3-Methyl­ideneoxolane-2,5-dione

Beginn, U.; Frosinn, M.; Reichelt, M.; Reuter, H.

doi:10.1107/S1600536813002924

organic compounds

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 69| Part 3| March 2013| Page o321

doi:10.1107/S1600536813002924

Open

access

3-Methylideneoxolane-2,5-dione

Uwe Beginn,^a Martin Frosinn,^a Martin Reichelt ^b and Hans Reuter ^b ^*

^aInstitut für Chemie neuer Materialien, Organische Materialchemie, Universität Osnabrück, Barbarastrasse 7, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany, and ^bInstitut für Chemie neuer Materialien, Strukturchemie, Universität Osnabrück, Barbarastrasse 7, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany
^*Correspondence e-mail: hreuter@uos.de

(Received 23 January 2013; accepted 29 January 2013; online 2 February 2013)

The title compound (itaconic anhydride), C₅H₄O₃, consists of a five-membered carbon–oxygen ring in a flat envelope conformation (the unsubstituted C atom being the flap) with three exocyclic double bonds to two O atoms and one C atom. In contrast to the bond lengths, which are very similar to those in itaconic acid in its pure form or in adducts with other molecules, the bond angles differ significantly because of the effect of ring closure giving rise to strong distortions at the C atoms involved in the exocyclic double bonds. In the crystal, C—H⋯O interactions link the molecules, forming an extended three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For the structure of the pure acid, see: Harlow & Pfluger (1973 ) and for the structure of the acid in combination with 2,2′-dipyridyl-N,N′-dioxide or urea, see: Smith et al. (1997 ); Baures et al. (2000 ). For the structure of succinic anhydride, see: Ferretti et al. (2002). For the preparation of the anhydride, see: Choudhary (2004 ); Kempf (1909 ) and for its polymerization, see: Otsu & Yang (1991 ).

Experimental

Crystal data

C₅H₄O₃
M_r = 112.08
Orthorhombic, P 2₁ 2₁ 2₁
a = 5.4854 (3) Å
b = 7.3498 (5) Å
c = 12.1871 (7) Å
V = 491.34 (5) Å³
Z = 4
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 0.13 mm⁻¹
T = 100 K
0.27 × 0.09 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009 ) T_min = 0.966, T_max = 0.991
18134 measured reflections
716 independent reflections
639 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R_int = 0.037

Refinement

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.026
wR(F²) = 0.065
S = 1.10
716 reflections
74 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max = 0.24 e Å⁻³
Δρ_min = −0.14 e Å⁻³

Table 1
Selected bond angles (°)

C2—O1—C5	110.65 (11)
O1—C2—O2	119.98 (13)
O2—C2—C3	131.52 (14)
O1—C2—C3	108.49 (12)
C2—C3—C6	122.35 (13)
C4—C3—C6	130.45 (14)
C2—C3—C4	107.19 (13)
C3—C4—C5	103.29 (13)
O1—C5—O5	120.01 (14)
O5—C5—C4	129.68 (15)
O1—C5—C4	110.31 (12)

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
C6—H6A⋯O5ⁱ	0.95	2.73	3.645 (2)	162
C6—H6B⋯O5ⁱⁱ	0.95	2.48	3.369 (2)	155
C4—H4B⋯O2ⁱⁱⁱ	0.99	2.57	3.433 (2)	146
C4—H4A⋯O2^iv	0.99	2.71	3.181 (2)	109
Symmetry codes: (i) $[-x+{\script{3\over 2}}, -y+2, z-{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (ii) $[-x+1, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{3\over 2}}]$ ; (iii) $[-x+{\script{3\over 2}}, -y+2, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (iv) $[x-{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, -z+1]$ .

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813002924/gg2110sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813002924/gg2110Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813002924/gg2110Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Comment top

3-Methylenedihydrofuran-2,5-dione represents the anhydride of 3-methylendihydrufuran-2,5-carbonic with the trivial name itaconic acid. From this, the trivial name itaconic anhydride of the title compound is derived. Itaconic anhydride was synthesized for research projects on its polymerization to a homo-polymer (Otsu & Yang, 1991) or together with other monomers with special focus on the properties of the resulting products and the reactions of the anhydride function of the polymers with other substances. Due to the problems (hydration, decay, isomerization) that occur if itaconic anhydride is stored a longer time or under wrong conditions and to ensure its purity, the anhydride was directly synthesized from the itaconic acid and purified before polymerization.

The asymmetric unit of the title compound consists of one molecule (Fig. 1) with all atoms in general positions. Because of its three exocyclic double bonds (2 x C=O of 1.193 (2), respectively 1.194 (2) Å, 1 x C=C of 1.319 (2) Å) the backbone of the molecule is very rigid but as a result of its low symmetry not exactly planar. Deviation [O1 = 0.005 (1) Å, C2 = -0.005 (1) Å, C3 = 0.003 (1) Å, C5 = -0.003 (1) Å; flap atom: C4 = 0.035 (2) Å; exocyclic atoms: O2 = -0.024 (2) Å, O5 = -0.035 (3) Å, C6 = -0.035 (3) Å] from planarity is best described using a least-square plane through the atoms of the five-membered carbon-oxygen ring with exception of the carbon atom of the methylene group. The resulting very flat envelop conformation is defined by an angle of 2.2 (2)° between this least-squares plane and the plane formed by the flap. The C—C bonds that the methylene carbon atom is involved in are somewhat shortened [d(C4—C3) = 1.499 (2) Å, d(C4—C5) = 1.502 (2) Å] but longer than the C—C bond [d(C2—C3) = 1.479 (2) Å] between the two sp² hybridized carbon atoms of the ring. All in all, bond lengths are very similar to those of the acid in its pure state (Harlow & Pfluger, 1973) or in adducts with other molecules like 2,2'-dipyridyl-N,N'-dioxide (Smith et al., 1997) or urea (Baures et al. 2000).

Bond angles within the ring vary between 103.3 (1)° at C4 to 110.7 (1)° at O1 indicating small differences to the angles within a regular pentagon (108°). With respect to the carbon atoms C2, C3 and C5 that are involved in an exocyclic double bond to oxygen, respectively carbon this endocyclic bond angles are very unfavorable because they prefer bond angles of 120°. As a consequence, one of the two exocyclic bond angles at these atoms is widened [O5—C5—C4 = 129.7 (1)°, C6—C3—C4 = 130.5 (1)°, O2—C2—C3 = 131.5 (1)°] whereas the other one is in the normal range [O5—C5—O1 = 120.0 (1)°, C6—C3—C2 = 122.4 (1)°, O2—C2—O1 = 120.0 (1)°].

Without the possibility of forming classical (O—H···O) bonds and in the absence of a π-ring system for π-π-interactions, intermolecular interactions are restricted to van der Waals ones (Fig. 2), dominated by C—H ···O distances from 2.48 to 2.73 Å (Fig. 3, Tab. 1). It is worthwhile to notice that succinic anhydride that differs from itaconic anhydride by replacing the exocyclic C=CH₂ fragment by a second methylene group crystallizes in the same chiral orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁ with similar dimensions of the unit cell. Within its solid state structure Ferretti et al. (2002) have identified as a key feature of the crystal packing the interaction of the negatively charged carbonyl oxygen atoms with the ring atoms of two neighbouring molecules. This structure motif is also present in solid state structure of itaconic anhydride (Fig. 5) with O···C contacts in the range of 3.083 (2) to 3.419 (2) Å and O···O contacts of 3.097 (2) Å, respectively 3.389 (2) Å.

Related literature top

For the structure of the pure acid, see: Harlow & Pfluger (1973) and for the structure of the acid in combination with 2,2'-dipyridyl-N,N'-dioxide or urea, see: Smith et al. (1997); Baures et al. (2000). For the structure of succinic anhydride, see: Ferretti et al. (2002). For the preparation of the anhydride, see: Choudhary (2004); Kempf (1909) and for its polymerization, see: Otsu & Yang (1991).

Experimental top

Synthesis:

The synthesis of itaconic anhydride was performed according to a procedure from Choudhary (2004), which is in close analogy to the preparation of succinic anhydride from succinic acid (Kempf, 1909). 12.4 g (95.3 mmol) itaconic acid (Aldrich) are dissolved in 100 ml of dry chloroform (Riedel). To the solution slowly under vigorous stirring 10.0 g (70.4 mmol) of phosphorus pentoxide (Aldrich) are added. Subsequently the reaction mixture is heated to 74 °C for 24 h under reflux. The reaction mixture is filtered and the filtrate is placed in an ice bath until the product (white crystals) precipitated. The precipitate is filtered off and recrystallized from 50 ml dry CHCl₃. The yield is 6.9 g (60%).

Spectroscopic studies:

Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C₅H₄O₃: C, 53.58; H, 3.6. Found: C, 52.72; H, 3.84. Melting point (DSC): 66.9 °C. ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, p.p.m.): 6.567(t), 5.936 (t), 3.633(t). ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, p.p.m.): 167.64 (s), 164.42 (s), 130.37 (s), 126.48 (s), 33.58 (s). IR (ATR, cm^-1): 2944.78, 1843.28, 1763.01, 1697.17, 1668.89, 1437.45, 1408.03, 1384.81, 1311.18, 1274.61, 1227.05, 1167.98, 1004.77, 971.12, 927.72, 902.70, 830.47, 807.14, 783.53, 727.02, 641.88, 583.14, 532.17.

Crystallographic studies:

A suitable single-crystal was selected under a polarization microsope and mounted on a 50 µm MicroMesh MiTeGen Micromount^TM using FROMBLIN Y perfluoropolyether (LVAC 16/6, Aldrich).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top

	Fig. 1. Ball-and-stick model of the title compound with the atomic numbering scheme used; with exception of the hydrogen atoms, which are shown as spheres with a common isotropic radius, all other atoms are represented as thermal displacement ellipsoids showing the 50% probability level of the corresponding atom.
	Fig. 2. Ball-and-stick model of the title compound showing the flat envelope conformation of the five-membered ring; least-squares plane through the four atoms C5—O1—C2—C3 in red, plane through the atoms C3—C4—C5 of the flap in green.
	Fig. 3. Perspective view of the crystal structure parallel to the crystallographic a axis.
	Fig. 4. Ball-and-stick model of the most prominent C—H···O interactions (grey) of an itaconic anhydride molecule with six other surrounding molecules; with exception of the hydrogen atoms, which are shown as spheres with common isotropic radius, all other atoms are represented as thermal displacement ellipsoids showing the 50% probability level of the corresponding atom. [Symmetry codes: (1) 1 - x, -1/2 + y, 3/2 + z; (2) -1/2 + x, 3/2 - y, 1 - z; (3) 3/2 - x, 2 - y, -1/2 + z; (4) 1 - x, 1/2 + y, 3/2 - z; (5) 3/2 - x, 2 - y, 1/2 + z]
	Fig. 5. Ball-and-stick model (a) and space-filling model (b) of the interaction (dashed stick, grey) of the carbonyl oxygen atoms with the ring atoms of neighbouring molecules; with exception of the hydrogen atoms, which are shown as spheres with common isotropic radius, all other atoms are represented as thermal displacement ellipsoids showing the 50% probability level of the corresponding atom; distances: d(O5···O1²) = 3.097 (2) Å, d(O5···C2²) = 3.083 (2) Å, d(O5···C3²) = 3.131 (2) Å, d(O5···C4²) = 3.173 (2) Å, d(O5···C5²) = 3.165 (2) Å; d(O2···O1¹) = 3.389 (2) Å, d(O2···C5¹) = 3.210 (2) Å, d(O2···C4¹) = 3.181 (2) Å, d(O2···C3¹) = 3.277 (2) Å, d(O2··· C2¹) = 3.419 (2) Å. [Symmetry codes: (1) 1/2 + x, 3/2 - y, 1 - z; (2) 2 - x, -1/2 + y, 3/2 - z]

3-Methylideneoxolane-2,5-dione top

Crystal data top

C₅H₄O₃	D_x = 1.515 Mg m⁻³
M_r = 112.08	Melting point: 340.05 K
Orthorhombic, P2₁2₁2₁	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab	Cell parameters from 6479 reflections
a = 5.4854 (3) Å	θ = 3.2–27.0°
b = 7.3498 (5) Å	µ = 0.13 mm⁻¹
c = 12.1871 (7) Å	T = 100 K
V = 491.34 (5) Å³	Needle, colourless
Z = 4	0.27 × 0.09 × 0.07 mm
F(000) = 232

Data collection top

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer	716 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	639 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.037
ϕ and ω scans	θ_max = 28.0°, θ_min = 3.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)	h = −7→7
T_min = 0.966, T_max = 0.991	k = −9→9
18134 measured reflections	l = −16→16

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.026	H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F²) = 0.065	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0343P)² + 0.0728P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
S = 1.10	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
716 reflections	Δρ_max = 0.24 e Å⁻³
74 parameters	Δρ_min = −0.14 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc^*=kFc[1+0.001xFc²λ³/sin(2θ)]^-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods	Extinction coefficient: 0.037 (9)

Crystal data top

C₅H₄O₃	V = 491.34 (5) Å³
M_r = 112.08	Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P2₁2₁2₁	Mo Kα radiation
a = 5.4854 (3) Å	µ = 0.13 mm⁻¹
b = 7.3498 (5) Å	T = 100 K
c = 12.1871 (7) Å	0.27 × 0.09 × 0.07 mm

Data collection top

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer	716 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)	639 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
T_min = 0.966, T_max = 0.991	R_int = 0.037
18134 measured reflections

Refinement top

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.026	0 restraints
wR(F²) = 0.065	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10	Δρ_max = 0.24 e Å⁻³
716 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.14 e Å⁻³
74 parameters

Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > σ(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
O1	1.00411 (19)	0.79021 (13)	0.61376 (8)	0.0188 (3)
C2	0.8967 (3)	0.9113 (2)	0.54015 (12)	0.0163 (3)
O2	0.99390 (19)	0.94361 (14)	0.45473 (8)	0.0224 (3)
C3	0.6656 (3)	0.9775 (2)	0.58826 (12)	0.0154 (3)
C4	0.6393 (3)	0.8894 (2)	0.69856 (12)	0.0173 (3)
H4A	0.4873	0.8171	0.7028	0.021*
H4B	0.6390	0.9814	0.7579	0.021*
C5	0.8600 (3)	0.7691 (2)	0.70585 (12)	0.0194 (3)
O5	0.9200 (2)	0.66606 (17)	0.77659 (9)	0.0299 (3)
C6	0.5202 (3)	1.0912 (2)	0.53599 (12)	0.0203 (3)
H6A	0.5626	1.1335	0.4648	0.024*
H6B	0.3731	1.1309	0.5695	0.024*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
O1	0.0164 (5)	0.0215 (5)	0.0185 (5)	0.0036 (5)	0.0003 (5)	−0.0016 (4)
C2	0.0165 (7)	0.0155 (7)	0.0168 (7)	−0.0018 (6)	−0.0029 (6)	−0.0029 (6)
O2	0.0215 (6)	0.0279 (6)	0.0176 (5)	−0.0033 (5)	0.0038 (6)	−0.0018 (4)
C3	0.0143 (7)	0.0157 (7)	0.0163 (6)	−0.0021 (6)	−0.0004 (6)	−0.0040 (6)
C4	0.0172 (7)	0.0176 (7)	0.0171 (6)	0.0001 (6)	0.0005 (6)	−0.0006 (6)
C5	0.0206 (8)	0.0212 (8)	0.0166 (7)	0.0006 (7)	−0.0012 (7)	−0.0036 (6)
O5	0.0335 (7)	0.0330 (7)	0.0231 (6)	0.0123 (6)	−0.0013 (5)	0.0077 (5)
C6	0.0177 (7)	0.0187 (7)	0.0245 (7)	−0.0005 (7)	−0.0009 (7)	0.0011 (6)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

O1—C5	1.382 (2)	C4—C5	1.502 (2)
O1—C2	1.394 (2)	C4—H4A	0.9900
C2—O2	1.193 (2)	C4—H4B	0.9900
C2—C3	1.479 (2)	C5—O5	1.194 (2)
C3—C6	1.319 (2)	C6—H6A	0.9500
C3—C4	1.499 (2)	C6—H6B	0.9500

C2—O1—C5	110.65 (11)	O1—C5—C4	110.31 (12)
O1—C2—O2	119.98 (13)	C3—C4—H4A	111.1
O2—C2—C3	131.52 (14)	C5—C4—H4A	111.1
O1—C2—C3	108.49 (12)	C3—C4—H4B	111.1
C2—C3—C6	122.35 (13)	C5—C4—H4B	111.1
C4—C3—C6	130.45 (14)	H4A—C4—H4B	109.1
C2—C3—C4	107.19 (13)	C3—C6—H6A	120.0
C3—C4—C5	103.29 (13)	C3—C6—H6B	120.0
O1—C5—O5	120.01 (14)	H6A—C6—H6B	120.0
O5—C5—C4	129.68 (15)

O1—C2—C3—C4	0.65 (15)	C4—C5—O1—C2	−2.28 (16)
C2—C3—C4—C5	−1.86 (15)	C5—O1—C2—C3	1.00 (15)
C3—C4—C5—O1	2.54 (16)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C6—H6A···O5ⁱ	0.95	2.73	3.645 (2)	162
C6—H6B···O5ⁱⁱ	0.95	2.48	3.369 (2)	155
C4—H4B···O2ⁱⁱⁱ	0.99	2.57	3.433 (2)	146
C4—H4A···O2^iv	0.99	2.71	3.181 (2)	109

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, −y+2, z−1/2; (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (iii) −x+3/2, −y+2, z+1/2; (iv) x−1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₅H₄O₃
M_r	112.08
Crystal system, space group	Orthorhombic, P2₁2₁2₁
Temperature (K)	100
a, b, c (Å)	5.4854 (3), 7.3498 (5), 12.1871 (7)
V (Å³)	491.34 (5)
Z	4
Radiation type	Mo Kα
µ (mm⁻¹)	0.13
Crystal size (mm)	0.27 × 0.09 × 0.07

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)
T_min, T_max	0.966, 0.991
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	18134, 716, 639
R_int	0.037
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.660

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.026, 0.065, 1.10
No. of reflections	716
No. of parameters	74
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.24, −0.14

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009), SAINT (Bruker, 2009), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Selected bond angles (º) top

C2—O1—C5	110.65 (11)	C2—C3—C4	107.19 (13)
O1—C2—O2	119.98 (13)	C3—C4—C5	103.29 (13)
O2—C2—C3	131.52 (14)	O1—C5—O5	120.01 (14)
O1—C2—C3	108.49 (12)	O5—C5—C4	129.68 (15)
C2—C3—C6	122.35 (13)	O1—C5—C4	110.31 (12)
C4—C3—C6	130.45 (14)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C6—H6A···O5ⁱ	0.95	2.73	3.645 (2)	162
C6—H6B···O5ⁱⁱ	0.95	2.48	3.369 (2)	155
C4—H4B···O2ⁱⁱⁱ	0.99	2.57	3.433 (2)	146
C4—H4A···O2^iv	0.99	2.71	3.181 (2)	109

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, −y+2, z−1/2; (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (iii) −x+3/2, −y+2, z+1/2; (iv) x−1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1.

Acknowledgements

We thanks the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Government of Lower Saxony for their financial support in the acquisition of the diffractometer.

References

Baures, P. W., Wiznycia, A. & Beatty, A. M. (2000). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 8, 1599–1605. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruker (2009). APEX2, SADABS and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Choudhary, V. (2004). private communication. Google Scholar
Ferretti, V., Gilli, P. & Gavezzotti, A. (2002). Chem. Eur. J. 8, 1710–1718. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Harlow, R. L. & Pfluger, C. E. (1973). Acta Cryst. B29, 2965–2966. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Kempf, R. (1909). J. Prakt. Chem. (Leipzig), 78, 201–259. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Otsu, T. & Yang, J.-Z. (1991). Polym. Int. 25, 245–251. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Smith, G., Kennard, C. H. L. & Byriel, K. A. (1997). Aust. J. Chem. 50, 1021–1026. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar