organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

1,4-Di­methyl­piperazine-1,4-diium dibromide dihydrate

aCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: sunsuwen_5127@163.com

(Received 25 April 2012; accepted 5 May 2012; online 12 May 2012)

In the title hydrated mol­ecular salt, C6H16N22+·2Br·2H2O, the complete 1,4-dimethyl­piperazine-1,4-diium dication is generated by crystallographic inversion symmetry and both exocyclic C—N bonds are in equatorial orientations. In the crystal, the components are linked by N—H⋯O and O—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, generating chains propagating in [110].

Related literature

For background to mol­ecular ferroelectrics, see: Fu et al. (2009[Fu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994-997.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C6H16N22+·2Br·2H2O

  • Mr = 312.06

  • Triclinic, [P \overline 1]

  • a = 6.2975 (13) Å

  • b = 7.0180 (14) Å

  • c = 7.2143 (14) Å

  • α = 71.54 (3)°

  • β = 86.62 (3)°

  • γ = 85.54 (3)°

  • V = 301.32 (10) Å3

  • Z = 1

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 6.70 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.30 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection
  • Rigaku SCXmini CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005[Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan .]) Tmin = 0.154, Tmax = 0.262

  • 3084 measured reflections

  • 1370 independent reflections

  • 1131 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.067

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059

  • wR(F2) = 0.169

  • S = 1.02

  • 1370 reflections

  • 64 parameters

  • 3 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.80 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −1.12 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i 0.91 1.83 2.737 (9) 174
O1—H1WA⋯Br1ii 0.85 (6) 2.51 (9) 3.275 (7) 151 (11)
O1—H1WB⋯Br1 0.85 (3) 2.41 (4) 3.244 (7) 166 (7)
Symmetry codes: (i) x-1, y, z; (ii) -x+1, -y, -z+1.

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005[Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan .]); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

Dielectric constant measurements of compounds as a function of temperature is the basic methods to find the materials which possess potential ferroelectric phase changes (Fu et al., 2009). The dielectric constant of the title compound has been measured,but showed no dielectric disuniformity in the range 113–353 K(mp.403–410 K).

The asymmetric unit of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. crystallized in the monoclinic P-1 space group, The crystal packing Fig. 2 features weak intermolecular O—H···Br and N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1).

Related literature top

For background to molecular ferroelectrics, see: Fu et al. (2009).

Experimental top

1,4-Dimethyl-piperazine (0.57 g) and an excess of hydrobromic acid (0.95 g) were dissolved in methanol without any precipitation under stirring at room temperature. Colourless blocks of the title compound were obtained by slow evaporation of a methanol solution at room temperature over two days.

Refinement top

H atoms were placed in calculated positions (N—H = 0.89 Å; C—H = 0.96 Å and 0.97 Å for Csp3 atoms), assigned fixed Uiso values [1.5Ueq(Csp3,N)] and allowed to ride.The H1WA and H1WB on the O1 were restrained with O—H =0.85 Å yielding O1—H1 = 0.8448 Å and O1 —H2 = 0.8440 Å, with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Uiso(O).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with 30% probability displacement ellipsoids.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A view of the packing of the title compound, stacking along the b axis. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds.
1,4-Dimethylpiperazine-1,4-diium dibromide dihydrate top
Crystal data top
C6H16N22+·2Br·2H2OV = 301.32 (10) Å3
Mr = 312.06Z = 1
Triclinic, P1F(000) = 156
Hall symbol: -P 1Dx = 1.720 Mg m3
a = 6.2975 (13) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 7.0180 (14) Åθ = 3.1–27.5°
c = 7.2143 (14) ŵ = 6.70 mm1
α = 71.54 (3)°T = 293 K
β = 86.62 (3)°Block, colorless
γ = 85.54 (3)°0.30 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku SCXmini CCD
diffractometer
1370 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1131 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.067
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
CCD_Profile_fitting scansh = 87
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
k = 99
Tmin = 0.154, Tmax = 0.262l = 99
3084 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.169H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0897P)2 + 0.3362P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1370 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.024
64 parametersΔρmax = 0.80 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = 1.12 e Å3
Crystal data top
C6H16N22+·2Br·2H2Oγ = 85.54 (3)°
Mr = 312.06V = 301.32 (10) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 1
a = 6.2975 (13) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 7.0180 (14) ŵ = 6.70 mm1
c = 7.2143 (14) ÅT = 293 K
α = 71.54 (3)°0.30 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
β = 86.62 (3)°
Data collection top
Rigaku SCXmini CCD
diffractometer
1370 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
1131 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.154, Tmax = 0.262Rint = 0.067
3084 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0593 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.169H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.80 e Å3
1370 reflectionsΔρmin = 1.12 e Å3
64 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.0403 (8)0.3473 (7)0.6882 (7)0.0319 (11)
H1A0.03620.24770.67540.038*
C20.1103 (10)0.5311 (10)0.6709 (9)0.0355 (13)
H2A0.22250.49730.77170.043*
H2B0.03310.63710.69040.043*
C30.2067 (9)0.3955 (10)0.5259 (9)0.0346 (13)
H3A0.29910.27590.53500.042*
H3B0.29340.49790.54060.042*
C10.1381 (11)0.2748 (10)0.8819 (10)0.0428 (15)
H1B0.25640.18080.87880.064*
H1C0.03420.20980.97960.064*
H1D0.18720.38690.91290.064*
Br10.61718 (10)0.21220 (10)0.19573 (10)0.0445 (3)
O10.7864 (11)0.0695 (11)0.6378 (10)0.0737 (19)
H1WA0.675 (9)0.027 (18)0.707 (10)0.11 (5)*
H1WB0.757 (12)0.090 (12)0.519 (4)0.05 (2)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.035 (3)0.031 (2)0.028 (3)0.003 (2)0.002 (2)0.007 (2)
C20.037 (3)0.043 (3)0.027 (3)0.001 (3)0.002 (2)0.012 (3)
C30.031 (3)0.041 (3)0.031 (3)0.003 (2)0.001 (2)0.013 (3)
C10.056 (4)0.043 (4)0.028 (3)0.000 (3)0.010 (3)0.008 (3)
Br10.0393 (4)0.0481 (5)0.0451 (5)0.0090 (3)0.0021 (3)0.0116 (3)
O10.080 (4)0.084 (4)0.055 (4)0.048 (4)0.012 (3)0.007 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C11.482 (8)C3—H3A0.9700
N1—C31.498 (8)C3—H3B0.9700
N1—C21.516 (8)C1—H1B0.9600
N1—H1A0.9100C1—H1C0.9600
C2—C3i1.497 (9)C1—H1D0.9600
C2—H2A0.9700O1—H1WA0.853 (10)
C2—H2B0.9700O1—H1WB0.854 (10)
C3—C2i1.497 (9)
C1—N1—C3111.3 (5)N1—C3—H3A109.2
C1—N1—C2111.1 (5)C2i—C3—H3A109.2
C3—N1—C2109.7 (5)N1—C3—H3B109.2
C1—N1—H1A108.2C2i—C3—H3B109.2
C3—N1—H1A108.2H3A—C3—H3B107.9
C2—N1—H1A108.2N1—C1—H1B109.5
C3i—C2—N1110.7 (5)N1—C1—H1C109.5
C3i—C2—H2A109.5H1B—C1—H1C109.5
N1—C2—H2A109.5N1—C1—H1D109.5
C3i—C2—H2B109.5H1B—C1—H1D109.5
N1—C2—H2B109.5H1C—C1—H1D109.5
H2A—C2—H2B108.1H1WA—O1—H1WB107 (3)
N1—C3—C2i111.9 (5)
C1—N1—C2—C3i179.4 (5)C1—N1—C3—C2i180.0 (5)
C3—N1—C2—C3i56.0 (7)C2—N1—C3—C2i56.7 (7)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1ii0.911.832.737 (9)174
O1—H1WA···Br1iii0.85 (6)2.51 (9)3.275 (7)151 (11)
O1—H1WB···Br10.85 (3)2.41 (4)3.244 (7)166 (7)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x1, y, z; (iii) x+1, y, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H16N22+·2Br·2H2O
Mr312.06
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)6.2975 (13), 7.0180 (14), 7.2143 (14)
α, β, γ (°)71.54 (3), 86.62 (3), 85.54 (3)
V3)301.32 (10)
Z1
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)6.70
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.30 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku SCXmini CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
Tmin, Tmax0.154, 0.262
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3084, 1370, 1131
Rint0.067
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.059, 0.169, 1.02
No. of reflections1370
No. of parameters64
No. of restraints3
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.80, 1.12

Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.911.832.737 (9)174
O1—H1WA···Br1ii0.85 (6)2.51 (9)3.275 (7)151 (11)
O1—H1WB···Br10.85 (3)2.41 (4)3.244 (7)166 (7)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x+1, y, z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the starter fund of Southeast University for financial support to buy the X-ray diffractometer.

References

First citationFu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994–997.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan .  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds