organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

2,3-Di­hydro­pyrrolo­[2,1-b]quinazoline-9(1H)-thione

aS. Yunusov Institute of the Chemistry of Plant Substances, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan, Mirzo Ulugbek Str. 77, Tashkent 100170, Uzbekistan
*Correspondence e-mail: azizbek-no@mail.ru

(Received 8 May 2012; accepted 10 May 2012; online 16 May 2012)

In the crystal, mol­ecules of the title compound, C11H10N2S, are connected by C—H⋯N inter­actions around threefold axes. Furthermore, they form stacks along the c axis showing ππ inter­actions between pyrimidine rings [centroid–centroid distance = 3.721 (1) Å]. The central ring is essentially planar with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.007 Å. The five-membered ring adopts an envelope conformation with the flap atom deviating by 0.241 (4) Å from the mean plane (r.m.s. deviation = 0.002 Å) through the other four ring atoms.

Related literature

For the synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-1H,9H-pyrrolo­[2,1-b]quinazolin-9-one and the title compound, see: Abduraza­kov et al. (2007[Abdurazakov, A. Sh., Elmuradov, B. Zh., Nasrullaev, A. O., Makhmudov, S. A. & Shakhidoyatov, Kh. M. (2007). Highlights in the Evolution of Phytochemistry, Abstract book, p. 122. Cambridge: RPS Publishing.]); Shakhidoyatov & Kadyrov (1977[Shakhidoyatov, Kh. M. & Kadyrov, Ch. Sh. (1977). Khim. Prir. Soedin. pp. 668-670.]); Elmuradov et al. (2010[Elmuradov, B. Z., Turgunov, K., Tashkhodjaev, B. & Shakhidoyatov, K. M. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1238.]). For related structures, see Elmuradov et al. (2010[Elmuradov, B. Z., Turgunov, K., Tashkhodjaev, B. & Shakhidoyatov, K. M. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1238.]); Turgunov et al. (1995[Turgunov, K. K., Tashkhodjaev, B., Molchanov, L. V. & Aripov, Kh. N. (1995). Khim. Prir. Soedin. pp. 849-854.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C11H10N2S

  • Mr = 202.27

  • Trigonal, R 3c

  • a = 26.206 (1) Å

  • c = 7.441 (2) Å

  • V = 4425.5 (12) Å3

  • Z = 18

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.57 mm−1

  • T = 295 K

  • 0.65 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection
  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.]) Tmin = 0.601, Tmax = 1.000

  • 5753 measured reflections

  • 1379 independent reflections

  • 1305 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.021

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029

  • wR(F2) = 0.078

  • S = 1.06

  • 1379 reflections

  • 128 parameters

  • 1 restraint

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881.]), 501 Friedel pairs

  • Flack parameter: −0.003 (19)

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C7—H7A⋯N1i 0.93 2.61 3.464 (4) 153
Symmetry code: (i) -y+1, x-y, z.

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: XP (Bruker, 1998[Bruker (1998). XP. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

The title compound was synthesized by the reaction of 2,3-dihydro-1H,9H-pyrrolo[2,1-b]quinazolin-9-one with phosphorus pentasulfide (Figure 1). X-ray single-crystal diffraction study reveals that the title compound crystallizes in the space group R3c with one molecule in the asymmetric unit. The molecule is almost planar (excluding the atom C10) with r.m.s. deviation of 0.014 Å. The central (pyrimidinic) ring is planar with rms deviations of 0.007Å. Conformation of five-membered (pyrrolic) ring is envelope with deviation of the atom C10 (0.241 (4) Å) from mean plane of other four atoms (rms deviations of 0.002 Å) of the ring. In the structure weak C—H···N interactions (Table 1) are observed. The molecules are stacked along the c axis by ππ stacking interactions between pyrimidine rings [centroid-centroid distances = 3.721 (1) Å].

Related literature top

For the synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-1H,9H-pyrrolo[2,1-b]quinazolin-9-one and the title compound, see: Abdurazakov et al. (2007); Shakhidoyatov & Kadyrov (1977); Elmuradov et al. (2010). For related structures, see Elmuradov et al. (2010); Turgunov et al. (1995).

Experimental top

2.5 g (13 mmole) of 2,3-dihydro-1H,9H-pyrrolo[2,1]quinazolin-9-one was dissolved in 15 ml m-xylene and 2.98 g (13 mmole) of phosphorus pentasulfide were added (Figure 1). Reaction mixture was boiled 2 h and allowed to cool up to room temperature. The precipitate was filtered, flushed with m-xylene (3 ml) and 10% NaOH (50 ml) was added, then the precipittate was filtered and washed with water to get neutral medium and was dried. After recrystallization from hexane 1.96 g (72%) the title compound crystals. Suitable for X-ray diffraction crystals was obtained from hexane with m.p. 138 °C

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.67 (1H, dd, J=8.3, J=1.7, H-8), 7.69 (1H, td, J=8.3, J=1.7, H-6), 7.59 (1H, dd, J=8.3, J=1.2, H-5), 7.43 (1H, td, J=8.3, J=1.2, H-6), 4.47 (2H, t, J=7.5, 1-CH2), 3.25 (2H, t, J=7.9, 3-CH2), 2.28 (2H, m, 2-CH2)

Refinement top

H atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as riding on their C atoms, with C—H distances of 0.93 Å (aromatic)and 0.97 Å (CH2) and were refined with Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XP (Bruker, 1998); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Reaction scheme
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The molecular structure of the title compound with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
2,3-Dihydropyrrolo[2,1-b]quinazoline-9(1H)-thione top
Crystal data top
C11H10N2SDx = 1.366 Mg m3
Mr = 202.27Melting point: 411 K
Trigonal, R3cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
Hall symbol: R 3 -2"cCell parameters from 2338 reflections
a = 26.206 (1) Åθ = 3.4–66.8°
c = 7.441 (2) ŵ = 2.57 mm1
V = 4425.5 (12) Å3T = 295 K
Z = 18Prism, yellow
F(000) = 19080.65 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby
diffractometer
1379 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Cu) X-ray Source1305 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
Detector resolution: 10.2576 pixels mm-1θmax = 66.8°, θmin = 3.4°
ω scansh = 2831
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
k = 3131
Tmin = 0.601, Tmax = 1.000l = 88
5753 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0613P)2 + 0.028P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.078(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.16 e Å3
1379 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
128 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraintExtinction coefficient: 0.00144 (11)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 501 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 0.003 (19)
Crystal data top
C11H10N2SZ = 18
Mr = 202.27Cu Kα radiation
Trigonal, R3cµ = 2.57 mm1
a = 26.206 (1) ÅT = 295 K
c = 7.441 (2) Å0.65 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
V = 4425.5 (12) Å3
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby
diffractometer
1379 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
1305 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.601, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.021
5753 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.078Δρmax = 0.16 e Å3
S = 1.06Δρmin = 0.19 e Å3
1379 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 501 Friedel pairs
128 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.003 (19)
1 restraint
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.89225 (2)0.23959 (3)0.13284 (10)0.0588 (2)
N10.71400 (8)0.21624 (8)0.2807 (3)0.0562 (5)
C20.72288 (9)0.17396 (9)0.2343 (3)0.0480 (4)
N30.77699 (7)0.18140 (7)0.1857 (2)0.0445 (4)
C40.82758 (8)0.23443 (9)0.1852 (3)0.0451 (4)
C4A0.81976 (9)0.28375 (9)0.2345 (3)0.0477 (4)
C50.86723 (10)0.34181 (10)0.2392 (4)0.0614 (5)
H5A0.90500.34950.21050.074*
C60.85814 (13)0.38726 (11)0.2857 (5)0.0765 (8)
H6A0.88980.42560.28800.092*
C70.80209 (14)0.37644 (12)0.3296 (5)0.0827 (9)
H7A0.79640.40760.36040.099*
C80.75527 (11)0.32025 (12)0.3276 (5)0.0746 (7)
H8A0.71800.31350.35810.090*
C8A0.76270 (10)0.27240 (9)0.2803 (3)0.0528 (5)
C90.67738 (10)0.11011 (10)0.2275 (4)0.0601 (5)
H9A0.64360.10400.15700.072*
H9B0.66420.09470.34750.072*
C100.70825 (10)0.08040 (10)0.1391 (4)0.0670 (6)
H10A0.69990.04500.20440.080*
H10B0.69490.06970.01610.080*
C110.77385 (10)0.12481 (9)0.1437 (4)0.0548 (5)
H11A0.79340.11460.23560.066*
H11B0.79200.12670.02830.066*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0415 (3)0.0673 (4)0.0720 (3)0.0306 (2)0.0040 (2)0.0012 (3)
N10.0407 (8)0.0548 (10)0.0767 (12)0.0265 (8)0.0002 (8)0.0031 (9)
C20.0375 (9)0.0509 (10)0.0541 (10)0.0210 (8)0.0041 (8)0.0011 (9)
N30.0422 (8)0.0457 (9)0.0480 (8)0.0238 (7)0.0023 (6)0.0014 (7)
C40.0420 (9)0.0512 (11)0.0442 (9)0.0250 (9)0.0033 (8)0.0018 (8)
C4A0.0444 (10)0.0472 (10)0.0541 (10)0.0249 (8)0.0033 (8)0.0033 (9)
C50.0499 (11)0.0504 (11)0.0791 (14)0.0215 (9)0.0041 (11)0.0013 (11)
C60.0686 (15)0.0437 (12)0.110 (2)0.0229 (12)0.0094 (14)0.0012 (13)
C70.0838 (17)0.0545 (13)0.124 (3)0.0454 (13)0.0099 (18)0.0084 (15)
C80.0615 (14)0.0649 (14)0.112 (2)0.0429 (12)0.0006 (15)0.0018 (15)
C8A0.0485 (11)0.0482 (11)0.0667 (12)0.0279 (9)0.0062 (10)0.0009 (9)
C90.0429 (10)0.0519 (11)0.0752 (13)0.0160 (9)0.0014 (10)0.0002 (11)
C100.0616 (14)0.0464 (11)0.0850 (16)0.0211 (10)0.0043 (13)0.0053 (11)
C110.0601 (12)0.0512 (11)0.0592 (11)0.0325 (10)0.0004 (11)0.0029 (12)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—C41.6771 (18)C6—H6A0.9300
N1—C21.288 (3)C7—C81.366 (4)
N1—C8A1.384 (3)C7—H7A0.9300
C2—N31.380 (3)C8—C8A1.406 (3)
C2—C91.493 (3)C8—H8A0.9300
N3—C41.359 (3)C9—C101.524 (3)
N3—C111.477 (3)C9—H9A0.9700
C4—C4A1.453 (3)C9—H9B0.9700
C4A—C51.404 (3)C10—C111.520 (3)
C4A—C8A1.413 (3)C10—H10A0.9700
C5—C61.371 (4)C10—H10B0.9700
C5—H5A0.9300C11—H11A0.9700
C6—C71.388 (4)C11—H11B0.9700
C2—N1—C8A116.55 (17)C7—C8—H8A119.6
N1—C2—N3124.32 (18)C8A—C8—H8A119.6
N1—C2—C9125.92 (19)N1—C8A—C8118.8 (2)
N3—C2—C9109.75 (18)N1—C8A—C4A122.71 (18)
C4—N3—C2123.61 (16)C8—C8A—C4A118.5 (2)
C4—N3—C11124.21 (16)C2—C9—C10104.87 (19)
C2—N3—C11112.11 (16)C2—C9—H9A110.8
N3—C4—C4A114.17 (16)C10—C9—H9A110.8
N3—C4—S1120.86 (15)C2—C9—H9B110.8
C4A—C4—S1124.97 (16)C10—C9—H9B110.8
C5—C4A—C8A119.56 (19)H9A—C9—H9B108.8
C5—C4A—C4121.83 (19)C11—C10—C9106.58 (18)
C8A—C4A—C4118.61 (18)C11—C10—H10A110.4
C6—C5—C4A120.2 (2)C9—C10—H10A110.4
C6—C5—H5A119.9C11—C10—H10B110.4
C4A—C5—H5A119.9C9—C10—H10B110.4
C5—C6—C7120.5 (2)H10A—C10—H10B108.6
C5—C6—H6A119.7N3—C11—C10104.32 (18)
C7—C6—H6A119.7N3—C11—H11A110.9
C8—C7—C6120.4 (2)C10—C11—H11A110.9
C8—C7—H7A119.8N3—C11—H11B110.9
C6—C7—H7A119.8C10—C11—H11B110.9
C7—C8—C8A120.9 (2)H11A—C11—H11B108.9
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7A···N1i0.932.613.464 (4)153
Symmetry code: (i) y+1, xy, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC11H10N2S
Mr202.27
Crystal system, space groupTrigonal, R3c
Temperature (K)295
a, c (Å)26.206 (1), 7.441 (2)
V3)4425.5 (12)
Z18
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)2.57
Crystal size (mm)0.65 × 0.25 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
Tmin, Tmax0.601, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5753, 1379, 1305
Rint0.021
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.596
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.078, 1.06
No. of reflections1379
No. of parameters128
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.16, 0.19
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 501 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.003 (19)

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), XP (Bruker, 1998), publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7A···N1i0.932.6103.464 (4)153.00
Symmetry code: (i) y+1, xy, z.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan for supporting this study (grant Nos. FA-F7-T185 and FA-F7-T207).

References

First citationAbdurazakov, A. Sh., Elmuradov, B. Zh., Nasrullaev, A. O., Makhmudov, S. A. & Shakhidoyatov, Kh. M. (2007). Highlights in the Evolution of Phytochemistry, Abstract book, p. 122. Cambridge: RPS Publishing.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (1998). XP. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationElmuradov, B. Z., Turgunov, K., Tashkhodjaev, B. & Shakhidoyatov, K. M. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1238.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFlack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationOxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.  Google Scholar
First citationShakhidoyatov, Kh. M. & Kadyrov, Ch. Sh. (1977). Khim. Prir. Soedin. pp. 668–670.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationTurgunov, K. K., Tashkhodjaev, B., Molchanov, L. V. & Aripov, Kh. N. (1995). Khim. Prir. Soedin. pp. 849–854.  Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds