metal-organic compounds
catena-Poly[[bis(thiocyanato-κN)cobalt(II)]-di-μ-thiourea-κ4S:S]
aDepartment of Physics, Rajeswari Vedachalam Government Arts College, Chengalpet 603 301, India, bResearch and Development Center, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 641 046, India, and cDepartment of Physics, Thanthai Periyar Government Institute of Technology, Vellore 632 002, India
*Correspondence e-mail: drkrr2007@gmail.com, smurugavel27@gmail.com
In the title polymeric complex, [Co(NCS)2{SC(NH2)2}2]n, the comprises a CoII ion, which is situated on an inversion centre, an N-bound thiocyanate anion and a μ2-bridging thiourea molecule. The CoII atom is coordinated in a distorted octahedral fashion within an N2S4 donor set. The bridging thiourea ligands link CoII ions into a polymeric chain extending along [100]. The molecular conformation is stabilized by intramolecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, which generate S(6) ring motifs. The crystal packing is stabilized by N—H⋯S interactions, which connect the chains into a three-dimensional architecture.
Related literature
For a general introduction to thiocyanato complexes, see: Nardelli et al. (1957). For the of the analogous CdII complex, see: Wang et al. (2002). For information on the properties of complexes incorporating these ligands, see: Yuan et al. (1997); Yu et al. (2001); Machura et al. (2011). For the use of CoII complexes with mixed S-donor ligands as precursors to CoS, see: Kropidłowska et al. (2008). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT and XPREP (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia (1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536812033193/tk5133sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536812033193/tk5133Isup2.hkl
Cobalt(II) chloride, ammonium thiocynate and thiourea were dissolved in aqueous solution in the molar ratio 1:2:2 and stirred well for 2 h to obtain an homogeneous mixture. The dark-brown crystals of the title compound were obtained after the filtrate and had been allowed to stand at room temperature for two weeks.
H atoms were positioned geometrically, with N—H = 0.86 Å and constrained to ride on their parent atom, with Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(N).
The interest in the coordination compounds possessing both thiourea and thiocyanato ligands dates back to the 1950's (e.g. Nardelli et al., 1957) when the nature of coordination compounds formed by divalent cations (M = Mn, Co, Ni, Cd, Pb) and organic molecules containing sulfur was extensively studied. The interest in these compounds is related either to their non-linear optical properties (Yuan et al., 1997, Yu et al., 2001) or with their possible use as single-source precursors of semiconducting materials. Moreover, the use of SCN ligands, with bridging abilities, may lead to intriguing architectures and topologies, often generating one-dimensional chains (Machura et al., 2011). For the above reasons and during our studies on new molecular precursors (Kropidłowska et al., 2008), we turned our attention to systems of this type, that is, complexes containing thiourea and thiocyanate ligands connected to a cobalt center.
The title complex, Fig. 1, is isostructural with the previously reported cadmium(II) complex (Wang et al., 2002). The CoII atom is located at the inversion centre and is octahedrally coordinated by two N atoms from two thiocynate groups and four S atoms from four thiourea molecules. The bridging thiourea ligands link CoII ions into a one dimensional polymeric chain along [100] (Fig. 2). The Co···Co distance along the chain is 3.855 (3) Å. The octahedral coordination sphere of the cobalt(II) cation is slightly distorted with distances in the range of 2.016 (1) Å to 2.623 (1) Å. The angles around the cobalt(II) atom range from 83.4 (1)° to 180°. The thiocynate group is almost linear with the N1—C1—S1 angle = 179.2 (1)°.
The
is stabilized by intramolecular N2—H2B···N1 hydrogen bond, forming an S(6) ring motif (Bernstein et al., 1995). In the crystal, molecules are linked by N—H···S hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional architecture (Table 1).For a general introduction to thiocyanato complexes, see: Nardelli et al. (1957). For the
of the analogous CdII complex, see: Wang et al. (2002). For information on the properties of complexes incorporating these ligands, see: Yuan et al. (1997); Yu et al. (2001); Machura et al. (2011). For the use of CoII complexes with mixed S-donor ligands as precursors to CoS, see: Kropidłowska et al. (2008). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995).Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell
APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT and XPREP (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia (1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).[Co(NCS)2(CH4N2S)2] | Z = 1 |
Mr = 327.33 | F(000) = 165 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.925 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -P 1 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 3.855 (3) Å | Cell parameters from 2298 reflections |
b = 7.585 (2) Å | θ = 2.0–34.1° |
c = 10.094 (2) Å | µ = 2.23 mm−1 |
α = 92.424 (3)° | T = 293 K |
β = 98.172 (2)° | Block, brown |
γ = 104.166 (2)° | 0.24 × 0.22 × 0.16 mm |
V = 282.4 (2) Å3 |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 1844 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1764 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.026 |
Detector resolution: 10.0 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 34.1°, θmin = 2.0° |
ω scans | h = −5→5 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | k = −11→10 |
Tmin = 0.591, Tmax = 0.699 | l = −14→15 |
6452 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.052 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0264P)2 + 0.0757P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.07 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
1844 reflections | Δρmax = 0.61 e Å−3 |
71 parameters | Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.203 (7) |
[Co(NCS)2(CH4N2S)2] | γ = 104.166 (2)° |
Mr = 327.33 | V = 282.4 (2) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 1 |
a = 3.855 (3) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 7.585 (2) Å | µ = 2.23 mm−1 |
c = 10.094 (2) Å | T = 293 K |
α = 92.424 (3)° | 0.24 × 0.22 × 0.16 mm |
β = 98.172 (2)° |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 1844 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 1764 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.591, Tmax = 0.699 | Rint = 0.026 |
6452 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.052 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.07 | Δρmax = 0.61 e Å−3 |
1844 reflections | Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3 |
71 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.5577 (3) | 0.18192 (15) | 0.78972 (10) | 0.01952 (19) | |
C2 | 0.9805 (3) | −0.29358 (15) | 0.69572 (11) | 0.02016 (19) | |
N1 | 0.5889 (3) | 0.10262 (13) | 0.69282 (9) | 0.02280 (18) | |
N2 | 0.9447 (3) | −0.19551 (16) | 0.80075 (10) | 0.0295 (2) | |
H2A | 0.9899 | −0.2301 | 0.8800 | 0.035* | |
H2B | 0.8759 | −0.0966 | 0.7903 | 0.035* | |
N3 | 1.0858 (3) | −0.44519 (15) | 0.71126 (11) | 0.0324 (2) | |
H3A | 1.1313 | −0.4801 | 0.7904 | 0.039* | |
H3B | 1.1091 | −0.5092 | 0.6423 | 0.039* | |
S1 | 0.51233 (9) | 0.29477 (5) | 0.92362 (3) | 0.03241 (9) | |
S2 | 0.89332 (7) | −0.22779 (3) | 0.53449 (2) | 0.01878 (8) | |
Co | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.5000 | 0.01874 (8) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0193 (4) | 0.0231 (5) | 0.0165 (4) | 0.0073 (4) | 0.0011 (3) | 0.0004 (3) |
C2 | 0.0189 (4) | 0.0209 (5) | 0.0200 (4) | 0.0033 (4) | 0.0031 (3) | 0.0046 (4) |
N1 | 0.0259 (4) | 0.0256 (4) | 0.0169 (4) | 0.0078 (4) | 0.0022 (3) | −0.0016 (3) |
N2 | 0.0430 (6) | 0.0313 (5) | 0.0173 (4) | 0.0147 (4) | 0.0056 (4) | 0.0040 (4) |
N3 | 0.0484 (6) | 0.0269 (5) | 0.0256 (5) | 0.0173 (5) | 0.0027 (4) | 0.0072 (4) |
S1 | 0.03586 (17) | 0.0469 (2) | 0.01841 (14) | 0.02104 (14) | 0.00223 (11) | −0.00877 (12) |
S2 | 0.02254 (13) | 0.01991 (13) | 0.01566 (12) | 0.00861 (9) | 0.00307 (9) | 0.00202 (8) |
Co | 0.02202 (11) | 0.02291 (12) | 0.01230 (10) | 0.00862 (8) | 0.00200 (7) | −0.00215 (7) |
C1—N1 | 1.1627 (14) | N3—H3A | 0.8600 |
C1—S1 | 1.6226 (11) | N3—H3B | 0.8600 |
C2—N2 | 1.3121 (15) | S2—Co | 2.5668 (10) |
C2—N3 | 1.3182 (15) | S2—Coi | 2.6231 (14) |
C2—S2 | 1.7338 (11) | Co—N1ii | 2.0158 (10) |
N1—Co | 2.0158 (10) | Co—S2ii | 2.5668 (10) |
N2—H2A | 0.8600 | Co—S2iii | 2.6231 (14) |
N2—H2B | 0.8600 | Co—S2iv | 2.6231 (14) |
N1—C1—S1 | 179.17 (10) | N1—Co—S2ii | 83.37 (3) |
N2—C2—N3 | 120.18 (11) | N1ii—Co—S2ii | 96.63 (3) |
N2—C2—S2 | 121.31 (9) | N1—Co—S2 | 96.63 (3) |
N3—C2—S2 | 118.50 (9) | N1ii—Co—S2 | 83.37 (3) |
C1—N1—Co | 160.34 (9) | S2ii—Co—S2 | 180.000 (11) |
C2—N2—H2A | 120.0 | N1—Co—S2iii | 88.73 (3) |
C2—N2—H2B | 120.0 | N1ii—Co—S2iii | 91.27 (3) |
H2A—N2—H2B | 120.0 | S2ii—Co—S2iii | 95.93 (5) |
C2—N3—H3A | 120.0 | S2—Co—S2iii | 84.07 (5) |
C2—N3—H3B | 120.0 | N1—Co—S2iv | 91.27 (3) |
H3A—N3—H3B | 120.0 | N1ii—Co—S2iv | 88.73 (3) |
C2—S2—Co | 117.06 (4) | S2ii—Co—S2iv | 84.07 (5) |
C2—S2—Coi | 104.64 (4) | S2—Co—S2iv | 95.93 (5) |
Co—S2—Coi | 95.93 (5) | S2iii—Co—S2iv | 180.000 (11) |
N1—Co—N1ii | 180.0 | ||
S1—C1—N1—Co | −33 (7) | C2—S2—Co—N1 | 21.76 (5) |
N2—C2—S2—Co | −19.76 (11) | Coi—S2—Co—N1 | −88.02 (3) |
N3—C2—S2—Co | 160.47 (8) | C2—S2—Co—N1ii | −158.24 (5) |
N2—C2—S2—Coi | 84.92 (10) | Coi—S2—Co—N1ii | 91.98 (3) |
N3—C2—S2—Coi | −94.85 (10) | C2—S2—Co—S2ii | −117 (100) |
C1—N1—Co—N1ii | −140 (100) | Coi—S2—Co—S2ii | 133 (100) |
C1—N1—Co—S2ii | 12.8 (3) | C2—S2—Co—S2iii | 109.79 (4) |
C1—N1—Co—S2 | −167.2 (3) | Coi—S2—Co—S2iii | 0.0 |
C1—N1—Co—S2iii | 108.9 (3) | C2—S2—Co—S2iv | −70.21 (4) |
C1—N1—Co—S2iv | −71.1 (3) | Coi—S2—Co—S2iv | 180.0 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iii) −x+2, −y, −z+1; (iv) x−1, y, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H2B···N1 | 0.86 | 2.26 | 3.079 (3) | 159 |
N2—H2A···S1v | 0.86 | 2.70 | 3.461 (3) | 148 |
N3—H3A···S1vi | 0.86 | 2.78 | 3.483 (3) | 140 |
N3—H3B···S2vii | 0.86 | 2.62 | 3.456 (3) | 166 |
Symmetry codes: (v) −x+2, −y, −z+2; (vi) x+1, y−1, z; (vii) −x+2, −y−1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Co(NCS)2(CH4N2S)2] |
Mr | 327.33 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 3.855 (3), 7.585 (2), 10.094 (2) |
α, β, γ (°) | 92.424 (3), 98.172 (2), 104.166 (2) |
V (Å3) | 282.4 (2) |
Z | 1 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 2.23 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.24 × 0.22 × 0.16 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII CCD |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.591, 0.699 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 6452, 1844, 1764 |
Rint | 0.026 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.789 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.019, 0.052, 1.07 |
No. of reflections | 1844 |
No. of parameters | 71 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.61, −0.33 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004), APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2004), SAINT and XPREP (Bruker, 2004), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia (1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N2—H2B···N1 | 0.86 | 2.26 | 3.079 (3) | 159.0 |
N2—H2A···S1i | 0.86 | 2.70 | 3.461 (3) | 147.6 |
N3—H3A···S1ii | 0.86 | 2.78 | 3.483 (3) | 139.7 |
N3—H3B···S2iii | 0.86 | 2.62 | 3.456 (3) | 165.6 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y, −z+2; (ii) x+1, y−1, z; (iii) −x+2, −y−1, −z+1. |
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr Babu Varghese, SAIF, IIT, Madras, India, for his help with the data collection.
References
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bruker (2004). APEX2, SAINT and XPREP. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kropidłowska, A., Chojnacki, J., Fahmi, A. & Becker, B. (2008). Dalton Trans. pp. 6825–6831. Google Scholar
Machura, B., Nawrot, I. & Michalik, K. (2011). Polyhedron, 30, 2619–2626. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nardelli, M., Braibanti, A. & Fava, G. (1957). Gazz. Chim. Ital. 87, 1209–1231. CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wang, X. Q., Yu, W. T., Xu, D., Lu, M. K. & Yuan, D. R. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, m336–m337. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yu, W.-T., Wang, X.-Q., Xu, D., Lu, M.-K. & Yuan, D.-R. (2001). Acta Cryst. C57, 145–146. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yuan, D. R., Xu, D., Fang, Q., Yu, W. T. & Jiang, M. H. (1997). Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 544–546. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The interest in the coordination compounds possessing both thiourea and thiocyanato ligands dates back to the 1950's (e.g. Nardelli et al., 1957) when the nature of coordination compounds formed by divalent cations (M = Mn, Co, Ni, Cd, Pb) and organic molecules containing sulfur was extensively studied. The interest in these compounds is related either to their non-linear optical properties (Yuan et al., 1997, Yu et al., 2001) or with their possible use as single-source precursors of semiconducting materials. Moreover, the use of SCN ligands, with bridging abilities, may lead to intriguing architectures and topologies, often generating one-dimensional chains (Machura et al., 2011). For the above reasons and during our studies on new molecular precursors (Kropidłowska et al., 2008), we turned our attention to systems of this type, that is, complexes containing thiourea and thiocyanate ligands connected to a cobalt center.
The title complex, Fig. 1, is isostructural with the previously reported cadmium(II) complex (Wang et al., 2002). The CoII atom is located at the inversion centre and is octahedrally coordinated by two N atoms from two thiocynate groups and four S atoms from four thiourea molecules. The bridging thiourea ligands link CoII ions into a one dimensional polymeric chain along [100] (Fig. 2). The Co···Co distance along the chain is 3.855 (3) Å. The octahedral coordination sphere of the cobalt(II) cation is slightly distorted with distances in the range of 2.016 (1) Å to 2.623 (1) Å. The angles around the cobalt(II) atom range from 83.4 (1)° to 180°. The thiocynate group is almost linear with the N1—C1—S1 angle = 179.2 (1)°.
The molecular conformation is stabilized by intramolecular N2—H2B···N1 hydrogen bond, forming an S(6) ring motif (Bernstein et al., 1995). In the crystal, molecules are linked by N—H···S hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional architecture (Table 1).