Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 69| Part 5| May 2013| Pages m250-m251
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813008751

Pseudosymmetric fac-di­aqua­tri­chlorido[(di­methyl­phosphor­yl)methanaminium-κO]manganese(II)

Guido J. Reissa*

aInstitut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie, Lehrstuhl II: Material- und Strukturforschung, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstrasse 1, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: reissg@hhu.de

(Received 7 March 2013; accepted 30 March 2013; online 10 April 2013)

In the title compound, [Mn(C3H11NOP)Cl3(H2O)2], the MnII metal center has a distorted o­cta­hedral geometry, coordinated by the three chloride ligands showing a facial arrangement. Two water mol­ecules and the O-coordinated dpmaH cation [dpmaH = (di­methyl­phosphor­yl)methanaminium] complete the coordination sphere. Each complex mol­ecule is connected to its neighbours by O—H⋯Cl and N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds. Two of the chloride ligands and the two water ligands form a hydrogen-bonded polymeric sheet in the ab plane. Furthermore, these planes are connected to adjacent planes by hydrogen bonds from the aminium function of cationic dpmaH ligand. A pseudo-mirror plane perpendicular to the b axis in the chiral space group P21 is observed together with inversion twinning [ratio = 0.864 (5):0.136 (5)].

Related literature

For related dpma compounds, see: Borisov et al. (1994[Borisov, G., Varbanov, S. G., Venanzi, L. M., Albinati, A. & Demartin, F. (1994). Inorg. Chem. 33, 5430-5437.]); Kochel (2009[Kochel, A. (2009). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 362, 1379-1382.]); Reiss & Jörgens (2012[Reiss, G. J. & Jörgens, S. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o2899-o2900.]). For a definition of the term tecton, see: Brunet et al. (1997[Brunet, P., Simard, M. & Wuest, J. D. (1997). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 2737-2738.]). For the use of anionic phosphinic acid derivatives as supra­molecular tectons, see: Glidewell et al. (2000[Glidewell, C., Ferguson, G. & Lough, A. J. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 855-858.]); Chen et al. (2010[Chen, S.-P., Zhang, Y.-Q., Hu, L., He, H.-Z. & Yuan, L.-J. (2010). CrystEngComm, 12, 3327-3336.]). For related methyl­phosphinic acids and derivatives, see: Reiss & Engel (2008[Reiss, G. J. & Engel, J. S. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o400.]); Meyer et al. (2010[Meyer, M. K., Graf, J. & Reiss, G. J. (2010). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 65, 1462-1466.]). For graph-set theory and its applications, see: Etter et al. (1990[Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256-262.]); Bernstein et al. (1995[Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 34, 1555-1573.]); Grell et al. (2002[Grell, J., Bernstein, J. & Tinhofer, G. (2002). Crystallogr. Rev. 8, 1-56.]). For related manganese complexes, see: Głowiak & Sawka-Dobrowolska (1977[Głowiak, T. & Sawka-Dobrowolska, W. (1977). Acta Cryst. B33, 2763-2766.]); Feist et al. (1997[Feist, M., Troyanov, S., Stiewe, A., Kemnitz, E. & Kunze, R. (1997). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 52, 1094-1102.]); Kubíček et al. (2003[Kubíček, V., Vojtíček, P., Rudovský, J., Hermann, P. & Lukeš, I. (2003). Dalton Trans. pp. 3927-3938.]); Karthikeyan et al. (2011[Karthikeyan, M., Karthikeyan, S. & Manimaran, B. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, m1367.]). For manganese complexes as model system for metalloproteins, see: Wieghardt (1989[Wieghardt, K. (1989). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 28, 1153-1172.]). For examples of pseudo-symmetry, see: Jones et al. (1988[Jones, P. G., Schelbach, R., Schwarzmann, E. & Thöne, C. (1988). Acta Cryst. C44, 1196-1198.]); Reiss (2002a[Reiss, G. J. (2002a). Z. Kristallogr. 217, 550-556.],b[Reiss, G. J. (2002b). Z. Natuforsch. Teil B, 57, 479-482.]); Reiss & Konietzny (2002[Reiss, G. J. & Konietzny, S. (2002). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 862-864.]); Ruck (2000[Ruck, M. (2000). Z. Kristallogr. 215, 148-156.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Mn(C3H11NOP)Cl3(H2O)2]

  • Mr = 305.42

  • Monoclinic, P 21

  • a = 6.3535 (3) Å

  • b = 10.7304 (6) Å

  • c = 8.5629 (4) Å

  • β = 99.490 (2)°

  • V = 575.79 (5) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.95 mm−1

  • T = 290 K

  • 0.41 × 0.30 × 0.26 mm
Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008[Bruker (2008). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.723, Tmax = 0.980

  • 29900 measured reflections

  • 4538 independent reflections

  • 4518 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.030
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.014

  • wR(F2) = 0.038

  • S = 1.11

  • 4538 reflections

  • 149 parameters

  • 5 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.49 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881.]), 2165 Friedel pairs

  • Flack parameter: 0.136 (5)

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N1—H11⋯Cl2i 0.928 (19) 2.402 (19) 3.3220 (10) 171.3 (15)
N1—H12⋯Cl2ii 0.82 (2) 2.56 (2) 3.2664 (9) 145.9 (19)
N1—H13⋯Cl3ii 0.899 (17) 2.436 (17) 3.2193 (8) 145.8 (14)
O1W—H1O⋯Cl3iii 0.84 (1) 2.42 (1) 3.2360 (8) 164 (2)
O1W—H2O⋯Cl1iv 0.86 (1) 2.37 (1) 3.2021 (7) 164 (2)
O2W—H3O⋯Cl1iii 0.82 (1) 2.39 (1) 3.2026 (8) 171 (2)
O2W—H4O⋯Cl3ii 0.84 (1) 2.35 (1) 3.1635 (8) 166 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) [-x, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z]; (iii) x-1, y, z; (iv) [-x, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z].

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008[Bruker (2008). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008[Bruker (2008). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2011)[Brandenburg, K. (2011). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.]; software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813008751/gg2113sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813008751/gg2113Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813008751/gg2113Isup3.mol

checkCIF report


Comment top

Manganese complexes are of general interest as these metal centers play important roles in biological systems such as metalloproteins (Wieghardt, 1989). More than one hundred manganese complexes built by aqua, chlorido and any organic donor ligands at the same time are structurally characterized and deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database. If we limit the search on compounds with at least one aqua, one chloride and a ligand with a O-coordinated phosphoryl group the number is reduced to only two examples (Głowiak & Sawka-Dobrowolska, 1977; Kubíček et al., 2003) which are comparable with the title complex. Furthermore, alkyldiphosphinates are known to be efficient tectons (for the term tecton, see: Brunet et al., 1997) to construct hydrogen bonded frameworks (Glidewell et al., 2000). Especially it has also been shown that amino phosphinic anions are able to form hydrogen bonded one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional supramolecular architectures (Chen et al., 2010). For the neutral dmpa there are some examples that show its ability to coordinate transition metals (Borisov et al. 1994; Kochel, 2009) and also a salt containing the protonated dpmaH cation has been structurally characterized (Reiss & Jörgens, 2012). The structure determination on fac-diaquatrichlorido((dimethylphosphoryl)methanaminium)manganese(II) is part of our continuing interest in the hydrogen bonding of methylphosphinic acids and its derivatives (Reiss & Engel, 2008) and the field of application as a tectons for the construction of new hydrogen bonded networks (e.g. Meyer et al., 2010).

The title structure crystallizes in the monoclinic, chiral space group P21. The asymmetric unit consists of one formula unit of the fac-diaquatrichlorido((dimethylphosphoryl)methanaminium)manganese(II) complex. The three chlorido ligands show a facial arrangement with Mn—Cl distances between 2.5137 (3) and 2.5717 (3) Å which is in excellent agreement with other Mn(II) complexes (Głowiak & Sawka-Dobrowolska, 1977; Kubíček et al., 2003; Karthikeyan et al., 2011). The Cl—Mn—Cl angles of 92.163 (8)° to 93.346 (8)° are in the typical range of hexacoordinate aqua-chlorido manganese(II) complexes (e.g. Feist et al. 1997). The distorted octahedral coordination at the Mn(II) metal center is completed by two water molecules and a O-coordinated dpmaH cation. All Mn—O bond length as well as the geometrical parameters of the dpmaH cation are in the expected ranges. Each manganese complex is connected to adjacent complexes by O–H···Cl and N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds. Two of the chlorido ligands and the two water ligands form a hydrogen bonded two-dimensional polymer in the ab plane (Fig. 1). Adjacent layers are connected to each other by the cationic dpmaH ligand which is located between them. In detail the dpmaH ligand coordinates the manganese of one layer by its oxygen atom and forms a hydrogen bond to the next layer by its aminium group. The hydrogen bonding scheme of the formal two-dimensional polymer in the ab plane is characterized by three different types of annealed rings (Fig. 2; A, B and C-ring). All rings are classified to belong to the R22(8) graph-set descriptor (Etter et al., 1990, Bernstein et al., 1995), but they are different in detail. Ring A and B show a pseudo-inversion symmetry (for a more general introduction into pseudo-symmetry, see: Ruck, 2000) whereas ring C seems to have a mirror symmetry. The pseudo-symmetry features of the hydrogen bonding motifs are related to a pseudo-mirror plane present perpendicular to the b axis. According to the checkcif algorithm more than 90% of the atom positions of the title structure fulfill this additional symmetry element. Figure 1 visualizes this pseudosymmetry situation and it is abundantly clear that the aminium group significantly breaks this additional symmetry element. Especially in pseudosymmetric cases where no additional (super-structure) reflections are present a close look on the plausibility of structural model (Reiss, 2002a; Reiss, 2002b; Reiss & Konietzny, 2002;) and on the difference density maps are needed (Jones et al., 1988). In the latter stages of the refinement the presence of inversion twinning (ratio: 0.864 (5) / 0.136 (5)) was detected. The general hydrogen bonding scheme within the ab plane can be abstracted by a so-called constructor graph (Fig. 3; Grell et al., 2002). Especially in the constructor graph of the title structure the pseudosymmetry can be clearly seen. The infrared and Raman spectra of the title compound are shown in Fig. 4. Both spectra show bands similar to those reported for dpmaHCl (Reiss & Jörgens, 2012). A further assignment, especially for the far-infrared region of the Raman spectrum, is difficult as several lines are observed which may belong to modes of the dpma ligand or may result from stretch modes of Mn–O and Mn–Cl bonds.

Related literature top

For related dpma compounds, see: Borisov et al. (1994); Kochel (2009); Reiss & Jörgens (2012). For a definition of the term tecton, see: Brunet et al. (1997). For the use of anionic phosphinic acid derivatives as supramolecular tectons, see: Glidewell et al. (2000); Chen et al. (2010). For related methylphosphinic acids and derivatives, see: Reiss & Engel (2008); Meyer et al. (2010). For graph-set theory and its applications, see: Etter et al. (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995); Grell et al. (2002). For related manganese complexes, see: Głowiak & Sawka-Dobrowolska (1977); Feist et al. (1997); Kubíček et al. (2003); Karthikeyan et al. (2011). For manganese complexes as model system for metalloproteins, see: Wieghardt (1989). For examples of pseudo-symmetry, see: Jones et al. (1988); Reiss (2002a,b); Reiss & Konietzny (2002); Ruck (2000).

For related literature, see: .

Experimental top

For the synthesis of the title compound (I) equimolar amounts of dpma and manganese(II)chloride tetrahydrate were dissolved in concentrated HCl. Slow evaporation of this solution at room temperature yielded crystals suitable for a crystallographic structure determination.

Refinement top

Methyl H-atoms were identified in difference syntheses, idealized and refined using rigid groups allowed to rotate about the P—C bond (AFIX 137 option of the SHELXL97 program). The coordinates of all other H-atoms were refined freely with individual Uisovalues.

Structure description top

Manganese complexes are of general interest as these metal centers play important roles in biological systems such as metalloproteins (Wieghardt, 1989). More than one hundred manganese complexes built by aqua, chlorido and any organic donor ligands at the same time are structurally characterized and deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database. If we limit the search on compounds with at least one aqua, one chloride and a ligand with a O-coordinated phosphoryl group the number is reduced to only two examples (Głowiak & Sawka-Dobrowolska, 1977; Kubíček et al., 2003) which are comparable with the title complex. Furthermore, alkyldiphosphinates are known to be efficient tectons (for the term tecton, see: Brunet et al., 1997) to construct hydrogen bonded frameworks (Glidewell et al., 2000). Especially it has also been shown that amino phosphinic anions are able to form hydrogen bonded one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional supramolecular architectures (Chen et al., 2010). For the neutral dmpa there are some examples that show its ability to coordinate transition metals (Borisov et al. 1994; Kochel, 2009) and also a salt containing the protonated dpmaH cation has been structurally characterized (Reiss & Jörgens, 2012). The structure determination on fac-diaquatrichlorido((dimethylphosphoryl)methanaminium)manganese(II) is part of our continuing interest in the hydrogen bonding of methylphosphinic acids and its derivatives (Reiss & Engel, 2008) and the field of application as a tectons for the construction of new hydrogen bonded networks (e.g. Meyer et al., 2010).

The title structure crystallizes in the monoclinic, chiral space group P21. The asymmetric unit consists of one formula unit of the fac-diaquatrichlorido((dimethylphosphoryl)methanaminium)manganese(II) complex. The three chlorido ligands show a facial arrangement with Mn—Cl distances between 2.5137 (3) and 2.5717 (3) Å which is in excellent agreement with other Mn(II) complexes (Głowiak & Sawka-Dobrowolska, 1977; Kubíček et al., 2003; Karthikeyan et al., 2011). The Cl—Mn—Cl angles of 92.163 (8)° to 93.346 (8)° are in the typical range of hexacoordinate aqua-chlorido manganese(II) complexes (e.g. Feist et al. 1997). The distorted octahedral coordination at the Mn(II) metal center is completed by two water molecules and a O-coordinated dpmaH cation. All Mn—O bond length as well as the geometrical parameters of the dpmaH cation are in the expected ranges. Each manganese complex is connected to adjacent complexes by O–H···Cl and N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds. Two of the chlorido ligands and the two water ligands form a hydrogen bonded two-dimensional polymer in the ab plane (Fig. 1). Adjacent layers are connected to each other by the cationic dpmaH ligand which is located between them. In detail the dpmaH ligand coordinates the manganese of one layer by its oxygen atom and forms a hydrogen bond to the next layer by its aminium group. The hydrogen bonding scheme of the formal two-dimensional polymer in the ab plane is characterized by three different types of annealed rings (Fig. 2; A, B and C-ring). All rings are classified to belong to the R22(8) graph-set descriptor (Etter et al., 1990, Bernstein et al., 1995), but they are different in detail. Ring A and B show a pseudo-inversion symmetry (for a more general introduction into pseudo-symmetry, see: Ruck, 2000) whereas ring C seems to have a mirror symmetry. The pseudo-symmetry features of the hydrogen bonding motifs are related to a pseudo-mirror plane present perpendicular to the b axis. According to the checkcif algorithm more than 90% of the atom positions of the title structure fulfill this additional symmetry element. Figure 1 visualizes this pseudosymmetry situation and it is abundantly clear that the aminium group significantly breaks this additional symmetry element. Especially in pseudosymmetric cases where no additional (super-structure) reflections are present a close look on the plausibility of structural model (Reiss, 2002a; Reiss, 2002b; Reiss & Konietzny, 2002;) and on the difference density maps are needed (Jones et al., 1988). In the latter stages of the refinement the presence of inversion twinning (ratio: 0.864 (5) / 0.136 (5)) was detected. The general hydrogen bonding scheme within the ab plane can be abstracted by a so-called constructor graph (Fig. 3; Grell et al., 2002). Especially in the constructor graph of the title structure the pseudosymmetry can be clearly seen. The infrared and Raman spectra of the title compound are shown in Fig. 4. Both spectra show bands similar to those reported for dpmaHCl (Reiss & Jörgens, 2012). A further assignment, especially for the far-infrared region of the Raman spectrum, is difficult as several lines are observed which may belong to modes of the dpma ligand or may result from stretch modes of Mn–O and Mn–Cl bonds.

For related dpma compounds, see: Borisov et al. (1994); Kochel (2009); Reiss & Jörgens (2012). For a definition of the term tecton, see: Brunet et al. (1997). For the use of anionic phosphinic acid derivatives as supramolecular tectons, see: Glidewell et al. (2000); Chen et al. (2010). For related methylphosphinic acids and derivatives, see: Reiss & Engel (2008); Meyer et al. (2010). For graph-set theory and its applications, see: Etter et al. (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995); Grell et al. (2002). For related manganese complexes, see: Głowiak & Sawka-Dobrowolska (1977); Feist et al. (1997); Kubíček et al. (2003); Karthikeyan et al. (2011). For manganese complexes as model system for metalloproteins, see: Wieghardt (1989). For examples of pseudo-symmetry, see: Jones et al. (1988); Reiss (2002a,b); Reiss & Konietzny (2002); Ruck (2000).

For related literature, see: .

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2011); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. View against the a axis on the hydrogen bonding scheme of the title structure (I). The atoms of the asymmetric unit is labelled and drawn as 45% ellipsoids.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. View along [001] on a two-dimensional segment of the title structure.Three different hydrogen bonded ring motifs (A, B, C) are shown which are all belonging to the R22(8) graph-set type.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Left part: Wireframe Model of the title structure with the hydrogen bonds shown as arrows. Right part: Constructor-graph (Grell et al., 2002) for the same part of the title structure (large black dots represent the Mn complexes; colour-codes arrows indicate the crystallographically independent hydrogen bonds).
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. Showing the Raman- and the infrared spectra of the title compound.
fac-diaquatrichlorido[(dimethylphosphoryl)methanaminium-κO]manganese(II) top
Crystal data top
[Mn(C3H11NOP)Cl3(H2O)2]F(000) = 310
Mr = 305.42Dx = 1.762 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ybCell parameters from 9869 reflections
a = 6.3535 (3) Åθ = 3.1–33.6°
b = 10.7304 (6) ŵ = 1.95 mm−1
c = 8.5629 (4) ÅT = 290 K
β = 99.490 (2)°Block, colourless
V = 575.79 (5) Å30.41 × 0.30 × 0.26 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer		4538 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube4518 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.030
φ and ω scansθmax = 33.6°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)		h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.723, Tmax = 0.980k = −16→16
29900 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.014 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0222P)2 + 0.0303P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.038(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.49 e Å−3
4538 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.29 e Å−3
149 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
5 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.273 (3)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 2165 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 0.136 (5)
Crystal data top
[Mn(C3H11NOP)Cl3(H2O)2]V = 575.79 (5) Å3
Mr = 305.42Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation
a = 6.3535 (3) ŵ = 1.95 mm−1
b = 10.7304 (6) ÅT = 290 K
c = 8.5629 (4) Å0.41 × 0.30 × 0.26 mm
β = 99.490 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer		4538 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)		4518 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.723, Tmax = 0.980Rint = 0.030
29900 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.014H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.038Δρmax = 0.49 e Å−3
S = 1.11Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3
4538 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 2165 Friedel pairs
149 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.136 (5)
5 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mn10.004766 (16)0.500568 (11)−0.133762 (11)0.01871 (3)
Cl10.24906 (3)0.33264 (2)−0.20350 (3)0.02689 (4)
Cl2−0.18984 (3)0.51538 (2)−0.41916 (2)0.02810 (5)
Cl30.27145 (3)0.673730 (19)−0.17200 (3)0.02618 (4)
P10.27696 (3)0.49973 (2)0.251182 (18)0.01833 (4)
O10.09298 (10)0.47944 (7)0.11869 (7)0.02894 (13)
N10.09847 (14)0.31507 (8)0.40879 (10)0.02992 (15)
H110.025 (3)0.3676 (17)0.467 (2)0.047 (5)*
H120.114 (3)0.2472 (18)0.452 (3)0.054 (5)*
H130.017 (3)0.2997 (16)0.315 (2)0.039 (4)*
O1W−0.21359 (12)0.65566 (7)−0.09214 (9)0.02909 (14)
O2W−0.24546 (13)0.36541 (8)−0.10488 (9)0.03152 (14)
H1O−0.3455 (15)0.645 (2)−0.121 (2)0.057 (6)*
H2O−0.199 (3)0.6966 (14)−0.0049 (13)0.039 (4)*
H3O−0.3747 (15)0.365 (2)−0.135 (2)0.058 (6)*
H4O−0.247 (4)0.325 (2)−0.0213 (19)0.079 (7)*
C10.30694 (15)0.36461 (8)0.38191 (10)0.02448 (15)
H11A0.38370.29980.33580.040 (4)*
H12A0.39090.38790.48280.027 (3)*
C20.2410 (2)0.62945 (10)0.37378 (13)0.0359 (2)
H210.22400.70390.31080.100 (9)*
H220.36360.63780.45520.096 (9)*
H230.11610.61660.42140.099 (9)*
C30.52844 (13)0.51400 (13)0.18863 (10)0.03147 (18)
H310.55000.44430.12270.090 (9)*
H320.63930.51550.27960.080 (6)*
H330.53220.58990.12970.058 (6)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mn10.01908 (5)0.02042 (5)0.01630 (5)−0.00011 (4)0.00192 (3)0.00049 (4)
Cl10.02524 (9)0.02786 (9)0.02755 (8)0.00643 (7)0.00433 (6)0.00031 (7)
Cl20.02977 (8)0.03377 (11)0.01848 (7)−0.00040 (7)−0.00279 (6)−0.00007 (6)
Cl30.02148 (8)0.02487 (9)0.03136 (9)−0.00303 (6)0.00192 (6)0.00126 (7)
P10.02142 (7)0.02078 (7)0.01289 (6)−0.00034 (7)0.00309 (5)0.00136 (7)
O10.0264 (3)0.0411 (4)0.0174 (2)−0.0039 (2)−0.00188 (19)0.0042 (2)
N10.0326 (4)0.0270 (3)0.0289 (3)−0.0090 (3)0.0016 (3)0.0044 (3)
O1W0.0248 (3)0.0324 (3)0.0302 (3)0.0055 (2)0.0050 (2)−0.0052 (3)
O2W0.0267 (3)0.0393 (4)0.0281 (3)−0.0097 (3)0.0033 (2)0.0044 (3)
C10.0276 (4)0.0229 (3)0.0220 (3)−0.0003 (3)0.0015 (3)0.0050 (2)
C20.0516 (6)0.0257 (4)0.0328 (4)0.0026 (4)0.0135 (4)−0.0048 (3)
C30.0238 (3)0.0482 (6)0.0234 (3)−0.0028 (4)0.0067 (2)0.0035 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Mn1—O12.1538 (6)N1—H130.899 (17)
Mn1—O2W2.1959 (8)O1W—H1O0.841 (9)
Mn1—O1W2.2326 (7)O1W—H2O0.858 (9)
Mn1—Cl12.5137 (3)O2W—H3O0.820 (9)
Mn1—Cl22.5554 (2)O2W—H4O0.836 (9)
Mn1—Cl32.5717 (3)C1—H11A0.9700
P1—O11.5046 (6)C1—H12A0.9700
P1—C31.7735 (8)C2—H210.9600
P1—C21.7806 (10)C2—H220.9600
P1—C11.8225 (8)C2—H230.9600
N1—C11.4800 (12)C3—H310.9600
N1—H110.928 (19)C3—H320.9600
N1—H120.82 (2)C3—H330.9600
O1—Mn1—O2W83.73 (3)H11—N1—H13109.2 (15)
O1—Mn1—O1W89.08 (3)H12—N1—H13104.7 (18)
O2W—Mn1—O1W89.65 (3)Mn1—O1W—H1O118.0 (15)
O1—Mn1—Cl195.41 (2)Mn1—O1W—H2O122.5 (11)
O2W—Mn1—Cl192.30 (2)H1O—O1W—H2O106.6 (17)
O1W—Mn1—Cl1175.27 (2)Mn1—O2W—H3O132.3 (15)
O1—Mn1—Cl2166.216 (19)Mn1—O2W—H4O123.2 (17)
O2W—Mn1—Cl284.47 (2)H3O—O2W—H4O97 (2)
O1W—Mn1—Cl283.74 (2)N1—C1—P1112.07 (6)
Cl1—Mn1—Cl292.163 (8)N1—C1—H11A109.2
O1—Mn1—Cl397.814 (19)P1—C1—H11A109.2
O2W—Mn1—Cl3174.88 (2)N1—C1—H12A109.2
O1W—Mn1—Cl385.50 (2)P1—C1—H12A109.2
Cl1—Mn1—Cl392.413 (8)H11A—C1—H12A107.9
Cl2—Mn1—Cl393.346 (8)P1—C2—H21109.5
O1—P1—C3114.29 (4)P1—C2—H22109.5
O1—P1—C2113.48 (5)H21—C2—H22109.5
C3—P1—C2108.67 (6)P1—C2—H23109.5
O1—P1—C1109.73 (4)H21—C2—H23109.5
C3—P1—C1104.24 (5)H22—C2—H23109.5
C2—P1—C1105.69 (4)P1—C3—H31109.5
P1—O1—Mn1141.52 (4)P1—C3—H32109.5
C1—N1—H11113.9 (11)H31—C3—H32109.5
C1—N1—H12110.3 (14)P1—C3—H33109.5
H11—N1—H12109.2 (18)H31—C3—H33109.5
C1—N1—H13109.1 (11)H32—C3—H33109.5
C3—P1—O1—Mn1−19.09 (9)Cl2—Mn1—O1—P1−168.19 (4)
C2—P1—O1—Mn1106.29 (8)Cl3—Mn1—O1—P1−24.42 (7)
C1—P1—O1—Mn1−135.75 (7)O1—P1—C1—N1−40.28 (7)
O2W—Mn1—O1—P1160.50 (8)C3—P1—C1—N1−163.10 (7)
O1W—Mn1—O1—P1−109.76 (8)C2—P1—C1—N182.43 (8)
Cl1—Mn1—O1—P168.77 (7)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H11···Cl2i0.928 (19)2.402 (19)3.3220 (10)171.3 (15)
N1—H12···Cl2ii0.82 (2)2.56 (2)3.2664 (9)145.9 (19)
N1—H13···Cl3ii0.899 (17)2.436 (17)3.2193 (8)145.8 (14)
O1W—H1O···Cl3iii0.84 (1)2.42 (1)3.2360 (8)164 (2)
O1W—H2O···Cl1iv0.86 (1)2.37 (1)3.2021 (7)164 (2)
O2W—H3O···Cl1iii0.82 (1)2.39 (1)3.2026 (8)171 (2)
O2W—H4O···Cl3ii0.84 (1)2.35 (1)3.1635 (8)166 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) −x, y−1/2, −z; (iii) x−1, y, z; (iv) −x, y+1/2, −z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Mn(C3H11NOP)Cl3(H2O)2]
Mr305.42
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21
Temperature (K)290
a, b, c (Å)6.3535 (3), 10.7304 (6), 8.5629 (4)
β (°) 99.490 (2)
V (Å3)575.79 (5)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm−1)1.95
Crystal size (mm)0.41 × 0.30 × 0.26
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
Tmin, Tmax0.723, 0.980
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections		29900, 4538, 4518
Rint0.030
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.779
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.014, 0.038, 1.11
No. of reflections4538
No. of parameters149
No. of restraints5
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.49, −0.29
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 2165 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.136 (5)

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008), SAINT (Bruker, 2008), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2011), publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H11···Cl2i0.928 (19)2.402 (19)3.3220 (10)171.3 (15)
N1—H12···Cl2ii0.82 (2)2.56 (2)3.2664 (9)145.9 (19)
N1—H13···Cl3ii0.899 (17)2.436 (17)3.2193 (8)145.8 (14)
O1W—H1O···Cl3iii0.841 (9)2.420 (11)3.2360 (8)163.8 (19)
O1W—H2O···Cl1iv0.858 (9)2.368 (10)3.2021 (7)164.2 (15)
O2W—H3O···Cl1iii0.820 (9)2.391 (10)3.2026 (8)171 (2)
O2W—H4O···Cl3ii0.836 (9)2.345 (11)3.1635 (8)166 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) −x, y−1/2, −z; (iii) x−1, y, z; (iv) −x, y+1/2, −z.
 

Acknowledgements

Technical support by V. Verheyen and E. Hammes is gratefully acknowledged. Furthermore, I acknowledge the support for the publication fee by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the open access publication fund of the Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.

References

First citationBernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 34, 1555–1573.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationBorisov, G., Varbanov, S. G., Venanzi, L. M., Albinati, A. & Demartin, F. (1994). Inorg. Chem. 33, 5430–5437.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationBrandenburg, K. (2011). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
 First citationBruker (2008). SADABS, SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationBrunet, P., Simard, M. & Wuest, J. D. (1997). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 2737–2738.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationChen, S.-P., Zhang, Y.-Q., Hu, L., He, H.-Z. & Yuan, L.-J. (2010). CrystEngComm, 12, 3327–3336.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationEtter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationFeist, M., Troyanov, S., Stiewe, A., Kemnitz, E. & Kunze, R. (1997). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 52, 1094–1102.  CAS Google Scholar
 First citationFlack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationGlidewell, C., Ferguson, G. & Lough, A. J. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 855–858.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationGłowiak, T. & Sawka-Dobrowolska, W. (1977). Acta Cryst. B33, 2763–2766.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationGrell, J., Bernstein, J. & Tinhofer, G. (2002). Crystallogr. Rev. 8, 1–56.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationJones, P. G., Schelbach, R., Schwarzmann, E. & Thöne, C. (1988). Acta Cryst. C44, 1196–1198.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationKarthikeyan, M., Karthikeyan, S. & Manimaran, B. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, m1367.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationKochel, A. (2009). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 362, 1379–1382.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationKubíček, V., Vojtíček, P., Rudovský, J., Hermann, P. & Lukeš, I. (2003). Dalton Trans. pp. 3927–3938.  Google Scholar
 First citationMeyer, M. K., Graf, J. & Reiss, G. J. (2010). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 65, 1462–1466.  CAS Google Scholar
 First citationReiss, G. J. (2002a). Z. Kristallogr. 217, 550–556.  CAS Google Scholar
 First citationReiss, G. J. (2002b). Z. Natuforsch. Teil B, 57, 479–482.  CAS Google Scholar
 First citationReiss, G. J. & Engel, J. S. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o400.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationReiss, G. J. & Jörgens, S. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o2899–o2900.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationReiss, G. J. & Konietzny, S. (2002). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 862–864.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationRuck, M. (2000). Z. Kristallogr. 215, 148–156.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationWieghardt, K. (1989). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 28, 1153–1172.  CrossRef Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 69| Part 5| May 2013| Pages m250-m251
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813008751
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS