organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

P,P′-Di­phenyl­ethyl­enediphosphinic acid dihydrate

aDepartment of Chemistry, 1253 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1253, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: dtyler@uoregon.edu

(Received 1 June 2012; accepted 6 July 2012; online 14 July 2012)

The title compound, C14H16O4P2·2H2O, possesses a crystallographic inversion center where two –P(=O)(OH)(C6H5) groups are joined together via two –CH2 groups. In the crystal, the acid molecules are linked by the water molecules via O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of a two-dimensional network lying parallel to (101).

Related literature

For background on related phosphine macrocycles, see: Caminade & Majoral (1994[Caminade, A.-M. & Majoral, J. P. (1994). Chem. Rev. 94, 1183-1213.]); Swor & Tyler (2011[Swor, C. D. & Tyler, D. R. (2011). Coord. Chem. Rev. 255, 2860-2881.]). For related syntheses, see: Lambert & Desreux (2000[Lambert, B. & Desreux, J. F. (2000). Synthesis, 12, 1668-1670.]). For literature related to the use of phosphine complexes as N2 scrubbers, see: Miller et al. (2002[Miller, W. K., Gilbertson, J. D., Leiva-Paredes, C., Bernatis, P. R., Weakley, T. J. R., Lyon, D. K. & Tyler, D. R. (2002). Inorg. Chem. 41, 5453-5465.]). For a related structure, see: Costantino et al. (2008[Costantino, F., Ienco, A., Midollini, S., Orlandini, A., Sorace, L. & Vacca, A. (2008). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 3046-3055.]). For literature related to the macrocycle effect, see: Melson (1979[Melson, G. (1979). In Coordination Chemistry of Macrocyclic Compounds. New York: Plenum Press.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C14H16O4P2·2H2O

  • Mr = 346.24

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /n

  • a = 10.8280 (16) Å

  • b = 6.2455 (10) Å

  • c = 12.861 (2) Å

  • β = 91.177 (2)°

  • V = 869.5 (2) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.27 mm−1

  • T = 173 K

  • 0.27 × 0.23 × 0.12 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000[Bruker (2000). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.930, Tmax = 0.968

  • 9251 measured reflections

  • 1888 independent reflections

  • 1696 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.021

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039

  • wR(F2) = 0.109

  • S = 1.09

  • 1888 reflections

  • 112 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.39 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H1O⋯O1S 1.06 (3) 1.40 (3) 2.459 (2) 173 (2)
O1S—H1S⋯O1i 0.87 (3) 1.82 (3) 2.687 (2) 178 (3)
O1S—H2S⋯O1ii 0.91 (4) 1.78 (4) 2.682 (2) 167 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+{\script{3\over 2}}, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{3\over 2}}]; (ii) x, y+1, z.

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000[Bruker (2000). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000[Bruker (2000). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information


Comment top

In a recent publication, we showed that complexes of the type trans-Fe(P2)2Cl2 (P2 = a bidentate phosphine) will react with dinitrogen at high pressure to form trans-[Fe(P2)2(N2)Cl]+ (Miller et al., 2002). This reaction is potentially useful as a way to scrub dinitrogen from natural gas contaminated with dinitrogen. Unfortunately, the phosphine ligands in these dinitrogen-scrubbing complexes slowly dissociate in aqueous solution, leading to degradation of the complexes. This prevents a practical pressure-swing process from being developed. One potential method to obtain complexes that are more robust is to use a phosphine macrocycle in place of the two bidentate ligands. (The "macrocycle effect" predicts that the binding constant for a macrocyclic ligand is orders of magnitude higher than the binding constant for two bidentate ligands (Melson, 1979)).

In addition to their usefulness in the N2-scrubbing scheme described above, macrocyclic phosphine compounds are sought after in general as ligands for transition metal complexes because of their strong binding properties. However, the synthesis of phosphine macrocycles is a relatively underdeveloped area. One approach to macrocyclic phosphines is a template synthesis in which two secondary bidentate phosphines are coordinated to a common metal center and then covalently linked. The title molecule is both a precursor in the synthesis of the secondary bidentate phosphine 1,2-bis(phenylphosphino)ethane (MPPE, used in our laboratory for subsequent conversion into a macrocyclic phosphine ligand) and the oxidation product of MPPE. The X-ray structure of the title molecule recrystallized from ethanol has been reported (Costantino et al., 2008). As might be expected, the structure has an extensive hydrogen bonding network involving oxygen atoms (in the P=O and –OH groups) and H atoms (in the O—H groups). In contrast to the method used in this previous report, the structure reported here was recrystallized from water, which resulted in a different structure due to solvent water molecules.

The title compound has a centrosymmetrical structure where two –P(=O)(OH)(C6H5) groups are joined together via two –CH2 groups. The terminal –OH group forms a very strong O(2)—H(1O)···O(1 s) H-bond with the solvent water molecule (Figure 1 and Table 1): the O(2)···(O1s), O(2)—H(10) and O(1 s)···H(10) distances are 2.459 (2), 1.06 (3) and 1.40 (3) Å, respectively and the O(2)—H(10)···O(1 s) angle is 173 (3)°.

Related literature top

For background on related phosphine macrocycles, see: Caminade & Majoral (1994); Swor & Tyler (2011). For related syntheses, see: Lambert & Desreux (2000). For literature related to the use of phosphine complexes as N2 scubbers [scrubbers?], see: Miller et al., (2002). For a related structure, see: Costantino et al. (2008). For literature related to the macrocycle effect, see: Melson (1979).

Experimental top

The title molecule was prepared serendipitously while attempting to synthesize a phosphine macrocycle using a Cu(I) template. 1,2-Bis(phenylphosphino)ethane (MPPE) (2 equiv.) was reacted with Cu(MeCN)4PF6 (1 equiv.) in acetonitrile to yield the corresponding Cu(MPPE)2PF6 complex. A similar complex (with trifluoromethanesulfonate counter anion) was reported to be relatively air-stable for several months (Lambert & Desreux, 2000). However, after several weeks of exposure to air, the Cu(MPPE)2PF6 complex decomposed and the phosphine ligands were fully oxidized, yielding the title compound. The crude oxidized phosphine was recrystallized from water, yielding crystals of the title molecule. Note that the title compound can be reduced back to the starting secondary bis-phosphine.

Refinement top

The structure was solved using direct methods and refined with anisotropic thermal parameters for non-H atoms. H atoms in the main molecule were positioned geometrically and refined in a rigid group model, C—H = 1.2Ueq(C) for –CH2 and –CH groups. H atoms in the terminal –OH group and in a solvent water molecule involved in intermolecular H-bonds were found from the residual density and refined with isotropic thermal parameters. There are some alongations of thermal parameters of the carbon atoms in the phenyl rings indicating that the phenyl rings in the structure are flexible.

Structure description top

In a recent publication, we showed that complexes of the type trans-Fe(P2)2Cl2 (P2 = a bidentate phosphine) will react with dinitrogen at high pressure to form trans-[Fe(P2)2(N2)Cl]+ (Miller et al., 2002). This reaction is potentially useful as a way to scrub dinitrogen from natural gas contaminated with dinitrogen. Unfortunately, the phosphine ligands in these dinitrogen-scrubbing complexes slowly dissociate in aqueous solution, leading to degradation of the complexes. This prevents a practical pressure-swing process from being developed. One potential method to obtain complexes that are more robust is to use a phosphine macrocycle in place of the two bidentate ligands. (The "macrocycle effect" predicts that the binding constant for a macrocyclic ligand is orders of magnitude higher than the binding constant for two bidentate ligands (Melson, 1979)).

In addition to their usefulness in the N2-scrubbing scheme described above, macrocyclic phosphine compounds are sought after in general as ligands for transition metal complexes because of their strong binding properties. However, the synthesis of phosphine macrocycles is a relatively underdeveloped area. One approach to macrocyclic phosphines is a template synthesis in which two secondary bidentate phosphines are coordinated to a common metal center and then covalently linked. The title molecule is both a precursor in the synthesis of the secondary bidentate phosphine 1,2-bis(phenylphosphino)ethane (MPPE, used in our laboratory for subsequent conversion into a macrocyclic phosphine ligand) and the oxidation product of MPPE. The X-ray structure of the title molecule recrystallized from ethanol has been reported (Costantino et al., 2008). As might be expected, the structure has an extensive hydrogen bonding network involving oxygen atoms (in the P=O and –OH groups) and H atoms (in the O—H groups). In contrast to the method used in this previous report, the structure reported here was recrystallized from water, which resulted in a different structure due to solvent water molecules.

The title compound has a centrosymmetrical structure where two –P(=O)(OH)(C6H5) groups are joined together via two –CH2 groups. The terminal –OH group forms a very strong O(2)—H(1O)···O(1 s) H-bond with the solvent water molecule (Figure 1 and Table 1): the O(2)···(O1s), O(2)—H(10) and O(1 s)···H(10) distances are 2.459 (2), 1.06 (3) and 1.40 (3) Å, respectively and the O(2)—H(10)···O(1 s) angle is 173 (3)°.

For background on related phosphine macrocycles, see: Caminade & Majoral (1994); Swor & Tyler (2011). For related syntheses, see: Lambert & Desreux (2000). For literature related to the use of phosphine complexes as N2 scubbers [scrubbers?], see: Miller et al., (2002). For a related structure, see: Costantino et al. (2008). For literature related to the macrocycle effect, see: Melson (1979).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A fragment of the crystal structure of P,P'-diphenylethylenediphosphinic acid with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atom-numbering scheme. [Symmetry code (A): -x,-y,-z].
P,P'-Diphenylethylenediphosphinic acid dihydrate top
Crystal data top
C14H16O4P2·2H2OF(000) = 364
Mr = 346.24Dx = 1.322 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 4007 reflections
a = 10.8280 (16) Åθ = 2.4–28.0°
b = 6.2455 (10) ŵ = 0.27 mm1
c = 12.861 (2) ÅT = 173 K
β = 91.177 (2)°Block, colorless
V = 869.5 (2) Å30.27 × 0.23 × 0.12 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Bruker APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1888 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1696 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
h = 1313
Tmin = 0.930, Tmax = 0.968k = 77
9251 measured reflectionsl = 1616
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.109H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.09 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0533P)2 + 0.4488P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1888 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
112 parametersΔρmax = 0.41 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.38 e Å3
Crystal data top
C14H16O4P2·2H2OV = 869.5 (2) Å3
Mr = 346.24Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 10.8280 (16) ŵ = 0.27 mm1
b = 6.2455 (10) ÅT = 173 K
c = 12.861 (2) Å0.27 × 0.23 × 0.12 mm
β = 91.177 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1888 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
1696 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.930, Tmax = 0.968Rint = 0.021
9251 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0390 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.109H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.09Δρmax = 0.41 e Å3
1888 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.38 e Å3
112 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)

are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken

into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles

and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only

used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)

treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
P10.84023 (4)0.19271 (7)0.54585 (3)0.02826 (16)
O10.77895 (12)0.0487 (2)0.62175 (10)0.0395 (3)
O20.92075 (11)0.3728 (2)0.59502 (10)0.0368 (3)
C10.94816 (15)0.0518 (3)0.46715 (13)0.0318 (4)
H1B0.90390.06070.42700.038*
H1C0.98470.15270.41700.038*
C20.72834 (16)0.3127 (3)0.45984 (14)0.0356 (4)
C30.6126 (2)0.2218 (6)0.4494 (2)0.0835 (10)
H3A0.59260.09830.48870.100*
C40.5256 (3)0.3103 (9)0.3818 (3)0.1219 (18)
H4A0.44670.24520.37370.146*
C50.5523 (3)0.4894 (7)0.3271 (2)0.0949 (12)
H5A0.49100.55190.28270.114*
C60.6673 (3)0.5807 (5)0.3356 (2)0.0762 (8)
H6A0.68610.70470.29610.091*
C70.7566 (2)0.4916 (4)0.40205 (17)0.0526 (5)
H7A0.83660.55370.40760.063*
O1S0.8284 (2)0.6587 (3)0.69946 (14)0.0622 (5)
H1O0.875 (2)0.491 (4)0.6401 (19)0.062 (7)*
H1S0.792 (3)0.621 (5)0.756 (3)0.086 (10)*
H2S0.801 (3)0.783 (6)0.670 (3)0.092 (10)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
P10.0299 (2)0.0269 (3)0.0281 (2)0.00257 (16)0.00540 (16)0.00037 (15)
O10.0459 (7)0.0341 (7)0.0390 (7)0.0028 (6)0.0142 (6)0.0059 (5)
O20.0347 (6)0.0363 (7)0.0395 (7)0.0003 (5)0.0030 (5)0.0077 (6)
C10.0347 (9)0.0328 (9)0.0280 (8)0.0056 (7)0.0050 (7)0.0023 (7)
C20.0308 (9)0.0425 (10)0.0337 (9)0.0061 (7)0.0022 (7)0.0010 (7)
C30.0406 (12)0.131 (3)0.0778 (18)0.0223 (16)0.0133 (12)0.0428 (19)
C40.0413 (14)0.226 (5)0.097 (2)0.011 (2)0.0203 (15)0.066 (3)
C50.0592 (17)0.166 (4)0.0587 (16)0.044 (2)0.0078 (13)0.028 (2)
C60.103 (2)0.0722 (18)0.0535 (14)0.0296 (17)0.0077 (14)0.0196 (13)
C70.0597 (13)0.0459 (12)0.0518 (12)0.0027 (10)0.0082 (10)0.0102 (10)
O1S0.1045 (15)0.0336 (8)0.0501 (9)0.0127 (8)0.0378 (10)0.0049 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
P1—O11.4928 (13)C3—H3A0.9500
P1—O21.5500 (13)C4—C51.355 (5)
P1—C21.7883 (18)C4—H4A0.9500
P1—C11.7927 (16)C5—C61.373 (5)
O2—H1O1.06 (3)C5—H5A0.9500
C1—C1i1.534 (3)C6—C71.393 (3)
C1—H1B0.9900C6—H6A0.9500
C1—H1C0.9900C7—H7A0.9500
C2—C71.380 (3)O1S—H1O1.40 (3)
C2—C31.380 (3)O1S—H1S0.87 (3)
C3—C41.383 (4)O1S—H2S0.91 (4)
O1—P1—O2115.11 (8)C2—C3—H3A119.9
O1—P1—C2110.63 (8)C4—C3—H3A119.9
O2—P1—C2108.45 (8)C5—C4—C3120.4 (3)
O1—P1—C1112.15 (8)C5—C4—H4A119.8
O2—P1—C1102.64 (8)C3—C4—H4A119.8
C2—P1—C1107.32 (8)C4—C5—C6120.3 (2)
P1—O2—H1O117.6 (14)C4—C5—H5A119.9
C1i—C1—P1111.97 (15)C6—C5—H5A119.9
C1i—C1—H1B109.2C5—C6—C7120.0 (3)
P1—C1—H1B109.2C5—C6—H6A120.0
C1i—C1—H1C109.2C7—C6—H6A120.0
P1—C1—H1C109.2C2—C7—C6119.7 (2)
H1B—C1—H1C107.9C2—C7—H7A120.2
C7—C2—C3119.5 (2)C6—C7—H7A120.2
C7—C2—P1121.16 (15)H1O—O1S—H1S116 (2)
C3—C2—P1119.37 (18)H1O—O1S—H2S122 (2)
C2—C3—C4120.1 (3)H1S—O1S—H2S116 (3)
O1—P1—C1—C1i60.33 (19)C7—C2—C3—C40.3 (5)
O2—P1—C1—C1i63.78 (18)P1—C2—C3—C4178.9 (3)
C2—P1—C1—C1i177.97 (16)C2—C3—C4—C51.5 (6)
O1—P1—C2—C7162.61 (16)C3—C4—C5—C62.2 (6)
O2—P1—C2—C735.49 (19)C4—C5—C6—C71.2 (5)
C1—P1—C2—C774.74 (18)C3—C2—C7—C61.3 (4)
O1—P1—C2—C318.8 (3)P1—C2—C7—C6179.83 (19)
O2—P1—C2—C3146.0 (2)C5—C6—C7—C20.6 (4)
C1—P1—C2—C3103.8 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x+2, y, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H1O···O1S1.06 (3)1.40 (3)2.459 (2)173 (2)
O1S—H1S···O1ii0.87 (3)1.82 (3)2.687 (2)178 (3)
O1S—H2S···O1iii0.91 (4)1.78 (4)2.682 (2)167 (3)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (iii) x, y+1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC14H16O4P2·2H2O
Mr346.24
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)10.8280 (16), 6.2455 (10), 12.861 (2)
β (°) 91.177 (2)
V3)869.5 (2)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.27
Crystal size (mm)0.27 × 0.23 × 0.12
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEX CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
Tmin, Tmax0.930, 0.968
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
9251, 1888, 1696
Rint0.021
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.639
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.039, 0.109, 1.09
No. of reflections1888
No. of parameters112
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.41, 0.38

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2000), SAINT (Bruker, 2000), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H1O···O1S1.06 (3)1.40 (3)2.459 (2)173 (2)
O1S—H1S···O1i0.87 (3)1.82 (3)2.687 (2)178 (3)
O1S—H2S···O1ii0.91 (4)1.78 (4)2.682 (2)167 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (ii) x, y+1, z.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the NSF for funding.

References

First citationBruker (2000). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationCaminade, A.-M. & Majoral, J. P. (1994). Chem. Rev. 94, 1183–1213.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationCostantino, F., Ienco, A., Midollini, S., Orlandini, A., Sorace, L. & Vacca, A. (2008). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 3046–3055.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationLambert, B. & Desreux, J. F. (2000). Synthesis, 12, 1668–1670.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationMelson, G. (1979). In Coordination Chemistry of Macrocyclic Compounds. New York: Plenum Press.  Google Scholar
First citationMiller, W. K., Gilbertson, J. D., Leiva-Paredes, C., Bernatis, P. R., Weakley, T. J. R., Lyon, D. K. & Tyler, D. R. (2002). Inorg. Chem. 41, 5453–5465.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSwor, C. D. & Tyler, D. R. (2011). Coord. Chem. Rev. 255, 2860–2881.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds