inorganic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Na3Co2(AsO4)(As2O7): a new sodium cobalt arsenate

aLaboratoire de Matériaux et Cristallochimie, Faculté des Sciences, El Manar II, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia, and bInstitut Préparatoire aux Etudes d'Ingénieurs d'El Manar, BP 244 El Manar II, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia
*Correspondence e-mail: abderrahmen.guesmi@ipeim.rnu.tn

(Received 28 May 2012; accepted 19 June 2012; online 27 June 2012)

In the title compound, tris­odium dicobalt arsenate diarsenate, Na3Co2AsO4As2O7, the two Co atoms, one of the two As and three of the seven O atoms lie on special positions, with site symmetries 2 and m for the Co, m for the As, and 2 and twice m for the O atoms. The two Na atoms are disordered over two general and special positions [occupancies 0.72 (3):0.28 (3) and 0.940 (6):0.060 (6), respectively]. The main structural feature is the association of the CoO6 octa­hedra in the ab plane, forming Co4O20 units, which are corner- and edge-connected via AsO4 and As2O7 arsenate groups, giving rise to a complex polyhedral connectivity with small tunnels, such as those running along the b- and c-axis directions, in which the Na+ ions reside. The structural model is validated by both bond-valence-sum and charge-distribution methods, and the distortion of the coordination polyhedra is analyzed by means of the effective coordination number.

Related literature

For related structures, see: Ruiz-Valero et al. (1996[Ruiz-Valero, C., Gutierrez-Puebla, E., Monge, A., Amador, U., Parada, C. & Sanz, F. (1996). J. Solid State Chem. 123, 129-139.]); Ben Smail & Jouini (2005[Ben Smail, R. & Jouini, T. (2005). Anal. Chem. 30, 119-132.]); Guesmi & Driss (2002a[Guesmi, A. & Driss, A. (2002a). Acta Cryst. C58, i16-i17.],b[Guesmi, A. & Driss, A. (2002b). J. Soc. Chem. Tunis. 4, 1675-1683.]). For bond-valence analysis, see: Brown (2002[Brown, I. D. (2002). The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry - The Bond Valence Model. IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, 12. Oxford University Press.]); Adams (2003[Adams, S. (2003). softBV. University of Göttingen, Germany. http://kristall.uni-mki.gwdg.de/softBV/.]). For the charge distribution method, see: Nespolo et al. (2001[Nespolo, M., Ferraris, G., Ivaldi, G. & Hoppe, R. (2001). Acta Cryst. B57, 652-664.]); Nespolo (2001[Nespolo, M. (2001). CHARDT-IT, CRM2. University Henri Poincaré Nancy I, France.]); Guesmi et al. (2006[Guesmi, A., Nespolo, M. & Driss, A. (2006). J. Solid State Chem. 179, 2466-2471.]).

Experimental

Crystal data
  • Na3Co2(AsO4)(As2O7)

  • Mr = 587.59

  • Monoclinic, C 2/m

  • a = 10.484 (3) Å

  • b = 16.309 (2) Å

  • c = 6.531 (1) Å

  • β = 120.40 (2)°

  • V = 963.2 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 13.87 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm

Data collection
  • Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968[North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351-359.]) Tmin = 0.168, Tmax = 0.338

  • 1765 measured reflections

  • 1183 independent reflections

  • 998 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.041

  • 2 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: 1%

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027

  • wR(F2) = 0.067

  • S = 1.01

  • 1183 reflections

  • 103 parameters

  • Δρmax = 0.72 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.80 e Å−3

Table 1
Bond-valence-sum and charge distribution analysis

Cation q(isof(i) V(i) Q(i) CN(i) ECoN(i) dmoy(i) dmed(i)
Co1 2.00 1.87 2.01 6 5.97 2.14 2.14
Co2 2.00 2.05 2.03 6 5.62 2.11 2.08
As1 5.00 4.99 5.13 4 3.99 1.69 1.69
As2 5.00 4.93 4.94 4 3.89 1.70 1.69
Na1A 0.72 0.65 0.72 8 7.33 2.67 2.63
Na1B 0.28 0.25 0.27 8 5.72 2.74 2.58
Na2A 0.94 1.02 0.92 7 5.52 2.58 2.45
Na2B 0.06 0.07 0.06 6 4.78 2.45 2.31
q(i) = formal oxidation number; sof(i) = site occupation factor; dmoy(i) = arithmetic average distance (Å); dmed(i) = weighted average distance (Å); sodium CNS for d(Na—O)max = 3.10 Å; σcat = dispersion factor on cationic charges measuring the deviation of the computed charges (Q) with respect to the formal oxidation numbers; σcat = [Σi(qiQi)2/N−1]1/2 = 0.055.

Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1995[Enraf-Nonius (1995). CAD-4 EXPRESS. Enraf-Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995[Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4. University of Marburg, Germany.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2001[Brandenburg, K. (2001). DIAMOND. University of Bonn, Germany.]); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999[Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837-838.]) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010)[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.].

Supporting information


Comment top

The rich chemistry of the A–Co–P/As–O crystallographic systems (A is a monovalent cation), has been shown by the synthesis and crystal structures of several compounds with particular crystallographic properties such as: Na4Co3(PO4)2P2O7, a phosphate containing a three-dimensional system of large intersecting tunnels (Ruiz-Valero et al. 1996), AgCo3H2(PO4)3, an alluaudite-like phosphate structure (Guesmi & Driss, 2002a), K2CoP2O7, a layered tetrahedral phosphate with the mellilite structure (Guesmi & Driss, 2002b), etc.

For the case of arsenates, their main structural difference if compared to phosphates is that arsenic atoms can also adopt an octahedral coordination; it is the case for example of the oxygen-deficient layered sodium arsenate Na7As11O31 (Guesmi et al. 2006). Continuous investigations on the crystal chemistry of the arsenates are performed because arsenic is at the top of the priority of the most hazardous substances, but less is known about its crystal structures.

We are interested in the present work in the crystal structure of the new compound Na3Co2AsO4As2O7 (I). The crystal structure of the isostructural Na3Ni2(As0.1P0.9)O4(As1.3P0.7)O7 compound and ionic conductivity properties of its limiting arsenate has been studied (Ben Smail & Jouini, 2005). The chemical formula of (I) has been established as a result of the crystal structure determination and the obtained structural model is validated by means of charge distribution (CD) (Nespolo et al. 2001, Nespolo, 2001) and bond valence sum methods (BVS) (Brown, 2002; Adams, 2003) as the formal charges (Q) and valences (V) agree well with the expected values (Table 1).

The new compound (I) is an example of a mixed transition-metal arsenate, representing the first cobalt arsenate built up from mono- and diarsenate groups. In the asymetric unit, the crystal structure is built up from corner and edge-sharing between cobalt octahedra and arsenate groups (Fig. 1). The two crystallographically distinct cobalt atoms exhibit a slightly distorted octahedral coordination with effective coordination numbers ECoN(Co1)=5.97 and ECoN(Co2)=5.62 and weighted average distances dmed(Co1)=2.14 Å and dmed(Co2)=2.08 Å. The longest Co–O6 bond distances in the two octahedra correspond to the three-coordinated oxygen atom, related also to As1.

The As1 tetrahedron, with a 2 + 2 coordination, shares its four corners with five octahedra. The As2 tetrahedron, a more precisely a trigonal pyramid (1 + 3 coordination), is more distorted with O5 as a bridging oxygen in the As(2)2O7 group (ECoN(As2)=3.89 and dmed(As2)=1.69 Å). The other six corners in the diarsenate group are common with four Co1 and two Co2 octahedra. It is worth noting that the Co2 and As1 polyhedra share a common edge which induces a strong repulsion between positive charges; this type of connection was also observed in the structure of Na4Co3(PO4)2P2O7 (Ruiz-Valero et al. 1996).

The cobalt octahedra are associated in the ab plane to form the original octahedral metallic units Co4O20 which are corner- and edge-connected via As(1)O4 and As(2)2O7 arsenate groups, giving rise to a complex polyhedral connectivity which produces small tunnels, such as those running along the b and c axis, where the sodium cations reside (Figs. 2–4).

The anionic framework can be decomposed in a succession of alternate layers in the ac plane, stacked along the crystallographic b-axis. They are built up of Co1 octahedra and As(2)2O7 groups in such a way that each octahedron is corner-shared to four diarsenate groups (Fig. 3). These layers are alternate by a chain type resulting from the connection between Co2 and As1 polyhedra and formed by the centrosymmetric cyclic units [Co2As2O14] (Fig. 4), each one of these units is connected to two neighbours by means of mixed Co–O–As bridges.

The Na1 ions are split into two independent positions near c/2, Na1B has the more distorted polyhedron and the ECoN(Na1B) is as low as 5.72. The Na2 ions are also disordered with the Na2B polyhedron sandwiched by Na2A ones which are off-centred around the Na2B positions. The motion of sodium cations within the framewok of (I) by means of theoretical studies and electrical measuremeents will be the subject of future works.

Related literature top

For related structures, see: Ruiz-Valero et al. (1996); Ben Smail & Jouini (2005); Guesmi & Driss (2002a,b). For bond-valence analysis, see Brown (2002); Adams (2003). For the charge distribution method, see Nespolo et al. (2001); Nespolo (2001); Guesmi et al. (2006).

Experimental top

The investigated compound was synthesized by a solid state reaction from a mixture of Na2CO3 (0.46 g, Fluka, 99.0%), cobalt (II and III) oxides (0.1 g, Fluka, 99.0%, Co 71% min.) and As2O5 (0.33 g, Prolabo). The reaction mixture was heated at 673 K for 24 h and progressively at 923 K and kept at this temperature for three days. Finally, it was slowly cooled to room temperature. The obtained pink crystals were separated from the excess flux by washing the product in boiling water.

Refinement top

The non-equivalent sodium ions are inserted in the anionic framework first in two full-occupied general and special crystallographic sites. The Na1 atoms are better described by a split model with two independent general positions, refined with the same thermal paramaters. The highest Fourier peaks near the Na2A site suggests that the Na2A position deviates from the full occupancy and another partial-occupied position (Na2B) was introduced in the model, leading to a lowering of R values and residual electron density peaks.

Structure description top

The rich chemistry of the A–Co–P/As–O crystallographic systems (A is a monovalent cation), has been shown by the synthesis and crystal structures of several compounds with particular crystallographic properties such as: Na4Co3(PO4)2P2O7, a phosphate containing a three-dimensional system of large intersecting tunnels (Ruiz-Valero et al. 1996), AgCo3H2(PO4)3, an alluaudite-like phosphate structure (Guesmi & Driss, 2002a), K2CoP2O7, a layered tetrahedral phosphate with the mellilite structure (Guesmi & Driss, 2002b), etc.

For the case of arsenates, their main structural difference if compared to phosphates is that arsenic atoms can also adopt an octahedral coordination; it is the case for example of the oxygen-deficient layered sodium arsenate Na7As11O31 (Guesmi et al. 2006). Continuous investigations on the crystal chemistry of the arsenates are performed because arsenic is at the top of the priority of the most hazardous substances, but less is known about its crystal structures.

We are interested in the present work in the crystal structure of the new compound Na3Co2AsO4As2O7 (I). The crystal structure of the isostructural Na3Ni2(As0.1P0.9)O4(As1.3P0.7)O7 compound and ionic conductivity properties of its limiting arsenate has been studied (Ben Smail & Jouini, 2005). The chemical formula of (I) has been established as a result of the crystal structure determination and the obtained structural model is validated by means of charge distribution (CD) (Nespolo et al. 2001, Nespolo, 2001) and bond valence sum methods (BVS) (Brown, 2002; Adams, 2003) as the formal charges (Q) and valences (V) agree well with the expected values (Table 1).

The new compound (I) is an example of a mixed transition-metal arsenate, representing the first cobalt arsenate built up from mono- and diarsenate groups. In the asymetric unit, the crystal structure is built up from corner and edge-sharing between cobalt octahedra and arsenate groups (Fig. 1). The two crystallographically distinct cobalt atoms exhibit a slightly distorted octahedral coordination with effective coordination numbers ECoN(Co1)=5.97 and ECoN(Co2)=5.62 and weighted average distances dmed(Co1)=2.14 Å and dmed(Co2)=2.08 Å. The longest Co–O6 bond distances in the two octahedra correspond to the three-coordinated oxygen atom, related also to As1.

The As1 tetrahedron, with a 2 + 2 coordination, shares its four corners with five octahedra. The As2 tetrahedron, a more precisely a trigonal pyramid (1 + 3 coordination), is more distorted with O5 as a bridging oxygen in the As(2)2O7 group (ECoN(As2)=3.89 and dmed(As2)=1.69 Å). The other six corners in the diarsenate group are common with four Co1 and two Co2 octahedra. It is worth noting that the Co2 and As1 polyhedra share a common edge which induces a strong repulsion between positive charges; this type of connection was also observed in the structure of Na4Co3(PO4)2P2O7 (Ruiz-Valero et al. 1996).

The cobalt octahedra are associated in the ab plane to form the original octahedral metallic units Co4O20 which are corner- and edge-connected via As(1)O4 and As(2)2O7 arsenate groups, giving rise to a complex polyhedral connectivity which produces small tunnels, such as those running along the b and c axis, where the sodium cations reside (Figs. 2–4).

The anionic framework can be decomposed in a succession of alternate layers in the ac plane, stacked along the crystallographic b-axis. They are built up of Co1 octahedra and As(2)2O7 groups in such a way that each octahedron is corner-shared to four diarsenate groups (Fig. 3). These layers are alternate by a chain type resulting from the connection between Co2 and As1 polyhedra and formed by the centrosymmetric cyclic units [Co2As2O14] (Fig. 4), each one of these units is connected to two neighbours by means of mixed Co–O–As bridges.

The Na1 ions are split into two independent positions near c/2, Na1B has the more distorted polyhedron and the ECoN(Na1B) is as low as 5.72. The Na2 ions are also disordered with the Na2B polyhedron sandwiched by Na2A ones which are off-centred around the Na2B positions. The motion of sodium cations within the framewok of (I) by means of theoretical studies and electrical measuremeents will be the subject of future works.

For related structures, see: Ruiz-Valero et al. (1996); Ben Smail & Jouini (2005); Guesmi & Driss (2002a,b). For bond-valence analysis, see Brown (2002); Adams (2003). For the charge distribution method, see Nespolo et al. (2001); Nespolo (2001); Guesmi et al. (2006).

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1995); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1995); data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit in (I) with atom-labelling scheme. Some symmetry-related O atoms are included to show the full coordination polyhedra around the Co and As atoms. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level [Symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, y, -z+2; (ii) x, y, z-1; (iii) x, -y+1, z-1; (iv) -x+1, y, -z+1; (v) -x+1, -y+1, -z+1; (vi) x, -y+1, z; (vii) x-1/2, -y+1/2, z.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Polyhedron framework structure of (I) viewed along the c axis.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The polyhedral layers in the framework of (I); Na1 cations are on the periphery of tunnels parallel to [100].
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. The connection between the chains parallel to [001]; Na2 cations are inside the resulted tunnels.
trisodium dicobalt arsenate diarsenate top
Crystal data top
Na3Co2(AsO4)(As2O7)F(000) = 1096
Mr = 587.59Dx = 4.052 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 10.484 (3) Åθ = 11.7–14.5°
b = 16.309 (2) ŵ = 13.87 mm1
c = 6.531 (1) ÅT = 293 K
β = 120.40 (2)°Parallelepiped, pink
V = 963.2 (3) Å30.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
998 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.041
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.5°
ω/2θ scansh = 1313
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
k = 121
Tmin = 0.168, Tmax = 0.338l = 83
1765 measured reflections2 standard reflections every 120 min
1183 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0261P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.067(Δ/σ)max = 0.005
S = 1.01Δρmax = 0.72 e Å3
1183 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.80 e Å3
103 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.00124 (17)
Crystal data top
Na3Co2(AsO4)(As2O7)V = 963.2 (3) Å3
Mr = 587.59Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation
a = 10.484 (3) ŵ = 13.87 mm1
b = 16.309 (2) ÅT = 293 K
c = 6.531 (1) Å0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
β = 120.40 (2)°
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
998 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0.041
Tmin = 0.168, Tmax = 0.3382 standard reflections every 120 min
1765 measured reflections intensity decay: 1%
1183 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027103 parameters
wR(F2) = 0.0670 restraints
S = 1.01Δρmax = 0.72 e Å3
1183 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.80 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Co10.50000.32196 (5)1.00000.0091 (2)
Co20.29864 (9)0.50000.08408 (15)0.0090 (2)
As10.38970 (6)0.50000.67693 (11)0.00692 (16)
As20.11973 (5)0.33430 (3)0.76867 (8)0.00892 (14)
O10.5206 (4)0.2480 (2)0.7535 (6)0.0219 (8)
O20.2686 (3)0.3079 (2)0.7525 (6)0.0173 (7)
O30.2608 (5)0.50000.7550 (8)0.0097 (9)
O40.1460 (3)0.40124 (19)0.9821 (6)0.0136 (6)
O50.00000.3884 (3)0.50000.0133 (9)
O60.5077 (3)0.41858 (19)0.7766 (6)0.0126 (6)
O70.2869 (5)0.50000.3808 (8)0.0193 (11)
Na1A0.1740 (18)0.1692 (4)0.5940 (15)0.032 (2)0.72 (3)
Na1B0.225 (3)0.1686 (13)0.617 (4)0.032 (2)0.28 (3)
Na2A0.0488 (3)0.50000.2908 (8)0.0353 (11)0.940 (6)
Na2B0.021 (6)0.50000.054 (13)0.0353 (11)0.060 (6)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Co10.0097 (4)0.0075 (4)0.0088 (4)0.0000.0037 (3)0.000
Co20.0094 (4)0.0105 (4)0.0067 (4)0.0000.0038 (3)0.000
As10.0077 (3)0.0073 (3)0.0047 (3)0.0000.0023 (2)0.000
As20.0091 (2)0.0071 (2)0.0073 (2)0.00090 (15)0.00172 (18)0.00007 (17)
O10.0297 (19)0.0157 (17)0.015 (2)0.0132 (15)0.0073 (16)0.0024 (15)
O20.0091 (14)0.0211 (18)0.0157 (18)0.0020 (13)0.0018 (14)0.0030 (14)
O30.0093 (19)0.015 (2)0.008 (2)0.0000.0072 (18)0.000
O40.0163 (14)0.0152 (15)0.0089 (15)0.0044 (13)0.0061 (13)0.0053 (14)
O50.0128 (19)0.011 (2)0.008 (2)0.0000.0008 (18)0.000
O60.0114 (13)0.0098 (14)0.0158 (16)0.0014 (12)0.0064 (13)0.0017 (13)
O70.014 (2)0.040 (3)0.004 (2)0.0000.005 (2)0.000
Na1A0.047 (6)0.0192 (12)0.021 (2)0.012 (3)0.011 (4)0.0034 (12)
Na1B0.047 (6)0.0192 (12)0.021 (2)0.012 (3)0.011 (4)0.0034 (12)
Na2A0.0179 (15)0.0196 (17)0.059 (3)0.0000.0126 (18)0.000
Na2B0.0179 (15)0.0196 (17)0.059 (3)0.0000.0126 (18)0.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Co1—O12.108 (3)Na1A—O6viii2.621 (11)
Co1—O1i2.108 (3)Na1A—O2viii2.646 (11)
Co1—O22.141 (3)Na1A—O1vii2.682 (13)
Co1—O2i2.141 (3)Na1A—O4ix2.694 (10)
Co1—O62.177 (3)Na1A—O7viii2.782 (7)
Co1—O6i2.177 (3)Na1A—O6vii2.936 (13)
Co2—O3ii1.978 (4)Na1B—O22.39 (2)
Co2—O72.003 (5)Na1B—O2viii2.47 (2)
Co2—O4ii2.126 (3)Na1B—O4ix2.53 (2)
Co2—O4iii2.126 (3)Na1B—O7viii2.75 (2)
Co2—O6iv2.201 (3)Na1B—O1viii2.83 (2)
Co2—O6v2.201 (3)Na1B—O6viii2.87 (2)
As1—O31.669 (4)Na2A—O72.257 (5)
As1—O71.671 (5)Na2A—O52.480 (4)
As1—O6vi1.704 (3)Na2A—O5x2.480 (4)
As1—O61.704 (3)Na2A—O4xi2.501 (4)
As2—O1vii1.670 (3)Na2A—O4x2.501 (4)
As2—O21.673 (3)Na2B—O4xi2.27 (6)
As2—O41.680 (3)Na2B—O4x2.27 (6)
As2—O51.790 (2)Na2B—O4ii2.30 (5)
Na1A—O22.475 (9)Na2B—O4iii2.30 (5)
Na1A—O1viii2.540 (12)Na2B—O7xii2.51 (5)
O1—Co1—O1i110.2 (2)O3ii—Co2—O6iv94.87 (13)
O1—Co1—O282.94 (14)O7—Co2—O6iv95.48 (14)
O1i—Co1—O290.01 (14)O4ii—Co2—O6iv93.63 (12)
O1—Co1—O2i90.01 (14)O4iii—Co2—O6iv167.77 (12)
O1i—Co1—O2i82.94 (14)O3ii—Co2—O6v94.87 (13)
O2—Co1—O2i167.7 (2)O7—Co2—O6v95.48 (14)
O1—Co1—O681.33 (13)O4ii—Co2—O6v167.77 (12)
O1i—Co1—O6168.19 (14)O4iii—Co2—O6v93.63 (12)
O2—Co1—O689.07 (13)O6iv—Co2—O6v74.22 (16)
O2i—Co1—O699.88 (13)O3—As1—O7101.9 (2)
O1—Co1—O6i168.19 (14)O3—As1—O6vi115.27 (14)
O1i—Co1—O6i81.33 (13)O7—As1—O6vi111.14 (15)
O2—Co1—O6i99.88 (13)O3—As1—O6115.27 (14)
O2i—Co1—O6i89.07 (13)O7—As1—O6111.14 (14)
O6—Co1—O6i87.23 (18)O6vi—As1—O6102.4 (2)
O3ii—Co2—O7167.01 (18)O1vii—As2—O2111.18 (19)
O3ii—Co2—O4ii87.38 (12)O1vii—As2—O4114.04 (17)
O7—Co2—O4ii84.15 (12)O2—As2—O4116.98 (16)
O3ii—Co2—O4iii87.38 (12)O1vii—As2—O5103.39 (16)
O7—Co2—O4iii84.15 (12)O2—As2—O5106.19 (13)
O4ii—Co2—O4iii98.49 (17)O4—As2—O5103.43 (16)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z+2; (ii) x, y, z1; (iii) x, y+1, z1; (iv) x+1, y, z+1; (v) x+1, y+1, z+1; (vi) x, y+1, z; (vii) x1/2, y+1/2, z; (viii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (ix) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+2; (x) x, y+1, z+1; (xi) x, y, z+1; (xii) x, y+1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaNa3Co2(AsO4)(As2O7)
Mr587.59
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/m
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)10.484 (3), 16.309 (2), 6.531 (1)
β (°) 120.40 (2)
V3)963.2 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)13.87
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerEnraf–Nonius CAD-4
Absorption correctionψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Tmin, Tmax0.168, 0.338
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
1765, 1183, 998
Rint0.041
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.659
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.027, 0.067, 1.01
No. of reflections1183
No. of parameters103
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.72, 0.80

Computer programs: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1995), XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2001), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Bond-valence-sum and charge distribution analysis. top
Cationq(i).sof(i)V(i)Q(i)CN(i)ECoN(i)dmoy(i)dmed(i)
Co12.001.872.0165.972.142.14
Co22.002.052.0365.622.112.08
As15.004.995.1343.991.691.69
As25.004.934.9443.891.701.69
Na1A0.720.650.7287.332.672.63
Na1B0.280.250.2785.722.742.58
Na2A0.941.020.9275.522.582.45
Na2B0.060.070.0664.782.452.31
q(i) = formal oxidation number; sof(i) = site occupation factor; dmoy(i) = arithmetic average distance; dmed(i) = weighted average distance; sodium CNs for d(Na–O)max = 3.10 Å; σcat = dispersion factor on cationic charges measuring the deviation of the computed charges (Q) with respect to the formal oxidation numbers; σcat = [Σi(qi-Qi)2/N-1]1/2 = 0.055.
 

References

First citationAdams, S. (2003). softBV. University of Göttingen, Germany. http://kristall.uni-mki.gwdg.de/softBV/Google Scholar
First citationBen Smail, R. & Jouini, T. (2005). Anal. Chem. 30, 119–132.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationBrandenburg, K. (2001). DIAMOND. University of Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationBrown, I. D. (2002). The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry - The Bond Valence Model. IUCr Monographs on Crystallography, 12. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
First citationEnraf–Nonius (1995). CAD-4 EXPRESS. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGuesmi, A. & Driss, A. (2002a). Acta Cryst. C58, i16–i17.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGuesmi, A. & Driss, A. (2002b). J. Soc. Chem. Tunis. 4, 1675–1683.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationGuesmi, A., Nespolo, M. & Driss, A. (2006). J. Solid State Chem. 179, 2466–2471.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationHarms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4. University of Marburg, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationNespolo, M. (2001). CHARDT-IT, CRM2. University Henri Poincaré Nancy I, France.  Google Scholar
First citationNespolo, M., Ferraris, G., Ivaldi, G. & Hoppe, R. (2001). Acta Cryst. B57, 652–664.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationNorth, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationRuiz-Valero, C., Gutierrez-Puebla, E., Monge, A., Amador, U., Parada, C. & Sanz, F. (1996). J. Solid State Chem. 123, 129–139.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds