O1 and 1.276 (2)Å for O2 suggest the presence of relatively localised single and double bonds in the anion.

The terminal CH2 and CH3 groups of the carboxylate anion are probably disordered: the nominal C10—C11 single bond is short [1.422 (4)Å] and the nominal C10=C12 double bond is long [1.378 (4)Å]. This may also correlate with the Hirshfeld rigid bond alert for the C10—C12 bond. The presumed disorder could not be resolved in the present experiment. Several intramolecular C—H···O interactions occur (Table 1). In the crystal, the molecules are linked by C—H···O hydrogen bonds to generate chains in the [100] direction.

In trans-bis(acetato-O)bis(4-methyl pyridine-N)copper(II) (Jedrzejas et al., 1994), (II), the dihedral angle between the ligands is 78.2° (s.u. not stated), and the dihedral angle between the py ring and the CuN2O2 plane is 31.6°. The uncoordinated Cu···O separation of 2.623 (4)Å in (II) is significantly shorter than that seen in (I). However, it is notable that the carboxylate C—O bonds lengths in (II) [1.227 (7) and 1.279 (6)Å] are almost identical to those seen here.

Related literature top

For the crystal structures of related monomeric complexes containing a trans-CuN2O2 core, see: Borel et al. (1981); Heimer & Ahmed (1982); Jedrzejas et al. (1994).

Experimental top

Copper sulfate (0.16 g, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (20 ml). Then, 2,4,6-trimethyl pyridine (0.264 ml, 2.0 mmol) was added to this solution, which turned green. This reaction mixture was refluxed for 30 minutes followed by addition of methacrylic acid (0.169 ml, 2.0 mmol), at which point the solution remained green. After refluxing for one hour, the solution was filtered and kept for a few days. Blue-green blocks of (I) were obtained from filtrate by slow evaporation.

Refinement top

Attempts were made to represent the disordered C11 (nominal CH2 group) and C12 (nominal CH3 group) atoms with a double-site model, but the refinement was unstable. The hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.93–0.96Å) and refined as riding atoms with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(methyl C). The methyl groups were allowed to rotate, but not to tip, to best fit the electron density.

Structure description top

The title compound, (I), is a centrosymmetric neutral monomeric copper(II) complex (Fig. 1). Related structures containing a copper(II) ion bonded to a pair of susbtituted pyridine ligands and a pair of monodentate carboxylate anions have been described previously (Borel et al., 1981; Heimer & Ahmed, 1982; Jedrzejas et al., 1994).

The Cu ion in (I) lies on an inversion centre, resulting in a slightly distorted trans-CuN2O2 square planar geometry for the metal ion (Table 1). If a very long contact between Cu1 and O1 [2.8229 (17)Å] is considered to have any significance as a bond, a grossly disorted trans-CuN2O4 octahedron results. The mean planes of the pyridine ring (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0099Å) and the carboxylate group (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0003Å) are roughly perpendicular [dihedral angle = 74.71 (7)°], which presumably minimises steric interactions between the ligands. The dihedral angles between the planar CuN2O2 core and the py ring and carboxylate plane are are 67.72 (5) and 89.95 (5)°, respectively. The Cu ion is displaced by 0.256 (3)Å from the py ring plane and by 0.252 (3)Å from the carboxylate plane. The carboxylate C—O bond lengths of 1.222 (2)Å for O1 and 1.276 (2)Å for O2 suggest the presence of relatively localised single and double bonds in the anion.

The terminal CH2 and CH3 groups of the carboxylate anion are probably disordered: the nominal C10—C11 single bond is short [1.422 (4)Å] and the nominal C10=C12 double bond is long [1.378 (4)Å]. This may also correlate with the Hirshfeld rigid bond alert for the C10—C12 bond. The presumed disorder could not be resolved in the present experiment. Several intramolecular C—H···O interactions occur (Table 1). In the crystal, the molecules are linked by C—H···O hydrogen bonds to generate chains in the [100] direction.

In trans-bis(acetato-O)bis(4-methyl pyridine-N)copper(II) (Jedrzejas et al., 1994), (II), the dihedral angle between the ligands is 78.2° (s.u. not stated), and the dihedral angle between the py ring and the CuN2O2 plane is 31.6°. The uncoordinated Cu···O separation of 2.623 (4)Å in (II) is significantly shorter than that seen in (I). However, it is notable that the carboxylate C—O bonds lengths in (II) [1.227 (7) and 1.279 (6)Å] are almost identical to those seen here.

For the crystal structures of related monomeric complexes containing a trans-CuN2O2 core, see: Borel et al. (1981); Heimer & Ahmed (1982); Jedrzejas et al. (1994).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I) showing 50% displacement ellipsoids. Symmetry code: (i) 1–x, 1–y, 1–z.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Fragment of a [100] chain of complex molecules linked by C—H···O hydrogen bonds (double dashed lines). Symmetry code: (i) 1+x, y, z.
Bis(methacrylato-κO)bis(2,4,6-trimethylpyridine-κN)copper(II) top
Crystal data top
[Cu(C4H5O2)2(C8H11N)2]F(000) = 502
Mr = 476.06Dx = 1.298 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 3020 reflections
a = 8.2295 (2) Åθ = 2.4–28.3°
b = 17.0921 (6) ŵ = 0.93 mm−1
c = 9.1683 (3) ÅT = 296 K
β = 109.220 (1)°Block, blue-green
V = 1217.73 (7) Å30.08 × 0.06 × 0.06 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer		3017 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2439 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.030
ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2007)		h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.930, Tmax = 0.947k = −22→21
11795 measured reflectionsl = −12→12
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.098H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0554P)2 + 0.2257P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3017 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
146 parametersΔρmax = 0.24 e Å−3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å−3
Crystal data top
[Cu(C4H5O2)2(C8H11N)2]V = 1217.73 (7) Å3
Mr = 476.06Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 8.2295 (2) ŵ = 0.93 mm−1
b = 17.0921 (6) ÅT = 296 K
c = 9.1683 (3) Å0.08 × 0.06 × 0.06 mm
β = 109.220 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer		3017 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2007)		2439 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.930, Tmax = 0.947Rint = 0.030
11795 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0320 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.098H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.24 e Å−3
3017 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å−3
146 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.50000.50000.50000.03574 (11)
N10.66520 (18)0.59275 (8)0.54344 (15)0.0370 (3)
C10.6584 (2)0.64975 (10)0.64342 (19)0.0418 (4)
C20.7823 (2)0.70758 (11)0.6865 (2)0.0468 (4)
H20.77400.74650.75460.056*
C50.7941 (2)0.59402 (10)0.48251 (18)0.0381 (3)
C90.2632 (2)0.57402 (11)0.2626 (2)0.0437 (4)
C30.9184 (2)0.70825 (11)0.6297 (2)0.0481 (4)
C80.7956 (2)0.53238 (12)0.3681 (2)0.0473 (4)
H8A0.79290.48170.41240.071*
H8B0.89840.53720.34100.071*
H8C0.69670.53850.27720.071*
C40.9208 (2)0.65059 (11)0.5248 (2)0.0456 (4)
H41.00890.64990.48210.055*
C60.5137 (3)0.64778 (13)0.7083 (3)0.0599 (5)
H6A0.40610.64560.62530.090*
H6B0.51730.69400.76860.090*
H6C0.52500.60240.77250.090*
C100.1618 (3)0.59108 (12)0.0974 (2)0.0568 (5)
C71.0593 (3)0.76821 (15)0.6826 (4)0.0776 (7)
H7A1.01130.81740.69860.116*
H7B1.11370.77430.60530.116*
H7C1.14290.75130.77760.116*
C11−0.0020 (4)0.62688 (19)0.0676 (4)0.0899 (9)
H11A−0.05570.6336−0.04180.135*
H11B0.01230.67700.11750.135*
H11C−0.07300.59420.10690.135*
C120.2280 (5)0.57196 (18)−0.0179 (3)0.0934 (9)
H12A0.16500.5824−0.12050.112*
H12B0.33580.54860.00700.112*
O10.2181 (2)0.60068 (11)0.36686 (17)0.0675 (4)
O20.39586 (16)0.53088 (9)0.28566 (14)0.0477 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.03618 (17)0.03855 (17)0.03315 (16)0.00306 (11)0.01229 (11)−0.00093 (11)
N10.0376 (7)0.0391 (7)0.0338 (7)0.0041 (6)0.0111 (5)−0.0006 (5)
C10.0445 (9)0.0422 (9)0.0369 (8)0.0073 (7)0.0111 (7)−0.0017 (7)
C20.0508 (10)0.0402 (9)0.0429 (9)0.0065 (8)0.0067 (8)−0.0061 (7)
C50.0382 (8)0.0397 (8)0.0357 (8)0.0064 (7)0.0110 (6)0.0032 (6)
C90.0429 (9)0.0445 (9)0.0413 (9)−0.0048 (7)0.0105 (7)0.0056 (7)
C30.0410 (9)0.0397 (9)0.0554 (10)0.0020 (7)0.0048 (8)0.0008 (8)
C80.0463 (10)0.0512 (10)0.0501 (10)0.0021 (8)0.0234 (8)−0.0064 (9)
C40.0385 (9)0.0440 (9)0.0541 (10)0.0036 (7)0.0148 (8)0.0042 (8)
C60.0649 (12)0.0605 (12)0.0639 (12)0.0007 (10)0.0341 (10)−0.0178 (10)
C100.0626 (12)0.0492 (11)0.0448 (10)−0.0087 (9)−0.0011 (9)0.0090 (8)
C70.0593 (14)0.0602 (14)0.105 (2)−0.0122 (11)0.0164 (13)−0.0197 (14)
C110.0769 (17)0.089 (2)0.0811 (18)0.0016 (15)−0.0048 (13)0.0307 (16)
C120.131 (2)0.101 (2)0.0391 (11)0.0127 (19)0.0155 (13)−0.0022 (13)
O10.0591 (9)0.0941 (12)0.0519 (8)0.0208 (8)0.0218 (7)0.0076 (8)
O20.0486 (7)0.0534 (7)0.0385 (6)0.0038 (6)0.0109 (5)0.0035 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O21.9406 (12)C8—H8A0.9600
Cu1—O2i1.9406 (12)C8—H8B0.9600
Cu1—N1i2.0404 (14)C8—H8C0.9600
Cu1—N12.0404 (14)C4—H40.9300
N1—C11.352 (2)C6—H6A0.9600
N1—C51.352 (2)C6—H6B0.9600
C1—C21.381 (3)C6—H6C0.9600
C1—C61.496 (3)C10—C121.378 (4)
C2—C31.382 (3)C10—C111.422 (4)
C2—H20.9300C7—H7A0.9600
C5—C41.381 (3)C7—H7B0.9600
C5—C81.490 (2)C7—H7C0.9600
C9—O11.222 (2)C11—H11A0.9600
C9—O21.276 (2)C11—H11B0.9600
C9—C101.498 (3)C11—H11C0.9600
C3—C41.382 (3)C12—H12A0.9300
C3—C71.503 (3)C12—H12B0.9300
O2—Cu1—O2i180.0H8B—C8—H8C109.5
O2—Cu1—N1i88.27 (6)C5—C4—C3120.81 (17)
O2i—Cu1—N1i91.73 (6)C5—C4—H4119.6
O2—Cu1—N191.73 (6)C3—C4—H4119.6
O2i—Cu1—N188.27 (6)C1—C6—H6A109.5
N1i—Cu1—N1180.0C1—C6—H6B109.5
C1—N1—C5118.81 (15)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
C1—N1—Cu1121.25 (11)C1—C6—H6C109.5
C5—N1—Cu1119.66 (11)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
N1—C1—C2121.22 (16)H6B—C6—H6C109.5
N1—C1—C6118.00 (16)C12—C10—C11122.9 (2)
C2—C1—C6120.77 (16)C12—C10—C9120.0 (2)
C1—C2—C3120.78 (17)C11—C10—C9117.1 (2)
C1—C2—H2119.6C3—C7—H7A109.5
C3—C2—H2119.6C3—C7—H7B109.5
N1—C5—C4121.21 (15)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
N1—C5—C8117.99 (15)C3—C7—H7C109.5
C4—C5—C8120.81 (15)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
O1—C9—O2123.32 (17)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
O1—C9—C10120.46 (18)C10—C11—H11A109.5
O2—C9—C10116.23 (17)C10—C11—H11B109.5
C4—C3—C2117.10 (17)H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C4—C3—C7121.63 (19)C10—C11—H11C109.5
C2—C3—C7121.26 (19)H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C8—H8A109.5H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C8—H8B109.5C10—C12—H12A120.0
H8A—C8—H8B109.5C10—C12—H12B120.0
C5—C8—H8C109.5H12A—C12—H12B120.0
H8A—C8—H8C109.5C9—O2—Cu1113.19 (11)
O2—Cu1—N1—C1115.81 (13)C1—C2—C3—C42.3 (3)
O2i—Cu1—N1—C1−64.19 (13)C1—C2—C3—C7−176.5 (2)
O2—Cu1—N1—C5−70.31 (12)N1—C5—C4—C3−0.7 (3)
O2i—Cu1—N1—C5109.69 (12)C8—C5—C4—C3179.34 (17)
C5—N1—C1—C2−1.6 (2)C2—C3—C4—C5−1.5 (3)
Cu1—N1—C1—C2172.38 (13)C7—C3—C4—C5177.2 (2)
C5—N1—C1—C6179.36 (16)O1—C9—C10—C12169.3 (2)
Cu1—N1—C1—C6−6.7 (2)O2—C9—C10—C12−10.8 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C3−0.7 (3)O1—C9—C10—C11−10.9 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C3178.31 (18)O2—C9—C10—C11169.0 (2)
C1—N1—C5—C42.3 (2)O1—C9—O2—Cu18.1 (2)
Cu1—N1—C5—C4−171.75 (12)C10—C9—O2—Cu1−171.85 (13)
C1—N1—C5—C8−177.78 (16)N1i—Cu1—O2—C986.87 (13)
Cu1—N1—C5—C88.2 (2)N1—Cu1—O2—C9−93.13 (13)
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C4—H4···O1ii0.932.453.338 (2)161
C6—H6A···O10.962.493.369 (3)153
C6—H6C···O2i0.962.483.139 (3)126
C8—H8A···O1i0.962.493.357 (3)150
C8—H8C···O20.962.513.124 (2)122
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x+1, y, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu(C4H5O2)2(C8H11N)2]
Mr476.06
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)296
a, b, c (Å)8.2295 (2), 17.0921 (6), 9.1683 (3)
β (°) 109.220 (1)
V (Å3)1217.73 (7)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm−1)0.93
Crystal size (mm)0.08 × 0.06 × 0.06
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2007)
Tmin, Tmax0.930, 0.947
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections		11795, 3017, 2439
Rint0.030
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.667
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.032, 0.098, 1.05
No. of reflections3017
No. of parameters146
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.24, −0.21

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007), SAINT (Bruker, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O21.9406 (12)Cu1—N12.0404 (14)
O2—Cu1—N191.73 (6)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C4—H4···O1i0.932.453.338 (2)161
C6—H6A···O10.962.493.369 (3)153
C6—H6C···O2ii0.962.483.139 (3)126
C8—H8A···O1ii0.962.493.357 (3)150
C8—H8C···O20.962.513.124 (2)122
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

IUK thanks the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for its financial support under the project to strengthen the Materials Chemistry Laboratory at GCUL.

References

First citationBorel, M. M., Busnot, A., Busnot, F., Leclaire, A. & Bernard, M. A. (1981). Rev. Chem. Mineral. 18, 74–82.  CAS Google Scholar
 First citationBruker (2007). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationHeimer, N. E. & Ahmed, I. V. (1982). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 65, L65–L66.  CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationJedrzejas, M. J., Towns, R. L. R., Baker, R. J., Duraj, S. A. & Hepp, A. F. (1994). Acta Cryst. C50, 1442–1443.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 68| Part 4| April 2012| Pages m469-m470
doi:10.1107/S1600536812009919
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS