2,2′-[(1E,2E)-1,2-Bis(hy­droxy­imino)­ethane-1,2-di­yl]dipyridinium hexa­chloridorhenate(IV)

Krawczyk, M.K.; Krawczyk, M.S.; Siczek, M.; Lis, T.

doi:10.1107/S1600536812035052

metal-organic compounds

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 68| Part 9| September 2012| Pages m1174-m1175

doi:10.1107/S1600536812035052

Open

access

2,2′-[(1E,2E)-1,2-Bis(hydroxyimino)ethane-1,2-diyl]dipyridinium hexachloridorhenate(IV)

Monika K. Krawczyk,^a ^* Marta S. Krawczyk,^a Miłosz Siczek ^a and Tadeusz Lis ^a

^aUniversity of Wrocław, Faculty of Chemistry, 14 Joliot-Curie St, 50-383 Wrocław, Poland
^*Correspondence e-mail: monikakrawczyk.k@gmail.com

(Received 19 July 2012; accepted 8 August 2012; online 15 August 2012)

The title salt, (C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆], consists of 2,2′-[(1E,2E)-1,2-bis(hydroxyimino)ethane-1,2-diyl]dipyridinium cations and [ReCl₆]²⁻ anions which are both located on inversion centres. Each cation consists of a glyoxime moiety attached to two protonated pyridine rings in ortho positions. In the crystal, E,E isomers of the cation are observed which differ in the spatial arrangement of the pyridine rings. These rings are positionally disordered over two positions with site-occupancy factors of 0.786 (7) and 0.214 (7). The geometry of the cation is compared with that of a recently reported dipyridylglyoxime with the same configuration. The cations and anions are involved in a network of intermolecular O—H⋯Cl, N—H⋯Cl and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds.

Related literature

For the synthesis of K₂[ReCl₆], see: Enk (1931 ). For syntheses and research on dipyridylglyoxime, see: Soules et al. (1970 ); Richardson et al. (2002 ). For the structure of the [ReCl₆]²⁻ ion, see: Takazawa et al. (1990 ); Hołyńska et al. (2007 ). For structures of rhenium compounds with monooximes, see: Jurisson et al. (1991 , 1998 ). For background to π–π interactions, see: Janiak (2000 ). For related structures of the reported cation, see: Richardson & Steel (2000 ); Sabaté & Delalu (2012 ).

Experimental

Crystal data

(C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆]
M_r = 643.16
Triclinic, $[P \overline 1]$
a = 7.836 (3) Å
b = 8.051 (3) Å
c = 8.733 (3) Å
α = 85.44 (3)°
β = 73.85 (3)°
γ = 65.12 (4)°
V = 479.6 (3) Å³
Z = 1
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 7.18 mm⁻¹
T = 100 K
0.15 × 0.06 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Agilent Xcalibur PX KM-4-CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011 ) T_min = 0.439, T_max = 0.841
9670 measured reflections
4738 independent reflections
4464 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R_int = 0.026

Refinement

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.025
wR(F²) = 0.039
S = 1.02
4738 reflections
126 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max = 1.41 e Å⁻³
Δρ_min = −1.02 e Å⁻³

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯Cl2ⁱ	0.84	2.43	3.2034 (19)	154
N12—H12⋯Cl2ⁱⁱ	0.88	2.44	3.318 (3)	179
N32—H32⋯Cl3ⁱⁱⁱ	0.88	2.75	3.416 (9)	133
N32—H32⋯Cl1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.88	2.81	3.495 (8)	136
C13—H13⋯Cl2^iv	0.95	2.66	3.550 (4)	157
C16—H16⋯Cl3ⁱⁱⁱ	0.95	2.79	3.658 (4)	152
C36—H36⋯Cl2ⁱⁱ	0.95	2.68	3.581 (7)	159
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z+1; (ii) -x, -y+1, -z+1; (iii) -x+1, -y+1, -z; (iv) x, y+1, z+1.

Table 2
Selected interatomic distances (Å) and angles (°) for (C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆] and C₁₂H₁₀N₄O₂ (see also Sabaté & Delalu, 2012)

(C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆]		C₁₂H₁₀N₄O₂
C1—C1^v	1.472 (3)	C7—C7ⁱⁱ	1.468 (3)
C1—C11	1.482 (3)	C7—C2	1.501 (2)
C1—N1	1.290 (2)	C7—N8	1.289 (2)
N1—O1	1.3844 (19)	N8—O9	1.392 (2)
C1—N1—O1	111.88 (14)	C7—N8—O9	112.6 (1)
C1^v—C1—N1	116.75 (18)	C7ⁱⁱ—C7—N8	116.0 (2)
C11—C1—C1^v	119.1 (3)	C2—C7—C7ⁱⁱ	119.5 (1)
Re—Cl1	2.3500 (10)
Re—Cl2	2.3707 (9)
Re—Cl3	2.3531 (15)
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (v) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z.

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ).

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812035052/vn2047sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812035052/vn2047Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report

Comment top

In the crystallographic literature many metal complexes with dioximes have been reported. In the case of rhenium compounds there are three crystal structures with coordinated monooximes (Jurisson et al., 1991; Jurisson et al., 1998), while the complexes of Re with dioximes were not reported. Therefore, it seemed an attractive idea to obtain new compounds of rhenium with dioximes. As a result of our initial attempts we obtained a new rhenium salt of the formula (C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆]. The cation is a protonated form of (1E,2E)-2,2'-dipyridylglyoxime, C₁₂H₁₀N₄O₂ [or (1E,2E)-N,N'-dihydroxy-1,2-di(pyridin-2-yl)ethane-1,2-diimine or (1E,2E)-1,2-di(pyridin-2-yl)ethanedione dioxime]. The crystal structure of (1E,2E)-2,2'-dipyridylglyoxime was recently reported by Sabaté & Delalu (2012). In the literature there is known one structure which contains a cyclic form of the C₁₂H₁₀N₄O₂ dioxime as a di(2-pyridyl)furoxan coordinated to copper(II) (Richardson & Steel, 2000). The C₁₂H₁₀N₄O₂ dioxime was initially obtained by Soules et al., (1970). Another preparating method was published by Richardson et al., (2002).

In the crystal structure reported here both cation and anion are centrosymmetric. The cation is built up by the planar glyoxime fragment, HO—N=C—C=N—OH and two protonated pyridyl rings. The pyridyl groups are attached to the dioxime unit via C atoms located at the ortho positions with respect to the N atoms. The (C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)²⁺ unit may adopt many geometries because of the conformations of the glyoxime moiety (resulting in E,E, E,Z or Z,Z isomers) and spatial arrangement of pyridyl rings in relation to the HO—N=C—C=N—OH fragment. In the studied crystal structure the cations are the E,E isomers where the glyoxime moieties form interplanar angles of about 55° with planes of aromatic rings. Similar values of the geometrical parameters are observed compared to those published by Sabaté & Delalu (2012) (Table 2) for (1E,2E)-2,2'-dipyridylglyoxime. However slight differences in overall geometries can be distinguished. Contrary to the studied cation, in the dioxime structure published previously the planar HO—N=C—C=N—OH unit is perpendicular to the planes of aromatic rings. The results reported here for the rhenium salt reveal that the presence of H atoms bonded to N atoms in aromatic rings involved in N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds (Table 1) as well as the mutual arrangement of (C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)²⁺ and [ReCl₆]^2- ions influence the overall geometry of the cation compared to dipyridylglyoxime.

As was mentioned before, the two pyridyl rings are bonded via C atoms in ortho positions to the planar glyoxime moiety (viz. to C1 atoms). The aromatic rings are disordered over two positions and turned to each other by an angle of about 180° (Fig. 1). The pyridyl rings of the major-occupancy form an interplanar angle of 55.4 (1)° with the glyoxime unit, while the aromatic rings of the minor-occupancy form an angle of 60.2 (3)°. The observed disorder can be interpreted as a solid solution of isomers of the cation due to the arrangement of pyridyl groups, where the glyoxime units have the same geometry. The disorder can be considered in three ways. In the first case the two centrosymmetric conformers can be in the crystal which occur in 78 and 22%. In the second one the three isomers can be observed: one centrosymmetric in 56% and two noncentrosymmetric both in 22%. In the third case the four conformers can be considered: two centrosymmetric and two noncentrosymmetric. In all the cases the preferred conformer is the centrosymmetric one for which the pyridyl rings form the interplanar angle of 55.4 (1)° with HO—N=C—C=N—OH entity.

In the title compound the hexachloridorhenate(IV) counterion has a slightly distorted octahedral geometry. Two of the three crystallographically independent Re—Cl bond lengths [2.3500 (10) and 2.3531 (15) Å] are comparable with 2.3545 (9) Å in [ReCl₆]^2- published by Takazawa et al., (1990). The third one is longer [2.3707 (9) Å] which can be explained by the involvement of Cl atom in the O—H···Cl and N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds (Table 1). This value is slightly longer than the Re—Cl bond lenghts [2.3604 (11) and 2.3644 (12) Å] for [ReCl₆]^2- published by Hołyńska et al., (2007) where only weak C—H···Cl hydrogen bonds are observed.

The crystal structure of (C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆] is stabilized by a network of O—H···Cl, N—H···Cl and C—H···Cl hydrogen bonds (Table 1) as well as π···π stacking interactions of parallel displaced pyridyl rings (Janiak 2000). The studied crystal structure reveals a layer architecture viewed down the [010] direction (Fig. 2). The cations are arranged in ribbons extended along the [-111] direction and interact with [ReCl₆]^2- ions via hydrogen bonds (Table 1, Fig. 3). The (C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)²⁺ ions within ribbons are also involved in π···π interactions with centroid-centroid distance of 3.878 (2) Å and an slip angle of 26.99 (1)° (Cg···Cg^vii, Cg = C11/N12/C13/C14/C15/C16, (vii)–x, -y + 2, -z + 1) (calculated with DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006)) (Fig. 4).

Related literature top

For the synthesis of K₂ReCl₆, see: Enk (1931). For syntheses and research on dipyridylglyoxime, see: Soules et al. (1970); Richardson et al. (2002). For the structure of the ReCl₆^2- ion, see: Takazawa et al. (1990); Hołyńska et al. (2007). For structures of rhenium compounds with monooximes, see: Jurisson et al. (1991, 1998). For background to π–π interactions, see: Janiak (2000). For related structures of the reported cation, see: Richardson & Steel (2000); Sabaté & Delalu (2012).

Experimental top

(1E,2E)-2,2'-dipyridylglyoxime, C₁₂H₁₀N₄O₂ used for the synthesis was obtained according to the method reported by Richardson et al., (2002). The K₂[ReCl₆] was obtained as published previously (Enk, 1931). The potassium hexachloridorhenate was mixed with C₁₂H₁₀N₄O₂ and acetic acid (molar ratio 1:1:3, respectively) and refluxed in water for 3 h at about 100 °C. The mixture was allowed to evaporate in air to give brown plate crystals.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top

	Fig. 1. The crystal structure of (C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆] salt with labelling atoms in the asymmetric part of the unit cell. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 20% probability level. The aromatic rings of minor-occupancy pyridyl component are drawn by thin lines.
	Fig. 2. Packing diagram showing a layer architecture in the crystal structure of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 20% probability level. The aromatic rings of minor-occupancy component are omitted for clarity.
	Fig. 3. Ribbons of adjacent cations extending along [-111] direction which interact with [ReCl₆]^2- ions via O—H···Cl, N—H···Cl and C—H···Cl hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen atoms not involved in interactions are omitted for clarity. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 20% probability level. The aromatic rings of minor-occupancy component are omitted for clarity.
	Fig. 4. Packing diagram viewed down the c-axis showing π···π stacking interactions between the adjacent cations. The aromatic rings of minor-occupancy component are omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: (v) 1–x, 1 - y, 1 - z; (vi) -x + 1, -y + 2, -z + 1; (vii) –x, -y + 2, -z + 1; (viii) x + 1, y - 1, z; (ix) x + 1, y, z.

2,2'-[(1E,2E)-1,2-Bis(hydroxyimino)ethane-1,2-diyl]dipyridinium hexachloridorhenate(IV) top

Crystal data top

(C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆]	Z = 1
M_r = 643.16	F(000) = 305
Triclinic, P1	D_x = 2.227 Mg m⁻³
Hall symbol: -P 1	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.836 (3) Å	Cell parameters from 10732 reflections
b = 8.051 (3) Å	θ = 2.8–38.5°
c = 8.733 (3) Å	µ = 7.18 mm⁻¹
α = 85.44 (3)°	T = 100 K
β = 73.85 (3)°	Plate, brown
γ = 65.12 (4)°	0.15 × 0.06 × 0.02 mm
V = 479.6 (3) Å³

Data collection top

Agilent Xcalibur PX KM-4-CCD diffractometer	4738 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	4464 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.026
ϕ and ω scans	θ_max = 38.5°, θ_min = 2.8°
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)	h = −13→13
T_min = 0.439, T_max = 0.841	k = −14→14
9670 measured reflections	l = −15→12

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.025	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F²) = 0.039	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.012P)²] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
4738 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
126 parameters	Δρ_max = 1.41 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Δρ_min = −1.02 e Å⁻³

Crystal data top

(C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆]	γ = 65.12 (4)°
M_r = 643.16	V = 479.6 (3) Å³
Triclinic, P1	Z = 1
a = 7.836 (3) Å	Mo Kα radiation
b = 8.051 (3) Å	µ = 7.18 mm⁻¹
c = 8.733 (3) Å	T = 100 K
α = 85.44 (3)°	0.15 × 0.06 × 0.02 mm
β = 73.85 (3)°

Data collection top

Agilent Xcalibur PX KM-4-CCD diffractometer	4738 independent reflections
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)	4464 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
T_min = 0.439, T_max = 0.841	R_int = 0.026
9670 measured reflections

Refinement top

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.025	0 restraints
wR(F²) = 0.039	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02	Δρ_max = 1.41 e Å⁻³
4738 reflections	Δρ_min = −1.02 e Å⁻³
126 parameters

Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > σ(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq	Occ. (<1)
Re	0.0000	0.5000	0.0000	0.01565 (3)
Cl1	0.08601 (6)	0.50992 (6)	−0.27962 (5)	0.01953 (8)
Cl2	−0.21489 (7)	0.36685 (6)	−0.01114 (5)	0.02267 (9)
Cl3	0.25414 (7)	0.20532 (6)	−0.01585 (5)	0.02528 (10)
O1	0.5915 (2)	0.64822 (17)	0.74131 (15)	0.0205 (3)
H1	0.6525	0.6038	0.8106	0.031*
N1	0.6027 (2)	0.5076 (2)	0.65197 (18)	0.0178 (3)
C1	0.4972 (2)	0.5685 (2)	0.55275 (19)	0.0151 (3)
C11	0.3742 (6)	0.7650 (4)	0.5391 (5)	0.0171 (3)	0.786 (7)
N12	0.2411 (4)	0.8555 (4)	0.6748 (3)	0.0190 (4)	0.786 (7)
H12	0.2360	0.7952	0.7633	0.023*	0.786 (7)
C13	0.1165 (4)	1.0326 (4)	0.6810 (4)	0.0283 (7)	0.786 (7)
H13	0.0257	1.0908	0.7789	0.034*	0.786 (7)
C14	0.1219 (5)	1.1290 (3)	0.5432 (4)	0.0297 (8)	0.786 (7)
H14	0.0345	1.2543	0.5449	0.036*	0.786 (7)
C15	0.2549 (5)	1.0417 (4)	0.4039 (4)	0.0285 (8)	0.786 (7)
H15	0.2595	1.1070	0.3084	0.034*	0.786 (7)
C16	0.3830 (6)	0.8590 (5)	0.4009 (4)	0.0217 (6)	0.786 (7)
H16	0.4761	0.7994	0.3042	0.026*	0.786 (7)
C31	0.377 (2)	0.7638 (9)	0.5356 (14)	0.0171 (3)	0.214 (7)
N32	0.4339 (15)	0.8257 (9)	0.3851 (11)	0.0217 (6)	0.214 (7)
H32	0.5283	0.7485	0.3097	0.026*	0.214 (7)
C33	0.3418 (12)	1.0095 (10)	0.3537 (8)	0.0182 (19)*	0.214 (7)
H33	0.3809	1.0518	0.2509	0.022*	0.214 (7)
C34	0.1926 (11)	1.1314 (7)	0.4728 (10)	0.0153 (18)*	0.214 (7)
H34	0.1297	1.2570	0.4514	0.018*	0.214 (7)
C35	0.1355 (11)	1.0695 (11)	0.6233 (9)	0.0157 (19)*	0.214 (7)
H35	0.0335	1.1528	0.7047	0.019*	0.214 (7)
C36	0.2275 (18)	0.8857 (13)	0.6547 (10)	0.0190 (4)	0.214 (7)
H36	0.1884	0.8434	0.7576	0.023*	0.214 (7)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Re	0.01360 (4)	0.02072 (5)	0.01234 (5)	−0.00645 (3)	−0.00438 (3)	0.00154 (3)
Cl1	0.02003 (19)	0.0271 (2)	0.01245 (18)	−0.01074 (16)	−0.00483 (15)	0.00221 (15)
Cl2	0.0230 (2)	0.0342 (2)	0.0169 (2)	−0.01699 (18)	−0.00705 (16)	0.00295 (16)
Cl3	0.0234 (2)	0.0247 (2)	0.0201 (2)	−0.00156 (17)	−0.00808 (17)	0.00118 (16)
O1	0.0239 (6)	0.0236 (6)	0.0188 (6)	−0.0106 (5)	−0.0120 (5)	0.0014 (5)
N1	0.0173 (7)	0.0194 (7)	0.0177 (7)	−0.0074 (5)	−0.0066 (5)	0.0018 (5)
C1	0.0135 (7)	0.0167 (7)	0.0148 (7)	−0.0067 (6)	−0.0033 (6)	0.0029 (6)
C11	0.0195 (8)	0.0175 (8)	0.0181 (8)	−0.0085 (6)	−0.0102 (6)	0.0026 (6)
N12	0.0214 (9)	0.0172 (11)	0.0181 (10)	−0.0045 (8)	−0.0108 (7)	0.0016 (7)
C13	0.0334 (14)	0.0195 (12)	0.0331 (17)	−0.0047 (10)	−0.0195 (12)	−0.0023 (11)
C14	0.0407 (18)	0.0164 (11)	0.0398 (19)	−0.0098 (10)	−0.0273 (16)	0.0049 (10)
C15	0.042 (2)	0.0273 (14)	0.0336 (17)	−0.0230 (14)	−0.0261 (16)	0.0176 (13)
C16	0.0285 (18)	0.0218 (13)	0.0174 (11)	−0.0124 (12)	−0.0083 (12)	0.0053 (9)
C31	0.0195 (8)	0.0175 (8)	0.0181 (8)	−0.0085 (6)	−0.0102 (6)	0.0026 (6)
N32	0.0285 (18)	0.0218 (13)	0.0174 (11)	−0.0124 (12)	−0.0083 (12)	0.0053 (9)
C36	0.0214 (9)	0.0172 (11)	0.0181 (10)	−0.0045 (8)	−0.0108 (7)	0.0016 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Re—Cl1	2.3500 (10)	C14—H14	0.9500
Re—Cl2	2.3707 (9)	C15—C16	1.386 (4)
Re—Cl3	2.3531 (15)	C15—H15	0.9500
O1—N1	1.3844 (19)	C16—H16	0.9500
O1—H1	0.8400	C31—N32	1.3900
N1—C1	1.290 (2)	C31—C36	1.3900
C1—C1ⁱ	1.472 (3)	N32—C33	1.3900
C1—C11	1.482 (3)	N32—H32	0.8800
C1—C31	1.476 (6)	C33—C34	1.3900
C11—N12	1.354 (3)	C33—H33	0.9500
C11—C16	1.374 (3)	C34—C35	1.3900
N12—C13	1.342 (3)	C34—H34	0.9500
N12—H12	0.8800	C35—C36	1.3900
C13—C14	1.379 (4)	C35—H35	0.9500
C13—H13	0.9500	C36—H36	0.9500
C14—C15	1.369 (4)

Cl1—Re—Cl3	90.35 (4)	C13—N12—C11	123.2 (2)
Cl1—Re—Cl2	90.11 (3)	N12—C13—C14	119.1 (3)
Cl3—Re—Cl2	89.72 (4)	C15—C14—C13	119.1 (2)
N1—O1—H1	109.5	C14—C15—C16	120.6 (2)
C1—N1—O1	111.88 (14)	C11—C16—C15	119.4 (3)
N1—C1—C1ⁱ	116.75 (18)	N32—C31—C36	120.0
N1—C1—C11	124.1 (2)	N32—C31—C1	113.3 (6)
C1ⁱ—C1—C11	119.1 (3)	C36—C31—C1	126.6 (7)
N1—C1—C31	124.8 (7)	C31—N32—C33	120.0
C1ⁱ—C1—C31	118.4 (7)	C34—C33—N32	120.0
N12—C11—C16	118.5 (2)	C35—C34—C33	120.0
N12—C11—C1	116.2 (3)	C34—C35—C36	120.0
C16—C11—C1	125.3 (3)	C35—C36—C31	120.0

O1—N1—C1—C1ⁱ	178.00 (16)	C1—C11—C16—C15	178.0 (4)
O1—N1—C1—C11	−1.6 (3)	N1—C1—C31—N32	118.0 (6)
O1—N1—C1—C31	−0.5 (6)	C1ⁱ—C1—C31—N32	−60.4 (9)
N1—C1—C11—N12	−55.6 (4)	N1—C1—C31—C36	−57.8 (11)
C1ⁱ—C1—C11—N12	124.8 (3)	C1ⁱ—C1—C31—C36	123.7 (7)
N1—C1—C11—C16	125.6 (3)	C1—C31—N32—C33	−176.1 (13)
C1ⁱ—C1—C11—C16	−54.0 (5)	C1—C31—C36—C35	175.6 (15)
C1—C11—N12—C13	−178.6 (4)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
O1—H1···Cl2ⁱⁱ	0.84	2.43	3.2034 (19)	154
N12—H12···Cl2ⁱⁱⁱ	0.88	2.44	3.318 (3)	179
N32—H32···Cl3^iv	0.88	2.75	3.416 (9)	133
N32—H32···Cl1^iv	0.88	2.81	3.495 (8)	136
C13—H13···Cl2^v	0.95	2.66	3.550 (4)	157
C16—H16···Cl3^iv	0.95	2.79	3.658 (4)	152
C36—H36···Cl2ⁱⁱⁱ	0.95	2.68	3.581 (7)	159

Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1, y, z+1; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (v) x, y+1, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	(C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆]
M_r	643.16
Crystal system, space group	Triclinic, P1
Temperature (K)	100
a, b, c (Å)	7.836 (3), 8.051 (3), 8.733 (3)
α, β, γ (°)	85.44 (3), 73.85 (3), 65.12 (4)
V (Å³)	479.6 (3)
Z	1
Radiation type	Mo Kα
µ (mm⁻¹)	7.18
Crystal size (mm)	0.15 × 0.06 × 0.02

Data collection
Diffractometer	Agilent Xcalibur PX KM-4-CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction	Analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)
T_min, T_max	0.439, 0.841
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	9670, 4738, 4464
R_int	0.026
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.877

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.025, 0.039, 1.02
No. of reflections	4738
No. of parameters	126
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	1.41, −1.02

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006), publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
O1—H1···Cl2ⁱ	0.84	2.43	3.2034 (19)	154
N12—H12···Cl2ⁱⁱ	0.88	2.44	3.318 (3)	179
N32—H32···Cl3ⁱⁱⁱ	0.88	2.75	3.416 (9)	133
N32—H32···Cl1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.88	2.81	3.495 (8)	136
C13—H13···Cl2^iv	0.95	2.66	3.550 (4)	157
C16—H16···Cl3ⁱⁱⁱ	0.95	2.79	3.658 (4)	152
C36—H36···Cl2ⁱⁱ	0.95	2.68	3.581 (7)	159

Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z+1; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (iv) x, y+1, z+1.

Selected interatomic distances (Å) and angles (°) for (C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆] and C₁₂H₁₀N₄O₂ (see also Sabaté & Delalu, 2012). top

(C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂)[ReCl₆]		C₁₂H₁₀N₄O₂
C1—C1^v	1.472 (3)	C7—C7ⁱⁱ	1.468 (3)
C1—C11	1.482 (3)	C7—C2	1.501 (2)
C1—N1	1.290 (2)	C7—N8	1.289 (2)
N1—O1	1.3844 (19)	N8—O9	1.392 (2)
C1—N1—O1	111.88 (14)	C7—N8—O9	112.6 (1)
C1^v—C1—N1	116.75 (18)	C7ⁱⁱ—C7—N8	116.0 (2)
C11—C1—C1^v	119.1 (3)	C2—C7—C7ⁱⁱ	119.5 (1)
Re—Cl1	2.3500 (10)
Re—Cl2	2.3707 (9)
Re—Cl3	2.3531 (15)

Notes: Symmetry codes: (ii) -x, 1-y, 1-z; (v) 1-x, 1-y, 1-z.

References

Agilent (2011). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies, Yarnton, England. Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Enk, E. (1931). Ber. Dtsch Chem.. Ges.. 64 791-797. CrossRef Google Scholar
Hołyńska, M., Korabik, M. & Lis, T. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, m2859. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Janiak, C. (2000). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 3885–3896. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Jurisson, S., Francesconi, L., Linder, K. E., Treher, E., Malley, M. F., Gougoutas, J. Z. & Nunn, A. D. (1991). Inorg. Chem. 30, 1820–1827. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Jurisson, S., Halihan, M. M., Lydon, J. D., Barnes, C. L., Nowotnik, D. P. & Nunn, A. D. (1998). Inorg. Chem. 37, 1922–1928. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Richardson, C. & Steel, P. J. (2000). Aust. J. Chem. 53, 93–97. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Richardson, C., Steel, P. J., D'Alessandro, D. M. D., Junk, P. C. & Keene, F. R. (2002). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 2775–2785. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Sabaté, C. M. & Delalu, H. (2012). Heteroat. Chem. 23, 59–65. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Soules, D., Holland, W. J. & Stupavsky, S. (1970). Microchim. Acta, 58, 787–792. CrossRef Google Scholar
Takazawa, H., Ohba, S., Saito, Y. & Sano, M. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 166–174. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.