organic compounds
Bis(2-aminopyridinium) 2,5-dicarboxybenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate
aCEMDRX, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, P-3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal, and bDepartment of Chemistry, Payame Noor University, 19395-4697 Tehran, Iran
*Correspondence e-mail: vhugo@fis.uc.pt
In the title compound, 2C5H7N2+·C10H4O82−, the 2-aminopyridinium (2-apyH) cation and 2,5-dicarboxybenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate (btcH2) anion are both nearly planar, with r.m.s. deviations of 0.015 and 0.050 Å, respectively. The angle between the latter least-squares planes is 17.68 (9)°. The overall results from the packing of two-dimensional networks, formed by alternating 2-apyH and btcH2 linked by hydrogen bonds, parallel to (100).
Related literature
For similar and most common conformations of 2-aminopyridinium, see: Guelmami & Jouini (2011); Chitra et al. (2008); Quah et al. (2008); Bis & Zaworotko (2005); Büyükgüngör & Odabas˛ogˇlu (2002); Odabas˛ogˇlu et al. (2003); Acheson (1967). For similar and most common conformations of 2,5-dicarboxybenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate, see: Dong et al. (2011); Wang & Tang (2010). For graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals, see: Etter et al. (1990).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker–Nonius, 2004); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536812017254/bt5880sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812017254/bt5880Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812017254/bt5880Isup3.cml
A solution of 0.254 g (1 mmol) benzene-1,2,4,5-tetracarboxylicacid in methanol (10 ml) was added to a solution of 2-aminopyridine (0.1 g, 1 mmol) in water (15 ml), and refluxed for 1 h. The resulting solution was light yellow in colour. After slow evaporation of the solvent at room-temperature colorless prisms of the compound were obtained.
The structure was solved by
using SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008). H atoms bound to aromatic C were placed at idealized positions and refined as riding, with C—H=0.93 (Sheldrick, 2008); amine and carboxyl H atoms were found from a difference fourier map and their coordinates refined freely. Uiso(H) was fixed to 1.2 times Ueq of the heavy atom they are bonded to, for all hydrogen atoms.Examination of the
with PLATON (Spek, 2009) showed that there are no solvent-accessible voids in the crystal lattice.Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker–Nonius, 2004); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).Fig. 1. ORTEPII plot of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% level. | |
Fig. 2. Representation of the two-dimensional networks, paralell to the (100) planes, of H-bonded molecules. |
2C5H7N2+·C10H4O82− | F(000) = 460 |
Mr = 442.38 | Dx = 1.603 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 7209 reflections |
a = 4.0165 (1) Å | θ = 2.7–24.9° |
b = 10.8098 (4) Å | µ = 0.13 mm−1 |
c = 21.4036 (7) Å | T = 273 K |
β = 99.535 (2)° | Block, yellow |
V = 916.45 (5) Å3 | 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.15 mm |
Z = 2 |
Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2209 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1652 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.024 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 28.2°, θmin = 1.9° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) | h = −4→5 |
Tmin = 0.755, Tmax = 1.000 | k = −13→14 |
18838 measured reflections | l = −27→23 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.102 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0519P)2 + 0.1584P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.01 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
2209 reflections | Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 |
158 parameters | Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.014 (3) |
2C5H7N2+·C10H4O82− | V = 916.45 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 442.38 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 4.0165 (1) Å | µ = 0.13 mm−1 |
b = 10.8098 (4) Å | T = 273 K |
c = 21.4036 (7) Å | 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.15 mm |
β = 99.535 (2)° |
Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2209 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) | 1652 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.755, Tmax = 1.000 | Rint = 0.024 |
18838 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.102 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.01 | Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 |
2209 reflections | Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 |
158 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
N1 | 1.1547 (3) | 0.04940 (11) | 0.38178 (5) | 0.0424 (3) | |
H1A | 1.040 (4) | 0.1095 (15) | 0.3993 (8) | 0.051* | |
C1 | 1.1679 (3) | 0.04905 (12) | 0.32019 (6) | 0.0370 (3) | |
N2 | 1.0229 (4) | 0.14007 (12) | 0.28496 (6) | 0.0511 (3) | |
H2A | 1.021 (4) | 0.1363 (16) | 0.2461 (9) | 0.061* | |
H2B | 0.916 (5) | 0.1990 (16) | 0.3019 (9) | 0.061* | |
C3 | 1.3390 (4) | −0.04878 (13) | 0.29700 (7) | 0.0469 (4) | |
H3 | 1.3508 | −0.0532 | 0.2540 | 0.056* | |
C4 | 1.4882 (4) | −0.13741 (15) | 0.33704 (9) | 0.0569 (4) | |
H4 | 1.6042 | −0.2019 | 0.3215 | 0.068* | |
C5 | 1.4684 (4) | −0.13228 (16) | 0.40058 (9) | 0.0587 (4) | |
H5 | 1.5712 | −0.1922 | 0.4285 | 0.070* | |
C6 | 1.2984 (4) | −0.03922 (15) | 0.42096 (7) | 0.0523 (4) | |
H6 | 1.2786 | −0.0356 | 0.4636 | 0.063* | |
C7 | 0.7030 (3) | 0.40755 (11) | 0.52514 (6) | 0.0325 (3) | |
H7 | 0.8444 | 0.3440 | 0.5427 | 0.039* | |
C8 | 0.5869 (3) | 0.40386 (11) | 0.46123 (5) | 0.0312 (3) | |
C9 | 0.7148 (3) | 0.29317 (12) | 0.42838 (6) | 0.0380 (3) | |
O1 | 0.6529 (3) | 0.28618 (10) | 0.36938 (5) | 0.0588 (3) | |
O2 | 0.8806 (3) | 0.21344 (9) | 0.45984 (5) | 0.0591 (3) | |
C10 | 0.3760 (3) | 0.50071 (11) | 0.43487 (5) | 0.0315 (3) | |
C11 | 0.2130 (3) | 0.52081 (12) | 0.36717 (6) | 0.0386 (3) | |
O3 | 0.0283 (3) | 0.60888 (10) | 0.35332 (5) | 0.0571 (3) | |
O4 | 0.2721 (3) | 0.44339 (10) | 0.32502 (4) | 0.0556 (3) | |
H4A | 0.448 (5) | 0.3738 (17) | 0.3439 (8) | 0.067* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
N1 | 0.0464 (7) | 0.0473 (7) | 0.0338 (6) | −0.0050 (5) | 0.0072 (5) | −0.0078 (5) |
C1 | 0.0391 (7) | 0.0395 (7) | 0.0316 (7) | −0.0064 (5) | 0.0038 (5) | −0.0049 (5) |
N2 | 0.0690 (9) | 0.0481 (7) | 0.0339 (6) | 0.0058 (6) | 0.0017 (6) | −0.0040 (6) |
C3 | 0.0463 (8) | 0.0510 (9) | 0.0452 (8) | −0.0037 (7) | 0.0129 (6) | −0.0118 (7) |
C4 | 0.0450 (8) | 0.0447 (8) | 0.0820 (12) | 0.0006 (7) | 0.0131 (8) | −0.0058 (8) |
C5 | 0.0511 (9) | 0.0552 (9) | 0.0664 (11) | −0.0078 (7) | 0.0001 (8) | 0.0187 (8) |
C6 | 0.0516 (9) | 0.0648 (10) | 0.0387 (8) | −0.0144 (8) | 0.0025 (7) | 0.0090 (7) |
C7 | 0.0367 (6) | 0.0310 (6) | 0.0303 (6) | −0.0027 (5) | 0.0067 (5) | 0.0019 (5) |
C8 | 0.0349 (6) | 0.0316 (6) | 0.0284 (6) | −0.0069 (5) | 0.0091 (5) | −0.0015 (5) |
C9 | 0.0437 (7) | 0.0364 (7) | 0.0351 (7) | −0.0050 (6) | 0.0102 (6) | −0.0056 (5) |
O1 | 0.0832 (8) | 0.0600 (7) | 0.0336 (6) | 0.0173 (6) | 0.0113 (5) | −0.0114 (5) |
O2 | 0.0841 (8) | 0.0469 (6) | 0.0453 (6) | 0.0203 (6) | 0.0074 (5) | −0.0048 (5) |
C10 | 0.0358 (6) | 0.0336 (6) | 0.0259 (6) | −0.0087 (5) | 0.0069 (5) | 0.0005 (5) |
C11 | 0.0451 (7) | 0.0429 (7) | 0.0275 (6) | −0.0065 (6) | 0.0055 (5) | 0.0006 (5) |
O3 | 0.0777 (7) | 0.0550 (7) | 0.0336 (6) | 0.0151 (6) | −0.0053 (5) | 0.0017 (4) |
O4 | 0.0763 (8) | 0.0634 (7) | 0.0257 (5) | 0.0096 (6) | 0.0045 (5) | −0.0065 (5) |
N1—C1 | 1.3281 (17) | C6—H6 | 0.9300 |
N1—C6 | 1.3392 (19) | C7—C8 | 1.3707 (17) |
N1—H1A | 0.913 (16) | C7—C10i | 1.3809 (17) |
C1—N2 | 1.3154 (19) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
C1—C3 | 1.3964 (19) | C8—C10 | 1.4049 (18) |
N2—H2A | 0.831 (19) | C8—C9 | 1.5197 (17) |
N2—H2B | 0.880 (19) | C9—O2 | 1.2212 (16) |
C3—C4 | 1.357 (2) | C9—O1 | 1.2483 (16) |
C3—H3 | 0.9300 | C10—C7i | 1.3809 (17) |
C4—C5 | 1.377 (2) | C10—C11 | 1.5037 (17) |
C4—H4 | 0.9300 | C11—O3 | 1.2133 (17) |
C5—C6 | 1.329 (2) | C11—O4 | 1.2811 (16) |
C5—H5 | 0.9300 | O4—H4A | 1.06 (2) |
C1—N1—C6 | 122.39 (13) | C5—C6—H6 | 119.1 |
C1—N1—H1A | 121.0 (10) | N1—C6—H6 | 119.1 |
C6—N1—H1A | 116.6 (10) | C8—C7—C10i | 124.36 (12) |
N2—C1—N1 | 118.70 (13) | C8—C7—H7 | 117.8 |
N2—C1—C3 | 124.06 (13) | C10i—C7—H7 | 117.8 |
N1—C1—C3 | 117.24 (13) | C7—C8—C10 | 117.52 (11) |
C1—N2—H2A | 117.8 (12) | C7—C8—C9 | 113.54 (11) |
C1—N2—H2B | 120.4 (12) | C10—C8—C9 | 128.93 (11) |
H2A—N2—H2B | 121.5 (17) | O2—C9—O1 | 120.93 (12) |
C4—C3—C1 | 120.15 (14) | O2—C9—C8 | 119.73 (11) |
C4—C3—H3 | 119.9 | O1—C9—C8 | 119.33 (12) |
C1—C3—H3 | 119.9 | C7i—C10—C8 | 118.12 (11) |
C3—C4—C5 | 120.25 (15) | C7i—C10—C11 | 112.67 (11) |
C3—C4—H4 | 119.9 | C8—C10—C11 | 129.20 (11) |
C5—C4—H4 | 119.9 | O3—C11—O4 | 121.18 (12) |
C6—C5—C4 | 118.13 (15) | O3—C11—C10 | 119.99 (12) |
C6—C5—H5 | 120.9 | O4—C11—C10 | 118.83 (12) |
C4—C5—H5 | 120.9 | C11—O4—H4A | 112.5 (9) |
C5—C6—N1 | 121.83 (15) | ||
C6—N1—C1—N2 | −179.42 (13) | C10—C8—C9—O2 | −175.39 (13) |
C6—N1—C1—C3 | 0.14 (19) | C7—C8—C9—O1 | −173.10 (12) |
N2—C1—C3—C4 | 178.46 (14) | C10—C8—C9—O1 | 5.7 (2) |
N1—C1—C3—C4 | −1.1 (2) | C7—C8—C10—C7i | −0.56 (18) |
C1—C3—C4—C5 | 0.8 (2) | C9—C8—C10—C7i | −179.36 (11) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | 0.5 (2) | C7—C8—C10—C11 | −179.96 (11) |
C4—C5—C6—N1 | −1.4 (2) | C9—C8—C10—C11 | 1.2 (2) |
C1—N1—C6—C5 | 1.1 (2) | C7i—C10—C11—O3 | −1.71 (17) |
C10i—C7—C8—C10 | 0.60 (19) | C8—C10—C11—O3 | 177.72 (13) |
C10i—C7—C8—C9 | 179.58 (11) | C7i—C10—C11—O4 | 178.55 (12) |
C7—C8—C9—O2 | 5.76 (17) | C8—C10—C11—O4 | −2.01 (19) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1A···O2 | 0.913 (16) | 1.904 (17) | 2.7852 (15) | 161.6 (15) |
N1—H1A···O1 | 0.913 (16) | 2.478 (16) | 3.2413 (16) | 141.4 (13) |
N2—H2A···O3ii | 0.831 (19) | 2.125 (19) | 2.9520 (17) | 173.0 (17) |
N2—H2B···O1 | 0.880 (19) | 2.14 (2) | 2.9759 (17) | 157.6 (16) |
O4—H4A···O1 | 1.06 (2) | 1.31 (2) | 2.3766 (15) | 176.8 (17) |
Symmetry code: (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | 2C5H7N2+·C10H4O82− |
Mr | 442.38 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 273 |
a, b, c (Å) | 4.0165 (1), 10.8098 (4), 21.4036 (7) |
β (°) | 99.535 (2) |
V (Å3) | 916.45 (5) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.13 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.15 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.755, 1.000 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 18838, 2209, 1652 |
Rint | 0.024 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.666 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.037, 0.102, 1.01 |
No. of reflections | 2209 |
No. of parameters | 158 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.20, −0.15 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker–Nonius, 2004), SAINT (Bruker, 2003), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2009).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1A···O2 | 0.913 (16) | 1.904 (17) | 2.7852 (15) | 161.6 (15) |
N1—H1A···O1 | 0.913 (16) | 2.478 (16) | 3.2413 (16) | 141.4 (13) |
N2—H2A···O3i | 0.831 (19) | 2.125 (19) | 2.9520 (17) | 173.0 (17) |
N2—H2B···O1 | 0.880 (19) | 2.14 (2) | 2.9759 (17) | 157.6 (16) |
O4—H4A···O1 | 1.06 (2) | 1.31 (2) | 2.3766 (15) | 176.8 (17) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2. |
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funds from FEDER via the COMPETE (Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade) programme and by the FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) (project PEst-C/FIS/UI0036/2011).
References
Acheson, R. M. (1967). An Introduction to the Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, 2nd ed., pp. 215–218. London: Wiley. Google Scholar
Bis, J. A. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2005). Cryst. Growth Des. 5, 1169–1179. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bruker (2003). SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bruker–Nonius (2004). APEX2. Bruker–Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Büyükgüngör, O. & Odabas˛ogˇlu, M. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o691–o692. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chitra, R., Roussel, P., Capet, F., Murli, C. & Choudhury, R. R. (2008). J. Mol. Struct. 891, 103–109. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Dong, G.-Y., Liu, T.-F., He, C.-H., Deng, X.-C. & Shi, X.-G. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1696. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Guelmami, L. & Jouini, A. (2011). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 41, 1268–1272. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Odabasoglu, M., Büyükgüngör, O., Turgut, G., Karadag, A., Bulak, E. & Lönneçke, P. (2003). J. Mol. Struct. 648, 133–138. CAS Google Scholar
Quah, C. K., Jebas, S. R. & Fun, H.-K. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o2230. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wang, Y.-J. & Tang, L.-M. (2010). Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 29, 102–108. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
This work is a further contribution to the broad family of structural studies of 2-aminopyridinium (2-apyH) systems with hydrogen-bond donors. A considerable number of analogous materials formed from 2-aminopyridine and a given carboxylic acid has already been reported (Guelmami & Jouini, 2011; Chitra et al., 2008; Quah et al., 2008; Bis & Zaworotko, 2005; Büyükgüngör & Odabas˛ogˇlu, 2002; Odabas˛ogˇlu et al., 2003; etc). This is due to the fact that 2-aminopyridine is protonated in acidic solutions. It is well known that the bonding of the H atom to the ring N atom of 2-aminopyridine, and not to the amino N atom, produces an ion for which an additional resonance structure must be considered (Acheson, 1967). We have inferred the positive charge in the 2-apyH ion lies on the amino group based on a difference fourier map, a common practice when allowed by the quality of the collected intensities. The charge state, related to the hydrogen loss, in each of the two candidate carboxylic acid groups belonging to the assymetric unit was also inferred from a difference map and further reinforced by analysis of the C–O bond lengths.
Ellucidation of the numbering scheme and a view of the H-bonds giving rise to two-dimensional networks parallel to (100) are shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. Both the 2-apyH cation and 2,5-dicarboxybenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate (btcH2) anion are nearly planar, with r.m.s. deviations of 0.015 and 0.050 A, respectively. The angle between the latter idealized planes is 17.68 (9)°. The two-dimensional networks are formed by alternating 2-apyH and btcH2 linked by H-bonds and include all H-bonds found. The first order network describing the H-bonding in the title compound is N1=4DS(7), as established by applying the rules of graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals (Etter et al., 1990).
Similar and most common conformations of 2,5-dicarboxybenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate were described by Dong et al. (2011) and Wang & Tang (2010).