organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Benzamidinium 2-meth­­oxy­benzoate

aChemistry Department, "Sapienza" University of Rome, P.le A. Moro, 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
*Correspondence e-mail: g.portalone@caspur.it

(Received 30 May 2013; accepted 12 June 2013; online 19 June 2013)

The title mol­ecular salt, C7H9N2+.C8H7O3, was synthesized by reaction between benzamidine (benzene­carboximidamide) and 2-meth­oxy­benzoic acid. In the cation, the amidinium group has two similar C—N bonds [1.3070 (17) and 1.3145 (16) Å] and is almost coplanar with the benzene ring, making a dihedral angle of 5.34 (12)°. In the anion, the meth­oxy substituent forces the carboxyl­ate group to be twisted by 69.45 (6)° with respect to the plane of the aromatic fragment. In the crystal, the components are connected by two N+—H⋯O (±)CAHB (charge-assisted hydrogen bonds), forming centrosymmetric ionic dimers with graph-set motif R22(8). These ionic dimers are then joined in ribbons running along the b-axis direction by another R42(8) motif involving the remaining N+—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Remarkably, at variance with the well known carb­oxy­lic dimer R22(8) motif, the carboxyl­ate–amidinium pair is not planar, the dihedral angle between the planes defined by the CN2+ and CO2 atoms being 18.57 (12)°.

Related literature

For the biological and pharmacological relevance of benzamidine, see: Powers & Harper (1999[Powers, J. C. & Harper, J. W. (1999). Proteinase inhibitors, edited by A. J. Barrett & G. Salvesen, pp. 55-152. Amsterdam: Elsevier.]). For structural analysis of proton-transfer adducts containing mol­ecules of biological inter­est, see: Portalone (2010[Portalone, G. (2010). Acta Cryst. C66, o295-o301.], 2013[Portalone, G. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o14-o15.]). For the supra­molecular association in proton-transfer adducts containing benzamidinium cations, see: Portalone (2010[Portalone, G. (2010). Acta Cryst. C66, o295-o301.], 2012[Portalone, G. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o268-o269.], 2013[Portalone, G. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o14-o15.]); Irrera & Portalone (2012[Irrera, S. & Portalone, G. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o3083.], 2013[Irrera, S. & Portalone, G. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o56.]); Irrera et al. (2012[Irrera, S., Ortaggi, G. & Portalone, G. (2012). Acta Cryst. C68, o447-o451.]). For 2-meth­oxy­benzoic acid derivatives, see: Portalone (2011[Portalone, G. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o3394-o3395.]). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995[Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555-1573.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C7H9N2+·C8H7O3

  • Mr = 272.30

  • Triclinic, [P \overline 1]

  • a = 7.5154 (3) Å

  • b = 9.1393 (4) Å

  • c = 11.6498 (5) Å

  • α = 69.612 (3)°

  • β = 80.500 (5)°

  • γ = 72.482 (4)°

  • V = 713.63 (6) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.09 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.12 × 0.09 × 0.05 mm

Data collection
  • Agilent Xcalibur Sapphire3 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011[Agilent (2011). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies Ltd, Abingdon, England.]) Tmin = 0.989, Tmax = 0.996

  • 20559 measured reflections

  • 4332 independent reflections

  • 3188 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.025

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.062

  • wR(F2) = 0.161

  • S = 1.05

  • 4332 reflections

  • 199 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1 0.913 (19) 1.87 (2) 2.7777 (16) 172.4 (17)
N1—H1B⋯O1i 0.87 (2) 1.97 (2) 2.7926 (15) 155.7 (17)
N2—H2A⋯O2 0.959 (19) 1.93 (2) 2.8863 (17) 175.4 (16)
N2—H2B⋯O2ii 0.86 (2) 2.00 (2) 2.8230 (16) 160.3 (18)
Symmetry codes: (i) -x-1, -y+1, -z+2; (ii) -x, -y, -z+2.

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011[Agilent (2011). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies Ltd, Abingdon, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999[Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115-119.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

The present study is a continuation of the work carried out in this Laboratory on proton-transfer adducts containing molecules of biological interest (Portalone, 2010, 2013), and deals with the single-crystal structure of the molecular salt, benzamidinium 2-methoxybenzoate, (I), obtained by a reaction between benzamidine (benzenecarboximidamide) and 2-methoxybenzoic acid in water solution. Benzamidine derivatives, which have shown strong biological and pharmacological activity (Powers & Harper, 1999), are being used in this Laboratory as bricks for supramolecular construction (Portalone, 2010). Indeed, these molecules are strong Lewis base and their cations can be easily anchored onto numerous inorganic and organic anions and polyanions, largely because of the presence of four potential donor sites for hydrogen-bonding.

The asymmetric unit of (I) comprises one planar benzamidinium cation and one 2-methoxybenzoate anion (Fig. 1).

In the cation the amidinium group forms a dihedral angle of 5.34 (12)° with the mean plane of the phenyl ring, at variance with the values observed in protonated benzamidinium ions (23.2 - 31.1°, Portalone, 2010; Portalone, 2013; Irrera et al., 2012; Irrera & Portalone, 2012, 2013). The pattern of bond lengths and bond angles of the benzamidinium cation agrees with that reported in previous structural investigations. In particular the amidinium group, true to one's expectations, features similar C—N bonds [1.3070 (17) and 1.3145 (16) Å], evidencing the delocalization of the π electrons and double-bond character.

In the 2-methoxybenzoate anion the benzene ring is essentially planar and the methoxy substituent forces the carboxylate group to be twisted with respect to the plane of the aromatic fragment by 69.45 (6)°. In the anion bond lengths and bond angles of the benzene ring are in accord with corresponding values obtained for both the orthorhombic and tetragonal forms of 2,6-dimethoxybenzoic acid (Portalone, 2011 and reference therein) and 4-methoxybenzamidinium 2,6-dimethoxybenzoate (Portalone, 2012). The C—O distances of the carboxylate group, 1.2441 (16) and 1.2488 (15) Å, indicate the delocalization of the negative charge.

The molecular components of the molecular salt are connected by two N+—H···O- (±)CAHB hydrogen bonds to form ionic dimers with graph-set motif R22(8) (Bernstein et al., 1995). Furthermore, centrosymmetric ionic dimers are joined in ribbons running along the b axis by another R24(8) motif involving the remaining N+—H···O- hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2). Remarkably, at variance with the well known carboxylic dimer R22 (8) motif, the carboxylate-amidinium pair is not planar, as the dihedral angle for the planes defined by the CN2+ and CO2- atoms is equal to 18.57 (12)°.

Related literature top

For the biological and pharmacological relevance of benzamidine, see: Powers & Harper (1999). For structural analysis of proton-transfer adducts containing molecules of biological interest, see: Portalone (2010, 2013). For the supramolecular association in proton-transfer adducts containing benzamidinium cations, see: Portalone (2010, 2012, 2013); Irrera & Portalone (2012, 2013); Irrera et al. (2012). For 2-methoxybenzoic acid derivatives, see: Portalone (2011). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995).

Experimental top

Equimolar amounts (0.1 mmol) of benzamidine (Fluka at 96% purity) and 2-methoxybenzoic acid (Aldrich at 99% purity) were dissolved without further purification in 6 ml of hot water and heated under reflux for 6 h. After cooling the solution to an ambient temperature, colourless crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were grown by slow evaporation of the solvent after two weeks.

Refinement top

All H atoms were identified in difference Fourier maps, but for refinement all C-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions, with C—H = 0.97 Å (phenyl) and 1.01 Å (methyl), and refined as riding on their carrier atoms. The Uiso values were kept equal to 1.2Ueq(C, phenyl). and to 1.5Ueq(C, methyl). The hydrogen atoms of the methyl group were allowed to rotate with a fixed angle around the C–C bond to best fit the experimental electron density [HFIX 138 in the SHELX program suite (Sheldrick, 2008)]. Positional and thermal parameters of H atoms of the amidinium group were freely refined, giving N—H distances in the range 0.86 (2) - 0.96 (2) Å.

Structure description top

The present study is a continuation of the work carried out in this Laboratory on proton-transfer adducts containing molecules of biological interest (Portalone, 2010, 2013), and deals with the single-crystal structure of the molecular salt, benzamidinium 2-methoxybenzoate, (I), obtained by a reaction between benzamidine (benzenecarboximidamide) and 2-methoxybenzoic acid in water solution. Benzamidine derivatives, which have shown strong biological and pharmacological activity (Powers & Harper, 1999), are being used in this Laboratory as bricks for supramolecular construction (Portalone, 2010). Indeed, these molecules are strong Lewis base and their cations can be easily anchored onto numerous inorganic and organic anions and polyanions, largely because of the presence of four potential donor sites for hydrogen-bonding.

The asymmetric unit of (I) comprises one planar benzamidinium cation and one 2-methoxybenzoate anion (Fig. 1).

In the cation the amidinium group forms a dihedral angle of 5.34 (12)° with the mean plane of the phenyl ring, at variance with the values observed in protonated benzamidinium ions (23.2 - 31.1°, Portalone, 2010; Portalone, 2013; Irrera et al., 2012; Irrera & Portalone, 2012, 2013). The pattern of bond lengths and bond angles of the benzamidinium cation agrees with that reported in previous structural investigations. In particular the amidinium group, true to one's expectations, features similar C—N bonds [1.3070 (17) and 1.3145 (16) Å], evidencing the delocalization of the π electrons and double-bond character.

In the 2-methoxybenzoate anion the benzene ring is essentially planar and the methoxy substituent forces the carboxylate group to be twisted with respect to the plane of the aromatic fragment by 69.45 (6)°. In the anion bond lengths and bond angles of the benzene ring are in accord with corresponding values obtained for both the orthorhombic and tetragonal forms of 2,6-dimethoxybenzoic acid (Portalone, 2011 and reference therein) and 4-methoxybenzamidinium 2,6-dimethoxybenzoate (Portalone, 2012). The C—O distances of the carboxylate group, 1.2441 (16) and 1.2488 (15) Å, indicate the delocalization of the negative charge.

The molecular components of the molecular salt are connected by two N+—H···O- (±)CAHB hydrogen bonds to form ionic dimers with graph-set motif R22(8) (Bernstein et al., 1995). Furthermore, centrosymmetric ionic dimers are joined in ribbons running along the b axis by another R24(8) motif involving the remaining N+—H···O- hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2). Remarkably, at variance with the well known carboxylic dimer R22 (8) motif, the carboxylate-amidinium pair is not planar, as the dihedral angle for the planes defined by the CN2+ and CO2- atoms is equal to 18.57 (12)°.

For the biological and pharmacological relevance of benzamidine, see: Powers & Harper (1999). For structural analysis of proton-transfer adducts containing molecules of biological interest, see: Portalone (2010, 2013). For the supramolecular association in proton-transfer adducts containing benzamidinium cations, see: Portalone (2010, 2012, 2013); Irrera & Portalone (2012, 2013); Irrera et al. (2012). For 2-methoxybenzoic acid derivatives, see: Portalone (2011). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit of (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacements ellipsoids are at the 50% probability level. The asymmetric unit was selected so that the two ions are linked by N—H+···O- hydrogen bonds. H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Crystal packing diagram for (I), viewed approximately down a. All atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. For the sake of clarity, H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted. Hydrogen bonding is indicated by dashed lines.
Benzamidinium 2-methoxybenzoate top
Crystal data top
C7H9N2+·C8H7O3Z = 2
Mr = 272.30F(000) = 288
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.267 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
a = 7.5154 (3) ÅCell parameters from 9004 reflections
b = 9.1393 (4) Åθ = 3.2–32.5°
c = 11.6498 (5) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
α = 69.612 (3)°T = 298 K
β = 80.500 (5)°Tablets, colourless
γ = 72.482 (4)°0.12 × 0.09 × 0.05 mm
V = 713.63 (6) Å3
Data collection top
Agilent Xcalibur Sapphire3
diffractometer
4332 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source3188 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.025
Detector resolution: 16.0696 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.5°, θmin = 3.2°
ω and φ scansh = 1010
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)
k = 1313
Tmin = 0.989, Tmax = 0.996l = 1616
20559 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.062Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.161H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0812P)2 + 0.1295P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4332 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
199 parametersΔρmax = 0.38 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.18 e Å3
Crystal data top
C7H9N2+·C8H7O3γ = 72.482 (4)°
Mr = 272.30V = 713.63 (6) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 7.5154 (3) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 9.1393 (4) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 11.6498 (5) ÅT = 298 K
α = 69.612 (3)°0.12 × 0.09 × 0.05 mm
β = 80.500 (5)°
Data collection top
Agilent Xcalibur Sapphire3
diffractometer
4332 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)
3188 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.989, Tmax = 0.996Rint = 0.025
20559 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0620 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.161H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.38 e Å3
4332 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.18 e Å3
199 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.44074 (18)0.33628 (15)0.94036 (13)0.0426 (3)
H1A0.369 (3)0.355 (2)0.9866 (17)0.052 (5)*
H1B0.550 (3)0.403 (2)0.9196 (17)0.053 (5)*
N20.21153 (17)0.11282 (17)0.93377 (13)0.0464 (3)
H2A0.139 (3)0.138 (2)0.9810 (17)0.055 (5)*
H2B0.167 (3)0.022 (3)0.9197 (18)0.059 (5)*
C10.50196 (17)0.16439 (15)0.84181 (11)0.0319 (3)
C20.6776 (2)0.2674 (2)0.81080 (18)0.0531 (4)
H20.71780.36930.82810.064*
C30.7954 (2)0.2254 (2)0.75542 (18)0.0602 (5)
H30.91720.29860.73330.072*
C40.7414 (2)0.0816 (2)0.73164 (15)0.0508 (4)
H40.82540.05220.69390.061*
C50.5678 (2)0.0216 (2)0.76121 (16)0.0504 (4)
H50.52910.12330.74350.060*
C60.4480 (2)0.01930 (18)0.81621 (14)0.0418 (3)
H60.32570.05390.83690.050*
C70.38026 (17)0.20627 (15)0.90698 (12)0.0323 (3)
O10.24816 (15)0.39582 (13)1.09618 (11)0.0513 (3)
O20.00870 (15)0.18920 (14)1.08560 (11)0.0536 (3)
O30.24579 (19)0.2238 (2)1.37136 (12)0.0694 (4)
C80.00944 (18)0.31556 (15)1.23202 (12)0.0335 (3)
C90.0897 (2)0.2793 (2)1.35187 (14)0.0434 (3)
C100.0097 (3)0.2988 (2)1.44339 (15)0.0572 (4)
H100.06540.27371.52680.069*
C110.1493 (3)0.3540 (2)1.41503 (17)0.0578 (5)
H110.20440.36781.47900.069*
C120.2300 (3)0.3895 (2)1.29805 (18)0.0567 (4)
H120.34170.42811.27880.068*
C130.1494 (2)0.3694 (2)1.20632 (14)0.0466 (4)
H130.20660.39401.12330.056*
C140.09582 (18)0.29772 (15)1.13074 (12)0.0335 (3)
C150.3237 (4)0.1697 (4)1.4934 (2)0.0938 (8)
H15A0.2241 (19)0.083 (2)1.5466 (11)0.141*
H15B0.430 (3)0.123 (2)1.4938 (3)0.141*
H15C0.372 (3)0.2639 (17)1.5268 (9)0.141*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0387 (6)0.0361 (6)0.0566 (8)0.0057 (5)0.0185 (5)0.0255 (6)
N20.0370 (6)0.0443 (7)0.0641 (8)0.0087 (5)0.0192 (6)0.0341 (7)
C10.0328 (6)0.0316 (6)0.0304 (6)0.0023 (5)0.0065 (5)0.0122 (5)
C20.0485 (8)0.0434 (8)0.0714 (11)0.0097 (7)0.0279 (8)0.0309 (8)
C30.0469 (9)0.0595 (10)0.0779 (12)0.0077 (8)0.0332 (8)0.0317 (9)
C40.0538 (9)0.0555 (9)0.0506 (9)0.0146 (7)0.0188 (7)0.0189 (7)
C50.0590 (9)0.0429 (8)0.0573 (9)0.0076 (7)0.0158 (7)0.0253 (7)
C60.0410 (7)0.0373 (7)0.0483 (8)0.0006 (6)0.0120 (6)0.0202 (6)
C70.0325 (6)0.0305 (6)0.0331 (6)0.0015 (5)0.0057 (5)0.0133 (5)
O10.0498 (6)0.0453 (6)0.0616 (7)0.0158 (5)0.0293 (5)0.0328 (5)
O20.0462 (6)0.0537 (7)0.0690 (7)0.0137 (5)0.0211 (5)0.0442 (6)
O30.0628 (8)0.1107 (12)0.0494 (7)0.0439 (8)0.0064 (6)0.0300 (7)
C80.0341 (6)0.0297 (6)0.0363 (6)0.0028 (5)0.0105 (5)0.0156 (5)
C90.0415 (7)0.0506 (8)0.0409 (7)0.0066 (6)0.0066 (6)0.0208 (6)
C100.0624 (10)0.0752 (12)0.0384 (8)0.0115 (9)0.0104 (7)0.0258 (8)
C110.0645 (11)0.0638 (11)0.0548 (10)0.0087 (9)0.0253 (8)0.0279 (8)
C120.0536 (9)0.0614 (10)0.0652 (11)0.0192 (8)0.0166 (8)0.0232 (9)
C130.0472 (8)0.0541 (9)0.0420 (8)0.0150 (7)0.0045 (6)0.0175 (7)
C140.0344 (6)0.0301 (6)0.0366 (6)0.0001 (5)0.0088 (5)0.0156 (5)
C150.0826 (16)0.144 (2)0.0608 (13)0.0546 (17)0.0201 (12)0.0299 (14)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C71.3070 (17)O1—C141.2488 (15)
N1—H1A0.913 (19)O2—C141.2441 (16)
N1—H1B0.87 (2)O3—C91.369 (2)
N2—C71.3145 (16)O3—C151.421 (3)
N2—H2A0.959 (19)C8—C131.375 (2)
N2—H2B0.86 (2)C8—C91.394 (2)
C1—C61.3869 (19)C8—C141.5135 (17)
C1—C21.3898 (19)C9—C101.393 (2)
C1—C71.4838 (18)C10—C111.381 (3)
C2—C31.383 (2)C10—H100.9700
C2—H20.9700C11—C121.367 (3)
C3—C41.366 (2)C11—H110.9700
C3—H30.9700C12—C131.399 (2)
C4—C51.375 (2)C12—H120.9700
C4—H40.9700C13—H130.9700
C5—C61.386 (2)C15—H15A1.0120
C5—H50.9700C15—H15B1.0120
C6—H60.9700C15—H15C1.0120
C7—N1—H1A119.2 (12)C13—C8—C9119.07 (13)
C7—N1—H1B120.3 (12)C13—C8—C14120.07 (12)
H1A—N1—H1B120.5 (17)C9—C8—C14120.86 (12)
C7—N2—H2A119.6 (11)O3—C9—C10124.03 (15)
C7—N2—H2B123.2 (13)O3—C9—C8115.99 (13)
H2A—N2—H2B116.7 (17)C10—C9—C8119.97 (15)
C6—C1—C2118.65 (13)C11—C10—C9119.83 (16)
C6—C1—C7121.19 (11)C11—C10—H10120.1
C2—C1—C7120.08 (12)C9—C10—H10120.1
C3—C2—C1120.39 (14)C12—C11—C10120.83 (15)
C3—C2—H2119.8C12—C11—H11119.6
C1—C2—H2119.8C10—C11—H11119.6
C4—C3—C2120.44 (15)C11—C12—C13119.22 (16)
C4—C3—H3119.8C11—C12—H12120.4
C2—C3—H3119.8C13—C12—H12120.4
C3—C4—C5119.99 (14)C8—C13—C12121.07 (15)
C3—C4—H4120.0C8—C13—H13119.5
C5—C4—H4120.0C12—C13—H13119.5
C4—C5—C6120.16 (15)O2—C14—O1124.40 (12)
C4—C5—H5119.9O2—C14—C8118.04 (11)
C6—C5—H5119.9O1—C14—C8117.53 (11)
C5—C6—C1120.36 (13)O3—C15—H15A109.5
C5—C6—H6119.8O3—C15—H15B109.5
C1—C6—H6119.8H15A—C15—H15B109.5
N1—C7—N2118.81 (13)O3—C15—H15C109.5
N1—C7—C1120.25 (11)H15A—C15—H15C109.5
N2—C7—C1120.93 (12)H15B—C15—H15C109.5
C9—O3—C15118.79 (15)
C6—C1—C2—C30.1 (3)C14—C8—C9—O31.6 (2)
C7—C1—C2—C3176.85 (16)C13—C8—C9—C100.4 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40.7 (3)C14—C8—C9—C10179.03 (14)
C2—C3—C4—C50.9 (3)O3—C9—C10—C11179.31 (17)
C3—C4—C5—C60.6 (3)C8—C9—C10—C110.1 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C10.0 (3)C9—C10—C11—C120.2 (3)
C2—C1—C6—C50.2 (2)C10—C11—C12—C130.1 (3)
C7—C1—C6—C5176.50 (14)C9—C8—C13—C120.6 (2)
C6—C1—C7—N1173.63 (14)C14—C8—C13—C12178.91 (14)
C2—C1—C7—N13.1 (2)C11—C12—C13—C80.3 (3)
C6—C1—C7—N25.4 (2)C13—C8—C14—O268.85 (18)
C2—C1—C7—N2177.93 (15)C9—C8—C14—O2111.69 (16)
C15—O3—C9—C105.5 (3)C13—C8—C14—O1109.51 (16)
C15—O3—C9—C8173.93 (19)C9—C8—C14—O169.95 (18)
C13—C8—C9—O3178.98 (14)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O10.913 (19)1.87 (2)2.7777 (16)172.4 (17)
N1—H1B···O1i0.87 (2)1.97 (2)2.7926 (15)155.7 (17)
N2—H2A···O20.959 (19)1.93 (2)2.8863 (17)175.4 (16)
N2—H2B···O2ii0.86 (2)2.00 (2)2.8230 (16)160.3 (18)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y+1, z+2; (ii) x, y, z+2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC7H9N2+·C8H7O3
Mr272.30
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)7.5154 (3), 9.1393 (4), 11.6498 (5)
α, β, γ (°)69.612 (3), 80.500 (5), 72.482 (4)
V3)713.63 (6)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.12 × 0.09 × 0.05
Data collection
DiffractometerAgilent Xcalibur Sapphire3
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)
Tmin, Tmax0.989, 0.996
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
20559, 4332, 3188
Rint0.025
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.714
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.062, 0.161, 1.05
No. of reflections4332
No. of parameters199
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.38, 0.18

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012), WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O10.913 (19)1.87 (2)2.7777 (16)172.4 (17)
N1—H1B···O1i0.87 (2)1.97 (2)2.7926 (15)155.7 (17)
N2—H2A···O20.959 (19)1.93 (2)2.8863 (17)175.4 (16)
N2—H2B···O2ii0.86 (2)2.00 (2)2.8230 (16)160.3 (18)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y+1, z+2; (ii) x, y, z+2.
 

References

First citationAgilent (2011). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies Ltd, Abingdon, England.  Google Scholar
First citationAltomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationIrrera, S., Ortaggi, G. & Portalone, G. (2012). Acta Cryst. C68, o447–o451.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationIrrera, S. & Portalone, G. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o3083.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationIrrera, S. & Portalone, G. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o56.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationPortalone, G. (2010). Acta Cryst. C66, o295–o301.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationPortalone, G. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o3394–o3395.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationPortalone, G. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o268–o269.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationPortalone, G. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o14–o15.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationPowers, J. C. & Harper, J. W. (1999). Proteinase inhibitors, edited by A. J. Barrett & G. Salvesen, pp. 55–152. Amsterdam: Elsevier.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds