Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 69| Part 3| March 2013| Pages o346-o347
doi:10.1107/S1600536813003012

Benzylammonium hepta­noate–hepta­noic acid (1/1)

Mary H. Wooda and Stuart M. Clarkea*

aBP Institute and Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, England
*Correspondence e-mail: stuart@bpi.cam.ac.uk

(Received 10 December 2012; accepted 29 January 2013; online 6 February 2013)

The title salt, C7H10N+·C7H13O2−·C7H14O2, is an unusual 2:1 stoichiometric combination of two carb­oxy­lic acid mol­ecules and one amine. Although there are crystal structures of a number of 1:1 complexes reported in the literature, 2:1 acid amine complexes are rather uncommon. In this case, a proton is transferred between one acid mol­ecule and the amine to give an acid anion and an ammonium cation whilst the other carb­oxy­lic acid remains protonated. The species inter­act strongly via electrostatic forces and hydrogen bonds. In addition we note that the N atom of the ammonium group makes four close contacts to surrounding O atoms. Three of these are hydrogen bonds with neighbouring acid anions while the fourth does not involve a hydrogen atom but is directed towards the carbonyl O atom of the protonated acid. Each of the acid anion O atoms accepts two hydrogen bonds from adjacent N atoms. There is also evidence of short C—H⋯O contacts. There is disorder (occupancy ratio 0.51:0.49) in the alkyl chain of one of the carb­oxy­lic acid mol­ecules.

Related literature

For spectroscopic studies of acid–amine complexes, see: Karlsson et al. (2000[Karlsson, S., Backlund, S. & Friman, R. (2000). Colloid Polym. Sci. 278, 8-14.]); Kohler et al. (1981[Kohler, F., Atrops, H., Kalali, H., Liebermann, E., Wilhelm, E., Ratkovics, F. & Salamon, T. (1981). J. Phys. Chem. 85, 2520-2524.]); Smith et al. (2001[Smith, G., Wermuth, U. D., Bott, R. C., White, J. M. & Willis, A. C. (2001). Aust. J. Chem. 54, 165-170.], 2002[Smith, G., Wermuth, U. D., Bott, R. C., Healy, P. C. & White, J. M. (2002). Aust. J. Chem. 55, 349-356.]); Klokkenburg et al. (2007[Klokkenburg, M., Hilhorst, J. & Erne, B. H. (2007). Vib. Spectrosc. 43, 243-248.]). For recent diffraction studies of acid–amine complexes, see: Jefferson et al. (2011[Jefferson, A. E., Sun, C., Bond, A. D. & Clarke, S. M. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o655.]); Sun et al. (2011[Sun, S., Bojdys, M. J., Clarke, S. M., Harper, L. D., Castro, M. A. & Medina, S. (2011). Langmuir, 27, 3626-3637.]); Wood & Clarke (2012a[Wood, M. H. & Clarke, S. M. (2012a). Acta Cryst. E68, o3004.],b[Wood, M. H. & Clarke, S. M. (2012b). Acta Cryst. E68, o3335.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C7H10N+·C7H13O2−·C7H14O2

  • Mr = 367.52

  • Monoclinic, C 2/c

  • a = 25.5516 (5) Å

  • b = 6.3250 (1) Å

  • c = 27.9899 (6) Å

  • β = 90.639 (1)°

  • V = 4523.27 (15) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.07 mm−1

  • T = 180 K

  • 0.23 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
Data collection

  • Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995[Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33-38.]) Tmin = 0.910, Tmax = 1.000

  • 22723 measured reflections

  • 5085 independent reflections

  • 2353 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.060
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.068

  • wR(F2) = 0.238

  • S = 0.98

  • 5085 reflections

  • 232 parameters

  • 10 restraints

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i 0.91 1.87 2.773 (3) 171
N1—H1B⋯O2ii 0.91 1.96 2.823 (3) 158
N1—H1C⋯O2 0.91 1.90 2.781 (3) 164
O3—H3⋯O1 0.84 1.78 2.610 (3) 172
C1—H1D⋯O4iii 0.99 2.60 3.542 (4) 160
C3—H3A⋯O2i 0.95 2.59 3.456 (4) 152
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) [-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z]; (iii) [-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z].

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998[Nonius, B. V. (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994[Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 435.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008[Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466-470.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813003012/mw2101sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813003012/mw2101Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813003012/mw2101Isup3.cml

checkCIF report


Comment top

Stable complexes formed between simple alkyl carboxylic acids and alkyl amines have been reported e.g. (Karlsson et al., 2000; Wood et al., 2012a; Wood et al., 2012b) most commonly from spectroscopic studies. Interestingly there also exist examples of 2:1 and 3:1 acid amine complexes, usually in an acid-rich environment (Sun et al., 2011; Kohler et al., 1981). No equivalent amine-rich complexes have yet been observed, although (Smith et al., 2001) and (Smith et al., 2002) have reported a diamine complex formed between methylamine and dnsa due to deprotonation of the phenolic group in the acid (Smith et al., 2002).

Such acid:amine complexes are generally considered to derive their stablity from the complete transfer of a proton from the acid to the amine with subsequent cation-anion electrostatic interaction and strong hydrogen-bond formation. In 2:1 or higher stoichiometry complexes, the hydrogen bond is considered to extend over the three (or more) species involved. However, because there are very limited single crystal diffraction data, the exact form of the interactions are not clear.

In this paper the crystal structure of the 2:1 complex formed by two heptanoic acid molecules and benzylamine is reported. This complex results from the donation of a proton from one acid to the base, forming a carboxylate anion and an ammonium cation. This pair of ions, along with an additional protonated acid molecule, forms the structure illustrated in Figure 1.

All these species interact strongly by electrostatic forces and hydrogen bonding. Figure 2 illustrates the non-covalent interactions around one ammonium ion. There are three hydrogen bonds around each ammonium group nitrogen atom (indicated by dotted black lines in the Figure). Unexpectedly, an additional short contact is observed between the carbonyl group of a protonated acid and the nitrogen atom of the ammonium ion with no hydrogen atom. This interaction is also indicated by a black dotted line in Figure 2.

Figure 3 illustrates the four hydrogen bonds around each carboxylate ion. Interestingly there are two hydrogen bonds evident for each oxygen (indicated by dotted black lines in the Figure).

An illustration of the two hydrogen bonds made by the protonated acid molecules is given in Figure 4. The non-protonated oxygen forms a hydrogen bond with an adjacent carboxylate ion. The other carbonyl group appears to interact with the nitrogen of an ammonium ion.

The alkyl chain of the protonated acid group shows a significant degree of conformational disorder. The chain is not all trans but shows gauche conformers.

Related literature top

For spectroscopic studies of acid–amine complexes, see: Karlsson et al. (2000); Kohler et al. (1981); Smith et al. (2001, 2002); Klokkenburg et al. (2007). For recent diffraction studies of acid–amine complexes, see: Jefferson et al. (2011); Sun et al. (2011); Wood & Clarke (2012a,b).

Experimental top

Heptanoic acid and benzylamine, with purities of 99.8% and 99.7% respectively (titration and GC), were obtained from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. A small volume (approximately 1 mL) of each material was placed into two small vials and placed inside a larger vial with an inert atmosphere of nitrogen for a number of weeks, during which numerous crystals grew, particularly on a sample of polypropylene included as a nucleating surface, and around the top of the outer vial. Reaction of the amine with atmospheric CO2, was prevented by the inert atmosphere (Sun et al. 2011). The samples were measured at a temperature of 180 K.

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Illustration of the title compound with atom labels.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Three hydrogen bonds around each ammonium group nitrogen atom indicated by dotted black lines. The additional interaction of the carbonyl group of the protonated acid and the nitrogen atom of the ammonium ion is also indicated by a black dotted line.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Hydrogen bonding around each carboxylate ion showing four hydrogen bonds, two for each oxygen, indicated by dotted black lines.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. Illustration of the two non-covalent bonds made by the protonated acid molecules indicated by black dotted lines.
Benzylammonium heptanoate–heptanoic acid (1/1) top
Crystal data top
C7H10N+·C7H13O2−·C7H14O2F(000) = 1616
Mr = 367.52Dx = 1.079 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 15490 reflections
a = 25.5516 (5) Åθ = 1.0–27.5°
b = 6.3250 (1) ŵ = 0.07 mm−1
c = 27.9899 (6) ÅT = 180 K
β = 90.639 (1)°Block, colourless
V = 4523.27 (15) Å30.23 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
Z = 8
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer		2353 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.060
Thin slice ω and ϕ scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 1.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SORTAV; Blessing, 1995)		h = −32→32
Tmin = 0.910, Tmax = 1.000k = −8→8
22723 measured reflectionsl = −34→36
5085 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.068Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.238H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.98 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1334P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
5085 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
232 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å−3
10 restraintsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å−3
Crystal data top
C7H10N+·C7H13O2−·C7H14O2V = 4523.27 (15) Å3
Mr = 367.52Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 25.5516 (5) ŵ = 0.07 mm−1
b = 6.3250 (1) ÅT = 180 K
c = 27.9899 (6) Å0.23 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
β = 90.639 (1)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer		5085 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SORTAV; Blessing, 1995)		2353 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.910, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.060
22723 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.06810 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.238H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.98Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3
5085 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å−3
232 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Part of the C7H14O2 molecule is disordered over two sites. In the refinement, the disordered carbon atoms were assigned common isotropic displacement parameters and geometric constraints.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Part of the C7H14O2 molecule is disordered over two sites. In the refinement, the disordered carbon atoms were assigned common isotropic displacement parameters and geometric constraints.

The dataset presented is one of a number of separate datasets collected from different crystals. Even so, the crystal diffracted very poorly, a fact reflected in the low percentage of observed structure factors, the use of common isotropic displacement parameters for the disordered parts, and the 'unreasonable' bond lengths.

The SORTAV process was found to make no significant difference in this case which can be attributed to the Mo radiation and such a small crystal, the tiny mount and minimal oil, as one would expect. The SORTAV process was run as a check and to ensure that the equivalent reflections have been measured correctly - routine in our laboratory. The low percentage of observed reflections is due to the strenuous efforts which were made to measure everything possible with this poor crystal. The theta limit which was set for the data collection (27.5°) was probably higher than ideal but did ensure that nothing was missed. Again this was due to the very small, very poorly diffracting crystal.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
N10.25507 (7)0.5059 (3)0.03427 (7)0.0424 (5)
H1A0.27740.61440.04090.051*
H1B0.25010.49620.00210.051*
H1C0.26890.38280.04550.051*
C10.20393 (9)0.5458 (5)0.05763 (10)0.0527 (7)
H1D0.17920.43170.04870.063*
H1E0.18930.68090.04560.063*
C20.20856 (9)0.5559 (4)0.11088 (9)0.0473 (7)
C30.21988 (13)0.7431 (5)0.13377 (12)0.0727 (9)
H3A0.22560.86700.11540.087*
C40.22312 (17)0.7544 (8)0.18266 (15)0.0993 (13)
H4A0.23140.88510.19770.119*
C50.21472 (16)0.5823 (9)0.20932 (14)0.0980 (13)
H5A0.21610.59240.24320.118*
C60.20433 (14)0.3944 (8)0.18833 (14)0.0905 (12)
H6A0.19920.27230.20740.109*
C70.20111 (11)0.3793 (5)0.13874 (12)0.0645 (8)
H7A0.19380.24680.12410.077*
O10.33127 (6)−0.1921 (3)0.05299 (7)0.0546 (5)
O20.28197 (6)0.0932 (3)0.05844 (6)0.0463 (5)
C80.32360 (9)−0.0055 (4)0.06701 (8)0.0418 (6)
C90.36768 (10)0.1019 (4)0.09405 (10)0.0534 (7)
H9A0.3868−0.00680.11280.064*
H9B0.39240.16090.07050.064*
C100.35192 (10)0.2769 (5)0.12763 (10)0.0582 (8)
H10A0.33010.21620.15320.070*
H10B0.33020.38030.10980.070*
C110.39793 (11)0.3921 (5)0.15034 (11)0.0633 (8)
H11A0.41990.28760.16760.076*
H11B0.41950.45310.12460.076*
C120.38396 (13)0.5658 (5)0.18440 (12)0.0705 (9)
H12A0.36550.50340.21200.085*
H12B0.35940.66400.16820.085*
C130.43051 (13)0.6901 (6)0.20273 (12)0.0771 (10)
H13A0.45470.59220.21960.092*
H13B0.44940.74940.17510.092*
C140.41686 (16)0.8661 (7)0.23573 (15)0.1033 (13)
H14A0.44810.95140.24240.155*
H14B0.40360.80760.26570.155*
H14C0.38990.95510.22080.155*
O30.41440 (7)−0.3928 (3)0.02418 (8)0.0701 (6)
H30.3877−0.33580.03580.105*
O40.35537 (7)−0.5688 (3)−0.01877 (8)0.0704 (6)
C150.40002 (10)−0.5389 (5)−0.00680 (11)0.0555 (7)
C160.44577 (11)−0.6652 (6)−0.02485 (12)0.0709 (9)
H16A0.4710−0.5666−0.03950.085*
H16B0.4636−0.73240.00280.085*
C170.43247 (12)−0.8326 (6)−0.06032 (14)0.0839 (11)0.49
H17A0.4200−0.7641−0.09010.101*0.49
H17B0.4033−0.9183−0.04780.101*0.49
C180.4783 (3)−0.9817 (12)−0.0724 (2)0.0717 (14)*0.49
H18A0.4777−1.1102−0.05220.086*0.49
H18B0.5124−0.9096−0.06800.086*0.49
C190.4670 (3)−1.0438 (12)−0.1319 (3)0.0877 (15)*0.49
H19A0.4450−0.9367−0.14830.105*0.49
H19B0.4999−1.0645−0.14960.105*0.49
C200.4385 (3)−1.2460 (14)−0.1242 (3)0.0993 (19)*0.49
H20A0.4595−1.3307−0.10130.119*0.49
H20B0.4053−1.2108−0.10820.119*0.49
C210.4256 (5)−1.3835 (17)−0.1646 (4)0.106 (2)*0.49
H21A0.4101−1.5150−0.15280.159*0.49
H21B0.4574−1.4159−0.18230.159*0.49
H21C0.4005−1.3117−0.18570.159*0.49
C17'0.43247 (12)−0.8326 (6)−0.06032 (14)0.0839 (11)0.51
H17C0.4058−0.7777−0.08310.101*0.51
H17D0.4172−0.9554−0.04350.101*0.51
C18'0.4805 (3)−0.9045 (10)−0.0879 (3)0.0717 (14)*0.51
H18C0.5128−0.8886−0.06840.086*0.51
H18D0.4842−0.8238−0.11790.086*0.51
C19'0.4673 (3)−1.1640 (12)−0.0990 (2)0.0877 (15)*0.51
H19C0.4995−1.2507−0.10030.105*0.51
H19D0.4429−1.2248−0.07540.105*0.51
C20'0.4422 (3)−1.1380 (14)−0.1470 (3)0.0993 (19)*0.51
H20C0.4650−1.0449−0.16620.119*0.51
H20D0.4087−1.0625−0.14260.119*0.51
C21'0.4310 (5)−1.3384 (17)−0.1765 (4)0.106 (2)*0.51
H21D0.4203−1.2983−0.20900.159*0.51
H21E0.4028−1.4191−0.16150.159*0.51
H21F0.4627−1.4255−0.17770.159*0.51
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0403 (11)0.0341 (11)0.0527 (12)0.0018 (9)−0.0060 (9)−0.0029 (10)
C10.0403 (14)0.0564 (17)0.0615 (17)0.0019 (12)0.0005 (12)−0.0009 (14)
C20.0397 (13)0.0473 (16)0.0549 (16)0.0021 (11)−0.0005 (12)0.0002 (14)
C30.088 (2)0.058 (2)0.072 (2)−0.0087 (17)0.0125 (18)−0.0083 (18)
C40.115 (3)0.110 (3)0.074 (3)−0.019 (3)0.005 (2)−0.032 (3)
C50.090 (3)0.145 (4)0.059 (2)0.008 (3)0.000 (2)−0.007 (3)
C60.083 (2)0.113 (3)0.077 (3)0.031 (2)0.017 (2)0.043 (2)
C70.0605 (18)0.0527 (18)0.081 (2)0.0095 (13)0.0092 (16)0.0057 (17)
O10.0454 (10)0.0379 (11)0.0804 (13)0.0005 (8)−0.0072 (9)−0.0089 (10)
O20.0420 (10)0.0388 (10)0.0579 (11)0.0010 (7)−0.0100 (8)−0.0012 (8)
C80.0416 (14)0.0351 (14)0.0485 (15)−0.0015 (11)−0.0029 (11)0.0009 (12)
C90.0452 (14)0.0510 (17)0.0637 (17)0.0000 (12)−0.0121 (13)−0.0049 (14)
C100.0517 (16)0.0588 (18)0.0637 (18)−0.0013 (13)−0.0142 (13)−0.0090 (15)
C110.0556 (17)0.0654 (19)0.0686 (19)−0.0050 (14)−0.0186 (14)−0.0105 (16)
C120.071 (2)0.071 (2)0.069 (2)0.0005 (16)−0.0136 (16)−0.0146 (17)
C130.078 (2)0.081 (2)0.072 (2)−0.0093 (18)−0.0075 (17)−0.0231 (19)
C140.106 (3)0.101 (3)0.103 (3)−0.017 (2)−0.001 (2)−0.037 (2)
O30.0422 (11)0.0786 (15)0.0893 (15)−0.0003 (9)−0.0027 (10)−0.0185 (12)
O40.0377 (11)0.0696 (14)0.1039 (17)0.0009 (9)−0.0006 (10)−0.0212 (12)
C150.0392 (15)0.0550 (18)0.0724 (19)−0.0002 (13)0.0030 (14)0.0057 (16)
C160.0455 (16)0.087 (2)0.080 (2)0.0089 (15)0.0068 (15)0.0007 (19)
C170.0503 (18)0.082 (2)0.119 (3)0.0050 (16)0.0091 (18)−0.026 (2)
C17'0.0503 (18)0.082 (2)0.119 (3)0.0050 (16)0.0091 (18)−0.026 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C11.489 (3)C14—H14B0.9800
N1—H1A0.9100C14—H14C0.9800
N1—H1B0.9100O3—C151.317 (3)
N1—H1C0.9100O3—H30.8400
C1—C21.495 (4)O4—C151.200 (3)
C1—H1D0.9900C15—C161.508 (4)
C1—H1E0.9900C16—C171.488 (5)
C2—C31.375 (4)C16—H16A0.9900
C2—C71.377 (4)C16—H16B0.9900
C3—C41.372 (5)C17—C181.544 (8)
C3—H3A0.9500C17—H17A0.9900
C4—C51.338 (6)C17—H17B0.9900
C4—H4A0.9500C18—C191.732 (10)
C5—C61.351 (6)C18—H18A0.9900
C5—H5A0.9500C18—H18B0.9900
C6—C71.393 (5)C19—C201.489 (10)
C6—H6A0.9500C19—H19A0.9900
C7—H7A0.9500C19—H19B0.9900
O1—C81.260 (3)C20—C211.461 (11)
O2—C81.254 (3)C20—H20A0.9900
C8—C91.511 (4)C20—H20B0.9900
C9—C101.510 (4)C21—H21A0.9800
C9—H9A0.9900C21—H21B0.9800
C9—H9B0.9900C21—H21C0.9800
C10—C111.517 (4)C18'—C19'1.704 (9)
C10—H10A0.9900C18'—H18C0.9900
C10—H10B0.9900C18'—H18D0.9900
C11—C121.500 (4)C19'—C20'1.489 (10)
C11—H11A0.9900C19'—H19C0.9900
C11—H11B0.9900C19'—H19D0.9900
C12—C131.511 (4)C20'—C21'1.538 (11)
C12—H12A0.9900C20'—H20C0.9900
C12—H12B0.9900C20'—H20D0.9900
C13—C141.491 (5)C21'—H21D0.9800
C13—H13A0.9900C21'—H21E0.9800
C13—H13B0.9900C21'—H21F0.9800
C14—H14A0.9800
C1—N1—H1A109.5H13A—C13—H13B107.6
C1—N1—H1B109.5C13—C14—H14A109.5
H1A—N1—H1B109.5C13—C14—H14B109.5
C1—N1—H1C109.5H14A—C14—H14B109.5
H1A—N1—H1C109.5C13—C14—H14C109.5
H1B—N1—H1C109.5H14A—C14—H14C109.5
N1—C1—C2112.6 (2)H14B—C14—H14C109.5
N1—C1—H1D109.1C15—O3—H3109.5
C2—C1—H1D109.1O4—C15—O3123.5 (3)
N1—C1—H1E109.1O4—C15—C16124.1 (3)
C2—C1—H1E109.1O3—C15—C16112.4 (2)
H1D—C1—H1E107.8C17—C16—C15115.4 (3)
C3—C2—C7117.7 (3)C17—C16—H16A108.4
C3—C2—C1121.0 (3)C15—C16—H16A108.4
C7—C2—C1121.3 (3)C17—C16—H16B108.4
C4—C3—C2121.3 (3)C15—C16—H16B108.4
C4—C3—H3A119.3H16A—C16—H16B107.5
C2—C3—H3A119.3C16—C17—C18114.4 (4)
C5—C4—C3120.4 (4)C16—C17—H17A108.7
C5—C4—H4A119.8C18—C17—H17A108.7
C3—C4—H4A119.8C16—C17—H17B108.7
C4—C5—C6120.3 (4)C18—C17—H17B108.7
C4—C5—H5A119.8H17A—C17—H17B107.6
C6—C5—H5A119.8C17—C18—C19103.4 (5)
C5—C6—C7120.2 (4)C17—C18—H18A111.1
C5—C6—H6A119.9C19—C18—H18A111.1
C7—C6—H6A119.9C17—C18—H18B111.1
C2—C7—C6120.1 (3)C19—C18—H18B111.1
C2—C7—H7A120.0H18A—C18—H18B109.1
C6—C7—H7A120.0C20—C19—C1897.6 (6)
O2—C8—O1122.8 (2)C20—C19—H19A112.3
O2—C8—C9119.9 (2)C18—C19—H19A112.3
O1—C8—C9117.3 (2)C20—C19—H19B112.3
C10—C9—C8116.0 (2)C18—C19—H19B112.3
C10—C9—H9A108.3H19A—C19—H19B109.8
C8—C9—H9A108.3C21—C20—C19120.4 (8)
C10—C9—H9B108.3C21—C20—H20A107.2
C8—C9—H9B108.3C19—C20—H20A107.2
H9A—C9—H9B107.4C21—C20—H20B107.2
C9—C10—C11113.7 (2)C19—C20—H20B107.2
C9—C10—H10A108.8H20A—C20—H20B106.9
C11—C10—H10A108.8C19'—C18'—H18C111.2
C9—C10—H10B108.8C19'—C18'—H18D111.2
C11—C10—H10B108.8H18C—C18'—H18D109.1
H10A—C10—H10B107.7C20'—C19'—C18'98.1 (6)
C12—C11—C10115.4 (2)C20'—C19'—H19C112.1
C12—C11—H11A108.4C18'—C19'—H19C112.1
C10—C11—H11A108.4C20'—C19'—H19D112.1
C12—C11—H11B108.4C18'—C19'—H19D112.1
C10—C11—H11B108.4H19C—C19'—H19D109.8
H11A—C11—H11B107.5C19'—C20'—C21'117.9 (8)
C11—C12—C13113.9 (3)C19'—C20'—H20C107.8
C11—C12—H12A108.8C21'—C20'—H20C107.8
C13—C12—H12A108.8C19'—C20'—H20D107.8
C11—C12—H12B108.8C21'—C20'—H20D107.8
C13—C12—H12B108.8H20C—C20'—H20D107.2
H12A—C12—H12B107.7C20'—C21'—H21D109.5
C14—C13—C12114.2 (3)C20'—C21'—H21E109.5
C14—C13—H13A108.7H21D—C21'—H21E109.5
C12—C13—H13A108.7C20'—C21'—H21F109.5
C14—C13—H13B108.7H21D—C21'—H21F109.5
C12—C13—H13B108.7H21E—C21'—H21F109.5
C1—C2—C3—C4178.6 (3)C8—C9—C10—C11−174.7 (2)
C7—C2—C3—C4−0.7 (5)C9—C10—C11—C12−179.4 (2)
C1—C2—C7—C6−178.3 (3)C10—C11—C12—C13−174.6 (3)
C3—C2—C7—C61.0 (4)C11—C12—C13—C14178.7 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.7 (6)C16—C17—C18—C19−146.8 (4)
C3—C4—C5—C61.8 (7)C17—C18—C19—C20−95.3 (6)
C4—C5—C6—C7−1.5 (7)C18—C19—C20—C21−171.6 (8)
C5—C6—C7—C20.1 (6)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.911.872.773 (3)171
N1—H1B···O2ii0.911.962.823 (3)158
N1—H1C···O20.911.902.781 (3)164
O3—H3···O10.841.782.610 (3)172
C1—H1D···O4iii0.992.603.542 (4)160
C3—H3A···O2i0.952.593.456 (4)152
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z; (iii) −x+1/2, −y−1/2, −z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC7H10N+·C7H13O2−·C7H14O2
Mr367.52
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)180
a, b, c (Å)25.5516 (5), 6.3250 (1), 27.9899 (6)
β (°) 90.639 (1)
V (Å3)4523.27 (15)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm−1)0.07
Crystal size (mm)0.23 × 0.05 × 0.05
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SORTAV; Blessing, 1995)
Tmin, Tmax0.910, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections		22723, 5085, 2353
Rint0.060
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.068, 0.238, 0.98
No. of reflections5085
No. of parameters232
No. of restraints10
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.29, −0.20

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.911.872.773 (3)171
N1—H1B···O2ii0.911.962.823 (3)158
N1—H1C···O20.911.902.781 (3)164
O3—H3···O10.841.782.610 (3)172
C1—H1D···O4iii0.992.603.542 (4)160
C3—H3A···O2i0.952.593.456 (4)152
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z; (iii) −x+1/2, −y−1/2, −z.
 

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of Chemistry, the BP Institute and the Oppenheimer Trust for financial and technical assistance, and Dr J. E. Davies for collecting and analysing the X-ray data.

References

First citationAltomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 435.  CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationBlessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationJefferson, A. E., Sun, C., Bond, A. D. & Clarke, S. M. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o655.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationKarlsson, S., Backlund, S. & Friman, R. (2000). Colloid Polym. Sci. 278, 8–14.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationKlokkenburg, M., Hilhorst, J. & Erne, B. H. (2007). Vib. Spectrosc. 43, 243–248.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationKohler, F., Atrops, H., Kalali, H., Liebermann, E., Wilhelm, E., Ratkovics, F. & Salamon, T. (1981). J. Phys. Chem. 85, 2520–2524.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationMacrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationNonius, B. V. (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
 First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSmith, G., Wermuth, U. D., Bott, R. C., Healy, P. C. & White, J. M. (2002). Aust. J. Chem. 55, 349–356.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationSmith, G., Wermuth, U. D., Bott, R. C., White, J. M. & Willis, A. C. (2001). Aust. J. Chem. 54, 165–170.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationSun, S., Bojdys, M. J., Clarke, S. M., Harper, L. D., Castro, M. A. & Medina, S. (2011). Langmuir, 27, 3626–3637.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
 First citationWood, M. H. & Clarke, S. M. (2012a). Acta Cryst. E68, o3004.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationWood, M. H. & Clarke, S. M. (2012b). Acta Cryst. E68, o3335.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 69| Part 3| March 2013| Pages o346-o347
doi:10.1107/S1600536813003012
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS