inorganic compounds
Ammonium diphosphitoindate(III)
aLaboratoire Sciences des Matériaux, Faculté de Chimie, Université des Sciences et de la Technologie Houari Boumediene, BP 32 El-Alia, 16111 Bab-Ezzouar Alger, Algeria, and bEcole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6226, Avenue du Général Leclerc CS 50837, 35708 Rennes Cedex 7, France
*Correspondence e-mail: eric.le-fur@ensc-rennes.fr
The 4[In(HPO3)2], is built up from InIII cations (site symmetry 3m.) adopting an octahedral environment and two different phosphite anions (each with 3m.) exhibiting a triangular–pyramidal geometry. Each InO6 octahedron shares its six apices with hydrogen phosphite groups. Reciprocally, each HPO3 group shares all its O atoms with three different metal cations, leading to [In(HPO3)2]− layers which propagate in the ab plane. The ammonium cation likewise has 3m.. In the structure, the cations are located between the [In(HPO3)2]− layers of the host framework. The sheets are held together by hydrogen bonds formed between the NH4+ cations and the O atoms of the framework.
of the title compound, NHRelated literature
For general background, see: Natarajan & Mandal (2008); Marcos et al. (1993). For related structures, see: Li et al. (2013); Hamchaoui et al. (2013); Giester (2000); Graeber & Rosenzweig (1971). For potential applications of open-framework transition metal phosphates, see: Cheetham et al. (1999). For the synthesis of the first organically templated vanadium phosphite with an open framework, see: Bonavia et al. (1995). Structures of purely inorganic phosphite compounds have been evidenced with magnetic and non-magnetic cations (Marcos et al., 1993; Morris et al., 1994; Orive et al., 2011) while closely related structures can be obtained by replacing organic cations by inorganic ones as observed in the AxMn3(HPO3)4 system [A = en (Fernández et al., 2000); A = K (Hamchaoui et al., 2009)].
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell DIRAX/LSQ (Duisenberg, 1992); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).
Supporting information
10.1107/S160053681300771X/ru2050sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681300771X/ru2050Isup2.hkl
The title compound was prepared under mild hydrothermal conditions and autogenous pressure. The starting reagents were InCl3 (Sigma-Aldrich, 98%), H3PO3 (Aldrich, 99%), (NH4)2CO3 (Fluka, 30–33% of NH3) and deionized water in a 2:15:4:280 molar ratio. The mixture was placed in a 23 ml Teflon-lined steel autoclave, heated at 453 K for 72 h and followed by slow cooling to room temperature. Well formed colorless crystals were recovered by vacuum filtration, washed with deionized water and dried in a desiccator.
Part of the H atoms was localized from a difference Fourier map (HP2 and HN1) others were placed in calculated position according to geometrical constraints. Hydrogen atom positions of the ammonium cation were refined with their N—H and H—H distances restrained to one common refined value (0.87 Å and 1.33 Å respectively)
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell
DIRAX/LSQ (Duisenberg, 1992); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit and symmetry-related atoms of NH4[In(HPO3)2], shown with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. [symmetry codes: (i) -y, x-y + 1, z; (ii) -x + y - 1, -x, z; (iii) -y - 1, x-y, z; (iv) -x + y - 1, -x - 1, z; (v) -y, x-y, z; (vi) -x + y, -x, z]. | |
Fig. 2. Projection along the [010] direction, showing the two-dimensional framework in NH4[In(HPO3)2]. | |
Fig. 3. H-bonding arrangement between the ammonium cations and the host framework [symmetry codes: (ii) -x + y - 1, -x, z; (iii) -y - 1, x-y, z; (iv) -x + y - 1, -x - 1, z; (v) -y, x-y, z; (vii) x - 1, y - 1, z; (viii) x-y, x, -0.5 + z, (ix) y - 1, -x + y - 1, -0.5 + z; (x) -x - 1, -y, -0.5 + z]. |
NH4[In(HPO3)2] | Dx = 2.867 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 292.82 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hexagonal, P63mc | Cell parameters from 1590 reflections |
a = 5.4705 (1) Å | θ = 2.9–42.1° |
c = 13.0895 (4) Å | µ = 3.93 mm−1 |
V = 339.24 (1) Å3 | T = 293 K |
Z = 2 | Block, colourless |
F(000) = 280 | 0.1 × 0.05 × 0.02 mm |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 962 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 912 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.024 |
CCD rotation images, thick slices scans | θmax = 42.0°, θmin = 4.3° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) | h = −10→9 |
Tmin = 0.66, Tmax = 0.92 | k = −10→9 |
7774 measured reflections | l = −24→24 |
Refinement on F2 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
Least-squares matrix: full | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.017 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0183P)2 + 0.0737P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.041 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.003 |
S = 1.26 | Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3 |
962 reflections | Δρmin = −1.39 e Å−3 |
30 parameters | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
5 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 0.092 (4) |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 459 Friedel pairs |
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map | Absolute structure parameter: −0.01 (2) |
NH4[In(HPO3)2] | Z = 2 |
Mr = 292.82 | Mo Kα radiation |
Hexagonal, P63mc | µ = 3.93 mm−1 |
a = 5.4705 (1) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 13.0895 (4) Å | 0.1 × 0.05 × 0.02 mm |
V = 339.24 (1) Å3 |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 962 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) | 912 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.66, Tmax = 0.92 | Rint = 0.024 |
7774 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.017 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.041 | Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3 |
S = 1.26 | Δρmin = −1.39 e Å−3 |
962 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 459 Friedel pairs |
30 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: −0.01 (2) |
5 restraints |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
In1 | −0.3333 | 0.3333 | −0.5985 | 0.01029 (5) | |
P1 | −0.6667 | −0.3333 | −0.47231 (7) | 0.00954 (13) | |
P2 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | −0.65957 (6) | 0.00968 (14) | |
O1 | −0.15240 (16) | 0.15240 (16) | −0.69716 (14) | 0.0201 (3) | |
O2 | −0.5126 (2) | −0.0252 (4) | −0.5013 (2) | 0.0276 (4) | |
N1 | −0.6667 | −0.3333 | −0.8024 (3) | 0.0222 (7) | |
HP1 | −0.6667 | −0.3333 | −0.378 (9) | 0.027* | |
HP2 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | −0.553 (6) | 0.027* | |
HN1 | −0.5809 (18) | −0.162 (4) | −0.782 (3) | 0.027* | |
HN2 | −0.6667 | −0.3333 | −0.8705 (8) | 0.027* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
In1 | 0.00741 (6) | 0.00741 (6) | 0.01606 (8) | 0.00371 (3) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
P1 | 0.00840 (19) | 0.00840 (19) | 0.0118 (3) | 0.00420 (9) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
P2 | 0.00826 (19) | 0.00826 (19) | 0.0125 (4) | 0.00413 (9) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0275 (7) | 0.0275 (7) | 0.0188 (6) | 0.0240 (8) | −0.0001 (2) | 0.0001 (2) |
O2 | 0.0282 (7) | 0.0120 (7) | 0.0374 (9) | 0.0060 (4) | 0.0053 (4) | 0.0106 (7) |
N1 | 0.0232 (10) | 0.0232 (10) | 0.0203 (16) | 0.0116 (5) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
In1—O2i | 2.1226 (19) | P1—O2iii | 1.5082 (18) |
In1—O2 | 2.1226 (19) | P1—O2 | 1.5082 (18) |
In1—O2ii | 2.1226 (19) | P1—O2iv | 1.5082 (18) |
In1—O1 | 2.1461 (17) | P2—O1v | 1.5255 (16) |
In1—O1ii | 2.1461 (17) | P2—O1vi | 1.5255 (16) |
In1—O1i | 2.1461 (17) | P2—O1 | 1.5255 (15) |
O2i—In1—O2 | 87.75 (10) | O2ii—In1—O1i | 92.35 (6) |
O2i—In1—O2ii | 87.75 (10) | O1—In1—O1i | 87.55 (7) |
O2—In1—O2ii | 87.75 (10) | O1ii—In1—O1i | 87.55 (7) |
O2i—In1—O1 | 92.35 (6) | O2iii—P1—O2 | 113.89 (9) |
O2—In1—O1 | 92.35 (6) | O2iii—P1—O2iv | 113.89 (9) |
O2ii—In1—O1 | 179.86 (9) | O2—P1—O2iv | 113.89 (9) |
O2i—In1—O1ii | 179.86 (9) | O1v—P2—O1vi | 110.12 (7) |
O2—In1—O1ii | 92.35 (6) | O1v—P2—O1 | 110.12 (7) |
O2ii—In1—O1ii | 92.35 (6) | O1vi—P2—O1 | 110.12 (7) |
O1—In1—O1ii | 87.55 (7) | P2—O1—In1 | 124.21 (11) |
O2i—In1—O1i | 92.35 (6) | P1—O2—In1 | 157.74 (17) |
O2—In1—O1i | 179.86 (10) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −y, x−y+1, z; (ii) −x+y−1, −x, z; (iii) −y−1, x−y, z; (iv) −x+y−1, −x−1, z; (v) −y, x−y, z; (vi) −x+y, −x, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—HN1···O1 | 0.86 (2) | 2.38 (2) | 3.066 (2) | 138 (2) |
N1—HN1···O1ii | 0.86 (2) | 2.38 (2) | 3.066 (2) | 138 (2) |
N1—HN2···O2vii | 0.89 (1) | 2.41 (1) | 3.109 (4) | 135 (1) |
N1—HN2···O2viii | 0.89 (1) | 2.41 (1) | 3.109 (4) | 135 (1) |
N1—HN2···O2ix | 0.89 (1) | 2.41 (1) | 3.109 (4) | 135 (1) |
N1—HN2···O2x | 0.89 (1) | 2.41 (1) | 3.109 (4) | 135 (1) |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+y−1, −x, z; (vii) x−y, x, z−1/2; (viii) −x−1, −y, z−1/2; (ix) y−1, −x+y−1, z−1/2; (x) y−1, x, z−1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | NH4[In(HPO3)2] |
Mr | 292.82 |
Crystal system, space group | Hexagonal, P63mc |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, c (Å) | 5.4705 (1), 13.0895 (4) |
V (Å3) | 339.24 (1) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 3.93 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.1 × 0.05 × 0.02 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.66, 0.92 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 7774, 962, 912 |
Rint | 0.024 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.941 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.017, 0.041, 1.26 |
No. of reflections | 962 |
No. of parameters | 30 |
No. of restraints | 5 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.51, −1.39 |
Absolute structure | Flack (1983), 459 Friedel pairs |
Absolute structure parameter | −0.01 (2) |
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), DIRAX/LSQ (Duisenberg, 1992), EVALCCD (Duisenberg, 1998), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005), WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—HN1···O1 | 0.86 (2) | 2.38 (2) | 3.066 (2) | 137.8 (15) |
N1—HN1···O1i | 0.86 (2) | 2.38 (2) | 3.066 (2) | 137.8 (15) |
N1—HN2···O2ii | 0.891 (11) | 2.412 (8) | 3.109 (4) | 135.23 (18) |
N1—HN2···O2iii | 0.891 (11) | 2.412 (8) | 3.109 (4) | 135.23 (18) |
N1—HN2···O2iv | 0.891 (11) | 2.412 (8) | 3.109 (4) | 135.23 (18) |
N1—HN2···O2v | 0.891 (11) | 2.412 (8) | 3.109 (4) | 135.23 (18) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y−1, −x, z; (ii) x−y, x, z−1/2; (iii) −x−1, −y, z−1/2; (iv) y−1, −x+y−1, z−1/2; (v) y−1, x, z−1/2. |
Footnotes
‡Université Européenne de Bretagne.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Algerian–French program CMEP-PHC Tassili 10 MDU 819. The authors are indebted to T. Roisnel for the data collection at the Centre de Diffractométrie des Rayons X (CDIFX).
References
Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bonavia, G., DeBord, J., Haushalter, R. C., Rose, D. & Zubieta, J. (1995). Chem. Mater. 7, 1995–1998. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (2005). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Cheetham, A. K., Férey, G. & Loiseau, T. (1999). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 38, 3268–3292. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Duisenberg, A. J. M. (1992). J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 92–96. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Duisenberg, A. J. M. (1998). Thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fernández, S., Mesa, J. L., Pizarro, J. L., Lezama, L., Arriortua, M. I., Olazcuaga, R. & Rojo, T. (2000). Chem. Mater. 12, 2092–2098. Google Scholar
Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Giester, G. (2000). J. Alloys Compd, 308, 71–76. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Graeber, E. J. & Rosenzweig, A. (1971). Am. Mineral. 56, 1917–1933. CAS Google Scholar
Hamchaoui, F., Alonzo, V., Roisnel, T., Rebbah, H. & Le Fur, E. (2009). Acta Cryst. C65, i33–i35. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hamchaoui, F., Alonzo, V., Venegas-Yazigi, D., Rebbah, H. & Le Fur, E. (2013). J. Solid State Chem. 198, 295–302. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Li, H., Zhang, L., Huo, Q. & Liu, Y. (2013). J. Solid State Chem. 197, 75–80. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Marcos, M. D., Amoros, P. & Le Bail, A. (1993). J. Solid State Chem. 107, 250–257. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Morris, R. E., Attfield, M. P. & Cheetham, A. K. (1994). Acta Cryst. C50, 473–476. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Natarajan, S. & Mandal, S. (2008). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 4798–4828. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Orive, J., Mesa, J. L., Balda, R., Fernandez, J., Rodrıguez Fernández, J., Rojo, T. & Arriortua, M. I. (2011). Inorg. Chem. 50, 12463–12476. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2002). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
After the discovery of microporous aluminophosphates, considerable efforts have been directed towards the synthesis of new open-framework transition metal phosphates because of their potential applications (Cheetham et al., 1999). The replacement of phosphate by phosphite in transition metal phosphates has recently attracted effort, notably since the synthesis of the first organically templated vanadium phosphite with an open framework (Bonavia et al., 1995). Consequently the literature is currently dominated by reports of organically template phosphite frame- works (Natarajan & Mandal, 2008). Purely inorganic phosphite structures have also been evidenced with magnetic and non-magnetic cations (Marcos et al., 1993, Morris et al., 1994, Orive et al., 2011) while, interestingly, closely related structures can be obtained by replacing organic cations by inorganic ones as observed in the AxMn3(HPO3)4 system. (A = en: Fernández et al., 2000, A = K: Hamchaoui et al., 2009).
The structure of the title compound is built up from In(HPO3)2 layers separated by NH4 cations. It is isostructural to (H3O)In(HPO3)2 (Li et al., 2013) and to the A[M(HPO3)2] family (A = K, Rb, NH4 and M = V, Fe) (Hamchaoui et al., 2013). The structural model is also related to the yavapaiite aluns type (Graeber & Rosenzweig, 1971) and the mixed selenite-selenate [(RbFe(SeO4)(SeO3)](Giester, 2000). As shown in Fig. 1, the asymmetric unit contains one crystallographic independant InIII cation and two ones for both phosphorus and oxygen atoms. Six oxygen atoms define an octahedral geometry around the metallic center while three oxygen atoms and one hydrogen atom define the triangular pyramidal environment of the phosphorus atom. The quaternary ammonium ions are displayed between the [M(HPO3)2]- layers of the host framework (Fig. 2). They exhibit N—H bond distances in the range usually found for this cation and the angles are similar to those expected for sp3 hybridization. Thus for 1 the sheets are held together by hydrogen bonds formed between and the oxygen atoms of the framework. This H-bonding arrangement is illustrated in Fig. 3. It shows that the ammonium ion is firmly fixed in the structure by means of nine N—H···O hydrogen bonds, which prevent free ammonium-ion rotation at 298 K. The ammonium cations are located at the center of the six-ring windows of the upper layer.